Genetic evidence for interaction between components of the yeast 26S proteasome: combination of a mutation in RPN12 (a lid component gene) with mutations in RPT1 (an ATPase gene) causes synthetic lethality

The 19S regulatory particle of the yeast 26S proteasome consists of six related ATPases (Rpt proteins) and at least 11 non-ATPase proteins (Rpn proteins). RPN12 (formerly NIN1) encodes an Rpn component of the 19S regulatory particle and is essential for growth. To determine which subunit(s) of the 26S proteasome interact(s) with Rpn12, we attempted to screen for mutations that cause synthetic lethality in the presence of the rpn12-1 (formerly nin1-1) mutation. Among the candidates recovered was a new allele of RPT1 (formerly CIM5). This mutant allele was designated rpt1-2; on its own this mutation caused no phenotypic change, whereas the rpn12-1 rpt1-2 double mutant was lethal, suggesting a strong interaction between Rpn12 and Rpt1. The site of the rpt1-2 mutation was determined by DNA sequencing of the RPT1 locus retrieved from the mutant, and a single nucleotide alteration was found. This changes amino acid 446 of the RPT1 product from alanine to valine. The alanine residue is conserved in all Rpt proteins, except Rpt5, but no function has yet been assigned to the region that contains it. We propose that this region is necessary for Rpt1 to interact with Rpn12. The terminal phenotype of the rpn12-1 rpt1-2 double mutant was not cell cycle specific, suggesting that in the double mutant cells the function of the 26S proteasome is completely eliminated, thereby inducing multiple defects in cellular functions.     

The RPT2 subunit of the 26S proteasome directs complex assembly, histone dynamics, and gametophyte and sporophyte development in Arabidopsis

The regulatory particle (RP) of the 26S proteasome contains a heterohexameric ring of AAA-ATPases (RPT1-6) that unfolds and inserts substrates into the core protease (CP) for degradation. Through genetic analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana gene pair encoding RPT2, we show that this subunit plays a critical role in 26S proteasome assembly, histone dynamics, and plant development. rpt2a rpt2b double null mutants are blocked in both male and female gamete transmission, demonstrating that the subunit is essential. Whereas rpt2b mutants are phenotypically normal, rpt2a mutants display a range of defects, including impaired leaf, root, trichome, and pollen development, delayed flowering, stem fasciation, hypersensitivity to mitomycin C and amino acid analogs, hyposensitivity to the proteasome inhibitor MG132, and decreased 26S complex stability. The rpt2a phenotype can be rescued by both RPT2a and RPT2b, indicative of functional redundancy, but not by RPT2a mutants altered in ATP binding/hydrolysis or missing the C-terminal hydrophobic sequence that docks the RPT ring onto the CP. Many rpt2a phenotypes are shared with mutants lacking the chromatin assembly factor complex CAF1. Like caf1 mutants, plants missing RPT2a or reduced in other RP subunits contain less histones, thus implicating RPT2 specifically, and the 26S proteasome generally, in plant nucleosome assembly.     

Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome.

A family of ATPases resides within the regulatory particle of the proteasome. These proteins (Rpt1-Rpt6) have been proposed to mediate substrate unfolding, which may be required for translocation of substrates through the channel that leads from the regulatory particle into the proteolytic core particle. To analyze the role of ATP hydrolysis in protein breakdown at the level of the individual ATPase, we have introduced equivalent site-directed mutations into the ATPbinding motif of each RPT gene. Non-conservative substitutions of the active-site lysine were lethal in four of six cases, and conferred a strong growth defect in two cases. Thus, the ATPases are not functionally redundant, despite their multiplicity and sequence similarity. Degradation of a specific substrate can be inhibited by ATP-binding-site substitutions in many of the Rpt proteins, indicating that they co-operate in the degradation of individual substrates. The phenotypic defects of the different rpt mutants were strikingly varied. The most divergent phenotype was that of the rpt1 mutant, which was strongly growth defective despite showing no general defect in protein turnover. In addition, rpt1 was unique among the rpt mutants in displaying a G1 cell-cycle defect. Proteasomes purified from an rpt2 mutant showed a dramatic inhibition of peptidase activity, suggesting a defect in gating of the proteasome channel. In summary, ATP promotes protein breakdown by the proteasome through multiple mechanisms, as reflected by the diverse phenotypes of the rpt mutants.     

