The treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer: docetaxel and beyond

Two randomized clinical trials demonstrated a survival benefit of 20% to 24% with docetaxel-based therapy when compared with survival with mitoxantrone and prednisone after failure of androgen ablation therapy. These studies supported the approval of docetaxel-based therapy for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2005. Clinical trials in hormone-refractory prostate cancer are now focused on building on the survival improvement seen with docetaxel-based therapy. This article presents a summary of some of the more promising treatments and regimens for advanced prostate cancer.     

Docetaxel for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Chemotherapy has historically proven toxic and ineffective for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), a disease with substantial morbidity and mortality. Progress has been made in symptom relief, and the combination of mitoxantrone and prednisone is considered the palliative standard of care. The effects of a variety of chemotherapeutic agents, both alone and in combination, on prostate-specific antigen decline rates, measurable disease response, and survival have been examined in numerous phase I and II trials. Results suggest that combining vinblastine or paclitaxel with estramustine confers a survival advantage over either agent alone. In addition, docetaxel-based therapy has been found to be effective and well tolerated, and phase III trials will soon determine whether docetaxel-based therapy should replace mitoxantrone-based therapy as the standard of care for HRPC.     

Current standard and investigational approaches to the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a common cause of death in men and remains incurable in the metastatic setting. In 2004, 2 landmark trials using docetaxel-based chemotherapy, TAX 327 and SWOG 99-16, showed a survival benefit for the first time in metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Current research suggests that several distinct mechanisms of androgen-refractory disease may converge in patients with disease progression on androgen deprivation therapy. These findings have identified several potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Current standard and investigational treatment options for this disease are discussed, including chemotherapy and rapidly evolving therapies in phase II/III trials involving antiangiogenic therapies, signal transduction inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and nuclear receptor targets. In light of a growing array of treatment options and an increasingly chronic natural history, this review supports a multidisciplinary care approach to these patients, including medical oncologists, urologists, and radiation oncologists, to optimize survival and quality of life.     

Clinical experience with gene therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer

Localized prostate cancer can be treated effectively with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. The treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer are limited to hormonal therapy; hormone-refractory cancer is treated with taxane-based chemotherapy, which provides only a modest survival benefit. New treatments are needed. The gene for the initiation of prostate cancer has not been identified; however, gene therapy can involve tumor injection of a gene to kill cells, systemic gene delivery to target and kill metastases, or local gene expression intended to generate a systemic response. This review will provide an overview of the various strategies of cancer gene therapy, focusing on those that have gone to clinical trial, detailing clinical experience in prostate cancer patients.     

Innovative therapies for prostate cancer treatment

Androgen ablation is effective therapy for metastatic prostate cancer, but the majority of men eventually become refractory to this intervention. Cytotoxic chemotherapy offers palliation to symptomatic patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC); however, no chemotherapy regimen has yet been shown to prolong survival. There is a clear need for new agents and drug targets for the treatment of HRPC. A number of innovative therapeutic approaches that are rationally based and target driven are under investigation. This article reviews the development of antisense oligonucleotides that inhibit the anti-apoptotic bcL-2 protein. Approaches that target the epidermal growth factor receptor, the platelet derived growth factor receptor, and nuclear factor kappa-B are also discussed. There is much expectation that these therapies alone or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy will impact the clinical outcome of patients with HRPC.     

