Mutations that improve export of maltose-binding protein in SecB- cells of Escherichia coli.

It previously has been proposed that the Escherichia coli SecB protein promotes the export of the maltose-binding protein (MBP) from the cytoplasm by preventing the folding of the precursor MBP (preMBP) into a translocation-incompetent conformation. The export of wild-type MBP is only partially blocked in SecB- cells. In contrast, the export of MBP16-1, an MBP species with a defective signal peptide, is totally dependent on SecB; hence, SecB- cells that synthesize MBP16-1 are unable to utilize maltose as a sole carbon source. The selection of Mal+ revertants primarily yielded mutants with alterations in the MBP16-1 signal peptide that permitted SecB-independent MBP export to the periplasm to various extents. Although each of these alterations increased the overall hydrophobicity of the signal peptide, it was not possible to strictly equate changes in hydrophobicity with the degree of SecB-independent export. Somewhat unexpectedly, two mutants were obtained in which MBP export in SecB- cells was markedly superior to that of the wild-type MBP. Although wild-type MBP is not cotranslationally translocated in SecB- cells, the two mutant proteins designated MBP172 and MBP173 exhibited significant cotranslational export in the absence of SecB. Thus, the role of SecB was partially supplanted by a signal peptide that promoted more rapid movement of MBP through the export pathway. When preMBP included the MBP172 signal peptide as well as an alteration in the mature moiety that slows folding, the SecB requirement for maximal MBP export efficiency was almost totally eliminated. These results provide additional strong support for the proposed antifolding role of SecB in MBP export.     

Protein Traffic in Gram-negative bacteria - how exported and secreted proteins find their way

Gram-negative bacteria assemble many proteins into the inner and outer membranes and export a large number of proteins to the periplasm or to the extracellular medium. During the billions of years bacteria have been around, they have evolved a number of different pathways with sophisticated machines to accurately and efficiently move proteins from one location to another. In this review, we first introduce specific proteins that are representative substrates of the protein transport pathways and describe their function. Then, their specific routes from synthesis to their destinations are described mentioning the signal peptide that may initiate their export and discuss what is known about the folding state of the substrates during transport. The membrane translocation device involved, the energy source required for transport, and whether a chaperone is needed will be discussed.     

A bacterial two-hybrid system based on the twin-arginine transporter pathway of E. coli

We have developed a bacterial two-hybrid system for the detection of interacting proteins that capitalizes on the folding quality control mechanism of the Twin Arginine Transporter (Tat) pathway. The Tat export pathway is responsible for the membrane translocation of folded proteins, including proteins consisting of more than one polypeptide, only one of which contains a signal peptide ("hitchhiker export"). Here, one protein (bait) is expressed as a fusion to a Tat signal peptide, whereas the second protein (prey) is fused to a protein reporter that can confer a phenotype only after export into the bacterial periplasmic space. Since the prey-reporter fusion lacks a signal peptide, it can only be exported as a complex with the bait-signal peptide fusion that is capable of targeting the Tat translocon. Using maltose-binding protein as a reporter, clones expressing interacting proteins can be grown on maltose minimal media or on MacConkey plates. In addition, we introduce the use of the cysteine disulfide oxidase DsbA as a reporter. Export of a signal peptide-prey:bait-DsbA complex into the periplasm allows complementation of dsbA(-) mutants and restores the formation of active alkaline phosphatase, which in turn can be detected by a chromogenic assay.     