Genetic evidence for interaction between components of the yeast 26S proteasome: combination of a mutation in RPN12 (a lid component gene) with mutations in RPT1 (an ATPase gene) causes synthetic lethality

The 19S regulatory particle of the yeast 26S proteasome consists of six related ATPases (Rpt proteins) and at least 11 non-ATPase proteins (Rpn proteins). RPN12 (formerly NIN1) encodes an Rpn component of the 19S regulatory particle and is essential for growth. To determine which subunit(s) of the 26S proteasome interact(s) with Rpn12, we attempted to screen for mutations that cause synthetic lethality in the presence of the rpn12-1 (formerly nin1-1) mutation. Among the candidates recovered was a new allele of RPT1 (formerly CIM5). This mutant allele was designated rpt1-2; on its own this mutation caused no phenotypic change, whereas the rpn12-1 rpt1-2 double mutant was lethal, suggesting a strong interaction between Rpn12 and Rpt1. The site of the rpt1-2 mutation was determined by DNA sequencing of the RPT1 locus retrieved from the mutant, and a single nucleotide alteration was found. This changes amino acid 446 of the RPT1 product from alanine to valine. The alanine residue is conserved in all Rpt proteins, except Rpt5, but no function has yet been assigned to the region that contains it. We propose that this region is necessary for Rpt1 to interact with Rpn12. The terminal phenotype of the rpn12-1 rpt1-2 double mutant was not cell cycle specific, suggesting that in the double mutant cells the function of the 26S proteasome is completely eliminated, thereby inducing multiple defects in cellular functions. Received: 1 February 1999 / Accepted: 5 May 1999     

Arabidopsis RPT2a encoding the 26S proteasome subunit is required for various aspects of root meristem maintenance, and regulates gametogenesis redundantly with its homolog, RPT2b

The 26S proteasome plays fundamental roles in the degradation of short-lived regulatory proteins, thereby controlling diverse cellular processes. In Arabidopsis, the essential RPT2 subunit is encoded by two highly homologous genes: RPT2a and RPT2b. Currently, only RPT2a has been reported to regulate various developmental processes, including the maintenance of the root apical meristem (RAM), although the roles of RPT2a in the RAM are still obscure. Here, we analyzed the cell type-specific requirement for RPT2a. When RPT2a was expressed locally in the rpt2a mutant, pleiotropic defects in the RAM, such as cell death and distorted cellular organization, were rescued differently, suggesting that RPT2a regulates various specific activities, which converge to maintain the RAM. On the other hand, the homologous RPT2b was also expressed in meristems, and the expression of RPT2b protein under the control of the RPT2a promoter complemented the rpt2a RAM defects, although the rpt2b mutant showed no obvious defect in all developmental aspects we examined. These results show that RPT2b might work in the RAM, but is dispensable for RAM maintenance in the presence of RPT2a. In contrast, the rpt2a rpt2b double mutant was lethal in male and female gametophytes, suggesting that RPT2a and RPT2b are redundantly required for gametogenesis. Furthermore, we showed that similar meristematic and gametophytic defects were caused by mutations in other subunit genes, RPT5a and RPT5b, suggesting that proper activity of the proteasome, not an RPT2-specific function, is required. Taken together, our results suggest that RPT2a and RPT2b contribute differently to the proteasome activity required for each developmental context.     

A proteasomal ATPase contributes to dislocation of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) substrates

