Role of HU proteins in forming and constraining supercoils of chromosomal DNA inEscherichia coli

Induction of supercoiling in plasmid DNA by HU heterotypic and homotypic dimers, a mutant HU-2 (HupAN12), HBs and HB1 proteins with different DNA-binding affinities was investigated in vitro. The abilities of these proteins to induce supercoiling in DNA correlated with their affinities for DNA. Stoichiometrical analysis of HU heterodimers bound to DNA in the complex restraining the negative torsional tension of DNA showed that 12–13 dimers account for a single superhelical turn. The number of supercoils in the plasmid in vivo decreased on inhibition of DNA gyrase with coumermycin, reaching a steady-state level that indicated the existence of a compartment of restrained supercoils. The size of the restrained compartment was reduced in the absence of HU, indicating the participation of HU in constituting this fraction, and was larger on overproduction of HU-2 in the cells. An increased level of DNA gyrase, expressed from a plasmid carrying bothgyr genes, in the cells did not compensate for the deficit of the restrained supercoils caused by HU deficiency, indicating seeming distinct and unrelated action of HU and DNA gyrase in introducing and constraining supercoiling of intracellular DNA.     

Role of HU proteins in forming and constraining supercoils of chromosomal DNA inEscherichia coli

Induction of supercoiling in plasmid DNA by HU heterotypic and homotypic dimers, a mutant HU-2 (HupAN12), HBs and HB1 proteins with different DNA-binding affinities was investigated in vitro. The abilities of these proteins to induce supercoiling in DNA correlated with their affinities for DNA. Stoichiometrical analysis of HU heterodimers bound to DNA in the complex restraining the negative torsional tension of DNA showed that 12–13 dimers account for a single superhelical turn. The number of supercoils in the plasmid in vivo decreased on inhibition of DNA gyrase with coumermycin, reaching a steady-state level that indicated the existence of a compartment of restrained supercoils. The size of the restrained compartment was reduced in the absence of HU, indicating the participation of HU in constituting this fraction, and was larger on overproduction of HU-2 in the cells. An increased level of DNA gyrase, expressed from a plasmid carrying bothgyr genes, in the cells did not compensate for the deficit of the restrained supercoils caused by HU deficiency, indicating seeming distinct and unrelated action of HU and DNA gyrase in introducing and constraining supercoiling of intracellular DNA.     

Changes in the linking number of supercoiled DNA accompany growth transitions in Escherichia coli.

The supercoiling levels of plasmid DNA were determined from Escherichia coli which was grown in ways that are known to alter global patterns of gene expression and metabolism. Changes in DNA supercoiling were shown to occur during several types of these nutrient upshifts and downshifts. The most dramatic change in supercoiling was seen in starved cells, in which two populations of differentially relaxed plasmids were shown to coexist. Thus, some changes in the external nutritional environment that cause the cells to reorganize their global metabolism also cause accompanying changes in DNA supercoiling. Results of experiments with dinitrophenol suggested that the observed relaxations were probably not due to reduced pools of ATP. When rifampin was used to release supercoils restrained by RNA polymerase, the cellular topoisomerases responded by removing these new, unrestrained supercoils. We interpret these results as implying that the cellular topological machinery maintains a constant superhelical energy in the DNA except during certain growth transitions, when changes in metabolism and gene expression are accompanied by changes in DNA supercoiling.     

Bacterial DNA supercoiling and [ATP]/[ADP]. Changes associated with a transition to anaerobic growth.

