Some experiments on the primary electron acceptor in reaction centres from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

The bacterial reaction center absorbance change at 450 nm (A-450) assigned to an anionic semiquinone, has been suggested as a candidate for the reduced form of the primary electron acceptor in bacterial photosynthesis. In reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides we have found kinetic discrepancies between the decay of A-450 and the recovery of photochemical competence. In addition, no proton uptake is measurable on the first turnover, although subsequent ones elicit one proton bound per electron. These results are taken to indicate that the acceptor reaction after a long dark period may be different for the first turnover than for subsequent ones. It is suggested that A-450 is still a likely candidate for the acceptor function but that in reaction centers, additional quinone may act as an adventitious primary acceptor when the "true" primary acceptor is reduced. Alternatively, the primary acceptor may act in a "ping-pong" fashion with respect to subsequent photoelectrons.     

Photochemical Electron Transport in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides: III. Effects of Orthophenanthroline and Other Chemicals

Reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides mediate the photochemical oxidation of cytochrome c (cyt c), and show a time-varying fluorescence of P870. Analyses of these effects indicate that the reaction centers contain a primary photochemical electron acceptor capable of holding one electron. Native or added ubiquinone (UQ) can act as a secondary electron acceptor. Orthophenanthroline (o-phen) blocks electron transfer from primary to secondary acceptors, and allows the primary acceptor to be exhibited in the foregoing experiments. Other chelators (with the possible exception of 8-hydroxyquinoline) and dichlorophenyldimethylurea (DCMU) are without apparent effect on reaction centers. o-Phen also inhibits the primary photochemical act in reaction centers; this effect is prevented by the presence of UQ. 2-n-Nonyl-4-hydroxyquinoline-N-oxide (NQNO) inhibits the primary photochemistry in reaction centers but does not affect secondary electron transfer.     

Modulation of the Primary Electron Transfer Rate in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers by Reduction of a Secondary Acceptor

Photosynthetic application of picosecond spectroscopic techniques to bacterial reaction centers has led to a much greater understanding of the chemical nature of the initial steps of photosynthesis. Within 10 ps after excitation, a charge transfer complex is formed between the primary donor, a “special pair” of bacteriochlorophyll molecules, and a transient acceptor involving bacteriopheophytin. This complex subsequently decays in about 120 ps by donating the electron to a metastable acceptor, a tightly bound quinone.

Recent experiments with conventional optical and ESR techniques have shown that when reaction centers are illuminated by a series of single turnover flashes in the presence of excess electron donors and acceptors, a stable, anionic ubisemiquinone is formed on odd flashes and destroyed on even flashes, suggesting that the acceptor region contains a second quinone that acts as a two-electron gate between the reaction center and subsequent electron transport events involving the quinone pool.

Utilizing standard picosecond techniques, we have examined the decay of the charge transfer complex in reaction centers in the presence of the stable semiquinone, formed by flash illumination with a dye laser 10 s before excitation by a picosecond pulse. In this state the decay rate for the charge transfer complex is considerably slower than when no electron is present in the quinone acceptor region. This indicates fairly strong coupling between constituents of the reaction center-quinone acceptor complex and may provide a probe into the relative positions of the various components.

     

Resistance of reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides against UV-B radiation. Effects on protein structure and electron transport

