Half-site spacing and orientation determines whether thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors and related factors bind to DNA response elements as monomers, homodimers, or heterodimers.

The receptors for thyroid hormone (T3R) and retinoic acid (RAR) are members of a nuclear receptor subfamily that are capable of recognizing similar DNA sequences. Native response elements for T3R and RAR consist of two or more putative half-site binding motifs organized as imperfect direct or inverted repeats separated by different sized nucleotide gaps. To clarify how T3R, RAR, and related factors recognize DNA response elements, we analyzed the interaction of purified receptors with a series of inverted and direct repeats of an idealized AGGTCA half-site separated by different sized nucleotide gaps. Our results indicate that RAR and T3R can bind to half-sites as monomers and, depending on the orientation and distance between half-sites, also bind as homodimers or T3R-RAR heterodimers. T3R also binds to certain DNA elements as a heterodimer with one or more nuclear factors from eucaryotic cells. Thus, the orientation and spacing of half-sites play a central role in determining which configuration of receptors and nuclear factors will interact with a specific DNA element. This along with the ability of these factors to participate in reversible protein-protein interactions serve to broaden and diversify the responses mediated by T3R, RAR, and related members of this nuclear receptor subfamily.     

Differential capacity of wild type promoter elements for binding and trans-activation by retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors.

Retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and thyroid hormone receptor (T3R) are structurally similar and can bind as homodimers or T3R-RAR heterodimers to a single synthetic DNA response element. The interaction of these two types of receptors with wild type elements, however, has not been systematically investigated. Promoter elements from genes regulated by retinoic acid (RA) or thyroid hormone (T3) were tested for response to T3 and RA in transient transfections in both JEG and COS cells. The elements were classified as primarily responsive to RA or to T3 or responsive to both ligands. Binding of highly purified RAR alpha and T3R alpha to the various elements was assessed using the gel shift assay. Those elements predominantly responsive to one ligand showed preferential binding to the appropriate receptor. A series of point mutations were introduced into the rat GH T3 response element to further define sequence requirements for response to both RA and T3. Down-mutations in any of the three hexamers (previously demonstrated to be required for full response to T3 and full binding of T3R) also decreased RA induction and RAR binding. However, only one of two sets of up-mutations for T3 response also increased RA induction, demonstrating differences in hexamer preference between RAR and T3R. Variation in spacing of the three hexamers did not influence RA vs. T3 induction or RAR vs. T3R binding according to the predictions of a simple hexamer spacing model. There was a strong correlation between the extent of T3R dimer binding and strength of T3 induction for a subset of elements studied in JEG cells (r = 0.97, P < 0.01) and a weaker but significant correlation in COS cells (r = 0.65, P < 0.05)). In contrast, RAR dimer binding by the wild type elements did not quantitatively correlate with RA induction in either JEG (r = 0.13, P > 0.05) or COS cells (r = 0.21, P > 0.05). These results suggests that RAR interacts with a heterodimer partner(s) which influences binding site specificity, whereas T3R heterodimer partner(s) is less likely to alter binding site recognition. The observed difference in COS and JEG cells as well as the weak T3R binding-function relationship of the malic enzyme element, however, suggest that the influence of T3R heterodimer partner(s) on binding site specificity is likely to vary with cell type and the specific element tested.     

RXR alpha, a promiscuous partner of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors.

Retinoic acid receptor (RAR), thyroid hormone receptor (T3R) and vitamin D3 receptor (VD3R) differ from steroid hormone receptors in that they bind and transactivate through responsive elements organized as direct rather than inverted repeats. We now show that recombinant RAR and T3R are monomers in solution and cannot form stable homodimeric complexes on their responsive elements. Stable binding of the receptors to their responsive elements requires heterodimerization with a nuclear factor. This auxiliary factor is tightly associated with RAR and T3R in the absence of DNA and co-purifies with both receptors. As demonstrated by extensive purification, the same auxiliary factor is required for stable DNA binding of RAR as for that of T3R; the factor also facilitates the formation of a stable VD3R-DNA complex. The auxiliary factor is identical to the retinoid X receptor alpha (RXR alpha) by biochemical and functional criteria. The identification of RXR alpha as a dimerization partner for the RARs, T3Rs and VD3R has important implications as to the function of these receptors and their ligands in development, homeostasis and neoplasia.     

Convergence of vitamin D and retinoic acid signalling at a common hormone response element

Although 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D3) and retinoic acid (RA) have distinct developmental and physiological roles, both regulate the cell cycle. We provide molecular and genomic evidence that their cognate nuclear receptors regulate common genes through everted repeat TGA(C/T)TPyN8PuG(G/T)TCA (ER8) response elements. ER8 motifs were found in the promoters of several target genes of 1,25D3 and/or RA. Notably, an element was characterized in the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p19ink4d gene, and 1,25D3- or RA-induced p19INK4D) expression. P19ink4d knockdown together with depletion of p27kip1, another CDK inhibitor regulated by 1,25D3 and RA, rendered cells resistant to ligand-induced growth arrest. Remarkably, p19INK4D-deficient cells showed increased autophagic cell death, which was markedly enhanced by 1,25D3, but not RA, and attenuated by loss of p27KIP1. These results show a limited crosstalk between 1,25D3 and RA signalling by means of overlapping nuclear receptor DNA binding specificities, and uncover a role for p19INK4D in control of cell survival.     

