Gonadal steroids and neuropeptide Y-opioid-LHRH axis: interactions and diversities

We report that the two classes of regulatory neuropeptides, neuropeptide Y (NPY) and endogenous opioid peptides (EOP), modulate luteinizing hormone (LH) release in diverse fashion in gonad-intact rats. Each neuropeptide acts at two loci, the hypothalamus and pituitary, to excite (NPY) or inhibit (EOP) LH release. At the hypothalamic level, NPY stimulates luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) release, a response mediated by alpha 2-adrenoreceptors and amplified in the presence of adrenergic agonists. At the pituitary level, NPY acts in concert with LHRH to amplify the LH response. In contrast, EOP inhibit LHRH release by decreasing the supply of excitatory adrenergic signals in the vicinity of LHRH neurons in the preoptic-tuberal pathway, and at the pituitary level, they decrease LH release in response to LHRH. Further, the gonadal steroidal milieu facilitates NPY neurosecretion and postsynaptic expression of NPY in concert with adrenergic system; a similar clear-cut facilitatory effect of gonadal steroids on EOP secretion is not yet obvious. Our additional studies imply that the EOP system has the potential to increase sensitivity towards gonadal steroids and that to induce the preovulatory LH surge the neural clock may decrease the inhibitory EOP tone prior to the critical period on proestrus. This antecedent neural event allows the excitatory adrenergic and NPY signals to evoke LHRH secretion at a higher frequency approximating that seen in ovariectomized rats. Further studies are under way to delineate the steroid-induced subcellular events that integrate the action of these regulatory peptides in the control of the episodic LHRH secretion pattern which sustains basal and cyclic gonadotropin release in the rat.     

Changing frequency of pulsatile luteinizing hormone and progesterone secretion during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of rhesus monkeys

Experiments were conducted to examine the pulsatile nature of biologically active luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone secretion during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in rhesus monkeys. As the luteal phase progressed, the pulse frequency of LH release decreased dramatically from a high of one pulse every 90 min during the early luteal phase to a low of one pulse every 7-8 h during the late luteal phase. As the pulse frequency decreased, there was a corresponding increase in pulse amplitude. During the early luteal phase, progesterone secretion was not episodic and there were increments in LH that were not associated with elevations in progesterone. However, during the mid-late luteal phase, progesterone was secreted in a pulsatile fashion. During the midluteal phase (Days 6-7 post-LH surge), 67% of the LH pulses were associated with progesterone pulses, and by the late luteal phase (Days 10-11 post-LH surge), every LH pulse was accompanied by a dramatic and sustained release of progesterone. During the late luteal phase, when the LH profile was characterized by low-frequency, high-amplitude pulses, progesterone levels often rose from less than 1 ng/ml to greater than 9 ng/ml and returned to baseline within a 3-h period. Thus, a single daily progesterone determination is unlikely to be an accurate indicator of luteal function. These results suggest that the changing pattern of mean LH concentrations during the luteal phase occurs as a result of changes in frequency and amplitude of LH release. These changes in the pulsatile pattern of LH secretion appear to have profound effects on secretion of progesterone by the corpus luteum, especially during the mid-late luteal phase when the patterns of LH concentrations are correlated with those of progesterone.     

Effect of time after castration on secretion of LHRH and LH in the ram

Hypophysial portal blood and peripheral blood were obtained from conscious, unrestrained rams to measure simultaneously the secretion of LHRH and LH in entire rams and rams which had been castrated for 2-15 days (short-term castration) and for 1-6 months (long-term castration). The apparatus for portal blood collection was surgically implanted using a transnasal trans-sphenoidal approach and, 4-5 days later, portal blood and peripheral blood were collected simultaneously at 10-min intervals for 8-9 h from 15 sheep. LHRH was clearly secreted in pulses in all three physiological conditions, but there were marked differences in pulse frequencies, which averaged 1 pulse/2-4 h in entire rams, 1 pulse/70 min in short-term castrated rams and 1 pulse/36 min in long-term castrated rams. In entire and short-term castrated animals, LH profiles were also clearly pulsatile and each LHRH pulse in hypophysial portal blood was associated with an LH pulse in the peripheral blood. In long-term castrated animals, LH pulses were not as well defined, because of the high basal levels and small pulse amplitudes, and the temporal relationship between LHRH and LH pulses was not always clear. These results demonstrate the pulsatile nature of LHRH secretion under the three physiological conditions and suggest that the irregular LH profiles characteristic of long-term castrates are due to an inability of the pituitary gland to transduce accurately the hypothalamic signal. The very high frequency of the LHRH pulses may be one of the major reasons for this, and is probably also responsible for the high rate of LH secretion in the long-term castrated animal.     

