Interaction between the T4 helicase loading protein (gp59) and the DNA polymerase (gp43): unlocking of the gp59-gp43-DNA complex to initiate assembly of a fully functional replisome

Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer and functional assays have been used to study the initiation and regulation of the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication system. Previous work has demonstrated that a complex of the helicase loading protein (gp59) and the DNA polymerase (gp43) on forked DNA totally inhibits the polymerase and exonuclease activities of gp43 by a molecular locking mechanism (Xi, J., Zhuang, Z., Zhang, Z., Selzer, T., Spiering, M. M., Hammes, G. G., and Benkovic, S. J. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 2305-2318). We now show that this complex is "unlocked" by the addition of the helicase (gp41) with restoration of the DNA polymerase activity. Gp59 retains its ability to load the helicase while forming a gp59-gp43 complex at a DNA fork in the presence of the single-stranded DNA binding protein (gp32). Upon the addition of gp41 and MgATP, gp59 dissociates from the complex, and the DNA-bound gp41 is capable of recruiting the primase (gp61) to form a functional primosome and, subsequently, a fully active replisome. Functional assays of leading- and lagging-strand synthesis on an active replication fork show that the absence of gp59 has no effect on the coupling of leading- and lagging-strand synthesis or on the size of the Okazaki DNA fragments. We conclude that gp59 acts in a manner similar to the clamp loader to ensure proper assembly of the replisome and does not remain as a replisome component during active replication.     

Protein-protein interactions in the bacteriophage T4 replisome. The leading strand holoenzyme is physically linked to the lagging strand holoenzyme and the primosome

The bacteriophage T4 replication complex is composed of eight proteins that function together to replicate DNA. This replisome can be broken down into four basic units: a primosome composed of gp41, gp61, and gp59; a leading strand holoenzyme composed of gp43, gp44/62, and gp45; a lagging strand holoenzyme; and a single strand binding protein polymer. These units interact further to form the complete replisome. The leading and lagging strand polymerases are physically linked in the presence of DNA or an active replisome. The region of interaction was mapped to an extension of the finger domain, such that Cys-507 of one subunit is in close proximity to Cys-507 of a second subunit. The leading strand polymerase and the primosome also associate, such that gp59 mediates the contact between the two complexes. Binding of gp43 to the primosome complex causes displacement of gp32 from the gp59.gp61.gp41 primosome complex. The resultant species is a complex of proteins that may allow coordinated leading and lagging strand synthesis, helicase DNA unwinding activity, and polymerase nucleotide incorporation.     

Molecular mechanisms of the functional coupling of the helicase (gp41) and polymerase (gp43) of bacteriophage T4 within the DNA replication fork

Processive strand-displacement DNA synthesis with the T4 replication system requires functional "coupling" between the DNA polymerase (gp43) and the helicase (gp41). To define the physical basis of this functional coupling, we have used analytical ultracentrifugation to show that gp43 is a monomeric species at physiological protein concentrations and that gp41 and gp43 do not physically interact in the absence of DNA, suggesting that the functional coupling between gp41 and gp43 depends significantly on interactions modulated by the replication fork DNA. Results from strand-displacement DNA synthesis show that a minimal gp41-gp43 replication complex can perform strand-displacement synthesis at approximately 90 nts/s in a solution containing poly(ethylene glycol) to drive helicase loading. In contrast, neither the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I nor the T7 DNA polymerase, both of which are nonprocessive polymerases, can carry out strand-displacement DNA synthesis with gp41, suggesting that the functional helicase-polymerase coupling may require the homologous system. However, we show that a heterologous helicase-polymerase pair can work if the polymerase is processive. Strand-displacement DNA synthesis using the gp41 helicase with the T4 DNA polymerase holoenzyme or the phage T7 DNA polymerase-thioredoxin complex, both of which are processive, proceeds at the rate of approximately 250 nts/s. However, replication fork assembly is less efficient with the heterologous helicase-polymerase pair. Therefore, a processive (homologous or heterologous) "trailing" DNA polymerase is sufficient to improve gp41 processivity and unwinding activity in the elongation stage of the helicase reaction, and specific T4 helicase-polymerase coupling becomes significant only in the assembly (or initiation) stage.     

