植物TIR-NB-LRR类型抗病基因各结构域的研究进展

植物抗病反应是一个多基因调控的复杂过程,在这个过程中R基因发挥了非常重要的作用。根据其氨基酸基序组成以及跨膜结构域的不同,R基因可以分为多种类型,其中NBS-LRR类型是植物基因组中最大的基因家族之一。TIR-NB-LRR类型的抗病基因又是NB-LRR类型中的一大类,也是目前抗病基因研究的热点。该文总结了TIR-NB-LRR类型抗病基因各个结构域的功能和相关的研究进展。相关研究表明,TIR结构域主要通过自身或异源的二聚体化介导抗性信号的转导,但也有部分研究表明,该结构域可能参与病原菌的特异性识别。NBS结构域常被认为具有"分子开关"的功能,它可以通过结合ADP或ATP来调节植物抗病蛋白的构象变化,从而调节下游抗病信号的传导。LRR结构域在植物与病原菌互作的过程中可以通过与病原菌的无毒蛋白直接或间接互作来特异识别病原菌。也有研究发现,LRR结构域具有调节信号传导的功能。这些信息将为研究植物抗病机理提供理论依据,也为将来通过基因编辑技术对作物进行定向抗病育种提供思路。     

The Problems of Specific Phytoimmunity

Recent studies established that the specificity of phytoimmunity is shaped at the initial stages of genic interactions between a pathogen and its plant host. While elicitors, the products of pathogen avirulence genes (avr-genes), have been already investigated in great detail, there are few studies on the products of plant resistance genes (R-genes) recognizing these elicitors. This review deals with examples of nonspecific and specific elicitors of some R-genes as well as the systems that transduce the elicited signals to the plant genome and evoke immune responses in the plant cells. Several types of immunosuppressors characteristic of pathogens are considered. The molecular-genetic studies of the relations between the pathogens and their plant hosts supplement the already existing arsenal for plant protection with new technologies, such as the genetically engineered plant resistance and the resistance induced by biogenic elicitors.     

Fungal Pathogens: The Battle for Plant Infection

The attempted infection of a plant by a pathogen, such as a fungus or an Oomycete, may be regarded as a battle whose major weapons are proteins and smaller chemical compounds produced by both organisms. Indeed, plants produce an astonishing plethora of defense compounds that are still being discovered at a rapid pace. This pattern arose from a multi-million year, ping-pong?type co-evolution, in which plant and pathogen successively added new chemical weapons in this perpetual battle. As each defensive innovation was established in the host, new ways to circumvent it evolved in the pathogen. This complex co-evolution process probably explains not only the exquisite specificity observed between many pathogens and their hosts, but also the ineffectiveness or redundancy of some defensive genes which often encode enzymes with overlapping activities. Plants evolved a complex, multi-level series of structural and chemical barriers that are both constitutive or preformed and inducible. These defenses may involve strengthening of the cell wall, hypersensitive response (HR), oxidative burst, phytoalexins and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. The pathogen must successfully overcome these obstacles before it succeeds in causing disease. In some cases, it needs to modulate or modify plant cell metabolism to its own benefit and/or to abolish defense reactions. Central to the activation of plant responses is timely perception of the pathogen by the plant. A crucial role is played by elicitors which, depending on their mode of action, are broadly classified into nonspecific elicitors and highly specific elicitors or virulence effector/avirulence factors. A protein battle for penetration is then initiated, marking the pathogen attempted transition from extracellular to invasive growth before parasitism and disease can be established. Three major types of defense responses may be observed in plants: non-host resistance, host resistance, and host pathogenesis. Plant innate immunity may comprise a continuum from non-host resistance involving the detection of general elicitors to host-specific resistance involving detection of specific elicitors by R proteins. It was generally assumed that non-host resistance was based on passive mechanisms and that nonspecific rejection usually arose as a consequence of the non-host pathogen failure to breach the first lines of plant defense. However, recent evidence has blurred the clear-cut distinction among non-host resistance, host-specific resistance and disease. The same obstacles are also serious challenges for host pathogens, reducing their success rate significantly in causing disease. Indeed, even susceptible plants mount a (insufficient) defense response upon recognition of pathogen elicited molecular signals. Recent evidence suggests the occurrence of significant overlaps between the protein components and signalling pathways of these types of resistance, suggesting the existence of both shared and unique features for the three branches of plant innate immunity.     

