Separate neural systems mediate the steroid-dependent and steroid-independent suppression of tonic luteinizing hormone secretion in the anestrous ewe

In the ewe, two types of seasonal fluctuations in secretion of tonic luteinizing hormone (LH) have been described: a steroid-dependent change whereby estradiol gains the capacity to suppress LH pulse frequency in anestrus, and a steroid-independent decrease in pulse frequency in ovariectomized animals during anestrus. We have proposed that the former reflects activation, in anestrus, of estradiol-sensitive catecholaminergic neurons that inhibit gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Three results reported here support this hypothesis: dopaminergic (pimozide) and alpha-adrenergic (phenoxybenzamine) antagonists increased LH in intact anestrous ewes without altering pituitary responses to GnRH; other dopaminergic (fluphenazine) and alpha-adrenergic (dibenamine) antagonists also increased LH in anestrus; agonists for dopaminergic (apomorphine) and alpha-adrenergic (clonidine) receptors suppressed LH secretion in both seasons, suggesting that the appropriate receptors are present in breeding-season ewes. In contrast, catecholamines do not appear to mediate the steroid-independent suppression of pulse frequency; neither pimozide nor phenoxybenzamine increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes during anestrus. When antagonists for 6 other neurotransmitter receptors (muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic, GABAnergic, serotonergic, opioid, and beta-adrenergic) were tested in anestrus, only cyproheptadine, the serotonergic antagonist, increased pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes. Cyproheptadine had no effect on frequency during the breeding season. On the basis of these results, we propose that the steroid-dependent and -independent actions of anestrous photoperiod occur via catecholaminergic and serotonergic neurons, respectively.     

Effects of pentobarbital anesthesia on tonic luteinizing hormone secretion in the ewe: evidence for active inhibition of luteinizing hormone in anestrus

In the ewe, seasonal anestrus appears to result from two effects of inhibitory photoperiod: 1) estradiol gains the capacity to suppress luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency and hence becomes a potent inhibitor of tonic LH secretion and 2) a steroid-independent decrease in LH pulse frequency occurs in ovariectomized ewes. In this study, we have obtained evidence, using pentobarbital anesthesia, that both these actions of photoperiod reflect the activation, in anestrus, of an inhibitory neural system. Administration of pentobarbital to intact anestrous ewes produced a dramatic, 3-fold increase in LH pulse frequency during the 6 h of anesthesia. In contrast, during the breeding season, pentobarbital inhibited LH pulse frequency in luteal phase animals. There was also a seasonal variation in the effects of pentobarbital in ovariectomized ewes. During the breeding season this drug again suppressed LH secretion, inhibiting both LH pulse amplitude and frequency. In anestrus, pentobarbital also suppressed pulse amplitude, but it produced a transitory increase (lasting 3 h) in pulse frequency. To account for the stimulatory actions of pentobarbital, we propose that in anestrus, but not the breeding season, LH pulse frequency is held in check by a set of estradiol-sensitive inhibitory neurons. Further, we suggest that these neurons are activated by inhibitory photoperiod and account for both the steroid-dependent and steroid-independent actions of photoperiod.     

Evidence that estrogen receptor alpha,but not beta,mediates seasonal changes in the response of the ovine retrochiasmatic area to estradiol

In ewes, anestrus results from a reduction in LH pulsatility due to an increased sensitivity of the hypothalamic estradiol negative feedback system. Considerable evidence has implicated the A15 group of dopaminergic neurons in the retrochiasmatic area in this seasonally dependent estradiol effect. Moreover, estradiol administered to the retrochiasmatic area in ovariectomized anestrous ewes inhibits LH secretion. However, A15 neurons do not appear to contain the classical estrogen receptors (ERalpha). Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that beta-estrogen receptors mediate the action of estradiol in the retrochiasmatic area by comparing the effects of estradiol and genistein, a selective ERbeta agonist. We also examined whether there are seasonal changes in response of the retrochiasmatic area to these agonists and if these effects are mediated by dopamine. To test these hypotheses, ovariectomized ewes were implanted with bilateral guide cannulae targeting the retrochiasmatic area. Crystalline agonists were administered via microimplants inserted down the cannulae. Blood samples taken before and 4 days after microimplant insertion were analyzed for LH concentrations, pulse frequency, and amplitude. Genistein treatment produced no significant change in LH levels in either season. Estradiol treatment decreased both mean LH concentrations and pulse frequency in anestrous but not breeding-season ewes. Administration of the dopamine antagonist sulpiride to ovariectomized ewes with estradiol microimplants in the retrochiasmatic area returned LH pulse frequency to levels indistinguishable from controls. From these data, we hypothesize that estradiol acts on local ERalpha-containing neurons in this area to stimulate a dopaminergic pathway that inhibits LH secretion during anestrus.     

