High-throughput yeast two-hybrid assays for large-scale protein interaction mapping

Protein-protein interactions play fundamental roles in many biological processes. Hence, protein interaction mapping is becoming a well-established functional genomics approach to generate functional annotations for predicted proteins that so far have remained uncharacterized. The yeast two-hybrid system is currently one of the most standardized protein interaction mapping techniques. Here, we describe the protocols for a semiautomated, high-throughput, Gal4-based yeast two-hybrid system.     

Bioinformatics analysis of protein interaction networks: Statistics, topologies, and meeting the standards of experimental biologists

In recent years, bioinformatics analyses of protein networks have allowed researchers to obtain exceptional theoretical predictions and subsequent experimental confirmations. The current view is that protein networks are scale-free networks and have a topology analogous to that of transport networks, the Internet, and social networks. However, an alternative hypothesis exists in which protein networks and scale-free networks possess significantly different properties. In this work, we show that existing information is insufficient to describe protein networks as scale-free networks.     

Comparative analysis of protein interaction networks

Recent advances in proteomics and computational biology have lead to a flood of protein interaction data and resulting interaction networks (e.g. (Gavin et al., 2002)). Here I first analyse the status and quality of parts lists (genes and proteins), then comparatively assess large-scale protein interaction data (von Mering et al., 2002) and finally try to identify biological meaningful units (e.g. pathways, cellular processes) within interaction networks that are derived from the conservation of gene neighborhood (Snel et al., 2002). Possible extensions of gene neighborhood analysis to eukaryotes (von Mering and Bork, 2002) will be discussed.     

Modular organization of protein interaction networks

Bioinformatics (2007) 23(2),     

Modular organization of protein interaction networks

MOTIVATION: Accumulating evidence suggests that biological systems are composed of interacting, separable, functional modules. Identifying these modules is essential to understand the organization of biological systems. RESULT: In this paper, we present a framework to identify modules within biological networks. In this approach, the concept of degree is extended from the single vertex to the sub-graph, and a formal definition of module in a network is used. A new agglomerative algorithm was developed to identify modules from the network by combining the new module definition with the relative edge order generated by the Girvan-Newman (G-N) algorithm. A JAVA program, MoNet, was developed to implement the algorithm. Applying MoNet to the yeast core protein interaction network from the database of interacting proteins (DIP) identified 86 simple modules with sizes larger than three proteins. The modules obtained are significantly enriched in proteins with related biological process Gene Ontology terms. A comparison between the MoNet modules and modules defined by Radicchi et al. (2004) indicates that MoNet modules show stronger co-clustering of related genes and are more robust to ties in betweenness values. Further, the MoNet output retains the adjacent relationships between modules and allows the construction of an interaction web of modules providing insight regarding the relationships between different functional modules. Thus, MoNet provides an objective approach to understand the organization and interactions of biological processes in cellular systems. AVAILABILITY: MoNet is available upon request from the authors.     

Bioinformatics of large-scale protein interaction networks

We survey recent techniques for construction and prediction of large-scale protein interaction networks, focusing on computational processing steps. Special emphasis is placed on critical assessment of data completeness and reliability of the various approaches. Once built, protein interaction networks can be used for functional annotation or to generate higher-level biological hypotheses on pathways.     

Identification of protein complexes from multi-relationship protein interaction networks

Background

Protein complexes play an important role in biological processes. Recent developments in experiments have resulted in the publication of many high-quality, large-scale protein-protein interaction (PPI) datasets, which provide abundant data for computational approaches to the prediction of protein complexes. However, the precision of protein complex prediction still needs to be improved due to the incompletion and noise in PPI networks.

Results

There exist complex and diverse relationships among proteins after integrating multiple sources of biological information. Considering that the influences of different types of interactions are not the same weight for protein complex prediction, we construct a multi-relationship protein interaction network (MPIN) by integrating PPI network topology with gene ontology annotation information. Then, we design a novel algorithm named MINE (identifying protein complexes based on Multi-relationship protein Interaction NEtwork) to predict protein complexes with high cohesion and low coupling from MPIN.

