Quantitative criteria for improving performance of buccal DNA for high-throughput genetic analysis

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: DNA from buccal brush samples is being used for high-throughput analyses in a variety of applications, but the impact of sample type on genotyping success and downstream statistical analysis remains unclear. The objective of the current study was to determine laboratory predictors of genotyping failure among buccal DNA samples, and to evaluate the successfully genotyped results with respect to analytic quality control metrics. Sample and genotyping characteristics were compared between buccal and blood samples collected in the population-based Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Hemorrhagic Stroke (GERFHS) study (https://gerfhs.phs.wfubmc.edu/public/index.cfm). RESULTS: Seven-hundred eight (708) buccal and 142 blood DNA samples were analyzed for laboratory-based and analysis metrics. Overall genotyping failure rates were not statistically different between buccal (11.3%) and blood (7.0%, p = 0.18) samples; however, both the Contrast Quality Control (cQC) rate and the dynamic model (DM) call rates were lower among buccal DNA samples (p < 0.0001). The ratio of double-stranded to total DNA (ds/total ratio) in the buccal samples was the only laboratory characteristic predicting sample success (p < 0.0001). A threshold of at least 34% ds/total DNA provided specificity of 98.7% with a 90.5% negative predictive value for eliminating probable failures. After genotyping, median sample call rates (99.1% vs. 99.4%, p < 0.0001) and heterozygosity rates (25.6% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.006) were lower for buccal versus blood DNA samples, respectively, but absolute differences were small. Minor allele frequency differences from HapMap were smaller for buccal than blood samples, and both sample types demonstrated tight genotyping clusters, even for rare alleles. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a buccal sample characteristic, a ratio of ds/total DNA <34%, which distinguished buccal DNA samples likely to fail high-throughput genotyping. Applying this threshold, the quality of final genotyping resulting from buccal samples is somewhat lower, but compares favorably to blood. Caution is warranted if cases and controls have different sample types, but buccal samples provide comparable results to blood samples in large-scale genotyping analyses.     

Description of microsatellite markers and genotyping performances using feathers and buccal swabs for the Ivory gull (Pagophila eburnea)

We report 22 new polymorphic microsatellites for the Ivory gull (Pagophila eburnea), and we describe how they can be efficiently co-amplified using multiplexed polymerase chain reactions. In addition, we report DNA concentration, amplification success, rates of genotyping errors and the number of genotyping repetitions required to obtain reliable data with three types of noninvasive or nondestructive samples: shed feathers collected in colonies, feathers plucked from living individuals and buccal swabs. In two populations from Greenland (n=21) and Russia (Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago, n=21), the number of alleles per locus varied between 2 and 17, and expected heterozygosity per population ranged from 0.18 to 0.92. Twenty of the markers conformed to Hardy-Weinberg and linkage equilibrium expectations. Most markers were easily amplified and highly reliable when analysed from buccal swabs and plucked feathers, showing that buccal swabbing is a very efficient approach allowing good quality DNA retrieval. Although DNA amplification success using single shed feathers was generally high, the genotypes obtained from this type of samples were prone to error and thus need to be amplified several times. The set of microsatellite markers described here together with multiplex amplification conditions and genotyping error rates will be useful for population genetic studies of the Ivory gull.     

Canine DNA subjected to whole genome amplification is suitable for a wide range of molecular applications

Molecular and genetic studies of canine disease phenotypes can be limited by the amount of DNA available for analysis. New methods have been developed to amplify the genomic DNA of a species producing large quantities of DNA from small starting amounts. Whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA is now being used in human studies, although this technique has not been applied extensively in veterinary research. We evaluated WGA of canine DNA for suitability in a range of molecular tests. DNA from 93 canine blood extracted and 18 buccal swab samples was subjected to WGA using the GenomiPhi kit (Amersham). Genomic DNA was compared with WGA product using a range of techniques, including reference strand-mediated conformation analysis, denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography analysis, microsatellite genotyping, direct DNA sequencing, and single nucleotide polymorphism allelic discrimination. All samples amplified well, giving an average yield of 3 mug of DNA from 2.5 ng of starting material. Extremely high levels of experimental reproducibility and concordance were observed between source and WGA DNA samples for all analyses used: greater than 95% for blood extracted DNA and greater than 80% for buccal swab DNA. These studies clearly demonstrate the usefulness of WGA of canine DNA as a means of increasing DNA quantities for canine studies. This technique will have major implications for future veterinary research.     