Endocrine treatment of prostate cancer

Although androgen deprivation as a treatment for patients with prostate cancer was described more than 60 years ago its optimal use remains controversial. The widespread use of prostate-specific (PSA) assay has lead to earlier diagnosis and earlier detection of recurrent disease. This means that the systemic side effects of androgen deprivation and quality of life have become more important. Debates continue regarding the proper use and timing of endocrine therapy with orchiectomy, oestrogen agonists, gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, GnRH antagonists, and androgen antagonists. A critical review of the literature was performed. Data support that androgen deprivation is an effective treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer. However, although it improves survival, it is not curative, and creates a spectrum of unwanted effects that influence quality of life. Castration remains the frontline treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, where orchiectomy, oestrogen agonists and GnRH agonists produce equivalent clinical responses. Maximum androgen blockade (MAB) is not significantly more effective than single agent GnRH agonist or orchiectomy. Nonsteroidal antiandrogen monotherapy is as effective as castration in treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer offering quality of life benefits. Adjuvant endocrine treatment is able to delay disease progression at any stage. There is, however, controversy of the possible survival benefit of such treatment, including patients having PSA relapse after definitive local treatment for prostate cancer. Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment has its place mainly in the external beam radiotherapy setting. Intermittent androgen blockade is still considered experimental. The decision regarding the type of androgen deprivation should be made individually after informing the patient of all available treatment options, including watchful waiting, and on the basis of potential benefits and adverse effects. Several large studies are under way to investigate the role of adjuvant endocrine treatment in the field of early prostate cancer, intermittent androgen deprivation and endocrine therapy alone compared with endocrine therapy with radiotherapy. The real challenge, however, is to develop better means to avert hormone-refractory prostate cancer and better treatments for patients with hormone-refractory disease when it occurs.     

Adenoviral gene therapy, radiation, and prostate cancer

Viral gene therapy has exceptional potential as a specifically tailored cancer treatment. However, enthusiasm for cancer gene therapy has varied over the years, partly owing to safety concerns after the death of a young volunteer in a clinical trial for a genetic disease. Since this singular tragedy, results from numerous clinical trials over the past 10 years have restored the excellent safety profile of adenoviral vectors. These vectors have been extensively studied in phase I and II trials as intraprostatically administered agents for patients with locally recurrent and high-risk local prostate cancer. Promising therapeutic responses have been reported in several studies with both oncolytic and suicide gene therapy strategies. The additional benefit of combining gene therapy with radiation therapy has also been realized; replicating adenoviruses inhibit DNA repair pathways, resulting in a synergistic sensitization to radiation. Other, nonreplicating suicide gene therapy strategies are also significantly enhanced with radiation. Combined radiation/gene therapy is currently being studied in phase I and II clinical trials and will likely be the first adenoviral gene therapy mechanism to become available to urologists in the clinic. Systemic gene therapy for metastatic disease is also a major goal of the field, and clinical trials are currently under way for hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Second- and third-generation "re-targeted" viral vectors, currently being developed in the laboratory, are likely to further improve these systemic trials.     

Cancer and bone repair mechanism: clinical applications for hormone refractory prostate cancer

It is a long-standing clinical observation that the bone corresponds to the prevalent site for metastatic growth of prostate cancer. In addition, bone metastases of this malignancy produce a potent blastic reaction, in contrast to the overwhelming majority of other osteotropic neoplasms, whose metastases are generally associated with an osteolytic reaction. Osteoblastic metastases represent almost always the first and, frequently, the exclusive site of disease progression to hormone refractory stage, stage D3. Moreover, the number of skeletal metastatic foci is the most powerful independent prognostic factor associated with a limited response to hormone ablation therapy and poor survival of advanced prostate cancer. It is noteworthy that disease progression to hormone refractory stage occurs almost always in osteoblastic metastases. These clinical observations suggested that the osteoblastic reaction is possibly not an innocent bystander of the metastatic prostate tumour growth, simply suffering its consequences, but it may in fact facilitate the efforts of metastatic cells to expand their population. An extensive line of research in the pathophysiology of osteoblastic metastases has established that the local blastic reaction involves the uPA/plasmin/IGF/IGFBP-3/TGFbs bioregulation system which can stimulate both the growth of osteoblasts and prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, we were the first to characterize osteoblast-derived 'survival factors' able to rescue metastatic prostate cancer cells from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. These data resulted in the development of a novel concept of an anti-survival factor therapy, namely an anti-IGF-1 therapy, which has provided encouraging preliminary data in a phase II clinical trial with terminally-ill hormone/chemotherapy-resistant prostate cancer patients.     

