Phylogeny and biogeography of the Vitrinidae (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora)

The phylogeny of the Vitrinidae is reconstructed in a cladistic analysis based on characters of the genitalia, the copulation behaviour and the radula. The genera with an atrial stimulator turned out to be the earliest branches of the Vitrinidae, whereas the genera with a glandula amatoria form a monophyletic, taxonomically apomorphic group. The differences between the proposed phylogeny and previous hypotheses are discussed. The ancestral areas of the Vitrinidae and its sister group, the limacoid slugs Boettgerillidae–Limacidae–Agriolimacidae, are estimated using weighted ancestral area analysis. The Vitrinidae and the limacoid slugs might have originated by a vicariance event between Central Europe and the Near East. © 2002 The Linnean Society of London. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2002, 134 , 347–358.     

Size patterns among competitors: ecological character displacement and character release in mammals, with special reference to island populations

Morphological relationship among sympatric animal species have often been seen as indirect evidence for competition. Many early ecomorphological studies revealed patterns that were taken as indicating character displacement and character release, driven by competition or lack thereof. These patterns may result from a coevolutionary morphological response or from species sorting according to size. Thus, the relationship between morphology and competition may be crucial for understanding both the morphological evolution of animals and the role of competition in structuring communities. Some earlier research perceived as indicating morphological relationships conditioned by interaction of species was conducted on mammals, particularly carnivores. Subsequent criticism in the ecological literature demonstrated that many of the perceived patterns could not be statistically confirmed, thus calling into question this line of evidence for competition. More recent ecological literature relies on strong statistical analyses and careful consideration both of guild composition and of which morphological traits should be examined. This literature, resting largely on mammals, includes several cases that suggest a coevolutionary morphological response to interspecific competition. These studies have focused on the thropic apparatus directly related to food procurement by mammals — the teeth. Island mammals often show striking morphological patterns, some of which have been interpreted as resulting from release from competition with mainland species that have not reached islands. However, few of these patterns were critically evaluated to demonstrate their support for the hypothesis of character release. Despite several decades of interest and research, many questions regarding competitively induced morphological patterns remain unresolved and require further research. Mammals are especially promising subjects for such researh.     

Competition theory,evolution, and the concept of an ecological niche

This article examines some of the main tenets of competition theory in light of the theory of evolution and the concept of an ecological niche. The principle of competitive exclusion and the related assumption that communities exist at competitive equilibrium - fundamental parts of many competition theories and models - may be violated if non-equilibrium conditions exist in natural communities or are incorporated into competition models. Furthermore, these two basic tenets of competition theory are not compatible with the theory of evolution. Variation in ecologically significant environmental factors and non-equilibrium in population numbers should occur in most natural communities, and such changes have important effects on community relations, niche overlap, and the evolution of ecosystems. Ecologists should view competition as a process occurring within a complexdynamic system, and should be wary of theoretical positions built upon simple laboratory experiments or simplistic mathematical models.In considering the relationship between niche overlap and competition, niche overlap should not be taken as a sufficient condition for competition; many factors may prevent or diminish competition between populations with similar resource utilization patterns. The typically opposing forces of intraspecific and interspecific competition need to be simultaneously considered, for it is the balance between them that in large part determines niche boundaries.     