High fractions of exogenous DNA in human buccal samples reduce the quality of large-scale genotyping

Buccal cell samples are considered a reliable source of DNA for genotyping studies. However, a potential drawback is the presence of exogenous DNA that is coextracted with human genomic DNA. A set of saliva and cheek swab samples, in which the fraction of human DNA varies from 10 to 96%, was genotyped using the Affymetrix Mapping 500 K Array. Samples containing less than 30% human DNA performed poorly in terms of accuracy and reliability. Therefore, we recommend quantitating the amount of human DNA in buccal samples to be used for large-scale genotyping and eliminating samples with less than 30% human DNA.     

Large-scale SNP genotyping with canine buccal swab DNA

The dog is an attractive model for genetic studies of complex disease. With drafts of the canine genome complete, a large number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are potentially useful for gene-mapping studies and empirical estimations of canine diversity and linkage disequilibrium (LD) are now available. Unfortunately, most canine SNPs remain uncharacterized, and the amount and quality of DNA available from population-based samples are limited. We assessed how these real-world challenges influence automated SNP genotyping methods such as Illumina's GoldenGate assay. We examined 384 SNPs on canine chromosome 9 and successfully genotyped a minimum of 217 and a maximum of 275 SNPs using buccal swab samples for 181 dogs (86 beagles, 76 border collies, and 15 Australian shepherds). Call rates per SNP and sample averaged 97%, with reproducibility within and between analyses averaging 98%. The majority of these SNPs were polymorphic across all 3 breeds. We observed extensive LD, albeit less than reported for surveys using fewer dogs, consistent between breeds. Analyses of population substructure indicated that beagles are distinct from border collies and Australian shepherds. These results demonstrate the suitability of amplified canine buccal samples for high-throughput multiplex genotyping and confirm extensive LD in the dog.     

Genotyping performance assessment of whole genome amplified DNA with respect to multiplexing level of assay and its period of storage

Whole genome amplification can faithfully amplify genomic DNA (gDNA) with minimal bias and substantial genome coverage. Whole genome amplified DNA (wgaDNA) has been tested to be workable for high-throughput genotyping arrays. However, issues about whether wgaDNA would decrease genotyping performance at increasing multiplexing levels and whether the storage period of wgaDNA would reduce genotyping performance have not been examined. Using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX Gold assays, we investigated 174 single nucleotide polymorphisms for 3 groups of matched samples: group 1 of 20 gDNA samples, group 2 of 20 freshly prepared wgaDNA samples, and group 3 of 20 stored wgaDNA samples that had been kept frozen at -70°C for 18 months. MassARRAY is a medium-throughput genotyping platform with reaction chemistry different from those of high-throughput genotyping arrays. The results showed that genotyping performance (efficiency and accuracy) of freshly prepared wgaDNA was similar to that of gDNA at various multiplexing levels (17-plex, 21-plex, 28-plex and 36-plex) of the MassARRAY assays. However, compared with gDNA or freshly prepared wgaDNA, stored wgaDNA was found to give diminished genotyping performance (efficiency and accuracy) due to potentially inferior quality. Consequently, no matter whether gDNA or wgaDNA was used, better genotyping efficiency would tend to have better genotyping accuracy.     

Use of whole genome amplification to rescue DNA from plasma samples

While DNA of good quality and sufficient amount can be obtained easily from whole blood, buccal swabs, surgical specimens, or cell lines, these DNA-rich sources are not always available. This is particularly the case in studies for which biological specimens were collected when genotyping assays were not widely available. In those studies, serum or plasma is often the only source of DNA. Newly developed whole genome amplification (WGA) methods, based on phi29 polymerase, may play a significant role in recovering DNA in such instances. We tested a total of 528 plasma samples kept in storage at -40 degrees C for approximately 10 years for 8 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using the 5' exonuclease (TaqMan) assay. These specimens yielded undetectable levels of DNA following extraction with an affinity column but produced an average 52.7 microg (standard deviation of 31.2 microg) of DNA when column-extracted DNA was used as a template for WGA. This increased the genotyping success rate from 54% to 93%. There were only 3 disagreements out of 364 paired genotyping results for pre- and post-WGA DNAs, indicating an error rate of 0.82%. These results are encouraging for expanding the use of poor DNA resources in genotyping studies.     