Inhibition of electron transport and damage to the protein subunits by ultraviolet-B (UV-B, 280–320 nm) radiation have been studied in isolated reaction centers of the non-sulfur purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26. UV-B irradiation results in the inhibition of charge separation as detected by the loss of the initial amplitude of absorbance change at 430 nm reflecting the formation of the P⁺(Q_AQ_B)^– state. In addition to this effect, the charge recombination accelerates and the damping of the semiquinone oscillation increases in the UV-B irradiated reaction centers. A further effect of UV-B is a 2 fold increase in the half- inhibitory concentration of o-phenanthroline. Some damage to the protein subunits of the RC is also observed as a consequence of UV-B irradiation. This effect is manifested as loss of the L, M and H subunits on Coomassie stained gels, but not accompanied with specific degradation products. The damaging effects of UV-B radiation enhanced in reaction centers where the quinone was semireduced (Q_B ^–) during UV-B irradiation, but decreased in reaction centers which lacked quinone at the Q_B binding site. In comparison with Photosystem II of green plant photosynthesis, the bacterial reaction center shows about 40 times lower sensitivity to UV-B radiation concerning the activity loss and 10 times lower sensitivity concerning the extent of reaction center protein damage. It is concluded that the main effect of UV-B radiation in the purple bacterial reaction center occurs at the Q_AQ_B quinone acceptor complex by decreasing the binding affinity of Q_B and shifting the electron equilibration from Q_AQ_B ^– to Q_A ^–Q_B. The inhibitory effect is likely to be caused by modification of the protein environment around the Q_B binding pocket and mediated by the semiquinone form of Q_B. The UV-resistance of the bacterial reaction center compared to Photosystem II indicates that either the Q_AQ_B acceptor complex, which is present in both types of reaction centers with similar structure and function, is much less susceptible to UV damage in purple bacteria, or, more likely, that Photosystem II contains UV-B targets which are more sensitive than its quinone complex.Abbreviations Bchl bacteriochlorophyll - P Bchl dimer - Q_A primary quinone electron acceptor - Q_B secondary quinone electron acceptor - RC reaction center - UV-B ultraviolet-B     

Redox potential of the non-heme iron complex in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center

In bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (bRC), the electron is transferred from the special pair (P) via accessory bacteriochlorophyll (B_A), bacteriopheopytin (H_A), the primary quinone (Q_A) to the secondary quinone (Q_B). Although the non-heme iron complex (Fe complex) is located between Q_A and Q_B, it was generally supposed not to be redox-active. Involvement of the Fe complex in electron transfer (ET) was proposed in recent FTIR studies [A. Remy and K. Gerwert, Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis, Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 (2003) 637-644]. However, other FTIR studies resulted in opposite results [J. Breton, Steady-state FTIR spectra of the photoreduction of Q_A and Q_B in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers provide evidence against the presence of a proposed transient electron acceptor X between the two quinones, Biochemistry 46 (2007) 4459-4465]. In this study, we calculated redox potentials of Q_A/B (E_m(Q_A/B)) and the Fe complex (E_m(Fe)) based on crystal structure of the wild-type bRC (WT-bRC), and we investigated the energetics of the system where the Fe complex is assumed to be involved in the ET. E_m(Fe) in WT-bRC is much less pH-dependent than that in PSII. In WT-bRC, we observed significant coupling of ET with Glu-L212 protonation upon oxidation of the Fe complex and a dramatic E_m(Fe) downshift by 230 mV upon formation of Q_A⁻ (but not Q_B⁻) due to the absence of proton uptake of Glu-L212. Changes in net charges of the His ligands of the Fe complex appear to be the nature of the redox event if we assume the involvement of the Fe complex in the ET.     

Reaction center complex from an aerobic photosynthetic bacterium,Erythrobacter species OCh 114

A photosynthetic reaction center complex has been purified from an aerobic photosynthetic bacterium, Erythrobacter species OCh 114. The reaction center was solubilized with 0.45% lauryldimethylamine N-oxide and purified by DEAE-Sephacel column chromatography. Absorption spectra of both reduced and oxidized forms of the reaction center were very similar to those of the reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26 except for the contributions due to cytochrome and carotenoid. 1 mol reaction center contained 4 mol bacteriochlorophyll a, 2 mol bacteriopheophytin a, 4 mol cytochrome c-554, 2 mol ubiquinone-10, and carotenoid. The reaction center consisted of four different polypeptides of 26, 30, 32 and 42 kDa. The last one retained heme c. Absorbance at 450 nm oscillated with the period of two on consecutive flashes. The light-minus-dark difference spectrum had two peaks at 450 nm and 420 nm, indicating that odd flashes generated a stable ubisemiquinone anion and even flashes generated quinol. o-Phenanthroline accelerated the re-reduction of flash-oxidized reaction centers, indicating that o-phenanthroline inhibited the electron transfer between Q_A and Q_B. The cytochrome (cytochrome c-554) in the reaction center was oxidized on flash activation. The midpoint potential of the primary electron acceptor (Q_A) was determined by measuring the extent of oxidation of cytochrome c-554 at various ambient potentials. The mid-point potential of Q_A was −44 mV, irrespective of pH between 5.5 and 5.9.     