Molecular communication between host plant and the fungal tomato pathogenCladosporium fulvum

Host genotype specificity in interactions between biotrophic fungal pathogens and plants in most cases complies with the gene-for-gene model. Success or failure of infection is determined by absence or presence of complementary genes, avirulence and resistance genes, in the pathogen and the host plant, respectively. Resistance, expressed by the induction of a hypersensitive response followed by other defence responses in the host, is envisaged to be based on recognition of the pathogen, mediated through direct interaction between products of avirulence genes of the pathogen (the so-called race-specific elicitors) and receptors in the host plant, the putative products of resistance genes. The interaction between the biothrophic fungusCladosporium fulvum and its only host tomato is a model system to study fungus-plant gene-for-gene relationships. Here we report on isolation, characterization and biological function of putative pathogenicity factors ECP1 and ECP2 and the race-specific elicitors AVR4 and AVR9 ofC. fulvum and cloning and regulation of their encoding genes. Disruption ofecp1 andecp2 genes has no clear effect on pathogenicity ofC. fulvum. Disruption of theavr9 gene, which codes for the race-specific 28 amino acid AVR9 elicitor, in wild type avirulent races, leads to virulence on tomato genotypes carrying the complementary resistance geneCf9. The avirulence geneavr4 encodes a 105 amino acid race-specific elicitor. A single basepair change in the avirulence geneavr4 leads to virulence on tomato genotypes carrying theCf4 resistance gene.     

microRNA-mediated <Emphasis Type="Italic">R</Emphasis> gene regulation: molecular scabbards for double-edged swords

Plant resistance (R) proteins are immune receptors that recognize pathogen effectors and trigger rapid defense responses, namely effector-triggered immunity. R protein-mediated pathogen resistance is usually race specific. During plant-pathogen coevolution, plant genomes accumulated large numbers of R genes. Even though plant R genes provide important natural resources for breeding disease-resistant crops, their presence in the plant genome comes at a cost. Misregulation of R genes leads to developmental defects, such as stunted growth and reduced fertility. In the past decade, many microRNAs (miRNAs) have been identified to target various R genes in plant genomes. miRNAs reduce R gene levels under normal conditions and allow induction of R gene expression under various stresses. For these reasons, we consider R genes to be double-edged “swords” and miRNAs as molecular “scabbards”. In the present review, we summarize the contributions and potential problems of these “swords” and discuss the features and production of the “scabbards”, as well as the mechanisms used to pull the “sword” from the “scabbard” when needed.     

Molecular mechanisms involved in bacterial speck disease resistance of tomato

An important recent advance in the field of plant-microbe interactions has been the cloning of genes that confer resistance to specific viruses, bacteria, fungi or nematodes. Disease resistance (R) genes encode proteins with predicted structural motifs consistent with them having roles in signal recognition and transduction. The future challenge is to understand how R gene products specifically perceive defence-eliciting signals from the pathogen and transduce those signals to pathways that lead to the activation of plant defence responses. In tomatoes, the Pto kinase (product of the Pto R gene) confers resistance to strains of the bacterial speck pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, that carry the corresponding avirulence gene avrPto. Resistance to bacterial speck disease is initiated by a mechanism involving the physical interaction of the Pto kinase and the AvrPto protein. This recognition event initiates signalling events that lead to defence responses including an oxidative burst, the hypersensitive response and expression of pathogenesis-related genes. Pto-interacting (Pti) proteins have been identified that appear to act downstream of the Pto kinase and our current studies are directed at elucidating the roles of these components.     