Effects of intermittent pulsatile infusion of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone on dihydrotestosterone-suppressed gonadotropin secretion in castrate rams

The feedback effects of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on gonadotropin secretion in rams were investigated using DHT-implanted castrate rams (wethers) infused with intermittent pulsatile luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) for 14 days. Castration, as anticipated, reduced both serum testosterone and DHT but elevated serum LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Dihydrotestosterone implants raised serum DHT in wethers to intact ram levels and blocked the LH and FSH response to castration. The secretory profile of these individuals failed to show an endogenous LH pulse during any of the scheduled blood sampling periods, but a small LH pulse was observed following a 5-ng/kg LHRH challenge injection. Dihydrotestosterone-implanted wethers given repeated LHRH injections beginning at the time of castration increased serum FSH and yielded LH pulses that were temporally coupled to exogenous LHRH administration. While the frequency of these secretory episodes was comparable to that observed for castrates, amplitudes of the induced LH pulses were blunted relative to those observed for similarly infused, testosterone-implanted castrates. Dihydrotestosterone was also shown to inhibit LH and FSH secretion and serum testosterone concentrations in intact rams. In summary, it appears that DHT may normally participate in feedback regulation of LH and FSH secretion in rams. These data suggest androgen feedback is regulated by deceleration of the hypothalamic LHRH pulse generator and direct actions at the level of the adenohypophysis.     

Possible negative ultra-short loop feedback of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) in the ovariectomized rat

To determine if LHRH might act within the brain to modify its own release, repeated blood samples were removed from conscious ovariectomized rats and minute doses of LHRH were injected into the third ventricle (3V). The effect of these injections on plasma LH and FSH was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). The higher dose of intraventricular LHRH (10 ng in 2 microliter) induced an increase in plasma LH within 10 min after its injection. Plasma LH decreased for the next 60 min. This was followed by restoration of LH pulses characteristic of the ovariectomized rat. This dose of LHRH slightly elevated plasma FSH concentrations. In stark contrast, a 10 fold lower dose of 1 ng of LHRH injected into the ventricle resulted in a highly significant decrease of plasma LH at 10 min following injection, followed by return of LH pulsations. There was no effect on the pulsatile release of FSH. The results are interpreted to mean that at the higher dose, sufficient LHRH reached the site of origin of the hypophyseal portal vessels in the median eminence so that it diffused into portal vessels and was delivered to the gonadotrophs to induce LH release. In contrast, the lower dose provided sufficient hypothalamic concentrations of the peptide to suppress the discharge of the LHRH neurons, thereby leading to a decline in plasma LH, indicative of an ultrashort-loop negative feedback of LHRH to suppress its own release.     

Release of luteinizing hormone in prepubertal and middle-aged ovariectomized rats

Concentrations of circulating LH were determined in conscious, free-moving ovariectomized rats. All of the animals had been ovariectomized at 24 days of age. Between 30 and 90 days there was an increase in mean blood LH concentrations; a more vigorous pulsatile release of LH characterized by an increase in amplitude and frequency of LH release; and an elevated responsiveness to LHRH administration. Rats which had been ovariectomized for 1 year still had elevated blood LH levels but had episodic pulses of reduced amplitude and a decrease in responsiveness to LHRH. These data suggest that important alterations occur with age in the neuroendocrine mechanisms responsible for the release of LH.     

