Homomeric ring assemblies of eukaryotic Sm proteins have affinity for both RNA and DNA. Crystal structure of an oligomeric complex of yeast SmF

Sm and Sm-like proteins are key components of small ribonucleoproteins involved in many RNA and DNA processing pathways. In eukaryotes, these complexes contain seven unique Sm or Sm-like (Lsm) proteins assembled as hetero-heptameric rings, whereas in Archaea and bacteria six or seven-membered rings are made from only a single polypeptide chain. Here we show that single Sm and Lsm proteins from yeast also have the capacity to assemble into homo-oligomeric rings. Formation of homo-oligomers by the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein components SmE and SmF preclude hetero-interactions vital to formation of functional small nuclear RNP complexes in vivo. To better understand these unusual complexes, we have determined the crystal structure of the homomeric assembly of the spliceosomal protein SmF. Like its archaeal/bacterial homologs, the SmF complex forms a homomeric ring but in an entirely novel arrangement whereby two heptameric rings form a co-axially stacked dimer via interactions mediated by the variable loops of the individual SmF protein chains. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the homomeric assemblies of yeast Sm and Lsm proteins are capable of binding not only to oligo(U) RNA but, in the case of SmF, also to oligo(dT) single-stranded DNA.     

The Gemin5 protein of the SMN complex identifies snRNAs

The survival of motor neurons protein (SMN) is part of a large complex that contains six other proteins, Gemins2-7. The SMN complex assembles the heptameric Sm protein core on small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and plays a critical role in the biogenesis of snRNPs, the major and essential components of mRNA splicing in eukaryotes. For its function, the SMN complex binds Sm proteins and snRNAs, which it distinguishes from other RNAs by specific features they contain. We show here that Gemin5, a 170 kDa WD-repeat protein, is the snRNA binding protein of the SMN complex. Gemin5 binds directly and specifically to the unique features, including the Sm site, of snRNAs. Reduction of Gemin5 results in reduced capacity of the SMN complex to bind snRNAs and to assemble Sm cores. Gemin5 therefore functions as the factor that allows the SMN complex to distinguish snRNAs from other cellular RNAs for snRNP biogenesis.     

Archaeal Sm proteins form heptameric and hexameric complexes: crystal structures of the Sm1 and Sm2 proteins from the hyperthermophile Archaeoglobus fulgidus

Proteins of largely unknown function related to the Sm proteins present in the core domain of eukaryotic small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles have recently been detected in Archaea. In contrast to eukaryotes, Archaea contain maximally two distinct Sm-related proteins belonging to different subfamilies, we refer to as Sm1 and Sm2. Here we report the crystal structures of the Sm1- and Sm2-type proteins from the hyperthermophilic euryarchaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus (AF-Sm1 and AF-Sm2) at a resolution of 2.5 and 1.95 A, respectively. While the AF-Sm1 protein forms a heptameric ring structure similar to that found in other archaeal Sm1-type proteins, the AF-Sm2 protein unexpectedly forms a homo-hexamer in the crystals, and, as is evident from the mass spectrometric analysis, also in solution. Both proteins have essentially the same monomer fold and inter-subunit beta-sheet hydrogen bonding giving rise to a similar overall architecture of the doughnut-shaped six and seven-membered rings. In addition, a conserved uracil-binding pocket identified previously in an AF-Sm1/RNA complex, suggests a common RNA-binding mode for the AF-Sm1 and AF-Sm2 proteins, in line with solution studies showing preferential binding to U-rich oligonucleotides for both proteins. Clear differences are however seen in the charge distribution within the two structures. The rough faces of the rings, i.e. the faces not containing the base binding pockets, have opposite charges in the two structures, being predominantly positive in AF-Sm1 and negative in AF-Sm2. Differences in the ionic interactions between subunits provide an explanation for the distinctly different oligomerisation behaviour of the AF-Sm1 and AF-Sm2 proteins and of Sm1- and Sm2-type proteins in general, as well as the stability of their complexes. Implications for the functions of archaeal Sm proteins are being discussed.     

