Differential glutamate-dependent and glutamate-independent adenosine A1 receptor-mediated modulation of dopamine release in different striatal compartments

Adenosine and dopamine are two important modulators of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the striatum. However, conflicting reports exist about the role of adenosine and adenosine receptors in the modulation of striatal dopamine release. It has been previously suggested that adenosine A(1) receptors localized in glutamatergic nerve terminals indirectly modulate dopamine release, by their ability to modulate glutamate release. In the present study, using in vivo microdialysis, we provide evidence for the existence of a significant glutamate-independent tonic modulation of dopamine release in most of the analyzed striatal compartments. In the dorsal, but not in the ventral, part of the shell of the nucleus accumbens (NAc), blockade of A(1) receptors by local perfusion with the selective A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethyl-xanthine or by systemic administration of the non-selective adenosine antagonist caffeine induced a glutamate-dependent release of dopamine. On the contrary, A(1) receptor blockade induced a glutamate-independent dopamine release in the core of the NAc and the nucleus caudate-putamen. Furthermore, using immunocytochemical and functional studies in rat striatal synaptosomes, we demonstrate that a fraction of striatal dopaminergic terminals contains adenosine A(1) receptors, which directly inhibit dopamine release independently of glutamatergic transmission.     

Adenosine A 2A receptor antagonists prevent the increase in striatal glutamate levels induced by glutamate uptake inhibitors

Active uptake by neurons and glial cells is the main mechanism for maintaining extracellular glutamate at low, non-toxic concentrations. Activation of adenosine A(2A) receptors increases extracellular glutamate levels, while A(2A) receptor antagonists reduce stimulated glutamate outflow. Whether a modulation of the glutamate uptake system is involved in the effects elicited by A(2A) receptor blockers has never been investigated. This study examined the ability of adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists to prevent the increase in glutamate levels induced by blockade of the glutamate uptake. In rats implanted with a microdialysis probe in the dorsal striatum, perfusion with 4 mm l-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid (PDC, a transportable competitive inhibitor of glutamate uptake), or 10 mm dihydrokainic acid (DHK, a non-transportable competitive inhibitor that mainly blocks the glial glutamate transporter GLT-1), significantly increased extracellular glutamate levels. The effects of PDC and DHK were completely prevented by the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists SCH 58261 (0.01 mg/kg i.p.) and/or ZM 241385 (5 nm via probe). Since an impairment in glutamate transporter function is thought to play a major role in neurodegenerative disorders, the regulation of glutamate uptake may be one of the mechanisms of the neuroprotective effects of A(2A) receptor antagonists.     

Genetic and pharmacological inactivation of the adenosine A2A receptor attenuates 3-nitropropionic acid-induced striatal damage

Adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) antagonism attenuates 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration and quinolinic acid-induced excitotoxicity in the neostriatum. As A2ARs are enriched in striatum, we investigated the effect of genetic and pharmacological A2A inactivation on striatal damage produced by the mitochondrial complex II inhibitor 3-nitropriopionic acid (3-NP). 3-NP was administered to A2AR knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) littermate mice over 5 days. Bilateral striatal lesions were analyzed from serial brain tissue sections. Whereas all of the 3-NP-treated WT mice (C57BL/6 genetic background) had bilateral striatal lesions, only one of eight of the 3-NP-treated A2AR KO mice had detectable striatal lesions. Similar attenuation of 3-NP-induced striatal damage was observed in A2AR KO mice in a 129-Steel background. In addition, the effect of pharmacological antagonism on 3-NP-induced striatal neurotoxicity was tested by pre-treatment of C57Bl/6 mice with the A2AR antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl) caffeine (CSC). Although bilateral striatal lesions were observed in all mice treated either with 3-NP alone or 3-NP plus vehicle, there were no demonstrable striatal lesions in mice treated with CSC (5 mg/kg) plus 3-NP and in five of six mice treated with CSC (20 mg/kg) plus 3-NP. We conclude that both genetic and pharmacological inactivation of the A2AR attenuates striatal neurotoxicity produced by 3-NP. Since the clinical and neuropathological features of 3-NP-induced striatal damage resemble those observed in Huntington's disease, the results suggest that A2AR antagonism may be a potential therapeutic strategy in Huntington's disease patients.     