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) eliminates aberrant proteins from the ER by dislocating them to the cytoplasm where they are tagged by ubiquitin and degraded by the proteasome. Six distinct AAA-ATPases (Rpt1-6) at the base of the 19S regulatory particle of the 26S proteasome recognize, unfold, and translocate substrates into the 20S catalytic chamber. Here we show unique contributions of individual Rpts to ERAD by employing equivalent conservative substitutions of the invariant lysine in the ATP-binding motif of each Rpt subunit. ERAD of two substrates, luminal CPY*-HA and membrane 6myc-Hmg2, is inhibited only in rpt4R and rpt2RF mutants. Conversely, in vivo degradation of a cytosolic substrate, DeltassCPY*-GFP, as well as in vitro cleavage of Suc-LLVY-AMC are hardly affected in rpt4R mutant yet are inhibited in rpt2RF mutant. Together, we find that equivalent mutations in RPT4 and RPT2 result in different phenotypes. The Rpt4 mutation is manifested in ERAD defects, whereas the Rpt2 mutation is manifested downstream, in global proteasomal activity. Accordingly, rpt4R strain is particularly sensitive to ER stress and exhibits an activated unfolded protein response, whereas rpt2RF strain is sensitive to general stress. Further characterization of Rpt4 involvement in ERAD reveals that it participates in CPY*-HA dislocation, a function previously attributed to p97/Cdc48, another AAA-ATPase essential for ERAD of CPY*-HA but dispensable for proteasomal degradation of DeltassCPY*-GFP. Pointing to Cdc48 and Rpt4 overlapping functions, excess Cdc48 partially restores impaired ERAD in rpt4R, but not in rpt2RF. We discuss models for Cdc48 and Rpt4 cooperation in ERAD.     

Functional asymmetries of proteasome translocase pore

Degradation by proteasomes involves coupled translocation and unfolding of its protein substrates. Six distinct but paralogous proteasome ATPase proteins, Rpt1 to -6, form a heterohexameric ring that acts on substrates. An axially positioned loop (Ar-Φ loop) moves in concert with ATP hydrolysis, engages substrate, and propels it into a proteolytic chamber. The aromatic (Ar) residue of the Ar-Φ loop in all six Rpts of S. cerevisiae is tyrosine; this amino acid is thought to have important functional contacts with substrate. Six yeast strains were constructed and characterized in which Tyr was individually mutated to Ala. The mutant cells were viable and had distinct phenotypes. rpt3, rpt4, and rpt5 Tyr/Ala mutants, which cluster on one side of the ATPase hexamer, were substantially impaired in their capacity to degrade substrates. In contrast, rpt1, rpt2, and rpt6 mutants equaled or exceeded wild type in degradation activity. However, rpt1 and rpt6 mutants had defects that limited cell growth or viability under conditions that stressed the ubiquitin proteasome system. In contrast, the rpt3 mutant grew faster than wild type and to a smaller size, a defect that has previously been associated with misregulation of G1 cyclins. This rpt3 phenotype probably results from altered degradation of cell cycle regulatory proteins. Finally, mutation of five of the Rpt subunits increased proteasome ATPase activity, implying bidirectional coupling between the Ar-Φ loop and the ATP hydrolysis site. The present observations assign specific functions to individual Rpt proteins and provide insights into the diverse roles of the axial loops of individual proteasome ATPases.     

Control of endoreduplication of trichome by RPT2a, a subunit of the 19S proteasome in Arabidopsis

The ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway plays a central role in the degradation of short-lived regulatory proteins to control many cellular events. The Arabidopsis knockout mutant rpt2a, which contains a defect in the AtRPT2a subunit of the 26S proteasome regulatory particle, showed enlarged leaves caused by increased cell size that correlated with increased ploidy caused by extended endoreduplication. To clarify the role of RPT2a in endoreduplication control, trichome development was genetically examined in further detail. RHL1 and GL3 encode proteins that have a role in the positive regulation of endocycle progression in trichomes. The rhl1 mutants are stalled at 8C and have trichomes with only a single branch. The rpt2a mutation did not alter the rhl1 mutant phenotype, and trichomes of double rpt2a rhl1 mutants resembled that of single rhl1 mutants. On the other hand, the rpt2a mutation suppressed the gl3 phenotype (stalled at 16C, two trichome branches), and trichomes of the double rpt2a gl3 mutant resembled those of the wild type (WT) plants. Together, these data suggest that RPT2a functions to negatively regulate endocycle progression following completion of the third endoreduplication step mediated by RHL1 (8C–16C).     