Amplitude and frequency modulation of pulsatile luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release

Summary 1. A variety of neuroendocrine approaches has been used to characterize cellular mechanisms governing luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) pulse generation. We review recentin vivo microdialysis,in vitro superfusion, andin situ hybridization experiments in which we tested the hypothesis that the amplitude and frequency of LHRH pulses are subject to independent regulation via distinct and identifiable cellular pathways.2. Augmentation of LHRH pulse amplitude is proposed as a central feature of preovulatory LHRH surges. Three mechanisms are described which may contribute to this increase in LHRH pulse amplitude: (a) increased LHRH gene expression, (b) augmentation of facilitatory neurotransmission, and (c) increased responsiveness of LHRH neurons to afferent synaptic signals. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is examined as a prototypical afferent transmitter regulating the generation of LHRH surges through the latter two mechanisms.3. Retardation of LHRH pulse generator frequency is postulated to mediate negative feedback actions of gonadal hormones. Evidence supporting this hypothesis is reviewed, including results ofin vivo monitoring experiments in which LHRH pulse frequency, but not amplitude, is shown to be increased following castration. A role for noradrenergic neurons as intervening targets of gonadal hormone negative feedback actions is discussed.4. Future directions for study of the LHRH pulse generator are suggested.     

Superfused pituitary cell cultures: comparative responsiveness of cells derived from various stages of the estrous cycle to LHRH stimulation administered as short duration pulses

We have reinvestigated the question of maintenance of differential LHRH sensitivity in culture and further investigated the role of pulsatile LHRH in the in vitro release of pulsatile LH and FSH at different stages of the estrous cycle. Pituitaries were collected on each day of the 4 day cycle at 0800. In addition, pituitaries were also collected at 1500 and 1900 on proestrous. The cells were dispersed and exposed 48 hrs later to short duration 4 ng LHRH pulses; this dose was optimized for LH release and was applied at a frequency of 1 pulse/60 min. In terms of absolute magnitude of LH response, observed responsiveness was ranked in the following order: proestrous 1900 greater than estrous 0800 greater than diestrous 1 0800 greater than proestrous 1500 greater than diestrous 2 0800. Responsiveness was significantly greater at proestrous 1900 (p greater than 0.01), estrous 0800 (p greater than 0.05) and diestrous 1 0800 (p greater than 0.05) when compared to either of the other stages tested. The heightened LHRH sensitivity of proestrous was therefore maintained in cell culture indicating that the system should be valid for conducting studies on the control of gonadotropin secretion during this period. FSH did not respond in pulsatile manner to the LHRH levels employed further substantiating recent evidence that LHRH seems to function somehow less directly in FSH as compared to LH secretion.     

Neuroendocrine control of gonadotropin secretion

Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH), a hypothalmic peptide that is concentrated in granules of neurons, has the capacity to release gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone) from the pituitary gland. LHRH has been found in hypophysial portal blood of rats, monkeys, and rabbits. Antibodies to LHRH depress plasma LH concentrations in castrated animals and evoke testicular atrophy, but passive immunization against LHRH does not block the LH surge induced by estrogen in monkeys. Estrogens, progestin, prolactin, and dopamine have marked effects on LH secretion, yet an association between these effects and altered hypophysial portal blood concentrations of LHRH is not established. In view of the paucity of evidence demonstrating such a cause and effect relationship, two alternative proposals have become tenable. One, hormones and neurotransmitters may not alter the levels of portal blood LHRH, but rather alter the frequency of pulsatile LHRH secretion. Two, hormones, such as estrogens, progesterone, and prolactin, may alter the responsiveness of the gonadotropin-secreting cells to LHRH by affecting the secretion of dopamine.     

Oestrogen and progesterone interactions in the control of gonadotrophin and prolactin secretion

