ATP-Dependent Inactivation and Sequestration of Ornithine Decarboxylase by the 26S Proteasome Are Prerequisites for Degradation

The 26S proteasome is a eukaryotic ATP-dependent protease, but the molecular basis of its energy requirement is largely unknown. Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is the only known enzyme to be degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitinylation. We report here that the 26S proteasome is responsible for the irreversible inactivation coupled to sequestration of ODC, a process requiring ATP and antizyme (AZ) but not proteolytic activity. Neither the 20S proteasome (catalytic core) nor PA700 (the regulatory complex) by itself contributed to this ODC inactivation. Analysis with a C-terminal mutant ODC revealed that the 26S proteasome recognizes the C-terminal degradation signal of ODC exposed by attachment of AZ, and subsequent ATP-dependent sequestration of ODC in the 26S proteasome causes irreversible inactivation, possibly unfolding, of ODC and dissociation of AZ. These processes may be linked to the translocation of ODC into the 20S proteasomal inner cavity, centralized within the 26S proteasome, for degradation.     

Subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S Regulator of the 26 S Proteasome, Reveal Relative Roles of AAA Subunits in 26 S Proteasome Assembly and Activation and ATPase Activity

We have identified, purified, and characterized three subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S regulatory complex of the 26 S proteasome. These subcomplexes (denoted PS-1, PS-2, and PS-3) collectively account for all subunits present in purified PA700 but contain no overlapping components or significant levels of non-PA700 proteins. Each subcomplex contained two of the six AAA subunits (Rpt1–6) that form the binding interface of PA700 with the 20 S proteasome, the protease component of the 26 S proteasome. Unlike intact PA700, no individual PA700 subcomplex displayed ATPase activity or proteasome activating activity. However, both activities were manifested by ATP-dependent in vitro reconstitution of PA700 from the subcomplexes. We exploited functional reconstitution to define and distinguish roles of different PA700 subunits in PA700 function by selective alteration of subunits within individual subcomplexes prior to reconstitution. Carboxypeptidase treatment of either PS-2 or PS-3, subcomplexes containing specific Rpt subunits previously shown to have important roles in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation, inhibited these processes but did not affect PA700 reconstitution or ATPase activity. Thus, the intact C termini of both subunits are required for 26 S proteasome assembly and activation but not for PA700 reconstitution. Surprisingly, carboxypeptidase treatment of PS-1 also inhibited 26 S proteasome assembly and activation upon reconstitution with untreated PS-2 and PS-3. These results suggest a previously unidentified role for other PA700 subunits in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation. Our results reveal relative structural and functional relationships among the AAA subunits of PA700 and new insights about mechanisms of 26 S proteasome assembly and activation.The 26 S proteasome is a 2,500,000-Da protease complex that degrades polyubiquitylated proteins by an ATP-dependent mechanism (1, 2). The biochemical processes required for this function are divided between two subcomplexes that compose the holoenzyme (3, 4). The first, called 20 S proteasome or core particle, is a 700,000-Da complex that catalyzes peptide bond hydrolysis (5). The second, called PA700 or 19 S regulatory particle, is a 700,000-Da complex that mediates multiple aspects of proteasome function related to initial binding and subsequent delivery of substrates to the catalytic sites of the 20 S proteasome (6). The 20 S proteasome is composed of 28 subunits representing the products of 14 genes arranged in four axially stacked heteroheptameric rings (7, 8). Each of the two center β rings contains three different protease subunits that utilize N-terminal threonine residues as catalytic nucleophiles (5, 8, 9). These residues line an interior lumen formed by the stacked rings and thus are sequestered from interaction with substrates by a shell of 20 S proteasome subunits.PA700 is composed of 20 different subunits. Six of these subunits, termed Rpt1–6, are AAA² (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) family members that confer ATPase activity to the complex and mediate energy-dependent proteolysis by the 26 S proteasome (2, 10). 