Differential contributions of AF-1 and AF-2 activities to the developmental functions of RXR alpha

We have engineered a mouse mutation that specifically deletes most of the RXR alpha N-terminal A/B region, which includes the activation function AF-1 and several phosphorylation sites. The homozygous mutants (RXR alpha af1(o)), as well as compound mutants that further lack RXR beta and RXR gamma, are viable and display a subset of the abnormalities previously described in RXR alpha-null mutants. In contrast, RXR alpha af1(o)/RAR(-/-)(alpha, beta or gamma) compound mutants die in utero and exhibit a large array of malformations that nearly recapitulate the full spectrum of the defects that characterize the fetal vitamin A-deficiency (VAD) syndrome. Altogether, these observations indicate that the RXR alpha AF-1 region A/B is functionally important, although less so than the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2, for efficiently transducing the retinoid signal through RAR/RXR alpha heterodimers during embryonic development. Moreover, it has a unique role in retinoic acid-dependent involution of the interdigital mesenchyme. During early placentogenesis, both the AF-1 and AF-2 activities of RXR alpha, beta and gamma appear to be dispensable, suggesting that RXRs act as silent heterodimeric partners in this process. However, AF-2 of RXR alpha, but not AF-1, is required for differentiation of labyrinthine trophoblast cells, a late step in the formation of the placental barrier.     

Phosphorylation of activation functions AF-1 and AF-2 of RAR alpha and RAR gamma is indispensable for differentiation of F9 cells upon retinoic acid and cAMP treatment.

The role of RAR alpha 1 and RAR gamma 2 AF-1 and AF-2 activation functions and of their phosphorylation was investigated during RA-induced primitive and parietal differentiation of F9 cells. We found that: (i) primitive endodermal differentiation requires RAR gamma 2, whereas parietal endodermal differentiation requires both RAR gamma 2 and RAR alpha 1, and in all cases AF-1 and AF-2 must synergize; (ii) primitive endodermal differentiation requires the proline-directed kinase site of RAR gamma 2-AF-1, whereas parietal endodermal differentiation additionally requires that of RAR alpha 1-AF-1; (iii) the cAMP-induced parietal endodermal differentiation also requires the protein kinase A site of RAR alpha-AF-2, but not that of RAR gamma; and (iv) the AF-1-AF-2 synergism and AF-1 phosphorylation site requirements for RA-responsive gene induction are promoter context-dependent. Thus, AF-1 and AF-2 of distinct RARs exert specific cellular and molecular functions in a cell-autonomous system mimicking physiological situations, and their phosphorylation by kinases belonging to two main signalling pathways is required to enable RARs to transduce the RA signal during F9 cell differentiation.     

Physical and functional interaction of the Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 transactivator with the retinoic acid receptors RAR alpha and RXR alpha.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, indicated by induction of EBV early antigens from latently infected lymphoid cell lines by phorbol esters, is inhibited by retinoic acid (RA). Viral reactivation, which is triggered by the immediate-early BZLF-1 (Z) viral gene product, is repressed by retinoic acid receptors (RARs) RAR alpha and RXR alpha. These proteins negatively regulate Z-mediated transactivation of the promoter for an EBV early gene product, early antigen-diffuse (EaD). Here we confirm a direct physical interaction between the AP1-like protein Z and RXR alpha and map the domains of interaction in the Z protein and RXR alpha. The domain required for homodimerization of Z is separate from that required for its interaction with RXR alpha. Z also has the effect of repressing activation of an RAR-responsive cellular promoter (BRE). Point mutants in the dimerization domain of Z unable to interact with RXR alpha do not repress RXR alpha-mediated transactivation of BRE, the promoter for RAR beta, which suggests that interaction between the two proteins is required for this repressor effect. The domain of RXR alpha required for interaction with Z has been mapped, and is again separate from that required for homodimerization. These results indicate that a 'cross-coupling' or direct interaction between Z and RAR alpha and RXR alpha can modulate the reactivation of latent EBV infection and suggest that, reciprocally, the viral protein Z may influence cellular regulatory pathways.     

The patterns of binding of RAR, RXR and TR homo- and heterodimers to direct repeats are dictated by the binding specificites of the DNA binding domains.

We show here that, in addition to generating an increase in DNA binding efficiency, heterodimerization of retinoid X receptor (RXR) with either retinoic acid receptor (RAR) or thyroid hormone receptor (TR) alters the binding site repertoires of RAR, RXR and TR homodimers. The binding site specificities of both homo- and heterodimers appear to be largely determined by their DNA binding domains (DBDs), and are dictated by (i) homocooperative DNA binding of the RXR DBD, (ii) heterocooperative DNA binding of RXR/RAR and RXR/TR DBDs, and (iii) steric hindrance. No homodimerization domain exists in the DBDs of TR and RAR. The dimerization function which is located in the ligand binding domain further stabilizes, but in general does not change, the repertoire dictated by the corresponding DBD(s). The binding repertoire can be further modified by the actual sequence of the binding site. We also provide evidence supporting the view that the cooperative binding of the RXR/RAR and RXR/TR DBDs to directly repeated elements is anisotropic, with interactions between the dimerization interfaces occurring only with RXR bound to the 5' located motif. This polarity, which appears to be maintained in the full-length receptor heterodimers, may constitute a novel parameter in promoter-specific transactivation.     

