Genomics and early cellular evolution. The origin of the DNA world.

The sequencing of several genomes from each of the three domains of life (Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya) has provided a huge amount of data that can be used to gain insight about early cellular evolution. Some features of the universal tree of life based on rRNA polygenies have been confirmed, such as the division of the cellular living world into three domains. The monophyly of each domain is supported by comparative genomics. However, the hyperthermophilic nature of the 'last universal common ancestor' (LUCA) is not confirmed. Comparative genomics has revealed that gene transfers have been (and still are) very frequent in genome evolution. Nevertheless, a core of informational genes appears more resistant to transfer, testifying for a close relationship between archaeal and eukaryal informational processes. This observation can be explained either by a common unique history between Archaea and Eukarya or by an atypical evolution of these systems in Bacteria. At the moment, comparative genomics still does not allow to choose between a simple LUCA, possibly with an RNA genome, or a complex LUCA, with a DNA genome and informational mechanisms similar to those of Archaea and Eukarya. Further comparative studies on informational mechanisms in the three domains should help to resolve this critical question. The role of viruses in the origin and evolution of DNA genomes also appears an area worth of active investigations. I suggest here that DNA and DNA replication mechanisms appeared first in the virus world before being transferred into cellular organisms.     

Modern mRNA proofreading and repair: clues that the last universal common ancestor possessed an RNA genome?

RNA repair has now been demonstrated to be a genuine biological process and appears to be present in all three domains of life. In this article, we consider what this might mean for the transition from an early RNA-dominated world to modern cells possessing genetically encoded proteins and DNA. There are significant gaps in our understanding of how the modern protein-DNA world could have evolved from a simpler system, and it is currently uncertain whether DNA genomes evolved once or twice. Against this backdrop, the discovery of RNA repair in modern cells is timely food for thought and brings us conceptually one step closer to understanding how RNA genomes were replaced by DNA genomes. We have examined the available literature on multisubunit RNA polymerase structure and function and conclude that a strong case can be made that the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) possessed a repair-competent RNA polymerase, which would have been capable of acting on an RNA genome. However, while this lends credibility to the proposal that the LUCA had an RNA genome, the alternative, that LUCA had a DNA genome, cannot be completely ruled out.     

The two ages of the RNA world, and the transition to the DNA world: a story of viruses and cells

Most evolutionists agree to consider that our present RNA/DNA/protein world has originated from a simpler world in which RNA played both the role of catalyst and genetic material. Recent findings from structural studies and comparative genomics now allow to get a clearer picture of this transition. These data suggest that evolution occurred in several steps, first from an RNA to an RNA/protein world (defining two ages of the RNA world) and finally to the present world based on DNA. The DNA world itself probably originated in two steps, first the U-DNA world, following the invention of ribonucleotide reductase, and later on the T-DNA world, with the independent invention of at least two thymidylate synthases. Recently, several authors have suggested that evolution from the RNA world up to the Last Universal Cellular Ancestor (LUCA) could have occurred before the invention of cells. On the contrary, I argue here that evolution of the RNA world taken place in a framework of competing cells and viruses (preys, predators and symbionts). I focus on the RNA-to-DNA transition and expand my previous hypothesis that viruses played a critical role in the emergence of DNA. The hypothesis that DNA and associated mechanisms (replication, repair, recombination) first evolved and diversified in a world of DNA viruses infecting RNA cells readily explains the existence of viral-encoded DNA transaction proteins without cellular homologues. It also potentially explains puzzling observations from comparative genomic, such as the existence of two non-homologous DNA replication machineries in the cellular world. I suggest here a specific scenario for the transfer of DNA from viruses to cells and briefly explore the intriguing possibility that several independent transfers of this kind produced the two cell types (prokaryote/eukaryote) and the three cellular domains presently known (Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya).     

What Does Virus Evolution Tell Us about Virus Origins?