Circadian chemotherapy for gynecological and genitourinary cancers

The circadian timing of surgery, anticancer drugs, radiation therapy, and biologic agents can result in improved toxicity profiles, tumor control, and host survival. Optimally timed cancer chemotherapy with doxorubicin or pirarubicin (06:00h) and cisplatin (18:00h) enhanced the control of advanced ovarian cancer while minimizing side effects, and increased the response rate in metastatic endometrial cancer. Therapy of metastatic bladder cancer with doxorubicin–cisplatin was made more tolerable by this same circadian approach resulting in a 57% objective response rate. This optimally timed therapy is also effective in the adjuvant setting, decreasing the expected frequency of metastasis from locally advanced bladder cancer. Circadian fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) continuous infusion (70% of the daily dose given between 15:00h and 21:00h) has been shown effective for metastatic renal cell carcinoma resulting in 29% objective response and stable disease of more than 1 yr duration in the majority of patients. Toxicity is reduced markedly when FUDR infusion is modulated to circadian rhythms. In a multicenter trial in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, patients were randomized to a flat or a circadian-modified FUDR infusion. This study confirmed a significant difference in toxicity and dose intensity, favoring the circadian-modified group. Hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer has been treated with circadian-timed FUDR chemotherapy; however, without objective response. Biological agents such as interferon-α and IL-2 have shown low but effective disease control in metastatic renal cell cancer, however, with much toxicity. Each of these cytokines shows circadian stage dependent toxicity and efficacy in model systems. In summary, the timing of anthracycline, platinum, and fluoropyrimidine-based drug therapies during the 24h is relevant to the toxic–therapeutic ratio of these agents in the treatment of gynecologic and genitourinary cancers.     

Circadian chemotherapy for gynecological and genitourinary cancers

The circadian timing of surgery, anticancer drugs, radiation therapy, and biologic agents can result in improved toxicity profiles, tumor control, and host survival. Optimally timed cancer chemotherapy with doxorubicin or pirarubicin (06:00h) and cisplatin (18:00h) enhanced the control of advanced ovarian cancer while minimizing side effects, and increased the response rate in metastatic endometrial cancer. Therapy of metastatic bladder cancer with doxorubicin-cisplatin was made more tolerable by this same circadian approach resulting in a 57% objective response rate. This optimally timed therapy is also effective in the adjuvant setting, decreasing the expected frequency of metastasis from locally advanced bladder cancer. Circadian fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) continuous infusion (70% of the daily dose given between 15:00h and 21:00h) has been shown effective for metastatic renal cell carcinoma resulting in 29% objective response and stable disease of more than 1 yr duration in the majority of patients. Toxicity is reduced markedly when FUDR infusion is modulated to circadian rhythms. In a multicenter trial in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, patients were randomized to a flat or a circadian-modified FUDR infusion. This study confirmed a significant difference in toxicity and dose intensity, favoring the circadian-modified group. Hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer has been treated with circadian-timed FUDR chemotherapy; however, without objective response. Biological agents such as interferon-alpha and IL-2 have shown low but effective disease control in metastatic renal cell cancer, however, with much toxicity. Each of these cytokines shows circadian stage dependent toxicity and efficacy in model systems. In summary, the timing of anthracycline, platinum, and fluoropyrimidine-based drug therapies during the 24h is relevant to the toxic therapeutic ratio of these agents in the treatment of gynecologic and genitourinary cancers.     

Treatment options for hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer is a disease that includes a variety of patients and represents a treatment dilemma for the practicing physician. Because of the diversity of this group, management strategies must be targeted to the clinical situations of the individual patients and their wishes. This article outlines a logical progression of treatment choices that currently exist in this rapidly evolving field, and the landmark chemotherapy trials involving docetaxel (SWOG 9916 and TAX 327) are reviewed. Although significant progress has been made in understanding and treating hormone-refractory prostate cancer, current treatments do not yet provide a cure, and important clinical trials continue to recruit patients.     