Does the seasonal increase in estradiol negative feedback prevent luteinizing hormone surges in anestrous ewes by suppressing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency?

To test the hypothesis that the anestrous increase in estradiol negative feedback prevents estrous cycles by suppressing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency, a variety of regimens of increasing GnRH pulse frequency were administered to anestrous ewes for 3 days. A luteinizing hormone (LH) surge was induced in 45 of 46 ewes regardless of amplitude or frequency of GnRH pulses, but only 19 had luteal phases. Estradiol administration induced LH surges in 6 of 6 ewes, only 3 having luteal phases. Anestrous luteal phase progesterone profiles were similar in incidence, time course, and amplitude to those of the first luteal phases of the breeding season, which in turn had lower progesterone maxima than late breeding season luteal phases. In the remaining ewes, progesterone increased briefly or not at all, the increases being similar to the transient rises in progesterone occurring in most ewes at the onset of the breeding season. These results demonstrate that increasing GnRH pulse frequency induces LH surges in anestrus and that the subsequent events are similar to those at the beginning of the breeding season. Finally, they support the hypothesis that the negative feedback action of estradiol prevents cycles in anestrus by suppressing the frequency of the hypothalamic pulse generator.     

Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in the ewe: relationship of frequency of LH pulses to day length and response to estradiol negative feedback

Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized ewes were examined over the course of 2 yr in relation to annual changes in environmental photoperiod, shifts in response to estradiol negative feedback control of LH secretion, and timing of the breeding season. Under natural environmental conditions, the frequency of LH pulses in individual ovariectomized ewes changed gradually and in close association with the annual cycle of day length. As days became shorter in late summer and autumn, LH pulse frequency increased; conversely, as day length increased in late winter and spring, frequency declined. Under artificial conditions in which ovariectomized ewes were exposed to different photoperiods, a similar inverse relationship was observed between day length and LH pulse frequency. The seasonal changes in frequency of LH pulses in ovariectomized ewes, although symmetric with the annual photoperiodic cycle, were not temporally coupled to the dramatic shifts in response to estradiol feedback inhibition of LH secretion at the transitions between breeding season and anestrus. The feedback shifts occurred abruptly and at times when LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes was at, or near, the annual maximum or minimum. The tight coupling between LH pulse frequency and photoperiod leads to the conclusion that there is a photoperiodic drive to the LH pulse-generating system of the ewe. The temporal dissociation between changes in this photoperiodic drive and the seasonal shifts in response to estradiol negative feedback support the hypothesis that the neuroendocrine basis for these two phenomena is not one and the same.     

Effects of an opioid antagonist on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the ewe vary with changes in steroid negative feedback

In ewes during the breeding season, estradiol (E) and progesterone (P) synergistically regulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. E primarily inhibits LH pulse amplitude and P inhibits LH pulse frequency. To determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) mediate these negative feedback effects, we administered the long-acting opioid antagonist WIN 44,441-3 (WIN) to intact ewes during the luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle and to ovariectomized ewes treated with no steroids, E, P, or E plus P. Steroid levels were maintained at levels seen during the estrous cycle by Silastic implants placed shortly after surgery. WIN increased LH pulse frequency, but not amplitude, in luteal phase ewes. In contrast, during the follicular phase, LH pulse amplitude was increased by WIN and pulse frequency was unchanged. Neither LH pulse frequency nor pulse amplitude was affected by WIN in long-term ovariectomized ewes untreated with steroids. In contrast, WIN slightly increased LH pulse frequency in short-term ovariectomized ewes. WIN also increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes treated with P or E plus P. WIN did not affect pulse frequency but did increase LH pulse amplitude in E-treated ewes. These results support the hypothesis that EOP participate in the negative feedback effects of E and P on pulsatile LH secretion during the breeding season and that the inhibitory effects of EOP may persist for some time after ovariectomy.     