Retinoic acid receptor isoform RAR gamma 1: an antagonist of the transactivation of the RAR beta RARE in epithelial cell lines and normal human keratinocytes.

The diversity of isoforms of retinoic acid (RA) receptors (RARs) and of DNA sequences of retinoic acid-responsive elements (RAREs) suggests the existence of selectivities in the RAR/RARE recognition or in the subsequent gene modulation. Such selectivities might be particularly important for RAREs involved in positive feedback, eg. the RAR beta RARE. In the present work we found that in several epithelial cell lines, reporter constructs containing the RAR beta RARE linked to the HSV-tk promoter were transactivated in the presence of RA by endogenous RARs and co-transfected RAR alpha 1 and RAR beta 2 isoforms, but not by RAR gamam 1. On the contrary, this latter isoform behaved towards the RAR beta RARE as an inhibitor of the transactivation produced by endogenous RARs and by cotransfected RAR alpha 1 and RAR beta 2. RAR gamma 1 also behaved as an antagonist of the transactivation produced by cotransfected RXR alpha. The natural RAR beta gene promoter or RAR beta RARE tk constructs were not activated by the endogenous receptors of normal human keratinocytes (NHK), which are known to contain predominantly RAR gamma 1. It was, however, possible to activate to a certain extent RAR beta RARE-reporter constructs in NHK by co-transfecting RAR alpha 1, RAR beta 2 or RXR alpha. The antagonist behavior of RAR gamma 1 towards the RAR beta RARE may explain why in certain cell types such as keratinocytes, RAR beta is neither expressed nor induced by RA.     

The dimerization interfaces formed between the DNA binding domains of RXR, RAR and TR determine the binding specificity and polarity of the full-length receptors to direct repeats.

Heterodimers of retinoid X receptor (RXR) and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) bind preferentially to directly repeated elements with spacing of two (DR2) or five (DR5) base pairs, due to the specific heterocooperative interaction of their DNA binding domains (DBDs) on these elements. We have demonstrated in the accompanying paper that the heterodimeric DBD interface that is responsible for the cooperative binding to DR5 elements, specifically involves the D-box of the RXR CII finger and the tip of the RAR CI finger. We show here that a second type of dimerization interface, which specifically implicates the RAR T-box and the RXR CII finger to the exclusion of the D-box, determines the selective binding to DR2 elements. Interestingly, the same type of dimerization interface (RXR T-box and CII finger) is responsible for the cooperative binding of homodimers of the RXR DBD to DR1 elements. Based on the three-dimensional structure of the glucocorticoid receptor DBD, modeling of RXR/RAR, RXR/TR and RXR/RXR DBD cooperative interactions predicts that in all cases the DBD contributing the CII finger, i.e. that of RXR, has to be positioned 5' to its cooperatively bound partner. This binding polarity of the DBDs is conferred upon the full-length receptors, since crosslinking experiments indicate that RXR is always 5' to RAR in complexes between either DR5 or DR2 and RXR/RAR heterodimers. The possible significance of these observations for transactivation by retinoic acid receptors is discussed.     

Novel roles of retinoid X receptor (RXR) and RXR ligand in dynamically modulating the activity of the thyroid hormone receptor/RXR heterodimer

Many members of the type II nuclear receptor subfamily function as heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR). A permissive heterodimer (e.g. peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor/RXR) allows for ligand binding by both partners of the receptor complex. In contrast, RXR has been thought to be incapable of ligand binding in a nonpermissive heterodimer, such as that of thyroid hormone receptor (TR)/RXR, where it has been referred to as a silent partner. However, we recently presented functional evidence suggesting that RXR in the TR/RXR heterodimer can bind its natural ligand 9-cis-RA in cells. Here we extended our study of the interrelationship of TR and RXR. We examined the potential modulatory effect of RXR and its ligand on the activity of TR, primarily using a Gal4-TR chimera. This study led to several novel and unexpected findings: 1) heterodimerization of apo-RXRalpha (in the absence of 9-cis-RA) with Gal4-TR inhibits T3-mediated transactivation; 2) the inhibition of Gal4-TR activity by RXRalpha is further enhanced by 9-cis-RA; 3) two different RXR subtypes (alpha and beta) differentially modulate the activity of Gal4-TR; 4) the N-terminal A/B domains of RXR alpha and beta are largely responsible for their differential modulation of TR activity; and 5) the RXR ligand 9-cis-RA appears to differentially affect T3-mediated transactivation from the Gal4-TR/RXRalpha (which is inhibited by 9-cis-RA) and TRE-bound TR/RXRalpha (which is further activated by 9-cis-RA) heterodimers. Taken together, these results further support our recent proposal that the RXR component in a TR/RXR heterodimer is not silent and, more importantly, reveal novel aspects of regulation of the activity of the TR/RXR heterodimer by RXR and RXR ligand.