Caffeine and an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist prevent memory impairment and synaptotoxicity in adult rats triggered by a convulsive episode in early life

Seizures early in life cause long‐term behavioral modifications, namely long‐term memory deficits in experimental animals. Since caffeine and adenosine A_2A receptor (A_2AR) antagonists prevent memory deficits in adult animals, we now investigated if they also prevented the long‐term memory deficits caused by a convulsive period early in life. Administration of kainate (KA, 2 mg/kg) to 7‐days‐old (P7) rats caused a single period of self‐extinguishable convulsions which lead to a poorer memory performance in the Y‐maze only when rats were older than 90 days, without modification of locomotion or anxiety‐like behavior in the elevated‐plus maze. In accordance with the relationship between synaptotoxicity and memory dysfunction, the hippocampus of these adult rats treated with kainate at P7 displayed a lower density of synaptic proteins such as SNAP‐25 and syntaxin (but not synaptophysin), as well as vesicular glutamate transporters type 1 (but not vesicular GABA transporters), with no changes in PSD‐95, NMDA receptor subunits (NR1, NR2A, NR2B) or α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methylisoxazole‐4‐propionate receptor subunits (GluR1, GluR2) compared with controls. Caffeine (1 g/L) or the A_2AR antagonist, KW6002 (3 mg/kg) applied in the drinking water from P21 onwards, prevented these memory deficits in P90 rats treated with KA at P7, as well as the accompanying synaptotoxicity. These results show that a single convulsive episode in early life causes a delayed memory deficit in adulthood accompanied by a glutamatergic synaptotoxicity that was prevented by caffeine or adenosine A_2AR antagonists.     

Adenosine A2A receptors control neuroinflammation and consequent hippocampal neuronal dysfunction

The blockade of adenosine A(2A) receptors (A2AR) affords a robust neuroprotection in different noxious brain conditions. However, the mechanisms underlying this general neuroprotection are unknown. One possible mechanism could be the control of neuroinflammation that is associated with brain damage, especially because A2AR efficiently control peripheral inflammation. Thus, we tested if the intracerebroventricular injection of a selective A2AR antagonist (SCH58261) would attenuate the changes in the hippocampus triggered by intraperitoneal administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that induces neuroinflammation through microglia activation. LPS administration triggers an increase in inflammatory mediators like interleukin-1β that causes biochemical changes (p38 and c-jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylation and caspase 3 activation) contributing to neuronal dysfunction typified by decreased long-term potentiation, a form of synaptic plasticity. Long-term potentiation, measured 30 min after the tetanus, was significantly lower in LPS-treated rats compared with control-treated rats, while SCH58261 attenuated the LPS-induced change. The LPS-induced increases in phosphorylation of c-jun N-terminal kinase and p38 and activation of caspase 3 were also prevented by SCH58261. Significantly, SCH58261 also prevented the LPS-induced recruitment of activated microglial cells and the increase in interleukin-1β concentration in the hippocampus, indicating that A2AR activation is a pivotal step in mediating the neuroinflammation triggered by LPS. These results indicate that A2AR antagonists prevent neuroinflammation and support the hypothesis that this mechanism might contribute for the ability of A2AR antagonists to control different neurodegenerative diseases known to involve neuroinflammation.     