Thyroid hormones mediate steroid-independent seasonal changes in luteinizing hormone pulsatility in the ewe

Thyroid hormones permit the increase in response to estradiol negative feedback in ewes at the transition to anestrus. In this study, we tested whether the thyroid hormones are also required for steroid-independent seasonal changes in pulsatile LH secretion. In experiment 1, Suffolk ewes were ovariectomized and thyroidectomized (THX) or ovariectomized only (controls) in late November. LH pulse frequency and amplitude were measured for 4 h in December, April, May, June, and August. Pulse frequency was also measured in the presence of estradiol-containing implants during the breeding (December) and early anestrus (March) seasons. As expected, in the presence of estradiol, pulse frequency declined between December and March in control but not THX ewes. In the absence of estradiol, a seasonal decline in frequency and an increase in amplitude occurred in control ewes, concurrent with lengthening photoperiod. A similar trend was seen in THX ewes, but the seasonal changes were lower in magnitude and not significant. In experiment 2, the same protocol was used (pulse measurements in December, May, and June) with a larger THX group size (n = 7). Results were similar to those of experiment 1 for controls. In THX ewes, pulse frequency did not change over time and was significantly elevated relative to that of controls during the summer. Pulse amplitude in THX ewes tended to increase during summer and did not differ from pulse amplitudes in control ewes. These results demonstrate that thyroid hormones are required for steroid-independent cycles in LH pulse frequency; however, some seasonal changes in amplitude still occur in the absence of thyroid hormones. This finding contrasts with the changes in estradiol negative feedback at the transition to anestrus, which are entirely thyroid hormone dependent.     

Steroid feedback inhibition of pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the ewe

The long-term negative feedback effects of sustained elevations in circulating estradiol and progesterone on the pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were evaluated in the ewe following ovariectomy during the mid-late anestrous and early breeding seasons. GnRH secretion was monitored in serial samples of hypophyseal portal blood. Steroids were administered from the time of ovariectomy by s.c. Silastic implants, which maintained plasma concentrations of estradiol and progesterone at levels resembling those that circulate during the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle; control ewes did not receive steroidal replacement. Analysis of hormonal pulse patterns in serial samples during 6-h periods on Days 8-10 after ovariectomy disclosed discrete, concurrent pulses of GnRH in hypothalamo-hypophyseal portal blood and LH in peripheral blood of untreated ovariectomized ewes. These pulses occurred every 97 min on the average. Treatment with either estradiol or progesterone greatly diminished or abolished detectable pulsatile secretion of GnRH and LH, infrequent pulses being evident in only 3 of 19 steroid-treated ewes. No major seasonal difference was observed in GnRH or LH pulse patterns in any group of ewes. Our findings in the ovariectomized ewe provide direct support for the conclusion that the negative-feedback effects of estradiol and progesterone on gonadotropin secretion in the ewe include an action on the brain and a consequent inhibition of pulsatile GnRH secretion.     