Comparison of the electron spin polarized spectrum found in plant photosystem I and in iron-depleted bacterial reaction centers with time-resolved K-band EPR; evidence that the photosystem I acceptor A1 is a quinone

The suggestion that the electron acceptor A₁ in plant photosystem I (PSI) is a quinone molecule is tested by comparisons with the bacterial photosystem. The electron spin polarized (ESP) EPR signal due to the oxidized donor and reduced quinone acceptor (P ₈₇₀ ⁺ Q^-) in iron-depleted bacterial reaction centers has similar spectral characteristics as the ESP EPR signal in PSI which is believed to be due to P ₇₀₀ ⁺ A ₁ ^- , the oxidized PSI donor and reduced A₁. This is also true for better resolved spectra obtained at K-band (24 GHz). These same spectral characteristics can be simulated using a powder spectrum based on the known g-anisotropy of reduced quinones and with the same parameter set for Q^- and A₁ ^-. The best resolution of the ESP EPR signal has been obtained for deuterated PSI particles at K-band. Simulation of the A₁ ^- contribution based on g-anisotropy yields the same parameters as for bacterial Q^- (except for an overall shift in the anisotropic g-factors, which have previously been determined for Q^-). These results provide evidence that A₁ is a quinone molecule. The electron spin polarized signal of P₇₀₀ ⁺ is part of the better resolved spectrum from the deuterated PSI particles. The nature of the P₇₀₀ ⁺ ESP is not clear; however, it appears that it does not exhibit the polarization pattern required by mechanisms which have been used so far to explain the ESP in PSI.Abbreviations hf hyperfine - A₀ A₀ acceptor of photosystem I - A₁ A₁ acceptor of photosystem I - Brij-58 polyoxyethylene 20 cetyl ether - CP1 photosystem I particles which lack ferridoxin acceptors - ESP electron spin polarized - EPR electron paramagnetic resonance - I intermediary electron acceptor, bacteriopheophytin - LDAO lauryldimethylamine - N-oxide, P₇₀₀ primary electron donor of photosystem I - PSI photosystem I - P₇₀₀ ^T triplet state of primary donor of photosystem I - P₈₇₀ primary donor in R. sphaeroides reaction center - Q quinore-acceptor in photosynthetic bacteria - RC reaction center     

Dissipation in bioenergetic electron transfer chains

This paper examines the processes by which wasteful dissipation of free energy may occur in bioenergetic electron transfer chains. Frictionless transfer requires high rate constants in order to achieve a quasi-equilibrium steady-state. Previous results concerning the maximum power available from a photochemical source are recalled. The energetic performance of the bacterial reaction center is discussed, characterizing the processes that decrease either the quantum yield (recombination and obstruction) or the chemical potential (friction and non-equilibrated mechanisms). Considering the whole chain, diffusive carriers are potentially weaker links, due to kinetic limitation and short-circuiting reactions. It is suggested that the evolutionary trend has been to limit their number by lumping them into tightly bound protein complexes or, in a more flexible way, into labile supercomplexes.Abbreviations Cyt cytochrome - F Faraday - H primary acceptor in the bacterial reaction center (bacteriopheophytin) - k _B Boltzmann's constant - P primary photochemical donor (special bacteriochlorophyll pair) - RC reaction center - Q_A, Q_B primary, secondary quinone acceptor     

Electron acceptors associated with P-700 in Triton solubilized Photosystem I particles from spinach chloroplasts

Flash-induced absorption changes of Triton-solubilized Photosystem I particles from spinach were studied under reducing and/or illumination conditions that serve to alter the state of bound electron acceptors. By monitoring the decay of P-700 following each of a train of flashes, we found that P-430 or components resembling it can hold 2 equivalents of electrons transferred upon successive illuminations. This requires the presence of a good electron donor, reduced phenazine methosulfate or neutral red, otherwise the back reaction of P-700⁺ with P-430 occurs in about 30 ms. If the two P-430 sites, designated Centers A and B, are first reduced by preilluminating flashes or chemically by dithionite under anaerobic conditions, then subsequent laser flashes generate a 250 μs back reaction of P-700⁺, which we associate with a more primary electron acceptor A₂. In turn, when A₂ is reduced by background (continuous) illumination in presence of neutral red and under strongly reducing conditions, laser flashes then produce a much faster (3 μs) back reaction at wavelengths characteristic of P-700. We associate this with another more primary electron acceptor, A₁, which functions very close to P-700. The organization of these components probably corresponds to the sequence $\text{P-700-}\text{A}{}_1\text{-}\text{A}{}_2\text{-P-430[}\text{A}\text{B}\text{]}$. The relation of the optical components to acceptor species detected by EPR, by electron-spin polarization or in terms of peptide components of Photosystem I is discussed.Preliminary experiments with broken chloroplasts suggest that an analogous situation occurs there, as well.     

