Structure of a Viral Cap-independent Translation Element That Functions via High Affinity Binding to the eIF4E Subunit of eIF4F

RNAs of many positive strand RNA viruses lack a 5′ cap structure and instead rely on cap-independent translation elements (CITEs) to facilitate efficient translation initiation. The mechanisms by which these RNAs recruit ribosomes are poorly understood, and for many viruses the CITE is unknown. Here we identify the first CITE of an umbravirus in the 3′-untranslated region of pea enation mosaic virus RNA 2. Chemical and enzymatic probing of the ∼100-nucleotide PEMV RNA 2 CITE (PTE), and mutagenesis revealed that it forms a long, bulged helix that branches into two short stem-loops, with a possible pseudoknot interaction between a C-rich bulge at the branch point and a G-rich bulge in the main helix. The PTE inhibited translation in trans, and addition of eIF4F, but not eIFiso4F, restored translation. Filter binding assays revealed that the PTE binds eIF4F and its eIF4E subunit with high affinity. Tight binding required an intact cap-binding pocket in eIF4E. Among many PTE mutants, there was a strong correlation between PTE-eIF4E binding affinity and ability to stimulate cap-independent translation. We conclude that the PTE recruits eIF4F by binding eIF4E. The PTE represents a different class of translation enhancer element, as defined by its structure and ability to bind eIF4E in the absence of an m⁷G cap.Regulation of translation occurs primarily at the initiation step. This involves recognition of the 5′ m⁷G(5′)ppp(5′)N cap structure on the mRNA by initiation factors, which recruit the ribosome to the 5′-end of the mRNA (1–5). The 5′ cap structure and the poly(A) tail are necessary for efficient recruitment of initiation factors on eukaryotic mRNAs (3, 6–8). The cap is recognized by the eIF4E subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor complex eIF4F (or the eIFiso4E subunit of eIFiso4F in higher plants). The poly(A) tail is recognized by poly(A)-binding protein. In plants, eIF4F is a heterodimer consisting of eIF4E and eIF4G, the core scaffolding protein to which the other factors bind. eIF4A, an ATPase/RNA helicase, interacts with eIF4F but is not part of the eIF4F heterodimer (9, 10). For translation initiation, the purpose of eIF4E is to bring eIF4G to the capped mRNA. eIF4G then recruits the 43 S ternary ribosomal complex via interaction with eIF3.The RNAs of many positive sense RNA viruses contain a cap-independent translation element (CITE)³ that allows efficient translation in the absence of a 5′ cap structure (11–13). In animal viruses and some plant viruses, the CITE is an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) located upstream of the initiation codon. Most viral IRESes neither interact with nor require eIF4E, because they lack the m⁷GpppN structure, which, until this report, was thought to be necessary for mRNA to bind eIF4E with high affinity (3, 14). Translation initiation efficiency of mRNA is also influenced by the length of, and the degree of secondary structure in the 5′ leader (15–17).Many uncapped plant viral RNAs harbor a CITE in the 3′-UTR that confers highly efficient translation initiation at the 5′-end of the mRNA (18–22). These 3′ CITEs facilitate ribosome entry and apparently conventional scanning at the 5′-end of the mRNA (17, 23, 24). A variety of unrelated structures has been found to function as 3′ CITEs, suggesting that they recruit the ribosome by different interactions with initiation factors (13).The factors with which a plant CITE interacts to recruit the ribosome have been identified for only a potyvirus, a luteovirus, and a satellite RNA. The 143-nt 5′-UTR CITE of the potyvirus, tobacco etch virus is an IRES that functions by binding of its AU-rich pseudoknot structure with eIF4G (25). It binds eIF4G with up to 30-fold greater affinity than eIFiso4G and does not require eIF4E for IRES activity. In addition to RNA elements, the genome-linked viral protein (VPg) of potyviruses may participate in cap-independent translation initiation by interacting with the eIF4E and eIFiso4E subunits of eIF4F and eIFiso4F, respectively (26–31). In contrast, the 130-nt cap-independent translation enhancer domain (TED) in the 3′-UTR of satellite tobacco necrosis virus (STNV) RNA forms a long bulged stem-loop, which interacts strongly with both eIF4F and eIFiso4F and weakly with their eIF4E and eIFiso4E subunits (32), suggesting that the TED requires the full eIF4F or eIFiso4F for a biologically relevant interaction. Barley yellow dwarf