Localization of urokinase type plasminogen activator to focal adhesions requires ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors

Previous studies have shown that the adhesion protein, vitronectin, directs the localization of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to areas of cell-substrate adhesion, where uPA is thought to regulate cell migration as well as pericellular proteolysis. In the present study, HT-1080 cell lines expressing either wild-type vitronectin or vitronectin containing a single amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain were used to assess whether ligation of the alphavbeta5 integrin was required for uPA localization to focal adhesions. The synthesis of wild-type vitronectin by HT-1080 cells adherent to either collagen or fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of both the alphavbeta5 integrin as well as uPA to focal adhesion structures. In contrast, cells synthesizing mutant vitronectin, containing the amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain, were unable to direct the redistribution of either alphavbeta5 or uPA to focal adhesions. Recombinant forms of wild-type and mutant vitronectin were prepared in a baculovirus system and compared for their ability to direct the redistribution of vitronectin integrin receptors as well as uPA on human skin fibroblasts. In the absence of vitronectin, fibroblast cells adherent to fibronectin assemble focal adhesions which contain the beta1 integrin but do not contain uPA. Addition of recombinant wild-type, but not mutant, vitronectin to fibroblasts adherent to fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5, and uPA into focal adhesions. However, when cells were plated directly onto antibodies directed against either the alphavbeta3 or alphavbeta5 integrins, uPA was not localized on the cell surface. These data indicate that ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors is necessary but not sufficient for the localization of uPA to areas of cell matrix adhesion, and suggest that vitronectin may promote cell migration by recruiting vitronectin integrin receptors and components of the plasminogen activator system to areas of cell matrix contact.     

Localization of Urokinase Type Plasminogen Activator to Focal Adhesions Requires Ligation of Vitronectin Integrin Receptors

Previous studies have shown that the adhesion protein, vitronectin, directs the localization of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to areas of cell-substrate adhesion, where uPA is thought to regulate cell migration as well as pericellular proteolysis. In the present study, HT-1080 cell lines expressing either wild-type vitronectin or vitronectin containing a single amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain were used to assess whether ligation of the α_vβT₅ integrin was required for uPA localization to focal adhesions. The synthesis of wild-type vitronectin by HT-1080 cells adherent to either collagen or fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of both the α_vβT₅ integrin as well as uPA to focal adhesion structures. In contrast, cells synthesizing mutant vitronectin, containing the amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain, were unable to direct the redistribution of either α_vβT₅ or uPA to focal adhesions. Recombinant forms of wild-type and mutant vitronectin were prepared in a baculovirus system and compared for their ability to direct the redistribution of vitronectin integrin receptors as well as uPA on human skin fibroblasts. In the absence of vitronectin, fibroblast cells adherent to fibronectin assemble focal adhesions which contain the βT₁ integrin but do not contain uPA. Addition of recombinant wild-type, but not mutant, vitronectin to fibroblasts adherent to fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of α_vβT₃, α_vβT₅, and uPA into focal adhesions. However, when cells were plated directly onto antibodies directed against either the α_vβT₃ or α_vβT₅ integrins, uPA was not localized on the cell surface. These data indicate that ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors is necessary but not sufficient for the localization of uPA to areas of cell-matrix adhesion, and suggest that vitronectin may promote cell migration by recruiting vitronectin integrin receptors and components of the plasminogen activator system to areas of cell matrix contact.     

The effects of vitronectin on specific interactions between urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its receptor: ab initio molecular orbital calculations

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its receptor (uPAR) on the surface of a cancer cell is considered to be a trigger for starting cancer invasions. In addition, the somatomedin B (SMB) domain of vitronectin binds simultaneously to uPAR to construct a ternary complex of uPAR–uPA–SMB. Here we present stable structures of the solvated complexes of uPAR–uPA and uPAR–uPA–SMB obtained by classical molecular mechanics simulations, and the specific interactions between uPAR, uPA and SMB are investigated by ab initio fragment molecular orbital calculations. The result indicates that the SMB binding enhances the binding affinity between uPAR and uPA, although there is no direct contact between SMB and uPA. In particular, the specific interaction between uPAR and the Lys36 residue of uPA is significantly affected by the SMB binding. The positively charged Lys23, Lys46 and Lys61 residues of uPA have strong attractive interactions to uPAR in both the uPAR–uPA and uPAR–uPA–SMB complexes, demonstrating the importance of these residues in the specific binding between uPAR and uPA. The current results on the specific interactions are informative for proposing potent antagonists, which block the uPA and SMB bindings to uPAR.     

