Restoration of miR-101 suppresses lung tumorigenesis through inhibition of DNMT3a-dependent DNA methylation

The deregulation of miR-101 and DNMT3a has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple tumor types, but whether and how miR-101 silencing and DNMT3a overexpression contribute to lung tumorigenesis remain elusive. Here we show that miR-101 downregulation associates with DNMT3a overexpression in lung cancer cell lines and patient tissues. Ectopic miR-101 expression remarkably abrogated the DNMT3a 3′-UTR luciferase activity corresponding to the miR-101 binding site and caused an attenuated expression of endogenous DNMT3a, which led to a reduction of global DNA methylation and the re-expression of tumor suppressor CDH1 via its promoter DNA hypomethylation. Functionally, restoration of miR-101 expression suppressed lung cancer cell clonability and migration, which recapitulated the DNMT3a knockdown effects. Interestingly, miR-101 synergized with decitabine to downregulate DNMT3a and to reduce DNA methylation. Importantly, ectopic miR-101 expression was sufficient to trigger in vivo lung tumor regression and the blockage of metastasis. Consistent with these phenotypes, examination of xenograft tumors disclosed an increase of miR-101, a decrease of DNMT3a and the subsequent DNA demethylation. These findings support that the loss or suppression of miR-101 function accelerates lung tumorigenesis through DNMT3a-dependent DNA methylation, and suggest that miR-101-DNMT3a axis may have therapeutic value in treating refractory lung cancer.Owing to a high propensity for recurrence and a high rate of metastasis at the advanced stages,^{1, 2, 3} lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. DNA methylation is a major epigenetic rule controlling chromosomal stability and gene expression.^{4, 5} It is under control of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), whose overexpression in lung cancer cells predicts worse outcomes.^{6, 7} It is postulated that DNMT overexpression induces DNA hypermethylation and silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), leading to an aggressive lung cancer. Indeed, enforced expression of DNMT1 or DNMT3a increases DNA methylation, while the abolition of DNMT expression by genetic depletion, microRNAs (miRs) or small molecules reduces genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation and restores TSG expression.^{8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13} As TSGs are the master controllers for cell multiplicity and their silencing predicts poor prognosis,^{14, 15} TSG re-expression via promoter DNA hypomethylation inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell differentiation.^{13, 16} Thus, DNMT gene abundance could serve as a target for anticancer therapy, but how DNMT upregulation occurs in lung cancer is incompletely understood.MiRs are small non-coding RNAs that crucially regulate target gene expression. Up to 30% of all protein-coding genes are predicted to be targeted by miRs,^{17, 18} supporting the key roles of miRs in controlling cell fate.^{19, 20, 21, 22} Research is showing that certain miRs are frequently dysregulated in cancers, including lung cancer.^{7, 23, 24} As miR targets can promote or inhibit cancer cell expansion, miRs have huge potential for acting as bona fide oncogenes (i.e., miR-21) or TSGs (i.e., miR-29b).^{7, 25} We and others demonstrated that the levels of DNMT1 or DNMT3a or DNMT3b are regulated by miR-29b, miR-148, miR-152 or miR-30c,^{7, 13, 26, 27} and overexpression of these miRs results in DNA hypomethylation and TSG reactivation with the concurrent blockage of cancer cell proliferation.^{7, 13} These findings underscore the importance of miRs as epigenetic modulators and highlight their therapeutic applications.MiR-101 is frequently silenced in human cancers^{28, 29, 30, 31} and, importantly, exhibits antitumorigenic properties when overexpressed. Mechanistically, miR-101 inactivation by genomic loss causes the overexpression of EZH2, a histone methyltransferase, via 3′-UTR targeting, which is followed by histone hypermethylation and aggressive tumorigenesis.^{29, 30, 32} However, whether and how miR-101 silencing contributes to DNA hypermethylation patterning in lung cancer is unclear. In this study, we explore the role of miR-101 in regulating DNMT3a expression and the impacts of miR-101-DNMT3a nexus on lung cancer pathogenesis. We showed that the expression of miR-101 and DNMT3a was negatively correlated in lung cancer. We presented evidence that ectopic miR-101 expression decreased DNMT3a levels, reduced global DNA methylation and upregulated CDH1 via its promoter DNA demethylation. The biological significance of miR-101-mediated DNA hypomethylation and CDH1 re-expression was evident by its inhibition of lung tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our findings mechanistically and functionally link miR-101 silencing to DNA hypermethylation in lung cancer cells.     

