Induction of heat shock proteins in Chinese hamster ovary cells and development of thermotolerance by intermediate concentrations of puromycin

During 4 hr after puromycin (PUR: 20 micrograms/ml) treatment, the synthesis of three major heat shock protein families (HSPs: Mr = 110,000, 87,000, and 70,000) was enhanced 1.5-fold relative to that of untreated cells, as studied by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The increase of unique HSPs, if studied with two-dimensional gels, would probably be much greater. In parallel, thermotolerance was observed at 10(-3) isosurvival as a thermotolerance ratio (TTR) of either 2 or greater than 5 after heating at either 45.5 degrees C or 43 degrees C, respectively. However, thermotolerance was induced by only intermediate concentrations (3-30 micrograms/ml) of puromycin that inhibited protein synthesis by 15-80%; a high concentration of PUR (100 micrograms/ml) that inhibited protein synthesis by 95% did not induce either HSPs or thermotolerance. Also, thermotolerance was never induced by any concentration (0.01-10 micrograms/ml) of cycloheximide that inhibited protein synthesis by 5-94%. Furthermore, after PUR (20 micrograms/ml) treatment, the addition of cycloheximide (CHM: 10 micrograms/ml), at a concentration that reduces protein synthesis by 94%, inhibited both thermotolerance and synthesis of HSP families. Thus, thermotolerance induced by intermediate concentrations of PUR correlated with an increase in newly synthesized HSP families. This thermotolerance phenomenon was compared with another phenomenon termed heat resistance and observed when cells were heated at 43 degrees C in the presence of CHM or PUR immediately after a 2-hr pretreatment with CHM or PUR. Heat protection increased with inhibition of synthesis of both total protein and HSP families. Moreover, this heat protection decayed rapidly as the interval between pretreatment and heating increased to 1-2 hr, and did not have any obvious relationship to the synthesis of HSP families. Therefore, there are two distinctly different pathways for developing thermal resistance. The first is thermotolerance after intermediate concentrations of PUR treatment, and it requires incubation after treatment and apparently the synthesis of HSP families. The second is resistance to heat after CHM or PUR treatment immediately before and during heating at 43 degrees C, and it apparently does not require synthesis of HSP families. This second pathway not requiring the synthesis of HSP families also was observed by the increase in thermotolerance at 45.5 degrees C caused by heating at 43 degrees C after cells were incubated for 2-4 hr following pretreatment with an intermediate concentration of PUR.     

Thermotolerance induced by heat, sodium arsenite, or puromycin: its inhibition and differences between 43 degrees C and 45 degrees C

When CHO cells were treated either for 10 min at 45-45.5 degrees C or for 1 hr with 100 microM sodium arsenite (ARS) or for 2 hr with 20 micrograms/ml puromycin (PUR-20), they became thermotolerant to a heat treatment at 45-45.5 degrees C administered 4-14 hr later, with thermotolerance ratios at 10(-3) isosurvival of 4-6, 2-3.2, and 1.7, respectively. These treatments caused an increase in synthesis of HSP families (70, 87, and 110 kDa) relative to total protein synthesis. However, for a given amount of thermotolerance, the ARS and PUR-20 treatments induced 4 times more synthesis than the heat treatment. This decreased effectiveness of the ARS treatment may occur because ARS has been reported to stimulate minimal redistribution of HSP-70 to the nucleus and nucleolus. Inhibiting protein synthesis with cycloheximide (CHM, 10 micrograms/ml) or PUR (100 micrograms/ml) after the initial treatments greatly inhibited thermotolerance to 45-45.5 degrees C in all cases. However, for a challenge at 43 degrees C, thermotolerance was inhibited only for the ARS and PUR-20 treatments. CHM did not suppress heat-induced thermotolerance to 43 degrees C, which was the same as heat protection observed when CHM was added before and during heating at 43 degrees C without the initial heat treatment. These differences between the initial treatments and between 43 and 45 degrees C may possibly be explained by reports that show that heat causes more redistribution of HSP-70 to the nucleus and nucleolus than ARS and that redistribution of HSP-70 can occur during heating at 42 degrees C with or without the presence of CHM. Heating cells at 43 degrees C for 5 hr after thermotolerance had developed induced additional thermotolerance, as measured with a challenge at 45 degrees C immediately after heating at 43 degrees C. Compared to the nonthermotolerant cells, thermotolerance ratios were 10 for the ARS treatment and 8.5 for the initial heat treatment. Adding CHM (10 micrograms/ml) or PUR (100 micrograms/ml) to inhibit protein synthesis during heating at 43 degrees C did not greatly reduce this additional thermotolerance. If, however, protein synthesis was inhibited between the initial heat treatment and heating at 43 degrees C, protein synthesis was required during 43 degrees C for the development of additional thermotolerance to 45 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Protection of Chinese hamster ovary cells from heat killing by treatment with cycloheximide or puromycin: involvement of HSPs?

