The Cell Tropism of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Determines the Kinetics of Plasma Viremia in SCID Mice Reconstituted with Human Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Most individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) initially harbor macrophage-tropic, non-syncytium-inducing (M-tropic, NSI) viruses that may evolve into T-cell-tropic, syncytium-inducing viruses (T-tropic, SI) after several years. The reasons for the more efficient transmission of M-tropic, NSI viruses and the slow evolution of T-tropic, SI viruses remain unclear, although they may be linked to expression of appropriate chemokine coreceptors for virus entry. We have examined plasma viral RNA levels and the extent of CD4⁺ T-cell depletion in SCID mice reconstituted with human peripheral blood leukocytes following infection with M-tropic, dual-tropic, or T-tropic HIV-1 isolates. The cell tropism was found to determine the course of viremia, with M-tropic viruses producing sustained high viral RNA levels and sparing some CD4⁺ T cells, dual-tropic viruses producing a transient and lower viral RNA spike and extremely rapid depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, and T-tropic viruses causing similarly lower viral RNA levels and rapid-intermediate rates of CD4⁺ T-cell depletion. A single amino acid change in the V3 region of gp120 was sufficient to cause one isolate to switch from M-tropic to dual-tropic and acquire the ability to rapidly deplete all CD4⁺ T cells.The envelope gene of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) determines the cell tropism of the virus (11, 32, 47, 62), the use of chemokine receptors as cofactors for viral entry (4, 17), and the ability of the virus to induce syncytia in infected cells (55, 60). Cell tropism is closely linked to but probably not exclusively determined by the ability of different HIV-1 envelopes to bind CD4 and the CC or the CXC chemokine receptors and initiate viral fusion with the target cell. Macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) viruses infect primary cultures of macrophages and CD4⁺ T cells and use CCR5 as the preferred coreceptor (2, 5, 15, 23, 26, 31). T-cell-tropic (T-tropic) viruses can infect primary cultures of CD4⁺ T cells and established T-cell lines, but not primary macrophages. T-tropic viruses use CXCR4 as a coreceptor for viral entry (27). Dual-tropic viruses have both of these properties and can use either CCR5 or CXCR4 (and infrequently other chemokine receptors [25]) for viral entry (24, 37, 57). M-tropic viruses are most frequently transmitted during primary infection of humans and persist throughout the duration of the infection (63). Many, but not all, infected individuals show an evolution of virus cell tropism from M-tropic to dual-tropic and finally to T-tropic with increasing time after infection (21, 38, 57). Increases in replicative capacity of viruses from patients with long-term infection have also been noted (22), and the switch to the syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype in T-tropic or dual-tropic isolates is associated with more rapid disease progression (10, 20, 60). Primary infection with dual-tropic or T-tropic HIV, although infrequent, often leads to rapid disease progression (16, 51). The viral and host factors that determine the higher transmission rate of M-tropic HIV-1 and the slow evolution of dual- or T-tropic variants remain to be elucidated (4).These observations suggest that infection with T-tropic, SI virus isolates in animal model systems with SCID mice grafted with human lymphoid cells or tissue should lead to a rapid course of disease (1, 8, 44–46). While some studies in SCID mice grafted with fetal thymus and liver are in agreement with this concept (33, 34), our previous studies with the human peripheral blood leukocyte-SCID (hu-PBL-SCID) mouse model have shown that infection with M-tropic isolates (e.g., SF162) causes more rapid CD4⁺ T-cell depletion than infection with T-tropic, SI isolates (e.g., SF33), despite similar proviral copy numbers, and that this property mapped to envelope (28, 41, 43). However, the dual-tropic 89.6 isolate (19) caused extremely rapid CD4⁺ T-cell depletion in infected hu-PBL-SCID mice that was associated with an early and transient increase in HIV-1 plasma viral RNA (29). The relationship between cell tropism of the virus isolate and the pattern of disease in hu-PBL-SCID mice is thus uncertain. We have extended these studies by determining the kinetics of HIV-1 RNA levels in serial plasma samples of hu-PBL-SCID mice infected with primary patient isolates or laboratory stocks that differ in cell tropism and SI properties. The results showed significant differences in the kinetics of HIV-1 replication and CD4⁺ T-cell depletion that are determined by the cell tropism of the virus isolate.     

Neutralization Sensitivity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolates to Antibodies and CD4-Based Reagents Is Independent of Coreceptor Usage

