Radiotherapy in combination with low-dose chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

A previous preclinical study revealed that the maximal additive effect between chemotherapy (CT) and irradiation (RT) occurred at a low level of CT. Therapy was therefore designed with an oral drug daily given in combination with RT in order to determine the efficacy and toxicity. Locoregionally advanced head and neck tumor patients were treated with simultaneous RT and CT. RT was administered 5 times per week at 2 Gy per fraction in a total dose of 70 Gy. Throughout the treatment 30 mg/kg Tegafur was given daily orally. In the period between 2000 and 2002, 50 patients were enrolled. Complete remission was attained in 60%, with an overall response rate of 94%. Acute mucositis of grade 2 or 3 was observed in 56% (28 patients), and gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity of grade 2 or 3 occurred in 8% (4 patients). Because of side-effects, the duration of treatment was at most 2 weeks longer. Toxicity was eliminated quickly by careful supportive therapy. In conclusion, it is considered that oral low-dose CT in combination with RT is an efficient and simple mode of treatment for locally advanced head and neck tumor patients with a poor prognosis.     

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in locally advanced stage II-III gastric cancer: A single-centre retrospective study

BackgroundPD-1 blockade has been shown to have promising efficacy and acceptable safety profiles in advanced and metastatic gastric cancer; however, the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade-based immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remain uncertain.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients with LAGC who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by D2 radical resection at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2019 to 2021. The primary aim was to investigate the difference in pathological response rates between neoadjuvant PD-1 immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Multivariable models for pathological complete response (pCR) were constructed to investigate the factors that facilitate pCR. Trial registration: QYFYWZLL27406.ResultsA total of 77 patients were included in the analysis, among whom 34 (44.2%) received neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. A higher pCR rate was observed in the neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group (8 of 34, 23.5% vs. 2 of 43, 4.7%, P=0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of pCR revealed neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy regimen promoted pCR (OR 12.95, P=0.016). Regarding safety, 76.5% (26 of 34) of patients in the PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy group and 76.7% (33 of 43) of patients in the chemotherapy group experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and grade 3 or worse adverse events were 29.4% (10 of 34) and 34.9% (15 of 43), respectively.ConclusionNeoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy induced a higher pCR rate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the combined therapy was tolerable in LAGC patients.     

Comparison of efficacy of different route of administration of chemotherapy on unresectable, advanced gastric cancer

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two neoadjuvant chemotherapies (FLEEOX and XELOX) with different routes of administration for unresectable gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 85 patients with unresectable gastric cancer hospitalized from January 2007 to December 2009 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The FLEEOX group (48 patients) received the FLEEOX regimen(fluorouracil, leucovorin, epirubicin, epotoside, and oxaliplatin), which combined arterial with venous administration for one or two cycles, while the XELOX group (37 patients) received XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) via venous administration for two to four cycles. The clinical response and overall survival of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: In the FLEEOX group, the clinical response rate (RR) of chemotherapy was 85.4% (41 of 48 patients) and the median survival time was 25 months. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85.4% and 45.8%, respectively. In the XELOX group, the clinical RR was 59.5% and the median survival time was 9 months, while the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 35.2% and 8.3%, respectively. The clinical RR, the R0 resection rate, the median survival time, and the 1-year and 2-year DFS rates were significantly better (P <0.05) in the FLEEOX group than in the XELOX group. In addition, there were no significant differences in the rates of toxic and adverse reactions or post-operative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a preoperative diagnosis of unresectable gastric cancer, the efficacy of the FLEEOX regimen, which combines arterial with venous administration, was better than that of the XELOX regimen, using venous administration only. This combination of arterial and venous administration could be useful for improving the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.     

双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊对进展期胃癌术后化疗患者化疗副作用及肠道菌群的影响

目的 探讨口服双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊（BTVC）对进展期胃癌术后化疗患者的化疗副作用及肠道菌群影响。方法 选取铜陵市人民医院2016年2月至2017年1月收治的根治性胃癌术后首次化疗患者为研究对象,随机分成奥沙利铂+替吉奥联合化疗方案组32例（对照组）,奥沙利铂+卡培他滨+BTVC联合治疗组26例（观察组）。检测两组患者肠道菌群变化及记录患者不良反应情况。结果 治疗后对照组中白细胞＜3×109/L、粒细胞＜2×109/L、血红蛋白＜110 g/L、血小板＜100×109/L、肝功能损害、周围神经炎、恶心/呕吐、腹泻及Ⅲ/Ⅳ级不良反应发生例数均多于观察组（P＜0.05）。治疗前两组患者肠道各菌群数量差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;治疗后对照组患者乳杆菌、双歧杆菌数量及杆/球比明显少于观察组（P＜0.01）,而肠球菌、大肠埃希菌数量明显多于观察组（P＜0.01）。治疗后对照组患者乳杆菌、双歧杆菌数量及杆/球比明显少于治疗前（P＜0.01）,而肠球菌、大肠埃希菌数量多于治疗前（P＜0.05）。治疗后观察组患者乳杆菌、双歧杆菌数量及杆/球比多于治疗前（P＜0.05）;而肠球菌、大肠埃希菌数量与治疗前差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 BTVC对胃癌术后化疗副作用有预防作用,并可调节患者肠道菌群。     