Shifting Escherichia coli from aerobic to anaerobic growth caused changes in the ratio of [ATP]/[ADP] and in negative supercoiling of chromosomal and plasmid DNA. Shortly after lowering oxygen tension, both [ATP]/[ADP] and supercoiling transiently decreased. Under conditions of exponential anaerobic growth, both were higher than under aerobic conditions. These correlations may reflect an effect of [ATP]/[ADP] on DNA gyrase, since in vitro [ATP]/[ADP] influences the level of plasmid supercoiling attained when gyrase is either introducing or removing supercoils. When the supercoiling activity of gyrase was perturbed by a mutation in gyrB, a shift to anaerobic conditions resulted in plasmid supercoil relaxation similar to that seen with wild-type. However, the low level of supercoiling in the mutant persisted during a time when supercoiling in wild-type recovered and then exceeded aerobic levels. Thus, changes in oxygen tension can alter DNA supercoiling through an effect on gyrase, and correlations exist between changes in supercoiling and changes in the intracellular ratio of [ATP]/[ADP].     

Reprint of “The mechanism of negative DNA supercoiling: A cascade of DNA-induced conformational changes prepares gyrase for strand passage”

DNA topoisomerases inter-convert different DNA topoisomers in the cell. They catalyze the introduction or relaxation of DNA supercoils, as well as catenation and decatenation. Members of the type I topoisomerase family cleave a single strand of their double-stranded DNA substrate, whereas enzymes of the type II family cleave both DNA strands. Bacterial DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase, catalyzes the introduction of negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. Gyrase is not present in humans, and constitutes an attractive drug target for the treatment of bacterial and parasite infections. DNA supercoiling by gyrase is believed to occur by a strand passage mechanism, in which one segment of the double-stranded DNA substrate is passed through a (transient) break in a second segment. This mechanism requires the coordinated opening and closing of three protein interfaces, so-called gates, to ensure the directionality of strand passage toward negative supercoiling.Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments are ideally suited to investigate conformational changes during the catalytic cycle of DNA topoisomerases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the cascade of DNA- and nucleotide-induced conformational changes in gyrase that lead to strand passage and negative supercoiling of DNA. We discuss how these conformational changes couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling in gyrase, and how the common mechanistic principle of coordinated gate opening and closing is modulated to allow for the catalysis of different reactions by different type II topoisomerases.     

The mechanism of negative DNA supercoiling: A cascade of DNA-induced conformational changes prepares gyrase for strand passage

DNA topoisomerases inter-convert different DNA topoisomers in the cell. They catalyze the introduction or relaxation of DNA supercoils, as well as catenation and decatenation. Members of the type I topoisomerase family cleave a single strand of their double-stranded DNA substrate, whereas enzymes of the type II family cleave both DNA strands. Bacterial DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase, catalyzes the introduction of negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. Gyrase is not present in humans, and constitutes an attractive drug target for the treatment of bacterial and parasite infections. DNA supercoiling by gyrase is believed to occur by a strand passage mechanism, in which one segment of the double-stranded DNA substrate is passed through a (transient) break in a second segment. This mechanism requires the coordinated opening and closing of three protein interfaces, so-called gates, to ensure the directionality of strand passage toward negative supercoiling.Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments are ideally suited to investigate conformational changes during the catalytic cycle of DNA topoisomerases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the cascade of DNA- and nucleotide-induced conformational changes in gyrase that lead to strand passage and negative supercoiling of DNA. We discuss how these conformational changes couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling in gyrase, and how the common mechanistic principle of coordinated gate opening and closing is modulated to allow for the catalysis of different reactions by different type II topoisomerases.     

Torsional tension in the DNA double helix measured with trimethylpsoralen in living E. coli cells: analogous measurements in insect and human cells