We have investigated whether the identity of the coreceptor (CCR5, CXCR4, or both) used by primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates to enter CD4⁺ cells influences the sensitivity of these isolates to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies and CD4-based agents. Coreceptor usage was not an important determinant of neutralization titer for primary isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We also studied whether dualtropic primary isolates (able to use both CCR5 and CXCR4) were differentially sensitive to neutralization by the same antibodies when entering U87MG-CD4 cells stably expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4. Again, we found that the coreceptor used by a virus did not greatly affect its neutralization sensitivity. Similar results were obtained for CCR5- or CXCR4-expressing HOS cell lines engineered to express green fluorescent protein as a reporter of HIV-1 entry. Neutralizing antibodies are therefore unlikely to be the major selection pressure which drives the phenotypic evolution (change in coreceptor usage) of HIV-1 that can occur in vivo. In addition, the increase in neutralization sensitivity found when primary isolates adapt to growth in transformed cell lines in vitro has little to do with alterations in coreceptor usage.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) enters CD4⁺ T cells via an interaction with CD4 and coreceptor molecules, the most important of which yet identified are the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR5 (4, 12, 23, 26, 28, 32). CXCR4 is used by T-cell line-tropic (T-tropic) primary isolates or T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) lab strains, whereas CCR5 is used by primary isolates of the macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) phenotype (4, 12, 23, 26, 28, 32). Most T-tropic isolates and some TCLA strains are actually dualtropic in that they can use both CXCR4 and CCR5 (and often other coreceptors such as CCR3, Bonzo/STRL33, and BOB/gpr15), at least in coreceptor-transfected cells (18, 24, 30, 54, 89). The M-tropic and T-tropic/dualtropic nomenclature has often been used interchangeably with the terms “non-syncytium-inducing” (NSI) and “syncytium-inducing” (SI), although it is semantically imprecise to do so.M-tropic viruses are those most commonly transmitted sexually (3, 33, 87, 106) and from mother to infant (2, 72, 81). If T-tropic strains are transmitted, or when they emerge, this is associated with a more rapid course of disease in both adults (17, 37, 46, 51, 52, 76, 78, 82, 92, 101) and children (6, 45, 84, 90). However, T-tropic viruses emerge in only about 40% of infected people, usually only several years after infection (76, 78). A well-documented, albeit anecdotal, study found that when a T-tropic strain was transmitted by direct transfer of blood, its replication was rapidly suppressed: the T-tropic virus was eliminated from the body, and M-tropic strains predominated (20). These results suggest that there is a counterselection pressure against the emergence of T-tropic strains during the early stages of HIV-1 infection in most people. But what is this pressure?Since the M-tropic and T-tropic phenotypes are properties mediated by the envelope glycoproteins whose function is to associate with CD4 and the coreceptors, a selection pressure differentially exerted on M- and T-tropic viruses could, in principle, act at the level of virus entry. In other words, neutralizing antibodies to the envelope glycoproteins, or the chemokine ligands of the coreceptors, could theoretically interfere more potently with the interactions of T-tropic strains with CXCR4 than with M-tropic viruses and CCR5. A differential effect of this nature could suppress the emergence of T-tropic viruses. Consistent with this possibility, neutralizing antibodies are capable of preventing the CD4-dependent association of gp120 with CCR5 (42, 94, 103), and chemokines can also prevent the coreceptor interactions of HIV-1 (8, 13, 23, 28, 70).Here, we explore whether the efficiency of HIV-1 neutralization is affected by coreceptor usage. Although earlier studies have not found T-tropic strains to be inherently more neutralization sensitive than M-tropic ones (20, 40, 44), previously available reagents and techniques may not have been adequate to fully address this question. One major problem is that even single residue changes can drastically affect both antibody binding to neutralization epitopes and the HIV-1 phenotype (25, 55, 62, 67, 83, 91), and so studies using relatively unrelated viruses and a fixed antibody (polyclonal or monoclonal) preparation have two variables to contend with: the viral phenotype (coreceptor use) and the antigenic structure of the virus and hence the efficiency of the antibody-virion interaction.We have used a new experimental strategy to explore whether coreceptor usage affects neutralization sensitivity in the absence of other confounding variables: the use of dualtropic viruses able to enter CD4⁺ cells via either CCR5 or CXCR4. By using a constant HIV-1 isolate or clone and the same monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) or CD4-based reagents as neutralizing agents, we can ensure that the only variable under study in the neutralization reaction is the nature of the coreceptor used for entry. Our major conclusion is that there is no strong association between coreceptor usage and neutralization sensitivity for primary HIV-1 isolates. Independent studies have reached the same conclusion (53a, 59). The emergence of T-tropic (SI) viruses in vivo may be unlikely to be due to escape from antibody-mediated selection pressure.     

Endosomal Trafficking of HIV-1 Gag and Genomic RNAs Regulates Viral Egress

HIV-1 Gag can assemble and generate virions at the plasma membrane, but it is also present in endosomes where its role remains incompletely characterized. Here, we show that HIV-1 RNAs and Gag are transported on endosomal vesicles positive for TiVamp, a v-SNARE involved in fusion events with the plasma membrane. Inhibition of endosomal traffic did not prevent viral release. However, inhibiting lysosomal degradation induced an accumulation of Gag in endosomes and increased viral production 7-fold, indicating that transport of Gag to lysosomes negatively regulates budding. This also suggested that endosomal Gag-RNA complexes could access retrograde pathways to the cell surface and indeed, depleting cells of TiVamp-reduced viral production. Moreover, inhibition of endosomal transport prevented the accumulation of Gag at sites of cellular contact. HIV-1 Gag could thus generate virions using two pathways, either directly from the plasma membrane or through an endosome-dependent route. Endosomal Gag-RNA complexes may be delivered at specific sites to facilitate cell-to-cell viral transmission.The production of infectious retroviral particles is an ordered process that includes many steps (for review see Refs. 1–3). In particular, three major viral components, Gag, the envelope, and genomic RNAs have to traffic inside the cell to reach their assembly site. Viral biogenesis is driven by the polyprotein Gag, which is able to make viral-like particles when expressed alone (4). Upon release, HIV-1⁴ Gag is processed by the viral protease into matrix (MA(p17)), capsid (CA(p24)), nucleocapsid (NC(p7)), p6, and smaller peptides SP1 and SP2. Gag contains several domains that are essential for viral assembly: a membrane binding domain (M) in MA; a Gag-Gag interaction domain in CA; an assembly domain (I) in NC; and a late domain (L) in p6, which recruits the cellular budding machinery. Genomic RNAs are specifically recognized by NC, and they play fundamental roles in viral biogenesis by acting as a scaffold for Gag multimerization (5).It has been demonstrated that retroviruses bud by hijacking the endosomal machinery that sorts proteins into internal vesicles of multivesicular bodies (for review, see Refs. 6, 7). Indeed, these vesicles bud with the same topology as viral particles. Proteins sorted into this pathway are usually destined for degradation in lysosomes, but some can also recycle to the plasma membrane (for review see Refs. 8, 9). They are also frequently ubiquitinated on their cytoplasmic domain (10, 11), allowing their recognition by ESCRT complexes. ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I recognize ubiquitinated cargo present at the surface of endosomes and recruit other ESCRT complexes (12–14). ESCRT-III is believed to function directly in the formation of multivesicular body intralumenal vesicles (12), even though its mechanism of action is currently not understood. Remarkably, Gag L domains interact directly with components of the multivesicular body-sorting machinery (for review see Ref. 15). HIV-1 Gag uses a PTAP motif to bind Tsg101, a component of ESCRT-I (16–19), and a YPLTSL motif to interact with Alix, a protein linked to ESCRT-I and -III (20–22). Finally, various ubiquitin ligases are also required directly or indirectly during HIV-1 biogenesis (23, 24; for review see Ref. 25).In many cell lines, Gag is found both at the plasma membrane and in endosomes. This has led to the hypothesis that there are several assembly sites for HIV-1 (1, 3). First, Gag can initiate and complete assembly at the plasma membrane. This is thought to occur predominantly in T lymphocytes, and this process is supported by several lines of evidences: (i) disruption of endosomal trafficking with drugs does not prevent viral production (26, 27); (ii) ESCRT complexes can be recruited at the plasma membrane, at sites where Gag accumulates (28–30); (iii) Gag can be seen multimerizing and budding from the plasma membrane in live cells (31). Second, Gag could initiate assembly in endosomes, and then traffic to the cell surface to be released. This is mainly supported by the presence of Gag in endosomes in several cell lines (32–34), including T cells and more strikingly macrophages (32, 35, 36–39). However, we are currently lacking functional experiments addressing the role of this endosomal pool of Gag, and it is still not clear to what extent it contributes to the production of viral particles. Nevertheless, the presence of Gag in endosomes might facilitate recruitment of ESCRT complexes (34, 40), packaging of viral genomic RNAs (32, 41), and incorporation of the envelope (42). It may also be important for polarized budding (43, 44) and to create a viral reservoir in infected cells (45, 46).Despite great progress, the traffic of HIV-1 components is still not fully elucidated. In particular, the transport of the genomic RNAs is poorly understood. In this study, we have used single molecule techniques to investigate the trafficking of HIV-1 RNAs in fixed and live cells, and we show that they are transported on endosomal vesicles. We also obtained functional evidence that Gag and viral RNAs can use at least two trafficking pathways to produce virions, one going directly from the plasma membrane and another one passing through endosomes.     

