Sugar preferences of some southern African nectarivorous birds

Three southern African nectarivorous passerine birds, Gurney's Sugarbird Promerops gur-neyi , the Malachite Sunbird Nectarinia famosa and the Black Sunbird Nectarinia amethystina , were tested to determine their hexose and sucrose preferences. All three species preferred sucrose when offered a choice of 0.25 M solutions of glucose, fructose and sucrose. However, when the concentrations were increased to 0.73 M, the three species showed no preference for any of the three sugars. The choice made at low concentrations (equivalent to the lower limit of the range of nectar concentrations of preferred nectar-producing plants) may reflect preference for the sugar with the highest energy reward. We also examined the proposition that birds offered a choice of different concentrations of one sugar would show ranked preferences and maximize their rate of energy return by selectivity. In contrast to expectations, Gurney's Sugarbird and the Malachite Sunbird showed no preference for the highest concentrations. We suggest that dietary choices in these species indicate the birds had either reached a limit where they had sufficient energy intake or were affected by post-ingestion constraints.     

Nectar concentration preferences and sugar intake in the white-bellied sunbird, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Cinnyris talatala</Emphasis> (Nectariniidae)

Plant nectar is a simple food consumed by many different animals. Preferences regarding its components, especially sugars, have been studied for many species, but the preferences of nectar-feeding birds for different sugar concentrations are less well known than their sugar type preferences. The concentration preferences of white-bellied sunbirds, Cinnyris talatala, were examined using paired solutions of either sucrose or equicaloric 1:1 mixtures of glucose and fructose. Preferences were tested over a broad concentration range of 0.25–2.5 M sucrose equivalents (using 0.25 or 0.5 M differences between pairs). On both sucrose and hexose diets, the higher concentration was preferred up to 1 M, but there were no significant preferences above this concentration, except that birds preferred 1.5 to 2 M sucrose. As with other nectar-feeding vertebrates, the laboratory preferences of sunbirds do not explain the low concentration of their natural nectars. We recorded apparent excess sugar consumption during 6 h preference tests involving concentrated hexose diets; this could be due to digestive constraints or viscosity differences between sucrose and hexose solutions.     

Sugar preferences and digestive efficiency in an opportunistic avian nectarivore, the Dark-capped Bulbul Pycnonotus tricolor

It has recently been recognized that flowers pollinated by generalist opportunistic nectarivores tend to have different nectar properties to those pollinated by specialist nectarivores (including both hummingbirds and specialist passerines). While renewed interest in specialist avian nectarivore sugar preferences and digestive physiology has helped explain the concentrated sucrose-dominated nectar of plants they feed on, there has been little progress in understanding why generalist or occasional nectar-feeding birds tend to be associated with flowers that have dilute hexose-dominated nectar. We examined sugar preferences and assimilation efficiencies over a range of concentrations, and concentration preferences, in Dark-capped Bulbuls Pycnonotus tricolor, one of the more common occasional avian nectarivores in southern Africa. Dark-capped Bulbuls showed significant preference for hexose sugar solutions, irrespective of concentration, when given a choice between hexose and sucrose solutions in equicaloric pair-wise choice tests conducted at five different concentrations (5–25%). This contrasts with results from specialist nectarivore groups which generally show a significant concentration-dependant switch in preference from hexose at low concentrations to sucrose at high concentrations for equicaloric solutions. In addition, Dark-capped Bulbuls showed an unusual lack of preference for solutions of higher sugar concentration when simultaneously offered four solutions varying in concentration from 10 to 25%. Dark-capped bulbuls also showed a unique effect of concentration on sugar assimilation efficiency, assimilating relatively more energy on 5% diets than on 25% diets. Although able to assimilate sucrose effectively, assimilation rates of hexose sugars were marginally higher. These results shed new light on pollination systems involving occasional nectarivores and, in particular, help to explain the prevalence of low concentration hexose-dominated nectars in flowers pollinated by these birds.     