Specific Pomegranate Juice Components as Potential Inhibitors of Prostate Cancer Metastasis

Pomegranate juice (PJ) is a natural product that inhibits prostate cancer progression. A clinical trial on patients with recurrent prostate cancer resulted in none of the patients progressing to a metastatic stage during the period of the trial. We have previously found that, in addition to causing cell death of hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells, PJ also markedly increases adhesion and decreases migration of the cells that do not die. However, because PJ is a very complex mixture of components and is found in many different formulations, it is important to identify specific components that are effective in inhibiting growth and metastasis. Here, we show that the PJ components luteolin, ellagic acid, and punicic acid together inhibit growth of hormone-dependent and hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells and inhibit their migration and their chemotaxis toward stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF1α), a chemokine that is important in prostate cancer metastasis to the bone. These components also increase the expression of cell adhesion genes and decrease expression of genes involved in cell cycle control and cell migration. Furthermore, they increase several well-known tumor-suppression microRNAs (miRNAs), decrease several oncogenic miRNAs, and inhibit the chemokines receptor type 4 (CXCR4)/SDF1α chemotaxis axis. Our results suggest that these components may be more effective in inhibiting prostate cancer growth and metastasis than simply drinking the juice. Chemical modification of these components could further enhance their bioavailability and efficacy of treatment. Moreover, because the mechanisms of metastasis are similar for most cancers, these PJ components may also be effective in the treatment of metastasis of other cancers.     

Oblimersen Bcl-2 antisense: facilitating apoptosis in anticancer treatment

The components of the apoptotic program are targets for anticancer therapy. Bcl-2 protein inhibits apoptosis and confers resistance to treatment with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Oblimersen sodium (G3139, Genasense, Genta Inc., Berkeley Heights, NJ) is an antisense oligonucleotide (AS-ON) compound designed to specifically bind to the first 6 codons of the human bcl-2 mRNA sequence, resulting in degradation of bcl-2 mRNA and subsequent decrease in Bcl-2 protein translation. Oblimersen is the first oligonucleotide to demonstrate proof of principle of an antisense effect in human tumors by the documented downregulation of the target Bcl-2 protein. A growing body of preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that oblimersen synergizes with many cytotoxic and biologic/immunotherapeutic agents against a variety of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Randomized clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oblimersen in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, malignant melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, nonrandomized trials are under way to evaluate oblimersen in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Preclinical data also support the clinical evaluation of oblimersen in additional tumor types, including chronic myelogenous leukemia and breast, small cell lung, gastric, colon, bladder, and Merkel cell cancers. Enhancement of the efficacy of anticancer treatments with oblimersen Bcl-2 antisense therapy represents a promising new apoptosis-modulating strategy, and ongoing clinical trials will test this therapeutic approach.     

CIL-102 interacts with microtubule polymerization and causes mitotic arrest following apoptosis in the human prostate cancer PC-3 cell line

There have been no therapeutic agents that provide a survival advantage in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved docetaxel combined with prednisone for the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer, and it does show a survival benefit. Hence, anti-microtubule drugs might be of benefit in chemotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. We used metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer PC-3 cells to investigate potential molecular mechanisms for CIL-102, a semisynthetic alkaloid derivative. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenylte-trazolium bromide and sulforhodamine B assays indicated that CIL-102 inhibits cell growth dose-dependently. Immunofluorescence microscopy and in vitro tubulin assembly assays indicated that CIL-102 binds to tubulin and disrupts microtubule organization. Flow cytometry showed that CIL-102 causes cells to accumulate in G(2)/M phase and sub-G(0)/G(1) phase. CIL-102-induced apoptosis was also characterized by immunofluorescence microscopy. Western blotting and kinase assays showed that CIL-102 exposure induced up-regulation of cyclin B1 and p34(cdc2) kinase activity and olomoucine, a p34(cdc2) inhibitor, profoundly reduced the number of cells accumulated in mitotic phase. Moreover, Bcl-2 phosphorylation, Cdc25C phosphorylation, and survivin expression were increased. CIL-102-induced apoptosis was associated with activation of caspase-3, but a noncaspase pathway may also be involved, since benzyloxycarbonyl-VAD-fluoromethyl ketone, a pancaspase inhibitor, only partially inhibited the apoptosis, and apoptosis-inducing factor was translocated from mitochondria to cytosol. We conclude that CIL-102 induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by binding to tubulin and inhibiting tubulin polymerization. CIL-102 causes mitotic arrest, at least partly, by modulating cyclin-dependent kinases and then apoptosis executed by caspase and noncaspase pathways.     