luteovirus (BYDV) and several other viruses, have a different structure, called a BYDV-like CITE (BTE), in the 3′-UTR. The BTE is characterized by a 17-nt conserved sequence incorporated in a structure with a variable number of stem-loops radiating from a central junction (20, 33, 34). It requires and binds the eIF4G subunit of eIF4F and does not bind free eIF4E, eIFiso4E, or eIFiso4G, although eIF4E slightly enhances the BTE-eIF4G interaction (35). Other 3′ CITEs have been identified, but the host factors with which they interact are unknown.Here we describe unprecedented factor interactions of a CITE found in an umbravirus and a panicovirus. Umbraviruses show strong similarity to the Luteovirus and Dianthovirus genera in (i) the sequence of the replication genes encoded by ORFs 1 and 2, (ii) the predicted structure of the frameshift signals required for translation of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from ORF 2 (36, 37), (iii) the absence of a poly(A) tail, and (iv) the lack of a 5′ cap structure (37, 38). Umbraviruses are unique in that they encode no coat protein. For the umbravirus pea enation mosaic virus 2 (PEMV-2), the coat protein is provided by PEMV-1, an enamovirus (39). Uncapped PEMV-2 RNA (PEMV RNA 2), transcribed in vitro, is infectious in pea (Pisum sativa),⁴ indicating it must be translated cap-independently. The 3′-UTRs of some umbraviruses such as Tobacco bushy top virus and Groundnut rosette virus harbor sequences resembling BYDV-like CITEs (BTE).⁵ However, no BTE is apparent in the 3′-UTR of PEMV RNA 2. In this report we identify a different class of CITE in the 705-nt long 3′-UTR of PEMV RNA 2, determine its secondary structure, which may include an unusual pseudoknot, and we show that, unlike any other natural uncapped RNA, it has a high affinity for eIF4E, which is necessary to facilitate cap-independent translation.     

The C-Terminal Region of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 3a (eIF3a) Promotes mRNA Recruitment,Scanning, and,Together with eIF3j and the eIF3b RNA Recognition Motif,Selection of AUG Start Codons

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the a/Tif32 subunit of budding yeast eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) interacts with eIF3 subunits j/Hcr1 and b/Prt1 and can bind helices 16 to 18 of 18S rRNA, suggesting proximity to the mRNA entry channel of the 40S subunit. We have identified substitutions in the conserved Lys-Glu-Arg-Arg (KERR) motif and in residues of the nearby box6 element of the a/Tif32 CTD that impair mRNA recruitment by 43S preinitiation complexes (PICs) and confer phenotypes indicating defects in scanning and start codon recognition. The normally dispensable CTD of j/Hcr1 is required for its binding to a/Tif32 and to mitigate the growth defects of these a/Tif32 mutants, indicating physical and functional interactions between these two domains. The a/Tif32 CTD and the j/Hcr1 N-terminal domain (NTD) also interact with the RNA recognition motif (RRM) in b/Prt1, and mutations in both subunits that disrupt their interactions with the RRM increase leaky scanning of an AUG codon. These results, and our demonstration that the extreme CTD of a/Tif32 binds to Rps2 and Rps3, lead us to propose that the a/Tif32 CTD directly stabilizes 43S subunit-mRNA interaction and that the b/Prt1-RRM-j/Hcr1-a/Tif32-CTD module binds near the mRNA entry channel and regulates the transition between scanning-conducive and initiation-competent conformations of the PIC.Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) is a multisubunit protein complex that has been implicated in several steps of the translation initiation pathway (reviewed in reference 19). These steps include recruitment of the eIF2-GTP-Met-ternary complex (TC) and other eIFs to the small (40S) ribosomal subunit to form the 43S preinitiation complex (PIC), mRNA recruitment by the 43S PIC, and subsequent scanning of the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) for an AUG start codon. The eIF3 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is composed of only 6 subunits (a/Tif32, b/Prt1, c/Nip1, i/Tif34, g/Tif35, and j/Hcr1), which have homologs in the larger, 13-subunit eIF3 complex in mammals. Yeast eIF3 can be purified with the TC, eIF1, and eIF5 in a ribosome-free assembly called the multifactor complex (MFC) (2), whose formation appears to promote assembly or stability of the 43S PIC and to stimulate scanning and AUG selection (10, 23, 32, 42, 48, 49, 51).In mammals, there is evidence that eIF3 enhances recruitment of mRNA by