The structure of mammalian small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. Identification of multiple protein components reactive with anti-(U1)ribonucleoprotein and anti-Sm autoantibodies

The Sm small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) from mammalian cells have been characterized as containing U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 RNA associated with some subset of at least 10 distinct polypeptides (called 68K, A, A', B, B', C, D, E, F, and G) that range in molecular weight from 68,000 to 11,000. Whereas this entire collection of snRNP particles is precipitated by patient anti-Sm autoantibodies, anti-(U1)RNP autoantibodies specifically recognize U1 snRNPs. Here, we have performed immunoblots using the sera from 29 patients and a mouse anti-Sm monoclonal antibody to identify which HeLa cell snRNP proteins carry anti-Sm or anti-(U1)RNP antigenic determinants. Strikingly, every serum surveyed, as well as the monoclonal antibody, recognizes determinants on two or more snRNP protein components. The three proteins, 68K, A, and C, that uniquely fractionate with U1 snRNPs are specifically reactive with anti-(U1)RNP sera in blots. Anti-Sm patient sera and the mouse monoclonal antibody react with proteins B, B', D, and sometimes E, one or more of which must be present on all Sm snRNPs. The blot results combined with data obtained from a refined 32P-labeled RNA immunoprecipitation assay reveal that, in our collection of the sera from 29 patients, anti-Sm rarely exists in the absence of equal or higher titers of anti-(U1)RNP; moreover, (U1)RNP sera often contain detectable levels of anti-Sm. Our findings further define the protein composition of the Sm snRNPs and raise intriguing questions concerning the relatedness of snRNP polypeptides and the mechanism of autoantibody induction.     

Purification of the spliced leader ribonucleoprotein particle from Leptomonas collosoma revealed the existence of an Sm protein in trypanosomes. Cloning the SmE homologue

Trans-splicing in trypanosomes involves the addition of a common spliced leader (SL) sequence, which is derived from a small RNA, the SL RNA, to all mRNA precursors. The SL RNA is present in the cell in the form of a ribonucleoprotein, the SL RNP. Using conventional chromatography and affinity selection with 2'-O-methylated RNA oligonucleotides at high ionic strength, five proteins of 70, 16, 13, 12, and 8 kDa were co-selected with the SL RNA from Leptomonas collosoma, representing the SL RNP core particle. Under conditions of lower ionic strength, additional proteins of 28 and 20 kDa were revealed. On the basis of peptide sequences, the gene coding for a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 11.9 kDa was cloned and identified as homologue of the cis-spliceosomal SmE. The protein carries the Sm motifs 1 and 2 characteristic of Sm antigens that bind to all known cis-spliceosomal uridylic acid-rich small nuclear RNAs (U snRNAs), suggesting the existence of Sm proteins in trypanosomes. This finding is of special interest because trypanosome snRNPs are the only snRNPs examined to date that are not recognized by anti-Sm antibodies. Because of the early divergence of trypanosomes from the eukaryotic lineage, the trypanosome SmE protein represents one of the primordial Sm proteins in nature.     

LSm proteins form heptameric rings that bind to RNA via repeating motifs

Members of the LSm family of proteins share the Sm fold--a closed barrel comprising five anti-parallel beta strands with an alpha helix stacked on the top. The fold forms a subunit of hexameric or heptameric rings of approximately 7nm in diameter. Interactions between neighboring subunits center on an anti-parallel interaction of the fourth and fifth beta strands. In the lumen of the ring, the subunits have the same spacing as nucleotides in RNA, enabling the rings to bind to single-stranded RNA via a repeating motif. Eubacteria and archaea build homohexamers and homoheptamers, respectively, whereas eukaryotes use >18 LSm paralogs to build at least six different heteroheptameric rings. The four different rings in the nucleus that permanently bind small nuclear RNAs and function in pre-mRNA maturation are called Sm rings. The two different rings that transiently bind to RNAs and, thereby, assist in the degradation of mRNA in the cytoplasm and the maturation of a wide spectrum of RNAs in the nucleus are called LSm rings.     

Sm core variation in spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins from Trypanosoma brucei

Messenger RNA processing in trypanosomes by cis and trans splicing requires spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4/U6, and U5, as well as the spliced leader (SL) RNP. As in other eukaryotes, these RNPs share a core structure of seven Sm polypeptides. Here, we report that the identity of the Sm protein constituents varies between spliceosomal snRNPs: specifically, two of the canonical Sm proteins, SmB and SmD3, are replaced in the U2 snRNP by two novel, U2 snRNP-specific Sm proteins, Sm15K and Sm16.5K. We present a model for the variant Sm core in the U2 snRNP, based on tandem affinity purification-tagging and in vitro protein-protein interaction assays. Using in vitro reconstitutions with canonical and U2-specific Sm cores, we show that the exchange of two Sm subunits determines discrimination between individual Sm sites. In sum, we have demonstrated that the heteroheptameric Sm core structure varies between spliceosomal snRNPs, and that modulation of the Sm core composition mediates the recognition of small nuclear RNA-specific Sm sites.     