Interaction of Adenosine and Guanine Derivatives in the Rat Hippocampus: Effects on Cyclic AMP Levels and on the Binding of Adenosine Analogues and GMP

Guanine nucleotides (GN) have been implicated in many intracellular mechanisms. Extracellular actions, probably as glutamate receptor antagonists, have also been recently attributed to these compounds. GN may have a neuroprotective role by inhibiting excitotoxic events evoked by glutamate. Effects of extracellular GN on adenosine-evoked cellular responses have also been reported. However, the exact mechanism of such interaction is not known. In the present study, we showed that GN potentiated adenosine-induced cAMP accumulation in slices of hippocampus from young rats. However, neither GMP nor the metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist, 1S,3R-ACPD, inhibited the binding of the adenosine receptor agonist [³H]NECA (when binding to adenosine A2 receptors), or the binding of the adenosine A2a receptor agonist [³H]CGS 21680 in hippocampal membrane preparations. GppNHp, probably by interacting with G-proteins, decreased [³H]CGS 21680 binding. [³H]GMP binding was assayed in order to evaluate the GN sites which are not G-proteins. [³H]GMP binding was inhibited by GMP and GppNHp, but not by 1S,3R-ACPD. The interaction of endogenous adenosine with the GMP-binding sites was determined by incubating membranes in the presence or absence of adenosine deaminase (ADA). NECA, CADO, CGS 21680 and CPA (only at the highest concentration used) increased GMP binding in the presence of ADA. However, in the absence of ADA, the control levels of GMP binding were as high as in the presence of added ADA plus adenosine agonists, indicating that endogenous adenosine modulates the binding of GMP. If this site has a neuroprotective role, adenosine may be increasing its neuromodulator and proposed protective action.     

Adenosine A2A receptors enhance GABA transport into nerve terminals by restraining PKC inhibition of GAT-1

Neurotransmitter transporters are regulated by phosphorylation but little is known about endogenous substances and receptors that regulate this process. Adenosine is an ubiquitous neuromodulator operating G-protein coupled receptors, which affect the activity of several kinases. We therefore evaluated the influence of adenosine upon the GABA transporter 1 (GAT-1) mediated GABA uptake into hippocampal synaptosomes. Removal of endogenous adenosine (adenosine deaminase, 1 U/mL) decreased GABA uptake, an effect mimicked by blockade of A2A receptors (2-(2-furanyl)-7-(2-phenylethyl)-7H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-5-amine, 50 nM) but not A1 or A2B receptors. A2A receptor activation (4-[2-[[6-amino-9-( N -ethyl-β- d -ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-yl]amino]ethyl]benzenepropanoic acid hydrochloride, 3–100 nM) enhanced GABA uptake by increasing the transporter Vmax without change of K_M. This was mimicked by adenylate cyclase activation (forskolin, 10 μM) and prevented by protein kinase A (PKA) inhibition ( N -[2-( p -bromocinnamylamino) ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide dihydrochloride, 1 μM), which per se did not influence GABA transport. Blockade of protein kinase C (PKC) (2-[1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)indol-3-yl]-3-(indol-3-yl) maleimide, 1 μM) facilitated GABA transport whereas PKC activation (4-β-phorbol-didecanoate, 250 nM) inhibited it. PKA blockade did not affect the facilitatory action of the PKC inhibitor or the inhibitory action of the PKC activator. However, when adenylate cyclase was activated neither activation nor inhibition of PKC affected GABA uptake. It is concluded that A2A receptors, through activation of the adenylate cyclase/cAMP/PKA transducing pathway facilitate GAT-1 mediated GABA transport into nerve endings by restraining tonic PKC-mediated inhibition.     