The role of nutrition in the regulation of LH secretion during anestrus by the serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems in Mediterranean ewes treated with melatonin

The steroid-dependent inhibition of LH secretion involves dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems but it is unclear how the plane of nutrition affects this inhibition during anestrus in melatonin treated ewes. Melatonin implants (18 mg) were inserted (Day 0) into ovariectomized, estradiol treated adult Rasa Aragonesa ewes on a high (H; n = 8) or low energy diet (L; n = 6) which were applied in early anestrus (Day 29-57) and late anestrus (Day 90-104). Cyproheptadine (0.1 mg/ kg), a serotoninergic (SHT2) receptor antagonist, was administered in early and late anestrus (Day 50 and 107) followed by pimozide (0.08 mg/kg), a dopaminergic2 receptor antagonist (Day 57 and 114). The H ewes had significantly higher LH concentrations (P < 0.05) before cyproheptadine treatment in early anestrus. The H and L ewes responded in a similar way to the antagonists in both early and late anestrus, except for L ewes who had a higher LH pulse amplitude after pimozide treatment in both periods (P < 0.05). During early anestrus, cyproheptadine tended to increase (P = 0.06) LH pulse frequency in L ewes and LH concentrations in H ewes. The LH secretion also increased in L ewes after pimozide administration during early anestrus (P < 0.05 for mean LH concentrations and LH pulse frequency and amplitude). However, pimozide dramatically increased LH secretion during late anestrus (Day 114) irrespective of the plane of nutrition (P = 0.06-0.08 for LH pulse frequency and P < 0.05 for LH concentrations and pulse amplitude). In melatonin treated Mediterranean ewes, the plane of nutrition appeared to modify the effect of dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems on the steroid-dependent inhibition of LH secretion throughout anestrus.     

Postpubertal maturation of endogenous opioid regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion in the female sheep

This study investigated whether the role of endogenous opioid peptides in the suppression of LH secretion during seasonal anestrus in the sheep changes with age. The experimental approach was to determine the effect of blockade of opioid receptors with naloxone on LH secretion at different times of year within the anestrous season, and to compare responses between seasonally anestrous sheep of different ages. Sheep, all past the normal age of puberty, were ovariectomized before the study and treated s.c. with estradiol implants to provide a fixed estradiol feedback signal. One-year-old females responded to naloxone with a rapid increase in LH pulse frequency in the early (April) and late (August) phases of their first anestrous season. This response was similar to that previously found in prepubertal female sheep. Only 5 of the 8 females responded to the same naloxone challenge in mid anestrus (June), suggesting that the contribution of opioid pathways to the inhibition of LH secretion at this time of year is not necessarily the same as that in early and late anestrus. None of the older anestrous sheep (greater than or equal to 2 yr) responded to naloxone in June, indicating age-related changes in the role of endogenous opioid mechanisms in the inhibition of LH secretion. Ovary-intact mature sheep did not respond to naloxone, in contrast to our previous observations in intact prepubertal females. We infer that the neural mechanisms underlying the superficially similar hypogonadotropic states that occur during the prepubertal period, first anestrous season, and later anestrous seasons are not identical.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Does season alter responsiveness of the reproductive neuroendocrine axis to the suppressive actions of cortisol in ovariectomized ewes?

Season can profoundly influence activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and alter reproductive neuroendocrine responsiveness to stress and gonadal steroids. Here we tested the hypothesis that the inhibitory effect of a stress-like increment in plasma concentration of the adrenal steroid cortisol on pulsatile LH secretion varies with season. LH pulse patterns were monitored prior to and during the administration of cortisol in the same seven ovariectomized ewes during three stages of the yearly breeding cycle: breeding season, transition to anestrus, and midanestrus. The elevation in cortisol mimicked the rise in plasma level of cortisol in response to an immune/inflammatory stress. During all three seasons, cortisol acutely suppressed the pulsatile release of LH. This inhibition reflected a marked reduction of LH pulse amplitude and a minimal suppression of LH pulse frequency. Of interest, the suppressive effect of this physiologic increment in cortisol did not vary across seasons. This provides initial evidence that, in ovariectomized ewes, cortisol-induced suppression of pulsatile LH secretion differs from that of gonadal steroids in that it is not profoundly influenced by season.     

Different neuroendocrine systems modulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in photosuppressed and photorefractory ewes.