26 S proteasome assembly from PA700 and 20 S proteasome requires ATP binding to Rpt subunits (11–15). Binding of PA700 to the 20 S proteasome occurs at an axial interface between a heterohexameric ring of the PA700 Rpt subunits and the heteroheptameric outer ring of α-type 20 S proteasome subunits (16). Substrates enter the proteasome through a pore in the center of the α subunit ring that is reversibly gated by conformationally variable N-terminal residues of certain α subunits in response to PA700 binding (12, 17–19). Although the degradation of polyubiquitylated proteins requires additional ATP hydrolysis-dependent actions by PA700, the assembled 26 S proteasome displays greatly increased rates of energy-independent degradation of short peptides by virtue of their increased access to catalytic sites via diffusion through the open pore (15, 18, 20).Recently, specific interactions between Rpt and α subunits that determine PA700-20 S proteasome binding and gate opening have been defined. These findings established nonequivalent roles among the six different Rpt subunits for these processes (12, 19). For example, carboxypeptidase A treatment of PA700 selectively cleaves the C termini of two Rpt subunits (Rpt2 and Rpt5) and renders PA700 incompetent for proteasome binding and activation (19). Remarkably, short peptides corresponding to the C terminus of either Rpt2 or Rpt5, but none of the other Rpt subunits, were sufficient to bind to the 20 S proteasome and activate peptide substrate hydrolysis by inducing gate opening (12, 15, 18). The C-terminal peptides of Rpt2 and Rpt5 appear to bind to different and distinct sites on the proteasome and produce additive effects on rates of peptide substrate hydrolysis, suggesting that pore size or another feature of gating can be variably modulated (19). These various results, however, do not specify whether the action of one or the other or both C-terminal peptides is essential for function of intact PA700.In addition to its role in activation, PA700 plays other essential roles in 26 S proteasome function related to substrate selection and processing. For example, PA700 captures polyubiquitylated proteins via multiple subunits that bind polyubiquitin chains (21–23). Moreover, to ensure translocation of the bound ubiquitylated protein through the narrow opened substrate access pore for proteolysis, PA700 destabilizes the tertiary structure of the protein via chaperone-like activity and removes polyubiquitin chains via deubiquitylating activities of several different subunits (24–30). These various functions appear to be highly coordinated and may be mechanistically linked to one another and to the hydrolysis of ATP by Rpt subunits during substrate processing.Despite support for this general model of PA700 action, there is a lack of detailed knowledge about how PA700 subunits are structurally organized and functionally linked. Previously, we identified and characterized a subcomplex of PA700 called “modulator” that contained two ATPase subunits, Rpt4 and Rpt5, and one non-ATPase subunit, p27 (31). Although this protein was identified by an assay that measured increased PA700-dependent proteasome activation, the mechanistic basis of this effect was not clear. Moreover, the modulator lacked detectable ATPase activity and proteasome activating activity. The latter feature is surprising in retrospect because of the newly identified capacity of Rpt5 to activate the proteasome directly (12, 19). This disparity suggests that specific interactions among multiple PA700 subunits determine the manifestation and regulation of various activities.This study extends our recent findings regarding relative roles of Rpt subunits in the regulation of proteasome function. It also provides new insights and significance to older work that identified and characterized the modulator as a subcomplex of PA700. Our findings unite two different lines of investigation to offer new information about the structure, function, and regulation of 26 S proteasome. They also offer insights about alternative models for assembly of PA700 and 26 S proteasome in intact cells.     

Yeast Deubiquitinase Ubp3 Interacts with the 26 S Proteasome to Facilitate Rad4 Degradation

Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) function in a variety of cellular processes by removing ubiquitin moieties from substrates, but their role in DNA repair has not been elucidated. Yeast Rad4-Rad23 heterodimer is responsible for recognizing DNA damage in nucleotide excision repair (NER). Rad4 binds to UV damage directly while Rad23 stabilizes Rad4 from proteasomal degradation. Here, we show that disruption of yeast deubiquitinase UBP3 leads to enhanced UV resistance, increased repair of UV damage and Rad4 levels in rad23Δ cells, and elevated Rad4 stability. A catalytically inactive Ubp3 (Ubp3-C469A), however, is unable to affect NER or Rad4. Consistent with its role in down-regulating Rad4, Ubp3 physically interacts with Rad4 and the proteasome, both in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that Ubp3 associates with the proteasome to facilitate Rad4 degradation and thus suppresses NER.     