The rate of covalent photobinding of trimethylpsoralen to DNA is greater when the DNA is wound with negative superhelical tension than when it is relaxed. In vitro the rate of photobinding is directly proportional to the negative superhelical density of the DNA. Thus measurement of the rate of photobinding provides an assay for probing in vivo unrestrained tension in the winding of the DNA double helix. This approach has been applied to measure torsional tension in DNA as it is packaged in living E. coli. Drosophila and HeLa cells. A method is described for measuring the rate of photobinding to intracellular DNA and rRNA, and for using the latter measurement as an internal control of the rate of me3-psoralen photobinding in vivo. This permits more accurate and reproducible measurement of changes in the DNA-psoralen photobinding reaction. The me3-psoralen probe interacts with intracellular bacterial DNA as expected for a purified DNA duplex wound with superhelical density sigma = -0.05 +/- 0.01. This superhelical tension is relaxed in cells when multiple single-strand breaks are introduced into the chromosomal DNA by gamma-irradiation. Similar relaxation occurs when cells are treated with the DNA gyrase inhibitor coumermycin. The results suggest that the DNA double helix is wound with torsional tension in vivo and that DNA supercoils which are equilibrated with this tension are not completely restrained in nucleosome-like structures. Torsional tension in the DNA of eucaryotic cells is not detectable in analogous measurements of the packaged DNA of HeLa and Drosophila cells. The simplest interpretation of this finding is that, within the limits of detection, all superhelical turns in the DNA are restrained in nucleosomes or nucleosome-like structures in these eucaryotic cells.     

Mechanisms for defining supercoiling set point of DNA gyrase orthologs: I. A nonconserved acidic C-terminal tail modulates Escherichia coli gyrase activity

DNA topoisomerases manage chromosome supercoiling and organization in all cells. Gyrase, a prokaryotic type IIA topoisomerase, consumes ATP to introduce negative supercoils through a strand passage mechanism. All type IIA topoisomerases employ a similar set of catalytic domains for function; however, the activity and specificity of gyrase are augmented by a specialized DNA binding and wrapping element, termed the C-terminal domain (CTD), which is appended to its GyrA subunit. We have discovered that a nonconserved, acidic tail at the extreme C terminus of the Escherichia coli GyrA CTD has a dramatic and unexpected impact on gyrase function. Removal of the CTD tail enables GyrA to introduce writhe into DNA in the absence of GyrB, an activity exhibited by other GyrA orthologs, but not by wild-type E. coli GyrA. Strikingly, a "tail-less" gyrase holoenzyme is markedly impaired for DNA supercoiling capacity, but displays normal ATPase function. Our findings reveal that the E. coli GyrA tail regulates DNA wrapping by the CTD to increase the coupling efficiency between ATP turnover and supercoiling, demonstrating that CTD functions can be fine-tuned to control gyrase activity in a highly sophisticated manner.     

DNA gyrase can supercoil DNA circles as small as 174 base pairs.

DNA gyrase introduces negative supercoils into closed-circular DNA using the free energy of ATP hydrolysis. Consideration of steric and thermodynamic aspects of the supercoiling reaction indicates that there should be a lower limit to the size of DNA circle which can be supercoiled by gyrase. We have investigated the supercoiling reaction of circles from 116-427 base pairs (bp) in size and have determined that gyrase can supercoil certain relaxed isomers of circles as small as 174 bp, dependent on the final superhelix density of the supercoiled product. Furthermore, this limiting superhelical density (-0.11) is the same as that determined for the supercoiling of plasmid pBR322. We also find that although circles in the range 116-152 bp cannot be supercoiled, they can nevertheless be relaxed by gyrase when positively supercoiled. These data suggest that the conformational changes associated with the supercoiling reaction can be carried out by gyrase in a circle as small as 116 bp. We discuss these results with respect to the thermodynamics of DNA supercoiling and steric aspects of the gyrase mechanism.     

Dissection of the nucleotide cycle of B. subtilis DNA gyrase and its modulation by DNA

