Prevalence of high-grade CIN following mild dyskaryotic smears in different age groups

OBJECTIVE: The new guidelines of the British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology suggest that women should be offered colposcopy after only one mildly dyskaryotic smear. This is expected to generate increased workload for the colposcopy clinics, at least in the short term. The main objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears and investigate whether there is any variation in different age groups. The rationale was to determine whether we could reduce the burden on colposcopy services by prioritizing the mild dyskaryotic referrals by age, as we hypothesized that high-grade CIN is less frequent in younger women. METHODS: The study sample included all women who were referred for colposcopy with a cervical smear suggesting mild dyskaryosis (with or without koilocytosis) from April 2000 to March 2003. RESULTS: We studied 510 women. They were divided into three age groups (<20, 20-25 and >25 years). The overall prevalence of high-grade CIN (CIN II and III) was 28.7%.The positive predictive value of a mildly dyskaryotic smear for high-grade CIN was similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that we are not in a position to prioritize our referrals by age group and reduce the initial pressure for colposcopies. We are also concerned that with the implementation of the new guidelines, a significant number of women <25 years will be carrying high-grade CIN for more than 5 years before they are first screened.     

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cytology In Women Referred For Colposcopy and Biopsy: the Results of a 1 Year Audit

The results of weekly colposcopy review meetings have been audited for 1 year and cases where there was a discrepancy between the referral cervical smear and the initial colposcopy biopsy have been analysed. New referrals (n = 476) for colposcopy were studied. In the final outcome 80% of 326 women referred for moderate or severe dyskaryosis were found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II or III or invasive carcinoma. Three women found to have invasive carcinoma had been referred for severely dyskaryotic smears. Twenty women were referred for smears with cell changes suggesting glandular neoplasia: five were found to have adenocarcinoma in situ, whereas eight had CIN and seven had negative biopsies. The results justify the referral policy and demonstrate the need for further investigation when initial colposcopic biopsies are negative.     

The inadequate smear: does it matter?

The objective of this study was to quantify the incidence of underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among women referred for colposcopy with three consecutive inadequate smears. The design was a retrospective cohort study analysing data from a regional colposcopy database at Cervical Screening Wales. Women who were referred to all the colposcopy clinics in Wales with three consecutive inadequate smears, the third inadequate smear being taken between 1 April 2001 and 31 March 2002 constituted the study population. The results of the fourth smear taken at the colposcopy clinic after three consecutive inadequate smears, the worst biopsy results from any of the subsequent colposcopies and the relationship between the result of the fourth smear taken at colposcopy clinic and any histology result were the main outcome measures. The accuracy of the colposcopic opinion was also examined. Of the 433 women identified as having been referred because of three consecutive inadequate smears, 302 were linked to either a subsequent smear and/or a biopsy result. An adequate smear result was available for 85% of these women when the smear was taken in the colposcopy clinic; 77% were reported as negative and 8% were abnormal. Of the 347 women seen in the colposcopy clinic, high-grade CIN was seen in 3% and low-grade lesion in 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of the fourth inadequate smear test in predicting underlying CIN were 15% and 84% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of colposcopy in predicting histological CIN among patients with three inadequate smears was 70% and 49%, respectively, and the positive predictive value was 44%. This study raises the question as to whether three consecutive inadequate smears should be considered as an indication for colposcopy, or merely for a further smear to be taken in circumstances where there is a greater likelihood getting an adequate result.     

Colposcopic management of high‐grade referral smears: a retrospective audit supporting ‘see and treat'?