Mapping of the vitronectin-binding site on the urokinase receptor: involvement of a coherent receptor interface consisting of residues from both domain I and the flanking interdomain linker region

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has been implicated as a modulator of several biochemical processes that are active during tumor invasion and metastasis, e.g. extracellular proteolysis, cell adhesion, and cell motility. The structural basis for the high affinity interaction between the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and uPAR, which focuses cell surface-associated plasminogen activation in vivo, is now thoroughly characterized by site-directed mutagenesis studies and x-ray crystallography. In contrast, the structural basis for the interaction between uPAR and the extracellular matrix protein vitronectin, which is involved in the regulation of cell adhesion and motility, remains to be clarified. In this study, we have identified the functional epitope on uPAR that is responsible for its interaction with the full-length, extended form of vitronectin by using a comprehensive alanine-scanning library of purified single-site uPAR mutants (244 positions tested). Interestingly, the five residues identified as "hot spots" for vitronectin binding form a contiguous epitope consisting of two exposed loops connecting the central fourstranded beta-sheet in uPAR domain I (Trp(32), Arg(58), and Ile(63)) as well as a proximal region of the flexible linker peptide connecting uPAR domains I and II (Arg(91) and Tyr(92)). This binding topology provides the molecular basis for the observation that uPAR can form a ternary complex with uPA and vitronectin. Furthermore, it raises the intriguing possibility that the canonical receptor and inhibitor for uPA (uPAR and PAI-1) may have reached a convergent solution for binding to the somatomedin B domain of vitronectin.     

Mannose 6-Phosphate/Insulin-like Growth Factor 2 Receptor Limits Cell Invasion by Controlling αVβ3 Integrin Expression and Proteolytic Processing of Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor

The multifunctional mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (M6P/IGF2R) is considered a tumor suppressor. We report here that RNA interference with M6P/IGF2R expression in urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) expressing human cancer and endothelial cells resulted in increased pericellular plasminogen activation, cell adhesion, and higher invasive potential through matrigel. M6P/IGF2R silencing led also to the cell surface accumulation of urokinase and plasminogen and enhanced expression of αV integrins. Genetic rescue experiments and inhibitor studies revealed that the enhanced plasminogen activation was due to a direct effect of M6P/IGF2R on uPAR, whereas increased cell adhesion to vitronectin was dependent on αV integrin expression and not uPAR. Increased cell invasion of M6P/IGF2R knockdown cells was rescued by cosilencing both uPAR and αV integrin. Furthermore, we found that M6P/IGF2R expression accelerates the cleavage of uPAR. M6P/IGF2R silencing resulted in an increased ratio of full-length uPAR to the truncated D2D3 fragment, incapable of binding most uPAR ligands. We conclude that M6P/IGF2R controls cell invasion by regulating αV integrin expression and by accelerating uPAR cleavage, leading to the loss of the urokinase/vitronectin/integrin-binding site on uPAR.     