Extent of Antigenic Diversity in the V3 Region of the Surface Glycoprotein,gp120, of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Group M and Consequences for Serotyping

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) may be studied by molecular or immunological approaches. Most analyses have been performed by genetic comparison of isolates and have led to the definition of clades or subtypes within the major (M) group of HIV-1. Five subtypes (A to E) were initially identified by comparison of genomic sequences. Four new subtypes (F to I) were identified more recently. Amino acid differences in the immunogenic V3 loop between isolates have also been studied, leading to a phenetic classification of at least 14 clusters (1 to 14) of sequences (B. T. M. Korber, K. McInnes, R. F. Smith, and G. Myers, J. Virol. 68:6730–6744, 1994). In this study, we compared the antigenicity of the V3 consensus sequences defined by phylogenetic analysis to the antigenicity of those defined by phenetic analysis. We used a recently developed subtype-specific enzyme immunoassay (SSEIA) that uses the principle of blocking with an excess of peptide in the liquid phase. Two SSEIAs were performed, the first with five V3 sequences defined by phylogenetic analysis and the second with 14 V3 sequences defined by phenetic analysis. A total of 168 HIV-1 sera taken from seropositive individuals from seven different countries or regions were studied. Experimental and statistical data, including correlation matrix and cluster analyses, demonstrated associations between the genetic subtypes and phenetically associated groups. Most of these were predicted by Korber et al. (J. Virol. 68:6730–6744, 1994) by theoretical analysis. We also found that V3 sequences can be grouped into between three and five antigenically unrelated categories. Residues that may be responsible for major antigenic differences were identified at the apex of the V3 loop, within the octapeptide xIGPGxxx, where x represents the critical positions. Our study provides evidence that there is a limited number of V3 serotypes which could be easily monitored by serological assays to study the diversity and dynamics of HIV-1 strains.The diversity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is a major problem in the development of an effective vaccine against AIDS. Many HIV-1 sequences are now available, and phylogenetic analysis resulting in a continuously developing classification into subtypes or clades is possible (45). HIV-1 isolates are classified into the M group (for major) or O group (for outlier). The O group contains only a few variants, all from a limited area of Africa (19, 27, 50). The M group includes variants responsible for the present AIDS pandemic. It contains at least five subtypes (A to E), to which have been added more recently four other subtypes (F to I) (23, 28, 34, 36, 37). Subtypes A, C, D, G, and H are common in Africa (21, 35, 37, 38). Subtype B is the most common in America and Europe (24, 26, 51). Subtype E occurs mainly in Asia (25, 30, 41), and subtype F has been detected in Brazil and Romania (3, 28, 34). These distributions are not restrictive. Subtype C is also present in Asia (India and China), and subtype G is also present in Russia (7, 12, 29). The African subtypes (A, C, and D) and the Asian subtype (E) have also been identified in North America and in European countries (9, 13, 14, 32, 48). All the subtypes are present in Africa, including B (detected in West Africa), E (Central African Republic), and F (Cameroon) (1, 35, 38). Analysis of the genetic diversity of HIV-1 is becoming more difficult due to the increasing frequency of coinfections and recombinations (15, 20, 44).Phylogenetic trees have been generated with gag, env, or tat nucleotide sequences. Shorter DNA sequences encoding the functionally important V3 region of the envelope protein are most frequently used to provide reliable subtype designations (37). The diversity of the immunogenic V3 loop has also been studied by comparing the amino acids of different isolates, leading to a phenetic classification of at least 14 clusters of sequences, each one characterized by a consensus sequence based on the most common amino acid in a given position (22).The heterogeneity of HIV-1 strains is studied mostly by molecular characterization of genomic sequences. This involves sequencing fragments amplified by the PCR or the use of the heteroduplex mobility assay (10, 11). However, although these methods allow direct subtype classification, they are time-consuming and expensive and require highly trained workers. Serotyping of HIV-1 by antibody (Ab) binding to the V3 region has been suggested as an alternative approach (8, 40, 49, 51). Such an approach may make it possible to identify subtypes based on antigenic rather than genetic properties. This immunological information about antigenic diversity might be of value in vaccine development. We recently developed a subtype-specific enzyme immunoassay (SSEIA) which gave results consistent with those of genotyping (4, 48). This assay used V3 consensus sequences defined by genetic classification, so we wanted to compare the antigenicity of these V3 consensus sequences to the antigenicity of those defined by phenetic analysis. The phenetic clustering of V3 loop amino acid sequences is not always consistent with phylogenetic analysis. Our results suggested that a limited number of serotypes may exist and identified amino acids at the tip of the V3 loop that may be responsible for serological discrimination.     

Multiple Residues Contribute to the Inability of Murine CCR-5 To Function as a Coreceptor for Macrophage-Tropic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates

Infection of CD4-positive cells by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) requires functional interaction of the viral envelope protein with a coreceptor belonging to the chemokine receptor family of seven-membrane-spanning receptors. For the majority of macrophage-tropic HIV-1 isolates, the physiologically relevant coreceptor is the human CCR-5 (hCCR-5) receptor. Although the murine homolog of CCR-5 (mCCR-5) is unable to mediate HIV-1 infection, chimeric hCCR-5/mCCR-5 molecules containing single extracellular domains derived from hCCR-5 are effective coreceptors for certain macrophage-tropic HIV-1 isolates. Here, we have sought to identify residues in hCCR-5 critical for HIV-1 infection by substitution of mCCR-5-derived residues into the context of functional chimeric hCCR-5/mCCR-5 receptor molecules. Using this strategy, we demonstrate that residues 7, 13, and 15 in the first extracellular domain and residue 180 in the third extracellular domain of CCR-5 are important for HIV-1 envelope-mediated membrane fusion. Of interest, certain substitutions, for example, at residues 184 and 185 in the third extracellular domain, have no phenotype when introduced individually but strongly inhibit hCCR-5 coreceptor function when present together. We hypothesize that these changes, which do not preclude chemokine receptor function, may inhibit a conformational transition in hCCR-5 that contributes to HIV-1 infection. Finally, we report that substitution of glycine for valine at residue 5 in CCR-5 can significantly enhance the level of envelope-dependent cell fusion by expressing cells. The diversity of the mutant phenotypes observed in this mutational analysis, combined with their wide distribution across the extracellular regions of CCR-5, emphasizes the complexity of the interaction between HIV-1 envelope and coreceptor.Infection of cells by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) requires interaction of the viral envelope protein with not only CD4 but also a second cell surface molecule, termed a coreceptor (reviewed in reference 19). Coreceptor usage varies significantly among different HIV-1 isolates, although all known coreceptors are members of the G-protein-coupled chemokine receptor family of seven-membrane-spanning receptors. The primary coreceptor used by non-syncytium-inducing, macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) HIV-1 isolates, which constitute the majority of primary isolates, is CCR-5 (1, 6, 8, 12, 27). In contrast, syncytium-inducing, T-cell-line-adapted (T-tropic) HIV-1 isolates predominantly use CXCR-4 as a coreceptor (13). Other chemokine receptors utilized by a small percentage of generally dualtropic HIV-1 isolates include CCR-2b and CCR-3 (6, 11). The importance of two orphan chemokine receptors, termed Bonzo/STRL33 and BOB/GPR15, in infection by HIV-1 remains to be established, although these proteins were recently shown to serve as coreceptors for several simian immunodeficiency virus and HIV-2 isolates (2, 9). The critical importance of CCR-5 for infection by primary, M-tropic HIV-1 isolates, however, has been highlighted by the finding that a small percentage of humans lack a functional CCR-5 gene and as a result appear highly, although not completely, resistant to infection by HIV-1 (17, 22). Importantly, primary T cells derived from such individuals are refractory to infection by M-tropic HIV-1 isolates in vitro (17, 22, 27), thus demonstrating that CCR-5 is the physiologically relevant coreceptor for the majority of primary isolates.At present, relatively little is known about how the viral envelope and coreceptor interact, although it appears clear that interaction is dependent upon a prior conformational shift induced by binding of the envelope gp120 subunit to CD4 (24, 26). This in turn is believed to lead to the formation of a ternary complex, consisting of gp120, coreceptor, and CD4, on the surface of the target cell (15, 24, 26). It is unknown how this protein complex then induces the fusion of the viral and host cell membranes, although the envelope gp41 subunit is believed to play a critical role at this stage.An important unresolved question is the identity of the amino acid residues in gp120 and the coreceptor that interact during infection. However, it is well established that HIV-1 tropism, and hence coreceptor usage, is largely controlled by a small number of residues located in the envelope V3 loop (6, 14, 23, 25). Efforts to identify residues in the CCR-5 coreceptor involved in mediating infection have thus far largely focused on the functional analysis of chimeric receptors generated with human CCR-5 (hCCR-5) and a chemokine receptor lacking coreceptor function, such as the murine CCR-5 homolog (mCCR-5) (3, 5, 20, 21). These studies have led to three major conclusions. Firstly, the residues in hCCR-5 involved in mediating HIV-1 infection are diffuse, being located on at least three of the four extracellular domains of CCR-5. Secondly, these residues are functionally redundant, so that several distinct regions of hCCR-5 can suffice independently to confer coreceptor function when substituted into mCCR-5. Lastly, different HIV-1 envelope proteins interact differently with CCR-5, such that CCR-5 residues important for mediating fusion by one envelope protein may be largely irrelevant to the interaction of CCR-5 with a second envelope protein. Overall, these data demonstrate that the envelope–CCR-5 interaction is likely to be highly complex and to involve the interaction of multiple residues in both proteins.As noted above, the mCCR-5 chemokine receptor, despite extensive sequence similarity to hCCR-5, fails to function as an HIV-1 coreceptor (3, 5, 20). Therefore, it is apparent that one or more of the 20 extracellular residues that differ between mCCR-5 and hCCR-5 must contribute to the interaction with the HIV-1 envelope protein. Using mutational analysis in the context of chimeric mCCR-5/hCCR-5 receptors, we have now identified several residues, located in three of the four extracellular domains of hCCR-5, that play roles in mediating infection by HIV-1.     

Evidence that Antibody-Mediated Neutralization of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 by Sera from Infected Individuals Is Independent of Coreceptor Usage

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) uses a variety of chemokine receptors as coreceptors for virus entry, and the ability of the virus to be neutralized by antibody may depend on which coreceptors are used. In particular, laboratory-adapted variants of the virus that use CXCR4 as a coreceptor are highly sensitive to neutralization by sera from HIV-1-infected individuals, whereas primary isolates that use CCR5 instead of, or in addition to, CXCR4 are neutralized poorly. To determine whether this dichotomy in neutralization sensitivity could be explained by differential coreceptor usage, virus neutralization by serum samples from HIV-1-infected individuals was assessed in MT-2 cells, which express CXCR4 but not CCR5, and in mitogen-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), where multiple coreceptors including CXCR4 and CCR5 are available for use. Our results showed that three of four primary isolates with a syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype and that use CXCR4 and CCR5 were neutralized poorly in both MT-2 cells and PBMC. The fourth isolate, designated 89.6, was more sensitive to neutralization in MT-2 cells than in PBMC. We showed that the neutralization of 89.6 in PBMC was not improved when CCR5 was blocked by having RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β in the culture medium, indicating that CCR5 usage was not responsible for the decreased sensitivity to neutralization in PBMC. Consistent with this finding, a laboratory-adapted strain of virus (IIIB) was significantly more sensitive to neutralization in CCR5-deficient PBMC (homozygous Δ32-CCR5 allele) than were two of two SI primary isolates tested. The results indicate that the ability of HIV-1 to be neutralized by sera from infected individuals depends on factors other than coreceptor usage.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the etiologic agent of AIDS, utilizes the HLA class II receptor, CD4, as its primary receptor to gain entry into cells (17, 30). Entry is initiated by a high-affinity interaction between CD4 and the surface gp120 of the virus (32). Subsequent to this interaction, conformational changes that permit fusion of the viral membrane with cellular membranes occur within the viral transmembrane gp41 (9, 58, 59). In addition to CD4, one or more recently described viral coreceptors are needed for fusion to take place. These coreceptors belong to a family of seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled proteins and include the CXC chemokine receptor CXCR4 (3, 4, 24, 44), the CC chemokine receptors CCR5 (1, 12, 13, 18, 21, 23, 45) and, less commonly, CCR3 and CCR2b (12, 21), and two related orphan receptors termed BONZO/STRL33 and BOB (19, 34). Coreceptor usage by HIV-1 can be blocked by naturally occurring ligands, including SDF-1 for CXCR4 (4, 44), RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β in the case of CCR5 (13, 45), and eotaxin for CCR3 (12).The selective cellular tropisms of different strains of HIV-1 may be determined in part by coreceptor usage. For example, all culturable HIV-1 variants replicate initially in mitogen-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), but only a minor fraction are able to infect established CD4⁺ T-cell lines (43). This differential tropism is explained by the expression of CXCR4 together with CCR5 and other CC chemokine coreceptors on PBMC and the lack of expression of CCR5 on most T-cell lines (5, 10, 19, 35, 39, 50, 53). Indeed, low-passage field strains (i.e., primary isolates) of HIV-1 that fail to replicate in T-cell lines use CCR5 as their major coreceptor and are unable to use CXCR4 (1, 12, 18, 21, 23, 28). Because these isolates rarely produce syncytia in PBMC and fail to infect MT-2 cells, they are often classified as having a non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) phenotype. Primary isolates with a syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype are able to use CXCR4 alone or, more usually, in addition to CCR5 (16, 20, 51). HIV-1 variants that have been passaged multiple times in CD4⁺ T-cell lines, and therefore considered to be laboratory adapted, exhibit a pattern of coreceptor usage that resembles that of SI primary isolates. Most studies have shown that the laboratory-adapted strain IIIB uses CXCR4 alone (3, 13, 20, 24, 51) and that MN and SF-2 use CXCR4 primarily and CCR5 to a lesser degree (11, 13). Sequences within the V3 loop of gp120 have been shown to be important, either directly or indirectly, for the interaction of HIV-1 with both CXCR4 (52) and CCR5 (12, 14, 54, 60). This region of gp120 contains multiple determinants of cellular tropism (43) and is a major target for neutralizing antibodies to laboratory-adapted HIV-1 but not to primary isolates (29, 46, 57).It has been known for some time that the ability of sera from HIV-1-infected individuals to neutralize laboratory-adapted strains of HIV-1 does not predict their ability to neutralize primary isolates in vitro (7). In general, the former viruses are highly sensitive to neutralization whereas the latter viruses are neutralized poorly by antibodies induced in response to HIV-1 infection (7, 43). Importantly, neutralizing antibodies generated by candidate HIV-1 subunit vaccines have been highly specific for laboratory-adapted viruses (26, 37, 38). In principle, the dichotomy in neutralization sensitivity between these two categories of virus could be related to coreceptor usage. To test this, we investigated whether the use of CXCR4 in the absence of CCR5 would render SI primary isolates highly sensitive to neutralization in vitro by sera from HIV-1-infected individuals. Two similar studies using human monoclonal antibodies and soluble CD4 have been reported (31a, 55).     