ASK1 Negatively Regulates the 26 S Proteasome

The 26 S proteasome, composed of the 20 S core and 19 S regulatory particle, plays a central role in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Disruption of this process contributes to the pathogenesis of the various diseases; however, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of 26 S proteasome activity remain elusive. Here, cell culture experiments and in vitro assays demonstrated that apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), a member of the MAPK kinase kinase family, negatively regulated 26 S proteasome activity. Immunoprecipitation/Western blot analyses revealed that ASK1 did not interact with 20 S catalytic core but did interact with ATPases making up the 19 S particle, which is responsible for recognizing polyubiquitinated proteins, unfolding them, and translocating them into the 20 S catalytic core in an ATP-dependent process. Importantly, ASK1 phosphorylated Rpt5, an AAA ATPase of the 19 S proteasome, and inhibited its ATPase activity, an effect that may underlie the ability of ASK1 to inhibit 26 S proteasome activity. The current findings point to a novel role for ASK1 in the regulation of 26 S proteasome and offer new strategies for treating human diseases caused by proteasome malfunction.     

26S蛋白酶体组装的分子机制研究

26S蛋白酶体广泛分布于真核细胞中的胞质和胞核,主要是由20S核心复合物(coreparticle,CP)和19S调节复合物(regulatory particle,RP)组成,它负责细胞大多数蛋白质的降解,在几乎所有生命活动中具有关键的调控作用。26S蛋白酶体的组装是一个非常复杂且高度条理的过程,不同的分子伴侣,如PAC1-4、Ump1、p27、p28和s5b等,参与其中发挥识别及调节作用,以确保高效准确地完成蛋白酶体的组装。本文系统总结分析了20S核心复合物和19S调节复合物的组装过程及调控机制的最近研究进展。     

26S蛋白酶体的结构生物学研究进展

26S蛋白酶体是真核细胞内负责蛋白质降解的主要分子机器,通过特异性降解目的蛋白质,几乎参与了生物体的绝大多数生命活动.26S蛋白酶体在结构上可分为19S调节颗粒和20S核心颗粒两部分.19S调节颗粒负责识别带有泛素链标记的蛋白质底物及对其进行去折叠,并最终将去折叠的蛋白质底物传送至20S核心颗粒中进行降解.由于26S蛋白酶体的结构组成复杂,分子量十分巨大,现有的X-ray技术和NMR技术对其完整结构的解析都无能为力,仅能解析出部分单个蛋白成员或分子量较低的亚复合物晶体结构.而冷冻电镜技术在相当一段时间内处于发展的初级阶段,导致其三维结构的研究进展曾经十分缓慢,严重阻碍了人们对其结构和功能的了解.近年来,随着在X-ray技术领域对大分子复合物结构解析的经验积累和冷冻电镜技术领域的技术革命,完整的26S蛋白酶体三维结构解析取得了飞速的发展.本文回顾了近几年在26S蛋白酶体结构生物学领域的重要进展,并展望了该领域未来的发展及面临的挑战.     

Degradation of ornithine decarboxylase by the 26S proteasome

Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is a key enzyme in polyamine biosynthesis. Turnover of ODC is extremely rapid and highly regulated, and is accelerated when polyamine levels increase. Polyamine-stimulated ODC degradation is mediated by association with antizyme (AZ), an ODC inhibitory protein induced by polyamines. ODC, in association with AZ, is degraded by the 26S proteasome in an ATP-dependent, but ubiquitin-independent, manner. The 26S proteasome irreversibly inactivates ODC prior to its degradation. The inactivation, possibly due to unfolding, is coupled to sequestration of ODC within the 26S proteasome. This process requires AZ and ATP, but not proteolytic activity of the 26S proteasome. The carboxyl-terminal region of ODC presumably exposed by interaction with AZ plays a critical role for being trapped by the 26S proteasome. Thus, the degradation pathway of ODC proceeds as a sequence of multiple distinct processes, including recognition, sequestration, unfolding, translocation, and ultimate degradation mediated by the 26S proteasome.     

