T-cell death and cancer immune tolerance

Cancer patients mount adaptive immune responses against their tumors. However, tumor develops many mechanisms to evade effective immunosurveillance. T-cell death caused by tumor plays a critical role in establishing tumor immunotolerance. Chronic stimulation of T cells by tumors leads to activation-induced cell death. Abortive stimulation of T cells by tolerogenic antigen-presenting cells loaded with tumor antigens leads to autonomous death of tumor-specific T cells. Therapeutic approaches that prevent T-cell death in the tumor microenvironment and tumor draining lymph nodes, therefore, should boost adaptive immune responses against cancer.     

MHC class I antigens,immune surveillance,and tumor immune escape

Oncogenic transformation in human and experimental animals is not necessarily followed by the appearance of a tumor mass. The immune system of the host can recognize tumor antigens by the presentation of small antigenic peptides to the receptor of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) and reject the nascent tumor. However, cancer cells can sometimes escape these specific T-cell immune responses in the course of somatic (genetic and phenotypic) clonal evolution. Among the tumor immune escape mechanisms described to date, the alterations in the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules play a crucial step in tumor development due to the role of MHC antigens in antigen presentation to T-lymphocytes and the regulation of natural killer cell (NK) cell function. In this work, we have (1) updated information on the mechanisms that allow CTLs to recognize tumor antigens after antigen processing by transformed cells, (2) described the altered MHC class I phenotypes that are commonly found in human tumors, (3) summarized the molecular mechanisms responsible for MHC class I alteration in human tumors, (4) provided evidence that these altered human leukocyte antigens (HLA) class I phenotypes are detectable as result of a T-cell immunoselection of HLA class I-deficient variants by an immunecompetent host, and (5) presented data indicating the MHC class I phenotype and the immunogenicity of experimental metastatic tumors change drastically when tumors develop in immunodeficient mice.     

Oncolytic Immunotherapy: Can’t Start a Fire Without a Spark

Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy have renewed interest in oncolytic viruses (OVs) as a synergistic platform for the development of novel antitumor strategies. Cancer cells adopt multiple mechanisms to evade and suppress antitumor immune responses, essentially establishing a non-immunogenic (‘cold’) tumor microenvironment (TME), with poor T-cell infiltration and low mutational burden. Limitations to the efficacy of immunotherapy still exist, especially for a variety of solid tumors, where new approaches are necessary to overcome physical barriers in the TME and to mitigate adverse effects associated with current immunotherapeutics. OVs offer an attractive alternative by inducing direct oncolysis, immunogenic cell death, and immune stimulation. These multimodal mechanisms make OVs well suited to reprogram non-immunogenic tumors and TME into inflamed, immunogenic (‘hot’) tumors; enhanced release of tumor antigens by dying cancer cells is expected to augment T-cell infiltration, thereby eliciting potent antitumor immunity. Advances in virus engineering and understanding of tumor biology have allowed the optimization of OV-tumor selectivity, oncolytic potency, and immune stimulation. However, OV antitumor activity is likely to achieve its greatest potential as part of combinatorial strategies with other immune or cancer therapeutics.     

The potential of DNA vaccination against tumor-associated antigens for antitumor therapy

Conventional treatment approaches for malignant tumors are highly invasive and sometimes have only a palliative effect. Therefore, there is an increasing demand to develop novel, more efficient treatment options. Increased efforts have been made to apply immunomodulatory strategies in antitumor treatment. In recent years, immunizations with naked plasmid DNA encoding tumor-associated antigens have revealed a number of advantages. By DNA vaccination, antigen-specific cellular as well as humoral immune responses can be generated. The induction of specific immune responses directed against antigens expressed in tumor cells and displayed e.g., by MHC class I complexes can inhibit tumor growth and lead to tumor rejection. The improvement of vaccine efficacy has become a critical goal in the development of DNA vaccination as antitumor therapy. The use of different DNA delivery techniques and coadministration of adjuvants including cytokine genes may influence the pattern of specific immune responses induced. This brief review describes recent developments to optimize DNA vaccination against tumor-associated antigens. The prerequisite for a successful antitumor vaccination is breaking tolerance to tumor-associated antigens, which represent "self-antigens." Currently, immunization with xenogeneic DNA to induce immune responses against self-molecules is under intensive investigation. Tumor cells can develop immune escape mechanisms by generation of antigen loss variants, therefore, it may be necessary that DNA vaccines contain more than one tumor antigen. Polyimmunization with a mixture of tumor-associated antigen genes may have a synergistic effect in tumor treatment. The identification of tumor antigens that may serve as targets for DNA immunization has proceeded rapidly. Preclinical studies in animal models are promising that DNA immunization is a potent strategy for mediating antitumor effects in vivo. Thus, DNA vaccines may offer a novel treatment for tumor patients. DNA vaccines may also be useful in the prevention of tumors with genetic predisposition. By DNA vaccination preventing infections, the development of viral-induced tumors may be avoided.     