Possible Involvement of Pertussis Toxin-Sensitive G Proteins and D2 Dopamine Receptors in the A1 Adenosine Receptor-Adenylate Cyclase System in Rat Cerebral Cortex

To identify the involvement of dopamine receptors in the transmembrane signaling of the adenosine receptor-G protein-adenylate cyclase system in the CNS, we examined the effects of pertussis toxin (islet-activating protein, IAP) and apomorphine on A1 adenosine agonist (-)N6-R-[3H]phenylisopropyladenosine ([3H]PIA) and antagonist [3H]xanthine amine congener ([3H]XAC) binding activity and adenylate cyclase activity in cerebral cortex membranes of the rat brain. Specific binding to a single class of sites for [3H]XAC with a dissociation constant (KD) of 6.0 +/- 1.3 nM was observed. The number of maximal binding sites (Bmax) was 1.21 +/- 0.13 pmol/mg protein. Studies of the inhibition of [3H]XAC binding by PIA revealed the presence of two classes of PIA binding states, a high-affinity state (KD = 2.30 +/- 1.16 nM) and a low-affinity state (KD = 1.220 +/- 230 nM). Guanosine 5'-(3-O-thio)triphosphate or IAP treatment reduced the number of the high-affinity state binding sites without altering the KD for PIA. Apomorphine (100 microM) increased the KD value 10-fold and decreased Bmax by approximately 20% for [3H]PIA. The effect of apomorphine on the KD value increase was irreversible and due to a conversion from high-affinity to low-affinity states for PIA. The effect was dose dependent and was mediated via D2 dopamine receptors, since the D2 antagonist sulpiride blocked the phenomenon. The inhibitory effect of PIA on adenylate cyclase activity was abolished by apomorphine treatment. There was no effect of apomorphine on displacement of [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate (muscarinic ligand) binding by carbachol. These data suggest that A1 adenosine receptor binding and function are selectively modified by D2 dopaminergic agents.     

Adenosine A(2A) receptors are required for normal BDNF levels and BDNF-induced potentiation of synaptic transmission in the mouse hippocampus

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member of neurotrophin family, enhances synaptic transmission and regulates neuronal proliferation and survival. Both BDNF and its tyrosine kinase receptors (TrkB) are highly expressed in the hippocampus, where an interaction with adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2ARs) has been recently reported. In the present paper, we evaluated the role of A_2ARs in mediating functional effects of BDNF in hippocampus using A_2AR knock-out (KO) mice. In hippocampal slices from WT mice, application of BDNF (10 ng/mL) increased the slope of excitatory post-synaptic field potentials (fEPSPs), an index of synaptic facilitation. This increase of fEPSP slope was abolished by the selective A_2A antagonist ZM 241385. Similarly, genetic deletion of the A_2ARs abolished BDNF-induced increase of the fEPSP slope in slices from A_2AR KO mice The reduced functional ability of BDNF in A_2AR KO mice was correlated with the reduction in hippocampal BDNF levels. In agreement, the pharmacological blockade of A₂Rs by systemic ZM 241385 significantly reduced BDNF levels in the hippocampus of normal mice. These results indicate that the tonic activation of A_2ARs is required for BDNF-induced potentiation of synaptic transmission and for sustaining a normal BDNF tone in the hippocampus.     

Pre-synaptic adenosine A2A receptors control cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission

An interaction between adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A) Rs) and cannabinoid CB(1) receptors (CB(1) Rs) has been consistently reported to occur in the striatum, although the precise mechanisms are not completely understood. As both receptors control striatal glutamatergic transmission, we now probed the putative interaction between pre-synaptic CB(1) R and A(2A) R in the striatum. In extracellular field potentials recordings in corticostriatal slices from Wistar rats, A(2A) R activation by CGS21680 inhibited CB(1) R-mediated effects (depression of synaptic response and increase in paired-pulse facilitation). Moreover, in superfused rat striatal nerve terminals, A(2A) R activation prevented, while A(2A) R inhibition facilitated, the CB(1) R-mediated inhibition of 4-aminopyridine-evoked glutamate release. In summary, the present study provides converging neurochemical and electrophysiological support for the occurrence of a tight control of CB(1) R function by A(2A) Rs in glutamatergic terminals of the striatum. In view of the key role of glutamate to trigger the recruitment of striatal circuits, this pre-synaptic interaction between CB(1) R and A(2A) R may be of relevance for the pathogenesis and the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders affecting the basal ganglia.     

