Host-cell-determined methylation of specific Epstein-Barr virus promoters regulates the choice between distinct viral latency programs.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is capable of adopting three distinct forms of latency: the type III latency program, in which six EBV-encoded nuclear antigens (EBNAs) are expressed, and the type I and type II latency programs, in which only a single viral nuclear protein, EBNA1, is produced. Several groups have reported heavy CpG methylation of the EBV genome in Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines which maintain type I latency, and loss of viral genome methylation in tumor cell lines has been correlated with a switch to type III latency. Here, evidence that the type III latency program must be inactivated by methylation to allow EBV to enter the type I or type II restricted latency program is provided. The data demonstrates that the EBNA1 gene promoter, Qp, active in types I and II latency, is encompassed by a CpG island which is protected from methylation. CpG methylation inactivates the type III latency program and consequently allows the type I or II latency program to operate by alleviating EBNA1-mediated repression of Qp. Methylation of the type III latency EBNA gene promoter, Cp, appears to be essential to prevent type III latency, since EBNA1 is expressed in all latently infected cells and, as shown here, is the only viral antigen required for activation of Cp. EBV is thus a pathogen which subverts host-cell-determined methylation to regulate distinct genetic programs.     

Methylation of CpG dinucleotides in the open reading frame of a testicular germ cell-specific intronless gene,Tact1/Actl7b,represses its expression in somatic cells

Methylation of CpG islands spanning promoter regions is associated with control of gene expression. However, it is considered that methylation of exonic CpG islands without promoter is not related to gene expression, because such exonic CpG islands are usually distant from the promoter. Whether methylation of exonic CpG islands near the promoter, as in the case of a CpG-rich intronless gene, causes repression of the promoter remains unknown. To gain insight into this issue, we investigated the distribution and methylation status of CpG dinucleotides in the mouse Tact1/Actl7b gene, which is intronless and expressed exclusively in testicular germ cells. The region upstream to the gene was poor in CpG, with CpG dinucleotides absent from the core promoter. However, a CpG island was found inside the open reading frame (ORF). Analysis of the methylation status of the Tact1/Actl7b gene including the 5′-flanking area demonstrated that all CpG sites were methylated in somatic cells, whereas these sites were unmethylated in the Tact1/Actl7b-positive testis. Trans fection experiments with in vitro-methylated constructs indicated that methylation of the ORF but not 5′ upstream repressed Tact1/Actl7b promoter activity in somatic cells. Similar effects of ORF methylation on the promoter activity were observed in testicular germ cells. These are the first results indicating that methylation of the CpG island in the ORF represses its promoter in somatic cells and demethylation is necessary for gene expression in spermatogenic cells.     

DNA methylation‐mediated epigenetic control

During differentiation and development cells undergo dramatic morphological and functional changes without any change in the DNA sequence. The underlying changes of gene expression patterns are established and maintained by epigenetic processes. Early mechanistic insights came from the observation that gene activity and repression states correlate with the DNA methylation level of their promoter region. DNA methylation is a postreplicative modification that occurs exclusively at the C5 position of cytosine residues (5mC) and predominantly in the context of CpG dinucleotides in vertebrate cells. Here, three major DNA methyltransferases (Dnmt1, 3a, and 3b) establish specific DNA methylation patterns during differentiation and maintain them over many cell division cycles. CpG methylation is recognized by at least three protein families that in turn recruit histone modifying and chromatin remodeling enzymes and thus translate DNA methylation into repressive chromatin structures. By now a multitude of histone modifications have been linked in various ways with DNA methylation. We will discuss some of the basic connections and the emerging complexity of these regulatory networks. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 43–51, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Epigenetic and transcriptional changes which follow Epstein-Barr virus infection of germinal center B cells and their relevance to the pathogenesis of Hodgkin's lymphoma