The objective of this study was to determine whether two photoperiod regimens that induce anestrus in the ewe-short-day photorefractoriness (SDPR) and long-day photosuppression (LDPS)--act by different neuronal mechanisms. In separate experiments, ovary-intact (INTACT), ovariectomized (OVX), and ovariectomized estradiol-treated (OVX + E) ewes were subjected to three different photoperiodic regimens that resulted in reproductive quiescence: (1) exposure to long days (16L:8D), which caused photosuppression (INTACT, n = 9; OVX, n = 6; OVX + E, n = 5; (2) prolonged exposure to short days (10L:14D)), which caused photorefractoriness (INTACT, n = 10; OVX, n = 6; OVX + E, n = 5); (3) exposure to natural photoperiod, which induced seasonal anestrus (INTACT, n = 11; OVX, n = 6; OVX + E, n = 5). Effect of photoregimen was monitored by measuring progesterone or LH. Drug challenges were made after two sequential estrous cycles were missed in INTACT ewes, after mean LH concentrations dropped below 1 ng/ml in OVX + E ewes, and after LH interpulse intervals increased in OVX ewes. Effects of drug on LH pulse pattern were determined by taking blood samples at 12-min intervals for 8 h after i.v. diluent injection; then for 8 h after i.v. injection of cyproheptadine, a serotonin antagonist (3 mg/kg); and again 7 days later after i.v. injection of diluent or pimozide, a dopamine antagonist (0.25 mg/kg). Cyproheptadine had little effect except to decrease (p = 0.05) mean LH in INTACT anestrous ewes and decrease (p less than 0.01) pulse amplitude in OVX + E SDPR ewes. Pimozide did not affect LH pulse frequency in LDPS ewes. However, pimozide increased LH pulse frequency (p less than 0.005) and mean concentrations (p less than 0.005) in SDPR OVX + E ewes, whereas it suppressed LH pulse frequency (p less than 0.05) and amplitude (p less than 0.03) in SDPR INTACT and SDPR OVX ewes. The results suggest that (1) the role of the dopaminergic system differs in SDPR and LDPS ewes, and that different neuronal systems may effect SDPR and LDPS, (2) the effect of pimozide in SDPR ewes is altered by ovarian steroids, and (3) the serotonergic system has relatively little role in regulating pulsatile LH secretion in any of the three different states of anestrus.     

Psychosocial stress suppresses attractivity, proceptivity and pulsatile LH secretion in the ewe

Various stressors suppress pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) in ewes and cortisol has been shown to be a mediator of this effect under various conditions. In contrast, little is known about the impact of stress and cortisol on sexual behavior in the ewe. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that both psychosocial stress and stress-like levels of cortisol will reduce the level of attractivity, proceptivity and receptivity in addition to suppressing LH secretion in the ewe. In Experiment 1, a layered stress paradigm of psychosocial stress was used, consisting of isolation for 4 h with the addition of restraint, blindfold and noise of a barking dog (predator stress) at hourly intervals. This stress paradigm reduced LH pulse amplitude in ovariectomized ewes. In Experiment 2, ovariectomized ewes were artificially induced into estrus with progesterone and estradiol benzoate treatment and the layered stress paradigm was applied. LH was measured and sexual behavior was assessed using T-mazes and mating tests. Stress reduced pulsatile LH secretion, and also reduced attractivity and proceptivity of ewes but had no effect on receptivity. In Experiment 3, ewes artificially induced into estrus were infused with cortisol for 30 h. Cortisol elevated circulating plasma concentrations of cortisol, delayed the onset of estrus and resulted in increased circling behavior of ewes (i.e. moderate avoidance) during estrus and increased investigation and courtship from rams. There was no effect of cortisol on attractivity, proceptivity or receptivity during estrus. We conclude that psychosocial stress inhibits LH secretion, the ability of ewes to attract rams (attractivity) and the motivation of ewes to seek rams and initiate mating (proceptivity), but cortisol is unlikely to be the principal mediator of these effects.     