Adenosine A2A receptors and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors are co-localized and functionally interact in the hippocampus: a possible key mechanism in the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate effects

Hippocampal metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGlu5Rs) regulate both physiological and pathological responses to glutamate. Because mGlu5R activation enhances NMDA-mediated effects, and given the role played by NMDA receptors in synaptic plasticity and excitotoxicity, modulating mGlu5R may influence both the physiological and the pathological effects elicited by NMDA receptor stimulation. We evaluated whether adenosine A2A receptors (A(2A)Rs) modulated mGlu5R-dependent effects in the hippocampus, as they do in the striatum. Co-application of the A(2A)R agonist CGS 21680 with the mGlu5R agonist (RS)-2-chloro-s-hydroxyphenylglycine(CHPG) synergistically reduced field excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the CA1 area of rat hippocampal slices. Endogenous tone at A(2A)Rs seemed to be required to enable mGlu5R-mediated effects, as the ability of CHPG to potentiate NMDA effects was antagonized by the selective A(2A)R antagonist ZM 241385 in rat hippocampal slices and cultured hippocampal neurons, and abolished in the hippocampus of A(2A)R knockout mice. Evidence for the interaction between A(2A)Rs and mGlu5Rs was further strengthened by demonstrating their co-localization in hippocampal synapses. This is the first evidence showing that hippocampal A(2A)Rs and mGlu5Rs are co-located and act synergistically, and that A(2A)Rs play a permissive role in mGlu5R receptor-mediated potentiation of NMDA effects in the hippocampus.     

Effects of A1 and A2 Adenosine Receptor Antagonists on the Induction and Reversal of Long-Term Potentiation in Guinea Pig Hippocampal Slices of CA1 Neurons

1. Using simultaneous recordings of the field EPSP and the population spike in the CA1 neurons of guinea pig hippocampal slices, we confirmed that delivery of a high-frequency stimulation (tetanus: 100 pulses at 100 Hz) produced robust long-term potentiation of synaptic efficacy (LTP) in two independent components, a synaptic component that increases field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and a component that results in a larger population spike amplitude for a given EPSP size (E-S potentiation).2. In the same cells, reversal of LTP (depotentiation; DP) in the field EPSP and in the E-S component is achieved by delivering low-frequency afferent stimulation (LFS:1 Hz, 1000 pulses) 20 min after the tetanus.3. When the tetanus or LFS was applied to CA1 inputs in the presence of an adenosine A₁ receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (1 M), the field EPSP was enhances in LTP and attenuated in DP, while the E-S relationship was not significantly affected in either LTP or DP.4. When similar experiments were performed using an A₂ receptor antagonist, CP-66713 (10 M), the field EPSP was blocked in LTP but facilitated in DP, while E-S potentiation was enhanced during both LTP and DP.5. The results show that endogenous adenosine, acting via A₁ or A₂ receptors, modulates both the synaptic and the E-S components of the induction and reversal of LTP. Based on the results, we discuss the key issue of the contribution of these receptors to the dynamics of neuronal plasticity modification in hippocampal CA1 neurons.     

Adenosine receptor-mediated modulation of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens depends on glutamate neurotransmission and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor stimulation