Evolutionary conservation of the U7 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein in Drosophila melanogaster

The U7 snRNP involved in histone RNA 3' end processing is related to but biochemically distinct from spliceosomal snRNPs. In vertebrates, the Sm core structure assembling around the noncanonical Sm-binding sequence of U7 snRNA contains only five of the seven standard Sm proteins. The missing Sm D1 and D2 subunits are replaced by U7-specific Sm-like proteins Lsm10 and Lsm11, at least the latter of which is important for histone RNA processing. So far, it was unknown if this special U7 snRNP composition is conserved in invertebrates. Here we describe several putative invertebrate Lsm10 and Lsm11 orthologs that display low but clear sequence similarity to their vertebrate counterparts. Immunoprecipitation studies in Drosophila S2 cells indicate that the Drosophila Lsm10 and Lsm11 orthologs (dLsm10 and dLsm11) associate with each other and with Sm B, but not with Sm D1 and D2. Moreover, dLsm11 associates with the recently characterized Drosophila U7 snRNA and, indirectly, with histone H3 pre-mRNA. Furthermore, dLsm10 and dLsm11 can assemble into U7 snRNPs in mammalian cells. These experiments demonstrate a strong evolutionary conservation of the unique U7 snRNP composition, despite a high degree of primary sequence divergence of its constituents. Therefore, Drosophila appears to be a suitable system for further genetic studies of the cell biology of U7 snRNPs.     

Crystal structure of Lsm3 octamer from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for Lsm ring organisation and recruitment

Sm and Sm-like (Lsm) proteins are core components of the ribonucleoprotein complexes essential to key nucleic acid processing events within the eukaryotic cell. They assemble as polyprotein ring scaffolds that have the capacity to bind RNA substrates and other necessary protein factors. The crystal structure of yeast Lsm3 reveals a new organisation of the L/Sm β-propeller ring, containing eight protein subunits. Little distortion of the characteristic L/Sm fold is required to form the octamer, indicating that the eukaryotic Lsm ring may be more pliable than previously thought. The homomeric Lsm3 octamer is found to successfully recruit Lsm6, Lsm2 and Lsm5 directly from yeast lysate. Our crystal structure shows the C-terminal tail of each Lsm3 subunit to be engaged in connections across rings through specific β-sheet interactions with elongated loops protruding from neighbouring octamers. While these loops are of distinct length for each Lsm protein and generally comprise low-complexity polar sequences, several Lsm C-termini comprise hydrophobic sequences suitable for β-sheet interactions. The Lsm3 structure thus provides evidence for protein-protein interactions likely utilised by the highly variable Lsm loops and termini in the recruitment of RNA processing factors to mixed Lsm ring scaffolds. Our coordinates also provide updated homology models for the active Lsm[1-7] and Lsm[2-8] heptameric rings.     

Gemin8 is required for the architecture and function of the survival motor neuron complex

The biogenesis of spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) in higher eukaryotes requires the functions of several cellular proteins and includes nuclear as well as cytoplasmic phases. In the cytoplasm, a macromolecular complex containing the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, Gemin2-8 and Unrip mediates the ATP-dependent assembly of Sm proteins and snRNAs into snRNPs. To carry out snRNP assembly, the SMN complex binds directly to both Sm proteins and snRNAs; however, the contribution of the individual components of the SMN complex to its composition, interactions, and function is poorly characterized. Here, we have investigated the functional role of Gemin8 using novel monoclonal antibodies against components of the SMN complex and RNA interference experiments. We show that Gemin6, Gemin7, and Unrip form a stable cytoplasmic complex whose association with SMN requires Gemin8. Gemin8 binds directly to SMN and mediates its interaction with the Gemin6/Gemin7 heterodimer. Importantly, loss of Gemin6, Gemin7, and Unrip interaction with SMN as a result of Gemin8 knockdown affects snRNP assembly by impairing the SMN complex association with Sm proteins but not with snRNAs. These results reveal the essential role of Gemin8 for the proper structural organization of the SMN complex and the involvement of the heteromeric subunit containing Gemin6, Gemin7, Gemin8, and Unrip in the recruitment of Sm proteins to the snRNP assembly pathway.     