Bacteriophage T4 helicase loader protein gp59 functions as gatekeeper in origin-dependent replication in vivo

Bacteriophage T4 initiates origin-dependent replication via an R-loop mechanism in vivo. During in vitro reactions, the phage-encoded gp59 stimulates loading of the replicative helicase, gp41, onto branched intermediates, including origin R-loops. However, although gp59 is essential for recombination-dependent replication from D-loops, it does not appear to be required for origin-dependent replication in vivo. In this study, we have analyzed the origin-replicative intermediates formed during infections that are deficient in gp59 and other phage replication proteins. During infections lacking gp59, the initial replication forks from two different T4 origins actively replicated both leading- and lagging-strands. However, the retrograde replication forks from both origins were abnormal in the gp59-deficient infections. The lagging-strand from the initial fork was elongated as a new leading-strand in the retrograde direction without lagging-strand synthesis, whereas in the wild-type, leading- and lagging-strand synthesis appeared to be coupled. These results imply that gp59 inhibits the polymerase holoenzyme in vivo until the helicase-primase (gp41-gp61) complex is loaded, and we thereby refer to gp59 as a gatekeeper. We also found that all origin-replicative intermediates were absent in infections deficient in the helicase gp41 or the single-strand-binding protein gp32, regardless of whether gp59 was present or absent. These results argue that replication from the origin in vivo is dependent on both the helicase and single-strand-binding protein and demonstrate that the strong replication defect of gene 41 and 32 single mutants is not caused by gp59 inhibition of the polymerase.     

Conditional coupling of leading-strand and lagging-strand DNA synthesis at bacteriophage T4 replication forks

Eight proteins encoded by bacteriophage T4 are required for the replicative synthesis of the leading and lagging strands of T4 DNA. We show here that active T4 replication forks, which catalyze the coordinated synthesis of leading and lagging strands, remain stable in the face of dilution provided that the gp44/62 clamp loader, the gp45 sliding clamp, and the gp32 ssDNA-binding protein are present at sufficient levels after dilution. If any of these accessory proteins is omitted from the dilution mixture, uncoordinated DNA synthesis occurs, and/or large Okazaki fragments are formed. Thus, the accessory proteins must be recruited from solution for each round of initiation of lagging-strand synthesis. A modified bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase) can replace the T4 DNA polymerase for leading-strand synthesis but not for well coordinated lagging-strand synthesis. Although T4 DNA polymerase has been reported to self-associate, gel-exclusion chromatography displays it as a monomer in solution in the absence of DNA. It forms no stable holoenzyme complex in solution with the accessory proteins or with the gp41-gp61 helicase-primase. Instead, template DNA is required for the assembly of the T4 replication complex, which then catalyzes coordinated synthesis of leading and lagging strands in a conditionally coupled manner.     

Structure of the SSB-DNA polymerase III interface and its role in DNA replication

Interactions between single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) and the DNA replication machinery are found in all organisms, but the roles of these contacts remain poorly defined. In Escherichia coli, SSB's association with the χ subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme has been proposed to confer stability to the replisome and to aid delivery of primers to the lagging-strand DNA polymerase. Here, the SSB-binding site on χ is identified crystallographically and biochemical and cellular studies delineate the consequences of destabilizing the χ/SSB interface. An essential role for the χ/SSB interaction in lagging-strand primer utilization is not supported. However, sequence changes in χ that block complex formation with SSB lead to salt-dependent uncoupling of leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis and to a surprising obstruction of the leading-strand DNA polymerase in vitro, pointing to roles for the χ/SSB complex in replisome establishment and maintenance. Destabilization of the χ/SSB complex in vivo produces cells with temperature-dependent cell cycle defects that appear to arise from replisome instability.     

Single-molecule investigation of the T4 bacteriophage DNA polymerase holoenzyme: multiple pathways of holoenzyme formation