Effect of hypoxia on cellular adhesion to vitronectin and fibronectin

Cellular invasion of extracellular matrix (ECM) occurs during normal and pathological settings. For cells to invade, they must adhere to the underlying substratum, break down barrier molecules, and detach from the substratum prior to migrating through the ECM. We previously demonstrated that incubation under reduced oxygen levels increases the in vitro invasiveness of trophoblast and breast carcinoma cells, an effect linked to elevated expression of the cell surface receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR). This study examined the role of oxygen, integrins and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system on the adhesion of trophoblast and breast carcinoma cells to the ECM molecules vitronectin and fibronectin. Compared to exposure to 20 and 5% oxygen, exposure to 1% oxygen decreased adhesion of these cells to vitronectin and fibronectin, an effect that was reversible by re-exposure to 20% oxygen. Incubation in 1% oxygen also resulted in reduced expression of surface alpha(5) integrin. Furthermore, adhesion to vitronectin and fibronectin was reduced by compounds that interfere with integrin function, such as EDTA, anti-integrin antibodies, or by antibodies that interfere with the binding of pro-uPA to uPAR, soluble uPAR, soluble vitronectin, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, as well as plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. These findings suggest an important role for oxygen in the regulation of cellular invasion, possibly in part through its effects on integrin and uPAR-mediated mechanisms of adhesion.     

Conformational regulation of urokinase receptor function: impact of receptor occupancy and epitope-mapped monoclonal antibodies on lamellipodia induction

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a glycolipid-anchored membrane protein with an established role in focalizing uPA-mediated plasminogen activation on cell surfaces. Distinct from this function, uPAR also modulates cell adhesion and migration on vitronectin-rich matrices. Although uPA and vitronectin engage structurally distinct binding sites on uPAR, they nonetheless cooperate functionally, as uPA binding potentiates uPAR-dependent induction of lamellipodia on vitronectin matrices. We now present data advancing the possibility that it is the burial of the β-hairpin in uPA per se into the hydrophobic ligand binding cavity of uPAR that modulates the function of this receptor. Based on these data, we now propose a model in which the inherent interdomain mobility in uPAR plays a major role in modulating its function. Particularly one uPAR conformation, which is stabilized by engagement of the β-hairpin in uPA, favors the proper assembly of an active, compact receptor structure that stimulates lamellipodia induction on vitronectin. This molecular model has wide implications for drug development targeting uPAR function.     

Sequences within domain II of the urokinase receptor critical for differential ligand recognition

The receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) plays important roles in a number of physiological and pathological processes by virtue of its interactions with urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), vitronectin (Vn), and several other proteins. The uPA binding site spans all three domains (D1 to D3) of uPAR. However, the nature of the Vn binding site within uPAR is still not clear. In this study, we conducted homolog-scanning mutagenesis on uPAR by switching 14 individual segments of 4-8 residues to their counterpart sequences of a uPAR homolog CD59. All 14 mutants were well expressed, reacted with a panel of monoclonal antibodies, and exhibited correct molecular weights. Of these 14 mutants, six mutants were defective in both uPA and Vn binding. Most importantly, we found two unique mutants uPAR(Asn172-Lys175) and uPAR(Glu183-Asn186) within the D2 domain, which displayed differential ligand binding activity: both had high affinity uPA binding, but completely lost Vn binding, indicating that these two sequences constitute a novel Vn binding site. Indeed, two peptides, P1 (153CPGSNGFHNNDTFHFLKC) and P2 (171CNTTKCNEGPILELENLPQ), derived from the sequences of the identified uPA and Vn binding pockets within D2, respectively, behaved like bona fide ligand binding sites: peptide P1 bound uPA but not Vn, whereas peptide P2 bound Vn and inhibited uPAR-mediated cell adhesion, but did not interact with uPA. Altogether, our data demonstrated that uPAR D2 contains two distinct ligand binding sites for uPA and Vn. Such information will help us better understand the complex roles of uPAR in cell adhesion, migration, and tumor metastasis.     