Specific sequence features, recognized by the SMN complex, identify snRNAs and determine their fate as snRNPs

The survival of motor neurons (SMN) complex is essential for the biogenesis of spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) as it binds to and delivers Sm proteins for assembly of Sm cores on the abundant small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). Using the conserved snRNAs encoded by the lymphotropic Herpesvirus saimiri (HVS), we determined the specific sequence and structural features of RNAs for binding to the SMN complex and for Sm core assembly. We show that the minimal SMN complex-binding domain in snRNAs, except U1, is comprised of an Sm site (AUUUUUG) and an adjacent 3' stem-loop. The adenosine and the first and third uridines of the Sm site are particularly critical for binding of the SMN complex, which directly contacts the backbone phosphates of these uridines. The specific sequence of the adjacent stem (7 to 12 base pairs)-loop (4 to 17 nucleotides) is not important for SMN complex binding, but it must be located within a short distance of the 3' end of the RNA for an Sm core to assemble. Importantly, these defining characteristics are discerned by the SMN complex and not by the Sm proteins, which can bind to and assemble on an Sm site sequence alone. These findings demonstrate that the SMN complex is the identifier, as well as assembler, of the abundant class of snRNAs in cells because it is able to recognize an snRNP code that they contain.     

Peri-implantation lethality in mice lacking the Sm motif-containing protein Lsm4

Small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) are particles present only in eukaryotic cells. They are involved in a large variety of RNA maturation processes, most notably in pre-mRNA splicing. Several of the proteins typically found in snRNPs contain a sequence signature, the Sm domain, conserved from yeast to mammals. By using a promoter trap strategy to target actively transcribed loci in murine embryonic stem cells, a new murine gene encoding an Sm motif-containing protein was identified. Database searches revealed that it is the mouse orthologue of Lsm4p, a protein found in yeast and human cells and putatively associated with U6 snRNA. Introduction of the geo reporter gene cassette under the control of the murine Lsm4 (mLsm4) endogenous promoter showed that the gene was ubiquitously transcribed in embryonic and adult tissues. The insertion of the geo cassette disrupted the mLsm4 allele, and homozygosity for the mutation led to a recessive embryonic lethal phenotype. mLsm4-null zygotes survived to the blastocyst stages, implanted into the uterus, but died shortly thereafter. The early death of mLsm4p-null mice suggests that the role of mLsm4p in splicing is essential and cannot be compensated by other Lsm proteins.     

Why do cells need an assembly machine for RNA-protein complexes?

Small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) are crucial for pre-mRNA processing to mRNAs. Each snRNP contains a small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and an extremely stable core of seven Sm proteins. The snRNP biogenesis pathway is complex, involving nuclear export of snRNA, Sm-core assembly in the cytoplasm and re-import of the mature snRNP. Although in vitro Sm cores assemble readily on uridine-rich RNAs, the assembly in cells is carried out by the survival of motor neurons (SMN) complex. The SMN complex stringently scrutinizes RNAs for specific features that define them as snRNAs and identifies the RNA-binding Sm proteins. We discuss how this surveillance capacity of the SMN complex might ensure assembly of Sm cores only on the correct RNAs and prevent illicit, potentially deleterious assembly of Sm cores on random RNAs.     

snRNP Sm proteins share two evolutionarily conserved sequence motifs which are involved in Sm protein-protein interactions.

The spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4/U6 and U5 share eight proteins B', B, D1, D2, D3, E, F and G which form the structural core of the snRNPs. This class of common proteins plays an essential role in the biogenesis of the snRNPs. In addition, these proteins represent the major targets for the so-called anti-Sm auto-antibodies which are diagnostic for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We have characterized the proteins F and G from HeLa cells by cDNA cloning, and, thus, all human Sm protein sequences are now available for comparison. Similar to the D, B/B' and E proteins, the F and G proteins do not possess any of the known RNA binding motifs, suggesting that other types of RNA-protein interactions occur in the snRNP core. Strikingly, the eight human Sm proteins possess mutual homology in two regions, 32 and 14 amino acids long, that we term Sm motifs 1 and 2. The Sm motifs are evolutionarily highly conserved in all of the putative homologues of the human Sm proteins identified in the data base. These results suggest that the Sm proteins may have arisen from a single common ancestor. Several hypothetical proteins, mainly of plant origin, that clearly contain the conserved Sm motifs but exhibit only comparatively low overall homology to one of the human Sm proteins, were identified in the data base. This suggests that the Sm motifs may also be shared by non-spliceosomal proteins. Further, we provide experimental evidence that the Sm motifs are involved, at least in part, in Sm protein-protein interactions. Specifically, we show by co-immunoprecipitation analyses of in vitro translated B' and D3 that the Sm motifs are essential for complex formation between B' and D3. Our finding that the Sm proteins share conserved sequence motifs may help to explain the frequent occurrence in patient sera of anti-Sm antibodies that cross-react with multiple Sm proteins and may ultimately further our understanding of how the snRNPs act as auto-antigens and immunogens in SLE.     