Detailed Mechanistic Insights into HIV-1 Sensitivity to Three Generations of Fusion Inhibitors

Peptides based on the second heptad repeat (HR2) of viral class I fusion proteins are effective inhibitors of virus entry. One such fusion inhibitor has been approved for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (T20, enfuvirtide). Resistance to T20 usually maps to the peptide binding site in HR1. To better understand fusion inhibitor potency and resistance, we combined virological, computational, and biophysical experiments with comprehensive mutational analyses and tested resistance to T20 and second and third generation inhibitors (T1249 and T2635). We found that most amino acid substitutions caused resistance to the first generation peptide T20. Only charged amino acids caused resistance to T1249, and none caused resistance to T2635. Depending on the drug, we can distinguish four mechanisms of drug resistance: reduced contact, steric obstruction, electrostatic repulsion, and electrostatic attraction. Implications for the design of novel antiviral peptide inhibitors are discussed.The HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein complex (Env),³ a class I viral fusion protein, is responsible for viral attachment to CD4⁺ target T cells and subsequent fusion of viral and cellular membranes resulting in release of the viral core in the cell. Other examples of viruses using class I fusion proteins are Coronaviridae (severe acute respiratory syndrome virus), Paramyxoviridae (Newcastle disease virus, human respiratory syncytial virus, Nipah virus, Hendra virus), and Orthomyxoviridae (influenza virus), some of which cause fatal diseases in humans (1–3). The entry process of these viruses is an attractive target for therapeutic intervention.The functional trimeric Env spike on HIV-1 virions consists of three gp120 and three gp41 molecules that are the products of cleavage of the precursor gp160 by cellular proteases such as furin (4, 5). The gp120 surface subunits are responsible for binding to the cellular receptors, whereas the gp41 subunits anchor the complex in the viral membrane and mediate the fusion of viral and cellular membranes. Env undergoes several conformational changes that culminate in membrane fusion. The gp120 subunit binds the CD4 receptor, resulting in creation and/or exposure of the binding site for a coreceptor, usually CCR5 or CXCR4 (6, 7). Two α-helical leucine zipper-like motifs, heptad repeat 1 (HR1) and heptad repeat 2 (HR2), located in the extracellular part of gp41, play a major role in the following conformational changes. Binding of the receptors to gp120 induces formation of the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 in which HR1 is exposed and the N-terminal fusion peptide is inserted into the target cell membrane (1, 8–12). Subsequently, three HR1 and three HR2 domains assemble into a highly stable six-helix bundle structure that juxtaposes the viral and cellular membranes for the membrane merger. Other viruses with class I viral fusion proteins use similar HR1-HR2-mediated membrane fusion for target cell entry.Peptides based on the HR domains of class I viral fusion proteins have proven to be efficient inhibitors of virus entry for a broad range of viruses (13–17). The HIV-1 fusion inhibitor T20 (enfuvirtide (Fuzeon)) has been approved for clinical use. T20 mimics HR2 and can bind to HR1, thereby preventing the formation of the six-helix bundle (Fig. 1) (18–21). T1249 is a second-generation fusion inhibitor with improved antiviral potency compared with the first-generation peptide T20 (22–25). Recently, a series of more potent third-generation fusion inhibitors were designed (26, 27). These include T2635, which has an improved helical structure that increases stability and activity against both wild type (WT) HIV-1 and fusion inhibitor resistant variants.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Schematic of the gp41 ectodomain. HR1 and HR2 are represented as cylinders, and position 38 in HR1 is indicated. Residues Gln-142, Asn-145, Glu-146, and Leu-149, which interact with residue 38, are underlined in the HR2 sequence. HR2-based peptide fusion inhibitors are shown underneath. Mutations introduced in T1249^mut and T2635^mut are bold and underlined. Numbering is based on the sequence of HXB2 gp41.Both the in vitro and in vivo selection of resistance has been described for T20 (28–33) and T1249 (23, 34–36). Resistance is often caused by mutations in the HR1 binding site of the fusion inhibitor. In particular, substitutions at positions 36 (G36D/M/S), 38 (V38A/W/M/E), and 43 (N43D/K) of gp41 can cause resistance. Strikingly, substitutions at position 38 can cause resistance to both T20 and T1249, but distinct amino acid substitutions are required. At position 38 only charged amino acids (V38E/R/K) cause resistance to T1249 (35). Surprisingly, none of the known T20 and T1249 resistance mutations at position 38 affect the susceptibility to the third generation inhibitor T2635.We hypothesized that the use of HIV-1 as a model system could provide a more detailed understanding of resistance to fusion inhibitors. We, therefore, analyzed the effect of all 20 amino acids at resistance hotspot 38 on Env function, viral fitness, biochemical properties of gp41, and resistance to the fusion inhibitors. From the results we can propose four resistance mechanisms that differ in the way the drug-target interaction is affected at the molecular level. Furthermore, we can deduce general principles on the mechanisms of resistance against fusion inhibitors and the requirements for effective antiviral drugs.     