Changes in pulsatile LH secretion after ovariectomy in Ile-de-France ewes in two seasons

Two experiments were conducted in Ile-de-France ewes to study changes in pulsatile LH secretion in ewes ovariectomized during anoestrus or during the midluteal phase of the oestrous cycle. In Exp. 1, blood samples were taken every 20 min for 12 h the day before ovariectomy (Day 0). After ovariectomy, samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group), on Days 1, 3, 7 and 15. In Exp. 2 samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group) on Days 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 after ovariectomy. Further samples were taken (5 ewes per group) at 9 and 12 months after ovariectomy. There were significant interactions between season and day of sampling for the interval between LH pulses in both experiments. LH pulse frequency increased within 1 day of ovariectomy and the increase was more rapid during the breeding season. There were clear seasonal differences in pulse frequency in Exp. 2. Compared with ewes ovariectomized in anoestrus, pulse frequency was significantly higher for ewes ovariectomized in the breeding season, from Day 7 until Day 120. Once pulse frequency had increased in ewes about the time of the normal breeding season, pulse frequency remained high and subsequent seasonal changes were greatly reduced. Pulse amplitude increased immediately after ovariectomy to reach a maximum on Day 7 and there were no differences between season of ovariectomy in the initial changes in amplitude. In Exp. 2, changes in amplitude followed changes in pulse interval and there was a significant interaction between season and day of sampling. There were no significant effects of season on nadir LH concentrations which increased throughout the duration of the experiments. These results show that, in ovariectomized ewes, LH pulse frequency observed on a given day depends on time after ovariectomy, season at the time of sampling and on previous exposure of ewes to stimulatory effects of season. The direct effects of season on LH pulse frequency and seasonal changes in sensitivity to steroid feedback may contribute to control of the breeding season and their relative contributions to the beginning and end of the breeding season may differ.     

Ovarian steroid hormone involvement in endogenous opioid modulation of LH secretion in mature ewes during the breeding and non-breeding seasons

The opioid antagonist WIN-44441-3 (WIN-3, Sterling-Winthrop) caused significant increases in LH secretion in ovariectomized ewes treated with progesterone but not in ovariectomized animals treated with oestradiol-17 beta. In the non-breeding season, plasma LH concentrations in ovariectomized ewes without steroid therapy, given oestradiol-17 beta or oestradiol-17 beta and progesterone together were not affected by treatment with WIN-3 on Day 6 after ovariectomy (there was a significant increase in LH as a result of WIN-3 treatment 13 days after ovariectomy in sheep given no steroid therapy). However, WIN-3 treatment of ovariectomized sheep given progesterone resulted in a significant increase in plasma LH. WIN-3 was ineffective when given to intact ewes treated with progesterone during the non-breeding season. With ovariectomized sheep during the breeding season there was again no response to WIN-3 at 6 days after ovariectomy in sheep given oestradiol-17 beta, but significant LH elevations in animals given no steroid, those given progesterone and those given progesterone + oestradiol-17 beta. The lack of an LH response to WIN-3 in ovariectomized sheep treated with oestradiol-17 beta did not result from a reduced pituitary response to GnRH since such animals responded normally to exogenous GnRH treatment. Overall, these results are consistent with the idea that, irrespective of the time of year, progesterone exerts negative feedback upon LH release at least in part through an opioidergic mechanism, whereas oestradiol-17 beta exerts negative feedback through steps unlikely to involve opioids. Progesterone can override the effect of oestradiol-17 beta during the breeding season only. Further, there appears to be a steroid-independent opioid involvement in LH suppression, operating at both times of year.     

Pulsatile LH secretion and ovarian follicular wave emergence and growth in anestrous ewes