OBJECTIVE: The National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme monitors the quality of colposcopy services through the annual KC65 returns. The 2002 returns demonstrated that Standard 7c, which specifies a biopsy rate > or = 90% at first colposcopy visit for high-grade referrals, was not met in the assessed 3-month period. This was investigated along with the other standards. METHODS: Retrospective colposcopy records were accessed for the 597 new referrals, excluding 10 pregnant patients, seen at the colposcopy clinic at the Royal Victoria Infirmary between 1 July 2001 and 31 December 2002, following an abnormal high-grade smear. Cytology and histopathology computer records were checked for confirmation. The results were assessed against the colposcopy standards applicable at that time and the revised standards (2004). RESULTS: Biopsies were taken from 94.47% (Standard > or = 90%) of women at index colposcopy visit including wire loop excision biopsies from 66.16% (87.97% of high-grade colposcopic appearances). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on histology was found in 91.79% in the study group (Standard > or = 85%) and in 96.71% of index visit biopsies (Standard > or = 90%), meeting the applicable colposcopy standards. The revised 2004 standards specify a biopsy in > or = 95% of high-grade referrals and excision biopsies in 95% if colposcopic appearances are also high-grade, if colposcopy is low grade but the smear is severely dyskaryotic, or when the lesion extends into the canal. The positive predictive value of high-grade cytology for this entire group was 75.54% with CIN present in 90.95%. CONCLUSION: From this study it appears that high-grade cytology in this centre reliably indicates high-grade CIN. Therefore, in women referred for colposcopy following a high-grade smear, excision biopsies should be performed in a higher proportion at the first visit to comply with the revised standards.     

Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII

Two years after introducing mandatory review of cases in which the cervical smear was discrepant with subsequent colposcopic or histological finding, the predictive accuracy of a first abnormal smear and the need for treatment were analysed. The results were compared with performance figures prior to this form of audit policy. Over 12 months 415 women referred for colposcopy were studied. Three per cent of patients with a single borderline smear and 6% with mild dyskaryosis had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CINIII) revealed in histopathological examinations after colposcopy. Only 25% with a borderline smear and 33% with mild dyskaryosis required treatment. Of women with moderate dyskaryosis, 18% had a biopsy showing CINIII and 46% were treated. Of women with severe dyskaryosis in their cervical smear, 61% were shown to have CINIII or invasive cancer on biopsy and 90% were treated. Regular audit improved cytological prediction of grade of epithelial abnormality found on biopsy, allowing accurate, safe surveillance for minor smear abnormalities.     

Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII

Two years after introducing mandatory review of cases in which the cervical smear was discrepant with subsequent colposcopic or histological finding, the predictive accuracy of a first abnormal smear and the need for treatment were analysed. The results were compared with performance figures prior to this form of audit policy. Over 12 months 415 women referred for colposcopy were studied. Three per cent of patients with a single borderline smear and 6% with mild dyskaryosis had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CINIII) revealed in histopathological examinations after colposcopy. Only 25% with a borderline smear and 33% with mild dyskaryosis required treatment. Of women with moderate dyskaryosis, 18% had a biopsy showing CINIII and 46% were treated. Of women with severe dyskaryosis in their cervical smear, 61% were shown to have CINIII or invasive cancer on biopsy and 90% were treated. Regular audit improved cytological prediction of grade of epithelial abnormality found on biopsy, allowing accurate, safe surveillance for minor smear abnormalities.     

Outcome of women referred to colposcopy for persistently inadequate smears

The outcome of referral to colposcopy of 240 women who had persistently inadequate smears was investigated. Of 232 women who attended colposcopy, 214 (92.2%) had a normal outcome, 12 (5.2%) had low grade abnormalities, and six (2.6%) had high grade abnormalities. This group of women therefore has a negligibly increased risk of harbouring cervical neoplasia. Although not directly comparable, women with a history of previous abnormal cytology did not have a higher risk than those without such a history. Unnecessary colposcopy could have been avoided in the majority of cases if a good quality repeat smear had been taken. Improved smear taker training could decrease the number of referrals. A hospital cytology clinic is proposed as a cost-effective alternative to colposcopy at the first attendance.     

The use of screening episodes linked to CIN3 and invasive cancer registrations to study outcomes from the NHS Cervical Screening Programme