Despite recent advances in our understanding of diverse aspects of virus evolution, particularly on the epidemiological scale, revealing the ultimate origins of viruses has proven to be a more intractable problem. Herein, I review some current ideas on the evolutionary origins of viruses and assess how well these theories accord with what we know about the evolution of contemporary viruses. I note the growing evidence for the theory that viruses arose before the last universal cellular ancestor (LUCA). This ancient origin theory is supported by the presence of capsid architectures that are conserved among diverse RNA and DNA viruses and by the strongly inverse relationship between genome size and mutation rate across all replication systems, such that pre-LUCA genomes were probably both small and highly error prone and hence RNA virus-like. I also highlight the advances that are needed to come to a better understanding of virus origins, most notably the ability to accurately infer deep evolutionary history from the phylogenetic analysis of conserved protein structures.     

Retroviral DNA integration: HIV and the role of LEDGF/p75

To replicate, a retrovirus must integrate a DNA copy of its RNA genome into a chromosome of the host cell. Integration is not random in the host genome but favors particular regions, and preferences differ among retroviruses. Several mechanisms might play a part in this favored integration targeting: (i) open chromatin might be preferentially accessible for viral DNA integration; (ii) DNA replication during cell division might facilitate access of integration complexes to favored sites; and (iii) cellular proteins bound to the host chromosome might tether integration complexes to favored regions. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of retroviral integration, focusing on LEDGF/p75--the first cellular protein shown to have a role in directing HIV DNA integration. Studies on LEDGF/p75 indicate that it directs HIV integration site selection by a tethering interaction, whereas the chromatin accessibility or cell cycle models are less well supported. Understanding viral integration will help improve the safety of retrovirus-based vectors used in gene therapy.     

DNA Repair Systems in Archaea: Mementos from the Last Universal Common Ancestor?

DNA repair in the Archaea is relevant to the consideration of genome maintenance and replication fidelity in the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) from two perspectives. First, these prokaryotes embody a mix of bacterial and eukaryal molecular features. Second, DNA repair proteins would have been essential in LUCA to maintain genome integrity, regardless of the environmental temperature. Yet we know very little of the basic molecular mechanisms of DNA damage and repair in the Archaea in general. Many studies on DNA repair in archaea have been conducted with hyperthermophiles because of the additional stress imposed on their macromolecules by high temperatures. In addition, of the six complete archaeal genome sequences published so far, five are thermophilic archaea. We have recently shown that the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus has an extraordinarily high capacity for repair of radiation-induced double-strand breaks and we have identified and sequenced several genes involved in DNA repair in P. furiosus. At the sequence level, only a few genes share homology with known bacterial repair genes. For instance, our phylogenetic analysis indicates that archaeal recombinases occur in two paralogous gene families, one of which is very deeply branched, and both recombinases are more closely related to the eukaryotic RAD51 and Dmc1 gene families than to the Escherichia coli recA gene. We have also identified a gene encoding a repair endo/exonuclease in the genomes of several Archaea. The archaeal sequences are highly homologous to those of the eukaryotic Rad2 family and they cluster with genes of the FEN-1 subfamily, which are known to be involved in DNA replication and repair in eukaryotes. We argue that there is a commonality of mechanisms and protein sequences, shared between prokaryotes and eukaryotes for several modes of DNA repair, reflecting diversification from a minimal set of genes thought to represent the genome of the LUCA.     

Beyond base excision repair: an evolving picture of mitochondrial DNA repair

Mitochondria are highly specialised organelles required for key cellular processes including ATP production through cellular respiration and controlling cell death via apoptosis. Unlike other organelles, mitochondria contain their own DNA genome which encodes both protein and RNA required for cellular respiration. Each cell may contain hundreds to thousands of copies of the mitochondrial genome, which is essential for normal cellular function – deviation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number is associated with cellular ageing and disease. Furthermore, mtDNA lesions can arise from both endogenous or exogenous sources and must either be tolerated or corrected to preserve mitochondrial function. Importantly, replication of damaged mtDNA can lead to stalling and introduction of mutations or genetic loss, mitochondria have adapted mechanisms to repair damaged DNA. These mechanisms rely on nuclear-encoded DNA repair proteins that are translocated into the mitochondria.Despite the presence of many known nuclear DNA repair proteins being found in the mitochondrial proteome, it remains to be established which DNA repair mechanisms are functional in mammalian mitochondria. Here, we summarise the existing and emerging research, alongside examining proteomic evidence, demonstrating that mtDNA damage can be repaired using Base Excision Repair (BER), Homologous Recombination (HR) and Microhomology-mediated End Joining (MMEJ). Critically, these repair mechanisms do not operate in isolation and evidence for interplay between pathways and repair associated with replication is discussed. Importantly, characterising non-canonical functions of key proteins and understanding the bespoke pathways used to tolerate, repair or bypass DNA damage will be fundamental in fully understanding the causes of mitochondrial genome mutations and mitochondrial dysfunction.     