Ligand binding regions in the receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator

The interaction between urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its cellular receptor (uPAR) is a key event in cell surface-associated plasminogen activation, relevant for cell migration and invasion. In order to define receptor recognition sites for uPA, we have expressed uPAR fragments as fusion products with the minor coat protein on the surface of M13 bacteriophages. Sequence analysis of cDNA fragments encoding uPA-binding peptides indicated the existence of a composite uPA-binding structure including all three uPAR domains. This finding was confirmed by experiments using an overlapping 15-mer peptide array covering the entire uPAR molecule. Four regions within the uPAR sequence were found to directly bind to uPA: two distinct regions containing amino acids 13--20 and amino acids 74--84 of the uPAR domain I, and regions in the putative loop 3 of the domains II and III. All the uPA-binding fragments from the three domains were shown to have an agonistic effect on uPA binding to immobilized uPAR. Furthermore, uPAR-(154--176) increased uPAR-transfected BAF3-cell adhesion on vitronectin in the presence of uPA, whereas uPAR-(247--276) stimulated the cell adhesion both in the absence or presence of uPA. The latter fragment was also able to augment the binding of vitronectin to uPAR in a purified system, thereby mimicking the effect of uPA on this interaction. These results indicate that uPA binding can take place to particular part(s) on several uPAR molecules and that direct uPAR-uPAR contacts may contribute to receptor activation and ligand binding.     

Regulation of urokinase receptor proteolytic function by the tetraspanin CD82

The high affinity interaction between the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its glycolipid-anchored cellular receptor (uPAR) promotes plasminogen activation and the efficient generation of pericellular proteolytic activity. We demonstrate here that expression of the tetraspanin CD82/KAI1 (a tumor metastasis suppressor) leads to a profound effect on uPAR function. Pericellular plasminogen activation was reduced by approximately 50-fold in the presence of CD82, although levels of components of the plasminogen activation system were unchanged. uPAR was present on the cell surface and molecularly intact, but radioligand binding analysis with uPA and anti-uPAR antibodies revealed that it was in a previously undetected cryptic form unable to bind uPA. This was not due to direct interactions between uPAR and CD82, as they neither co-localized on the cell surface nor could be co-immunoprecipitated. However, expression of CD82 led to a redistribution of uPAR to focal adhesions, where it was shown by double immunofluorescence labeling to co-localize with the integrin alpha(5)beta(1), which was also redistributed in the presence of CD82. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that, in the presence of CD82, uPAR preferentially formed stable associations with alpha(5)beta(1), but not with a variety of other integrins, including alpha(3)beta(1). These data suggest that CD82 inhibits the proteolytic function of uPAR indirectly, directing uPAR and alpha(5)beta(1) to focal adhesions and promoting their association with a resultant loss of uPA binding. This represents a novel mechanism whereby tetraspanins, integrins, and uPAR, systems involved in cell adhesion and migration, cooperate to regulate pericellular proteolytic activity and may suggest a mechanism for the tumor-suppressive effects of CD82/KAI1.     

Is plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 the molecular switch that governs urokinase receptor-mediated cell adhesion and release?

Induction of the urokinase type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) promotes cell adhesion through its interaction with vitronectin (VN) in the extracellular matrix, and facilitates cell migration and invasion by localizing uPA to the cell surface. We provide evidence that this balance between cell adhesion and cell detachment is governed by PA inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). First, we demonstrate that uPAR and PAI-1 bind to the same site in VN (i.e., the amino-terminal somatomedin B domain; SMB), and that PAI-1 competes with uPAR for binding to SMB. Domain swapping and mutagenesis studies indicate that the uPAR-binding sequence is located within the central region of the SMB domain, a region previously shown to contain the PAI-1-binding motif. Second, we show that PAI-1 dissociates bound VN from uPAR and detaches U937 cells from their VN substratum. This PAI-1 mediated release of cells from VN appears to occur independently of its ability to function as a protease inhibitor, and may help to explain why high PAI-1 levels indicate a poor prognosis for many cancers. Finally, we show that uPA can rapidly reverse this effect of PAI-1. Taken together, these results suggest a dynamic regulatory role for PAI-1 and uPA in uPAR-mediated cell adhesion and release.     