Export of the periplasmic maltose-binding protein ofEscherichia coli

The export of the maltose-binding protein (MBP), themalE gene product, to the periplasm ofEschericha coli cells has been extensively investigated. The isolation of strains synthesizing MalE-LacZ hybrid proteins led to a novel genetic selection for mutants that accumulate export-defective precursor MBP (preMBP) in the cytoplasm. The export defects were subsequently shown to result from alterations in the MBP signal peptide. Analysis of these and a variety of mutants obtained in other ways has provided considerable insight into the requirements for an optimally functional MBP signal peptide. This structure has been shown to have multiple roles in the export process, including promoting entry of preMBP into the export pathway and initiating MBP translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane. The latter has been shown to be a late event relative to synthesis and can occur entirely posttranslationally, even many minutes after the completion of synthesis. Translocation requires that the MBP polypeptide exist in an export-competent conformation that most likely represents an unfolded state that is not inhibitory to membrane transit. The signal peptide contributes to the export competence of preMBP by slowing the rate at which the attached mature moiety folds. In addition, preMBP folding is thought to be further retarded by the binding of a cytoplasmic protein, SecB, to the mature moiety of nascent preMBP. In cells lacking this antifolding factor, MBP export represents a race between delivery of newly synthesized, export-competent preMBP to the translocation machinery in the cytoplasmic membrane and folding of preMBP into an export-incompetent conformation. SecB is one of threeE. coli proteins classified as molecular chaperones by their ability to stabilize precursor proteins for membrane translocation.     

Export and folding of signal-sequenceless Bacillus licheniformis beta-lactamase in Escherichia coli.

Two genetically engineered variants of the Bacillus licheniformis beta-lactamase gene were expressed in Escherichia coli. One variant coded for the exo-small mature enzyme without the signal peptide. The other coded for the exo-large mature enzyme preceded by 10, mostly polar, residues from an incomplete heterologous signal. As observed following the extraction by a lysozyme-EDTA treatment, the signal-less variant was exported to the periplasm with nearly 20% efficiency, whereas the variant with the N-terminal extension was translocated to a lesser degree; interestingly, nearly all of the former and half of the latter were extracted by osmotic shock, which may be of importance for our understanding of cellular compartments. The fact that a signal-less protein is translocated with substantial yields raises questions about the essential role of signal peptides for protein export. As folding and export are related processes, we investigated the folding in vitro of the two variants. No differences were found between them. In the absence of denaturant, they are completely folded, fully active and have a large DeltaG of unfolding. Under partially denaturing conditions they populate several partially folded states. The absence of significant amounts of a non-native state under native conditions makes a thermodynamic partitioning between folding and export less likely. In addition, kinetic measurements indicated that these B. licheniformis lactamases fold much faster than E. coli beta-lactamase. This behavior suggests that they are exported by a kinetically controlled process, mediated by one or more still unidentified interactions that slow folding and allow a folding intermediate to enter the export pathway.     

Identification of a Post-targeting Step Required for Efficient Cotranslational Translocation of Proteins across the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane

Recent studies have shown that cytoplasmic proteins are exported efficiently in Escherichia coli only if they are attached to signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle and are thereby targeted to the SecYEG complex cotranslationally. The evidence suggests that the entry of these proteins into the secretory pathway at an early stage of translation is necessary to prevent them from folding into a translocation-incompetent conformation. We found, however, that several glycolytic enzymes attached to signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle were exported inefficiently. Based on previous studies of post-translational export, we hypothesized that the export block was due to the presence of basic residues at the extreme N terminus of each enzyme. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that the introduction of negatively charged residues into this segment increased the efficiency of export. Export efficiency was sensitive to the number, position, and sequence context of charged residues. The importance of charge for efficient export was underscored by an in silico analysis that revealed a conserved negative charge bias at the N terminus of the mature region of bacterial presecretory proteins. Our results demonstrate that cotranslational targeting of a protein to the E. coli SecYEG complex does not ensure its export but that export also depends on a subsequent event (most likely the initiation of translocation) that involves sequences both within and just beyond the signal peptide.Since the “signal hypothesis” was proposed over 30 years ago (1), it has become clear that signal sequences are not simply generic hydrophobic peptides that earmark proteins for secretion. In bacteria, the features of a signal peptide determine the mechanism by which a given presecretory protein is targeted to the SecYEG translocation complex in the inner membrane (IM).² Whereas most or all signal peptides are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) in mammalian cells, only a small fraction of Escherichia coli signal peptides are recognized by SRP. These signal peptides are typically extremely hydrophobic (2, 3), but SRP apparently can also recognize slightly less hydrophobic signal peptides that contain a highly basic N terminus (4). SRP recognizes signal peptides as they emerge from translating ribosomes and then targets ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the IM cotranslationally (5). The binding of SRP to its receptor (FtsY), which interacts with the SecYEG complex (6), leads to the release of the nascent chain in the immediate vicinity of the translocation machinery. By targeting nascent polypeptides to the SecYEG complex at an early stage of translation, SRP prevents its substrates from folding into a conformation that is incompatible with translocation through the narrow channel formed by the SecYEG complex (7). Because most signal peptides are not recognized by E. coli SRP, the majority of presecretory proteins are fully synthesized and targeted post-translationally to the IM. These proteins are maintained in a translocation-competent conformation by molecular chaperones such as SecB that keep them unfolded (or loosely folded) (8). Signal peptides themselves also appear to play a role in maintaining translocation competence (9, 10). After mediating the targeting reaction, signal peptides likely play a role in gating open the SecYEG complex to initiate translocation.Interestingly, although signal sequences are the most salient feature of presecretory proteins, they are neither completely necessary nor sufficient to mediate protein export in E. coli (11–13). A version of alkaline phosphatase that lacks a signal peptide is still exported, albeit very inefficiently (11). The export of the leaderless protein, unlike the export of wild-type alkaline phosphatase, is strictly dependent on SecB (11). Conversely, the attachment of signal peptides to cytoplasmic proteins often does not promote their export (14). In light of evidence that folding and export are competing events, these observations led to the proposal that exported proteins tend to fold slowly (or are prevented from folding by chaperones) and therefore remain translocation-competent even without a signal peptide, whereas cytoplasmic proteins fold rapidly into a conformation that is incompatible with export. Recent studies that used thioredoxin as a model protein have validated this hypothesis. Whereas the wild-type protein attached to a typical signal peptide remained trapped in the cytoplasm, four of five slow folding mutants were exported efficiently (15). Furthermore, attachment of a signal peptide that is recognized by SRP to thioredoxin led to efficient export (16). This idea was further confirmed by a report in which various DARPins (designed ankyrin Repeat proteins) were attached to different signal peptides. Most of the DARPins were exported efficiently when they were fused to signal peptides that mediate cotranslational targeting but remained in the cytoplasm when they were attached to signal peptides that are bypassed by SRP (17).Despite these observations, there are several lines of evidence suggesting that export efficiency is not simply dictated by the ability of a protein to reach the SecYEG complex before folding into a translocation-incompetent conformation. For reasons that are unclear, some DARPins are secreted inefficiently even when they are routed into the SRP pathway (17). In addition, numerous reports have indicated that the amino acid composition of the segment of post-translationally targeted presecretory proteins that lies just beyond the signal peptide cleavage site has a dramatic effect on export efficiency. Statistical analysis has shown that the first ∼5–15 residues of the mature region of most presecretory proteins produced by Gram-negative bacteria is neutral or has a net negative charge (18). Consistent with the observed sequence bias, the presence of multiple basic residues at the N terminus of the mature region often leads to accumulation of the secretory precursor, whereas conversion of the basic residues to acidic residues restores export (19–22). Because different combinations of proteins and signal peptides were used in these studies, the exact number and location of charged residues that impinge on the efficiency of export is unclear. In any case, the effect of the net charge in the region distal to the signal peptide on protein export has never been explained. Although basic residues might conceivably promote premature folding of presecretory proteins or block the cleavage of signal peptides by leader peptidase, it is also possible that they inhibit an uncharacterized post-targeting event. Even if effects on signal peptide cleavage could have been ruled out in the aforementioned studies, however, it would not have been possible to distinguish between effects on protein folding and effects on a hypothetical post-targeting step because only proteins that are targeted post-translationally were monitored.To gain further insight into the factors that govern the efficiency of protein export, we sought an explanation for the observation that the cotranslational targeting of at least some cytoplasmic proteins is insufficient to guarantee their translocation across the IM. We found that the export of several different endogenous E. coli cytoplasmic proteins required not only the attachment of a signal peptide that is recognized by SRP but also a net negative charge just past the signal peptide cleavage site. Taken together with previous results, our data show that the charge of the segment just beyond the signal peptide influences export efficiency irrespective of the mechanism by which a protein is targeted to the IM. Because proteins that are targeted cotranslationally reach the IM before they have a chance to fold, our results imply the existence of a post-targeting step (most likely the initiation of translocation) that is facilitated by acidic residues distal to the signal peptide and inhibited or delayed by basic residues. These results help to resolve a long-standing puzzle about the influence of the mature region of presecretory proteins on protein export and have significant implications for optimizing the export of cytosolic and heterologous proteins in E. coli.     

