Protein folding mechanisms and the multidimensional folding funnel

An important idea that emerges from the energy landscape theory of protein folding is that subtle global features of the protein landscape can profoundly affect the apparent mechanism of folding. The relationship between various characteristic temperatures in the phase diagrams and landmarks in the folding funnel at fixed temperatures can be used to classify different folding behaviors. The one-dimensional picture of a folding funnel classifies folding kinetics into four basic scenarios, depending on the relative location of the thermodynamic barrier and the glass transition as a function of a single-order parameter. However, the folding mechanism may not always be quantitatively described by a single-order parameter. Several other order parameters, such as degree of secondary structure formation, collapse and topological order, are needed to establish the connection between minimalist models and proteins in the laboratory. In this article we describe a simple multidimensional funnel based on two-order parameters that measure the degree of collapse and topological order. The appearance of several different “mechanisms” is illustrated by analyzing lattice models with different potentials and sequences with different degrees of design. In most cases, the two-dimensional analysis leads to a classification of mechanisms totally in keeping with the one-dimensional scheme, but a topologically distinct scenario of fast folding with traps also emerges. The nature of traps depends on the relative location of the glass transition surface and the thermodynamic barrier in the multidimensional funnel. Proteins 32:136–158, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Protein folding

The importance of protein folding in the biosynthesis of proteins is reviewed.     

Co-translational folding

Nascent proteins appear to fold co-translationally. The ribosome itself may function as a chaperone, providing a sheltered environment in which the nascent peptide is protected from aggregation and degradation, and in which folding into the tertiary structure is facilitated by interactions both with ribosomal proteins and with specific segments of the ribosomal RNA.     

Protein folding

The problem of protein folding is that how proteins acquire their native unique three‐dimensional structure in the physiological milieu. To solve the problem, the following key questions should be answered: do proteins fold co‐ or post‐translationally, i.e. during or after biosynthesis, what is the mechanism of protein folding, and what is the explanation for fast folding of proteins? The two first questions are discussed in the current review. The general lines are to show that the opinion, that proteins fold after they are synthesized is hardly substantiated and suitable for solving the problem of protein folding and why proteins should fold cotranslationally. A possible tentative model for the mechanism of protein folding is also suggested. To this end, a thorough analysis is made of the biosynthesis, delivery to the folding compartments, and the rates of the biosynthesis, translocation and folding of proteins. A cursory attention is assigned to the role of GroEL/ES‐like chaperonins in protein folding.     

Single-molecule folding

Recent developments in fluorescence and force spectroscopy enable us to go beyond the ensemble average and measure the behavior of individual biomacromolecules. These single-molecule approaches can directly resolve transient intermediate states and multiple reaction pathways, and thus are uniquely powerful in characterizing the complex dynamics of biological processes. Recent applications of these two techniques to the protein and RNA folding problems have led to exciting new results.     

Protein folding in the cell: reshaping the folding funnel

Models of protein folding have historically focused on a subset of 'well-behaved' proteins that can be successfully refolded from denaturants in vitro. Energy landscapes, including folding funnel 'cartoons', describe the largely uncomplicated folding of these isolated chains at infinite dilution. However, the frequent failure of many polypeptides to fold to their native state requires more comprehensive models of folding to accommodate the crucial role of interactions between partially folded intermediates. By incorporating additional deep minima, which reflect off-pathway interchain interactions, the folding funnel concept can be extended to describe the behavior of a more diverse set of proteins under more physiologically relevant conditions. In particular, the effects of ribosomes (translation), molecular chaperones and other aspects of the cellular environment on early chain conformations can be included to account for the folding behavior of polypeptide chains in cells.     

Changes of protein stiffness during folding detect protein folding intermediates

Single-molecule force-quench atomic force microscopy (FQ-AFM) is used to detect folding intermediates of a simple protein by detecting changes of molecular stiffness of the protein during its folding process. Those stiffness changes are obtained from shape and peaks of an autocorrelation of fluctuations in end-to-end length of the folding molecule. The results are supported by predictions of the equipartition theorem and agree with existing Langevin dynamics simulations of a simplified model of a protein folding. In the light of the Langevin simulations the experimental data probe an ensemble of random-coiled collapsed states of the protein, which are present both in the force-quench and thermal-quench folding pathways.     

Cotranslational protein folding

The review analyzes the research concerning the folding of proteins in the course of their synthesis on ribosomes. The experimental data obtained for various proteins using various methods give grounds for concluding that a nascent protein largely acquires its spatial structure while still attached to the ribosome, and final folding into the biologically active conformation takes place as soon as the completed protein is released therefrom. Cotranslational folding is characteristic of both bacterial and eukaryotic cells, and appears to be the universal and the most evolutionarily ancient mechanism.     

Illuminating folding intermediates

Time-resolved Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy provides evidence of non-native antiparallel beta-sheet structural elements in the folding intermediates of alpha-lactalbumin.     

Sub-microsecond protein folding

We have investigated the structure, equilibria, and folding kinetics of an engineered 35-residue subdomain of the chicken villin headpiece, an ultrafast-folding protein. Substitution of two buried lysine residues by norleucine residues stabilizes the protein by 1 kcal/mol and increases the folding rate sixfold, as measured by nanosecond laser T-jump. The folding rate at 300 K is (0.7 micros)(-1) with little or no temperature dependence, making this protein the first sub-microsecond folder, with a rate only twofold slower than the theoretically predicted speed limit. Using the 70 ns process to obtain the effective diffusion coefficient, the free energy barrier height is estimated from Kramers theory to be less than approximately 1 kcal/mol. X-ray crystallographic determination at 1A resolution shows no significant change in structure compared to the single-norleucine-substituted molecule and suggests that the increased stability is electrostatic in origin. The ultrafast folding rate, very accurate X-ray structure, and small size make this engineered villin subdomain an ideal system for simulation by atomistic molecular dynamics with explicit solvent.     

Zinc-dependent protein folding

Studies of classic zinc-finger peptides over the past 15 years have offered insights into the coupled processes of metal binding and protein folding. Within the past two years, this insight has been used to increase our understanding of the importance of first and second shell contributions (i.e. contributions from direct and indirect metal ligands) to metal binding and protein-folding stability, and led to advances in de novo protein design and protein redesign.     

Protein folding forces

We investigate the average inter-residue folding forces derived from mutational data of the 15 proteins: barstar, barnase, chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2), Src SH3 domain, spectrin R16 domain, Arc repressor, apo-azurin, cold shock protein B (cspB), C-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L9 (CTL9), FKBP12, α-lactalbumin, colicin E7 immunity protein 7 (IM7), colicin E9 immunity protein 9 (IM9), spectrin R17 domain, and ubiquitin. The residue-specific contributions to folding in most of the 15 protein molecules are highly non-uniformly distributed and are typically about 1 piconewton (pN) per interaction. The strongest folding forces often occur in some of the helices and strands of folding nuclei which suggests that folding nucleation−condensation is partially directed by formation of some secondary structure interactions. The correlation of the energy changes of mutants with inter-residue contact maps of the protein molecules provides a higher resolution than assigning the mutant data to certain positions in the polypeptide strand alone. In contrast to previous Φ-value analysis, we now can partially resolve folding motions. Compaction of at least one α-helix along its axis mediated by internal hydrogen bonds and stabilized by diffuse tertiary structure interactions appears to be one important molecular event during early folding in barstar, CI2, spectrin R16 domain, Arc repressor, α-lactalbumin, IM7, IM9, and spectrin R17 domain. A lateral movement of at least two strands neighbored in sequence towards each other appears to be involved in early folding of the SH3 domain, cspB, CTL9, and FKBP12.