Urokinase regulates vitronectin binding by controlling urokinase receptor oligomerization

Adhesion of monocytes to the extracellular matrix is mediated by a direct high affinity interaction between cell-surface urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) receptor (uPAR) and the extracellular matrix protein vitronectin. We demonstrate a tight connection between uPA-regulated uPAR oligomerization and high affinity binding to immobilized vitronectin. We find that binding of soluble uPAR (suPAR) to immobilized vitronectin is strictly ligand-dependent with a linear relationship between the observed binding and the concentration of ligand added. Nevertheless, a comparison of experimentally obtained binding curves to those generated using a simple equilibrium model suggests that the high affinity vitronectin-binding pro-uPA.suPAR complex contains two molecules of suPAR. In co-immunoprecipitation experiments, using different epitope-tagged suPAR molecules, suPAR/suPAR co-immunoprecipitation displayed a similar uPA dose dependence as that observed for vitronectin binding, demonstrating that the high affinity vitronectin-binding complex indeed contains oligomeric suPAR. Structurally, the kringle domain of uPA was found to be critical for the formation of the vitronectin-binding competent complex because the amino-terminal fragment, but not the growth factor-like domain, behaved as a full-length uPA. Our data represent the first demonstration of functional, ligand-induced uPAR oligomerization having extensive implications for glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored receptors in general, and for the biology of the uPA/uPAR system in particular.     

Urinary-type plasminogen activator (uPA) expression and uPA receptor localization are regulated by alpha 3beta 1 integrin in oral keratinocytes

Expression of urinary-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) is correlated with matrix proteolysis, cell adhesion, motility, and invasion. To evaluate the functional link between adhesion and proteolysis in gingival keratinocytes (pp126), cells were treated with immobilized integrin antibodies to induce integrin clustering. Clustering of alpha(3) and beta(1) integrin subunits, but not alpha(2), alpha(5), alpha(6), or beta(4), enhanced uPA secretion. Bead-immobilized laminin-5 and collagen I, two major alpha(3)beta(1) ligands, also induced uPA expression. Coordinate regulation of the serpin plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 was also apparent; however, a net increase in uPA activity was predominant. alpha(3)beta(1) integrin clustering induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation, and both uPA induction and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation were blocked by the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase inhibitor PD98059. Integrin aggregation also promoted a dramatic redistribution of uPAR on the cell surface to sites of clustered alpha(3)beta(1) integrins. Co-immunoprecipitation of beta(1) integrin with uPAR provided further evidence that protein-protein interactions between uPAR and beta(1) integrin control uPAR distribution. As a functional consequence of uPA up-regulation and uPA-mediated plasminogen activation, the globular domain of the laminin-5 alpha(3) subunit, a major pp126 matrix protein, was proteolytically processed from a 190-kDa form to a 160-kDa species. Laminin-5 containing the 160-kDa alpha(3) subunit efficiently nucleates hemidesmosome formation and reduces cell motility. Together, these data suggest that multivalent aggregation of the alpha(3)beta(1) integrin regulates proteinase expression, matrix proteolysis, and subsequent cellular behavior.     

High-molecular-weight serum protein complexes differentially promote cell migration and the focal adhesion localization of the urokinase receptor in human glioma cells

The distribution of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) on human glioma cells was examined as a function of culture conditions, using immunofluorescence and immunophotoelectron microscopy. Both uPAR colocalization with focal adhesion proteins and glioma cell motility were maximal in medium containing whole serum or a serum fraction retained by a 500,000 mol wt cutoff centrifugal concentration filter. High motility also took place in medium containing a serum fraction passed by the 500,000 cutoff filter but retained by a 100,000 cutoff filter and in minimal medium containing added vitronectin; however, under these conditions only a small percentage of the otherwise abundant focal adhesions contained colocalized uPAR. Glioma cells in minimal medium with added laminin migrated with a highly elongated morphology but without either classical focal adhesions or well-defined uPAR labeling. In contrast, glioma cells in minimal medium with no additions did not migrate, nor did they adhere well or display defined labeling patterns for focal adhesion proteins or uPAR. The results indicate that high-molecular-weight serum protein complexes promote both uPAR-focal adhesion colocalization and cell migration in glioma cells. However, conditions can be selected in which migration takes place with minimal uPAR-focal adhesion localization, as well as in the absence of apparent focal adhesions.     