Sugar Preferences in Nectar‐ and Fruit‐Eating Birds: Behavioral Patterns and Physiological Causes1

Sucrose, glucose, and fructose are the three sugars that commonly occur in floral nectar and fruit pulp. The relative proportions of these three sugars in nectar and fruit in relation to the sugar preferences of pollinators and seed dispersers have received considerable attention. Based on the research of Herbert and Irene Baker and their collaborators, a dichotomy between sucrose‐dominant hummingbird‐pollinated flowers and hexose‐dominant passerine flowers and fruits was proposed. Data on sugar preferences of several hummingbird species (which prefer sucrose) vs. a smaller sample of passerines (which prefer hexoses) neatly fitted this apparent dichotomy. This hummingbird–passerine dichotomy was strongly emphasized until the discovery of South African plants with sucrose‐dominant nectars, which are pollinated by passerines that are able to digest, and prefer sucrose. Now we know that, with the exception of two clades, most passerines are able to assimilate sucrose. Most sugar preference studies have been conducted using a single, relatively high, sugar concentration in the nectar (ca 20%). Thus, we lack information about the role that sugar concentration might play in sugar selection. Because many digestive traits are strongly affected not only by sugar composition, but also by sugar concentration, we suggest that preferences for different sugar compositions are concentration‐dependent. Indeed, recent studies on several unrelated nectar‐feeding birds have found a distinct switch from hexose preference at low concentrations to sucrose preference at higher concentrations. Finally, we present some hypotheses about the role that birds could have played in molding the sugar composition of plant rewards.     

The sweet side of life: nectar sugar type and concentration preference in Wahlberg's epauletted fruit bat

Whether nectarivores or frugivores place selective pressure on the plants they feed on, in terms of nectar or fruit traits, is much debated. Globally sugar preferences, concentration preference and digestive ability of avian nectarivores have been extensively researched. In contrast, relatively little is known about mammalian nectarivores or frugivores in terms of these, particularly Old World species. Consequently effect of sugar type and concentration on food preference in Wahlberg's epauletted fruit bat Epomophorus wahlbergi was investigated. Pair-wise choice tests were conducted using equicaloric hexose and sucrose solutions at five different concentrations (5%-25%). It was expected that they would prefer hexose sugars as these are dominant in available indigenous fruits. However, bats preferred hexoses only when offered dilute (5%) concentrations. From 10% to 25% they showed a decrease in volume intake. Their body mass was generally higher and similar after feeding during the night with the exception of 5% concentration where the mean body mass decreased. When E. wahlbergi were offered a range of sucrose or hexose solutions (10%-25%) respectively, they showed no concentration preference in terms of total volume consumed, nor energy intake. These findings suggest that these fruit bats do not appear to act as a selective pressure on sugar composition in Old World fruit. In fruit bats with high energy requirements, dietary flexibility may be an advantage when faced with seasonal and unpredictable fruit availability.     

Sugar preferences, absorption efficiency and water influx in a Neotropical nectarivorous passerine, the Bananaquit (Coereba flaveola)

Nectarivory has evolved repeatedly in a number of unrelated bird taxa throughout the world and nectar feeding birds, regardless of their taxonomic affiliation, display convergent foraging and food processing adaptations that allow them to subsist on weak sugar solutions. However, phylogeny influences sugar type preferences of nectarivores. We investigated sugar preferences, assimilation efficiency and water flux in a Neotropical honeycreeper, the Bananaquit (Coereba flaveola; Coerebidae), a member of a radiation of tanagers and finches. Bananaquits showed no preference for nearly equicaloric (25% w/v) sucrose, glucose, fructose or glucose-fructose mixtures in pair-wise choice tests. In agreement with this lack of preference, they were equally efficient at absorbing sucrose and both hexoses. Apparent assimilation efficiency of these sugars was around 97.5%. In pair-wise tests, Bananaquits displayed a strong preference for the most concentrated sucrose solution when the lowest concentration ranged from 276 to 522 mM. Between 522 and 1120 mM sucrose solution concentrations, Bananaquits were able to adjust their volumetric food intake in order to maintain a constant energy intake. At solution concentration of 276 mM, birds could not maintain their rate of energy intake by increasing food consumption enough. We consider that at low sugar concentrations, Bananaquits faced a physiological constraint; they were unable to process food at a fast enough rate to meet their energy needs. We also explored the possibility that dilute nectars might be essential to sustain high water needs of Bananaquits by allowing them to control osmolarity of the food. Between 276 and 1120 mM sucrose solution concentrations, average amount of free water drunk by Bananaquits was independent of food concentration. They drank very little supplementary water and did not effectively dilute concentrated nectars. The evidence suggests that water bulk of dilute nectars is a burden to Bananaquits.     