Requirement of the SecB chaperone for export of a non-secretory polypeptide in Escherichia coli

Summary The SecB protein of Escherichia coli is a cytosolic component of the export machinery which can prevent some precursors from prematurely folding into export-incompatible conformations by binding to the newly synthesised polypeptide. The feature(s) of target proteins recognised by SecB, however, are unclear and have been a matter of controversy. Also, it has not been asked if binding of SecB is specific for secretory proteins. We demonstrate here that a non-secretory polypeptide, a fragment of a tail fiber protein of phage T4, fused to the signal peptide of the outer membrane protein OmpA has a very strong SecB requirement for export and that the signal peptide itself cannot, at least not alone, be responsible for this action of SecB. The data reported, together with those of the literature, suggest that SecB recognizes the polypeptide backbone of the target protein.     

Escherichia coli “TatExpress” strains export several g/L human growth hormone to the periplasm by the Tat pathway

Escherichia coli is a heavily used platform for the production of biotherapeutic and other high-value proteins, and a favored strategy is to export the protein of interest to the periplasm to simplify downstream processing and facilitate disulfide bond formation. The Sec pathway is the standard means of transporting the target protein but it is unable to transport complex or rapidly folding proteins because the Sec system can only transport proteins in an unfolded state. The Tat system also operates to transport proteins to the periplasm, and it has significant potential as an alternative means of recombinant protein production because it transports fully folded proteins. Here, we have tested the Tat system's full potential for the production of biotherapeutics for the first time using fed-batch fermentation. We expressed human growth hormone (hGH) with a Tat signal peptide in E. coli W3110 “TatExpress” strains that contain elevated levels of the Tat apparatus. This construct contained four amino acids from TorA at the hGH N-terminus as well as the initiation methionine from hGH, which is removed in vivo. We show that the protein is efficiently exported to the periplasm during extended fed-batch fermentation, to the extent that it is by far the most abundant protein in the periplasm. The protein was shown to be homogeneous, disulfide bonded, and active. The bioassay showed that the yields of purified periplasmic hGH are 5.4 g/L culture whereas an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay gave a figure of 2.39 g/L. Separate analysis of a TorA signal peptide linked to hGH construct lacking any additional amino acids likewise showed efficient export to the periplasm, although yields were approximately two-fold lower.     

Trigger factor retards protein export in Escherichia coli

Trigger factor (TF) is a ribosome-associated protein that interacts with a wide variety of nascent polypeptides in Escherichia coli. Previous studies have indicated that TF cooperates with DnaK to facilitate protein folding, but the basis of this cooperation is unclear. In this study we monitored protein export in E. coli that lack or overproduce TF to obtain further insights into its function. Whereas inactivation of genes encoding most molecular chaperones (including dnaK) impairs protein export, inactivation of the TF gene accelerated protein export and suppressed the need for targeting factors to maintain the translocation competence of presecretory proteins. Furthermore, overproduction of TF (but not DnaK) markedly retarded protein export. Manipulation of TF levels produced similar effects on the export of a cytosolic enzyme fused to a signal peptide. The data strongly suggest that TF has a unique ability to sequester nascent polypeptides for a relatively prolonged period. Based on our results, we propose that TF and DnaK promote protein folding by distinct (but complementary) mechanisms.     

