Folding and binding: Protein–nucleic acid interactions: Web alert

A selection of World Wide Web sites relevant to papers published in this issue of Current Opinion in Structural Biology.     

Protein–nucleic acid thermodynamic databases for specific uses

In response to Gromiha and Harini, we review the currently available thermodynamic databases for protein–nucleic acid interactions. These databases are designed for particular uses. We give general comments on them to facilitate browsing and exploration.     

Thermodynamic database supports deciphering protein–nucleic acid interactions

The thermodynamics of protein–nucleic acid interactions (PNIs) is crucial for elucidating the mechanisms of molecular recognition and pathological consequences. The Protein–Nucleic Acid Thermodynamics Database (PNATDB) is a database containing experimentally determined thermodynamic parameters along with sequence, structural, and function data, which is available free online.     

Comment on ‘Thermodynamic database supports deciphering protein–nucleic acid interactions’

Mei and colleagues reported a thermodynamic database, PNATDB for protein-nucleic acid interactions, which contains 12 635 experimentally determined thermodynamic parameters. They claimed that extracting data from existing databases is difficult. ProNAB, which has more than 20 000 experimental data points for binding affinities of protein–nucleic acid complexes and other information, was not discussed.     

Do electrostatic interactions destabilize protein–nucleic acid binding?

The negatively charged phosphates of nucleic acids are often paired with positively charged residues upon binding proteins. It was thus counter-intuitive when previous Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) calculations gave positive energies from electrostatic interactions, meaning that they destabilize protein-nucleic acid binding. Our own PB calculations on protein-protein binding have shown that the sign and the magnitude of the electrostatic component are sensitive to the specification of the dielectric boundary in PB calculations. A popular choice for the boundary between the solute low dielectric and the solvent high dielectric is the molecular surface; an alternative is the van der Waals (vdW) surface. In line with results for protein-protein binding, in this article, we found that PB calculations with the molecular surface gave positive electrostatic interaction energies for two protein-RNA complexes, but the signs are reversed when the vdW surface was used. Therefore, whether destabilizing or stabilizing effects are predicted depends on the choice of the dielectric boundary. The two calculation protocols, however, yielded similar salt effects on the binding affinity. Effects of charge mutations differentiated the two calculation protocols; PB calculations with the vdW surface had smaller deviations overall from experimental data.     

Protein–protein interactions within peroxiredoxin systems

Peroxiredoxin systems in plants were demonstrated involved in crucial roles related to reactive oxygenated species (ROS) metabolism and the linked cell signalling to ROS. Peroxiredoxins function as peroxidasic systems that combine at least a reactivating reductant agent like thioredoxins, and sometimes glutaredoxins and glutathion. In the past three years a number of peroxiredoxin structures were solved by crystallography in different experimental crystallisation conditions. The structures have revealed a significant propensity of peroxiredoxins for oligomerism that was confirmed by biophysical studies in solution using NMR and other methods as analytical ultra-centrifugation. These studies showed that quaternary structures of peroxiredoxins involve specific protein–protein interaction interfaces that rely upon the peroxiredoxin types and/or their redox conditions. The protein–protein interactions with the reactivating redoxins essentially lead to transient unstable complexes. We review herein the different protein–protein interactions characterized or deduced from those reports.VNM is recipient of a PhD fellowship of the French Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur de la Recherche et des Nouvelles Technologies for the year 2003–2006 and the Research Doctorate School of Chemistry of Lyon.     

Peptide nucleic acid probe for protein affinity purification based on biotin–streptavidin interaction and peptide nucleic acid strand hybridization

We describe a new method for protein affinity purification that capitalizes on the high affinity of streptavidin for biotin but does not require dissociation of the biotin–streptavidin complex for protein retrieval. Conventional reagents place both the selectively reacting group (the “warhead”) and the biotin on the same molecule. We place the warhead and the biotin on separate molecules, each linked to a short strand of peptide nucleic acid (PNA), synthetic polymers that use the same bases as DNA but attached to a backbone that is resistant to attack by proteases and nucleases. As in DNA, PNA strands with complementary base sequences hybridize. In conditions that favor PNA duplex formation, the warhead strand (carrying the tagged protein) and the biotin strand form a complex that is held onto immobilized streptavidin. As in DNA, the PNA duplex dissociates at moderately elevated temperature; therefore, retrieval of the tagged protein is accomplished by a brief exposure to heat. Using iodoacetate as the warhead, 8-base PNA strands, biotin, and streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, we demonstrate retrieval of the cysteine protease papain. We were also able to use our iodoacetyl–PNA:PNA–biotin probe for retrieval and identification of a thiol reductase and a glutathione transferase from soybean seedling cotyledons.     

Insight on the interaction of polychlorobiphenyl with nucleic acid–base

The interaction between one polychlorobiphenyl (3,3′,4,4′,-tetrachlorobiphenyl, coded PCB77) and the four DNA nucleic acid–base is studied by means of quantum mechanics calculations in stacked conformations. It is shown that even if the intermolecular dispersion energy is the largest component of the total interaction energy, some other contributions play a non negligible role. In particular the electrostatic dipole-dipole interaction and the charge transfer from the nucleobase to the PCB are responsible for the relative orientation of the monomers in the complexes. In addition, the charge transfer tends to flatten the PCB, which could therefore intercalate more easily between DNA base pairs. From these seminal results, we predict that PCB could intercalate completely between two base pairs, preferably between Guanine:Cytosine pairs.

Fatty acid–genotype interactions and cardiovascular risk

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and rate of progression is determined by genetic, environmental and behavioural factors. Majority of genotype–diet–CVD phenotype research till date has focussed on the interactive impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and dietary fat composition, on blood lipids levels, with strong evidence of the existence of hypo- and hyper-responders. However, a recognised concern in the field of nutrigenetics is a lack of consistency between findings of different studies. This apparent lack of consistency is likely to be attributable to the impact of factors such as ethnicity and gender on the ‘size’ of nutrigenetic interactions, a clear understanding of which needs to be gained. Although not yet ready for widespread use, in the future a greater use of genetic profiling is likely to enhance current strategies of CVD prediction, and improve the design of more personalised approaches to minimise risk in the individual.