The geminivirus BR1 movement protein binds single-stranded DNA and localizes to the cell nucleus.

Plant viruses encode movement proteins that are essential for infection of the host but are not required for viral replication or encapsidation. Squash leaf curl virus (SqLCV), a bipartite geminivirus with a single-stranded DNA genome, encodes two movement proteins, BR1 and BL1, that have been implicated in separate functions in viral movement. To further elucidate these functions, we have investigated the nucleic acid binding properties and cellular localization of BR1 and BL1. In this study, we showed that BR1 binds strongly to single-stranded nucleic acids, with a higher affinity for single-stranded DNA than RNA, and is localized to the nucleus of SqLCV-infected plant cells. In contrast, BL1 binds only weakly to single-stranded nucleic acids and not at all to double-stranded DNA. The nuclear localization of BR1 and the previously demonstrated plasma membrane localization of BL1 were also observed when these proteins were expressed from baculovirus vectors in Spodoptera frugiperda insect cells. The biochemical properties and cellular locations of BR1 and BL1 suggest a model for SqLCV movement whereby BR1 is involved in the shuttling of the genome in and/or out of the nucleus and BL1 acts at the plasma membrane/cell wall to facilitate viral movement across cell boundaries.     

Why Are There So Many Diverse Replication Machineries?

The replicon model has initiated a major research line in molecular biology: the study of DNA replication mechanisms. Until now, the majority of studies have focused on a limited set of model organisms, mainly from Bacteria or Opisthokont eukaryotes (human, yeasts) and a few viral systems. However, molecular evolutionists have shown that the living world is more complex and diverse than believed when the operon model was proposed. Comparison of DNA replication proteins in the three domains, Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, have surprisingly revealed the existence of two distinct sets of non-homologous cellular DNA replication proteins, one in Bacteria and the other in Archaea and Eukarya, suggesting that the last universal common ancestor possibly still had an RNA genome. A major puzzle is the presence in eukaryotes of the unfaithful DNA polymerase alpha (Pol α) to prime Okazaki fragments. Interestingly, Pol α is specifically involved in telomere biosynthesis, and its absence in Archaea correlates with the absence of telomeres. The recent discovery of telomere-like GC quartets in eukaryotic replication origins suggests a link between Pol α and the overall organization of the eukaryotic chromosome. As previously proposed by Takemura, Pol α might have originated from a mobile element of viral origin that played a critical role in the emergence of the complex eukaryotic genomes. Notably, most large DNA viruses encode DNA replication proteins very divergent from their cellular counterparts. The diversity of viral replication machineries compared to cellular ones suggests that DNA and DNA replication mechanisms first originated and diversified in the ancient virosphere, possibly explaining why they are so many different types of replication machinerie.     

Homology between avian oncornavirus RNAs and DNA from several avian species.

3H-labeled 35S RNA from avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV), Rous associated virus (RAV)-0, RAV-60, RAV-61, RAV-2, or B-77(w) was hybridized with an excess of cellular DNA from different avian species, i.e., normal or leukemic chickens, normal pheasants, turkeys, Japanese quails, or ducks. Approximately two to three copies of endogenous viral DNA were estimated to be present per diploid of normal chicken cell genome. In leukemic chicken myeloblasts induced by AMV, the number of viral sequences appeared to have doubled. The hybrids formed between viral RNA and DNA from leukemic chicken cells melted with a Tm 1 to 6 C higher than that of hybrids formed between viral RNA and normal chicken cell DNA. All of the viral RNAs tested, except RAV-61, hybridized the most with DNA from AMV-infected chicken cells, followed by DNA from normal chicken cells, and then pheasant DNA. RAV-61 RNA hybridized maximally (39%) with pheasant DNA, followed by DNA from leukemic (34%), and then normal (29%) chicken cells. All viral RNAs tested hybridized little with Japanese quail DNA (2 to 5%), turkey DNA (2 to 4%), or duck DNA (1%). DNA from normal chicken cells contained only 60 to 70% of the RAV-60 genetic information, and normal pheasant cells lacked some RAV-61 DNA sequences. RAV-60 and RAV-61 genomes were more homologous to the RAV-0 genome than to the genome of RAV-2, AMV, or B-77(s). RAV-60 and RAV-61 appear to be recombinants between endogenous and exogenous viruses.     