Adenosine, by acting on adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors, exerts opposite modulatory roles on striatal extracellular levels of glutamate and dopamine, with activation of A(1) inhibiting and activation of A(2A) receptors stimulating glutamate and dopamine release. Adenosine-mediated modulation of striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission could be secondary to changes in glutamate neurotransmission, in view of evidence for a preferential colocalization of A(1) and A(2A) receptors in glutamatergic nerve terminals. By using in vivo microdialysis techniques, local perfusion of NMDA (3, 10 microm), the selective A(2A) receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680; 3, 10 microm), the selective A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (CPT; 300, 1000 microm), or the non-selective A(1)-A(2A) receptor antagonist in vitro caffeine (300, 1000 microm) elicited significant increases in extracellular levels of dopamine in the shell of the nucleus accumbens (NAc). Significant glutamate release was also observed with local perfusion of CGS 21680, CPT and caffeine, but not NMDA. Co-perfusion with the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist dl-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV; 100 microm) counteracted dopamine release induced by NMDA, CGS 21680, CPT and caffeine. Co-perfusion with the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist MSX-3 (1 microm) counteracted dopamine and glutamate release induced by CGS 21680, CPT and caffeine and did not modify dopamine release induced by NMDA. These results indicate that modulation of dopamine release in the shell of the NAc by A(1) and A(2A) receptors is mostly secondary to their opposite modulatory role on glutamatergic neurotransmission and depends on stimulation of NMDA receptors. Furthermore, these results underscore the role of A(1) vs. A(2A) receptor antagonism in the central effects of caffeine.     

Adenosine A2A receptors enable the synaptic effects of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the rodent striatum

Adenosine A_2A, cannabinoid CB₁ and metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu₅) receptors are all highly expressed in the striatum. The aim of the present work was to investigate whether, and by which mechanisms, the above receptors interact in the regulation of striatal synaptic transmission. By extracellular field potentials (FPs) recordings in corticostriatal slices, we demonstrated that the ability of the selective type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB₁R) agonist WIN55,212-2 to depress synaptic transmission was prevented by the pharmacological blockade or the genetic inactivation of A_2ARs. Such a permissive effect of A_2ARs towards CB₁Rs does not seem to occur pre-synaptically as the ability of WIN55,212-2 to increase the R2/R1 ratio under a protocol of paired-pulse stimulation was not modified by ZM241385. Furthermore, the effects of WIN55,212-2 were reduced in slices from mice lacking post-synaptic striatal A_2ARs. The selective mGlu₅R agonist (RS)-2-chloro-5-hydroxyphenylglycine (CHPG) potentiated the synaptic effects of WIN55,212-2, and such a potentiation was abolished by A_2AR blockade. Unlike the synaptic effects, the ability of WIN55,212-2 to prevent NMDA-induced toxicity was not influenced by ZM241385. Altogether, these results show that the state of activation of A_2ARs regulates the synaptic effects of CB₁Rs and that A_2ARs may control CB₁ effects also indirectly, namely through mGlu₅Rs.     

Adenosine inhibits calcium channel currents via A1 receptors on salamander retinal ganglion cells in a mini-slice preparation

The effects of adenosine on high-voltage-activated calcium channel currents in tiger salamander retinal ganglion cells were investigated in a mini-slice preparation. Adenosine produced a concentration-dependent decrease in the amplitude of calcium channel current with a maximum inhibition of 26%. The effects of adenosine on calcium channel current were both time- and voltage-dependent. In cells dialyzed with GTP-gamma-s, adenosine caused a sustained and irreversible inhibition of calcium channel current, suggesting involvement of a GTP-binding protein. The inhibitory effect of adenosine on calcium channel current was blocked by the A1 antagonist 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (DPCPX, 1-10 microm), but not by the A2 antagonist 3-7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX, 10 microm), and was mimicked by the A1 agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA, 1 microm) but not by the A2 agonist 5'-(N-cyclopropyl) carbox-amidoadenosine (CPCA, 1 microm). Adenosine's inhibition of calcium channel current was not affected by the L-type calcium channel blocker nifedipine (5 microm). However, adenosine's inhibition of calcium channel current was reduced to approximately 10% after application of omega-conotoxin GVIA (1 microm), suggesting that adenosine inhibits N-type calcium channels. These results show that adenosine acts on an A1 adenosine receptor subtype via a G protein-coupled pathway to inhibit the component of calcium channel current carried in N-type calcium channels.