Effects of aesthetic abdominoplasty on abdominal wall perfusion: a quantitative evaluation

Abdominoplasty procedures involve a high risk of early complications, including hematomas, seromas, necrosis, and wound-healing problems. Their rationale is evident from the vascular anatomy of the abdominal wall, as traditional abdominoplasty includes a division of the main perforating vessels. No studies exist to quantitatively assess the consequences of abdominoplasty on the perfusion of the random pattern abdominal flap. To address this issue and quantify the influence of classic abdominoplasty on the perfusion of the abdominal skin, the authors performed a prospective clinical trial including 15 low-risk patients undergoing abdominoplasty for aesthetic purposes. Perfusion of the abdominal flap was measured intraoperatively using the technique of dynamic laser-fluorescence-videoangiography. In the region between the umbilicus and the transverse scar (zone 1), the increment of fluorescence (the slope of the intensity curve during inflow of the indocyanine green) was recorded and compared with the intensity curve of normal tissue that was not involved in surgery (thoracic wall). The results of the intraoperative indocyanine green perfusography showed a significant impairment of the vascular supply of zone 1 in all patients. The mean perfusion index in this region was 17.2 percent (range, 5 to 32 percent) of the perfusion of the surrounding skin that was not involved in surgery. The complication rate was 33 percent (five patients) and included two cases of hematoma and three cases of scar dehiscence with skin and/or fat necrosis. These data indicate that conventional abdominoplasty including extended undermining and division of the superficial and the deep arterial systems causes profound devascularization of the abdominal flap. This might explain the high incidence of complications following this procedure.     

Antibiotic use in aesthetic surgery: a national survey and literature review

Although much has been written regarding the use of antibiotics in surgery, no clear guidelines exist in the literature regarding the use of antibiotics in aesthetic surgery. To determine the pattern of antibiotic use in aesthetic surgery, a comprehensive survey was mailed to 6000 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons members and candidates. A total of 1767 completed responses were returned, which represents a response rate of 30 percent. The type, route, and duration of antibiotic administration are reported for 10 common cosmetic surgical procedures. The results of the survey confirmed that there is widespread use of antibiotics in aesthetic surgery. To provide guidelines for proper antibiotic use, the current literature was extensively reviewed. The authors found little or no correlation between reported clinical practice and the literature. It is hoped that this study will stimulate further investigation into this area of aesthetic surgery.     

Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature

Outcomes research examines the end results of medical interventions, taking into account patients' experiences, preferences, and values. The purpose of assessing outcomes is to provide evidence on which to base clinical decisions. The assessment of outcomes in aesthetic surgery is especially pertinent because patient satisfaction is the predominant factor in determining success. In cosmetic surgery, various scales have been used to assess outcomes. Unfortunately, none of these methods has achieved widespread use. The adoption of broadly accepted, relevant scales to measure outcomes would be advantageous, because this would allow the comparison of techniques, quantification of positive effects, and identification of patients unlikely to benefit from surgery. The purpose of this study was to critically review the present literature to identify the appropriate instruments to assess outcomes in aesthetic surgery. After a comprehensive review of aesthetic surgery outcome instruments, the authors identified body-image and quality-of-life measures to be of the greatest value in determining aesthetic surgery outcomes. These conclusions were based on a critical evaluation of the feasibility, validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of these measures. The Multidimensional Body-States Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ), a psychological assessment of body image, was selected as a potential candidate for further study. Two additional body-image assessment instruments, the Facial Appearance Sorting Test (FAST) and the Breast Chest Ratings Scale (BCRS), may be useful in the assessment of rhinoplasty and breast surgery, respectively. The Derriford Scale (DAS59), an instrument that assesses appearance-related quality of life, was also selected. In addition, the authors recommend the use of a generic, utility-based quality-of-life instrument, such as the Health Utilities Index (HUI) or the EuroQol (EQ-5D).     

Achieving standardized photographs in aesthetic surgery

The plastic surgeon who wishes to share clinical experience with colleagues is obligated to produce accurate data in the form of photographs. Moreover, accurate photographs are essential to enable an objective critical appraisal of one's own surgical skill and to display postoperative results to patients in an unbiased fashion. Change should not be a function of either the photograph or the photographer. The use of an acetate screen grid in conjunction with anatomic boundaries is described as a means to achieve accurate, reproducible standard photographs of the face and body in aesthetic surgical patients.     

FRET or no FRET: a quantitative comparison

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a technique used to measure the interaction between two molecules labeled with two different fluorophores (the donor and the acceptor) by the transfer of energy from the excited donor to the acceptor. In biological applications, this technique has become popular to qualitatively map protein-protein interactions, and in biophysical projects it is used as a quantitative measure for distances between a single donor and acceptor molecule. Numerous approaches can be found in the literature to quantify and map FRET, but the measures they provide are often difficult to interpret. We propose here a quantitative comparison of these methods by using a surface FRET system with controlled amounts of donor and acceptor fluorophores and controlled distances between them. We support the system with a Monte Carlo simulation of FRET, which provides reference values for the FRET efficiency under various experimental conditions. We validate a representative set of FRET efficiencies and indices calculated from the different methods with different experimental settings. Finally, we test their sensitivity and draw conclusions for the preparation of FRET experiments in more complex and less-controlled systems.     

Pulse oximeter in the ambulatory aesthetic surgical facility

One-hundred consecutive patients undergoing aesthetic surgical procedures with adjunctive intravenous sedation in an office-based ambulatory surgical facility were monitored by an anesthesiologist with an ECG, stethoscope, automatic sphygmomanometer, and pulse oximeter. The pulse oximeter detected hypoxemia occurring intraoperatively and in the recovery room earlier than the traditional methods of monitoring. By detecting early drops in the SAO2 with the pulse oximeter, appropriate corrective measures could be instituted and titration of intravenous anesthetics adjusted, avoiding progression to more profound hypoxemia and thus resulting in the safer delivery of anesthesia. The pulse oximeter is a useful and recommended adjunct to the traditional methods of monitoring in an office-based ambulatory surgical facility.