Vaccines for colorectal cancer.

Despite recent advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer, the overall survival rate for those patients with advanced locoregional disease remains less than 50%. Although adjuvant systemic chemotherapy has improved survival of these patients, more effective therapies are needed. Immunotherapy is an approach that could have a particular role in the adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer. There is now convincing evidence that the immune system can specifically recognize and destroy malignant cells. Although both antibody- and T-cell-mediated anti-tumor responses have been documented, the cellular immune response with its direct cytotoxic mechanisms is felt to be the principal anti-tumor arm of the immune system. Analysis of the T cells that recognize tumors has led to the identification and characterization of many tumor-associated antigens including several colorectal antigens. Current approaches to developing a vaccine for colorectal cancer use our expanded understanding of these tumor-associated antigens and the conditions that allow development of an effective cellular immune response to them.     

Tumors and the danger model

This article reviews the evidence for the danger model in the context of immune response to tumors and the insufficiency of the immune system to eliminate tumor growth. Despite their potential immunogenicity tumors do not induce significant immune responses which could destroy malignant cells. According to the danger model, the immune surveillance system fails to detect tumor antigens because transformed cells do not send any danger signals which could activate dendritic cells and initiate an immune response. Instead, tumor cells or antigen presenting cells turn off the responding T cells and induce tolerance. The studies reviewed herein based on model tumor antigens, recombinant viral vectors and detection of tumor specific T cells by MHC/peptide tetramers underscore the critical role of tumor antigen presentation and the context in which it occurs. They indicate that antigen presentation only by activated but not by cancer or resting dendritic cells is necessary for the induction of immune responses to tumor antigens. It becomes apparent that the inability of dendritic cells to become activated provides a biological niche for tumor escape from immune destruction and seems to be a principal mechanism for the failure of tumor immune surveillance.     

Dissecting tumor responsiveness to immunotherapy: the experience of peptide-based melanoma vaccines

Recent years have witnessed important breakthroughs in our understanding of tumor immunology. A variety of immunotherapeutic strategies has shown that immune manipulation can induce the regression of established cancer in humans. The identification of the genes encoding tumor-associated antigens (TAA) and the development of means for immunizing against these antigens have opened new avenues for the development of an effective anticancer immunotherapy. However, an efficient immune response against tumor requires an intricate cross-talk between cancer and immune system cells, which is still poorly understood. Only when the molecular basis underlying tumor susceptibility to an immune response is deciphered could new therapeutic strategies be designed to fit biologically defined mechanisms of cancer immune rejection. In this article, we address some of the critical issues that have been identified in cancer immunotherapy, in part from our own studies on immune therapies in melanoma patients treated with peptide-based vaccination regimens. This is not meant to be a comprehensive overview of the immunological phenomena accompanying cancer patient vaccination but rather emphasizes some emergent findings, puzzling controversies and unanswered questions that characterize this complex field of oncology. In addition to reviewing the main immunological concepts underlying peptide-based vaccination, we also review the available data regarding naturally occurring and therapeutically induced anticancer immune response, both at the peripheral and intratumoral level. The hypothesized role of innate immunity in predetermining tumor responsiveness to immunotherapeutic manipulation is also discussed.     

Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors

As a treatment for solid tumors, dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy has not been as effective as expected. Here, we review the reasons underlying the limitations of DC-based immunotherapy for solid tumors and ask what can be done to improve immune cell-based cancer therapies. Several reports show that, rather than a lack of immune induction, the limited efficacy of DC-based immunotherapy in cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) likely results from inhibition of immune responses by tumor-secreted TGF-β and an increase in the number of regulatory T (Treg) cells in and around the solid tumor. Indeed, unlike DC therapy for solid tumors, cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses induced by DC therapy inhibit tumor recurrence after surgery; CTL responses also limit tumor metastasis induced by additional tumor-challenge in RCC tumor-bearing mice. Here, we discuss the mechanisms underlying the poor efficacy of DC-based therapy for solid tumors and stress the need for new and improved DC immunotherapies and/or combination therapies with killer cells to treat resistant solid tumors.     

