Summary of the diverse situation of similar biotherapeutic products in the selected countries (August 2010)

The WHO guidelines on evaluating similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) were adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in 2009. The fundamental messages of the guidelines are that a) generic approach is not suitable for licensing SBPs, b) only products that have been subjected to a comparability exercise and show similarity to the reference biotherapeutic product (RBP) in terms of their quality, safety and efficacy are defined as SBPs, and c) the products that are not shown to be similar to the originator products as indicated in the guidelines should neither be described as "similar" nor called SBPs. In view of these, the products which have not been subjected to a head to head comparison with the RBP should be referred to as another term, e.g. 'non-innovator' therapeutic products. In order to review the current situation in each country, a survey was planned in line with the implementation workshop of the guidelines in August 2010. The results show that the diversity of regulatory framework for licensing SBPs and the ambiguous use of the terms, 'similar' or 'generic', present considerable challenges for the future use of SBPs.     

WHO informal consultation on regulatory evaluation of therapeutic biological medicinal products held at WHO Headquarters, Geneva, 19-20 April 2007.

This report reflects the discussion and conclusions of an informal consultation held on 19-20 April 2007 at the World Health Organization concerning the regulatory evaluation of therapeutic biological medicinal products. The objectives of this meeting were to discuss the current status of so-called "similar" biological medicinal products (biosimilars) and to review regulatory pathways and challenges in evaluating the quality, safety and efficacy of these products. Biosimilars are products that are subject to licensing with a reduced data package due to a proven 'similarity' to the licensed reference product. The meeting was attended by experts in biotherapeutics from regulatory agencies, industry and academia representing 16 countries worldwide. Dr. Elwyn Griffiths (Canada) acted as Chairman and Dr. James Robertson (UK) was the Rapporteur. The meeting strongly focused on the usage of biosimilars and the current regulatory situation in many different countries. The application of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) to biosimilars, their potential immunogenicity, and WHO international standards and reference materials were also discussed, alongside presentations from the innovator and generic manufacturing industries. The consultation recognized the importance of the terminology as well as a definition of biosimilars for future considerations of these products. However, achieving a global consensus on the terminology for these new challenging products was not attempted at the Consultation, and it was decided that a future WHO working group should act on this issue as a next step. For purposes of this meeting report only, the term 'biosimilars' is temporarily used to refer to this category of products. It became clear that biotherapeutics authorized on the basis of a reduced data package are available and being used in some countries, with more appearing on the market. The existence of divergent approaches to the regulatory oversight of biosimilars in different countries revealed a need for defining regulatory expectations for these products at the global level. While many countries are following the guideline developed within the EU for quality aspects, discrepancies remain regarding the non-clinical and clinical studies of these products. The Consultation recommended that the WHO should develop a guideline in this area in order to provide a framework for the development of regulatory pathways for these products worldwide. For this purpose, agreement on the scope, definition and terminology of these products was deemed necessary. The interchangeability and substitution of products were also flagged as areas in need of harmonization. A WHO working group should be established to develop a guideline that would promote global consensus on the regulation of biosimilars, assist in their registration and enhance the availability of safe and effective biosimilar products worldwide.     

Tackling Quantitation: A Report on the Annual Spring Workshop of the HUPO‐PSI 28–30 March 2010, Seoul,South Korea

The annual Spring Workshop of the HUPO‐PSI took place in Korea, where the Mass Spectrometry and Protein Separations groups joined forces to tackle the issue of the consistent reporting of quantitative proteomic data generated by mass‐spectrometry‐based technologies. A preliminary mzQuantML schema was drafted which, when completed and tested, will complement the existing mzIdentML schema for reporting protein identifications. The Molecular Interactions group concentrated on the implementations of the PSICQUIC (PSI Common Query InterfaCe) service that allows users to simultaneously query interaction data across multiple participating resources. Work was also undertaken to update the MIAPE guidelines, in response to feedback from the editors of a number of proteomic journals.