In T4 bacteriophage, the DNA polymerase holoenzyme is responsible for accurate and processive DNA synthesis. The holoenzyme consists of DNA polymerase gp43 and clamp protein gp45. To form a productive holoenzyme complex, clamp loader protein gp44/62 is required for the loading of gp45, along with MgATP, and also for the subsequent binding of polymerase to the loaded clamp. Recently published evidence suggests that holoenzyme assembly in the T4 replisome may take place via more than one pathway [Zhuang, Z., Berdis, A. J., and Benkovic, S. J. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 7976-7989]. To demonstrate unequivocally whether there are multiple pathways leading to the formation of a productive holoenzyme, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy has been used to study the potential clamp loading and holoenzyme assembly pathways on a single-molecule DNA substrate. The results obtained reveal four pathways that foster the formation of a functional holoenzyme on DNA: (1) clamp loader-clamp complex binding to DNA followed by polymerase, (2) clamp loader binding to DNA followed by clamp and then polymerase, (3) clamp binding to DNA followed by clamp loader and then polymerase, and (4) polymerase binding to DNA followed by the clamp loader-clamp complex. In all cases, MgATP is required. The possible physiological significance of the various assembly pathways is discussed in the context of replication initiation and lagging strand synthesis during various stages of T4 phage replication.     

PriA and phage T4 gp59: factors that promote DNA replication on forked DNA substrates microreview

The initiation of DNA synthesis on forked DNA templates is a vital process in the replication and maintenance of cellular chromosomes. Two proteins that promote replisome assembly on DNA forks have so far been identified. In phage T4 development the gene 59 protein (gp59) assembles replisomes at D-loops, the sites of homologous strand exchange. Bacterial PriA protein plays an analogous function, most probably restarting replication after replication fork arrest with the aid of homologous recombination proteins, and PriA is also required for phage Mu replication by transposition. Gp59 and PriA exhibit similar DNA fork binding activities, but PriA also has a 3' to 5' helicase activity that can promote duplex opening for replisome assembly. The helicase activity allows PriA's repertoire of templates to be more diverse than that of gp59. It may give PriA the versatility to restart DNA replication without recombination on arrested replication forks that lack appropriate duplex openings.     

Dynamic protein interactions in the bacteriophage T4 replisome

The bacteriophage T4 DNA replisome is a complex dynamic system employing a variety of proteins to orchestrate the synthesis of DNA on both the leading and lagging strands. Assembly of the protein complexes responsible for DNA synthesis and priming requires the coordination of transient biomolecular interactions. This interplay of proteins has been dissected through the use of small molecules including fluorescent probes and crosslinkers, enabling the development of a complex dynamic structural and kinetic model for DNA polymerase holoenzyme assembly and primosome formation.     

The phiX174-type primosome promotes replisome assembly at the site of recombination in bacteriophage Mu transposition.

Initiation of Escherichia coli DNA synthesis primed by homologous recombination is believed to require the phiX174-type primosome, a mobile priming apparatus assembled without the initiator protein DnaA. We show that this primosome plays an essential role in bacteriophage Mu DNA replication by transposition. Upon promoting transfer of Mu ends to target DNA, the Mu transpososome undergoes transition to a pre-replisome that permits initiation of DNA synthesis only in the presence of primosome assembly proteins PriA, DnaT, DnaB and DnaC. These assembly proteins promote the engagement of primase and DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, initiating semi-discontinuous replication preferentially at the Mu left end. The results indicate that these proteins play a crucial role in promoting replisome assembly on a recombination intermediate.     

Coordinated leading- and lagging-strand synthesis at the Escherichia coli DNA replication fork. III. A polymerase-primase interaction governs primer size.

Studies with a rolling-circle DNA replication system reconstituted in vitro with a tailed form II DNA template, the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (Pol III HE), the Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein, and the primosome, showed that within the context of a replication fork, the oligoribonucleotide primers that were formed were limited to a length in the range of 9 to 14 nucleotides, regardless of whether they were subsequently elongated by the lagging-strand DNA polymerase. This is in contrast to the 8-60-nucleotide-long primers synthesized by the primosome in the absence of DNA replication on a bacteriophage phi X174 DNA template, although when primer synthesis and DNA replication were catalyzed concurrently in this system, the extent of RNA polymerization decreased. As described in this report, we therefore examined the effect of the DNA Pol III HE on the length of primers synthesized by primase in vitro in the absence of DNA replication. When primer synthesis was catalyzed either: i) by the primosome on a phi X174 DNA template, ii) by primase on naked DNA with the aid of the DnaB protein (general priming), or iii) by primase alone at the bacteriophage G4 origin, the presence of the DNA Pol III HE in the reaction mixtures resulted in a universal reduction in the length of the heterogeneous RNA products to a uniform size of approximately 10 nucleotides. dNTPs were not required, and the addition of dGMP, an inhibitor of the 3'----5' exonuclease of the DNA Pol III HE, did not alter the effect; therefore, neither the 5'----3' DNA polymerase activity nor the 3'----5' exonuclease activity of the DNA Pol III HE was involved. E. coli DNA polymerase I, and the DNA polymerases of bacteriophages T4 and T7 could not substitute for the DNA Pol III HE. The Pol III core plays a crucial role in mediating this effect, although other subunits of the DNA Pol III HE are also required. These observations suggest that the association of primase with the DNA Pol III HE during primer synthesis regulates its catalytic activity and that this regulatory interaction occurs independently of, and prior to, formation of a preinitiation complex of the DNA Pol III HE on the primer terminus.     