UFD4 lacking the proteasome-binding region catalyses ubiquitination but is impaired in proteolysis

The ubiquitin system recognizes degradation signals of protein substrates through E3-E2 ubiquitin ligases, which produce a substrate-linked multi-ubiquitin chain. Ubiquitinated substrates are degraded by the 26S proteasome, which consists of the 20S protease and two 19S particles. We previously showed that UBR1 and UFD4, two E3 ligases of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, interact with specific proteasomal subunits. Here we advance this analysis for UFD4 and show that it interacts with RPT4 and RPT6, two subunits of the 19S particle. The 201-residue amino-terminal region of UFD4 is essential for its binding to RPT4 and RPT6. UFD4(DeltaN), which lacks this N-terminal region, adds ubiquitin to test substrates with apparently wild-type activity, but is impaired in conferring short half-lives on these substrates. We propose that interaction of a targeted substrate with the 26S proteasome involves contacts of specific proteasomal subunits with the substrate-bound ubiquitin ligase, with the substrate-linked multi-ubiquitin chain and with the substrate itself. This multiple-site binding may function to slow down dissociation of the substrate from the proteasome and to facilitate the unfolding of substrate through ATP-dependent movements of the chaperone subunits of the 19S particle.     

A SNP associated with alternative splicing of RPT5b causes unequal redundancy between RPT5a and RPT5b among Arabidopsis thaliana natural variation

Background  

The proteasome subunit RPT5, which is essential for gametophyte development, is encoded by two genes in Arabidopsis thaliana; RPT5a and RPT5b. We showed previously that RPT5a and RPT5b are fully redundant in the Columbia (Col-0) accession, whereas in the Wassilewskia accession (Ws-4), RPT5b does not complement the effect of a strong rpt5a mutation in the male gametophyte, and only partially complements rpt5a mutation in the sporophyte. RPT5b ^Col-0 and RPT5b ^Ws-4 differ by only two SNPs, one located in the promoter and the other in the seventh intron of the gene.     

Induction of M-phase arrest and apoptosis after HIV-1 Vpr expression through uncoupling of nuclear and centrosomal cycle in HeLa cells

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) accessory protein Vpr induces cell cycle arrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle followed by apoptosis. The mechanism of the arrest is unknown but the arrest is believed to facilitate viral replication. In the present study, we have established cell lines that allow conditional expression of Vpr, and have examined the mechanism of cell death following Vpr expression. We found that cells expressing Vpr enter M phase after long G2 arrest but formed aberrant multipolar spindles that were incapable of completing karyokinesis or cytokinesis. This abnormality provided the basis for apoptosis, which always followed in these cells. The multipolar spindles formed in response to abnormal centrosomal duplication that occurred during the G2 arrest but did not occur in cells arrested in G2 by irradiation. Thus, the expression of Vpr appears to be responsible for abnormal centrosome duplication, which in turn contributes in part to the rapid cell death following HIV-1 infection.     

Genetic studies with the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe suggest involvement of wee1, ppa2, and rad24 in induction of cell cycle arrest by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr

Accessory protein Vpr of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) arrests cell cycling at G(2)/M phase in human and simian cells. Recently, it has been shown that Vpr also causes cell cycle arrest in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which shares the cell cycle regulatory mechanisms with higher eukaryotes including humans. In this study, in order to identify host cellular factors involved in Vpr-induced cell cycle arrest, the ability of Vpr to cause elongated cellular morphology (cdc phenotype) typical of G(2)/M cell cycle arrest in wild-type and various mutant strains of S. pombe was examined. Our results indicated that Vpr caused the cdc phenotype in wild-type S. pombe as well as in strains carrying mutations, such as the cdc2-3w, Deltacdc25, rad1-1, Deltachk1, Deltamik1, and Deltappa1 strains. However, other mutants, such as the cdc2-1w, Deltawee1, Deltappa2, and Deltarad24 strains, failed to show a distinct cdc phenotype in response to Vpr expression. Results of these genetic studies suggested that Wee1, Ppa2, and Rad24 might be required for induction of cell cycle arrest by HIV-1 Vpr. Cell proliferation was inhibited by Vpr expression in all of the strains examined including the ones that did not show the cdc phenotype. The results supported the previously suggested possibility that Vpr affects the cell cycle and cell proliferation through different pathways.     