Nectar sugar composition of European Caryophylloideae (Caryophyllaceae) in relation to flower length,pollination biology and phylogeny

Floral nectar composition has been explained as an adaptation to factors that are either directly or indirectly related to pollinator attraction. However, it is often unclear whether the sugar composition is a direct adaptation to pollinator preferences. Firstly, the lower osmolality of sucrose solutions means that they evaporate more rapidly than hexose solutions, which might be one reason why sucrose‐rich nectar is typically found in flowers with long tubes (adapted to long‐tongued pollinators), where it is better protected from evaporation than in open or short‐tubed flowers. Secondly, it can be assumed that temperature‐dependent evaporation is generally lower during the night than during the day so that selection pressure to secrete nectar with high osmolality (i.e. hexose‐rich solutions) is relaxed for night‐active flowers pollinated at night. Thirdly, the breeding system may affect selection pressure on nectar traits; that is, for pollinator‐independent, self‐pollinated plants, a lower selective pressure on nectar traits can be assumed, leading to a higher variability of nectar sugar composition independent of pollinator preferences, nectar accessibility and nectar protection. To analyse the relations between flower tube length, day vs. night pollination and self‐pollination, the nectar sugar composition was investigated in 78 European Caryophylloideae (Caryophyllaceae) with different pollination modes (diurnal, nocturnal, self‐pollination) using high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). All Caryophylleae species (Dianthus and relatives) were found to have nectar with more than 50% sucrose, whereas the sugar composition of Sileneae species (Silene and relatives) ranged from 0% to 98.2%. In the genus Silene, a clear dichotomous distribution of sucrose‐ and hexose‐dominant nectars is evident. We found a positive correlation between the flower tube length and sucrose content in Caryophylloideae, particularly in day‐flowering species, using both conventional analyses and phylogenetically independent contrasts.     

Sugar preferences and xylose metabolism of a mammal pollinator, the Namaqua rock mouse (Aethomys namaquensis).

The sugar preferences of 10 Namaqua rock mice, Aethomys namaquensis, were assessed using pairwise combinations of 30% (w/w) solutions of sucrose, glucose, fructose, xylose, and a mixture of equal parts of glucose and fructose. The tests were designed to control for side biases that were apparent in preliminary experiments. The mice preferred sucrose to fructose and glucose. Xylose, although the least preferred sugar, was willingly consumed by the rodents (up to 5.8 mL in 24 h). This contrasts with the strong rejection of xylose by nectarivorous birds on which similar preference tests were performed. The efficiency of xylose absorption and metabolism by A. namaquensis was investigated by measuring dietary intake, blood xylose levels, and urinary and fecal xylose output. Again in contrast to the birds, the apparent absorption efficiency of xylose was found to be very high at 97%, but exactly how the xylose is metabolized requires further study. Xylose is thought to be only slowly metabolized by mammals, and it is possible that intestinal bacteria may serve this purpose, like the ruminal bacteria that break down xylans in plant tissue.     

Do hummingbirds have a sweet-tooth? Gustatory sugar thresholds and sugar selection in the broad-billed hummingbird Cynanthus latirostris

Nectar is a solution of mainly three sugars: sucrose, glucose and fructose. Studies have demonstrated that pollinators have preferences according to the sugar composition presented in their diet, and these preferences may be caused by sugar assimilation capacities. However, sugar flavor could also play an important role for sugar preferences of nectar-feeding animals. We evaluated the sugar gustatory thresholds of the broad-billed hummingbird Cynanthus latirostris for sucrose, glucose, fructose and a 1:1 mixture of glucose-fructose. We presented eight C. latirostris to paired feeders containing either a sugar solution or pure water. Additionally, we conducted sugar preference tests at three different concentrations (146, 730 and 1022 mmol L^− 1), to relate sugar preferences with sugar gustatory thresholds. C. latirostris had different gustatory thresholds for the three different sugars tested. At low sugar concentrations (146 mmol L^− 1), sugar selection followed the gustatory thresholds. Hummingbird sugar preference patterns can be affected by different mechanisms, both pre- and post-ingestive. At low concentrations gustatory thresholds may play an important role to determine sugar selection. However, at intermediate and high concentrations, sugar assimilation rates, and velocity of food processing generated by osmotic constraints, can be the mechanisms that explain the sugar selection of these animals.     

Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions

C57BL/6J (B6) mice consume more sugar and fat solutions than do 129 mice in 24-h preference tests. Previous studies have attributed this observation to strain differences in taste responsiveness to these nutrients. We tested the hypothesis that differences in postingestive responsiveness contribute to the strain differences. In experiment 1, B6 and 129 mice were trained to associate consumption of a flavored solution (CS+) with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% sucrose and a different flavored solution (CS-) with IG water infusions (22 h/day). They were then retrained with new flavors paired with IG infusions of 5.6% soybean oil and water. Although both strains developed preferences for the nutrient-paired CS+ solutions, the B6 mice displayed significantly stronger preferences. The B6 mice consumed more CS+ during training, which may have contributed to their enhanced preference. In a second experiment, training intakes were equated by giving B6 and 129 mice "isosweet" CS solutions prepared with different amounts of sucrose and saccharin. The B6 and 129 mice consumed more of the sugar- or fat-paired CS+ than the water-paired CS- during training. The two strains also displayed equally strong preferences for the CS+ over CS- in choice tests, indicating that they had similar postingestive responsiveness to the sucrose and soybean oil. We propose that B6 mice consume more sugar and fat than 129 mice because their stronger orosensory response stimulates greater intake, which leads to greater stimulation of postingestive nutrient detectors and further enhancement of consumption.     

Metabolism of Radioactive Sugars by Tobacco leaf Disks

Destarched tobacco-leaf disks were floated on per cent. (w/v)solutions of sucrose uniformly labelled with ¹⁴C in either theglucose or fructose moiety, and on invert sugar in which onehexose only was so labelled. The experiments were carried outin an atmosphere of oxygen at 25° C. Seventy-five per cent,of the sugar lost from the external solutions was recoveredas starch, sucrose, fructose, glucose, and CO₂. With sucroseas the substrate, 30 per cent, of the material was recoveredas CO₂ and 17 per cent. each as starch, sucrose, fructose, andglucose. With invert sugar as the substrate, 30 per cent, wasagain recovered as CO₂ only 20 per cent. as the three sugarstogether, and 50 per cent. as starch. Whichever hexose was initiallylabelled and whether the sugar was supplied as sucrose or hexose,the relative specific activities of starch and sucrose in theleaf disks and of the CO₂ evolved were equal or nearly equalto that of the sugar supplied. With sucrose as the substratethe sucrose in the disks retained its asymmetry of label, andfree hexoses produced were similarly asymmetrically labelled.When invert sugar was the substrate the sucrose synthesizedwas strongly labelled in both moieties, as also were the freehexosea. It is concluded that fructose and glucose free or combinedin sucrose were equally available for starch synthesis and CO₂,formation, and that there can be no question of preferentialutilization of one or other hexose. Starch and CO₂ must arisefrom a common source in which readily formed derivatives ofthe hexoses are rapidly equilibrated. Free hexose cannot participatedirectly in either sucrose or starch synthesis. Accumulationof sugar not immediately metabolized and inversion of sucrosetake place at a site remote from the common pool. A scheme toaccommodate the results is discussed.     

Preferences for nectar sugars in the peacock butterfly, Inachis io

1. Peacock butterflies, Inachis io , were tested experimentally for their preferences for nectar sugars.
2. In tests with different plain sugar solutions (25%, weight to total weight) the butterflies strongly preferred sucrose and fructose over glucose. They also preferred sucrose over fructose.
3. In tests with mixed sugar solutions the butterflies clearly preferred both sucrose-dominant (sucrose : hexoses = 5 : 1) and balanced sugar solutions (sucrose : glucose : fructose = 1 : 1 : 1) over hexose-dominant sugar solutions (sucrose : hexoses = 1 : 5).
4. Females consumed significantly more of the balanced sugar solution than did males.
5. These results are discussed with respect to previous experiments on nectar preferences of butterflies, nectar sugar composition of butterfly-pollinated flowers, and flower preferences, physiological and reproductive aspects of butterflies.     