Cycloheximide (CHM) or puromycin (PUR) added for 2 h before heating at 43 degrees C followed by either PUR or CHM during heat greatly protected cells from heat killing. This protection increased with inhibition of protein synthesis. Since treatment with a drug both before and during heating was required for heat protection, and since one drug could be exchanged for the other after the 2-h pretreatment without affecting the heat protection, a common mode of action involving inhibition of protein synthesis is suggested for the two drugs. Drug treatment reduced the synthesis of heat-shock proteins (HSPs) as studied by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis by 80-98% relative to 37 degrees C untreated controls. Synthesis of large molecules (greater than 30 kDa) was preferentially inhibited by PUR but not by CHM. Also for CHM, but not for PUR treatment, a 42 kDa band appeared along with a great reduction in the 43 kDa actin band during CHM treatment at both 37 and 43 degrees C. Furthermore, during CHM or PUR treatment, incorporation of [35S]methionine into HSP families 70, 87, or 110 was not increased relative to incorporation into total protein. However, synthesis of the 70 kDa HSP family was selectively suppressed when cells were incubated at 37 degrees C after CHM treatment, but when cells were incubated at 37 degrees C after treatment at 43 degrees C with CHM, synthesis of the 70 kDa HSP family resumed. When cells were labeled for 3 days, there was no preferential accumulation or turnover of HSP families during heating with or without CHM. Therefore, heat protection caused by treatment with CHM or PUR apparently involves a common mode of action not associated with changes in either total levels or synthesis of HSP families during drug treatment before and during heating. The significance of the changes observed in the synthesis of the HSP 70 family after heat is unknown. As thermotolerance developed during 5 h at 42 degrees C without drugs, synthesis of HSP families 70, 87, and 110, as studied with one-dimensional gels, increased 1.4-fold relative to synthesis of total protein, but compared to HSP families in cells labeled for 5 h at 37 degrees C incorporation was reduced by 40%. The increase of unique HSPs, if studied with two-dimensional gels, would probably be much greater.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Differences in thermotolerance induced by heat or sodium arsenite: correlation between redistribution of a 26-kDa protein and development of protein synthesis-independent thermotolerance in CHO cells

In previous studies, we have demonstrated the differences in thermotolerance induced by heat and sodium arsenite (Lee et al., Radiat. Res. 121, 295-303, 1990). In this study, we investigated whether a 26-kDa protein might play an important role in evincing these differences. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells treated for either 1 h with 100 microM sodium arsenite (ARS) or 10 min at 45.5 degrees C became thermotolerant to a test heat treatment at 43 degrees C administered 6 or 12 h later, respectively. After the test heating at 43 degrees C for 1.5 h, the level of 26-kDa protein in the nucleus was decreased by 92% in nonthermotolerant cells, 78% in ARS-induced thermotolerant cells, and 3% in heat-induced thermotolerant cells. Inhibiting protein synthesis with cycloheximide (CHM, 10 micrograms/ml) after ARS treatment eliminated thermotolerance to 43 degrees C and delayed restoration of the 26-kDa protein in the nucleus. In contrast, CHM neither prevented the development of thermotolerance nor inhibited the restoration of the 26-kDa protein in heat-induced thermotolerant cells. However, when cells were exposed to cold (4 degrees C), immediately after initial heating, restoration of the 26-kDa protein and development of thermotolerance did not occur. These results demonstrate a good correlation between the restoration and/or the presence of this 26-kDa protein and the development of protein synthesis-independent thermotolerance.     