Probing HIV-1 Membrane Liquid Order by Laurdan Staining Reveals Producer Cell-dependent Differences

Viruses acquire their envelope by budding from a host cell membrane, but viral lipid composition may differ from that of the budding membrane. We have previously reported that the HIV-1 membrane is highly enriched in cholesterol, sphingolipids, and other raft lipids, suggesting that the virus may bud from pre-existing or virus-induced lipid rafts. Here, we employed the environmentally sensitive fluorescent dye Laurdan to study the membrane lateral structure of HIV-1 derived from different cell lines. Differences in viral membrane order detected by Laurdan staining were shown by mass spectrometry to be due to differences in lipid composition. Isogenic viruses from two different cell lines were both strongly enriched in raft lipids and displayed a liquid-ordered membrane, but these effects were significantly more pronounced for HIV-1 from the T-cell line MT-4 compared with virus from 293T cells. Host-dependent differences in the lipidomes predominantly affected the ratio of sphingomyelins (including dihydrosphingomyelin) to phosphatidylcholine, whereas cholesterol contents were similar. Accordingly, treatment of infectious HIV-1 with the sphingomyelin-binding toxins Equinatoxin-II or lysenin showed differential inhibition of infectivity. Liposomes consisting of lipids that had been extracted from viral particles exhibited slightly less liquid order than the respective viral membranes, which is likely to be due to absence of membrane proteins and to loss of lipid asymmetry. Synthetic liposomes consisting of a quaternary lipid mixture emulating the viral lipids showed a liquid order similar to liposomes derived from virion lipids. Thus, Laurdan staining represents a rapid and quantitative method to probe viral membrane liquid order and may prove useful in the search for lipid active drugs.HIV-1³ is an enveloped retrovirus, which acquires its lipid envelope by budding from the plasma membrane of the infected host cell. Several reports have shown that the viral membrane is enriched in sphingomyelin (SM), including the unusual sphingolipid dihydrosphingomyelin (DHSM) and collectively referred to as sphingomyelins (SMs), glycosphingolipids, cholesterol (CHOL), saturated phosphoglycerolipids and phosphoinositides (1–4). Moreover the CHOL/phospholipid and protein/lipid ratios of the HIV-1 membrane are high, corresponding to a highly ordered membrane, and are presumed to be different from the overall host cell plasma membrane. Accordingly, the HIV-1 envelope has been considered to be a large raft-like membrane microdomain (3). This is in line with previous reports describing enrichment of raft markers in the HIV-1 membrane and its sensitivity to CHOL-depleting agents (5–9). Furthermore, HIV-1 glycoproteins have been suggested to localize within membrane rafts due to palmitoylation of two cysteines (10), and the main structural Gag protein has been shown to rapidly relocalize to detergent-resistant membranes after initial membrane binding (6).Membrane microdomains are dynamic assemblies resulting from the lateral interaction of lipids and proteins. Two phases coexist in the plasma membrane: the liquid-ordered phase (l_o), mainly composed of CHOL and sphingolipids (SPLs), and the liquid disordered phase (l_d), mainly composed of glycerophospholipids (11–13). In the activated state, l_o microdomains can coalesce and serve as platforms for membrane trafficking, signaling, and virus budding (14, 15). The first method to biochemically enrich membrane rafts was the purification of detergent-resistant membranes, based on their resistance to extraction with non-ionic detergent at 4 °C (16). However, this and other methods based on antibody or cholera toxin binding may lead to artificial aggregation of membrane microdomains and thus do not necessarily represent their native state (17, 18). For these reasons and because the association and dissociation of membrane microdomains appears to occur on a rapid time-scale and the raft size is too small to be optically resolved, the raft concept remains controversial. However, the determination of the HIV-1 lipidome, a native membrane purified without any detergent, has provided strong evidence for the existence of these microdomains (3).Fluorescent lipid analogs that partition preferentially into a specialized lipid phase could be an attractive tool to study membrane microdomains. However, partitioning of such dyes mainly depends on the local chemical environment and not on the phase state of the membrane (19–21). In contrast, Laurdan (6-dodecanoyl-2-dimethylaminonapthalene) is a lipophilic dye that binds to membranes independent of their phase state but reports the phase state by a change in its fluorescence emission (20). Laurdan exhibits a blue shift in its emission spectrum with increasing membrane condensation. This is caused by an alteration in the dipole moment of the probe as a consequence of exclusion of water molecules from the lipid bilayer. Thus, excitation of membrane bound Laurdan leads to two emission maxima representing differences in membrane lateral structure. Quantification of membrane order is achieved by computing the Generalized Polarization (GP) value, which is defined as normalized intensity ratio of the two emission channels. GP values range from +1 (most condensed) to −1 (most fluid). They are not biased by probe concentration, membrane ruffles, and surface modifications, such as lipoprotein binding. Furthermore, there is no preferential interaction with a specific lipid, fatty acid, or head group (20, 21). GP value correspondence to different lipid phases was estimated using liposomes with a composition similar to that of cellular membranes (22, 23). Using an equimolar mixture of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, CHOL, and SM as an l_o membrane, and 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) as an l_d and solid ordered (s_o) phase, GP values below +0.25 were shown to correspond to the l_d phase, GP values between +0.25 and +0.5 to the l_o phase, and GP values above +0.5 to the s_o phase (22, 23).Laurdan has been extensively used to characterize domain formation and lateral lipid segregation in model membranes composed of different phospholipid mixtures or lipids extracted from cellular membranes (19, 22–25). It has also been used to study the membrane structure in living cells. Gaus and coworkers observed l_o domains enriched on membrane protrusions (filopodia), adhesion points, and cell-cell contacts (26). They also used Laurdan to address the physical properties of the plasma membrane around the T-cell receptor in activated T cells, observing larger and more stably ordered membrane domains at sites of T-cell activation (27). Quantitative determination of cellular plasma membrane order by fluorescence spectroscopy is complicated due to the rapid internalization and redistribution of the probes to other cellular membranes, making it difficult to interpret the fluorescence measurements over the whole cell. This problem is not encountered in purified virus particles, because they contain only a single membrane. We therefore developed an assay to study viral membrane lateral structure by fluorescence spectroscopy. For this purpose, isogenic HIV-1 particles were produced in two different cell lines, and their GP profiles were determined. In parallel, the lipid constituents were quantified by mass spectrometry. The viral membrane displayed a l_o structure in both cases, but this was more prominent for the virus derived from the T-cell line MT-4 compared with virus derived from 293T cells. The validity of this result was supported by comparing the lipidome of the two viruses, which revealed a significantly higher SMs/phosphatidylcholine (PC) ratio for the MT-4-derived virus. Accordingly, treatment with SM-binding toxins inactivated MT-4-derived virus more efficiently than 293T-derived virus, whereas both viruses exhibited similar infectivities before treatment. The reported approach allows rapid determination of differences in viral membrane order, permitting screening for compounds that perturb l_o domains, which may act as antivirals of a novel type.     