Whole genome amplification: abundant supplies of DNA from precious samples or clinical specimens

Whole genome amplification methods are used to generate the large amounts of DNA that are required for genetic testing. Preparation of genomic DNA from clinical samples is a bottleneck in high-throughput genotyping and is frequently limited by the amount of specimen available. Precious DNA collections used for association and linkage analysis can be a nonrenewable resource available to only a limited number of laboratories. To address these needs, amplified DNA is now being used in a growing number of research and diagnostic applications. A new method, called multiple displacement amplification, dramatically improves the high-fidelity reproduction of genomic DNA, with 10–100 kb amplified DNA products providing uniform coverage of genes.     

Buccal cells as a source of DNA for comparative animal genomic analysis

The source of DNA of adequate quality and quantity is an important consideration in genome analysis. In many animal and livestock species, easy access to DNA will facilitate the rapid and reliable genotyping of a large number of individual individuals. Here, we describe the use, for the first time, of buccal cells from non-human mammalian species as a source of DNA template for PCR and restriction analysis. The buccal cells from the pig, cow and human, were used to amplify PCR fragments that were scanned SNPs and for comparative genome analysis. The work indicates that buccal cells are also adequate sources of DNA for genome analysis of animals that have been identified as priorities in comparative genomics.     

DNA from Buccal Swabs Suitable for High-Throughput SNP Multiplex Analysis

We sought a convenient and reliable method for collection of genetic material that is inexpensive and noninvasive and suitable for self-collection and mailing and a compatible, commercial DNA extraction protocol to meet quantitative and qualitative requirements for high-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) multiplex analysis on an automated platform. Buccal swabs were collected from 34 individuals as part of a pilot study to test commercially available buccal swabs and DNA extraction kits. DNA was quantified on a spectrofluorometer with Picogreen dsDNA prior to testing the DNA integrity with predesigned SNP multiplex assays. Based on the pilot study results, the Catch-All swabs and Isohelix buccal DNA isolation kit were selected for our high-throughput application and extended to a further 1140 samples as part of a large cohort study. The average DNA yield in the pilot study (n=34) was 1.94 μg ± 0.54 with a 94% genotyping pass rate. For the high-throughput application (n=1140), the average DNA yield was 2.44 μg ± 1.74 with a ≥93% genotyping pass rate. The Catch-All buccal swabs are a convenient and cost-effective alternative to blood sampling. Combined with the Isohelix buccal DNA isolation kit, they provided DNA of sufficient quantity and quality for high-throughput SNP multiplex analysis.     

Highly accurate SNP genotyping from historical and low‐quality samples

Historical and other poor‐quality samples are often necessary for population genetics, conservation, and forensics studies. Although there is a long history of using mtDNA from such samples, obtaining and genotyping nuclear loci have been considered difficult and error‐prone at best, and impossible at worst. The primary issues are the amount of nuclear DNA available for genotyping, and the degradation of the DNA into small fragments. Single nucleotide polymorphisms offer potential advantages for assaying nuclear variation in historical and poor‐quality samples, because the amplified fragments can be very small, varying little or not at all in size between alleles, and can be amplified efficiently by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We present a method for highly multiplexed PCR of SNP loci, followed by dual‐fluorescence genotyping that is very effective for genotyping poor‐quality samples, and can potentially use very little template DNA, regardless of the number of loci to be genotyped. We genotyped 19 SNP loci from DNA extracted from modern and historical bowhead whale tissue, bone and baleen samples. The PCR failure rate was < 1.5%, and the genotyping error rate was 0.1% when DNA samples contained > 10 copies/µL of a 51‐bp nuclear sequence. Among samples with ≤ 10 copies/µL DNA, samples could still be genotyped confidently with appropriate levels of replication from independent multiplex PCRs.     

High accuracy genotyping directly from genomic DNA using a rolling circle amplification based assay

Background

Rolling circle amplification of ligated probes is a simple and sensitive means for genotyping directly from genomic DNA. SNPs and mutations are interrogated with open circle probes (OCP) that can be circularized by DNA ligase when the probe matches the genotype. An amplified detection signal is generated by exponential rolling circle amplification (ERCA) of the circularized probe. The low cost and scalability of ligation/ERCA genotyping makes it ideally suited for automated, high throughput methods.