The role of arginine methylation in the DNA damage response

Post-translational modifications are well-known modulators of DNA damage signaling and epigenetic gene expression. Protein arginine methylation is a covalent modification that results in the addition of methyl groups to the nitrogen atoms of the arginine side chains and is catalyzed by a family of protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs). In the past, arginine methylation was mainly observed on abundant proteins such as RNA-binding proteins and histones, but recent advances have revealed a plethora of arginine methylated proteins implicated in a variety of cellular processes including RNA metabolism, epigenetic regulation and DNA repair pathways. Herein, we discuss these recent advances, focusing on the role of PRMTs in DNA damage signaling and its importance for maintaining genomic stability.     

长链非编码RNA与表观遗传调控

近年来,表观遗传学(epigenetics)备受关注.表观遗传调控的方式主要包括DNA甲基化、组蛋白修饰和染色质重塑等.ENCODE计划及随后的研究发现,人类基因组中仅有很小一部分DNA序列负责编码蛋白质,而其余大部分被转录为非编码RNA(non-codingRNA,ncRNA).其中长链非编码RNA(long non-codingRNA,lncRNA)是一类长度大于200nt并且缺乏蛋白质编码能力的RNA分子.越来越多的研究表明,lncRNAs能够通过表观遗传调控、转录调控以及转录后调控等多个层面调节基因的表达,从而参与细胞增殖、分化和凋亡等多种生物学过程.本文将着重综述lncRNAs在表观遗传调控中的作用及其最新的研究进展.     

Replicating animal mitochondrial DNA

The field of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication has been experiencing incredible progress in recent years, and yet little is certain about the mechanism(s) used by animal cells to replicate this plasmid-like genome. The long-standing strand-displacement model of mammalian mtDNA replication (for which single-stranded DNA intermediates are a hallmark) has been intensively challenged by a new set of data, which suggests that replication proceeds via coupled leading- and lagging-strand synthesis (resembling bacterial genome replication) and/or via long stretches of RNA intermediates laid on the mtDNA lagging-strand (the so called RITOLS). The set of proteins required for mtDNA replication is small and includes the catalytic and accessory subunits of DNA polymerase γ, the mtDNA helicase Twinkle, the mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding protein, and the mitochondrial RNA polymerase (which most likely functions as the mtDNA primase). Mutations in the genes coding for the first three proteins are associated with human diseases and premature aging, justifying the research interest in the genetic, biochemical and structural properties of the mtDNA replication machinery. Here we summarize these properties and discuss the current models of mtDNA replication in animal cells.     

Characterization of unstable poly (A)-RNA in Caulobacter crescentus

Antabuse (disulfiram) is widely used in the treatment of chronic alcoholism. We have examined the effect of this drug on malignant transformation by Rous sarcoma virus, on eukaryotic cell synthesis, and on nucleic acid binding. It was found that: (1) Disulfiram inhibits the activity of the RNA dependent DNA polymerase of Rous sarcoma virus and inactivates the ability of the virus to malignantly transform chick embryo cells. The monomer of disulfiram, diethyldithiocarbamate does not affect the virus. (2) Disulfiram induced the synthesis of four proteins in normal chick embryo and human foreskin cells. The monomer diethyldithiocarbamate, induced these proteins also. Cellular DNA synthesis is more sensitive to disulfiram than are RNA and protein synthesis. (3) Disulfiram binds to neither DNA or RNA in the presence or absence of copper. However, diethyldithiocarbamate in the presence of, but not in the absence of, copper binds to HeLa cell DNA and to Rous sarcoma virus 70 S genome RNA. These results indicate that this compound, which causes no symptoms in people who do not consume alcohol, may have significant effects on a cellular level.