Toward an Integrated Structural Model of the 26S Proteasome

The 26S proteasome is the end point of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and degrades ubiquitylated substrates. It is composed of the 20S core particle (CP), where degradation occurs, and the 19S regulatory particle (RP), which ensures substrate specificity of degradation. Whereas the CP is resolved to atomic resolution, the architecture of the RP is largely unknown. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the current structural knowledge on the RP, including structures of the RP subunits, physical protein-protein interactions, and cryoelectron microscopy data. These data allowed us to compute an atomic model for the CP-AAA-ATPase subcomplex. In addition to this atomic model, further subunits can be mapped approximately, which lets us hypothesize on the substrate path during its degradation.The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is the major route used by eukaryotic cells for the disposal of misfolded or damaged proteins and for controlling the lifespan of proteins (1–3). As a consequence, the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway regulates a plethora of fundamental cellular processes, such as protein quality control, DNA repair, and signal transduction (4). The 26S proteasome is a molecular machine of ∼2.5 MDa that targets polyubiquitylated proteins. It comprises two subcomplexes, the 20S core particle (CP)¹ and one or two copies of asymmetric 19S regulatory particles (RPs), which bind to the end(s) of the barrel-shaped CP.The active sites of the proteasome are located in the CP cavity where proteolytic cleavage of substrates takes place. Electron microscopy (EM) and x-ray crystallography have revealed that the CP is a cylinder consisting of four concentrically stacked rings (5–7): two identical “α”-rings, each assembled of seven homologous proteins, form the outer rings, and two identical “β”-rings, also assembled of seven homologs, form the two inner rings. Proteolysis is confined to the cavity formed by the β-rings, a nanocompartment sequestered from the cytosol.The RPs regulate substrate degradation by (i) binding polyubiquitylated substrates, (ii) subsequently deubiquitylating them, (iii) substrate unfolding, and (iv) opening the “gate” to the CP (8). The RPs consists of six AAA-ATPase subunits and at least 13 non-ATPase subunits. In contrast to the CP, the architecture of the RP subunits remains largely unknown. The problems that hamper structural characterization of the RP are manifold. It has proven difficult to obtain homogeneous, concentrated preparations of 26S proteasomes or RPs because the RP tends to disassociate into heterogeneous subcomplexes during purification and concentration. Moreover, many of the RP subunits likely exhibit a significant degree of structural variability. As a consequence, x-ray crystallographic analysis of the entire RP has not been accomplished to date, and only a few subunit fragments have been amenable to high resolution structure determination.For cryo-EM and protein-protein interaction experiments, the requirements for sample homogeneity are less stringent. Recently, the Drosophila melanogaster 26S proteasome was resolved to ∼20 Å (9). Various proteomics approaches have led to proposals for topological maps of the RP (10–13). The resolution of protein-protein interaction data typically corresponds to the diameters of the proteins or domains found to interact, which are typically far beyond 20 Å. Because of the limited resolution, neither cryo-EM maps nor protein-protein interaction networks are by themselves sufficient to determine the RP architecture (i.e. the localization of the RP subunits in the complex).The integration of atomic models, cryo-EM maps, and protein-protein interaction data is currently the most promising approach to resolve the architecture of the 26S proteasome (14–18). Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the current structural knowledge on the RP, including structures of RP subunits, physical protein-protein interactions, and cryo-EM data. Based on these data, we provide a model for the CP-AAA-ATPase subcomplex. Finally, we outline a path toward resolving the architecture of the 26S proteasome by an integrative structure determination approach, which in turn will provide a basis for a mechanistic understanding.     