DNA topoisomerases catalyze the inter-conversion of different topological forms of DNA. While all type II DNA topoisomerases relax supercoiled DNA, DNA gyrase is the only enyzme that introduces negative supercoils into DNA at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. We present here a biophysical characterization of the nucleotide cycle of DNA gyrase from Bacillus subtilis, both in the absence and presence of DNA. B. subtilis DNA gyrase is highly homologous to its well-studied Escherichia coli counterpart, but exhibits unique mechanistic features. The active heterotetramer of B. subtilis DNA gyrase is formed by mixing the GyrA and GyrB subunits. GyrB undergoes nucleotide-induced dimerization and is an ATP-operated clamp. The intrinsic ATPase activity of gyrase is stimulated tenfold in the presence of plasmid DNA. However, in contrast to the E. coli homolog, the rate-limiting step in the nucleotide cycle of B. subtilis GyrB is ATP hydrolysis, not product dissociation or an associated conformational change. Furthermore, there is no cooperativity between the two DNA and ATP binding sites in B. subtilis DNA gyrase. Nevertheless, the enzyme is as efficient in negative supercoiling as the E. coli DNA gyrase. Our results provide evidence that the evolutionary goal of efficient DNA supercoiling can be realized by similar architecture, but differences in the underlying mechanism. The basic mechanistic features are conserved among DNA gyrases, but the kinetics of individual steps can vary significantly even between closely related enzymes. This suggests that each topoisomerase represents a different solution to the complex reaction sequence in DNA supercoiling.     

Adenosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (ATPgammaS) promotes positive supercoiling of DNA by T. maritima reverse gyrase

Reverse gyrases are topoisomerases that catalyze ATP-dependent positive supercoiling of circular covalently closed DNA. They consist of an N-terminal helicase-like domain, fused to a C-terminal topoisomerase I-like domain. Most of our knowledge on reverse gyrase-mediated positive DNA supercoiling is based on studies of archaeal enzymes. To identify general and individual properties of reverse gyrases, we set out to characterize the reverse gyrase from a hyperthermophilic eubacterium. Thermotoga maritima reverse gyrase relaxes negatively supercoiled DNA in the presence of ADP or the non-hydrolyzable ATP-analog ADPNP. Nucleotide binding is necessary, but not sufficient for the relaxation reaction. In the presence of ATP, positive supercoils are introduced at temperatures above 50 degrees C. However, ATP hydrolysis is stimulated by DNA already at 37 degrees C, suggesting that reverse gyrase is not frozen at this temperature, but capable of undergoing inter-domain communication. Positive supercoiling by reverse gyrase is strictly coupled to ATP hydrolysis. At the physiological temperature of 75 degrees C, reverse gyrase binds and hydrolyzes ATPgammaS. Surprisingly, ATPgammaS hydrolysis is stimulated by DNA, and efficiently promotes positive DNA supercoiling, demonstrating that inter-domain communication during positive supercoiling is fully functional with both ATP and ATPgammaS. These findings support a model for communication between helicase-like and topoisomerase domains in reverse gyrase, in which an ATP and DNA-induced closure of the cleft in the helicase-like domain initiates a cycle of conformational changes that leads to positive DNA supercoiling.     

The "GyrA-box" is required for the ability of DNA gyrase to wrap DNA and catalyze the supercoiling reaction

DNA gyrase is the only topoisomerase that can introduce negative supercoils into DNA. It is thought that the binding of conventional type II topoisomerases, including topoisomerase IV, to DNA takes place at the catalytic domain across the DNA gate, whereas DNA gyrase binds to DNA not only at the amino-terminal catalytic domain but also at the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the GyrA subunit. The binding of the GyrA CTD to DNA allows gyrase to wrap DNA around itself and catalyze the supercoiling reaction. Recent structural studies, however, have revealed striking similarities between the GyrA CTD and the ParC CTD, as well as the ability of the ParC CTD to bind and bend DNA. Thus, the molecular basis of gyrase-mediated wrapping of DNA needs to be reexamined. Here, we have conducted a mutational analysis to determine the role of the "GyrA-box," a 7-amino acid-long motif unique to the GyrA CTD, in determining the DNA binding mode of gyrase. Either a deletion of the entire GyrA-box or substitution of the GyrA-box with 7 Ala residues abolishes the ability of gyrase to wrap DNA around itself and catalyze the supercoiling reaction. However, these mutations do not affect the relaxation and decatenation activities of gyrase. Thus, the presence of a GyrA-box allows gyrase to wrap DNA and catalyze the supercoiling reaction. The consequence of the loss of the GyrA-box during evolution of bacterial type II topoisomerases is discussed.     