MicroRNA-587 antagonizes 5-FU-induced apoptosis and confers drug resistance by regulating PPP2R1B expression in colorectal cancer

Drug resistance is one of the major hurdles for cancer treatment. However, the underlying mechanisms are still largely unknown and therapeutic options remain limited. In this study, we show that microRNA (miR)-587 confers resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced apoptosis in vitro and reduces the potency of 5-FU in the inhibition of tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model in vivo. Further studies indicate that miR-587 modulates drug resistance through downregulation of expression of PPP2R1B, a regulatory subunit of the PP2A complex, which negatively regulates AKT activation. Knockdown of PPP2R1B expression increases AKT phosphorylation, which leads to elevated XIAP expression and enhanced 5-FU resistance; whereas rescue of PPP2R1B expression in miR-587-expressing cells decreases AKT phosphorylation/XIAP expression, re-sensitizing colon cancer cells to 5-FU-induced apoptosis. Moreover, a specific and potent AKT inhibitor, MK2206, reverses miR-587-conferred 5-FU resistance. Importantly, studies of colorectal cancer specimens indicate that the expression of miR-587 and PPP2R1B positively and inversely correlates with chemoresistance, respectively, in colorectal cancer. These findings indicate that the miR-587/PPP2R1B/pAKT/XIAP signaling axis has an important role in mediating response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. A major implication of our study is that inhibition of miR-587 or restoration of PPP2R1B expression may have significant therapeutic potential to overcome drug resistance in colorectal cancer patients and that the combined use of an AKT inhibitor with 5-FU may increase efficacy in colorectal cancer treatment.Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the US. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the chemotherapeutic drugs most widely used alone or combined with other drugs in colorectal cancer treatment.¹ 5-FU primarily interrupts synthesis of the pyrimidine thymidine, a nucleoside required for DNA replication, by blocking the activity of thymidylate synthase.² Consequently, 5-FU induces cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis in cancer cells. Although adjuvant 5-FU treatment has yielded a good success rate, the failure of treatment in over 90% of patients with metastatic cancer is due to drug resistance.³ Many mechanisms have been suggested to be responsible for drug resistance, including blocking apoptosis.^{2, 4, 5, 6} Although resistance to chemotherapy is one of the biggest obstacles for effective cancer therapy, no significant advance has been made to identify targets overcoming drug resistance.⁷MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small (about 22 bps) non-coding regulatory RNA molecules, which regulate gene expression primarily by binding to the 3′-UTRs of their target mRNAs to initiate sequence-specific mRNA cleavage or to inhibit translation.⁸ It is estimated that more than one-third of human genes and the majority of genetic pathways are regulated by miRNAs.⁹ MiRNAs have been virtually linked to all known biological processes as well as various pathological diseases including cancer.¹⁰ Alternations in miRNA expression have been associated with many human cancers.^{11, 12} The pleiotropic nature of gene regulation by miRNAs implies that some miRNAs may function as crucial mediators of drug resistance. In fact, miRNA-based anticancer therapies are being developed, either alone or in combination with targeted therapies, with the goal to improve disease response and increase patient survival.¹³The protein kinase B (AKT/PKB) kinases, including AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3, are essential regulators of various signaling pathways and cellular processes.¹⁴ Hyper-activation of AKT kinases have been frequently observed in human cancers.¹⁵ Activation of AKT requires both translocation to the plasma membrane and phosphorylation at Thr308 and Ser473.^{16, 17} Further studies have demonstrated that Thr308 phosphorylation is necessary and sufficient for AKT activation¹⁸ and that dephosphorylation at Thr308 alone leads to deactivation of AKT.^{19, 20} X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) family and has a significant role in cell survival by modulating death-signaling pathways at a post-mitochondrial level.^{21, 22} Studies have shown that AKT activation can enhance the protein stability of XIAP, therefore elevating XIAP expression.^{23, 24, 25} Consequently, AKT has been shown to promote cell survival through the XIAP-mediated anti-apoptotic pathway.²⁶The serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2 A (PP2A) holoenzyme is composed of a catalytic C subunit, a structural A subunit and a regulatory B subunit. PPP2R1B or PP2A A subunit beta isoform (PP2A-Aβ) is a constant regulatory subunit of PP2A required to activate PP2A. PPP2R1B was initially characterized as a tumor suppressor. It is located at a chromosomal region (11q23) frequently deleted in human cancers.²⁷ Its mutations and alterations have been found in colorectal and other cancers.^{28, 29} Cancer-associated mutants of PPP2R1B have been shown to be incompetent to bind the B and/or C subunits in vitro, resulting in PP2A inactivation.^{30, 31} PP2A regulates numerous signaling pathways. Specifically, PP2A has an important role in regulating AKT activity by dephosphorylating AKT at Thr308 and Ser473, leading to AKT inactivation.^{19, 32, 33, 34}In this study, we have discovered a novel miR-587/PPP2R1B (PP2A)/pAKT/XIAP signaling axis that mediates the response of colon cancer cells to 5-FU treatment. Our results show that miR-587 expression is suppressed by 5-FU treatment in the sensitive but not resistant colon cancer cells. MiR-587 confers resistance to 5-FU-induced apoptosis through the inhibition of PPP2R1B expression, which is a direct target of miR-587. Knockdown of PPP2R1B by siRNAs confers 5-FU resistance in colon cancer cells, mimicking miR-587 effect. Inhibition of miR-587 expression or rescue of PPP2R1B expression in colon cancer cells increases their sensitivity to 5-FU treatment. Additionally, an AKT inhibitor, MK-2206, re-sensitizes miR-587-expressing cells to 5-FU treatment. Moreover, experiments in tumor xenograft mouse models reveal that miR-587 significantly reduces the effectiveness of 5-FU in the inhibition of tumor growth in vivo. Importantly, studies of colorectal cancer specimens indicate a positive correlation between miR-587 expression and chemoresistance and an inverse correlation between PPP2R1B expression and drug resistance. Our studies have identified miR-587 as a potential target for drug resistance in colorectal cancer and suggested that modulating the PPP2R1B (PP2A)/pAKT/XIAP axis may have benefits against drug resistance.     