Specificity of signal peptide recognition in tat-dependent bacterial protein translocation

The bacterial twin arginine translocation (Tat) pathway translocates across the cytoplasmic membrane folded proteins which, in most cases, contain a tightly bound cofactor. Specific amino-terminal signal peptides that exhibit a conserved amino acid consensus motif, S/T-R-R-X-F-L-K, direct these proteins to the Tat translocon. The glucose-fructose oxidoreductase (GFOR) of Zymomonas mobilis is a periplasmic enzyme with tightly bound NADP as a cofactor. It is synthesized as a cytoplasmic precursor with an amino-terminal signal peptide that shows all of the characteristics of a typical twin arginine signal peptide. However, GFOR is not exported to the periplasm when expressed in the heterologous host Escherichia coli, and enzymatically active pre-GFOR is found in the cytoplasm. A precise replacement of the pre-GFOR signal peptide by an authentic E. coli Tat signal peptide, which is derived from pre-trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) reductase (TorA), allowed export of GFOR, together with its bound cofactor, to the E. coli periplasm. This export was inhibited by carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, but not by sodium azide, and was blocked in E. coli tatC and tatAE mutant strains, showing that membrane translocation of the TorA-GFOR fusion protein occurred via the Tat pathway and not via the Sec pathway. Furthermore, tight cofactor binding (and therefore correct folding) was found to be a prerequisite for proper translocation of the fusion protein. These results strongly suggest that Tat signal peptides are not universally recognized by different Tat translocases, implying that the signal peptides of Tat-dependent precursor proteins are optimally adapted only to their cognate export apparatus. Such a situation is in marked contrast to the situation that is known to exist for Sec-dependent protein translocation.     

Degradation of Extracytoplasmic Catalysts for Protein Folding in Bacillus subtilis

The general protein secretion pathway of Bacillus subtilis has a high capacity for protein export from the cytoplasm, which is exploited in the biotechnological production of a wide range of enzymes. These exported proteins pass the membrane in an unfolded state, and accordingly, they have to fold into their active and protease-resistant conformations once membrane passage is completed. The lipoprotein PrsA and the membrane proteins HtrA and HtrB facilitate the extracytoplasmic folding and quality control of exported proteins. Among the native exported proteins of B. subtilis are at least 10 proteases that have previously been implicated in the degradation of heterologous secreted proteins. Recently, we have shown that these proteases also degrade many native membrane proteins, lipoproteins, and secreted proteins. The present studies were therefore aimed at assessing to what extent these proteases also degrade extracytoplasmic catalysts for protein folding. To this end, we employed a collection of markerless protease mutant strains that lack up to 10 different extracytoplasmic proteases. The results show that PrsA, HtrA, and HtrB are indeed substrates of multiple extracytoplasmic proteases. Thus, improved protein secretion by multiple-protease-mutant strains may be related to both reduced proteolysis and improved posttranslocational protein folding and quality control.     

Antifolding activity of hsp60 couples protein import into the mitochondrial matrix with export to the intermembrane space.

Cytochrome b2 reaches the intermembrane space of mitochondria by transport into the matrix followed by export across the inner membrane. While in the matrix, the protein interacts with hsp60, which arrests its folding prior to export. The bacterial-type export sequence in pre-cytochrome b2 functions by inhibiting the ATP-dependent release of the protein from hsp60. Release for export apparently requires, in addition to ATP, the interaction of the signal sequence with a component of the export machinery in the inner membrane. Export can occur before import is complete provided that a critical length of the polypeptide chain has been translocated into the matrix. Thus, hsp60 combines two activities: catalysis of folding of proteins destined for the matrix, and maintaining proteins in an unfolded state to facilitate their channeling between the machineries for import and export across the inner membrane. Anti-folding signals such as the hydrophobic export sequence in cytochrome b2 may act as switches between these two activities.     

Trigger factor interacts with the signal peptide of nascent Tat substrates but does not play a critical role in Tat-mediated export.

Twin-arginine translocation (Tat)-mediated protein transport across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane occurs only after synthesis and folding of the substrate protein that contains a signal peptide with a characteristic twin-arginine motif. This implies that premature contact between the Tat signal peptide and the Tat translocon in the membrane must be prevented. We used site-specific photo-crosslinking to demonstrate that the signal peptide of nascent Tat proteins is in close proximity to the chaperone and peptidyl-prolyl isomerase trigger factor (TF). The contact with TF was strictly dependent on the context of the translating ribosome, started early in biogenesis when the nascent chain left the ribosome near L23, and persisted until the chain reached its full length. Despite this exclusive and prolonged contact, depletion or overexpression of TF had little effect on the kinetics and efficiency of the Tat export process.     