Nectar to improve parasitoid fitness in biological control: Does the sucrose:hexose ratio matter?

The consumption of saccharide-rich foods such as floral nectar is crucial for the survival of many adult parasitoid wasps. The importance to parasitoids of nectar quality, with regards to its sucrose:hexose ratio, was investigated. Nectar, an aqueous solution of sugars, amino acids and other compounds, differs between plant species. Nectar composition is dominated by sucrose, glucose and fructose. Previous studies have shown that the ratio of sucrose to hexose (glucose+fructose) sugars can explain nectar associations in a range of flower visiting arthropods. It has been suggested that this ratio may be important in terms of parasitoid fitness. Analysis of floral nectar from fourteen plant species confirmed that the sucrose/hexose ratio significantly differed between species. An opportunity to select floral resources based on this measure of nectar quality arose and highlighted the potential to utilize native flowering plant species in place of the seven most commonly deployed, which are usually not native to the countries in which they are used.Results presented in this paper indicate, however, that the sucrose/hexose ratio is not a significant factor explaining parasitoid longevity. The hymenopteran parasitoids Diadegma semiclausum (Ichneumonidae) and Dolichogenidea tasmanica (Braconidae) were fed 40% w/w sugar solutions, differing in their sugar ratios. Solutions were classified as either sucrose-dominant (ratio >0.99), sucrose-rich (ratio 0.5–0.99), hexose-rich (ratio 0.1–0.499) or hexose-dominant (ratio <0.1). No significant differences in parasitoid longevity were found between the different treatments for either species. This suggests there is not an optimal sucrose/hexose ratio for parasitoid wasps, although a greater number of parasitoid species should ideally be tested to confirm if this is true for the wider parasitoid taxonomic groups.     

Responses of nectar‐feeding birds to floral resources at multiple spatial scales

The responses of animal pollinators to the spatially heterogeneous distribution of floral resources are important for plant reproduction, especially in species‐rich plant communities. We explore how responses of pollinators to floral resources varied across multiple spatial scales and studied the responses of two nectarivorous bird species (Cape sugarbird Promerops cafer, orange‐breasted sunbird Anthobaphes violacea) to resource distributions provided by communities of co‐flowering Protea species (Proteaceae) in South African fynbos. We used highly resolved maps of about 125 000 Protea plants at 27 sites and estimated the seasonal dynamics of standing crop of nectar sugar for each plant to describe the spatiotemporal distribution of floral resources. We recorded avian population sizes and the rates of bird visits to > 1300 focal plants to assess the responses of nectarivorous birds to floral resources at different spatial scales. The population sizes of the two bird species responded positively to the amount of sugar resources at the site scale. Within sites, the effects of floral resources on pollinator visits to plants varied across scales and depended on the resources provided by individual plants. At large scales (radii > 25 m around focal plants), high sugar density decreased per‐plant visitation rates, i.e. plants competed for animal pollinators. At small scales (radii < 5 m around focal plants), we observed either competition or facilitation for pollinators between plants, depending on the sugar amount offered by individual focal plants. In plants with copious sugar, per‐plant visitation rates increased with increasing local sugar density, but visitation rates decreased in plants with little sugar. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent responses of pollinators to floral resources and reveals that pollinators’ responses depend on the interplay between individual floral resources and local resource neighbourhood.     

Taste responses of Drosophila melanogaster

The amounts of sugar solution consumed by Drosophila melanogaster flies were determined. Starved and desiccated flies of a wild type strain (QA) consume 7?9 × 10^?2 λ of a 0.3 M sucrose solution per fly during the first hour and less later. They consume more of the 0.3 M sucrose solution than of the more diluted and the more concentrated solutions. In preference-aversion tests the flies discriminated between water and various sugar solutions, and between different sugar concentrations. Contrary to other fly species these flies did not prefer 0.05 M fructose over 0.05 M glucose. 0.3–0.5 M NaCl added to 0.1 M sucrose turned a preference over 0.01 sucrose into an aversion. A mutant, Lot-94, selected for its increased consumption of a 1 M NaCl solution was found to consume more of all test solutions. The amount of NaCl that had to be added to 0.1 M sucrose to turn the preference over 0.01 M sucrose by the mutant flies into aversion was not different from that found for the wild type flies.     