interacting directly with eIF4G, the “scaffold” subunit of mRNA cap-binding complex eIF4F, and forming a protein bridge between mRNA and the 43S PIC (24, 25, 35). In budding yeast, direct eIF3-eIF4G interaction has not been detected, and the eIF3-binding domain (25) is not evident in yeast eIF4G. Moreover, depletion of eIF3, but not eIF4G, from yeast cells provokes a strong decrease in the amount of an mRNA (RPL41A) associated with native PICs (23). However, since depletion of eIF3 also reduced the amounts of other MFC components associated with PICs, it remained unclear whether eIF3 acts directly in mRNA recruitment.In favor of a direct role for eIF3, cross-linking analysis of reconstituted mammalian 48S PICs identified contacts of subunits eIF3a and eIF3d with mRNA residues 8 to 17 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the AUG codon, suggesting that these subunits form an extension of the mRNA exit channel (37). Consistent with this, we found that the N-terminal domain (NTD) of yeast a/Tif32 binds Rps0A, located near the mRNA exit pore, and functionally interacts with sequences 5′ to the regulatory upstream open reading frame 1 (uORF1) in GCN4 mRNA (42). Despite these advances, in vivo evidence supporting a direct role of eIF3 in mRNA recruitment by 43S PICs is lacking.Recently, there has been progress in elucidating the molecular mechanisms involved in ribosomal scanning and AUG selection. Reconstituted mammalian 43S PICs containing only eIF1, -1A, and -3 and the TC can scan the leader of an unstructured message and form a stable 48S PIC at the 5′-proximal AUG codon (35). eIF1 and -1A are thought to promote scanning by stabilizing an open conformation of the 40S subunit (6, 13, 26, 27), which appears to involve opening the “latch” on the mRNA entry channel formed by helices 18 and 34 of 18S rRNA (33). eIF1A also promotes a mode of TC binding conducive to scanning (39) and seems to prevent full accommodation of Met-in the P site at non-AUG codons (53). The GTP bound to eIF2 is hydrolyzed, in a manner stimulated by eIF5, but release of phosphate (P_i) from eIF2-GDP-P_i is blocked by eIF1 (1). Entry of AUG into the P site triggers relocation of eIF1 from its binding site on the 40S subunit (27), allowing P_i release (1) and stabilizing the closed, scanning-arrested conformation of the 40S subunit (33).Mutations in eIF1 and eIF1A that reduce the stringency of start codon recognition have been isolated by their ability to increase initiation at a UUG codon in his4 alleles lacking the AUG start codon (the Sui⁻ phenotype) (6, 12, 13, 29, 38, 39, 52). eIF1A mutations with the opposite effect of lowering UUG initiation in the presence of a different Sui⁻ mutation (the Ssu⁻ phenotype) were also obtained (13, 39). Previously, we identified Sui⁻ and Ssu⁻ mutations in the N-terminal domain of eIF3 subunit c/Nip1, which alter its contacts with eIF1, -2, and -5, suggesting that integrity of the MFC is important for the accuracy of AUG selection (49).Several genetic findings also implicate eIF3 in the efficiency of scanning and AUG recognition. The prt1-1 point mutation in b/Prt1 (S518F) (11) impairs translational control of GCN4 mRNA in a manner suggesting a reduced rate of scanning between the short uORFs involved in this control mechanism (30). Disrupting an interaction between a hydrophobic pocket of the noncanonical RNA recognition motif (RRM) in the N terminus of b/Prt1 (henceforth referred to as b/RRM) and a Trp residue in the N-terminal acidic motif of j/Hcr1 (Trp-37) severely reduces the efficiency of initiation at the AUG of uORF1 in GCN4 mRNA, the phenomenon of leaky scanning, implicating the connection between the b/RRM and j/Hcr1 NTD (henceforth referred to as j/NTD) in efficient AUG recognition (10). Similarly, a multiple Ala substitution in RNP1 of the b/RRM evoked leaky scanning of the AUG codon of GCN4 uORF1 (uAUG-1) (32).Interestingly, besides the b/RRM-j/NTD contact, the b/RRM can simultaneously bind to the j/Hcr1-like domain (HLD) in a/Tif32, and j/Hcr1 also independently binds a/Tif32 (50). This network of interactions involving the b/RRM, a/Tif32-HLD, and j/Hcr1 segments was shown to stabilize an eIF3 subassembly (50), referred to below as the b/RRM-j/Hcr1-a/Tif32-CTD module; however, it was not known whether the a/Tif32 HLD component of this module also participates in AUG recognition or other specific steps of initiation.In this report, we provide evidence that the evolutionarily conserved KERR motif in the a/Tif32 HLD (hereafter referred to as a/HLD) functions to enhance mRNA recruitment