Functional Characterization of Rpn3 Uncovers a Distinct 19S Proteasomal Subunit Requirement for Ubiquitin-Dependent Proteolysis of Cell Cycle Regulatory Proteins in Budding Yeast

By selectively eliminating ubiquitin-conjugated proteins, the 26S proteasome plays a pivotal role in a large variety of cellular regulatory processes, particularly in the control of cell cycle transitions. Access of ubiquitinated substrates to the inner catalytic chamber within the 20S core particle is mediated by the 19S regulatory particle (RP), whose subunit composition in budding yeast has been recently elucidated. In this study, we have investigated the cell cycle defects resulting from conditional inactivation of one of these RP components, the essential non-ATPase Rpn3/Sun2 subunit. Using temperature-sensitive mutant alleles, we show that rpn3 mutations do not prevent the G(1)/S transition but cause a metaphase arrest, indicating that the essential Rpn3 function is limiting for mitosis. rpn3 mutants appear severely compromised in the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of several physiologically important proteasome substrates. Thus, RPN3 function is required for the degradation of the G(1)-phase cyclin Cln2 targeted by SCF; the S-phase cyclin Clb5, whose ubiquitination is likely to involve a combination of E3 (ubiquitin protein ligase) enzymes; and anaphase-promoting complex targets, such as the B-type cyclin Clb2 and the anaphase inhibitor Pds1. Our results indicate that the Pds1 degradation defect of the rpn3 mutants most likely accounts for the metaphase arrest phenotype observed. Surprisingly, but consistent with the lack of a G(1) arrest phenotype in thermosensitive rpn3 strains, the Cdk inhibitor Sic1 exhibits a short half-life regardless of the RPN3 genotype. In striking contrast, Sic1 turnover is severely impaired by a temperature-sensitive mutation in RPN12/NIN1, encoding another essential RP subunit. While other interpretations are possible, these data strongly argue for the requirement of distinct RP subunits for efficient proteolysis of specific cell cycle regulators. The potential implications of these data are discussed in the context of possible Rpn3 function in multiubiquitin-protein conjugate recognition by the 19S proteasomal regulatory particle.     

The Role of Vpr in HIV-1 Disease Progression is Independent of Its G2 Arrest Induction Function

Vpr (viral protein R) is a vital HIV-1 accessory protein with multiple functions in the viral life cycle, including nuclear import of preintegration complex, induction of apoptosis and G2 cell cycle arrest. The cell cycle perturbation activity of Vpr requires activation of the ATR (Ataxia-Telangiectasia and Rad3-related) pathway and the integrity of Vpr C-terminal motif that is crucial for chromatin binding. Recent studies also demonstrated Vpr as one of the viral factors that influence HIV disease progression, as mutations in Vpr were overrepresented in some cohorts of long-term nonprogressors (LTNP). The LTNP-associated mutations of Vpr are frequently observed in the C-terminal domain. This raises the question whether the LTNP phenotype of Vpr is the result of the loss its ability to induce G2 arrest. Here we report that the LTNP-associated mutants of Vpr function normally in the induction of G2 arrest. No defects in ATR activation and direct binding to chromatin are observed. These mutants also show similar levels of apoptosis induction as wild-type Vpr. These data differentiate the LTNP-associated mutations of Vpr with those defective in inducing G2 arrest. We propose that the G2 arrest function of Vpr is separated from the LTNP phenotype, and the role of Vpr in HIV disease progression may involve other functions of Vpr.     

Proteasome mutants, pre4-2 and ump1-2, suppress the essential function but not the mitochondrial RNase P function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene RPM2

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae nuclear gene RPM2 encodes a component of the mitochondrial tRNA-processing enzyme RNase P. Cells grown on fermentable carbon sources do not require mitochondrial tRNA processing activity, but still require RPM2, indicating an additional function for the Rpm2 protein. RPM2-null cells arrest after 25 generations on fermentable media. Spontaneous mutations that suppress arrest occur with a frequency of approximately 9 x 10(-6). The resultant mutants do not grow on nonfermentable carbon sources. We identified two loci responsible for this suppression, which encode proteins that influence proteasome function or assembly. PRE4 is an essential gene encoding the beta-7 subunit of the 20S proteasome core. A Val-to-Phe substitution within a highly conserved region of Pre4p that disrupts proteasome function suppresses the growth arrest of RPM2-null cells on fermentable media. The other locus, UMP1, encodes a chaperone involved in 20S proteasome assembly. A nonsense mutation in UMP1 also disrupts proteasome function and suppresses Deltarpm2 growth arrest. In an RPM2 wild-type background, pre4-2 and ump1-2 strains fail to grow at restrictive temperatures on nonfermentable carbon sources. These data link proteasome activity with Rpm2p and mitochondrial function.