A role for intercellular antigen transfer in the recognition of EBV-transformed B cell lines by EBV nuclear antigen-specific CD4+ T cells

The CD4+ T cell response to EBV may have an important role in controlling virus-driven B lymphoproliferation because CD4+ T cell clones to a subset of EBV nuclear Ag (EBNA) epitopes can directly recognize virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) in vitro and inhibit their growth. In this study, we used a panel of EBNA1, 2, 3A, and 3C-specific CD4+ T cell clones to study the route whereby endogenously expressed EBNAs access the HLA class II-presentation pathway. Two sets of results spoke against a direct route of intracellular access. First, none of the clones recognized cognate Ag overexpressed in cells from vaccinia vectors but did recognize Ag fused to an endo/lysosomal targeting sequence. Second, focusing on clones with the strongest LCL recognition that were specific for EBNA2- and EBNA3C-derived epitopes LCL recognition was unaffected by inhibiting autophagy, a postulated route for intracellular Ag delivery into the HLA class II pathway in LCL cells. Subsequently, using these same epitope-specific clones, we found that Ag-negative cells with the appropriate HLA-restricting allele could be efficiently sensitized to CD4+ T cell recognition by cocultivation with Ag-positive donor lines or by exposure to donor line-conditioned culture medium. Sensitization was mediated by a high m.w. antigenic species and required active Ag processing by recipient cells. We infer that intercellular Ag transfer plays a major role in the presentation of EBNA-derived CD4 epitopes by latently infected target cells.     

Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C (EBNA3C) interacts with the metabolism sensing C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) repressor to upregulate host genes

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is associated with the development of specific types of lymphoma and some epithelial cancers. EBV infection of resting B-lymphocytes in vitro drives them to proliferate as lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) and serves as a model for studying EBV lymphomagenesis. EBV nuclear antigen 3C (EBNA3C) is one of the genes required for LCL growth and previous work has suggested that suppression of the CDKN2A encoded tumor suppressor p16^INK4A and possibly p14^ARF is central to EBNA3C’s role in this growth transformation. To directly assess whether loss of p16 and/or p14 was sufficient to explain EBNA3C growth effects, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to disrupt specific CDKN2A exons in EBV transformed LCLs. Disruption of p16 specific exon 1α and the p16/p14 shared exon 2 were each sufficient to restore growth in the absence of EBNA3C. Using EBNA3C conditional LCLs knocked out for either exon 1α or 2, we identified EBNA3C induced and repressed genes. By trans-complementing with EBNA3C mutants, we determined specific genes that require EBNA3C interaction with RBPJ or CtBP for their regulation. Unexpectedly, interaction with the CtBP repressor was required not only for repression, but also for EBNA3C induction of many host genes. Contrary to previously proposed models, we found that EBNA3C does not recruit CtBP to the promoters of these genes. Instead, our results suggest that CtBP is bound to these promoters in the absence of EBNA3C and that EBNA3C interaction with CtBP interferes with the repressive function of CtBP, leading to EBNA3C mediated upregulation.     

Reduced IRF4 expression promotes lytic phenotype in Type 2 EBV-infected B cells

Humans are infected with two types of EBV (Type 1 (T1) and Type 2 (T2)) that differ substantially in their EBNA2 and EBNA 3A/B/C latency proteins and have different phenotypes in B cells. T1 EBV transforms B cells more efficiently than T2 EBV in vitro, and T2 EBV-infected B cells are more lytic. We previously showed that both increased NFATc1/c2 activity, and an NFAT-binding motif within the BZLF1 immediate-early promoter variant (Zp-V3) contained in all T2 strains, contribute to lytic infection in T2 EBV-infected B cells. Here we compare cellular and viral gene expression in early-passage lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) infected with either T1 or T2 EBV strains. Using bulk RNA-seq, we show that T2 LCLs are readily distinguishable from T1 LCLs, with approximately 600 differentially expressed cellular genes. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) suggests that T2 LCLs have increased B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling, NFAT activation, and enhanced expression of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition-associated genes. T2 LCLs also have decreased RNA and protein expression of a cellular gene required for survival of T1 LCLs, IRF4. In addition to its essential role in plasma cell differentiation, IRF4 decreases BCR signaling. Knock-down of IRF4 in a T1 LCL (infected with the Zp-V3-containing Akata strain) induced lytic reactivation whereas over-expression of IRF4 in Burkitt lymphoma cells inhibited both NFATc1 and NFATc2 expression and lytic EBV reactivation. Single-cell RNA-seq confirmed that T2 LCLs have many more lytic cells compared to T1 LCLs and showed that lytically infected cells have both increased NFATc1, and decreased IRF4, compared to latently infected cells. These studies reveal numerous differences in cellular gene expression in B cells infected with T1 versus T2 EBV and suggest that decreased IRF4 contributes to both the latent and lytic phenotypes in cells with T2 EBV.     

The only domain which distinguishes Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A (LMP2A) from LMP2B is dispensable for lymphocyte infection and growth transformation in vitro; LMP2A is therefore nonessential.