Objective: To examine how NHS cervical screening data can be collected and analysed in order to evaluate women’s screening histories as episodes rather than as individual smears. Design: Analysis of routine cervical screening data grouped into screening episodes for a cohort of women regarding episodes starting in a given year. Setting: NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Population: Data from four Health Authorities (now eight Primary Care Trusts) from the NHS Cervical Screening Programme with primary smears (first in an episode) taken between 1 April 1999 and 31 March 2000. Methods: Cytology information obtained from the call/recall (‘Exeter’) computer system was linked to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 and invasive cancer outcome information obtained from cancer registries. Screening histories were divided into episodes, each starting with a primary smear that was followed up to episode closure or, for episodes still open followed for an average 4.25 years, from the primary smear. The episode was divided into two parts (up to referral to colposcopy and following the referral). The outcomes of the episodes are described including referral rate to colposcopy and CIN3 and invasive cancer rates by factors such as age. Main outcome measures: Episode histories and rates of referral to colposcopy, CIN3 and invasive cancer. Results: There were 176 923 episodes from 176 319 women (1.003 episodes per woman) followed up to March 2004, the date at which the first phase of information accrual ceased. Of these episodes, 172 100 (97.3%) were closed either by a negative smear referring the woman back to routine recall or by default (defined as no smear recorded within 21 months following a smear requiring an action of repeat or refer to colposcopy). The remaining 4823 (2.7%) of episodes were still open, of which in 3121 (1.8%) the woman had been referred to colposcopy and in 1702 (1.0%) no referral decision had been made. Referral rates to colposcopy varied by age from 5.7% in women aged 20–24 years down to 0.9% in women aged 60–64 years. The overall efficiency of screening was highest for woman aged about 30 years, with a CIN3 detection rate of eight per 1000 women and a positive predictive value (for CIN3 or worse) of referral to colposcopy of 21%. Conclusion: The study has shown that routinely collected NHS cervical screening data can be combined to give information on complete episodes, allowing important performance measures to be studied. We suggest that in future information in the NHS screening system should be structured to facilitate such analysis and to allow cytology and histology information to be readily linked.     

Cervical disease in women referred to colposcopy following inadequate smears

The aim of this audit was to determine if inadequate cervical smears are associated with significant cervical pathology. Case records for 52 women with three consecutive inadequate smears referred for colposcopy to the Leicester Royal Infirmary (LRI) were retrieved. Sixteen women underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was identified in six cases. There were no cases of inadequate smears initiating the diagnosis in 100 consecutive women with invasive cervical cancer. Inadequate smears are associated with high rates of treatment for a low yield of CIN. To reduce morbidity associated with colposcopy it may be acceptable to repeat an inadequate smear after 6 months rather than arranging immediate recall.     

Posters. P11 Positive predictive values for high and low‐grade cytological abnormalities as surrogates for specificity and sensitivity

Introduction Positive predictive value (PPV), measuring the percentage of moderate dyskaryosis or worse confirmed as CIN2 or worse, is used as a measure of accuracy in cervical screening. However, it relates more to specificity than sensitivity because the denominator includes false positives rather than false negatives. Low values reflect over‐reporting of high‐grade dyskaryosis but high values may reflect under‐reporting. Sensitivity is impossible to measure from correlation of cytology with outcome because women with negative cytology are rarely referred for colposcopy. Rates of CIN3 resulting from referrals for low‐grade cytology may be used as a surrogate for sensitivity, as high values may reflect under‐reporting (ref). Study design Outcome of colposcopy referrals was monitored during a period of 4 years, using a fail‐safe database. Results PPV at Guy's & St Thomas rose from 54% in 1998/1999 to 69% in 2001/2002. The former was below the NHSCSP recommended range. During the same period of time CIN1 rates for moderate dyskaryosis fell from 37% to 24%, reflecting the main source of discrepancy. While specificity increased (as reflected by increasing PPV) sensitivity remained constant in that CIN3 rates for mild dyskaryosis and borderline remained below 6%: average rates in England have fallen over the last 3 years and were 7.4% in 2000/2001 (ref). CIN2 rates for mild dyskaryosis also remained constant at 11% to 12%. Conclusion Correlation of biopsy results with high‐ and low‐grade cytological abnormalities is a useful method of monitoring accuracy of cytology reporting, and can be used to measure over‐ and under‐reporting as surrogates for specificity and sensitivity.     