Electron-spin resonance studies of the bound iron-sulfur centers in Photosystem I II. Correlation of P-700 triplet production with urea/ferricyanide inactivation of the iron-sulfur clusters

Photosystem I charge separation in a subchloroplast particle isolated from spinach was investigated by electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy following graduated inactivation of the bound iron-sulfur centers by urea-ferricyanide treatment. Previous work demonstrated a differential decrease in iron-sulfur centers A, B and X which indicated that center X serves as a branch point for parallel electron flow through centers A and B (Golbeck, J.H. and Warden, J.T. (1982) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 681, 77–84). We now show that during inactivation the disappearance of iron-sulfur centers A, B, and X correlates with the appearance of a spin-polarized triplet ESR signal with |D| = 279·10⁻⁴ cm⁻¹ and |E| = 39·10⁻⁴ cm⁻¹. The triplet resonances titrate with a midpoint potential of +380 ± 10 mV. Illumination of the inactivated particles results in the generation of an asymmetric ESR signal with g = 2.0031 and ΔH_pp = 1.0 mT. Deconvolution of the P-700⁺ contribution to this composite resonance reveals the spectrum of the putative primary acceptor species, A₀, which is characterized by g = 2.0033 ± 0.0004 and ΔH_pp = 1.0 ± 0.2 mT. The data presented in this report do not substantiate the participation of the electron acceptor A₁ in PS I electron transport, following destruction of the iron-sulfur cluster corresponding to center X. We suggest that A₁ is closely associated with center X and that this component is decoupled from the electron-transport path upon destruction of center X. The inability to photoreduce A₁ in reaction centers lacking a functional center X may result from alteration of the reaction center tertiary structure by the urea-ferricyanide treatment or from displacement of A₁ from its binding site.     

Photosystem II heterogeneity: the acceptor side

It is well known that two photosystems, I and II, are needed to transfer electrons from H₂O to NADP⁺ in oxygenic photosynthesis. Each photosystem consists of several components: (a) the light-harvesting antenna (L-HA) system, (b) the reaction center (RC) complex, and (c) the polypeptides and other co-factors involved in electron and proton transport. First, we present a mini review on the heterogeneity which has been identified with the electron acceptor side of Photosystem II (PS II) including (a) L-HA system: the PS II and PS II units, (b) RC complex containing electron acceptor Q₁ or Q₂; and (c) electron acceptor complex: Q_A (having two different redox potentials Q_L and Q_H) and Q_B (Q_B-type; Q'_B type; and non-Q_B type); additional components such as iron (Q-400), U (E_m,7=–450 mV) and Q-318 (or Aq) are also mentioned. Furthermore, we summarize the current ideas on the so-called inactive (those that transfer electrons to the plastoquinone pool rather slowly) and active reaction centers. Second, we discuss the bearing of the first section on the ratio of the PS II reaction center (RC-II) and the PS I reaction center (RC-I). Third, we review recent results that relate the inactive and active RC-II, obtained by the use of quinones DMQ and DCBQ, with the fluorescence transient at room temperature and in heated spinach and soybean thylakoids. These data show that inactive RC-II can be easily monitored by the OID phase of fluorescence transient and that heating converts active into inactive centers.Abbreviations DCBQ 2,5 or 2,6 dichloro-p-benzoquinone - DMQ dimethylquinone - Q_A primary plastoquinone electron acceptor of photosystem II - Q_B secondary plastoquinone electron acceptor of photosystem II - IODP successive fluorescence levels during time course of chlorophyll a fluorescence: O for origin, I for inflection, D for dip or plateau, and P for peak     

Oxygen activation by isolated chloroplasts from Euglena gracilis. Ferredoxin-dependent function of a fluorescent compound and photosynthetic electron transport close to photosystem.