Role Of Immature Myeloid Cells in Mechanisms of Immune Evasion In Cancer

Tumor affects myelopoiesis by inhibiting the process of differentiation/maturation of antigen-presenting cells from their myeloid precursors and by stimulating an accumulation of immature myeloid cells in cancer patients and tumor-bearing mice. These immature myeloid cells can contribute greatly to tumor progression and promote tumor evasion from immune attack: i) by inhibiting development of adaptive immune responses against tumor in lymphoid organs; ii) by migrating into tumor site and differentiating there into highly immune suppressive tumor-associated macrophages. Immature myeloid cells and tumor-associated macrophages utilize different JAK/STAT signaling pathways and different mechanisms to control T cell responses, which include increased production of TGF-beta, reactive oxygen species, peroxynitrites, as well as enhanced L-arginine metabolism. Understanding of precise mechanisms, which tumors use to affect differentiation of APC from myeloid cell precursors and inhibit T cell responses, could help to develop new approaches for cancer therapy and substantially improve efficiency of existing cancer vaccination strategies.     

Targeting unique tumor antigens and modulating the cytokine environment may improve immunotherapy for tumors with immune escape mechanisms

Cytotoxic T-cell responses to shared tumor antigens have been characterized for several tumor types, and the MHC-associated peptides that comprise these antigens have been defined at a molecular level. These provide new tools to determine whether immune responses can be generated with these tumor antigens, and there are data to suggest that such immune responses can be generated. However, it is also clear that tumor cells can evade immune responses directed against some shared antigens, by downregulating expression of MHC or of the antigenic protein(s), as well as by more active methods such as secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines. Awareness of these mechanisms of immune escape will help to direct development of the next generation of tumor vaccines. Targeting unique antigens and modulating the cytokine environment likely will be critical to comprehensive vaccine systems in the future. Received: 20 March 1999 / Accepted: 3 May 1999     

Liposome-polycation-DNA (LPD) particle as a carrier and adjuvant for protein-based vaccines: Therapeutic effect against cervical cancer

With the successful identification of many tumor-specific antigens, tumor-associated antigens, and the potential of using unfractioned tumor cell derivatives as tumor antigens, a system and/or adjuvant that can deliver these antigens and help them to induce strong and effective anti-tumor immune responses is greatly needed. Previously, we reported that a MHC class I-restricted peptide epitope derived from human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 E7 protein, when incorporated into a clinically proven safe LPD (liposome-polycation-DNA) particle, was able to effectively eradicate tumors established in mice. Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide. HPV infection is clearly linked to this cancer. Vaccines based on the early (E) gene products of HPV could be effective in controlling it. However, besides the fact that epitope vaccines have many limitations particularly, concerning the diverse HLAs in humans, the use of the epitope as an antigen prevented us from fully characterizing the immune responses induced by the LPD as a vaccine carrier and/or adjuvant in previous studies. In the present study, by using the HPV 16 E7 protein as an antigen, we first showed that LPD, as a vaccine carrier and adjuvant induced strong and robust immune responses, both cellular and antibody. We then showed that immunization with LPD particles incorporated with either the wild type HPV 16 E7 protein or a potentially safer mutant induced strong immune responses that caused complete regressions of a model cervical cancer tumor established in murines. LPD could be a potent vaccine carrier and/or adjuvant for many antigens.     