PAK1 regulates RUFY3-mediated gastric cancer cell migration and invasion

Actin protrusion at the cell periphery is central to the formation of invadopodia during tumor cell migration and invasion. Although RUFY3 (RUN and FYVE domain containing 3)/SINGAR1 (single axon-related1)/RIPX (Rap2 interacting protein X) has an important role in neuronal development, its pathophysiologic role and relevance to cancer are still largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which RUFY3 involves in gastric cancer cell migration and invasion. Here, our data show that overexpression of RUFY3 leads to the formation of F-actin-enriched protrusive structures at the cell periphery and induces gastric cancer cell migration. Furthermore, P21-activated kinase-1 (PAK1) interacts with RUFY3, and promotes RUFY3 expression and RUFY3-induced gastric cancer cell migration; inhibition of PAK1 attenuates RUFY3-induced SGC-7901 cell migration and invasion. Importantly, we found that the inhibitory effect of cell migration and invasion is significantly enhanced by knockdown of both PAK1 and RUFY3 compared with knockdown of RUFY3 alone or PAK1 alone. Strikingly, we found significant upregulation of RUFY3 in gastric cancer samples with invasive carcinoma at pathologic TNM III and TNM IV stages, compared with their non-tumor counterparts. Moreover, an obvious positive correlation was observed between the protein expression of RUFY3 and PAK1 in 40 pairs of gastric cancer samples. Therefore, these findings provide important evidence that PAK1 can positively regulate RUFY3 expression, which contribute to the metastatic potential of gastric cancer cells, maybe blocking PAK1-RUFY3 signaling would become a potential metastasis therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for gastric cancer metastasis are needed to be elucidated. Invasion of tumor cells is the key step in determining the aggressive phenotype of human cancers and compose the paramount causes of cancer deaths.¹ The motility and invasion of cancer cell participates in a complex and integrated series of events that are primarily controlled by the regulation and reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton.^{1, 2} Regulation of actin polymerization is responsible for the formation of protrusive structures that are essential for tumor cell movement and invasion, including filopodia, lamellipodia and invadopodia.³ To improve the survival rate of cancer patients, it is of practical significance to investigate the proteins governing metastasis and to identify novel prognostic markers and therapeutic targets.Human RUFY3 (RUN and FYVE domain containing 3), also known as RIPX (Rap2 interacting protein X) or Singar1 (single axon-related1), is a 469-amino-acid protein and is the highly expressed in brain tissue. The N-terminal region of RUFY3 and its homologs, including RPIP8⁴ and RPIP9,⁵ contains the RUN domain, which can interact with Rap2^{4, 5, 6} and Rab.^{7, 8} The crystal structures indicate that RUFY3 contains a RUN domain⁹ and two coiled-coil domains.¹⁰ Several proteins containing RUN domain have been shown to be involved in Ras-like GTPase signaling¹¹ and Rab-mediated membrane trafficking.^{12, 13, 14, 15, 16} RUFY3 is thought to localize in growth cones and have a role in neuronal development by suppressing the formation of surplus axons to maintain optimal neuronal polarity.^{17, 18} However, up to date, its pathophysiologic role and relevance to cancer metastasis are still unexplored.The human RUFY3 was identified by a yeast two-hybrid assay using P21-activated kinase-1 (PAK1) as a bait protein in our studies. The PAKs, a family of serine/threonine protein kinases, have pivotal roles in cytoskeletal reorganization,¹⁹ survival,²⁰ motility^{21, 22} and tumorigenesis.²³ There has been mounting evidence that PAK1 is tightly related to the progression and metastasis of cancer and may become a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target for cancer.^{24, 25} For example, elevated PAK1 expression is correlated with cancer progression and lymph node metastases in gastric cancer tissues.^{26, 27} Therefore, it is worthwhile to study the novel binding partners of PAK1.In this study, we report that RUFY3 localizes in F-actin-enriched invadopodia and induces the formation of protrusive structures. Importantly, we found that the overexpression of RUFY3 promotes gastric cancer cell migration and invasion. Furthermore, we showed that PAK1 can affect RUFY3-mediated gastric cancer cell migration and invasion by regulating its expression. In gastric cancer samples, we showed a positive relationship between PAK1 and RUFY3, and that increased expression of RUFY3 is positively correlated with clinical gastric cancer samples. This report is the first investigation focused on exploring the role of RUFY3 in cancer cells and the relationship between PAK1 and RUFY3.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.