Replisome structure suggests mechanism for continuous fork progression and post-replication repair

What happens to DNA replication when it encounters a damaged or nicked DNA template has been under investigation for five decades. Initially it was thought that DNA polymerase, and thus the replication-fork progression, would stall at road blocks. After the discovery of replication-fork helicase and replication re-initiation factors by the 1990s, it became clear that the replisome can “skip” impasses and finish replication with single-stranded gaps and double-strand breaks in the product DNA. But the mechanism for continuous fork progression after encountering roadblocks is entangled with translesion synthesis, replication fork reversal and recombination repair. The recently determined structure of the bacteriophage T7 replisome offers the first glimpse of how helicase, primase, leading-and lagging-strand DNA polymerases are organized around a DNA replication fork. The tightly coupled leading-strand polymerase and lagging-strand helicase provides a scaffold to consolidate data accumulated over the past five decades and offers a fresh perspective on how the replisome may skip lesions and complete discontinuous DNA synthesis. Comparison of the independently evolved bacterial and eukaryotic replisomes suggests that repair of discontinuous DNA synthesis occurs post replication in both.     

Coordinated leading- and lagging-strand synthesis at the Escherichia coli DNA replication fork. IV. Reconstitution of an asymmetric, dimeric DNA polymerase III holoenzyme.

Individually purified subunits have been used to reconstitute the action of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (Pol III HE) at a replication fork formed in the presence of the primosome, the single-stranded DNA binding protein, and a tailed form II DNA template. Complete activity, indistinguishable from that of the intact DNA Pol III HE, could be reproduced with a combination of the DNA polymerase III core (Pol III core), the gamma.delta complex, and the beta subunit. Experiments where the Pol III core in reaction mixtures containing active replication forks was diluted suggested that the lagging-strand Pol III core remained associated continuously with the replication fork through multiple cycles of Okazaki fragment synthesis. Since the lagging-strand Pol III core must dissociate from the 3' end of the completed Okazaki fragment, this suggests that its association with the fork is via protein-protein interactions, lending credence to the idea that it forms a dimeric complex with the leading-strand Pol III core. An asymmetry in the action of the subunits was revealed under conditions (high ionic strength) that were presumably destabilizing to the integrity of the replication fork. Under these conditions, tau acted to stimulate DNA synthesis only when the primase was present (i.e. when lagging-strand DNA synthesis was ongoing). This stimulation was reflected by an inhibition of the formation of small Okazaki fragments, suggesting that, within the context of the model developed to account for the temporal order of steps during a cycle of Okazaki fragment synthesis, the presence of tau accelerated the transit of the lagging-strand Pol III core from the 3' end of the completed Okazaki fragment to the 3' end of the new primer.     

Insights into Okazaki Fragment Synthesis by the T4 Replisome: THE FATE OF LAGGING-STRAND HOLOENZYME COMPONENTS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON OKAZAKI FRAGMENT SIZE*

In this study, we employed a circular replication substrate with a low priming site frequency (1 site/1.1 kb) to quantitatively examine the size distribution and formation pattern of Okazaki fragments. Replication reactions by the T4 replisome on this substrate yielded a patterned series of Okazaki fragments whose size distribution shifted through collision and signaling mechanisms as the gp44/62 clamp loader levels changed but was insensitive to changes in the gp43 polymerase concentration, as expected for a processive, recycled lagging-strand polymerase. In addition, we showed that only one gp45 clamp is continuously associated with the replisome and that no additional clamps accumulate on the DNA, providing further evidence that the clamp departs, whereas the polymerase is recycled upon completion of an Okazaki fragment synthesis cycle. We found no support for the participation of a third polymerase in Okazaki fragment synthesis.     