Differences in thermotolerance induced by heat or sodium arsenite: cell killing and inhibition of protein synthesis

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells became thermotolerant after treatment with either heat for 10 min at 45.5 degrees C or incubation in 100 microM sodium arsenite for 1 h at 37 degrees C. Thermotolerance was tested using heat treatment at 45 degrees C or 43 degrees C administered 6-12 h after the inducing agent. At 45 degrees C thermotolerance ratios at 10(-2) isosurvival levels were 4.2 and 3.8 for heat and sodium arsenite, respectively. Recovery from heat damage as measured by resumption of protein synthesis was more rapid in heat-induced thermotolerant cells than in either sodium arsenite-induced thermotolerant cells or nonthermotolerant cells. Differences in inhibition of protein synthesis between heat-induced thermotolerant cells and sodium arsenite-induced thermotolerant cells were also evident after test heating at 43 degrees C for 5 h. At this temperature heat-induced thermotolerant cells were protected immediately from inhibition of protein synthesis, whereas sodium arsenite-induced thermotolerant cells, while initially suppressed, gradually recovered within 24 h. Furthermore, adding cycloheximide during the thermotolerance development period greatly inhibited sodium arsenite-induced thermotolerance (SF less than 10(-6] but not heat-induced thermotolerance (SF = 1.7 X 10(-1] when tested with 43 degrees C for 5 h. Our results suggest that both the development of thermotolerance and the thermotolerant state for the two agents, while similar in terms of survival, differed significantly for several parameters associated with protein synthesis.     

Relationship between thermal tolerance and protein degradation in temperature-sensitive mouse cells.

The induction of thermotolerance was studied in a temperature sensitive mouse cell line, ts85, and results were compared with those for the wild-type FM3A cells. At the nonpermissive temperature of 39 degrees C, ts85 cells are defective in the degradation of short-lived abnormal proteins, apparently because of loss of activity of a ubiquitin-activating enzyme. The failure of the ts85 cells to develop thermotolerance to 41-43 degrees C after incubation at the nonpermissive temperature of 39 degrees C correlated with the failure of the cells to degrade short-lived abnormal proteins at 39 degrees C. However, the failure of the ts85 cells to develop thermotolerance to 43 degrees C during incubation at 33 degrees C after either arsenite treatment or heating at 45.5 degrees C for 6 or 10 min did not correlate with protein degradation rates. Although the rate of degrading abnormal protein was reduced after heating at 45.5 degrees C for 10 min, the rates were normal after arsenite treatment or heating at 45.5 degrees C for 6 min. In addition, when protein synthesis was inhibited with cycloheximide both during incubation at 33 degrees C or 39 degrees C and during heating at 41-43 degrees C, resistance to heating was observed, but protein degradation rates at 39 degrees C or 43 degrees C were not altered by the cycloheximide treatment. Therefore, there is apparently no consistent relationship between rates of degrading abnormal proteins and the ability of cells to develop thermotolerance and resistance to heating in the presence of cycloheximide.     

Differences in preferential synthesis and redistribution of HSP70 and HSP28 families by heat or sodium arsenite in Chinese hamster ovary cells

Since both heat and sodium arsenite induce thermotolerance, we investigated the differences in synthesis and redistribution of stress proteins induced by these agents in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Five major heat shock proteins (HSPs; Mr 110, 87, 70, 28, and 8.5 kDa) were preferentially synthesized after heat for 10 min at 45.5 degrees C, whereas four major HSPs (Mr 110, 87, 70, and 28 kDa) and one stress protein (33.3 kDa) were preferentially synthesized after treatment with 100 microM sodium arsenite (ARS) for 1 hr. Two HSP families (HSP70a,b,c, and HSP28a,b,c) preferentially relocalized in the nucleus after heat shock. In contrast, only HSP70b redistributed into the nucleus after ARS treatment. Furthermore, the kinetics of synthesis of each member of HSP70 and HSP28 families and their redistribution were different after these treatments. The maximum rates of synthesis of HSP70 and HSP28 families, except HSP28c, were 6-9 hr after heat shock, whereas those of HSP70b and HSP28b,c were 0-2 hr after ARS treatment. In addition, the maximum rates of redistribution of HSP70 and HSP28 families occurred 3-6 hr after heat shock, whereas that of HSP70b occurred immediately after ARS treatment. The degree of redistribution of HSP70b after ARS treatment was significantly less than that after heat treatment. These results suggest that heat treatment but not sodium arsenite treatment stimulates the entry of HSP70 and HSP28 families into the nucleus.     