by 43S PICs, processivity of scanning, and the efficiency of AUG recognition. The identification of Ssu⁻ phenotypes for both KERR mutations and replacement of a nearby element (box6) further implicates the a/HLD in promoting the closed, scanning-arrested conformation of the PIC at start codons. Combining these results with our finding that the a/Tif32 CTD binds the 40S proteins Rps3 and Rps2 and the recent evidence that j/Hcr1 promotes AUG recognition and binds Rps2 leads us to propose that the a/HLD is positioned near the 40S mRNA entry channel, where it promotes mRNA binding and, together with j/Hcr1 and the b/RRM, modulates the transition between the open and closed conformations of the PIC during scanning and AUG recognition.     

Requirement of RNA Binding of Mammalian Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4GI (eIF4GI) for Efficient Interaction of eIF4E with the mRNA Cap

Eukaryotic mRNAs possess a 5′-terminal cap structure (cap), m⁷GpppN, which facilitates ribosome binding. The cap is bound by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), which is composed of eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4A. eIF4E is the cap-binding subunit, eIF4A is an RNA helicase, and eIF4G is a scaffolding protein that bridges between the mRNA and ribosome. eIF4G contains an RNA-binding domain, which was suggested to stimulate eIF4E interaction with the cap in mammals. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, however, such an effect was not observed. Here, we used recombinant proteins to reconstitute the cap binding of the mammalian eIF4E-eIF4GI complex to investigate the importance of the RNA-binding region of eIF4GI for cap interaction with eIF4E. We demonstrate that chemical cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity. Furthermore, the fusion of RNA recognition motif 1 (RRM1) of the La autoantigen to the N terminus of eIF4GI confers enhanced association between the cap structure and eIF4E. These results demonstrate that eIF4GI serves to anchor eIF4E to the mRNA and enhance its interaction with the cap structure.The cap structure, m⁷GpppN, is present at the 5′ terminus of all nuclear transcribed eukaryotic mRNAs. Cap-dependent binding of the ribosome to mRNA is mediated by the cap-binding protein eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), which forms a complex termed eIF4F together with eIF4G and eIF4A. Mammalian eIF4G, which has two isoforms, eIF4GI and eIF4GII, is a modular, multifunctional protein that binds to poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) (14) and eIF4E (18, 20) via the N-terminal third region. Mammalian eIF4G binds to eIF4A and eIF3 (15) via the middle third region and to eIF4A and Mnk protein kinase at the C-terminal region. eIF4GI also possesses an RNA-binding sequence (2, 9, 33) in the middle region. There are two RNA-binding sites on eIF4GI; one is located amino terminal to the first HEAT domain, and the other is located within the first HEAT domain (23). Mammalian and Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4E are similar in size (24 kDa), but mammalian eIF4GI (220 kDa) is larger than its yeast counterpart (150 kDa), as the latter lacks a C-terminal domain corresponding to mammalian eIF4GI (38).The affinity of eIF4E for the cap structure has been a matter of dispute for some time. The earlier works of Carberry et al. (4) and Ueda et al. (39) estimated the equilibrium dissociation constant (K_d) of the eIF4E-cap complex by fluorescence titration to be 2 × 10⁻⁶ to 5 × 10⁻⁶ M depending on the nature of the cap analog. Later on, development of a new methodology for the fluorescence titration experiments yielded K_d values of 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁸ (29, 41). The source of the difference with the previous reports was thoroughly analyzed (29, 30). The interaction between the cap structure and eIF4E is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI. This was first reported by showing that cross-linking of mammalian eIF4E to the cap structure is more efficient when it is a subunit of the eIF4F complex (19) or when it is complexed to eIF4GI (11). A similar enhancement of the binding of eIF4E to the cap structure was observed in yeast (40). However, two very different mechanisms were proposed to explain these observations. For the mammalian system, it was postulated that the middle segment of eIF4GI, which binds RNA, stabilizes the eIF4E interaction with the cap structure (11). This model was based primarily on the finding that in poliovirus-infected cells, eIF4GI