Oestrogen and progesterone have marked effects on the secretion of the gonadotrophins and prolactin. During most of the oestrous or menstrual cycle the secretion of gonadotrophin is maintained at a relatively low level by the negative feedback of oestrogen and progesterone on the hypothalamic-pituitary system. The spontaneous ovulatory surge of gonadotrophin is produced by a positive feedback cascade. The cascade is initiated by an increase in the plasma concentration of oestradiol-17 beta which triggers a surge of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) and an increase in pituitary responsiveness to LHRH. The facilitatory action of oestrogen on pituitary responsiveness is reinforced by progesterone and the priming effect of LHRH. How oestrogen and progesterone exert their effects is not clear but the facilitatory effects of oestrogen take about 24 h, and the stimulation of LHRH release is produced by an indirect effect of oestradiol on neurons which are possibly opioid, dopaminergic or noradrenergic and which modulate the activity of LHRH neurons. In the rat, a spontaneous prolactin surge occurs at the same time as the spontaneous ovulatory gonadotrophin surge. The prolactin surge also appears to involve a positive feedback between the brain-pituitary system and the ovary. However, the mechanism of the prolactin surge is poorly understood mainly because the neural control of prolactin release appears to be mediated by prolactin inhibiting as well as releasing factors, and the precise role of these factors has not been established. The control of prolactin release is further complicated by the fact that oestradiol stimulates prolactin synthesis and release by a direct action on the prolactotrophes. Prolactin and gonadotrophin surges also occur simultaneously in several experimental steroid models. A theoretical model is proposed which could explain how oestrogen and progesterone trigger the simultaneous surge of LH and prolactin.     

A GABA-neuropeptide Y (NPY) interplay in LH release

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) stimulates and gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) inhibits LH release in the rat. Since a sub-population of NPY-producing neurons in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) of the hypothalamus co-express GABA, the possibility of an interplay between NPY and GABA in the release of LH was investigated in two ways. First by employing light and electron microscopic double staining for NPY and GABA, using pre and post-immunolabeling on rat brain sections, we detected GABA in NPY immunoreactive axon terminals in the MPOA, one of the primary sites of action of these neurotransmitters/neuromodulators in the regulation of LH release. These morphological findings raised the possibility that inhibitory GABA co-released with NPY may act to restrain the excitatory effects of NPY on LH release. Muscimol (MUS, 0.44 or 1.76 nmol/rat), a GABA(A) receptor agonist, administered intracerebroventricularly (icv), alone failed to affect LH release, but NPY (0.47 nmol/rat icv) alone stimulated LH release in ovarian steroid-primed ovariectomized rats. On the other hand, administration of MUS blocked the NPY-induced stimulation of LH release in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, administration of MUS abolished the excitatory effects on LH release of 1229U91, a selective NPY Y4 receptor agonist. These results support the possibility that in the event of co-release of these neurotransmitters/neuromodulators, GABA may act to restrain stimulation of LH release by NPY during the basal episodic and cyclic release of LH in vivo.     

Neuroendocrine regulation of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in elderly men

Leydig cell function is driven by LH, secreted in a pulsatile manner by the anterior pituitary in response to episodic discharge of hypothalamic LHRH into the pituitary portal circulation, under control of a yet to be defined neural mechanism, the "hypothalamic LHRH pulse generator". The normal aging process in elderly men is accompanied by a decline in Leydig cell function. Whereas primary testicular factors undoubtedly play an important role in the decrease of circulating (free) testosterone levels with age, recent studies demonstrated that aging also affects the central compartment of the neuroendocrine cascade. Hypothalamic alterations comprise changes in the regulation of the frequency of the LHRH pulse generator with an inappropriately low frequency relative to the prevailing androgen impregnation and opioid tone, and with an increased sensitivity to retardation of the LHRH pulse generator by androgens. As observed by some authors in basal conditions and by others after endocrine manipulations. LH pulse amplitude seems also to be reduced in elderly men as compared to young subjects. This is most probably the consequence of a reduction in the amount of LHRH released by the hypothalamus. Indeed, challenge of the gonadotropes with low, close to physiological doses of LHRH in young and elderly men reveals no alterations in pituitary responsiveness when looking at either the response for immunoreactive LH or bioactive LH. Deconvolution analysis on data obtained after low-dose LHRH suggests a markedly prolonged plasma half-life of LH in elderly men, a finding which may explain the paradoxical increase of mean LH levels in face of the reduced or unchanged frequency and amplitude of LH pulses.     