Pharmaco-economic comparative evaluation of combination chronotherapy vs. standard chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Results of recent trials comparing combination chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FOL), and oxaliplatin, given either as flat (A) or chronomodulated (B) infusion for metastatic colorectal cancer, were subjected to pharmaco-economic evaluation. The overall cost of treatment with the flat and chronomodulated protocols was equivalent. The expense of the delivery of medications with the chronotherapeutic arm (B) was greater than with the standard arm (A) because it was feasible to administer more courses (requiring more frequent doctor visits) and higher doses (high cost of medications) with containment of toxic reactions. Chrono-arm B was definitively more cost-effective than standard flat-arm A treatment since it made the outcome of treatment more effective; there was greater tumor response rate and longer time to progression with less treatment-associated toxicity. Finally, selection of the Melodie brand infusion pump to deliver the chronotherapy resulted in a further 18% reduction of overall costs and made it possible for patients to enjoy increased autonomy and improved quality of life.     

Pharmaco-economic comparative evaluation of combination chronotherapy vs. standard chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Results of recent trials comparing combination chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FOL), and oxaliplatin, given either as flat (A) or chronomodulated (B) infusion for metastatic colorectal cancer, were subjected to pharmaco-economic evaluation. The overall cost of treatment with the flat and chronomodulated protocols was equivalent. The expense of the delivery of medications with the chronotherapeutic arm (B) was greater than with the standard arm (A) because it was feasible to administer more courses (requiring more frequent doctor visits) and higher doses (high cost of medications) with containment of toxic reactions. Chrono-arm B was definitively more cost-effective than standard flat-arm A treatment since it made the outcome of treatment more effective; there was greater tumor response rate and longer time to progression with less treatment-associated toxicity. Finally, selection of the Melodie brand infusion pump to deliver the chronotherapy resulted in a further 18% reduction of overall costs and made it possible for patients to enjoy increased autonomy and improved quality of life.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in woman with early or locally advanced cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is a major global health problem for women. Despite the screening and vaccines available today, it continues to be the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide with 85% of cases occurring in developing countries. Standard treatments for early or locally advanced cervical cancer are surgery (S) or concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to surgery or radiotherapy has been proposed and tested in clinical trials and has been included in clinical practice in some countries.In order to determine the true role of NACT either prior to S or RT in terms of achieving benefits in OS or DFS, randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses published from its beginnings to the present have been searched and analyzed in this study.The analysis of published clinical trials shows that NACT followed by S and NACT followed by RT have failed to demonstrate benefits in OS or DFS. Clinical trials comparing NACT followed by S versus exclusive RT have also been analyzed, where NACT followed by S could not show benefits for RT either.ConclusionAdding neoadjuvant chemotherapy to S or RT cannot be recommended outside the context of clinical trials.     

Combining interferon with cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer

Summary Laboratory studies have suggested therapeutic synergy between alpha-interferons and various cytotoxic agents. The present study set out to monitor the toxicity of giving a standard cytotoxic drug regimen with a well evaluated, low-dose, schedule of lymphoblastoid interferon. The combined treatment resulted in significantly greater leucopenia than was seen with cytotoxics alone and two patients developed severe infections. Although total numbers were small there was no evidence of increased therapeutic response in the combined treatment group. We would therefore suggest caution in future studies combining cytotoxic drugs and interferons as dose reductions of one or other modality is probably necessary.     

Antimalarial drug resistance and combination chemotherapy.

Antimarial drug resistance develops when spontaneously occurring parasite mutants with reduced susceptibility are selected, and are then transmitted. Drugs for which a single point mutation confers a marked reduction in susceptibility are particularly vulnerable. Low clearance and a shallow concentration-effect relationship increase the chance of selection. Use of combinations of antimalarials that do not share the same resistance mechanisms will reduce the chance of selection because the chance of a resistant mutant surviving is the product of the per parasite mutation rates for the individual drugs, multiplied by the number of parasites in an infection that are exposed to the drugs. Artemisinin derivatives are particularly effective combination partners because (i) they are very active antimalarials, producing up to 10,000-fold reductions in parasite biomass per asexual cycle; (ii) they reduce malaria transmissibility; and (iii) no resistance to these drugs has been reported yet. There are good arguments for no longer using antimalarial drugs alone in treatment, and instead always using a combination with artemisinin or one of its derivatives.