Results

A retrospective study using human genomic DNA samples of known genotype was performed for four different clinically relevant mutations: Factor V Leiden, Factor II prothrombin, and two hemochromatosis mutations, C282Y and H63D. Greater than 99% accuracy was obtained genotyping genomic DNA samples from hundreds of different individuals. The combined process of ligation/ERCA was performed in a single tube and produced fluorescent signal directly from genomic DNA in less than an hour. In each assay, the probes for both normal and mutant alleles were combined in a single reaction. Multiple ERCA primers combined with a quenched-peptide nucleic acid (Q-PNA) fluorescent detection system greatly accellerated the appearance of signal. Probes designed with hairpin structures reduced misamplification. Genotyping accuracy was identical from either purified genomic DNA or genomic DNA generated using whole genome amplification (WGA). Fluorescent signal output was measured in real time and as an end point.

Conclusions

Combining the optimal elements for ligation/ERCA genotyping has resulted in a highly accurate single tube assay for genotyping directly from genomic DNA samples. Accuracy exceeded 99 % for four probe sets targeting clinically relevant mutations. No genotypes were called incorrectly using either genomic DNA or whole genome amplified sample.     

Multiple Displacement Amplification for Generating an Unlimited Source of DNA for Genotyping in Nonhuman Primate Species

We evaluated a whole genome amplification method—multiple displacement amplification (MDA)—as a means to conserve valuable nonhuman primate samples. We tested 148 samples from a variety of species and sample sources, including blood, tissue, cell-lines, plucked hair and noninvasively collected semen. To evaluate genotyping success and accuracy of MDA, we used routine genotyping methods, including short tandem repeat (STR) analysis, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), Alu repeat analysis, direct sequencing, and nucleotide detection by tag-array minisequencing. We compared genotyping results from MDA products to genotypes generated from the original (non-MD amplified) DNA samples. All genotyping methods showed good results with the MDA products as a DNA template, and for some samples MDA improved genotyping success. We show that the MDA procedure has the potential to provide a long-lasting source of DNA for genetic studies, which would be highly valuable for the primate research field, in which genetic resources are limited and for other species in which similar sampling constraints apply.     

Apolipoprotein E genotyping using the polymerase chain reaction and allele-specific oligonucleotide primers

A method for apolipoprotein (apo) E genotyping was developed using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with allele-specific oligonucleotide primers (ASP). Synthetic oligonucleotides with base-pair mismatches at the 3' terminus were used as primers to amplify the apoE gene in subjects previously phenotyped using isoelectric focusing (IEF). Complementary primer-allele combinations were specifically amplified by PCR, together with a control pair of primers specific to the human prothrombin gene. Identification of genotype by PCR using ASP was consistent with the phenotypes that were determined by IEF for 14 healthy normolipidemic subjects. These results were achieved using DNA isolated from buccal epithelial cells obtained from a mouthwash or DNA extracted from leukocytes. Genotype identification required analysis of the PCR products on an ethidium-stained agarose gel, yielding results 3 h after DNA extraction. In comparison with other current methods, PCR using ASP is suggested as a rapid and simple noninvasive technique for determining population apoE allelic distribution.     

A method for counting PCR template molecules with application to next-generation sequencing

Amplification by polymerase chain reaction is often used in the preparation of template DNA molecules for next-generation sequencing. Amplification increases the number of available molecules for sequencing but changes the representation of the template molecules in the amplified product and introduces random errors. Such changes in representation hinder applications requiring accurate quantification of template molecules, such as allele calling or estimation of microbial diversity. We present a simple method to count the number of template molecules using degenerate bases and show that it improves genotyping accuracy and removes noise from PCR amplification. This method can be easily added to existing DNA library preparation techniques and can improve the accuracy of variant calling.     