Conclusions

The experiments on yeast data show that MINE outperforms the current methods in terms of both accuracy and statistical significance.

     

Improving evolutionary models of protein interaction networks

MOTIVATION: Theoretical models of biological networks are valuable tools in evolutionary inference. Theoretical models based on gene duplication and divergence provide biologically plausible evolutionary mechanics. Similarities found between empirical networks and their theoretically generated counterpart are considered evidence of the role modeled mechanics play in biological evolution. However, the method by which these models are parameterized can lead to questions about the validity of the inferences. Selecting parameter values in order to produce a particular topological value obfuscates the possibility that the model may produce a similar topology for a large range of parameter values. Alternately, a model may produce a large range of topologies, allowing (incorrect) parameter values to produce a valid topology from an otherwise flawed model. In order to lend biological credence to the modeled evolutionary mechanics, parameter values should be derived from the empirical data. Furthermore, recent work indicates that the timing and fate of gene duplications are critical to proper derivation of these parameters. RESULTS: We present a methodology for deriving evolutionary rates from empirical data that is used to parameterize duplication and divergence models of protein interaction network evolution. Our method avoids shortcomings of previous methods, which failed to consider the effect of subsequent duplications. From our parameter values, we find that concurrent and existing existing duplication and divergence models are insufficient for modeling protein interaction network evolution. We introduce a model enhancement based on heritable interaction sites on the surface of a protein and find that it more closely reflects the high clustering found in the empirical network.     

Unraveling protein interaction networks with near-optimal efficiency

The functional characterization of genes and their gene products is the main challenge of the genomic era. Examining interaction information for every gene product is a direct way to assemble the jigsaw puzzle of proteins into a functional map. Here we demonstrate a method in which the information gained from pull-down experiments, in which single proteins act as baits to detect interactions with other proteins, is maximized by using a network-based strategy to select the baits. Because of the scale-free distribution of protein interaction networks, we were able to obtain fast coverage by focusing on highly connected nodes (hubs) first. Unfortunately, locating hubs requires prior global information about the network one is trying to unravel. Here, we present an optimized 'pay-as-you-go' strategy that identifies highly connected nodes using only local information that is collected as successive pull-down experiments are performed. Using this strategy, we estimate that 90% of the human interactome can be covered by 10,000 pull-down experiments, with 50% of the interactions confirmed by reciprocal pull-down experiments.     

Antagonism and bistability in protein interaction networks

A protein interaction network (PIN) is a set of proteins that modulate one another's activities by regulated synthesis and degradation, by reversible binding to form complexes, and by catalytic reactions (e.g., phosphorylation and dephosphorylation). Most PINs are so complex that their dynamical characteristics cannot be deduced accurately by intuitive reasoning alone. To predict the properties of such networks, many research groups have turned to mathematical models (differential equations based on standard biochemical rate laws, e.g., mass-action, Michaelis-Menten, Hill). When using Michaelis-Menten rate expressions to model PINs, care must be exercised to avoid making inconsistent assumptions about enzyme-substrate complexes. We show that an appealingly simple model of a PIN that functions as a bistable switch is compromised by neglecting enzyme-substrate intermediates. When the neglected intermediates are put back into the model, bistability of the switch is lost. The theory of chemical reaction networks predicts that bistability can be recovered by adding specific reaction channels to the molecular mechanism. We explore two very different routes to recover bistability. In both cases, we show how to convert the original 'phenomenological' model into a consistent set of mass-action rate laws that retains the desired bistability properties. Once an equivalent model is formulated in terms of elementary chemical reactions, it can be simulated accurately either by deterministic differential equations or by Gillespie's stochastic simulation algorithm.     