Elicitins与植物的抗病性

Elicitins是一类分子量约为10kD的小分子蛋白激发子,由Phytophthora和Pythium两个属的植物病原卵菌胞外分泌产生,在烟草上引起过敏性反应(hypersensitive response,HR)和系统获得抗病性(systemic acquired resistance,SAR)。中从Elicitins结构与功能、生物学意义、基因表达调控,Elicitins在植物上诱发的信号传导和转Ebcitins基因的抗病基因工程5个方面概述了Elicitins的研究进展。     

植物抗病反应的信号传导网络

植物由抗病基因介导的防卫过程存在一系列生理生化和分子生物学反应,这些反应从病原菌侵染点开始的超敏反应(HR)并延伸到远处组织的系统抗性或获得性抗性(SAR),受制于一种信号传导网络的调控。这个信号系统由抗病蛋白和病原菌非毒性蛋白在一种配体-受体的互作模式下激发,并由信号分子H2O2,NO和系统信号分子SA,JA和乙烯和通过关键调控基因传递和放大,最终诱导一系列防卫反应基因的表达和代谢的变化而产生抗性。植物防卫信号的产生有类似于动物免疫系统因子的介导,并可由非寄主病原菌或诱导子诱发。这些信号途径所产生的广谱抗性为植物抗病基因工程的应用奠定了基础。     

Gene shuffling-generated and natural variants of the tomato resistance gene Cf-9 exhibit different auto-necrosis-inducing activities in Nicotiana species

Tomato Cf genes encode membrane-bound proteins with extracellular leucine-rich repeats, and confer resistance to the fungal tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum, and a hypersensitive response (HR) to C. fulvum-derived race-specific elicitors. Several Cf genes, including Cf-4 and Cf-9, are members of the highly homologous Hcr9 (homologues of C. fulvumresistance gene Cf-9) gene family. Hcr9s evolve mainly by sequence exchange between paralogues, by which novel Cf genes may be generated. To mimic this aspect of natural evolution, we generated chimeras between multiple Hcr9s in vitro by gene shuffling. The shufflants were tested for novel specificities by transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. Many shufflants induced an HR in the absence of fungal elicitors and were designated auto-activators. We also identified two natural Hcr9 auto-activators in the wild tomato species Lycopersicon peruvianum, which induced an HR upon expression in N. benthamiana. The Hcr9 auto-activators exhibit different auto-necrosis-inducing specificities in five selected species of the Nicotiana genus, and they were shown to function in the same signalling pathway as Cf-9. Auto-activating alleles of nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat genes and the protein kinase Pto were previously described. The auto-activators described here, belonging to the Cf-like structural class of resistance genes, shed light on this important phenotype and may be used as tools to unravel the mechanisms by which this class of resistance proteins function.     

寄主植物与病原菌免疫反应的分子遗传基础

近年来,大量的植物抗病基因和病原菌无毒基因被克隆,抗病基因和无毒基因的结构、功能及其互作关系的研究也取得重大进展。在植物中,由病原菌模式分子(pathogen-associated molecular patterns, PAMPs)引发的免疫反应(PAMP-triggered immunity, PTI)和由效应因子引发的免疫反应(effector-triggered immunity, ETI)是植物在长期进化过程中形成的两类抵抗病原物的机制。PTI反应主要通过细胞表面受体(patternrecognition receptors, PRRs)识别并结合PAMPs从而激活下游免疫反应,而在ETI反应中,则通过植物R基因(resistance gene,R)与病原菌无毒基因(avirulence gene, Avr)产物间的直接或间接相互作用来完成免疫反应。本文对植物PTI反应和ETI反应分别进行了概述,重点探讨了植物R基因与病原菌Avr基因之间的互作遗传机理,并对目前植物抗性分子遗传机制研究和抗病育种中的问题进行了探讨和展望。     

Glucosylation of the phytoalexin N‐feruloyl tyramine modulates the levels of pathogen‐responsive metabolites in Nicotiana benthamiana