Crystal structure of the human urokinase plasminogen activator receptor bound to an antagonist peptide

We report the crystal structure of a soluble form of human urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR/CD87), which is expressed at the invasive areas of the tumor-stromal microenvironment in many human cancers. The structure was solved at 2.7 A in association with a competitive peptide inhibitor of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)-uPAR interaction. uPAR is composed of three consecutive three-finger domains organized in an almost circular manner, which generates both a deep internal cavity where the peptide binds in a helical conformation, and a large external surface. This knowledge combined with the discovery of a convergent binding motif shared by the antagonist peptide and uPA allowed us to build a model of the human uPA-uPAR complex. This model reveals that the receptor-binding module of uPA engages the uPAR central cavity, thus leaving the external receptor surface accessible for other protein interactions (vitronectin and integrins). By this unique structural assembly, uPAR can orchestrate the fine interplay with the partners that are required to guide uPA-focalized proteolysis on the cell surface and control cell adhesion and migration.     

Solution structure of recombinant somatomedin B domain from vitronectin produced in Pichia pastoris

The cysteine-rich somatomedin B domain (SMB) of the matrix protein vitronectin is involved in several important biological processes. First, it stabilizes the active conformation of the plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1); second, it provides the recognition motif for cell adhesion via the cognate integrins (alpha(v)beta(3), alpha(v)beta(5), and alpha(IIb)beta(3)); and third, it binds the complex between urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its glycolipid-anchored receptor (uPAR). Previous structural studies on SMB have used recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli or SMB released from plasma-derived vitronectin by CNBr cleavage. However, different disulfide patterns and three-dimensional structures for SMB were reported. In the present study, we have expressed recombinant human SMB by two different eukaryotic expression systems, Pichia pastoris and Drosophila melanogaster S2-cells, both yielding structurally and functionally homogeneous protein preparations. Importantly, the entire population of our purified, recombinant SMB has a solvent exposure, both as a free domain and in complex with PAI-1, which is indistinguishable from that of plasma-derived SMB as assessed by amide hydrogen ((1)H/(2)H) exchange. This solvent exposure was only reproduced by one of three synthetic SMB products with predefined disulfide connectivities corresponding to those published previously. Furthermore, this connectivity was also the only one to yield a folded and functional domain. The NMR structure was determined for free SMB produced by Pichia and is largely consistent with that solved by X-ray crystallography for SMB in complex with PAI-1.     

Urokinase induces expression of its own receptor in Beas2B lung epithelial cells

Interaction between the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) localizes cellular proteolysis and promotes cellular proliferation and migration. The interaction between uPA and uPAR at the surface of epithelial cells thereby contributes to the pathogenesis of lung inflammation and neoplasia. In this study, we sought to determine if uPA itself alters uPAR expression by lung epithelial cells. uPA enhanced uPAR expression as well as (125)I-uPA binding in Beas2B lung epithelial cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. The uPA-mediated induction of uPAR is not accomplished through its receptor and requires enzymatic activity. The low molecular weight fragment of uPA, lacking the receptor binding domain, was as potent as intact two-chain uPA in inducing expression of uPAR at the cell surface. Plasmin, the end product of plasminogen activation, did not alter uPA-mediated uPAR expression. Induction of uPAR by uPA represents a novel pathway by which epithelial cells can regulate uPAR-dependent cellular responses that may contribute to stromal remodeling in lung injury or neoplasia.     