The objective of this study was to determine if pulsatile LH secretion was needed for ovarian follicular wave emergence and growth in the anestrous ewe. In Experiment 1, ewes were either large or small (10 × 0.47 or 5 × 0.47 cm, respectively; n = 5/group) sc implants releasing estradiol-17 beta for 10 d (Day 0 = day of implant insertion), to suppress pulsed LH secretion, but not FSH secretion. Five sham-operated control ewes received no implants. In Experiment 2, 12 ewes received large estradiol-releasing implants for 12 d (Day 0 = day of implant insertion); six were given GnRH (200 ng IV) every 4 h for the last 6 d that the implants were in place (to reinitiate pulsed LH secretion) whereas six Control ewes were given saline. Ovarian ultrasonography and blood sampling were done daily; blood samples were also taken every 12 min for 6 h on Days 5 and 9, and on Days 6 and 12 of the treatment period in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Treatment with estradiol blocked pulsatile LH secretion (P < 0.001). In Experiment 1, implant treatment halted follicular wave emergence between Days 2 and 10. In Experiment 2, follicular waves were suppressed during treatment with estradiol, but resumed following GnRH treatment. In both experiments, the range of peaks in serum FSH concentrations that preceded and triggered follicular wave emergence was almost the same as control ewes and those given estradiol implants alone or with GnRH; mean concentrations did not differ (P < 0.05). We concluded that some level of pulsatile LH secretion was required for the emergence of follicular waves that were triggered by peaks in serum FSH concentrations in the anestrous ewe.     

Gonadotrophin release in ovariectomized ewes fed different amounts of coumestrol

Three experiments were conducted to study changes in pulsatile secretion of LH and FSH during the breeding season or anoestrus in ovariectomized Ile-de-France ewes fed different amounts of the phyto-oestrogen coumestrol. In Exp. 1, conducted during the breeding season, ewes (3-4 per group) were fed lucerne supplying 4, 18 or 30 mg coumestrol per ewe per day for 15 days. Experiments 2 and 3 were conducted during seasonal anoestrus. In Exp. 2, ewes (4 per group) were fed lucerne supplying coumestrol concentrations ranging from 4 to 38 mg/ewe/day for 15 days. In Exp. 3, ewes (10 per group) were fed lucerne supplying 14 or 125 mg coumestrol/ewe/day for 15 days. During the breeding season, an increased concentration of coumestrol in the diet significantly decreased the amplitude of LH pulses. There were no effects on LH pulse frequency or on FSH concentrations. During seasonal anoestrus, there were no significant effects on LH pulse frequency, or amplitude and no significant effect on FSH concentration. These results show that high concentrations of coumestrol in lucerne diets would not explain seasonal variation in LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes. However, lucerne diets with increased coumestrol concentrations can influence LH release during the breeding season.     

Effects of breed, ovarian steroids and season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

The effects of season and of oestradiol and progesterone on the tonic secretion of LH were studied in ovariectomized Merino and Suffolk ewes, two breeds which differ markedly in the seasonal pattern of their reproductive activity. In the absence of exogenous steroids, the frequency of LH pulses was lower and the amplitude of the pulses was higher in anoestrus than in the breeding season for Merino and Suffolk ewes 30 days after ovariectomy. In long-term (190 days) ovariectomized ewes, this seasonal change in LH secretion was observed in Suffolk ewes only. During seasonal anoestrus, treatment of ewes with subcutaneous oestradiol-17 beta implants (3, 6 or 12 mm in length) decreased the frequency of LH pulses in a dose-dependent manner, with Suffolk ewes being far more sensitive to the inhibitory effects of oestradiol than Merino ewes. The lowest dose of oestradiol (3 mm) had no effect on the secretion of LH in Merino ewes, but reduced secretion in Suffolk ewes. Treatment of ewes with the highest dose of oestradiol (12 mm) completely abolished LH pulses in Suffolk ewes, whereas infrequent pulses remained evident in Merino ewes. During the breeding season, oestradiol alone had no effect on the pulsatile release of LH in either breed, but in combination with progesterone there was a significant reduction in LH pulse frequency. Progesterone effectively decreased LH secretion in both breeds in both seasons. It was concluded that differences between breeds in the 'depth' of anoestrus could be related to differences in the sensitivity of the hypothalamus to both negative feedback by oestradiol and the direct effects of photoperiod.     