O-2Preliminary results of the ARTISTIC study: a randomised trial in screening to improve cytology

Annually in the UK around 250 000 cervical smears show low-grade abnormalities. Alternative management policies following a low-grade smear are cytological surveillance or referral for colposcopy. Their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and the potential for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to triage women to either management, has been debated. Trial of management of borderline and other low-grade abnormal smears (TOMBOLA) (a large RCT) addresses these uncertainties, considering clinical, psychosocial and economic outcomes. 4439 women aged 20–59, resident in Grampian, Tayside or Nottingham with a low-grade smear were randomised to cytological surveillance (six-monthly smears in primary care) or hospital-based colposcopy. At colposcopy, women with visible abnormality were randomised to immediate treatment or biopsy and recall for treatment if necessary. Recruitment HPV status was assessed using PCR techniques. Women were followed for three years to an exit colposcopy. Cumulative incidence of CIN2 or more severe disease (CIN2+) in the colposcopy arm was 7.9% per year, higher than in cytological surveillance (5.8%; OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.23–1.67). This difference was less marked for CIN3+ (OR = 1.27, 1.04–1.55), suggesting spontaneous regression of some CIN2, and that initial colposcopy can lead to over-treatment. There was little difference in psychosocial outcomes between arms. In comparison of biopsy and recall versus immediate treatment, there was no difference in cumulative incidence of CIN2+ or psychosocial outcomes. There was over-treatment and increased frequency/duration of bleeding with immediate treatment. There was no compelling economic reason to favour any one management method. Testing for HPV does not appear to be effective in triage. Based on these findings, we make management recommendations for women with low-grade smears.     

Detection of human papillomavirus types by the polymerase chain reaction and the differentiation between high-risk and low-risk cervical lesions.

By means of a consensus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, the prevalence of HPV types was determined in cervical biopsies from 137 women referred to the gynecological outpatient clinic for colposcopy because of an abnormal cervical smear. The prevalence of HPV was 80.3%. There was a statistically highly significant rise in the prevalence of the oncogenic HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33) with increasing severity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN I to III), indicating a role for these HPV types in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. The prevalence of other HPV types decreased significantly with the severity of the lesion, suggesting that these HPV types play a less significant role in this process. These data indicate that HPV typing with PCR may be a valuable tool for distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk cervical lesions. Furthermore, our results suggest that the detection of HPV types by consensus PCR in the cervix of patients with an abnormal smear but without histologically detectable CIN is a useful tool for predicting which of these patients will eventually develop CIN. Finally, a relatively low percentage (3%) of HPV double infections is reported in this study.     

Detection of human papillomavirus types by the polymerase chain reaction and the differentiation between high-risk and low-risk cervical lesions

By means of a consensus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, the prevalence of HPV types was determined in cervical biopsies from 137 women referred to the gynecological outpatient clinic for colposcopy because of an abnormal cervical smear. The prevalence of HPV was 80.3%. There was a statistically highly significant rise in the prevalence of the oncogenic HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33) with increasing severity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN I to III), indicating a role for these HPV types in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. The prevalence of other HPV types decreased significantly with the severity of the lesion, suggesting that these HPV types play a less significant role in this process. These data indicate that HPV typing with PCR may be a valuable tool for distinguishing between highrisk and low-risk cervical lesions. Furthermore, our results suggest that the detection of HPV types by consensus PCR in the cervix of patients with an abnormal smear but without histologically detectable CIN is a useful tool for predicting which of these patiens will eventually develop CIN. Finally, a relatively low percentage (3%) of HPV double infections is reported in this study.     

Significance of mild cervical cytologic atypia in a sexually transmitted disease clinic population

While the clinical management of patients with cytologic atypia consistent with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is well established, the management of so-called nondyskaryotic or benign atypias is controversial. The natural history of such atypias was prospectively studied in 124 patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. The benign atypias were subdivided into different categories according to the cell type involved, and the patients were followed cytologically and colposcopically without cervical biopsy until they reached one of the study end points. Benign atypias often signified the presence of CIN: 17% of the patients had a smear consistent with CIN on the first study visit, and an additional 24% had such a smear by six months of follow-up. After 30 months of follow-up, the overall cumulative rate of biopsy-confirmed CIN 2 to CIN 3 was 13.5%; it was 12.5% among those with two consecutive smears showing benign atypias. Of the ten patients who reached biopsy-confirmed CIN 2 to CIN 3, a cytologic smear consistent with CIN was obtained in less than one year of follow-up in all but one case; however, colposcopic evidence of progression was seen in only half of the ten cases, suggesting a sampling error rather than true progression in many cases. Patients with metaplastic cell atypia had a higher progression rate to biopsy-confirmed CIN 2 to CIN 3 (21%) than did those with nonmetaplastic cell atypia (3%). This study provides direct evidence of the potential significance of metaplastic atypia as a marker of CIN. We conclude that patients with mild atypia are often found to have CIN and warrant further investigation by colposcopy and biopsy.     

Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with ?glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology

A. Talaat, D. Brinkmann, J. Dhundee, Y. Hana, J. Bevan, R. Irvine, S. Bailey and R. Woolas
Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with ?glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology Objective: To review the risk of pre‐invasive and invasive gynaecological pathology in women referred with cervical cytology reporting ?glandular neoplasia. Methods: Review of the case notes of all women referred with cervical cytology reported as ?glandular neoplasia between January 1999 and December 2008 at two UK hospitals: Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust and Queen Mary’s Hospital Sidcup. The category of ‘borderline nuclear change in endocervical cells’, result code 8 according to the national health service cancer screening programme (NHSCSP), was excluded from the study. Results: A total of 200 women were identified using the hospitals’ pathology computer systems. Invasive carcinoma was found in 48 women (24%): 28 endocervical adenocarcinomas, eight squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), ten endometrial and two ovarian adenocarcinomas. Pre‐invasive neoplasia was found in 115 (57.5%), including 14 cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN), 31 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3 and 70 concomitant CGIN and CIN2/3. CIN1/HPV was found in 25, simple endometrial hyperplasia in three and no histological abnormality in three. Thirty‐four (70.8%) of 48 invasive carcinomas (of which 23 were endocervical adenocarcinomas) were in asymptomatic women investigated for abnormal cytology. Fourteen of 34 (41.4%) of those with ?glandular neoplasia thought to be endometrial were CGIN or CIN2/3. Colposcopic appearances were normal in 47.6% of women with pure cervical glandular neoplasia (adenocarcinoma or CGIN) compared with 12.8% with squamous cell lesions (CIN2/3 or SCC): P = 0.0001. Thus, colposcopy was more sensitive for detecting squamous cell abnormalities than their glandular counterparts. Although cervical adenocarcinomas are less amenable to prevention by screening than cervical SCC, in our study cervical cytology predominantly detected these abnormalities at their early asymptomatic stages. Conclusion: At least CIN2 was found in 81.5% in women referred with cervical cytology reporting ?glandular neoplasia. A thorough evaluation of the whole genital tract is needed if colposcopy is negative.     

Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Liquid based cytology (LBC) was introduced across the Scottish Cervical Screening Programme in 2003-2004. The objective of this study was to compare in a large cytopathology laboratory the results of cervical samples over two twelve-month periods, 2001-2002, when the great majority of smears were conventional, with 2003-2004, when all were LBC. METHODS: The results of smears in both periods were analysed to give overall reporting profiles, and correlated with results of cervical biopsies. The numbers of patients referred for colposcopy were compared. RESULTS: The percentage of unsatisfactory smears fell from 13.6% to 1.9%. Colposcopic referrals for repeated unsatisfactory smears fell from almost 25% to 0.5%. There was a decrease in overall smear numbers, but despite this there was an increase in the number of smears reported as showing dyskaryosis of any grade. There was an increase in positive predictive value for moderate dyskaryosis and above, from 79.5% to 86.1%. The outcome of biopsies from patients referred with mild dyskaryosis showed no decrease in accuracy of predicting a low grade histological lesion. Workload in the laboratory decreased, due to fewer smears received overall, more rapid primary screening times and fewer multi-slide cases. Primary screening backlogs all but disappeared, and reporting times greatly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of liquid based cytology led to improvements in unsatisfactory smear rates, with significant benefits to colposcopic referrals and laboratory turnaround times. Pick-up rates of dyskaryosis were maintained, and the positive predictive value of a dyskaryotic smear report was improved.     

阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查对早期宫颈上皮内瘤变诊断价值分析

目的:探究阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查对早期宫颈上皮内瘤变(cervicalintraepithelialneoplasia,CIN)的诊断价值。方法:选择2015年3月至2018年5月于我院接受诊治的543例疑似宫颈上皮瘤变患者,分别对其实施阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查,以病理学检测结果为金标准,分别评估两种方式单独检测及联合检测对早期CIN的诊断一致性、灵敏度和特异度,并进行组间对比。结果:(1)543例疑似CIN患者病理诊断早期CIN阳性患者168例,阴性患者375例,诊断率为30.94%;阴道镜对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有143例,良性患者有400例,诊断率为26.34%;宫颈活组织检测对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有159例,良性患者有384例,诊断率为29.28%;阴道镜联合颈活组织检测对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有163例,良性患者有380例,诊断率为30.02%。(2)检测发现,阴道镜对早期CIN诊断一致性为81.77%,灵敏度为60.12%,特异度为91.47%。(3)宫颈活组织对早期CIN诊断一致性为91.71%,灵敏度为83.33%,特异度为95.47%。(4)阴道镜联合宫颈活组织对早期CIN诊断一致性为96.50%,灵敏度为92.86%,特异度为98.13%。(5)联合检测对早期CIN诊断的一致性、灵敏度和特异度均明显优于阴道镜及宫颈活组织单独检测。结论:阴道镜及宫颈活组织检测对早期CIN具有较好的诊断效果,但联合检测诊断准确率更高,适用于早期CIN临床筛查中。     

A prospective study of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to resolve uncertainty in colposcopy

J. Bowring, R. Albrow, A. Fisher, G. Downey, J. Cullimore, J. Patnick, P.G. Walker and H.C. Kitchener
A prospective study of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to resolve uncertainty in colposcopy Objective: UK colposcopy services are seeing increased workloads, a large proportion of which are follow‐up appointments. The English Cervical Screening Programme HPV Special Interest Group identified five subcategories of colposcopy clinic patients who often require prolonged follow‐up regimes for low‐grade abnormalities. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has a high negative predictive value, meaning that HPV‐negative women are at very low risk of underlying disease. Our objectives were to quantify the number of HPV‐negative women in each study subcategory and to evaluate the number who could potentially be discharged from colposcopy on the basis of their results. Methods: Four colposcopy clinics prospectively identified women according to five categories over 12 months. All women underwent cytological testing and high‐risk HPV (hrHPV) testing using the Hybrid Capture 2 test. Management outcomes and decisions based on a knowledge of the HPV status were recorded. Results: Data available on 755 women showed that 422/755 (55.9%) and 260/755 (34.4%) had persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) (Category 1) or a minor abnormality following treatment (Category 2), respectively. In Categories 1 and 2, 51.7% and 60.2%, respectively, were hrHPV negative. The rates with biopsies of CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) across the two categories were 3/355 (0.8%) and 21/291 (7.0%) for hrHPV‐negative and hrHPV‐positive women, respectively. Conclusion: The incorporation of hrHPV testing within organized cervical screening programmes has been widely accepted. hrHPV testing for the clinical scenarios outlined in this study detects women who are hrHPV negative and therefore at low risk of underlying disease, potentially reducing anxiety and inconvenience for women and costs to colposcopy services.     

Long-term follow-up of patients following negative colposcopy: a new gold standard and its implications for cervical screening

From 1189 colposcopy referrals in 1997 at a single cervical screening centre, 88 women who had no biopsy taken at colposcopy (negative colposcopy) were identified. We followed up these women for a maximum of 4 years and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) of a single smear before and after follow-up. Using slide review we attempted to correlate the grade of smear leading to colposcopy referral with final outcome. Our results showed that long-term follow-up alters the PPV of cervical cytology. Analysis showed a strong correlation between the review grade of the referring smear and the final outcome after follow-up. From these results we suggest an evidence-based protocol for cervical screening follow-up after negative colposcopy.     

A Retrospective Analysis of 94 Patients With Cin and False Negative Cervical Smears Taken At Colposcopy

This report investigates the reasons for false negative cervical cytology in 94 out of 630 patients (15%) in whom cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was diagnosed on colposcopically directed biopsy. Cervical smears were taken immediately before biopsy and the cases with false negative cytology were compared with those whose cytology was abnormal. Patients with false negative cytology were more likely to have been younger (P < 0.01), to have had fewer pregnancies (P < 0.001), to have had a less severe grade of dyskaryosis on their referral smear (P < 0.001), to have had no endocervical cells on the smear (P < 0.05), to have had a less severe grade of CIN on biopsy (P < 0.001), to have had no punctation visible at colposcopy (P < 0.01), and to have had no mosaic pattern seen at colposcopy (P < 0.05). We found no effect attributable to the patient's menstrual history, the interval between referral smear and colposcopy clinic visit, the smear taker or the type of spatula used to take the smear.