Coral species richness: ecological versus biogeographical influences

Species richness in communities varies with habitat area, productivity, disturbance level, intensity of species interactions, and regional/historical effects. All of these factors influence coral richness but their effects vary with spatial scale, position on the reef, and regional location. Species richness of corals along depth gradients shows a unimodal, hump-shaped curve that peaks at intermediate depths. Moreover, the peak of the curve is higher in regions with larger species pools. This “regional enrichment” of the local community appears in line transect samples as small as 10 m in length. The pattern suggests that ecological factors operating over scales of tens of meters and regional/historical factors operating over thousands of kilometers can both affect local richness. Regional factors probably include differences in speciation relative to extinction rates among regions and proximity of local sites to richness hotspots. Plausible factors operating at the local scale are species interactions, disturbance, and productivity which combine in different ways to produce the unimodal pattern. Shallow areas support few species because extinction rates are high due to frequent disturbance or because of environmental extremes. In addition, high productivity encourages rapid growth and thus the potential for intense interspecific competition. In areas where branching acroporids are abundant, exclusion by these dominant competitors is possible. Deep areas may be depauperate because few species can tolerate the low light levels found there. Areas of intermediate depth have the richest communities because they are open for colonization by many species and because extinction rates are low. Several theories may explain this “openness” and species persistence: 1. Occasional disturbance coupled with low growth rates results in glacially slow exclusion by the dominant competitor. 2. Aggregation of corals creates spatial variation in the intensity of competition and thus refuges from competition within a spatial landscape. Inferior competitors persist because they are superior at dispersal and refuge colonization. 3. Specialist predators focus on high-density juvenile populations near the parent, creating ecological space for colonization by non-prey. 4. Coral competitive abilities are roughly equal and recruitment into the community is a probabilistic event. The community thus exhibits random drift and exclusion is an extremely lengthy process. Based upon empirical evidence, these theories are listed in order of plausibility, but still need to be rigorously tested. Accepted: 9 September 1999     

Species co-existence and character divergence across carnivores

Co-occurring species might be morphologically similar because they are adapted to the same environment, or morphologically dissimilar to minimize competition. We use sister species comparisons to evaluate the relationship between morphological disparity and regional patterns of co-occurrence across carnivores. Up to 63% of the variation in range overlap can be explained by morphological divergence in dentition. Species that differ more in carnassial tooth length overlap more in their geographical range. Carnassials are the primary teeth associated with food processing, and hence difference in carnassial size may be a good indicator of difference in resource use. We suggest this pattern is consistent with competition in sympatry driving ecological character displacement, or competitive exclusion among ecologically similar species. Our study uses newly available data on global distributions, morphology and phylogeny, and is the first to demonstrate a close relationship between morphological disparity and co-occurrence at a regional scale encompassing multiple communities.     

How does the magnitude of genetic variation affect ecological and reproductive character displacement?

While previous studies on character displacement tended to focus on trait divergence and convergence as a result of long-term evolution, recent studies suggest that character displacement can be a special case of evolutionary rescue, where rapid evolution prevents species extinction by weakening interspecific competition. Here we analyzed a simple model to examine how the magnitude of genetic variation affects evolutionary rescue via ecological and reproductive character displacement that weakens interspecific competition in exploitation of shared resources (i.e., resource competition) and in the mating process caused by incomplete species recognition (i.e., reproductive interference), respectively. We found that slow trait divergence due to small genetic variance results in species extinction in reproductive character displacement but not in ecological character displacement. This is because one species becomes rare in slow character displacement, and this causes deterministic extinction due to minority disadvantage of reproductive interference. On the other hand, there is no deterministic extinction in the process of ecological character displacement. Furthermore, species extinction becomes less likely in the case of positive covariance between ecological and reproductive traits as divergence of the ecological trait (e.g., root depths) increases the divergence speed of the reproductive trait (e.g., flower colors) and vice versa. It will be interesting to compare intraspecific genetic (co)variance of ecological and reproductive traits in future studies for understanding how ecological and reproductive character displacement occur without extinction.     

Ecological character displacement caused by reproductive interference

We carried out a theoretical investigation of whether ecological character displacement can be caused by reproductive interference. Our model assumes that a quantitative character is associated with both resource use and species recognition, and that heterospecific mating incurs costs. The model shows that ecological character displacement can occur as a consequence of evolution of premating isolation; this conclusion is based on the premise that resource competition is less intense between species than within species and that the ecological character also contributes to premating isolation. When resource competition between species is intense, extinction of either species may occur by competitive exclusion before ecological character divergence. Some observational studies have shown that character displacement in body size is associated with not only resources use but also species recognition. We propose that body size displacement can occur as a consequence of evolution of premating isolation. Our results suggest that ecological character displacement results from reproductive character displacement.     