Enzyme promiscuity, a common property of many uridine diphosphate sugar‐dependent glycosyltransferases (UGTs) that convert small molecules, significantly hinders the identification of natural substrates and therefore the characterization of the physiological role of enzymes. In this paper we present a simple but effective strategy to identify endogenous substrates of plant UGTs using LC‐MS‐guided targeted glycoside analysis of transgenic plants. We successfully identified natural substrates of two promiscuous Nicotiana benthamiana UGTs (NbUGT73A24 and NbUGT73A25), orthologues of pathogen‐induced tobacco UGT (TOGT) from Nicotiana tabacum, which is involved in the hypersensitive reaction. While in N. tabacum, TOGT glucosylated scopoletin after treatment with salicylate, fungal elicitors and the tobacco mosaic virus, NbUGT73A24 and NbUGT73A25 produced glucosides of phytoalexin N‐feruloyl tyramine, which may strengthen cell walls to prevent the intrusion of pathogens, and flavonols after agroinfiltration of the corresponding genes in N. benthamiana. Enzymatic glucosylation of fractions of a physiological aglycone library confirmed the biological substrates of UGTs. In addition, overexpression of both genes in N. benthamiana produced clear lesions on the leaves and led to a significantly reduced content of pathogen‐induced plant metabolites such as phenylalanine and tryptophan. Our results revealed some additional biological functions of TOGT enzymes and indicated a multifunctional role of UGTs in plant resistance.     

Defence gene expression in soybean is linked to the status of the cell death program

Soybean cell cultures (cv. Williams 82) respond to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria expressing the avirulence gene AvrA with a hypersensitive reaction, a programmed cell death (PCD) of plant cells to pathogen attack. This PCD is under control of salicylic acid (SA) via an unknown mechanism. In the presence of low concentrations of SA, the cells undergo a very rapid cell death, which needs only half of the time required for the normal hypersensitive reaction (HR). Northern blot studies for defence-related genes show that the expression of many of these genes is tightly linked to the status of the cell death program rather than to pathogen-derived elicitors. Thus the expression is much faster in the SA-accelerated PCD than in the normal hypersensitive reaction. In contrast, other pathogen-responsive genes are induced independently of the speed of PCD, indicating a divergent signalling mechanism. The production of reactive oxygen species during the oxidative burst of bacteria-inoculated soybean cells is slightly enhanced in the presence of SA but occurs at the same time as in untreated cells, suggesting that SA exhibits the control of the PCD downstream of the oxidative burst. Consistent with these findings a HR-specific marker gene is neither directly induced by H₂O₂ or SA. However, this gene shows a high expression in the regular HR and is induced much faster in the SA-accelerated PCD.     

Hessian fly Avirulence gene loss‐of‐function defeats plant resistance without compromising the larva's ability to induce a gall tissue

Plant pathogen effectors encoded by Avirulence (Avr) genes benefit the pathogen by promoting colonization and benefit plants that have a matching resistance (R) gene by constituting a signal that triggers resistance. The Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), resembles a plant pathogen in showing R/Avr interactions. Because of these interactions, a wheat plant with the H13 resistance gene can be resistant or susceptible depending on the genotype of the larva that attacks the plant, being resistant if attack comes from a larva with a functional vH13 gene, but susceptible if attack comes from a larva with a non‐functional vH13 gene. In this study we asked: does this susceptible interaction involving plants with H13 look like susceptible interactions with plants lacking H13? Possibly, the H13 plant attacked by a larva with a non‐functional vH13 is induced to partial rather than complete resistance. Or the larva, lacking its vH13‐encoded effector, is compromised in its ability to induce susceptibility, which includes forcing the plant to create a gall nutritive tissue. Responses of epidermal cells to larval attack were explored using imaging techniques (light microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy). Whole‐organism responses were investigated by measuring the growth of plants and larvae. No evidence was found for partial resistance responses by H13 plants or for a compromise in the ability of vH13 loss‐of‐function larvae to induce susceptibility. It appears that disrupting vH13 function is sufficient for overcoming the induced resistance mediated by the H13 gene.     