Flavonoid compounds in maintenance of prostate health and prevention and treatment of cancer

Compounds based on a flavonoid (di-phenolic) ring structure are emerging as a potentially important new class of pharmaceutical compounds with a broad range of biological activities, most prominent of which are their potential role as anticancer agents. These compounds exert a wide range of upregulating and downregulating effects on signal transduction processes within cells in both plants and animals. The observation that human communities, which consume large quantities of these compounds (legume-based vegetarian diets), have a lower incidence of many degenerative diseases and some cancers has led to the speculation that these compounds, or synthetic analogs, may be of therapeutic value. This article reviews the evidence supporting this hypothesis and provides some examples of attempts to develop new therapeutics based on dietary isoflavones or novel isoflavonoid structures in maintaining prostate health and in cancer treatment and management. One of these compounds, phenoxodiol, is now in human clinical trials and has shown promise in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer where the cancer is refractory or resistant to standard chemotherapy, and in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.     

In Vivo Targeting of ADAM9 Gene Expression Using Lentivirus-Delivered shRNA Suppresses Prostate Cancer Growth by Regulating REG4 Dependent Cell Cycle Progression

Cancer cells respond to stress by activating a variety of survival signaling pathways. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) 9 is upregulated during cancer progression and hormone therapy, functioning in part through an increase in reactive oxygen species. Here, we present in vitro and in vivo evidence that therapeutic targeting of ADAM9 gene expression by lentivirus-delivered small hairpin RNA (shRNA) significantly inhibited proliferation of human prostate cancer cell lines and blocked tumor growth in a murine model of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Cell cycle studies confirmed an increase in the G1-phase and decrease in the S-phase population of cancer cells under starvation stress conditions, which correlated with elevated intracellular superoxide levels. Microarray data showed significantly decreased levels of regenerating islet-derived family member 4 (REG4) expression in prostate cancer cells with knockdown of ADAM9 gene expression. This REG4 downregulation also resulted in induction of expression of p21^Cip1/WAF1, which negatively regulates cyclin D1 and blocks the G1/S transition. Our data reveal a novel molecular mechanism of ADAM9 in the regulation of prostate cancer cell proliferation, and suggests a combined modality of ADAM9 shRNA gene therapy and cytotoxic agents for hormone refractory and bone metastatic prostate cancer.     