The roles of mast cells in anticancer immunity

The tumor microenvironment (TME), which is composed of stromal cells such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells, provides a supportive niche promoting the growth and invasion of tumors. The TME also raises an immunosuppressive barrier to effective antitumor immune responses and is therefore emerging as a target for cancer immunotherapies. Mast cells (MCs) accumulate in the TME at early stages, and their presence in the TME is associated with poor prognosis in many aggressive human cancers. Some well-established roles of MCs in cancer are promoting angiogenesis and tumor invasion into surrounding tissues. Several mouse models of inducible and spontaneous cancer show that MCs are among the first immune cells to accumulate within and shape the TME. Although MCs and other suppressive myeloid cells are associated with poor prognosis in human cancers, high densities of intratumoral T effector (T(eff)) cells are associated with a favorable prognosis. The latter finding has stimulated interest in developing therapies to increase intratumoral T cell density. However, cellular and molecular mechanisms promoting high densities of intratumoral T(eff) cells within the TME are poorly understood. New evidence suggests that MCs are essential for shaping the immune-suppressive TME and impairing both antitumor T(eff) cell responses and intratumoral T cell accumulation. These roles for MCs warrant further elucidation in order to improve antitumor immunity. Here, we will summarize clinical studies of the prognostic significance of MCs within the TME in human cancers, as well as studies in mouse models of cancer that reveal how MCs are recruited to the TME and how MCs facilitate tumor growth. Also, we will summarize our recent studies indicating that MCs impair generation of protective antitumor T cell responses and accumulation of intratumoral T(eff) cells. We will also highlight some approaches to target MCs in the TME in order to unleash antitumor cytotoxicity.     

Dendritic cell based immunotherapy--a promising therapeutic approach for endocrine malignancies.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen presenting cells in the human organism. Ever since the discovery of their function in the self/nonself discrimination, DCs have been seen as potential candidates for therapy in malignant tumors. With the exception of differentiated thyroid cancer, endocrine malignancies are rare tumors and apart from surgical intervention there is no truly established method for their treatment. Therefore, the prognosis of many endocrine carcinomas is still poor and new therapeutic options are needed. In the last decade, different immunotherapeutic approaches have shown promising results in other solid tumors. In recent studies, immunotherapy using DCs has been proven to be safe and effective to induce antitumor immune responses leading to tumor regression and even rejection of cancer in some cases. This review will summarize the latest progress in DCs based immunotherapy with special focus on the limited experience in endocrine malignancies. With regard to these tumors, it is of special interest which antigens could serve as potential target antigens for future trials. We also discuss what steps have to be taken to develop a better immunotherapy in endocrine tumors.     

An autologous dendritic cell canine mammary tumor hybrid-cell fusion vaccine

Mammary cancer is among the most prevalent canine tumors and frequently resulting in death due to metastatic disease that is highly homologous to human breast cancer. Most canine tumors fail to raise effective immune reactions yet, some spontaneous remissions do occur. Hybrid canine dendritic cell–tumor cell fusion vaccines were designed to enhance antigen presentation and tumor immune recognition. Peripheral blood-derived autologous dendritic cell enriched populations were isolated from dogs based on CD11c⁺ expression and fused with canine mammary tumor (CMT) cells for vaccination of laboratory Beagles. These hybrid cells were injected into popliteal lymph nodes of normal dogs, guided by ultrasound, and included CpG-oligonucleotide adjuvants. Three rounds of vaccination were delivered. Significant IgG responses were observed in all vaccinated dogs compared to vehicle-injected controls. Canine IgG antibodies recognized shared CMT antigens as was demonstrated by IgG-recognition of three unrelated/independently derived CMT cell lines, and recognition of freshly isolated, unrelated, primary biopsy-derived CMT cells. A bias toward an IgG2 isotype response was observed after two vaccinations in most dogs. Neither significant cytotoxic T cell responses were detected, nor adverse or side-effects due to vaccination or due to the induced immune responses noted. These data provide proof-of-principle for this cancer vaccine strategy and demonstrate the presence of shared CMT antigens that promote immune recognition of mammary cancer.     

Relationship between immune state and tumor growth rate in rats bearing progressive and non-progressive mammary tumors

 Impaired immune responses occur frequently in cancer patients or in tumor-bearing animals, but the mechanisms of the tumor-induced immune defects remain poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to determine the relevance of the immune system in the control of tumor growth. We have developed a model of progressive and non-progressive mammary tumor, chemically induced in female Wistar rats. In this model we evaluated the development of an immune response after immunization of rats bearing progressive and non-progressive tumors with a non-related antigen, such as sheep red blood cells. We also studied the activation state of peritoneal macrophages from animals bearing tumors by evaluating the production of free radicals. Our findings indicated that the cell-mediated immunity in rats bearing progressive tumors fails to respond to heterologous antigen in vivo, as demonstrated by a negative delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction, and is accompanied by minor nitric oxide production by peritoneal exudate cells as well as a lower capacity for macrophage activation. The study of non-progressive tumor-bearing rats indicated that the cell-mediated immune response was intact and an activated state of macrophages was found in vivo. The results described in this paper should be taken into account when therapies based on cancer vaccines are chosen for the treatment of cancer. Received: 26 February 1998 / 9 April 1998     