A potential code of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone-induced calcium ion responses in the regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion among individual gonadotropes

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) induces two Ca2+ responses in single gonadotropes: a Ca2+ spike/plateau or oscillation. Similar receptor-mediated Ca2+ signals have been reported in many cell types but their functional significance is obscure. Accordingly, we have determined the concentration-response properties of LHRH-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) release at the single cell level. We demonstrate a critical single cell LHRH threshold for LH release. Each gonadotrope had a particular LHRH threshold value and a range of different single cell thresholds was distributed in the gonadotrope population. The physiological significance of the threshold was demonstrated by a striking reduction (delta ED50 = 153 nM) of the LHRH threshold immediately before the preovulatory surge of LH release. The metestrous phenotype of secretion resembled a quantal process in contrast with the graded process of the proestrous phenotype. That is, the quantity of hormone secreted per metestrous gonadotrope was independent of LHRH concentration and more all-or-none than graded. The LHRH threshold and the quantal secretion process of metestrous gonadotropes was further studied by measuring cytosolic Ca2+ using fura-2 and digital imaging microscopy. We provide evidence suggesting that the Ca2+ spike/plateau and oscillation are the respective responses to subthreshold and suprathreshold concentrations of LHRH. It is proposed therefore that the Ca2+ oscillation and spike/plateau response form a binary intracellular signaling code that functions as an on-off switch. It is further proposed that this potential code unraveled here for the regulation of hormone secretion may also regulate other gonadotrope functions. Thus, while the Ca2+ spike/plateau response is strongly associated with LH release, it may be associated with reduced levels of LH-beta mRNA, and reduced numbers of LHRH receptors. Conversely, while the Ca2+ oscillation appears to be unrelated to LH release, it may be associated with increased levels of LH-beta mRNA, and increased numbers of LHRH receptors. This model may explain in molecular terms the long-standing observation that an invariant, albeit pulsatile, pattern of LHRH release is sufficient to support the preovulatory surge of LH release.     

Effect of alterations in pulsatile luteinizing hormone release on ovarian follicular atresia and steroid secretion on diestrus 1 in the rat estrous cycle

This study examined the importance of pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) release on diestrus 1 (D1; metestrus) in the rat estrous cycle to ovarian follicular development and estradiol (E2) secretion. Single injections of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist given at -7.5 h prior to the onset of a 3-h blood sampling period on D1 reduced mean blood LH levels by decreasing LH pulse amplitude, while frequency was not altered. Sequential injections at -7.5 and -3.5 h completely eliminated pulsatile LH secretion. Neither treatment altered the total number of follicles/ovary greater than 150 mu in diameter, the number of follicles in any size group between 150 and 551 mu, or plasma E2, progesterone, or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. However, both treatments with LHRH antagonist significantly increased the percentage of atretic follicles in the ovary. These data indicate that: 1) pulsatile LH release is an important factor in determining the rate at which follicles undergo atresia on D1; 2) reductions in LH pulse amplitude alone are sufficient to increase the rate of follicular atresia on D1; 3) an absence of pulsatile LH release for a period of up to 10 h on D1 is not sufficient to produce a decline in ovarian E2 secretion, most likely because the atretic process was in its early stages and had not yet affected a sufficient number of E2-secreting granulosa cells to reduce the follicle's capacity to secrete E2; and 4) suppression or elimination of pulsatile LH release on D1 is not associated with diminished FSH secretion.     

Corpus luteum development and function in cattle with episodic release of luteinizing hormone pulses inhibited in the follicular and early luteal phases of the estrous cycle.

The influence of episodic LH pulses before and subsequent to ovulation on size and function of the corpus luteum (CL) in cattle was examined. Treatments were 1) control; 2) LHRH antagonist starting 2 days before the preovulatory LH surge (Antagonist [Ant] -2); 3) LHRH antagonist at initiation of the preovulatory LH surge (Ant 0); and 4) LHRH antagonist starting 2 days after the preovulatory LH surge (Ant 2). Treatments with an LHRH antagonist were continued until 7 days after the preovulatory surge. Diameter of the CL and concentrations of progesterone were monitored during the luteal phase that ensued after treatment. Maximum average diameters of CL were 9.5, 17.5, 21.6, and 28.8 mm for females from the Ant -2, Ant 0, Ant 2, and control groups, respectively (P < 0. 01). Compared with those in control animals, concentrations of progesterone in plasma were less (P < 0.01) in animals in which release of LH pulses was inhibited by treatment with antagonist. Arbitrary units under the curve for concentrations of progesterone during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle for Ant -2, Ant 0, Ant 2, and control groups were 19.6, 41.6, 43.6, and 142.2, respectively. There was no difference in circulating concentrations of progesterone (P > 0.1) among antagonist-treated groups. In conclusion, episodic release of LH pulses before, during, and after the time of the preovulatory surge of LH may stimulate development and function of the CL in cattle.     