Engineering antibody fitness and function using membrane-anchored display of correctly folded proteins

A hallmark of the bacterial twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway is its ability to export folded proteins. Here, we discovered that overexpressed Tat substrate proteins form two distinct, long-lived translocation intermediates that are readily detected by immunolabeling methods. Formation of the early translocation intermediate Ti-1, which exposes the N- and C-termini to the cytoplasm, did not require an intact Tat translocase, a functional Tat signal peptide, or a correctly folded substrate. In contrast, formation of the later translocation intermediate, Ti-2, which exhibits a bitopic topology with the N-terminus in the cytoplasm and C-terminus in the periplasm, was much more particular, requiring an intact translocase, a functional signal peptide, and a correctly folded substrate protein. The ability to directly detect Ti-2 intermediates was subsequently exploited for a new protein engineering technology called MAD-TRAP (membrane-anchored display for Tat-based recognition of associating proteins). Through the use of just two rounds of mutagenesis and screening with MAD-TRAP, the intracellular folding and antigen-binding activity of a human single-chain antibody fragment were simultaneously improved. This approach has several advantages for library screening, including the unique involvement of the Tat folding quality control mechanism that ensures only native-like proteins are displayed, thus eliminating poorly folded sequences from the screening process.     

Protein quality control in the bacterial periplasm

The proper functioning of extracytoplasmic proteins requires their export to, and productive folding in, the correct cellular compartment. All proteins in Escherichia coli are initially synthesized in the cytoplasm, then follow a pathway that depends upon their ultimate cellular destination. Many proteins destined for the periplasm are synthesized as precursors carrying an N-terminal signal sequence that directs them to the general secretion machinery at the inner membrane. After translocation and signal sequence cleavage, the newly exported mature proteins are folded and assembled in the periplasm. Maintaining quality control over these processes depends on chaperones, folding catalysts, and proteases. This article summarizes the general principles which control protein folding in the bacterial periplasm by focusing on the periplasmic maltose-binding protein.     

Export pathway selectivity of Escherichia coli twin arginine translocation signal peptides

The Escherichia coli genome encodes at least 29 putative signal peptides containing a twin arginine motif characteristic of proteins exported via the twin arginine translocation (Tat) pathway. Fusions of the putative Tat signal peptides plus six to eight amino acids of the mature proteins to three reporter proteins (short-lived green fluorescent protein, maltose-binding protein (MBP), and alkaline phosphatase) and also data from the cell localization of epitope-tagged full-length proteins were employed to determine the ability of the 29 signal peptides to direct export through the Tat pathway, through the general secretory pathway (Sec), or through both. 27/29 putative signal peptides could export one or more reporter proteins through Tat. Of these, 11 signal peptides displayed Tat specificity in that they could not direct the export of Sec-only reporter proteins. The rest (16/27) were promiscuous and were capable of directing export of the appropriate reporter either via Tat (green fluorescent protein, MBP) or via Sec (PhoA, MBP). Mutations that conferred a >or=+1 charge to the N terminus of the mature protein abolished or drastically reduced routing through the Sec pathway without affecting the ability to export via the Tat pathway. These experiments demonstrate that the charge of the mature protein N terminus affects export promiscuity, independent of the effect of the folding state of the mature protein.     

Signal peptide hydrophobicity is critical for early stages in protein export by Bacillus subtilis