A Comprehensive Panel of Near-Full-Length Clones and Reference Sequences for Non-Subtype B Isolates of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Non-subtype B viruses cause the vast majority of new human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infections worldwide and are thus the major focus of international vaccine efforts. Although their geographic dissemination is carefully monitored, their immunogenic and biological properties remain largely unknown, in part because well-characterized virological reference reagents are lacking. In particular, full-length clones and sequences are rare, since subtype classification is frequently based on small PCR-derived viral fragments. There are only five proviral clones available for viruses other than subtype B, and these represent only 3 of the 10 proposed (group M) sequence subtypes. This lack of reference sequences also confounds the identification and analysis of mosaic (recombinant) genomes, which appear to be arising with increasing frequency in areas where multiple sequence subtypes cocirculate. To generate a more representative panel of non-subtype B reference reagents, we have cloned (by long PCR or lambda phage techniques) and sequenced 10 near-full-length HIV-1 genomes (lacking less than 80 bp of long terminal repeat sequences) from primary isolates collected at major epicenters of the global AIDS pandemic. Detailed phylogenetic analyses identified six that represented nonrecombinant members of HIV-1 subtypes A (92UG037.1), C (92BR025.8), D (84ZR085.1 and 94UG114.1), F (93BR020.1), and H (90CF056.1), the last two comprising the first full-length examples of these subtypes. Four others were found to be complex mosaics of subtypes A and C (92RW009.6), A and G (92NG083.2 and 92NG003.1), and B and F (93BR029.4), again emphasizing the impact of intersubtype recombination on global HIV-1 diversification. Although a number of clones had frameshift mutations or translational stop codons in major open reading frames, all the genomes contained a complete set of genes and three had intact genomic organizations without inactivating mutations. Reconstruction of one of these (94UG114.1) yielded replication-competent virus that grew to high titers in normal donor peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures. This panel of non-subtype B reference genomes should prove valuable for structure-function studies of genetically diverse viral gene products, the generation of subtype-specific immunological reagents, and the production of DNA- and protein-based subunit vaccines directed against a broader spectrum of viruses.One critical question facing current AIDS vaccine development efforts is to what extent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genetic variation has to be considered in the design of candidate vaccines (11, 21, 41, 72). Phylogenetic analyses of globally circulating viral strains have identified two distinct groups of HIV-1 (M and O) (33, 45, 61, 62), and 10 sequence subtypes (A to J) have been proposed within the major group (M) (29, 30, 45, 72). Sequence variation among viruses belonging to these different lineages is extensive, with envelope amino acid sequence variation ranging from 24% between different subtypes to 47% between the two different groups. Given this extent of diversity, the question has been raised whether immunogens based on a single virus strain can be expected to elicit immune responses effective against a broad spectrum of viruses or whether vaccine preparations should include mixtures of genetically divergent antigens and/or be tailored toward locally circulating strains (11, 21, 41, 72). This is of particular concern in developing countries, where multiple subtypes of HIV-1 are known to cocirculate and where subtype B viruses (which have been the source of most current candidate vaccine preparations [10, 21]) are rare or nonexistent (5, 24, 40, 72).Although the extent of global HIV-1 variation is well defined, little is known about the biological consequences of this genetic diversity and its impact on cellular and humoral immune responses in the infected host. In particular, it remains unknown whether subtype-specific differences in virus biology exist that have to be considered for vaccine design. Thus far, such differences have not been identified. For example, several studies have shown that there is no correlation between HIV-1 genetic subtypes and neutralization serotypes (38, 42, 46, 68). Some viruses are readily neutralized, while most are relatively neutralization resistant (42). Although the reasons for these different susceptibilities remain unknown, it is clear that neutralization is not a function of the viral genotype (38, 42, 46, 68). Similarly, recent studies have identified vigorous cross-clade cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) reactivities in individuals infected with viruses from several different clades (3, 6), as well as in recipients of a clade B vaccine (15). These results are very encouraging, since they suggest that CTL cross-recognition among HIV-1 clades is much more prevalent than previously anticipated and that immunogens based on a limited number of variants may be able to elicit a broad CTL response (6). Nevertheless, it would be premature to conclude that HIV-1 variation poses no problem for AIDS vaccine design. Only a comprehensive analysis of genetically defined representatives of the various groups and subtypes will allow us to judge whether certain variants differ in fundamental viral properties and whether such differences will have to be incorporated into vaccine strategies. Obviously, such studies require well-characterized reference reagents, in particular full-length and replication-competent molecular clones that can be used for functional and biological studies.Full-length reference sequences representing the various subtypes are also urgently needed for phylogenetic comparisons. Recent analyses of subgenomic (23, 52, 54, 58) as well as full-length (7, 18, 53, 60) HIV-1 sequences identified a surprising number of HIV-1 strains which clustered in different subtypes in different parts of their genome. All of these originated from geographic regions where multiple subtypes cocirculated and are the results of coinfections with highly divergent viruses (52, 60, 62). Detailed phylogenetic characterization revealed that most of them have a complex genome structure with multiple points of crossover (7, 18, 53, 60). Some recombinants, like the “subtype E” viruses, which are in fact A/E recombinants (7, 18), have a widespread geographic dissemination and are responsible for much of the Asian HIV-1 epidemic (69, 70). In other areas, recombinants appear to be generated with increasing frequencies since many randomly chosen isolates exhibit evidence of mosaicism (4, 8, 31, 66, 71). Since recombination provides the opportunity for evolutionary leaps with genetic consequences that are far greater than those of the steady accumulation of individual mutations, the impact of recombination on viral properties must be monitored. We therefore need full-length nonrecombinant reference sequences for all major HIV-1 groups and subtypes before we can map and characterize the extent of intersubtype recombination.The number of molecular reagents for non-subtype B viruses is very limited. There are currently only five full-length, nonrecombinant molecular clones available for viruses other than subtype B (45), and these represent only three of the proposed (group M) subtypes (A, C, and D). Moreover, only three clones (all derived from subtype D viruses) are replication competent and thus useful for studies requiring functional gene products (45, 48, 65). Given the unknown impact of genetic variation on correlates of immune protection, subtype-specific reagents are critically needed for phylogenetic, immunological, and biological studies. In this paper, we report the cloning (by long PCR and lambda techniques) of 10 near-full-length HIV-1 genomes from isolates previously classified as non-subtype B viruses. Detailed phylogenetic analysis showed that six comprise nonmosaic representatives of five major subtypes, including two for which full-length representatives have not been reported. Four others were identified as complex intersubtype recombinants, again emphasizing the prevalence of hybrid genomes among globally circulating HIV-1 strains. We also describe a strategy for the biological evaluation of long-PCR-derived genomes and report the generation of a replication-competent provirus by this approach. The effect of these reagents on vaccine development is discussed.     