A novel DNA nuclease is stimulated by association with the GINS complex

Chromosomal DNA replication requires the spatial and temporal coordination of the activities of several complexes that constitute the replisome. A previously uncharacterized protein, encoded by TK1252 in the archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis, was shown to stably interact with the archaeal GINS complex in vivo, a central component of the archaeal replisome. Here, we document that this protein (TK1252p) is a processive, single-strand DNA-specific exonuclease that degrades DNA in the 5' → 3' direction. TK1252p binds specifically to the GINS15 subunit of T. kodakaraensis GINS complex and this interaction stimulates the exonuclease activity in vitro. This novel archaeal nuclease, designated GINS-associated nuclease (GAN), also forms a complex in vivo with the euryarchaeal-specific DNA polymerase D. Roles for GAN in replisome assembly and DNA replication are discussed.     

Interactions of bacteriophage T4-coded primase (gp61) with the T4 replication helicase (gp41) and DNA in primosome formation.

One primase (gp61) and six helicase (gp41) subunits interact to form the bacteriophage T4-coded primosome at the DNA replication fork. In order to map some of the detailed interactions of the primase within the primosome, we have constructed and characterized variants of the gp61 primase that carry kinase tags at either the N or the C terminus of the polypeptide chain. These tagged gp61 constructs have been probed using several analytical methods. Proteolytic digestion and protein kinase protection experiments show that specific interactions with single-stranded DNA and the T4 helicase hexamer significantly protect both the N- and the C-terminal regions of the T4 primase polypeptide chain against modification by these procedures and that this protection becomes more pronounced when the primase is assembled within the complete ternary primosome complex. Additional discrete sites of both protection and apparent hypersensitivity along the gp61 polypeptide chain have also been mapped by proteolytic footprinting reactions for the binary helicase-primase complex and in the three component primosome. These studies provide a detailed map of a number of gp61 contact positions within the primosome and reveal interactions that may be important in the structure and function of this central component of the T4 DNA replication complex.     

The Escherichia coli primosome can translocate actively in either direction along a DNA strand

The primosome is a mobile multiprotein DNA replication-priming apparatus that requires seven Escherichia coli proteins (replication factor Y (protein n'), proteins n and n", and the products of the dnaB, dnaC, dnaT, and dnaG genes) for assembly at a specific site (termed a primosome assembly site) on single-stranded DNA binding protein-coated single-stranded DNA. Two of the protein components of the primosome have intrinsic DNA helicase activity. The DNA B protein acts in the 5'----3' direction, whereas factor Y acts in the 3'----5' direction. The primosome complex has DNA helicase activity when present at a replication fork in conjunction with the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. In this report, evidence is presented that the multiprotein primosome per se can act as a DNA helicase in the absence of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. The primosome DNA helicase activity can be manifested in either direction along the DNA strand. The directionality of the primosome DNA helicase activity is modulated by the concentration and type of nucleoside triphosphate present in the reaction mixture. This DNA helicase activity requires all the preprimosomal proteins (the primosomal proteins minus the dnaG-encoded primase). Preprimosome complexes must assemble at a primosome assembly site in order to be loaded onto the single-stranded DNA and act subsequently as a DNA helicase. The 5'----3' primosome DNA helicase activity requires a 3' single-stranded tail on the fragment to be displaced, while the 3'----5' activity does not require a 5' single-stranded tail on the fragment to be displaced. Multienzyme preprimosomes moving in either direction are capable of associating with the primase to form complete primosomes that can synthesize RNA primers.     

Escherichia coli PriA helicase: fork binding orients the helicase to unwind the lagging strand side of arrested replication forks

Escherichia coli PriA is a primosome assembly protein with 3' to 5' helicase activity whose apparent function is to promote resumption of DNA synthesis following replication-fork arrest. Here, we describe how initiation of helicase activity on DNA forks is influenced by both fork structure and by single-strand DNA-binding protein. PriA could recognize and unwind forked substrates where one or both arms were primarily duplex, and PriA required a small (two bases or larger) single-stranded gap at the fork in order to initiate unwinding. The helicase was most active on substrates with a duplex lagging-strand arm and a single-stranded leading-strand arm. On this substrate, PriA was capable of translocating on either the leading or lagging strands to unwind the duplex ahead of the fork or the lagging-strand duplex, respectively. Fork-specific binding apparently orients the helicase domain to unwind the lagging-strand duplex. Binding of single-strand-binding protein to forked templates could inhibit unwinding of the duplex ahead of the fork but not unwinding of the lagging-strand duplex or translocation on the lagging-strand template. While single-strand-binding protein could inhibit binding of PriA to the minimal, unforked DNA substrates, it could not inhibit PriA binding to forked substrates. In the cell, single-strand-binding protein and fork structure may direct PriA helicase to translocate along the lagging-strand template of forked structures such that the primosome is specifically assembled on that DNA strand.     