Effect of tunicamycin on glycosylation of a 50 kDa protein and thermotolerance development.

We investigated whether or not a 50 kDa glycoprotein might play an important role in protein synthesis-independent thermotolerance development in CHO cells. When cells were heated for 10 min at 45.5 degrees C, they became thermotolerant to a heat treatment at 45.5 degrees C administered 12 hr later. The thermotolerance ratio at 10(-3) isosurvival was 4.4. The cellular heat shock response leads to enhanced glycosylation of a 50 kDa protein. The glycosylation of proteins including a 50 kDa glycoprotein was inhibited by treatment with various concentrations of tunicamycin (0.2-2 micrograms/ml). The development of thermotolerance was not affected by treatment with tunicamycin after the initial heat treatment, although 2 micrograms/ml tunicamycin inhibited glycosylation by 95%. However, inhibiting protein synthesis with cycloheximide (10 micrograms/ml) after the initial heat treatment partially inhibited the development of thermotolerance. Nevertheless, there was no further reduction of thermotolerance development by treatment with a combination of 2 micrograms/ml tunicamycin and 10 micrograms/ml cycloheximide. These data suggest that development of thermotolerance, especially protein synthesis-independent thermotolerance, is not correlated with increased glycosylation of the 50 kDa protein.     

Protection of Chinese hamster ovary cells from hyperthermic killing by cycloheximide or puromycin

Cycloheximide (CHM) and puromycin (PUR) were used at various concentrations up to maxima of 10 micrograms/ml and 100 micrograms/ml, respectively, which inhibited protein synthesis by 95% without any cytotoxicity. The drugs were added to the cells for a maximum period of 7 h, with various combinations for treatment before, during, and after heating. Maximum protection, i.e., a 10,000-fold increase in survival from 5 X 10(-6) to 5 X 10(-2) after 4 h at 43 degrees C, required both 1-2 h of treatment before heating and 1-2 h of treatment during heating. For treatments at 45.5 degrees C, the protection was less, i.e., a 100-fold increase in survival from 10(-5) to 10(-3). Little or no protection was observed if after treatment, the drug was removed before heating, or if the drug was added at the start of heating and left on for 5 min to 3 h after heating. For both drugs, the amount of protection increased as inhibition of protein synthesis increased. However, the amount of protection from the drugs was the same only at about 95% inhibition; at 60-85% inhibition, CHM afforded more protection than PUR. Therefore, the modes of action of the drugs might be common at high drug concentrations, but different when intermediate concentrations are used.     

Induction of acquired thermotolerance in Tetrahymena thermophila: effects of protein synthesis inhibitors.

When Tetrahymena thermophila cells growing at 30 degrees C are shifted to either 40 or 43 degrees C, the kinetics and extent of induction of heat shock mRNAs in both cases are virtually indistinguishable. However, the cells shifted to 40 degrees C show a typical induction of heat shock protein (HSP) synthesis and survive indefinitely (100% after 24 h), whereas those at 43 degrees C show an abortive synthesis of HSPs and die (less than 0.01% survivors) within 1 h. Cells treated at 30 degrees C with the drugs cycloheximide or emetine, at concentrations which are initially inhibitory to protein synthesis and cell growth but from which cells can eventually recover and resume growth, are after this recovery able to survive a direct shift from 30 to 43 degrees C (ca. 70% survival after 1 h). This induction of thermotolerance by these drugs is as efficient in providing thermoprotection to cells as is a prior sublethal heat treatment which elicits the synthesis of HSPs. However, during the period when drug-treated cells recover their protein synthesis ability and simultaneously acquire the ability to subsequently survive a shift to 43 degrees C, none of the major HSPs are synthesized. The ability to survive a 1-h, 43 degrees C heat treatment, therefore, does not absolutely require the prior synthesis of HSPs. But, as extended survival at 43 degrees Celsius depends absolutely on the ability of cells to continually synthesize HSPs, it appears that a prior heat shock as well as the recovery from protein synthesis inhibition elicits a change in the protein synthetic machinery which allows the translation of HSP mRNAs at what would otherwise be a nonpermissive temperature for protein synthesis.     