Using second-site homologous recombination, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) recombinants were constructed which carry an LMP2A mutation terminating translation at codon 19. Despite the absence of LMP2A or LMP2A cross-reactive protein, the recombinants were able to initiate and maintain primary B-lymphocyte growth transformation in vitro. EBNA1, EBNA2, and LMP1 expression was unaffected by the LMP2A mutation. The LMP2A mutant recombinant EBV-infected lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) were identical to wild-type recombinant EBV-infected control LCLs with respect to initial outgrowth, subsequent growth, sensitivity to limiting cell dilution, sensitivity to low serum, and growth in soft agarose. The permissivity of LCLs for lytic EBV infection and virus replication was also unaffected by the LMP2A mutation.     

Distinction between Epstein-Barr virus type A (EBNA 2A) and type B (EBNA 2B) isolates extends to the EBNA 3 family of nuclear proteins.

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigens EBNA 3a, 3b, and 3c have recently been mapped to adjacent reading frames in the BamHI L and E fragments of the B95.8 EBV genome. We studied by immunoblotting the expression of the family of EBNA 3 proteins in a panel of 20 EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) carrying either type A (EBNA 2A-encoding) or type B (EBNA 2B-encoding) virus isolates. Certain human sera from donors naturally infected with type A isolates detected the EBNA 3a, 3b, and 3c proteins in all type A virus-transformed LCLs (with a single exception in which EBNA 3b was not detected) but detected only EBNA 3a in LCLs carrying type B isolates. These results were confirmed with human and murine antibodies with specific reactivity against sequences of the type A EBNA 3a, 3b, or 3c expressed in bacterial fusion proteins. Conversely, selected human sera from donors naturally infected with type B strains of EBV identified the EBNA 3a encoded by both types of isolates plus two novel EBNAs present only in type B, and not in type A, virus-transformed LCLs; these novel proteins appear to be the type B homologs of EBNA 3b and 3c. The distinction between type A and type B EBV isolates therefore extends beyond the EBNA 2 gene to the EBNA 3 family of proteins. This has important implications with respect to the evolutionary origin of these two EBV types and also places in a new light recent studies which identified differences between type A and type B transformants in terms of growth phenotype (A. B. Rickinson, L. S. Young, and M. Rowe, J. Virol. 61:1310-1317, 1987) and of detection by EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells (D. J. Moss, I. S. Misko, S. R. Burrows, K. Burman, R. McCarthy, and T. B. Sculley, Nature [London] 331:719-721, 1988).     

Epstein-Barr virus efficiently immortalizes human B cells without neutralizing the function of p53.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) efficiently converts resting human B cells into actively cycling, immortal, lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). Here we show that LCLs expressing the full complement of latent viral genes are very sensitive to DNA-damaging agents such as cisplatin. The response includes a rapid accumulation of the tumour suppressor protein p53 and induction of the cellular genes mdm2 and WAF1/p21. Although the levels of Bcl2 protein and Bax mRNA appear unaltered by the activation of p53, within 24 h the majority of cells undergo apoptosis. Over-expression of wild-type p53 in an LCL also resulted in apoptosis; this was preceded by the dephosphorylation of the retinoblastoma gene product, pRb. Primary resting B cells showed no response to cisplatin and even after drug treatment, p53 remained undetectable. However, after infection with EBV, p53 gene expression was induced to a similar level to that found in mitogen-activated B cells. When the physiologically activated primary B cells were exposed to cisplatin, although p53 accumulated as in LCLs, the outcome was growth-arrest rather than gross cell death. We conclude that, in contrast to the transformation of fibroblasts by adenovirus, SV40 or HPV, when B cells become activated and immortalized by EBV they are sensitized to the p53-mediated damage response. When the resulting LCLs are treated with genotoxic agents such as cisplatin, they are unable to arrest like normal cells because they are driven to proliferate by EBV and consequently undergo apoptosis.     

Stimulation with allogeneic Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines generates HLA class I-specific CTLs with different target cell avidity.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) are potent inducers of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC). The contribution of EBV antigens to the induction of cytotoxic responses was investigated by comparing CTL clones derived from allogeneic MLCs of lymphocytes from one EBV seropositive and one seronegative donor for their capacity to lyse paired EBV positive and negative targets. The majority of the clones showed a conventional "HLA-specific" cytotoxicity and lysed equally well HLA-matched LCLs and mitogen-induced T- or B-blasts. A minority of the clones from both donors exhibited an "LCL-selective" killing potential as they lysed poorly T- and B-blasts. The LCL-selective clones did not recognize EBV antigens because they could not discriminate between EBV negative Burkitt lymphoma (BL) lines and their in vitro EBV-converted sublines. MAbs to CD3, CD8, and MHC class I antigens blocked the lysis of LCLs by HLA-specific and LCL-selective CTLs with comparable efficiency suggesting that the two effector types express T-cell receptors of similar affinity. T-blasts were unable to inhibit the lysis of LCLs in cross competition assays. This correlated with a significantly lower expression of the cell adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and LFA-3. The results suggest that stimulation with allogeneic LCLs activates HLA class I-specific CTLs with variable target cell avidity. Only CTLs that act independently of the enhancing effect of cell adhesion molecules are able to lyse mitogen-induced T- and B-blasts.