Site-directed mutations of T4 helicase loading protein (gp59) reveal multiple modes of DNA polymerase inhibition and the mechanism of unlocking by gp41 helicase

The T4 helicase loading protein (gp59) interacts with a multitude of DNA replication proteins. In an effort to determine the functional consequences of these protein-protein interactions, point mutations were introduced into the gp59 protein. Mutations were chosen based on the available crystal structure and focused on hydrophobic residues with a high degree of solvent accessibility. Characterization of the mutant proteins revealed a single mutation, Y122A, which is defective in polymerase binding and has weakened affinity for the helicase. The interaction between single-stranded DNA-binding protein and Y122A is unaffected, as is the affinity of Y122A for DNA substrates. When standard concentrations of helicase are employed, Y122A is unable to productively load the helicase onto forked DNA substrates. As a result of the loss of polymerase binding, Y122A cannot inhibit the polymerase during nucleotide idling or prevent it from removing the primer strand of a D-loop. However, Y122A is capable of inhibiting strand displacement synthesis by polymerase. The retention of strand displacement inhibition by Y122A, even in the absence of a gp59-polymerase interaction, indicates that there are two modes of polymerase inhibition by gp59. Inhibition of the polymerase activity only requires gp59 to bind to the replication fork, whereas inhibition of the exonuclease activity requires an interaction between the polymerase and gp59. The inability of Y122A to interact with both the polymerase and the helicase suggests a mechanism for polymerase unlocking by the helicase based on a direct competition between the helicase and polymerase for an overlapping binding site on gp59.     

Helicase assembly protein Gp59 of bacteriophage T4: fluorescence anisotropy and sedimentation studies of complexes formed with derivatives of Gp32, the phage ssDNA binding protein.

The gene 59 protein (gp59) of bacteriophage T4 performs a vital function in phage DNA replication by directing the assembly of gp41, the DNA helicase component of the T4 primosome, onto lagging strand ssDNA at nascent replication forks. The helicase assembly activity of gp59 is required for optimum efficiency of helicase acquisition by the replication fork during strand displacement DNA synthesis and is essential for helicase and primosome assembly during T4 recombination-dependent DNA replication transactions. Of central importance is the ability of gp59 to load the gp41 helicase onto ssDNA previously coated with cooperatively bound molecules of gp32, the T4 ssDNA binding protein. Gp59 heteroassociations with ssDNA, gp32, and gp41 all appear to be essential for this loading reaction. Previous studies demonstrated that a tripartite complex containing gp59 and gp32 simultaneously cooccupying ssDNA is an essential intermediate in gp59-dependent helicase loading; however, the biochemical and structural parameters of gp59-gp32 complexes with or without ssDNA are currently unknown. To better understand gp59-gp32 interactions, we performed fluorescence anisotropy and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments employing native or rhodamine-labeled gp59 species in combination with altered forms of gp32, allowing us to determine their binding parameters, shape parameters, and other hydrodynamic properties. Two truncated forms of gp32 were used: gp32-B, which lacks the N-terminal B-domain required for cooperative binding to ssDNA and for stable self-association, and A-domain fragment, which is the C-terminal peptide of gp32 lacking ssDNA binding ability. Results indicate that gp59 binds with high affinity to either gp32 derivative to form a 1:1 heterodimer. In both cases, heterodimer formation is accompanied by a conformational change in gp59 which correlates with decreased gp59-DNA binding affinity. Hydrodynamic modeling suggests an asymmetric prolate ellipsoid shape for gp59, consistent with its X-ray crystallographic structure, and this asymmetry appears to increase upon binding of gp32 derivatives. Implications of our findings for the structure and function of gp59 and gp59-gp32 complexes in T4 replication are discussed.