From plant–microbe interactions to symbiogenetics: a universal paradigm for the interspecies genetic integration

Beneficial plant–microbe symbioses are based on the integration of genetic material from diverse organisms resulting in formation of superorganism genetic systems. Analysis of their functions and evolution requires the establishment of a new biological discipline, proposed to be called symbiogenetics, which provides a basis for fundamental and applied research of the genetic control over different (symbiotic and biocenotic) biotic interactions. In ecology and agrobiology, the approaches of symbiogenetics are indispensable for optimising the interactions between the plants and the beneficial microbes to be used in ecosystem management and in sustainable crop production in which hazardous fertilisers and pesticides should be replaced by environmentally friendly microbial inoculants.     

Tansley Review No. 106

For three decades, hypotheses relating to the occurrence and function of cyclic nucleotides in higher plants have been highly controversial. Although cyclic nucleotides had been shown to have key regulatory roles in animals and bacteria, investigations with higher plants in the 1970s and early 1980s were criticized on the basis of (i) a lack of specificity of effects apparently elicited by cyclic nucleotides, (ii) the equivocal identification of putative endogenous cyclic nucleotides and (iii) ambiguity in the identification of enzymes connected with cyclic nucleotide. More recent evidence based on more rigorous identification procedures has demonstrated conclusively the presence of cyclic nucleotides, nucleotidyl cyclases and cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases in higher plants, and has identified plant processes subject to regulation by cyclic nucleotides. Here we review the history of the debate, the recent evidence establishing the presence of these compounds and their role; future research objectives are discussed.     

Tansley Review No. 110.

S UMMARY 367
I. I NTRODUCTION 367
II. N UMBER 368
III. S IZE 379
IV. A IR SPACE IN THE SEEDS 381
V. F LOATATION AND DISPERSAL 383
1. Air 383
(a) Physical considerations 383
(b) Dispersal 387
(c) Birds 415
2. Water 416
(a) Physical considerations 416
(b) Dispersal 416
VI. C ONCLUSIONS 417
Acknowledgements 417
References 418
Orchid seeds are very small, extremely light and produced in great numbers. Most range in length from c . 0.05 to 6.0 mm, with the difference between the longest and shortest known seeds in the family being 120-fold. The 'widest' seed at 0.9 mm is 90-fold wider than the 'thinnest' one, which measures 0.01 mm (because orchid seeds are tubular or balloon-like, 'wide' and 'thin' actually refer to diameter). Known seed weights extend from 0.31 lg to 24 μg (a 78-fold difference). Recorded numbers of seeds per fruit are as high as 4000000 and as low as 20–50 (80000–200000-fold difference). Testae are usually transparent, with outer cell walls that may be smooth or reticulated. Ultrasonic treatments enhance germination, which suggests that the testae can be restrictive. Embryos are even smaller: their volume is substantially smaller than that of the testa. As a result, orchid seeds have large internal air spaces that render them balloon-like. They can float in the air for long periods, a property that facilitates long-distance dispersal. The difficult-to-wet outer surfaces of the testa and large internal air spaces enable the seeds to float on water for prolonged periods. This facilitates distribution through tree effluates and/or small run-off rivulets that may follow rains. Due to their size and characteristics, orchid seeds may also be transported in and on land animals and birds (in fur, feathers or hair, mud on feet, and perhaps also following ingestion).     

Azolla and other plant-cyanobacteria symbioses: Aspects of form and function

Nostoc, a genus of filamentous, heterocystous, cyanobacteria, is widely distributed in the free-living state. It is also the most common phycobiont in N₂-fixing lichens and occurs as the N₂-fixing symbiont in a small and diverse group of green plants. These include several bryophyte genera (e.g. Anthoceros and Blasia), a pteridophyte genus (Azolla; while the symbiont is referred to asAnabaena azollae, it may be aNostoc spp.), a division of gymnosperms (the 10 cycad genera) and one angiosperm genus (Gunnera). In Gunnera the Nostoc apparently penetrates into the cells of the host. In the other associations Nostoc is extracellular but specific morphological modifications and/or structures of the host plant organs create an environment which fosters interaction and metabolite interchange.The individual group of Nostoc-green plant symbioses other than Azolla are summarized in regard to the current understanding of their establishment, perpetuation, and host-symbiont interaction. This includes available information on recognition and specificity, mode(s) of infection if applicable, and a synopsis of morphological modifications of the partners. The symbiosis withAzolla is then addressed separately with a more indepth account of the foregoing areas. In addition, the concept ofAzolla harboring a dominant, obiligately symbiotic Nostoc which has not been cultured as well as minor symbionts capable of free-living growth, the distinction between re-constituting and simply re-establishing the symbiosis, and current approaches to improving the symbiosis and to authenticating the establishment of new associations are considered.     

Tansley Review No. 59 Leaf boundary layers

Studies of heat and mass exchange between leaves and their local environment are central to our understanding of plant-atmosphere interactions. The transfer across aerodynamic leaf boundary layers is generally described by non-dimensional expressions which reflect largely empirical adaptations of engineering models derived for flat plates. This paper reviews studies on leaves, and leaf models with varying degrees of abstraction, in free and forced convection. It discusses implecations of finding for leaf morphology as it affects – and is affected by – the local microclimate. Predictions of transfer from many leaves in plant communities are complicated by physical and physiological feedback mechanisms between leaves and their environment. Some common approaches, and the current challenge of integrating leaf-atmosphere interactions into models of global relevance, are also briefly addressed.     

Microbiology is the basis of sustainable agriculture: an opinion

Agricultural microbiology is presented as a synthetic research field responsible for knowledge transfer from general microbiology and microbial ecology to the agricultural biotechnologies. The major goal of agricultural microbiology is a comprehensive analysis of symbiotic micro‐organisms (bacteria, fungi) interacting with agriculturally important plants and animals: here we have focussed on plants. In plants, interactions with micro‐organisms are diverse, ranging from two‐partite symbioses (e.g. legume–rhizobia N₂‐fixing nodular symbioses or arbuscular mycorrhiza) to multipartite endophytic and epiphytic (root‐associated, phyllosphere) communities. Two‐partite symbioses provide the clearest models for addressing genetic cooperation between partners, resulting in the formation of super‐organism genetic systems, which are responsible for host productivity. Analysis of these systems has now been extended considerably by using the approaches of metagenomics, which allow the dissection of taxonomic/population structures and the metabolic/ecological functions of microbial communities, which have resulted from the adaptation of free‐living, soil microflora in the endosymbiotic niches. Both beneficial (nutritional, defensive, regulatory) and antagonistic (biocontrol) functions expressed by symbiotic microbes towards their hosts are the potential subjects of effective agronomic use. A fundamental knowledge of the genetics, molecular biology, ecology and evolution of symbiotic interactions could enable the development of microbe‐based sustainable agriculture. This could achieve: (a) an improvement of major adaptive functions and productivity in crop plants by manipulating their microbial cohabitants; (b) partial or even full substitution of ecologically hazardous agrochemicals (mineral fertilizers, pesticides) by microbial preparations; (c) a decrease in the cost and an improvement of the quality of agricultural products.