Effect of transport on pulsatile LH release in ovariectomized ewes with or without prior steroid exposure at different times of year

The initial aim of the present study was to test whether the stress of transport suppresses LH pulsatile secretion in ewes. In a pilot experiment in the late breeding season, transport resulted in an unexpected response in three out of five transported, ovariectomized ewes pretreated with oestradiol and progesterone. Before transport, seasonal suppression of LH pulses had occurred earlier than anticipated, but LH pulsatility suddenly restarted for the period of transport. This finding was reminiscent of unexplained results obtained in ovariectomized ewes infused centrally with high doses of corticotrophin-releasing hormone after pretreatment with low doses of oestradiol with or without progesterone. Hence, an additional aim of the present study was to examine whether these latter results with corticotrophin-releasing hormone could be reproduced by increasing endogenous corticotrophin-releasing hormone secretion by transport. Subsequent experiments used groups of at least eight ovariectomized ewes at different times of the year with or without prior exposure to steroids to assess whether these unexpected observations were associated with season or the prevailing endocrine milieu. In the mid-breeding season, transport for 4 h in the absence of steroid pretreatment for 8 months reduced LH pulse frequency from 7.5 +/- 0.3 to 6.3 +/- 0.4 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) and LH pulse amplitude from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.3 ng ml-1 (P < 0.05). Similarly, in the mid-breeding season, 34 h after the cessation of pretreatment with oestradiol and progesterone, transport suppressed LH pulse frequency from 6.1 +/- 0.4 to 5.5 +/- 0.3 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) with a tendency of effect on amplitude (6.2 +/- 2.7 to 2.61 +/- 0.6 ng ml-1; P = 0.07; note the large variance in the pretransport data). During mid-anoestrus, evidence of a suppressive effect of transport was only observed on LH pulse amplitude (4.7 +/- 0.6 versus 3.0 +/- 0.5 pulses per 4 h; P < 0.05) in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to ovarian steroids for 4 months. Repetition of the pilot experiment with 12 ewes during the transition into anoestrus resulted in one ewe with LH pulses seasonally suppressed but increased by transport; 11 ewes had a distinct pulsatile LH pattern which was decreased by transport in six ewes. In anoestrus, there was no effect of transport on LH pulse frequency or amplitude in intact ewes, or those ovariectomized 2-3 weeks previously, with or without prior oestradiol and progesterone treatment. However, basal concentrations of cortisol were greater in anoestrus than in the breeding season, and the increment in cortisol during transport was similar in anoestrus and the breeding season but greater during the transition into anoestrus (P < 0.05). Progesterone concentrations increased from 0.31 +/- 0.02 ng ml-1 before transport to 0.48 +/- 0.05 ng ml-1 during the second hour of transport (P < 0.05). In conclusion, transport reduced LH pulse frequency and amplitude in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to exogenous steroids for at least 4 months. In most animals, the previously observed increase in LH pulsatility induced by exogenous CRH was not reproduced by increasing endogenous CRH secretion by transport. However, in four ewes, transport did increase LH pulsatility, but only during the transition into anoestrus in ewes with seasonally suppressed LH profiles after withdrawal of steroid pretreatment.     

Changes in pulsatile LH secretion and the positive and negative feedback actions of oestradiol after administration of a GnRH agonist in the ovariectomized ewe

Administration of a GnRH agonist (5 micrograms) every 12 h to long-term ovariectomized ewes for 5 or 10 days during the breeding season suppressed mean LH levels from around 6 to 1 ng/ml on Days 1 and 4 after treatment; on Day 1 after treatment LH pulse frequency and amplitude were lower than pretreatment values. On Day 4 after treatment LH pulse frequency was restored to pretreatment levels (1 per h) whereas LH pulse amplitude had only slightly increased from 0.5 to 1 ng/ml, a value 25% of that before treatment. This increase in amplitude was greater the shorter the duration of treatment. Ovariectomized ewes treated with the agonist for 5 days exhibited both negative and positive feedback actions after implantation of a capsule containing oestradiol; however, compared to control ewes treated with oestradiol only, the positive and negative feedback actions of oestradiol were blunted. These results suggest that the recovery of tonic LH concentrations after GnRH agonist-induced suppression is limited primarily by changes in LH pulse amplitude. The results also demonstrate that the feedback actions of oestradiol are attenuated, but not blocked, by GnRH agonist treatment.