Urokinase links plasminogen activation and cell adhesion by cleavage of the RGD motif in vitronectin

Components of the plasminogen activation system including urokinase (uPA), its inhibitor (PAI‐1) and its cell surface receptor (uPAR) have been implicated in a wide variety of biological processes related to tissue homoeostasis. Firstly, the binding of uPA to uPAR favours extracellular proteolysis by enhancing cell surface plasminogen activation. Secondly, it promotes cell adhesion and signalling through binding of the provisional matrix protein vitronectin. We now report that uPA and plasmin induces a potent negative feedback on cell adhesion through specific cleavage of the RGD motif in vitronectin. Cleavage of vitronectin by uPA displays a remarkable receptor dependence and requires concomitant binding of both uPA and vitronectin to uPAR. Moreover, we show that PAI‐1 counteracts the negative feedback and behaves as a proteolysis‐triggered stabilizer of uPAR‐mediated cell adhesion to vitronectin. These findings identify a novel and highly specific function for the plasminogen activation system in the regulation of cell adhesion to vitronectin. The cleavage of vitronectin by uPA and plasmin results in the release of N‐terminal vitronectin fragments that can be detected in vivo, underscoring the potential physiological relevance of the process.     

Mimicry of the regulatory role of urokinase in lamellipodia formation by introduction of a non-native interdomain disulfide bond in its receptor

The high-affinity interaction between the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its glycolipid-anchored receptor (uPAR) plays a regulatory role for both extravascular fibrinolysis and uPAR-mediated adhesion and migration on vitronectin-coated surfaces. We have recently proposed that the adhesive function of uPAR is allosterically regulated via a "tightening" of its three-domain structure elicited by uPA binding. To challenge this proposition, we redesigned the uPAR structure to limit its inherent conformational flexibility by covalently tethering domains DI and DIII via a non-natural interdomain disulfide bond (uPAR(H47C-N259C)). The corresponding soluble receptor has 1) a smaller hydrodynamic volume, 2) a higher content of secondary structure, and 3) unaltered binding kinetics towards uPA. Most importantly, the purified uPAR(H47C-N259C) also displays a gain in affinity for the somatomedin B domain of vitronectin compared with uPAR(wt), thus recapitulating the improved affinity that accompanies uPA-uPAR(wt) complex formation. This functional mimicry is, intriguingly, operational also in a cellular setting, where it controls lamellipodia formation in uPAR-transfected HEK293 cells adhering to vitronectin. In this respect, the engineered constraint in uPAR(H47C-N259C) thus bypasses the regulatory role of uPA binding, resulting in a constitutively active uPAR. In conclusion, our data argue for a biological relevance of the interdomain dynamics of the glycolipid-anchored uPAR on the cell surface.     

Critical role of integrin alpha 5 beta 1 in urokinase (uPA)/urokinase receptor (uPAR,CD87) signaling

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) induces cell adhesion and chemotactic movement. uPA signaling requires its binding to uPA receptor (uPAR/CD87), but how glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR mediates signaling is unclear. uPAR is a ligand for several integrins (e.g. alpha 5 beta 1) and supports cell-cell interaction by binding to integrins on apposing cells (in trans). We studied whether binding of uPAR to alpha 5 beta 1 in cis is involved in adhesion and migration of Chinese hamster ovary cells in response to immobilized uPA. This process was temperature-sensitive and required mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Anti-uPAR antibody or depletion of uPAR blocked, whereas overexpression of uPAR enhanced, cell adhesion to uPA. Adhesion to uPA was also blocked by deletion of the growth factor domain (GFD) of uPA and by anti-GFD antibody, whereas neither the isolated uPA kringle nor serine protease domain supported adhesion directly. Interestingly, anti-alpha 5 antibody, RGD peptide, and function-blocking mutations in alpha 5 beta 1 blocked adhesion to uPA. uPA-induced cell migration also required GFD, uPAR, and alpha 5 beta 1, but alpha 5 beta 1 alone did not support uPA-induced adhesion and migration. Thus, binding of uPA causes uPAR to act as a ligand for alpha 5 beta 1 to induce cell adhesion, intracellular signaling, and cell migration. We demonstrated that uPA induced RGD-dependent binding of uPAR to alpha 5 beta 1 in solution. These results suggest that uPA-induced adhesion and migration of Chinese hamster ovary cells occurs as a consequence of (a) uPA binding to uPAR through GFD, (b) the subsequent binding of a uPA.uPAR complex to alpha 5 beta 1 via uPAR, and (c) signal transduction through alpha 5 beta 1.