Sucrose hydrolysis does not limit food intake by Pallas's long-tongued bats

Nectarivorous bats include very dilute nectar in their natural diet, and recent work with Pallas's long-tongued bat Glossophaga soricina showed that sugar (energy) intake rate decreased at dilute sucrose solutions. However, chiropterophillous nectar is composed mainly of the hexoses glucose and fructose. Because bats fed hexose nectar would save the delay of hydrolyzing sucrose, we hypothesized that sugar intake rate should be higher on this diet than on sucrose nectar. We compared intake response in Pallas's long-tongued bats offered 1 : 1 glucose-fructose (hexose) and sucrose diets at 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% (mass/volume) sugar solutions. We also tested the hypothesis that sucrose hydrolysis limits food intake in bats. Intake response was the same in bats fed both types of diet: sugar intake rate was lower in dilute solutions and then increased with sugar concentration. Similar intake responses in both diets indicate that sucrose hydrolysis alone does not limit food intake and support the idea that the burden of processing excess water in dilute solutions plays a major role.     

Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice

Most mammals prefer the sweet taste of sugars, which is mediated by the heterodimeric T1R2+T1R3 taste receptor. Sugar appetite is also enhanced by the post-oral reinforcing actions of the nutrient in the gut. Here, we examined the contribution of gut T1R3 (either alone or as part of the T1R3+T1R3 receptor) to post-oral sugar reinforcement using a flavor-conditioning paradigm. We trained mice to associate consumption of a flavored solution (CS+) with intragastric (IG) infusions of a sweetener, and a different flavored solution (CS-) with IG infusions of water (23 h/day); then, we measured preference in a CS+ vs. CS- choice test. In experiment 1, we predicted that if activation of gut T1R3 mediates sugar reinforcement, then IG infusions of a nutritive (sucrose) or nonnutritive (sucralose) ligand for this receptor should condition a preference for the CS+ in B6 wild-type (WT) mice. While the mice that received IG sucrose infusions developed a strong preference for the CS+, those that received IG sucralose infusions developed a weak avoidance of the CS+. In experiment 2, we used T1R3 knockout (KO) mice to examine the necessity of gut T1R2+T1R3 receptors for conditioned flavor preferences. If intact gut T1R3 (or T1R2+T1R3) receptors are necessary for flavor-sugar conditioning, then T1R3 KO mice should not develop a sugar-conditioned flavor preference. We found that T1R3 KO mice, like WT mice, acquired a strong preference for the CS+ paired with IG sucrose infusions. The KO mice were also like WT mice in avoiding a CS+ flavor paired with IG sucralose infusions These findings provide clear evidence that gut T1R3 receptors are not necessary for sugar-conditioned flavor preferences or sucralose-induced flavor avoidance in mice.     

Comparison of the ecology and evolution of plants with a generalist bird pollination system between continents and islands worldwide

Thousands of plant species worldwide are dependent on birds for pollination. While the ecology and evolution of interactions between specialist nectarivorous birds and the plants they pollinate is relatively well understood, very little is known on pollination by generalist birds. The flower characters of this pollination syndrome are clearly defined but the geographical distribution patterns, habitat preferences and ecological factors driving the evolution of generalist‐bird‐pollinated plant species have never been analysed. Herein I provide an overview, compare the distribution of character states for plants growing on continents with those occurring on oceanic islands and discuss the environmental factors driving the evolution of both groups. The ecological niches of generalist‐bird‐pollinated plant species differ: on continents these plants mainly occur in habitats with pronounced climatic seasonality whereas on islands generalist‐bird‐pollinated plant species mainly occur in evergreen forests. Further, on continents generalist‐bird‐pollinated plant species are mostly shrubs and other large woody species producing numerous flowers with a self‐incompatible reproductive system, while on islands they are mostly small shrubs producing fewer flowers and are self‐compatible. This difference in character states indicates that diverging ecological factors are likely to have driven the evolution of these groups: on continents, plants that evolved generalist bird pollination escape from pollinator groups that tend to maintain self‐pollination by installing feeding territories in single flowering trees or shrubs, such as social bees or specialist nectarivorous birds. This pattern is more pronounced in the New compared to the Old World. By contrast, on islands, plants evolved generalist bird pollination as an adaptation to birds as a reliable pollinator group, a pattern previously known from plants pollinated by specialist nectarivorous birds in tropical mountain ranges. Additionally, I discuss the evolutionary origins of bird pollination systems in comparison to systems involving specialist nectarivorous birds and reconstruct the bird pollination system of Hawaii, which may represent an intermediate between a specialist and generalist bird pollination system. I also discuss the interesting case of Australia, where it is difficult to distinguish between specialist and generalist bird pollination systems.     