Sm and Sm-like proteins assemble in two related complexes of deep evolutionary origin.

A group of seven Sm proteins forms a complex that binds to several RNAs in metazoans. All Sm proteins contain a sequence signature, the Sm domain, also found in two yeast Sm-like proteins associated with the U6 snRNA. We have performed database searches revealing the presence of 16 proteins carrying an Sm domain in the yeast genome. Analysis of this protein family confirmed that seven of its members, encoded by essential genes, are homologues of metazoan Sm proteins. Immunoprecipitation revealed that an evolutionarily related subgroup of seven Sm-like proteins is directly associated with the nuclear U6 and pre-RNase P RNAs. The corresponding genes are essential or required for normal vegetative growth. These proteins appear functionally important to stabilize U6 snRNA. The two last yeast Sm-like proteins were not found associated with RNA, and neither was essential for vegetative growth. To investigate whether U6-associated Sm-like protein function is widespread, we cloned several cDNAs encoding homologous human proteins. Two representative human proteins were shown to associate with U6 snRNA-containing complexes. We also identified archaeal proteins related to Sm and Sm-like proteins. Our results demonstrate that Sm and Sm-like proteins assemble in at least two functionally conserved complexes of deep evolutionary origin.     

pICln Inhibits snRNP Biogenesis by Binding Core Spliceosomal Proteins

The U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) form essential components of spliceosomes, the machinery that removes introns from pre-mRNAs in eukaryotic cells. A critical initial step in the complex process of snRNP biogenesis is the assembly of a group of common core proteins (Sm proteins) on spliceosomal snRNA. In this study we show by multiple independent methods that the protein pICln associates with Sm proteins in vivo and in vitro. The binding of pICln to Sm proteins interferes with Sm protein assembly on spliceosomal snRNAs and inhibits import of snRNAs into the nucleus. Furthermore, pICln prevents the interaction of Sm proteins with the survival of motor neurons (SMN) protein, an interaction that has been shown to be critical for snRNP biogenesis. These findings lead us to propose a model in which pICln participates in the regulation of snRNP biogenesis, at least in part by interfering with Sm protein interaction with SMN protein.     

Lymphotropic Herpesvirus saimiri uses the SMN complex to assemble Sm cores on its small RNAs

The lymphotropic Herpesvirus saimiri (HVS) causes acute leukemia, T-cell lymphoma, and death in New World monkeys. HVS encodes seven small RNAs (HSURs) of unknown function. The HSURs acquire host Sm proteins and assemble Sm cores similar to those found on the spliceosomal small nuclear RNPs (snRNPs). Here we show that, like host snRNPs, HSURs use the SMN (survival of motor neurons) complex to assemble Sm cores. The HSURs bind the SMN complex directly and with very high affinity, similar to or higher than that of host snRNAs, and can outcompete host snRNAs for SMN-dependent assembly into RNPs. These observations highlight the general utility of the SMN complex for RNP assembly and suggest that infectious agents that engage the SMN complex may burden SMN-dependent pathways, possibly leading to a deleterious reduction in available SMN complex for essential host functions.     

Potential coexistence of both bacterial and eukaryotic small RNA biogenesis and functional related protein homologs in Archaea

RNA silencing plays crucial roles in both bacteria and eukaryotes, yet its machinery appears to differ in these two kingdoms. A couple of Argonaute protein homologs have been reported in some archaeal species in recent years. As Argonaute protein is the key component of eukaryotic RNA silencing pathways, such findings suggested the possibility of existence of eukaryotic RNA silencing like pathways in Archaea, which present the life forms between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. To further explore such hypothesis, we systematically screened 71 fully sequenced archaeal genomes, and identified some proteins containing homologous regions to the functional domains of eukaryotie RNA silencing pathway key proteins. The phylogenetic relationships of these proteins were analyzed. The conserved time-tional amino acids between archaeal and eukaryotic Piwi domains suggested their functional similarity. Our results provide new clues to the evolution of RNA silencing pathways.