Expression, synthesis, and phosphorylation of HSP28 family during development and decay of thermotolerance in CHO plateau-phase cells.

We investigated a correlation between development of thermotolerance and expression, synthesis, or phosphorylation of HSP28 family in CHO plateau phase cells. After heating at 45.5 degrees C for 10 min, thermotolerance developed rapidly and reached its maximum 12-18 hr after heat shock. This acquired thermal resistance was maintained for 72 hr and then gradually decayed. In parallel, the levels of three 28 kDa heat shock proteins, HSP28a along with its two phosphorylated isoforms (HSP28b,c), increased and reached their maximum 24-48 hr after heat shock. The levels of these polypeptides, except HSP28c, remained elevated for 72 hr and then decreased. The level of HSP28 mRNA increased rapidly and reached its maximum 12 hr after heat shock. However, unlike thermotolerance and the levels of HSP28 family proteins, the level of HSP28 mRNA decreased rapidly within 72 hr. These results demonstrate a correlation between the amount of intracellular HSP28 family proteins and development and decay of thermotolerance.     

Effect of histidine on histidinol-induced heat protection in Chinese hamster ovary cells

The possible mechanism for heat protection by the protein synthesis inhibitor histidinol was investigated in CHO cells. Histidinol (HST, 5 mM), an analogue of the essential amino acid L-histidine, added for 2 hr before and during heating at 43 degrees C, protected cells from killing at 43 degrees C. Treatment with HST produced a 600-fold increase in survival from 3 x 10(-4) to 1.8 x 10(-1) after 2.5 hr at 43 degrees C. Although the cells were washed after HST treatment, substantial protective effect was still observed during heating at 43 degrees C. This protective effect gradually decreased with increased incubation time after the drug treatment. However, the protective effect was immediately reduced by treatment with histidine (HIS, 0.25-5 mM) during heating. The amount of reduction was dependent upon HIS concentration: five millimolar HIS completely inhibited HST-induced heat protection. Furthermore, protein synthesis which was inhibited by 95% by 5 mM HST, resumed immediately with 5 mM HIS treatment. In addition, when cells were labeled during or after HST treatment, neither preferential accumulation of heat shock protein families nor phosphorylation of 28 kDa protein was observed. Therefore, these results suggest that the cessation of protein synthesis itself is one of the events involved in protection.     

Thermal tolerance during S phase for cell killing and chromosomal aberrations

Synchronous Chinese hamster ovary cells in early S phase were obtained by selecting mitotic cells, accumulating them at the G1/S border by incubating them in aphidicolin for 12 h, and then incubating them for 2 h after releasing them from the aphidicolin block. To determine if thermotolerance could be induced, the cells were heated at 43 degrees C for 20 min in early S phase, incubated for 160 min, and then heated a second time at 43 degrees C for different durations (30-100 min). For the control, nontolerant population, the cells in early S phase were incubated for 50 min and then heated once at 43 degrees C for different durations (20-60 min). Flow cytometric analysis indicated that the population receiving the second heat dose was in the same part of S phase as the population receiving the single heat dose. A comparison of the heat response for the two populations indicated that heating during early S phase induced thermotolerance for both cell killing and chromosomal aberrations; i.e., for 10% survival, which corresponded to 10% of the cells being cytologically normal, the thermal dose was twofold greater in the thermotolerant cells than in the control, nontolerant cells. Furthermore, this thermotolerance developed during S phase. These observations support the hypothesis that heating during S phase kills cells primarily by inducing chromosomal aberrations.     

Radiosensitivity and thermosensitization of thermotolerant Chinese hamster cells and RIF-1 tumors

CHO cells subline HA-1 were made thermotolerant by a priming heat treatment (43 degrees C, 30 min). Later, 4, 16, or 24 hr, they were either irradiated or heated (43 degrees C, 30 min) and irradiated. Thermotolerance had no effect on the radiation sensitivity of the cells as measured by the D0 value of the clonogenic survival curve. However, the N value of the curve (width of shoulder) showed a significant increase at 24 hr, indicating an increased capacity to accumulate sublethal damage. This indicates that the fractionation schedule 43 degrees C, 30 min + 37 degrees C, 24 hr + 43 degrees C, 30 min + X ray required approximately 100 rad more radiation than 43 degrees C, 30 min + X ray to reduce survival to the same level. The same priming treatment was given to RIF-1 tumors growing in C3H mice. Later, 24 hr, when the tumors were either irradiated or heated (43 degrees C, 30 min) and irradiated, it was found that thermotolerance had no effect on the radiosensitivity of the cells as measured by in vitro assay. However, thermal radiosensitization was not apparent 24 hr after the priming treatment.     