Predation and prey size choice by the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera: Carabidae): the dangers of extrapolating from laboratory to field

The impact of predation by the generalist carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) on populations of the field slug Deroceras reticulatum (Müller), and the effects of prey size on the predator-prey interaction, were measured under semi-field conditions. It was hypothesized that environmental heterogeneity would lead to very different patterns of comparative mortality than might be deduced from size choice experiments conducted in the laboratory. Results from outdoor mini-plots, emulating conditions in a field of wheat, demonstrated that P. melanarius significantly reduced numbers of slugs from all size classes, with no apparent preferences. This was in marked contrast to results from earlier laboratory studies, where this beetle fed preferentially on the smallest slugs. The slugs in the mini-plots ranged in size from 2-100 mg and the numbers in the mini-plot reflected the size frequency distribution in the field. Beetles in mini-plots containing high densities of slugs increased significantly in weight, in contrast to beetles in mini-plots with low slug density or no added slugs, which did not. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), using anti-slug monoclonal antibodies, showed that where there was a higher density of slugs there was more slug protein in the guts of the beetles. It was concluded that environmental heterogeneity probably provided a greater number and diversity of refugia for smaller than for larger slugs, counteracting laboratory-measured size preferences measured in arenas without refugia. These results have implications for a range of ecological studies involving inter- and intra-specific prey size choice, and emphasize the dangers of extrapolating from the laboratory to the field.     

Under which conditions is character displacement a likely outcome of secondary contact?

Sympatric character displacement is one possible mechanism that prevents competitive exclusion. This mechanism is thought to be behind the radiation of Darwin's finches, where character displacement is assumed to have followed secondary contact of ecologically similar species. We use a model to evaluate under which ecological and environmental conditions this mechanism is likely. Using the adaptive dynamics theory, we analyse different ecological models embedded in the secondary contact scenario. We highlight two necessary conditions for character displacement in sympatry: (i) very strong premating isolation between the two populations, and (ii) secondary contact to occur at an evolutionary branching point. Character displacement is then driven by adaptation to interspecific competition. We determine how ecological and environmental parameters influence the probability of ecological divergence. Finally, we discuss the likelihood of sympatric character displacement under disruptive selection in natural populations.     

Environmental determinism,and not interspecific competition,drives morphological variability in Australasian warblers (Acanthizidae)

Interspecific competition is thought to play a key role in determining the coexistence of closely related species within adaptive radiations. Competition for ecological resources can lead to different outcomes from character displacement to, ultimately, competitive exclusion. Accordingly, divergent natural selection should disfavor those species that are the most similar to their competitor in resource use, thereby increasing morphological disparity. Here, we examined ecomorphological variability within an Australo‐Papuan bird radiation, the Acanthizidae, which include both allopatric and sympatric complexes. In addition, we investigated whether morphological similarities between species are related to environmental factors at fine scale (foraging niche) and/or large scale (climate). Contrary to that predicted by the competition hypothesis, we did not find a significant correlation between the morphological similarities found between species and their degree of range overlap. Comparative modeling based on both a priori and data‐driven identification of selective regimes suggested that foraging niche is a poor predictor of morphological variability in acanthizids. By contrast, our results indicate that climatic conditions were an important factor in the formation of morphological variation. We found a significant negative correlation between species scores for PC1 (positively associated to tarsus length and tail length) and both temperature and precipitation, whereas PC2 (positively associated to bill length and wing length) correlated positively with precipitation. In addition, we found that species inhabiting the same region are closer to each other in morphospace than to species outside that region regardless of genus to which they belong or its foraging strategy. Our results indicate that the conservative body form of acanthizids is one that can work under a wide variety of environments (an all‐purpose morphology), and the observed interspecific similarity is probably driven by the common response to environment.     