Oxygen reduction by isolated chloroplast lamellae from spinach, yielding the superoxide free radical in the light, is stimulated by a fluorescent factor (“compound No. 4”, isolated from Euglena gracilis strain Z) in a ferredoxin-dependent reaction. This reaction is not observed with Euglena chloroplasts, although there is a stimulation by compound No. 4 of ferredoxin-dependent oxygen reduction at the expense of NADPH + H⁺ as electron donor in the dark. Evidence is provided that in Euglena chloroplasts in the absence of NADP as electron acceptor a cyclic electron transport is predominating, including photosystem I, ferredoxin, NADP-ferredoxin reductase, and cytochrome₅₅₂. Isolated spinach chloroplast lamellae show a similar “cyclic” electron transport after treatment with digitonin, depending on the addition of the above cofactors. This result might indicate that Euglena chloroplast lamellae show this cyclic electron transport only as an artifact due to the isolation procedure. The results furthermore indicate that the pteridine-like, fluorescent compound No. 4 is not active as the primary electron acceptor of photosystem I; it may however be involved in oxygen activation by Euglena gracilis chloroplasts.     

An alternative pathway of light-induced transmembrane electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Rhodobacter sphaeroides</Emphasis>

In the absorption spectrum of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers, a minor absorption band was found with a maximum at 1053 nm. The amplitude of this band is ~10,000 times less and its half-width is comparable to that of the long-wavelength absorption band of the primary electron donor P₈₇₀. When the primary electron donor is excited by femtosecond light pulses at 870 nm, the absorption band at 1053 nm is increased manifold during the earliest stages of charge separation. The growth of this absorption band in difference absorption spectra precedes the appearance of stimulated emission at 935 nm and the appearance of the absorption band of anion-radical B_A ^– at 1020 nm, reported earlier by several researchers. When reaction centers are illuminated with 1064 nm light, the absorption spectrum undergoes changes indicating reduction of the primary electron acceptor Q_A, with the primary electron donor P₈₇₀ remaining neutral. These photoinduced absorption changes reflect the formation of the long-lived radical state PB_AH_AQ_A ^–.     

Effect of hydrogen bonds on the energetics of macromolecules in the course of electron transfer

For a model system consisting of a bacteriochlorophyll dimer (P) and a primary quinone with the nearest environment (Q_A), which are the electron donor and acceptor in the recombination reaction in the Rhodobacter spheroides reaction center, the energies of states P⁺Q _A ^? and PQ_A have been calculated at several stable conformations of Q_A that differ in the positions of the proton involved in the hydrogen bond. It is shown that the position of the proton has a considerable influence on the energy of vertical transition P⁺Q _A ^? → PQ_A.     

Light saturation curves show competence of the water splitting complex in inactive Photosystem II reaction centers

Photosystem II complexes of higher plants are structurally and functionally heterogeneous. While the only clearly defined structural difference is that Photosystem II reaction centers are served by two distinct antenna sizes, several types of functional heterogeneity have been demonstrated. Among these is the observation that in dark-adapted leaves of spinach and pea, over 30% of the Photosystem II reaction centers are unable to reduce plastoquinone to plastoquinol at physiologically meaningful rates. Several lines of evidence show that the impaired reaction centers are effectively inactive, because the rate of oxidation of the primary quinone acceptor, Q_A, is 1000 times slower than in normally active reaction centers. However, there are conflicting opinions and data over whether inactive Photosystem II complexes are capable of oxidizing water in the presence of certain artificial electron acceptors. In the present study we investigated whether inactive Photosystem II complexes have a functional water oxidizing system in spinach thylakoid membranes by measuring the flash yield of water oxidation products as a function of flash intensity. At low flash energies (less that 10% saturation), selected to minimize double turnovers of reaction centers, we found that in the presence of the artificial quinone acceptor, dichlorobenzoquinone (DCBQ), the yield of proton release was enhanced 20±2% over that observed in the presence of dimethylbenzoquinone (DMBQ). We argue that the extra proton release is from the normally inactive Photosystem II reaction centers that have been activated in the presence of DCBQ, demonstrating their capacity to oxidize water in repetitive flashes, as concluded by Graan and Ort (Biochim Biophys Acta (1986) 852: 320–330). The light saturation curves indicate that the effective antenna size of inactive reaction centers is 55±12% the size of active Photosystem II centers. Comparison of the light saturation dependence of steady state oxygen evolution in the presence of DCBQ or DMBQ support the conclusion that inactive Photosystem II complexes have a functional water oxidation system.Abbreviations DCBQ 2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone - DMBQ 2,5-dimethyl-p-benzoquinone - F_o initial fluorescence level using dark-adapted thylakoids - Inactive reaction centers reaction centers inactive in plastoquinone reduction - PS II Photosystem II - Q_A primary quinone acceptor of Photosystem II - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor of Photosystem II Department of Plant Biology, University of IllinoisDepartment of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Illinois     