Signal peptides that direct protein export in Bacillus subtilis are overall more hydrophobic than signal peptides in Escherichia coli. To study the importance of signal peptide hydrophobicity for protein export in both organisms, the alpha-amylase AmyQ was provided with leucine-rich (high hydrophobicity) or alanine-rich (low hydrophobicity) signal peptides. AmyQ export was most efficiently directed by the authentic signal peptide, both in E. coli and B. subtilis. The leucine-rich signal peptide directed AmyQ export less efficiently in both organisms, as judged from pulse-chase labelling experiments. Remarkably, the alanine-rich signal peptide was functional in protein translocation only in E. coli. Cross-linking of in vitro synthesized ribosome nascent chain complexes (RNCs) to cytoplasmic proteins showed that signal peptide hydrophobicity is a critical determinant for signal peptide binding to the Ffh component of the signal recognition particle (SRP) or to trigger factor, not only in E. coli, but also in B. subtilis. The results show that B. subtilis SRP can discriminate between signal peptides with relatively high hydrophobicities. Interestingly, the B. subtilis protein export machinery seems to be poorly adapted to handle alanine-rich signal peptides with a low hydrophobicity. Thus, signal peptide hydrophobicity appears to be more critical for the efficiency of early stages in protein export in B. subtilis than in E. coli.     

Effect of signal peptide on the stability and folding kinetics of maltose binding protein

While the role of the signal sequence in targeting proteins to specific subcellular compartments is well characterized, there are fewer studies that characterize its effects on the stability and folding kinetics of the protein. We report a detailed characterization of the folding kinetics and thermodynamic stabilities of maltose binding protein (MBP) and its precursor form, preMBP. Isothermal GdmCl and urea denaturation as a function of temperature and thermal denaturation studies have been carried out to compare stabilities of the two proteins. preMBP was found to be destabilized by about 2-6 kcal/mol (20-40%) with respect to MBP. Rapid cleavage of the signal peptide by various proteases shows that the signal peptide is accessible in the native form of preMBP. The observed rate constant of the major slow phase in folding was decreased 5-fold in preMBP relative to MBP. The rate constants of unfolding were similar at 25 degrees C, but preMBP also exhibited a large burst phase change in unfolding that was absent in MBP. At 10 degrees C, preMBP exhibited a higher unfolding rate than MBP as well as a large burst phase. The appreciable destabilization of MBP by signal peptide is functionally relevant, because it enhances the likelihood of finding the protein in an unfolded translocation-competent form and may influence the interactions of the protein with the translocation machinery. Destabilization is likely to result from favorable interactions between the hydrophobic signal peptide and other hydrophobic regions that are exposed in the unfolded state.     

The rate of folding dictates substrate secretion by the Escherichia coli hemolysin type 1 secretion system

Secretion of the Escherichia coli toxin hemolysin A (HlyA) is catalyzed by the membrane protein complex HlyB-HlyD-TolC and requires a secretion sequence located within the last 60 amino acids of HlyA. The Hly translocator complex exports a variety of passenger proteins when fused N-terminal to this secretion sequence. However, not all fusions are secreted efficiently. Here, we demonstrate that the maltose binding protein (MalE) lacking its natural export signal and fused to the HlyA secretion signal is poorly secreted by the Hly system. We anticipated that folding kinetics might be limiting secretion, and we therefore introduced the "folding" mutation Y283D. Indeed this mutant fusion protein was secreted at a much higher level. This level was further enhanced by the introduction of a second MalE folding mutation (V8G or A276G). Secretion did not require the molecular chaperone SecB. Folding analysis revealed that all mutations reduced the refolding rate of the substrate, whereas the unfolding rate was unaffected. Thus, the efficiency of secretion by the Hly system is dictated by the folding rate of the substrate. Moreover, we demonstrate that fusion proteins defective in export can be engineered for secretion while still retaining function.     

未折叠蛋白质应答

内质网是真核细胞中蛋白质合成、折叠与分泌的重要细胞器.细胞进化出一套完整的机制来监督和帮助内质网内蛋白质的折叠与修饰.而当错误折叠的蛋白质累积时,细胞通过一系列信号转导途径,对其进行应答,包括增强蛋白质折叠能力、停滞大多数蛋白质的翻译、加速蛋白质的降解等.如果内质网功能素乱持续,细胞将最终启动凋亡程序.这些反应被统称为未折叠蛋白质应答(unfolded protein response,UPR).UPR是多个信号转导通路的总称,包括IRE1-XBP1、PERK-ATF4以及ATF6等信号途径.除了应激条件外,UPR还被用于正常生理条件下的调节,例如胆固醇合成代谢的负反馈调控.