Some effects of epidermal growth factor on reproductive function in Merino sheep

During the i.v. infusion of a depilatory dose (100 micrograms/kg bodyweight) of mouse epidermal growth factor (EGF) into ovariectomized Merino ewes the frequency of pulsatile LH release was significantly reduced. However, the amplitude of pulses of LH secretion, either those naturally occurring or those induced by LHRH injection, was unchanged or only slightly reduced. Similar infusions of mouse EGF were made in progestagen-treated anoestrous Merino ewes in which LH secretion was maintained by injections of LHRH. These ewes did not experience oestrus or ovulate in response to PMSG injected 1 day after mouse EGF treatment (2 days before progestagen withdrawal); both responses occurred in controls. The EGF-treated ewes experienced oestrus and ovulated following progestagen-PMSG treatment 6 weeks later. These results suggest that mouse EGF inhibits the hypothalamic pulse generator responsible for LH release in the ewe but has little if any effect on pituitary sensitivity to LHRH; and mouse EGF apparently has a direct effect on the ovaries, temporarily impairing their ability to ovulate in response to exogenous gonadotrophin.     

Median eminence lesions reveal separate hypothalamic control of pulsatile follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone release

The effects of hypothalamic lesions designed to destroy either the anterior median eminence (ME) or the posterior and mid-ME on pulsatile release of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were determined in castrated male rats. In sham-operated animals, mean plasma FSH concentrations rose to peak at 10 min after the onset of sampling, whereas LH declined to a nadir during this time. In the final sample at 120 min, the mean FSH concentrations peaked as LH decreased to its minimal value. In rats with anterior ME lesions, there was suppression of LH pulses with continuing FSH pulses in 12 of 21 rats. On the other hand, in animals with posterior to mid-ME lesions, 3 out of 21 rats had elimination of FSH pulses, whereas LH pulses were maintained. Fifteen of 42 operated rats had complete ME lesions, and pulses of both hormones were abolished. The remaining 12 rats had partial ME lesions that produced a partial block of the release of both hormones. The results support the concept of separate hypothalamic control of FSH and LH release with the axons of the putative FSH-releasing factor (FSHRF) neuronal system terminating primarily in the mid- to caudal ME, whereas those of the LHRH neuronal system terminate in the anterior and mid-median eminence. We hypothesize that pulses of FSH alone are mediated by release of the FSHRF into the hypophyseal portal vessels, whereas those of LH alone are mediated by LHRH. Pulses of both gonadotropins simultaneously may be mediated by pulses of both releasing hormones simultaneously. Alternatively, relatively large pulses of LHRH alone may account for simultaneous pulses of both gonadotropins since LHRH has intrinsic FSH-releasing activity.     

Effects of Superior Cervical Ganglionectomy and Melatonin Replacement on Intra-hypothalamic LHRH Content and Pulsatile Luteinizing Hormone Release in the Mink