Adaptive cellular response to hyperthermia: 31P-NMR studies

Dynamic intracellular ATP and Pi levels were measured non-invasively for Chinese hamster V79 cells by 31P-NMR under conditions of thermotolerance and heat-shock protein induction. High densities of cells were embedded in agarose strands, placed within a standard NMR sample tube, and perfused with medium maintained either at 37 or 43 degrees C at pH 7.35. Cell survival and heat-shock protein synthesis were assessed either from parallel monolayer cultures or cells dislodged from the agarose strands post-treatment. Thermotolerance (heat resistance) and heat-shock protein synthesis was induced by a 1 h exposure to 43 degrees C followed by incubation for 5 h at 37 degrees C. After the 5 h incubation at 37 degrees C, marked thermal resistance was observed in regard to survival with concomitant synthesis of two major heat-shock proteins at 70 and 103 kDa. Studies were also conducted where tolerance and heat-shock protein synthesis were partially inhibited by depletion of cellular glutathione (GSH) prior to and during heat treatment. Dynamic measurement of intracellular ATP of cells heated with or without GSH depletion revealed no change in steady-state levels immediately after heating or during the 5 h post-heating incubation at 37 degrees C where thermotolerance and heat-shock proteins develop. These data are consistent with other reported data for mammalian cells and indicate that the steady-state ATP levels in mammalian cells remain unchanged during and after the acquisition of the thermotolerant state.     

Heat and sodium arsenite act synergistically on the induction of heat shock gene expression in Xenopus laevis A6 cells

Heat shock protein (HSP) synthesis was studied in the Xenopus epithelial cell line A6 in response to heat and sodium arsenite, either singly or together. Temperatures of 33-35 degrees C consistently brought about the synthesis of HSPs at 87, 73, 70, 54, 31, and 30 kilodaltons (kDa), whereas sodium arsenite at 25-100 microM induced the synthesis of HSPs at 73 and 70 kDa. In cultures exposed to 10 microM sodium arsenite at 30 degrees C, HSP synthesis in the 68- to 73-kDa and 29- to 31-kDa regions was much greater than the HSP synthesis in response to each treatment individually. RNA dot blot analysis using homologous genomic subclones revealed that heat shock induced the accumulation of HSP 70 and 30 mRNAs. The sizes of the HSP 70 and 30 mRNAs determined by Northern hybridization were 2.7 and 1.5 kilobases, respectively. Sodium arsenite (10-100 microM) also induced the accumulation of both HSP 70 and 30 mRNAs. Finally, a mild heat shock (30 degrees C) plus a low concentration of sodium arsenite (10 microM) acted synergistically on HSP 70 and 30 mRNA accumulation in A6 cells. Thus sodium arsenite and heat act synergistically at the level of both HSP synthesis and HSP mRNA accumulation.     

Inhibition of heat shock protein synthesis and thermotolerance by cycloheximide

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to a 43 degrees C, 15-min heat shock to study the relationship between protein synthesis and the development of thermotolerance. The 43 degrees C heat shock triggered the synthesis of three protein families having molecular weights of 110,000, 90,000, and 65,000 (HSP). These proteins were synthesized at 37 and 46 degrees C. This heat shock also induced the development of thermotolerance, which was measured by incubating the cells at 46 degrees C 4 h after the 43 degrees C heat treatment. CHO cells were also exposed to 20 micrograms/ml of cycloheximide for 30 min at 37 degrees C, 15 min at 43 degrees C, and 4 h at 37 degrees C. This treatment inhibited the enhanced synthesis of the Mr 110,000, 90,000, and 65,000 proteins. The cycloheximide was then washed out and the cells were incubated at 46 degrees C. HSP synthesis did not recover during the 46 degrees C incubation. This cycloheximide treatment also partially inhibited the development of thermotolerance. These results suggest that for CHO cells to express thermotolerance when exposed to the supralethal temperature of 46 degrees C protein synthesis is necessary.     