The role of the urologist in treating patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Objectives: To ascertain what percentage of urologists' oncology practice is dedicated to the care of prostate cancer patients and to determine urologists' attitudes towards the treatment of patients with metastatic and hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). An additional objective is to determine urologists' interest in administering various types of chemotherapy in HRPC patients.Materials and Methods: The American Urological Association (AUA) directory of practicing urologists was obtained, and 3000 randomly selected members of the AUA, as well as the complete list of 168 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) members, were chosen for the mailing of a 16-item questionnaire. The urologists were asked about how many of their patients have prostate cancer, how many have metastatic disease, and how many have HRPC and are currently receiving intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. In addition, the urologists were queried regarding their level of interest in learning about chemotherapy options as well as learning how to administer chemotherapy.Results: A total of 654 survey questionnaires were completed and returned for tabulation, resulting in a 21% effective response rate. Sixty-four percent of the responding urologists' cancer patients had prostate cancer, 21% had metastatic disease, and 19% had HRPC; only 4% of the urologists currently administer IV chemotherapy themselves. When asked to describe their interest in learning how to deliver and be reimbursed for IV chemotherapy, 26% expressed an extremely low level of interest, 23% a low level of interest, 31% a high level of interest, and 17% an extremely high level of interest. The results of other questions are presented and correlated with the number of years the urologists have been in practice and other demographic data.Conclusions: The management of prostate cancer comprises a major portion of urologists' practices. Almost one half (48%) of the urologists in this survey were interested in administering and being reimbursed for IV chemotherapy. Several chemotherapy regimens have been shown to improve quality of life in patients with HRPC, yet only about 30% of these patients were referred for chemotherapy. If more urologists were able to deliver these drugs, then the number of patients referred for chemotherapy would likely increase, as would accrual to important clinical trials in HRPC. The results of this survey suggest that methods to implement the training and reimbursement of urologists in the use of chemotherapy regimens should be investigated.     

Emerging pharmacologic therapies for prostate cancer

The last decade has seen explosive growth in the therapy of prostate cancer. Three areas of therapeutics are emerging: 1) new compounds with novel uses; 2) available compounds with new applications; and 3) new compounds applied to established indications. The novel compounds target specific receptor sites of cancer pathways and attack cancer cells with less effect on normal tissue. Earlyphase trials with compounds targeting the endothelin-A and EGF receptors have shown encouraging results in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In addition, the Early Prostate Cancer Trial of over 8000 men is currently underway to determine the benefit of adjuvant androgen ablation with bicalutamide in men with localized prostate cancer. Early results show a significant 42% reduction in the progression of the disease in the bicalutamide treatment arm. Further, in large, phase 3 clinical trials in patients needing androgen ablation, the GnRH antagonist abarelix caused no testosterone surge and demonstrated a significantly more rapid decline in serum testosterone to the castrate level than did an LHRH agonist analogue. Abarelix should thus have application as a monotherapy in patients who need a rapid onset of action or are at high risk of complications from the clinical flare seen with LHRH agonists. Abarelix also uniquely caused a sustained decline in serum FSH levels, which have been shown in vitro to stimulate prostate cancer cell growth. If these favorable effects can be duplicated in patients, abarelix might also offer a survival benefit.     

Cancer de prostate métastatique : prise en charge

Current data have demonstrated that the incidence and mortality induced by prostate cancer increases with age. Natural history of prostate cancer extends on 10 to 15 years. As shown by randomized trials on screening, PSA measurements lead to early detection of localised cancer and explain the decrease number of metastatic disease which remains frequent in the elderly. However, patients with bone metastasis present painful symptomatology and a poor quality of life. This disease is hormone-sensitive during 18 to 24 months, before it becomes androgen-resistant. Considering epidemiologic and life expectancy data, we can expect an increasing number of patients with an hormonal blocking and it is important to develop alternative treatments to improve the prognosis of this disease which remains poor at the metastatic stage.     

Biochemical-markers for the diagnosis of bone metastasis: a clinical review

The preferential metastasis of cancer cells to skeleton not only disrupts the process of bone remodeling and influences the therapeutic decision, but also results in severe complications. Although the current diagnosis of bone metastases (BM) relies on bone imaging techniques, they are not sensitive enough for early detection as well as they are invasive and expensive to use. Since factors derived from bone metabolism are potentially useful to diagnose metastatic bone disease in cancer patients, a number of clinical trials have been carried out on this area. Results suggest that higher levels of bone biomarkers are associated with an increased risk of BM. As a result, biochemical-markers are showing prospects in early diagnosis of BM. This review summarizes the available evidence on the clinical use of biochemical-markers in the diagnosis of various cancers with high incidence of BM including breast, prostate and lung.