Functional annotation from predicted protein interaction networks

MOTIVATION: Progress in large-scale experimental determination of protein-protein interaction networks for several organisms has resulted in innovative methods of functional inference based on network connectivity. However, the amount of effort and resources required for the elucidation of experimental protein interaction networks is prohibitive. Previously we, and others, have developed techniques to predict protein interactions for novel genomes using computational methods and data generated from other genomes. RESULTS: We evaluated the performance of a network-based functional annotation method that makes use of our predicted protein interaction networks. We show that this approach performs equally well on experimentally derived and predicted interaction networks, for both manually and computationally assigned annotations. We applied the method to predicted protein interaction networks for over 50 organisms from all domains of life, providing annotations for many previously unannotated proteins and verifying existing low-confidence annotations. AVAILABILITY: Functional predictions for over 50 organisms are available at http://bioverse.compbio.washington.edu and datasets used for analysis at http://data.compbio.washington.edu/misc/downloads/nannotation_data/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A supplemental appendix gives additional details not in the main text. (http://data.compbio.washington.edu/misc/downloads/nannotation_data/supplement.pdf).     

Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks.

With an ever-increasing amount of available data on protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and research revealing that these networks evolve at a modular level, discovery of conserved patterns in these networks becomes an important problem. Although available data on protein-protein interactions is currently limited, recently developed algorithms have been shown to convey novel biological insights through employment of elegant mathematical models. The main challenge in aligning PPI networks is to define a graph theoretical measure of similarity between graph structures that captures underlying biological phenomena accurately. In this respect, modeling of conservation and divergence of interactions, as well as the interpretation of resulting alignments, are important design parameters. In this paper, we develop a framework for comprehensive alignment of PPI networks, which is inspired by duplication/divergence models that focus on understanding the evolution of protein interactions. We propose a mathematical model that extends the concepts of match, mismatch, and gap in sequence alignment to that of match, mismatch, and duplication in network alignment and evaluates similarity between graph structures through a scoring function that accounts for evolutionary events. By relying on evolutionary models, the proposed framework facilitates interpretation of resulting alignments in terms of not only conservation but also divergence of modularity in PPI networks. Furthermore, as in the case of sequence alignment, our model allows flexibility in adjusting parameters to quantify underlying evolutionary relationships. Based on the proposed model, we formulate PPI network alignment as an optimization problem and present fast algorithms to solve this problem. Detailed experimental results from an implementation of the proposed framework show that our algorithm is able to discover conserved interaction patterns very effectively, in terms of both accuracies and computational cost.     

Computational analysis of human protein interaction networks

Large amounts of human protein interaction data have been produced by experiments and prediction methods. However, the experimental coverage of the human interactome is still low in contrast to predicted data. To gain insight into the value of publicly available human protein network data, we compared predicted datasets, high-throughput results from yeast two-hybrid screens, and literature-curated protein-protein interactions. This evaluation is not only important for further methodological improvements, but also for increasing the confidence in functional hypotheses derived from predictions. Therefore, we assessed the quality and the potential bias of the different datasets using functional similarity based on the Gene Ontology, structural iPfam domain-domain interactions, likelihood ratios, and topological network parameters. This analysis revealed major differences between predicted datasets, but some of them also scored at least as high as the experimental ones regarding multiple quality measures. Therefore, since only small pair wise overlap between most datasets is observed, they may be combined to enlarge the available human interactome data. For this purpose, we additionally studied the influence of protein length on data quality and the number of disease proteins covered by each dataset. We could further demonstrate that protein interactions predicted by more than one method achieve an elevated reliability.     

Systematic computational prediction of protein interaction networks

Determining the network of physical protein associations is an important first step in developing mechanistic evidence for elucidating biological pathways. Despite rapid advances in the field of high throughput experiments to determine protein interactions, the majority of associations remain unknown. Here we describe computational methods for significantly expanding protein association networks. We describe methods for integrating multiple independent sources of evidence to obtain higher quality predictions and we compare the major publicly available resources available for experimentalists to use.