Long-term effects of subcutaneous melatonin implants on intrahypothalamic LHRH content and on pulsatile luteinizing hormone release have been investigated in ganglionectomized male mink. Animals were submitted to bilateral removal of the superior cervical ganglion in mid-April. A preliminary study revealed that plasma LH concentrations remain at a basal level throughout the year following ganglionectomy. In a second experiment, one month after ganglionectomy and transfer from the natural photoperiod environment to short daylengths (LD 4:20), melatonin pellets were subcutaneously implanted to overcome deafferentation of the pineal. Progressive effects of treatment were studied 7 days, 15 days, and one, two and three months after insertion of the melatonin implants. The intra-hypothalamic LHRH content in ganglionectomized mink was at a basal level similar to that observed during seasonally sexual quiescence, or after exposure to inhibitory long days (LD 20:4). A significant and transient elevation in LHRH content was observed already after fifteen days, and also one month after insertion of melatonin implants. This resulted in mean values similar to those observed during the breeding season, or after exposure to stimulatory short days (LD 4:20). A decrease in hypothalamic LHRH content started after two months. No pattern of pulsatile LH secretion was recorded in ganglionectomized untreated mink. A significant increase in all parameters of pulsatile LH secretion was observed fifteen days after the elevation of LHRH content induced by melatonin treatment, and maximum values were reached after two months. Pituitary activity tended to decrease after three months, characterized in particular by a significant decrease in the mean frequency of LH pulses. In addition, the increase in pulsatile characteristics of LH release occurred two months before the peripheral renewal of testicular activity. Apparently, the reproductive endocrine function in ganglionectomized mink treated with melatonin implants is restored more rapidly at the hypothalamic level than at the pituitary or testicular levels.     

Effects of Superior Cervical Ganglionectomy and Melatonin Replacement on Intra-hypothalamic LHRH Content and Pulsatile Luteinizing Hormone Release in the Mink

Long-term effects of subcutaneous melatonin implants on intrahypothalamic LHRH content and on pulsatile luteinizing hormone release have been investigated in ganglionectomized male mink. Animals were submitted to bilateral removal of the superior cervical ganglion in mid-April. A preliminary study revealed that plasma LH concentrations remain at a basal level throughout the year following ganglionectomy. In a second experiment, one month after ganglionectomy and transfer from the natural photoperiod environment to short daylengths (LD 4:20), melatonin pellets were subcutaneously implanted to overcome deafferentation of the pineal. Progressive effects of treatment were studied 7 days, 15 days, and one, two and three months after insertion of the melatonin implants. The intra-hypothalamic LHRH content in ganglionectomized mink was at a basal level similar to that observed during seasonally sexual quiescence, or after exposure to inhibitory long days (LD 20:4). A significant and transient elevation in LHRH content was observed already after fifteen days, and also one month after insertion of melatonin implants. This resulted in mean values similar to those observed during the breeding season, or after exposure to stimulatory short days (LD 4:20). A decrease in hypothalamic LHRH content started after two months. No pattern of pulsatile LH secretion was recorded in ganglionectomized untreated mink. A significant increase in all parameters of pulsatile LH secretion was observed fifteen days after the elevation of LHRH content induced by melatonin treatment, and maximum values were reached after two months. Pituitary activity tended to decrease after three months, characterized in particular by a significant decrease in the mean frequency of LH pulses. In addition, the increase in pulsatile characteristics of LH release occurred two months before the peripheral renewal of testicular activity. Apparently, the reproductive endocrine function in ganglionectomized mink treated with melatonin implants is restored more rapidly at the hypothalamic level than at the pituitary or testicular levels.     

Interactions between neuropeptide Y, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and estradiol in the control of luteinizing hormone release from cultured ovine pituitary cells

This study used pituitary cells in culture firstly to test the hypothesis that NPY may augment the pituitary LH response to LHRH and secondly to determine whether this interaction is dependent on the presence of estradiol. LHRH (10(-10)-10(-6) M) caused a significant increase in LH secretion from dispersed ovine pituitary cells maintained in culture for six days, a response which was enhanced when cells were pretreated for three days with 4 x 10(-11) M estradiol. NPY 10(-10)-10(-6) M) had no effect on basal LH release from ovine pituitary cells maintained either in the presence or absence of estradiol. NPY (10(-10) and 10(-8) M) also had no effect on LHRH-stimulated LH release either in the presence or absence of estradiol. These results substantiate previous observations that physiologically relevant concentrations of estradiol enhance the LH response to LHRH in cultured ovine pituitary cells. However, in contrast to experiments carried out using rat pituitary cells in culture, the present data provide no evidence to support the hypothesis that NPY alone interacts with LHRH in the control of LH secretion from the ovine pituitary gland.