Effect of inhibitors,redox state and isoprenoid chain length on the affinity of ubiquinone for the secondary acceptor binding site in the reaction centers of photosynthetic bacteria

Quinone and inhibitor binding to Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides (R-26 and GA) reaction centers were studied using spectroscopic methods and by direct adsorption of reaction centers onto anion exchange filters in the presence of ¹⁴C-labelled quinone or inhibitor. These measurements show that as secondary acceptor, Q_B, ubiquinone (UQ) is tightly bound in the semiquinone form and loosely bound in the quinone and quinol forms. The quinol is probably more loosely bound than the quinone. o-Phenanthroline and terbutryn, a triazine inhibitor, compete with UQ and with each other for binding to the reaction center. Inhibition by o-phenanthroline of electron transfer from the primary to the secondary quinone acceptor (Q_A to Q_B) occurs via displacement of UQ from the Q_B binding site. Displacement of UQ by terbutryn is apparently accessory to the inhibition of electron transfer. Terbutryn binding is lowered by reduction of Q_B to Q^?_B but is practically unaffected by reduction of Q_A to Q^?_A in the absence of Q_B. UQ-9 and UQ-10 have a 5- to 6-fold higher binding affinity to the Q_B site than does UQ-1, indicating that the long isoprenoid chain facilitates the binding to the Q_B site.     

Photochemical Electron Transport in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides: II. Interaction with external Electron Donors and Acceptors and a Reevaluation of Some Spectroscopic Data

Photochemical reaction centers prepared from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides were treated with reduced cytochrome c (cyt c), and in some cases with ubiquinone (UQ), and illuminated. The light-induced oxidation of cy and reduction of UQ were observed, and also the variations in fluorescence of P870. These observations indicated that each reaction center contains a primary photochemical electron acceptor capable of holding just one electron. Depending on the method of preparation, the reaction centers may also contain secondary electron acceptor pools consisting mainly of UQ. The role of native UQ as an electron acceptor could be duplicated by added UQ. The yield of P870 fluorescence increased by a factor of 3-4, at most, during illumination of reaction centers in the presence of an electron donor such as reduced cyt. This suggests that the quantum efficiency for the primary photoact is about 0.7, rather than 0.9-1.0 as concluded in the past from optical absorption measurements. The apparent quantum efficiency for the oxidation of cyt by illuminated reaction centers can be increased by the addition of UQ and is decreased at higher concentrations of the detergent lauryl dimethylamine oxide (LDAO). These treatments do not affect the quantum efficiency of P870 oxidation, measured in the absence of cyt.     

Electron acceptors of photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers. Direct observation of oscillatory behaviour suggesting two closely equivalent ubiquinones.

When reaction centers are illuminated by a series of single turnover flashes ubisemiquinone is formed and destroyed on alternate flashes. This oscillatory behaviour can be observed with both optical and electron spin resonance techniques. The oscillations are dependent upon the presence of excess ubiquinone in a manner which suggests that two molecules may act almost equivalently as metastable primary acceptors forming a two-electron gate between the one-electron primary photoact and a two-electron secondary acceptor pool.     

Electron acceptors of photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers. Direct observation of oscillatory behaviour suggesting two closely equivalent ubiquinones

When reaction centers are illuminated by a series of single turnover flashes ubisemiquinone is formed and destroyed on alternate flashes. This oscillatory behaviour can be observed with both optical and electron spin resonance techniques. The oscillations are dependent upon the presence of excess ubiquinone in a manner which suggests that two molecules may act almost equivalently as metastable primary acceptors forming a two-electron gate between the one-electron primary photoact and a two-electron secondary acceptor pool.