Reproductive interference between animal species

Although sexual interactions between species (reproductive interference) have been reported from a wide range of animal taxa, their potential for determining species coexistence is often disregarded. Here, we review evidence from laboratory and field studies illustrating that heterospecific sexual interactions are frequently associated with fitness loss and can have severe ecological and evolutionary consequences. We define reproductive interference as any kind of interspecific interaction during the process of mate acquisition that adversely affects the fitness of at least one of the species involved and that is caused by incomplete species recognition. We distinguish seven types of reproductive interference: signal jamming, heterospecific rivalry, misdirected courtship, heterospecific mating attempts, erroneous female choice, heterospecific mating, and hybridization. We then discuss the sex-specific costs of these types and highlight two typical features of reproductive interference: density-dependence and asymmetry. Similar to competition, reproductive interference can lead to displacement of one species (sexual exclusion), spatial, temporal, or habitat segregation, changes in life history parameters, and reproductive character displacement. In many cases, patterns of coexistence might be shaped by reproductive interference rather than by resource competition, as the presence of a few heterospecifics might substantially decrease reproductive success. Therefore, interspecific sexual interactions should receive more attention in ecological research. Reproductive interference has mainly been discussed in the context of invasive species or hybrid zones, whereas its influence on naturally-occurring sympatric species pairs has rarely been addressed. To improve our knowledge of the ecological significance of reproductive interference, findings from laboratory experiments should be validated in the field. Future studies should also focus on ecological mechanisms, such as temporal spatial, or habitat partitioning, that might enable sexually interacting species to coexist. Reproductive interference also has implications for the management of endangered species, which can be threatened by sexual interactions with invasive or common species. Studies of reproductive interference might even provide new insights for biological pest control.     

Parallel evolution and ecological selection: replicated character displacement in spadefoot toads

Ecological character displacement—trait evolution stemming from selection to lessen resource competition between species—is most often inferred from a pattern in which species differ in resource-use traits in sympatry but not in allopatry, and in which sympatric populations within each species differ from conspecific allopatric populations. Yet, without information on population history, the presence of a divergent phenotype in multiple sympatric populations does not necessarily imply that there has been repeated evolution of character displacement. Instead, such a pattern may arise if there has been character displacement in a single ancestral population, followed by gene flow carrying the divergent phenotype into multiple, derived, sympatric populations. Here, we evaluate the likelihood of such historical events versus ongoing ecological selection in generating divergence in trophic morphology between multiple populations of spadefoot toad (Spea multiplicata) tadpoles that are in sympatry with a heterospecific and those that are in allopatry. We present both phylogenetic and population genetic evidence indicating that the same divergent trait, which minimizes resource competition with the heterospecific, has arisen independently in multiple sympatric populations. These data, therefore, provide strong indirect support for competition''s role in divergent trait evolution.     

武夷山风景名胜区景观生态安全度时空分异规律

以世界文化和自然遗产地武夷山中受自然和人类生态过程作用最为强烈和频繁的风景名胜区为研究对象,通过景观干扰度指数和景观脆弱度指数构建景观生态安全度指数, 并借助空间统计学方法对武夷山风景名胜区景观生态安全度的空间分布特征和变异规律进行探讨。结果表明:①1986-2009年武夷山风景名胜区景观生态安全度总体上呈递增趋势;②1986-2009年风景区景观生态安全度Morans's I表现为一定程度的正相关,1986-1997年间正相关关系明显增强,且景观生态安全度全局自相关存在尺度响应;③1997年和2009年风景区景观生态安全度局域自相关格局较一致,而景观生态安全度的集群结构及显著水平在1986-1997年间发生明显改变;④风景区各时期景观生态安全度所表现出较强的空间相关性是结构性因素和非结构性因素综合作用的结果,地形地貌、土壤类型等结构因素对风景区景观生态安全度的空间分布起决定性作用,而非结构因素(旅游开发建设、毁林种茶、弃农种茶等人类活动)对景观生态安全度的演变有重要影响。     

Evidence for large-scale effects of competition: niche displacement in Canada lynx and bobcat