is cleaved between its N-terminal third and the middle third, and consequently, eIF4E remains attached to the N-terminal eIF4GI fragment lacking the RNA-binding region. Under these conditions, cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure was poor (19, 31). In contrast, in yeast, a strong interaction between the cap structure and eIF4E was achieved using an eIF4G fragment containing the eIF4E-binding site that lacks the RNA-binding region (34, 40). Also, the yeast eIF4G fragment from amino acids 393 to 490 (fragment 393-490), which does not contain the RNA-binding site, forms a right-handed helical ring that wraps around the N terminus of eIF4E. This conformational change was suggested in turn to engender an allosteric enhancement of the association of eIF4E with the cap structure (10). Such an interaction between mammalian eIF4GI and eIF4E has not been reported.To understand the mechanism by which eIF4GI stimulates the interaction of eIF4E with the cap structure in mammals, we reconstituted the eIF4E-cap recognition activity in vitro with purified eIF4E and eIF4GI recombinant proteins. Using a chemical cross-linking assay, we demonstrate that only mammalian eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity enhance the cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure. Our data provide new insight into the mechanism of cap recognition by the eIF4E-eIF4GI complex.     

The Role of Nitric-oxide Synthase in the Regulation of UVB Light-induced Phosphorylation of the �� Subunit of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2

UV light induces phosphorylation of the α subunit of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) and inhibits global protein synthesis. Both eIF2 kinases, protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) and general control of nonderepressible protein kinase 2 (GCN2), have been shown to phosphorylate eIF2α in response to UV irradiation. However, the roles of PERK and GCN2 in UV-induced eIF2α phosphorylation are controversial. The one or more upstream signaling pathways that lead to the activation of PERK or GCN2 remain unknown. In this report we provide data showing that both PERK and GCN2 contribute to UV-induced eIF2α phosphorylation in human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. Reduction of expression of PERK or GCN2 by small interfering RNA decreases phosphorylation of eIF2α after UV irradiation. These data also show that nitric-oxide synthase (NOS)-mediated oxidative stress plays a role in regulation of eIF2α phosphorylation upon UV irradiation. Treating the cells with the broad NOS inhibitor N^G-methyl-l-arginine, the free radical scavenger N-acetyl-l-cysteine, or the NOS substrate l-arginine partially inhibits UV-induced eIF2α phosphorylation. The results presented above led us to propose that NOS mediates UV-induced eIF2α phosphorylation by activation of both PERK and GCN2 via oxidative stress and l-arginine starvation signaling pathways.UV irradiation inhibits translation initiation through activation of kinases that phosphorylate the α-subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α).² Two eIF2α kinases, double strand RNA-dependent protein kinase-like ER kinase (PERK) and general control of amino acid biosynthesis kinase (GCN2), are known to phosphorylate the serine 51 of eIF2α in response to UV irradiation (1–4). However, the one or more upstream pathways that activate eIF2α kinase(s) upon UV irradiation are not known. In this report, we provide evidence that UV-induced nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) activation and nitric oxide (NO^•) production regulate both PERK and GCN2 activation upon UVB irradiation.Expression of inducible nitric-oxide synthase in a mouse macrophage cell line leads to the phosphorylation of eIF2α and inhibition of translation (5). In cultured neuronal and pancreatic cell lines, production of NO^• and peroxynitrite (ONOO⁻) induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which activates PERK and results in cell dysfunction and apoptosis (6–9). Cytokine-stimulated inducible nitric-oxide synthase activation in astrocytes depletes l-arginine and activates GCN2, which phosphorylates eIF2α (10). UV irradiation also activates NOS and elevates cellular NO^• (11–13). However, the UV-induced NOS activation and NO^• production have never been shown to be related to the activation of eIF2α kinase(s). Now we demonstrate that UV-induced activation of NOS mediates the activation of both PERK and GCN2, which coordinately regulate the phosphorylation of eIF2α.