Multimerization and DNA Binding Properties of INI1/hSNF5 and Its Functional Significance

INI1/hSNF5/BAF47/SMARCB1 is an HIV-1 integrase (IN)-binding protein that modulates viral replication in multiple ways. A minimal IN-binding domain of INI1, S6 (amino acids 183–294), transdominantly inhibits late events, and down-modulation of INI1 stimulates early events of HIV-1 replication. INI1 both stimulates and inhibits in vitro integration depending on IN concentration. To gain further insight into its role in HIV-1 replication, we purified and biochemically characterized INI1. We found that INI1 forms multimeric structures. Deletion analysis indicated that the Rpt1 and Rpt2 motifs form the minimal multimerization domain. We isolated mutants of INI1 that are defective for multimerization using a reverse yeast two-hybrid system. Our results revealed that INI1 residues involved in multimerization overlap with IN-binding and nuclear export domains and are required for nuclear retention and co-localization with IN. Multimerization-defective mutants are also defective for mediating the transdominant effect of INI1-S6-(183–294). Furthermore, we found that INI1 is a minor groove DNA-binding protein. Although IN binding and multimerization are required for INI1-mediated inhibition, the acceptor DNA binding property of INI1 may be required for stimulation of in vitro strand transfer activities of IN. Binding of INI1 to IN results in the formation of presumably inactive high molecular weight IN-INI1 complexes, and the multimerization-defective mutant was unable to form these complexes. These results indicate that the multimerization and IN binding properties of INI1 are necessary for its ability to both inhibit integration and influence assembly and particle production, providing insights into the mechanism of INI1-mediated effects in HIV-1 replication.HIV-1³ replication is a dynamic process that is modulated by the interaction of several host cellular proteins (1). A genome-wide siRNA-mediated knockdown indicated that hundreds of host factors are involved in the stimulation or inhibition of HIV-1 replication (2). Understanding the interplay between the host proteins and the HIV-1 viral proteins is essential to fully comprehend the dynamic relationship between the virus and the host.INI1/hSNF5/BAF47/SMARCB1 is a core component of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex. It interacts directly with the HIV-1-encoded integrase (IN) required for the integration of the viral DNA into the host chromosome (3, 4). IN mediates the insertion of viral cDNA into host chromosomal DNA by sequential steps of 3′ processing and strand transfer (or joining) (4, 5). INI1 binds directly to HIV-1 IN in vitro and in vivo and modulates several steps of HIV-1 replication (3, 6–8). The ectopically expressed minimal IN-binding domain of INI1 transdominantly and potently inhibits HIV-1 assembly and particle production (8). The inhibitory effect is dependent on IN-INI1 interaction and is abrogated when an IN mutant defective for interaction with INI1 is used (8). Furthermore, particle production is minimal in cells lacking INI1, and reintroduction of INI1 into these cells can partially correct the defect (6). These results indicate that INI1 is required for HIV-1 late events. Additional studies have indicated that INI1 is selectively incorporated into HIV-1 but not other retroviral and lentiviral particles (9). Virally encapsidated INI1 is required for post-entry early events of HIV-1 replication prior to integration (6). These studies indicate that producer cell-associated as well as virion-associated INI1 is required for HIV-1 replication. Contrary to these proviral functions of INI1, siRNA-mediated knockdown studies indicate that INI1 in the target cells inhibits early events of HIV-1 replication (7). These studies indicate that whereas INI1 in the target cells may act as an antiviral host protein, HIV-1 may subvert the INI1 antiviral effect, and HIV-1 may utilize this host factor for late events in the producer cells and for early preintegration events in the target cells. Interestingly, in an earlier study, we demonstrated that partially purified INI1 both inhibits and stimulates in vitro integration in a manner dependent on IN concentration (3). Although INI1 stimulates in vitro strand transfer reactions at low IN concentrations, it inhibits the reaction at high concentrations (3). Further structure-function analysis of INI1 is required to understand this complex and dual role of INI1 during HIV-1 replication.INI1 gene is also a tumor suppressor that is biallelically deleted in aggressive pediatric cancers known as rhabdoid tumors (10). INI1 mutations have been found in other soft tissue cancers (11–13). The mechanism of INI1-mediated tumor suppression is not fully understood. INI1 protein has two highly conserved domains that are imperfect direct repeats (termed Rpt1 and Rpt2) of each other and a third conserved coiled coil domain (termed homology region 3 or HR3) at the C terminus. The Rpt1 and Rpt2 domains appear to be involved in protein-protein interaction with various cellular and viral proteins (3, 14–18). Additionally, the Rpt2 domain harbors a masked nuclear export signal, and the C-terminal domain is involved in inhibiting the nuclear export of the protein in the steady state. INI1 exhibits nonspecific DNA binding activity (18). The cancer-associated mutations occur throughout the open reading frame of the INI1 gene, suggesting that mutation in any one of the INI1 domains may inactivate the protein and that multiple domains are required for its function (19–21).To gain further insight into the mechanism of its action, we purified INI1 protein to homogeneity and characterized it biochemically. Here we report, for the first time, that INI1 forms dimeric and higher order multimeric structures. We have characterized the multimerization domain of INI1 and found that multimerization and IN binding activities of INI1 are required for inhibition of in vitro integration. Furthermore, we found that the multimerization, IN binding, and nuclear export properties of INI1 are important for transdominant effects. In addition, we found that INI1 possesses a minor groove DNA binding activity and that the nonspecific acceptor DNA binding activity of INI1 may be required for stimulation of in vitro integration. Finally, we found that multimerization of the full-length protein is necessary for its ability to be retained in the nucleus and to co-localize with HIV-1 IN in the nucleus. Thus, our studies provide novel insights into the mechanism by which INI1 regulates HIV-1 replication.