The twisted 'life' of DNA in the cell: bacterial topoisomerases

DNA topoisomerases are essential to the cell for the regulation of DNA supercoiling levels and for chromosome decatenation. The proposed mechanisms for these reactions are essentially the same, except that a change in supercoiling is due to an intramolecular event, while decatenation requires an intermolecular event. The characterized bacterial topoisomerases appear capable of both types of reaction in vitro. Four DNA topoisomerases have been identified in Escherichia coli. Topoisomerase I, gyrase, and topoisomerase IV normally appear to have distinct essential functions within the cell, Gyrase and topoisomerase I are responsible for the regulation of DNA supercoiling. Both gyrase and topoisomerase IV are necessary for chromosomal decatenation. Multiple topoisomerases with distinct functions may give the cell more precise control over DNA topology by allowing tighter regulation of the principal enzymatic activities of these different proteins.     

Torsional tension in intracellular bacteriophage T4 DNA. Evidence that a linear DNA duplex can be supercoiled in vivo

Torsional tension in intracellular bacteriophage T4 DNA and host cell DNA was measured in infected Escherichia coli cells using the trimethylpsoralen photobinding assay. Early in infection superhelical tension in the host E. coli DNA was gradually reduced until at 8 min post-infection there was no detectable tension. Negative torsional tension in the T4 DNA appeared transiently, reaching a maximum 4 to 6 min post-infection (at 32 °C) and declined to undetectable levels by 10 min. The maximum level of tension averaged over all infecting T4 DNA molecules was equivalent to superhelical density of about σ = ?0.03.Sedimentation studies of the psoralen-associated T4 DNA isolated from infected cells at 5 min post-infection indicated that this DNA was primarily in an intact linear form. This is the first evidence indicating that a linear DNA molecule can acquire torsional tension in vivo: the finding suggests that intracellular T4 DNA can be topologically restrained probably by interaction with other structures in the cell. Effects of inhibitors of DNA gyrase and effects of mutations in T4 gene 39 indicated that the observed torsional tension was introduced by E. coli DNA gyrase, not by the T4 topoisomerase. Studies of the number of nicks required to relax the tension suggest that the entire T4 genome is organized into one topological domain of supercoiling.The possible role of the negative superhelical tension in the initiation of T4 DNA replication was examined. Initiation of DNA replication occurred shortly after the accumulation of tension in T4 DNA. However, replication occurred at near-normal levels under conditions where acquisition of tension was blocked in T4 DNA. Results suggest that although a topoisomerase activity is required for the initiation of DNA replication, the observed torsional tension is not a prerequisite.     

A superhelical spiral in the Escherichia coli DNA gyrase A C-terminal domain imparts unidirectional supercoiling bias

DNA gyrase is unique among type II topoisomerases in that its DNA supercoiling activity is unidirectional. The C-terminal domain of the gyrase A subunit (GyrA-CTD) is required for this supercoiling bias. We report here the x-ray structure of the Escherichia coli GyrA-CTD (Protein Data Bank code 1ZI0). The E. coli GyrA-CTD adopts a circular-shaped beta-pinwheel fold first seen in the Borrelia burgdorferi GyrA-CTD. However, whereas the B. burgdorferi GyrA-CTD is flat, the E. coli GyrA-CTD is spiral. DNA relaxation assays reveal that the E. coli GyrA-CTD wraps DNA inducing substantial (+) superhelicity, while the B. burgdorferi GyrA-CTD introduces a more modest (+) superhelicity. The observation of a superhelical spiral in the present structure and that of the Bacillus stearothermophilus ParC-CTD structure suggests unexpected similarities in substrate selectivity between gyrase and Topo IV enzymes. We propose a model wherein the right-handed ((+) solenoidal) wrapping of DNA around the E. coli GyrA-CTD enforces unidirectional (-) DNA supercoiling.