Effect of pH on quercetin-induced suppression of heat shock gene expression and thermotolerance development in HT-29 cells.

When cells were heated for 15 min at 45 degrees C, they became thermotolerant to a second heat exposure at 45 degrees C. Thermotolerance developed rapidly, reached its maximum 6 hr after heat shock, and then gradually decayed. The development of thermotolerance was partially suppressed by treatment with various concentrations of quercetin (0.05-0.2 mM) at pH 7.4 after the initial heat treatment. In contrast, the drug markedly inhibited thermotolerance development at pH 6.5. Furthermore, a combination of low pH and quercetin treatment distinctively altered the expression of HSP70 gene compared with that of HSP28 or HSP90 gene. These results demonstrate a good correlation between the amount of HSP70 gene expression and development of thermotolerance.     

Hyperthermic radiosensitization of thermotolerant Chinese hamster ovary cells

Synchronous G1 cells were given a priming dose of heat (45.5 degrees C for 15 min) and then heated and irradiated 6-120 h later. Compared to heat radiosensitization for cells irradiated 10 min after the priming heat dose (thermal enhancement ratio, TER of 2.6 for a 10-fold reduction in survival), heat radiosensitization 18-24 h after the priming heat dose was less (i.e., TER of 1.6 for radiation at 24 h compared with heat-radiation at 24 h). A thermotolerance ratio (TTR) at 24 h was calculated to be 2.6/1.6 = 1.6. TERs at 100-fold or 1000-fold reduction in survival and ratios of slopes of radiation survival curves also showed that the cells developed a similar amount of thermotolerance for heat radiosensitization at 18-24 h. Furthermore, since the TER for heat radiosensitization increased with heat killing either from the priming heat dose or the second heat dose in a similar manner for single or fractionated doses, the TER for nonthermotolerant and thermotolerant cells was the same when related to the heat damage (i.e., amount of killing from heat alone). When the radiation response of cells heated and irradiated 6-120 h after the priming heat dose was compared with the response of cells receiving radiation only, changes in TER as a function of time after the initial priming heat dose were shown to involve: recovery of heat damage interacting with the subsequent radiation dose, thermotolerance for heat radiosensitization, and redistribution of cells surviving the first heat dose into radioresistant phases of the cell cycle. In fact, redistribution resulted in a minimal TER at 72 h for heat-radiation compared with radiation alone, instead of at 24 h where maximal thermotolerance for heat killing was observed [P. K. Holahan and W. C. Dewey, Radiat. Res. 106, 111 (1986)]. These observations are discussed relative to clinical considerations and similar results reported from in vivo experiments.     

Acquisition of thermotolerance induced by heat and arsenite in HeLa S3 cells: Multiple pathways to induce tolerance?

Recent data indicate that cells may acquire thermotolerance via more than one route. In this study, we observed differences in thermotolerance development in HeLa S3 cells induced by prior heating (15 minutes at 44 degrees C) or pretreatment with sodium-arsenite (1 hour at 37 degrees C, 100 microM). Inhibition of overall protein and heat shock protein (HSP) synthesis (greater than 95%) by cycloheximide (25 micrograms/ml) during tolerance development nearly completely abolished thermotolerance induced by arsenite, while significant levels of heat-induced thermotolerance were still apparent. The same dependence of protein synthesis was found for resistance against sodium-arsenite toxicity. Toxic heat, but not toxic arsenite treatments caused heat damage in the cell nucleus, measured as an increase in the protein mass of nuclei isolated from treated cells (intranuclear protein aggregation). Recovery from this intranuclear protein aggregation was observed during post-heat incubations of the cells at 37 degrees C. The rate of recovery was faster in heat-induced tolerant cells than in nontolerant cells. Arsenite-induced tolerant cells did not show an enhanced rate of recovery from the heat-induced intranuclear protein aggregation. In parallel, hyperthermic inhibition of RNA synthesis was the same in tolerant and nontolerant cells, whereas post-heat recovery was enhanced in heat-induced, but not arsenite-induced thermotolerant cells. The more rapid recovery from heat damage in the nucleus (protein aggregation and RNA synthesis) in cells made tolerant by a prior heat treatment seemed related to the ability of heat (but not arsenite) to induce HSP translocations to the nucleus.