Fungal Avirulence Genes: Structure and Possible Functions

Avirulence (Avr) genes exist in many fungi that share a gene-for-gene relationship with their host plant. They represent unique genetic determinants that prevent fungi from causing disease on plants that possess matching resistance (R) genes. Interaction between elicitors (primary or secondary products ofAvrgenes) and host receptors in resistant plants causes induction of various defense responses often involving a hypersensitive response.Avrgenes have been successfully isolated by reverse genetics and positional cloning. Five cultivar-specificAvrgenes (Avr4,Avr9, andEcp2 fromCladosporium fulvum; nip1fromRhynchosporium secalis;andAvr2-YAMOfromMagnaporthe grisea) and three species-specificAvrgenes (PWL1andPWL2fromM. griseaandinf1fromPhytophthora infestans) have been cloned. Isolation of additionalAvrgenes from these fungi, but also from other fungi such asUromyces vignae,Melampsora lini, Phytophthora sojae,andLeptosphaeria maculans,is in progress. Molecular analyses of nonfunctionalAvrgene alleles show that these originate from deletions or mutations in the open reading frame or the promoter sequence of anAvrgene. Although intrinsic biological functions of mostAvrgene products are still unknown, recent studies have shown that twoAvrgenes,nip1andEcp2, encode products that are important pathogenicity factors. All fungalAvrgenes cloned so far have been demonstrated or predicted to encode extracellular proteins. Current studies focus on unraveling the mechanisms of perception of avirulence factors by plant receptors. The exploitation ofAvrgenes and the matchingRgenes in engineered resistance is also discussed.     

Regulators of cell death in disease resistance

Cell death and disease resistance are intimately connected in plants. Plant disease resistance genes (R genes) are key components in pathogen perception and have a potential to activate cell death pathways. Analysis of R proteins suggests common molecular mechanisms for pathogen recognition and signal emission whereas the subsequent signalling unexpectedly involves a network of pathways of parallel, branching and converging action. Disease resistance signalling mutants have revealed novel types of regulatory proteins whose biochemical functions are still unknown. Accumulation of small molecules such as salicylic acid, reactive oxygen intermediates, and nitric oxide amplifies resistance responses and directs cells to initiate cell death programs. Genetic analyses of lesion mimic mutants provide a glimpse of how cell death thresholds are set via an interplay of positive and negative regulatory components.     

Biotechnological approaches for field applications of chitooligosaccharides (COS) to induce innate immunity in plants

Plants have evolved mechanisms to recognize a wide range of pathogen-derived molecules and to express induced resistance against pathogen attack. Exploitation of induced resistance, by application of novel bioactive elicitors, is an attractive alternative for crop protection. Chitooligosaccharide (COS) elicitors, released during plant fungal interactions, induce plant defenses upon recognition. Detailed analyses of structure/function relationships of bioactive chitosans as well as recent progress towards understanding the mechanism of COS sensing in plants through the identification and characterization of their cognate receptors have generated fresh impetus for approaches that would induce innate immunity in plants. These progresses combined with the application of chitin/chitosan/COS in disease management are reviewed here. In considering the field application of COS, however, efficient and large-scale production of desired COS is a challenging task. The available methods, including chemical or enzymatic hydrolysis and chemical or biotechnological synthesis to produce COS, are also reviewed.     

植物与病原菌互作的分子机制研究进展

植物的先天免疫主要包括模式识别受体对保守的微生物病原相关分子模式的识别和抗病蛋白对效应蛋白的识别。植物与病原体互作过程中存在广泛的信号交流,信号分子在植物与病原体的互作攻防中发挥了重要的调控作用,决定了二者的竞争关系。当前,大量植物与病原体互作中的信号分子被定位和克隆,其作用方式被揭示。本文总结了这些信号分子及其在植物免疫过程中的作用机制,主要包括植物细胞表面的模式识别受体分子对病原相关分子模式的识别与应答,植物抗病蛋白对病原体效应蛋白的识别与应答,以及免疫反应下游相关信号分子及其在植物抗病中的作用。此外,本文对未来相关研究提出了展望。