Nucleic acid from saliva and salivary cells for noninvasive genotyping of Crohn's disease patients

CARD15 genes carrying the 3020insC frameshift polymorphism encode a truncated CARD15 protein that is unresponsive to bacterial muramyl dipeptide, and are strongly associated with increased susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD). In this study we established that CARD15 gene sequences encompassing the major 3020insC polymorphism could be readily amplified from the DNA found in saliva. In addition, CARD15 RNA sequences can be readily derived from the cellular component of saliva, which is primarily comprised of buccal epithelial cells. Our results demonstrate that saliva is a readily accessible source of DNA and RNA for genotyping CD patients for variants of the CARD15 gene, representing an alternative source of nucleic acid to that obtained from venous blood.     

Construction of microarrays for genotyping of DQA using unmodified 45-mer oligonucleotide

The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II system is strongly connected to immunological response and its compatibility between tissues is critical in transplantation. The simple robust typing analyses of HLA genes are extremely important. In this paper, we developed an approach based on microarray technology for genotyping of DQA gene. The microarrays were constructed with a total 31 unmodified 45-mer oligonucleotide. The second exon of DQA gene was amplified, and allowed to hybridize with the array. DQA genotypes were assigned by quantitative analysis of the hybridization results. The arrays were evaluated by DQA genotyping of nine reference samples and 120 clinical samples. The results demonstrate that the genotyping accuracy/concordance achieved 97.5% compared with the direct DNA sequencing. Although our methods did not perform high-resolution genotyping, it could be an alternative for serological typing in routine medical practice.     

Buccal swabs allow efficient and reliable microsatellite genotyping in amphibians

Buccal swabs have recently been used as a minimally invasive sampling method in genetic studies of wild populations, including amphibian species. Yet it is not known to date what is the level of reliability for microsatellite genotypes obtained using such samples. Allelic dropout and false alleles may affect the genotyping derived from buccal samples. Here we quantified the success of microsatellite amplification and the rates of genotyping errors using buccal swabs in two amphibian species, the Alpine newt Triturus alpestris and the Green tree frog Hyla arborea, and we estimated two important parameters for downstream analyses, namely the number of repetitions required to achieve typing reliability and the probability of identity among genotypes. Amplification success was high, and only one locus tested required two to three repetitions to achieve reliable genotypes, showing that buccal swabbing is a very efficient approach allowing good quality DNA retrieval. This sampling method which allows avoiding the controversial toe-clipping will likely prove very useful in the context of amphibian conservation.     

Evaluation of buccal cell collection protocols for genetic susceptibility studies

Buccal cells are increasingly used as a source of quality DNA to improve participation rates in molecular studies. Here, three buccal cell collection protocols were compared to determine factors affecting the yield of cells, total DNA per sample, and DNA yield per cell. In addition, kinetic quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (TaqMan™) was used to quantify human DNA available for PCR. The method of collection used influenced the overall DNA yield per sample. The collection buffer used influenced the number of cells but not the overall DNA yield per sample. Repeated freezing and thawing did not affect overall DNA yield per sample, DNA yield per cell, or the total number of cells collected. Mouthwashes had the highest DNA yield per sample (20.8 µg) compared with cytobrush samples (1.9 µg from three cytobrushes) and tongue depressors (0.8 µg from three tongue depressors). However, mouthwash samples may contain significant non-human DNA and other contaminants that could interfere with some molecular studies. Spectrometry grossly overestimated the total DNA recovered from mouthwash samples compared with fluorometry or quantitative PCR.     

Evaluation of buccal cell collection protocols for genetic susceptibility studies

Buccal cells are increasingly used as a source of quality DNA to improve participation rates in molecular studies. Here, three buccal cell collection protocols were compared to determine factors affecting the yield of cells, total DNA per sample, and DNA yield per cell. In addition, kinetic quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (TaqMan?) was used to quantify human DNA available for PCR. The method of collection used influenced the overall DNA yield per sample. The collection buffer used influenced the number of cells but not the overall DNA yield per sample. Repeated freezing and thawing did not affect overall DNA yield per sample, DNA yield per cell, or the total number of cells collected. Mouthwashes had the highest DNA yield per sample (20.8 μg) compared with cytobrush samples (1.9 μg from three cytobrushes) and tongue depressors (0.8 μg from three tongue depressors). However, mouthwash samples may contain significant non-human DNA and other contaminants that could interfere with some molecular studies. Spectrometry grossly overestimated the total DNA recovered from mouthwash samples compared with fluorometry or quantitative PCR.