Although Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) usually establishes an asymptomatic lifelong infection, it is also implicated in the development of germinal center (GC) B-cell-derived malignancies, including Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Following primary infection, EBV remains latent in the memory B-cell population, where host-driven methylation of viral DNA contributes to the repression of viral gene expression. However, it is still unclear how EBV harnesses the cell's methylation machinery in B cells, how this contributes to viral persistence, and what impact this has on the methylation of cellular genes. We show that EBV infection of GC B cells is followed by upregulation of the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A and downregulation of DNMT3B and DNMT1. We show that the EBV latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) oncogene downregulates DNMT1 and that DNMT3A binds to the viral promoter Wp. Genome-wide promoter arrays performed with these cells showed that EBV-associated methylation changes in cellular genes were not randomly distributed across the genome but clustered at chromosomal locations, consistent with an instructive pattern of methylation, and were in part determined by promoter CpG content. Both DNMT3B and DNMT1 were downregulated and DNMT3A was upregulated in HL cell lines, recapitulating the pattern of expression observed following EBV infection of GC B cells. We also found, by using gene expression profiling, that genes differentially expressed following EBV infection of GC B cells were significantly enriched for those reported to be differentially expressed in HL. These observations suggest that EBV-infected GC B cells are a useful model for studying virus-associated changes contributing to the pathogenesis of HL.     

Differential epigenetic regulation of BDNF and NT-3 genes by trichostatin A and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine in Neuro-2a cells

To understand epigenetic regulation of neurotrophins in Neuro-2a mouse neuroblastoma cells, we investigated the alteration of CpG methylation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promoter I and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) promoter IB and that of histone modification in Neuro-2a cells. Bisulfite genomic sequencing showed that the CpG sites of BDNF promoter I were methylated in non-treated Neuro-2a cells and demethylated following 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) treatment. In contrast, methylation status of the NT-3 promoter IB did not change by 5-aza-dC treatment in Neuro-2a cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that BDNF exon I-IX mRNA was induced by trichostatin A (TSA) treatment. However, NT-3 exon IB-II mRNA was not induced by TSA treatment. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that the levels of acetylated histones H3 and H4 on BDNF promoter I were increased by TSA. These results demonstrate that DNA methylation and/or histone modification regulate BDNF gene expression, but do not regulate NT-3 gene expression in Neuro-2a cells.     

EBNA3C Directs Recruitment of RBPJ (CBF1) to Chromatin during the Process of Gene Repression in EBV Infected B Cells

It is well established that Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C (EBNA3C) can act as a potent repressor of gene expression, but little is known about the sequence of events occurring during the repression process. To explore further the role of EBNA3C in gene repression–particularly in relation to histone modifications and cell factors involved–the three host genes previously reported as most robustly repressed by EBNA3C were investigated. COBLL1, a gene of unknown function, is regulated by EBNA3C alone and the two co-regulated disintegrin/metalloproteases, ADAM28 and ADAMDEC1 have been described previously as targets of both EBNA3A and EBNA3C. For the first time, EBNA3C was here shown to be the main regulator of all three genes early after infection of primary B cells. Using various EBV-recombinants, repression over orders of magnitude was seen only when EBNA3C was expressed. Unexpectedly, full repression was not achieved until 30 days after infection. This was accurately reproduced in established LCLs carrying EBV-recombinants conditional for EBNA3C function, demonstrating the utility of the conditional system to replicate events early after infection. Using this system, detailed chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that the initial repression was associated with loss of activation-associated histone modifications (H3K9ac, H3K27ac and H3K4me3) and was independent of recruitment of polycomb proteins and deposition of the repressive H3K27me3 modification, which were only observed later in repression. Most remarkable, and in contrast to current models of RBPJ in repression, was the observation that this DNA-binding factor accumulated at the EBNA3C-binding sites only when EBNA3C was functional. Transient reporter assays indicated that repression of these genes was dependent on the interaction between EBNA3C and RBPJ. This was confirmed with a novel EBV-recombinant encoding a mutant of EBNA3C unable to bind RBPJ, by showing this virus was incapable of repressing COBLL1 or ADAM28/ADAMDEC1 in newly infected primary B cells.