Dynamic cross-talk between tumor and immune cells in orchestrating the immunosuppressive network at the tumor microenvironment

Accumulating evidence indicates that a dynamic cross-talk between tumors and the immune system can regulate tumor growth and metastasis. Increased understanding of the biochemical nature of tumor antigens and the molecular mechanisms responsible for innate and adaptive immune cell activation has revolutionized the fields of tumor immunology and immunotherapy. Both the protective effects of the immune system against tumor cells (immunosurveillance) and the evasion of tumor cells from immune attack (tumor-immune escape) have led to the concept of cancer immunoediting, a proposal which infers that a bidirectional interaction between tumor and inflammatory/regulatory cells is ultimately responsible for orchestrating the immunosuppressive network at the tumor site. In this context, a major challenge is the potentiation or redirection of tumor antigen-specific immune responses. The success in reaching this goal is highly dependent on an improved understanding of the interactions and mechanisms operating during the different phases of the cancer immunoediting process. In this review, we discuss the multiple defense and counterattack strategies that tumors have devised in order to evade immune attack and to thwart the effectiveness of several immunotherapeutic approaches. Diego O. Croci, Mariano F. Zacarías Fluck contributed equally to this work. Gabriel A. Rabinovich, O. Graciela Scharovsky contributed equally to this work and should be considered as senior authors.     

Preparation of dendritic cells for cancer immunotherapy

Development of new effective method for cancer therapy is one of the most important trends in the modern medicine. Along with surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, induction of an immune response against the tumor cells is a promising approach for therapy of cancer, particularly metastatic, slowly dividing tumors and cancer stem cells. Induction of the antitumor T-cell immune response involves activation of antigen-presenting cells, which can efficiently present the cancer antigens and activate T-lymphocytes. The immune response may be activated by dendritic cells (DC) loaded with tumor antigens, such as tumor-specific proteins, tumor cell lysates, apoptotic or necrotic tumor cells, as well as nucleic acids encoding tumor antigens. Regardless of the selected source of the tumor antigen, preparation of mature DC is a principal step in the development of anticancer vaccines aimed at the induction of the cytotoxic T-cell immune response. Recently, various research groups have proposed several strategies for producing mature DC, differed by the set of agents used. It has been shown that the maturation strategy influences both their phenotype and the ability to induce the immune response. In this review we have analyzed the results of studies on the various strategies of preparation of mature DCs.     

Identification of MHC class II-restricted tumor antigens recognized by CD4+ T cells

CD4+ T cells play a central role in orchestrating host immune responses against cancer as well as autoimmune and infectious diseases. Identification of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-restricted helper T peptides is important for development of effective vaccines. The lack of effective methods to identify such T-cell peptides is a major hurdle in the use of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in cancer vaccines. Here we describe a genetic targeting expression system for cloning genes encoding for MHC class II-restricted tumor antigens recognized by tumor-reactive CD4+ T cells. Helper T peptides are subsequently identified by using synthetic peptides to test their ability to stimulate CD4+ T cells.     

The role of dendritic cells in tumor microenvironments and their uses as therapeutic targets

Dendritic cells (DC), which consist of several different subsets, specialize in antigen presentation and are critical for mediating the innate and adaptive immune responses. DC subsets can be classified into conventional, plasmacytoid, and monocyte-derived DC in the tumor microenvironment, and each subset plays a different role. Because of the role of intratumoral DCs in initiating antitumor immune responses with tumor-derived antigen presentation to T cells, DCs have been targeted in the treatment of cancer. By regulating the functionality of DCs, several DC-based immunotherapies have been developed, including administration of tumor-derived antigens and DC vaccines. In addition, DCs participate in the mechanisms of classical cancer therapies, such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Thus, regulating DCs is also important in improving current cancer therapies. Here, we will discuss the role of each DC subset in antitumor immune responses, and the current status of DC-related cancer therapies.