Bird pollinators differ in their tolerance of a nectar alkaloid

Although the function of nectar is to attract and reward pollinators, secondary metabolites produced by plants as anti‐herbivore defences are frequently present in floral nectars. Greater understanding is needed of the effects of secondary metabolites in nectar on the foraging behaviour and performance of pollinators, and on plant–pollinator interactions. We investigated how nectar‐feeding birds, both specialist (white‐bellied sunbirds Cinnyris talatala) and generalist (dark‐capped bulbuls Pycnonotus tricolor and Cape white‐eyes Zosterops virens), respond to artificial nectar containing the alkaloid nicotine, present in nectar of Nicotiana species. Preference tests were carried out with a range of nicotine concentrations (0.1–300 μM) in two sucrose concentrations (0.25 and 1 M), and for bulbuls also in two sugars (sucrose and hexose). In addition, we measured short‐term feeding patterns in white‐bellied sunbirds that were offered nicotine (0–50 μM) in 0.63 M sucrose. Both nicotine and sugar concentrations influenced the response of bird pollinators to nicotine. The birds showed dose‐dependent responses to nicotine; and their tolerance of high nicotine concentrations was reduced on the dilute 0.25 M sucrose diet, on which they increased consumption to maintain energy intake. White‐bellied sunbirds decreased both feeding frequency and feeding duration as the nicotine concentration in artificial nectar increased. Of the three species, bulbuls showed the highest tolerance for nicotine, and sugar type (sucrose or hexose) had no effect. The indifference of bulbuls to nicotine may be related to their primarily frugivorous diet. However, the response of white‐eyes to nicotine in the dilute sucrose solution was very similar to that of sunbirds, even though white‐eyes are generalist nectar‐feeders. Additional testing of other avian nectarivores and different secondary metabolites is required to further elucidate whether generalist bird pollinators, which utilise dilute nectars in which secondary metabolites have stronger deterrent effects, are more tolerant of ‘toxic’ nectar.     

Invertase and maltase in the free space of the maize scutellum

When maize scutellum slices were incubated in solutions of sucrose or maltose, there was a release of glucose into the bathing solution. The pH optima for glucose release were 2.5 for sucrose and 3.5 for maltose. From measurement of rates of glucose uptake into slices in the presence or absence of sucrose, it is calculated that glucose uptake will introduce errors of 3–9%, depending on the sucrose concentration, in estimates of free-space sucrose-hydrolase activity at pH 2.5. At their respective pH optima, maltose was hydrolysed at a rate 2.5 times that of sucrose. When frozen-thawed slices were used the same pH optima were obtained, but rates of hydrolysis were increased. Raffinose and melezitose also were hydrolysed with pH optima of 2.5 and 3.5, respectively. α-Methyl glucose was not hydrolysed. A 60-min HCl treatment (pH 2) of scutellum slices destroyed 69% of the sucrose-hydrolase activity and 100% of the maltose-hydrolase activity. In contrast, sucrose uptake and sucrose synthesis from exogenous fructose were not affected by HCl treatment. It is concluded that there are two hydrolases, acid invertase and maltase; that they are either on or outside the plasmalemma (in the free space); and that they are not necessary to the disaccharide uptake processes either by supplying exogenous hexose or by acting as transporters.