Determining the patterns, causes and consequences of character displacement is central to our understanding of competition in ecological communities. However, the majority of competition research has occurred over small spatial extents or focused on fine-scale differences in morphology or behaviour. The effects of competition on broad-scale distribution and niche characteristics of species remain poorly understood but critically important. Using range-wide species distribution models, we evaluated whether Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) or bobcat (Lynx rufus) were displaced in regions of sympatry. Consistent with our prediction, we found that lynx niches were less similar to those of bobcat in areas of sympatry versus allopatry, with a stronger reliance on snow cover driving lynx niche divergence in the sympatric zone. By contrast, bobcat increased niche breadth in zones of sympatry, and bobcat niches were equally similar to those of lynx in zones of sympatry and allopatry. These findings suggest that competitively disadvantaged species avoid competition at large scales by restricting their niche to highly suitable conditions, while superior competitors expand the diversity of environments used. Our results indicate that competition can manifest within climatic niche space across species’ ranges, highlighting the importance of biotic interactions occurring at large spatial scales on niche dynamics.     

Does competition drive character differences between species on a macroevolutionary scale?

Sympatric sister species generally have a degree of phenotypic differentiation that allows them to coexist. It has been well documented that phenotypic similarity results, through resource competition, in one of two major outcomes: local extinction of either competitor or character displacement. Limiting similarity suggests that there is a maximum degree of phenotypic niche overlap with which similar species may coexist. Breaching that maximum would result in exclusion. Character displacement, on the other hand, implies that the species differentiate phenotypically so that resource competition is reduced to the point where coexistence is possible. While it has been suggested that these theories have the potential to accelerate (character displacement) or limit phenotypic evolution (competitive exclusion) on microevolutionary time scales, their effects on macroevolution remain under‐studied. If competition accelerates evolution on a macroevolutionary scale, one would expect that phenotypic diversity increases as novel species ‘push aside’ existing species. On the other hand, one might also expect that phenotypic evolution comes to a halt as novel species are trapped in the (ever decreasing) phenotypic space not yet occupied by existing species, except at the extremes of the phenotypic spectrum. Studying the current geographical ranges of more than 3000 extant species representing 29 mammalian families and their respective body masses, I found little evidence of competition accelerating body size differentiation between species.     

Spatial patterns,ecological niches,and interspecific competition of avian brood parasites: inferring from a case study of Korea

Since obligate avian brood parasites depend completely on the effort of other host species for rearing their progeny, the availability of hosts will be a critical resource for their life history. Circumstantial evidence suggests that intense competition for host species may exist not only within but also between species. So far, however, few studies have demonstrated whether the interspecific competition really occurs in the system of avian brood parasitism and how the nature of brood parasitism is related to their niche evolution. Using the occurrence data of five avian brood parasites from two sources of nationwide bird surveys in South Korea and publically available environmental/climatic data, we identified their distribution patterns and ecological niches, and applied species distribution modeling to infer the effect of interspecific competition on their spatial distribution. We found that the distribution patterns of five avian brood parasites could be characterized by altitude and climatic conditions, but overall their spatial ranges and ecological niches extensively overlapped with each other. We also found that the predicted distribution areas of each species were generally comparable to the realized distribution areas, and the numbers of individuals in areas where multiple species were predicted to coexist showed positive relationships among species. In conclusion, despite following different coevolutionary trajectories to adapt to their respect host species, five species of avian brood parasites breeding in South Korea occupied broadly similar ecological niches, implying that they tend to conserve ancestral preferences for ecological conditions. Furthermore, our results indicated that contrary to expectation interspecific competition for host availability between avian brood parasites seemed to be trivial, and thus, play little role in shaping their spatial distributions and ecological niches. Future studies, including the complete ranges of avian brood parasites and ecological niches of host species, will be worthwhile to further elucidate these issues.     

An ecological study of the pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Yalosidi,Republic of Zaire

The pygmy chimpanzees of Yalosidi, near the southeastern limit of the range of this species, differ in group size, food habit, nesting behavior, response to humans, etc., from those of other localities (Wamba, Lomako, and Lake Tumba). It is inferred that the pygmy chimpanzee has a wide range of ecological variation. A comprehensive use of the habitat was characteristic of the Yalosidi pygmy chimpanzees. Every stratum of every vegetation type in their habitat was used by them for feeding, resting, or sleeping. The wide ecological niche of pygmy chimpanzees probably permits their survival in competition with other nonhuman primates of Yalosidi, which are more agile but confined to more limited niches.     

Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation

Ecological character displacement, mostly seen as increased differences of size in sympatry between closely‐related or similar species, is a focal hypothesis assuming that species too similar to one another could not coexist without diverging, owing to interspecific competition. Thus, ecological character displacement and community‐wide character displacement (overdispersion in size of potential competitors within ecological guilds) were at the heart of the debate regarding the role of competition in structuring ecological communities. The debate has focused on the evidence presented in earlier studies and generated a new generation of rigorous, critical studies of communities. Character displacement research in the past two decades provides sound statistical support for the hypothesis in a wide variety of taxa, albeit with a phylogenetically skewed representation. A growing number of studies are strongly based in functional morphology, and some also demonstrate actual morphologically related resource partitioning. Phylogenetic models and experimental work have added to the scope and depth of earlier research, as have theoretical studies. However, many challenging ecological and evolutionary issues, regarding both selective forces (at the inter‐ and intraspecific level) and resultant patterns, remain to be addressed. Ecological character displacement and community‐wide character displacement are here to stay as the focus of much exciting research.     

Quasi-Local Competition in Stage-Structured Metapopulations: A New Mechanism of Pattern Formation

A central question of ecology is what determines the presence and abundance of species at different locations. In cases of ecological pattern formation, population sizes are largely determined by spatially distributed interactions and may have very little to do with the habitat template. We find pattern formation in a single-species metapopulation model with quasi-local competition, but only if the populations have (at least) two age or stage classes. Quasi-local competition is modeled using an explicit resource competition model with fast resource dynamics, and assuming that adults, but not juveniles, spend a fraction of their foraging time in habitat patches adjacent to their home patch. Pattern formation occurs if one stage class depletes the common resource but the shortage of resource affects mostly the other stage. When the two stages are spatially separated due to quasi-local competition, this results in competitive exclusion between the populations. We find deep similarity between spatial pattern formation and population cycles due to competitive exclusion between cohorts of biennial species, and discuss the differences between the present mechanism and established ways of pattern formation such as diffusive instability and distributed competition with local Allee-effects.     

中国重大生态工程近40年生态成效整合分析

我国持续推进实施了系列大规模重大生态工程,科学评估工程取得的成效对于及时掌握工程实际效果是否符合预期目标、针对性地改进优化工程管理措施、促进生态保护修复目标的实现等具有重要意义。通过文献整合分析,从生态系统质量、功能和生物多样性等方面综合评估我国10项重大生态工程的生态成效,辨析取得成效的驱动因素贡献差异并总结成效评估产生不确定性的原因。结果表明:工程在国土绿化、碳固定、土壤保持、水源涵养、生物多样性保护等方面产生了良好生态效益,促进工程区植被覆盖度增加(0.19%-26%),生物量(-13%-187%)、固碳量(-7.41%-200%)、土壤保持量(-26.91%-151.52%)、水源涵养量(-64.66%-80.24%)、物种丰富度(-16%-441%)、均匀度指数(-6%-28%)和多样性指数(-5%-315%)总体也呈增加趋势(多年变化率中值>0)。但在部分区域也引起了生物量下降、土壤保持能力降低、水文效益减弱、生物多样性损失等问题。生态工程与气候变化的相对贡献率比值在0.06-3.60之间,贡献大小存在明显的空间分异并且产生交互耦合作用,多因素耦合作用分解机制仍有待研究。评估对象、数据、尺度、基准、方法及驱动因素拆解差异使得评估结果不确定性极大,相关研究需要重点关注评估基准和尺度的选择、多源数据的融合及同化、工程评估技术体系的改进,综合考虑区域地带性差异、工程措施适宜性和有效性、生态系统服务权衡、驱动因素贡献空间分异等以调整优化工程措施。