A nuclear factor that enhances binding of thyroid hormone receptors to thyroid hormone response elements

Recent studies from this laboratory have demonstrated the presence of thyroid hormone response elements (TREs) in the 5'-flanking region of the rat alpha and TSH beta subunit genes. Using an avidin-biotin complex DNA binding assay, we have shown that these TREs bind the thyroid hormone (T3) receptor present in nuclear extracts of GH3 cells, as well as the in vitro synthesized Hc-erbA beta, which has been identified as a member of the family of T3 receptors. The binding of Hc-erbA beta to the alpha subunit TRE can be enhanced 3-4-fold by including GH3 nuclear extract in the binding assay. Binding to the TRE present in the TSH beta gene or the rat growth hormone gene was similarly enhanced, although to a lesser degree. The enhanced binding activity is trypsin-sensitive and heat labile, and is not reproduced by the addition of histones, bovine serum albumin, or cytosol instead of nuclear extract. Gel exclusion chromatography suggests a molecular size of approximately 65,000 Da. This protein, which is present in several different cell types, is also able to complement binding of the rat erbA alpha-1 and the pituitary-specific erbA beta-2 forms of the receptor. These data suggest that the binding of the T3 receptor to a TRE is augmented by another nuclear protein, which may be involved in the mechanism of action of thyroid hormone.     

Terminal differentiation in keratinocytes involves positive as well as negative regulation by retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors at retinoid response elements.

Terminal differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes is inhibited by 1 microM retinoic acid, a concentration which induces differentiation in a number of cell types, including F9 teratocarcinoma cells. The molecular basis for these opposing retinoid responses is unknown, although retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoid X receptors (RXRs) have been detected in both cell types. When F9 cells are stably transfected with a truncated RAR alpha lacking the E/F domain necessary for ligand binding and RAR/RXR dimerization, action at retinoid response elements is suppressed and cells produce a retinoic acid-resistant phenotype; i.e., they are blocked in differentiation (A. S. Espeseth, S. P. Murphy, and E. Linney, Genes Dev. 3:1647-1656, 1989). If retinoid receptors influence epidermal differentiation only in a negative fashion, then suppression of transactivation at retinoid response elements would be expected to enhance, rather than block, keratinocyte differentiation. In this study, we show that surprisingly, even though constitutive expression of an analogous truncated RAR gamma in keratinocytes specifically suppressed transactivation at retinoid response elements, keratinocytes were blocked, rather than enhanced, in their ability to undergo morphological and biochemical features of differentiation. These findings demonstrate a direct and hitherto unrecognized role for RARs and RXRs in positively as well as negatively regulating epidermal differentiation. Additionally, our studies extend those of Espeseth et al. (Genes Dev. 3:1647-1656, 1989), indicating a novel RAR function independent of the E/F domain.     

Novel mode of deoxyribonucleic acid recognition by thyroid hormone receptors: thyroid hormone receptor beta-isoforms can bind as trimers to natural response elements comprised of reiterated half-sites

Thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) regulate gene expression by binding to specific DNA sequences, denoted thyroid hormone response elements (TREs). The accepted paradigm for TRs proposes that they bind as homo- or heterodimers to TREs comprised of two AGGTCA half-site sequences. In the prototypic TRE, these half-sites are arranged as direct repeats separated by a four-base spacer. This dimeric model of TR binding, derived from analysis of artificial DNA sequences, fails to explain why many natural TREs contain more than two half-sites. Therefore, we investigated the ability of different TR isoforms to bind to TREs possessing three or more half-sites. We report that the TRbeta isoforms (TRbeta0, TRbeta1, TRbeta2), but not TRalpha1, can bind to reiterated DNA elements, such as the rat GH-TRE, as complexes trimeric or greater in size. The TRbeta0 isoform, in particular, formed homo- and heterotrimers (with the retinoid X receptor) with high efficiency and cooperativity, and TRbeta0 preferentially used reporters containing these reiterated elements to drive gene expression in vivo. Our data demonstrate that TRbeta isoforms can form multimeric receptor complexes on appropriately reiterated DNA response elements, providing a functional distinction between the TR isoforms and an explanation for TREs possessing three or more half-sites.     

Role of vitamin D3 receptor in the synergistic differentiation of WEHI-3B leukemia cells by vitamin D3 and retinoic acid.

WEHI-3B D- cells differentiate in response to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3) but not to all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) or other inducing agents. Combinations of RA with 1,25-(OH)2D3 interact to produce synergistic differentiation of WEHI-3B D- cells. To determine factors involved in the synergistic interaction, expression of the 1,25-(OH)2D3 receptor (VDR) and retinoid receptors, RARalpha and RXRalpha, was measured. No VDR was detected in untreated WEHI-3B D- cells; however, RA and 1,25-(OH)2D3 when used as single agents caused a slight induction of the VDR and in combination produced a marked increase in the VDR. In contrast, no changes in RARalpha and RXRalpha were initiated by these compounds. An RAR-selective agonist combined with 1,25-(OH)2D3 produced synergistic differentiation of WEHI-3B D- cells, whereas an RXR-selective agonist did not. To gain information on the role of the VDR in the synergistic interaction, the VDR gene was transferred into WEHI-3B D+ cells, in which no VDR was detected and no synergism was produced. Expression of the VDR conferred differentiation responsiveness to 1,25-(OH)2D3 in WEHI-3B D+ cells. These findings suggest that (a) induction of VDR expression is a key component in the synergistic differentiation induced by 1,25-(OH)2D3 and RA and (b) RAR and not RXR must be activated for enhanced induction of the VDR and for the synergistic differentiation produced by RA and 1, 25-(OH)2D3.