Structural Snapshots of 26S Proteasome Reveal Tetraubiquitin-Induced Conformations

1. Download high-res image (240KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

泛素/26S蛋白酶体途径与植物的生长发育

泛素/26S蛋白酶体途径在植物蛋白降解系统中起重要作用,泛素分子主要通过泛素活化酶(E1)、泛素结合酶(E2)和泛素连接酶(E3)将靶蛋白泛素化,泛素化的蛋白最后被26S蛋白酶体识别和降解。泛素蛋白酶体途径参与植物体内的多种生理过程,如花和胚的发育、光形态建成、植物生长物质等几乎所有的生长发育过程,本文主要对泛素/26S蛋白酶体途径及其在植物生长发育过程中的精确调控作用进行综述。     

Regulation of the Cyclin B Degradation System by an Inhibitor of Mitotic Proteolysis

The initiation of anaphase and exit from mitosis depend on the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), which mediates the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of anaphase-inhibiting proteins and mitotic cyclins. We have analyzed whether protein phosphatases are required for mitotic APC activation. In Xenopus egg extracts APC activation occurs normally in the presence of protein phosphatase 1 inhibitors, suggesting that the anaphase defects caused by protein phosphatase 1 mutation in several organisms are not due to a failure to activate the APC. Contrary to this, the initiation of mitotic cyclin B proteolysis is prevented by inhibitors of protein phosphatase 2A such as okadaic acid. Okadaic acid induces an activity that inhibits cyclin B ubiquitination. We refer to this activity as inhibitor of mitotic proteolysis because it also prevents the degradation of other APC substrates. A similar activity exists in extracts of Xenopus eggs that are arrested at the second meiotic metaphase by the cytostatic factor activity of the protein kinase mos. In Xenopus eggs, the initiation of anaphase II may therefore be prevented by an inhibitor of APC-dependent ubiquitination.     

Inherent Asymmetry in the 26S Proteasome Is Defined by the Ubiquitin Receptor RPN13

The 26S double-capped proteasome is assembled in a hierarchic event that is orchestrated by dedicated set of chaperons. To date, all stoichiometric subunits are considered to be present in equal ratios, thus providing symmetry to the double-capped complex. Here, we show that although the vast majority (if not all) of the double-capped 26S proteasomes, both 19S complexes, contain the ubiquitin receptor Rpn10/S5a, only one of these 19S particles contains the additional ubiquitin receptor Rpn13, thereby defining asymmetry in the 26S proteasome. These results were validated in yeast and mammals, utilizing biochemical and unbiased AQUA-MS methodologies. Thus, the double-capped 26S proteasomes are asymmetric in their polyubiquitin binding capacity. Our data point to a potential new role for ubiquitin receptors as directionality factors that may participate in the prevention of simultaneous substrates translocation into the 20S from both 19S caps.     

Activation of the 20S Proteasome of Xenopus Oocytes by Cardiolipin: Blockage of the Activation of Trypsin-like Activity by the Substrate

The effects of an activator, cardiolipin, on the three peptidase activities of the 20S proteasome of Xenopus oocytes were examined. The trypsin-like activity was activated when the enzyme was treated with cardiolipin before the addition of the substrate, but there was no appreciable activation when cardiolipin was added concomitantly with the substrate. On the other hand, the chymotrypsin-like peptidase and peptidylglutamylpeptide hydrolase (PGPH) were activated regardless of the sequence of addition. When very low concentrations of the substrate (e.g. 0.1-0.5 μM; about 1/100 of the K _m) were used, cardiolipin strongly activated trypsin-like peptidase by the simultaneous addition but not after substrate addition. These results suggest that the trypsin-type substrate produces a conformational change in the enzyme in a concentration-dependent manner which makes the activator sites inaccessible to cardiolipin.     

The ATP Costs and Time Required to Degrade Ubiquitinated Proteins by the 26 S Proteasome

The degradation of ubiquitinated proteins by 26 S proteasomes requires ATP hydrolysis. To investigate if the six proteasomal ATPases function independently or in a cyclic manner, as proposed recently, we used yeast mutants that prevent ATP binding to Rpt3, Rpt5, or Rpt6. Although proteasomes contain six ATPase subunits, each of these single mutations caused a 66% reduction in basal ATP hydrolysis, and each blocked completely the 2–3-fold stimulation of ATPase activity induced by ubiquitinated substrates. Therefore, the ATPase subunits must function in a ordered manner, in which each is required for the stimulation of ATPase activity by substrates. Although ATP is essential for multiple steps in proteasome function, when the rate of ATP hydrolysis was reduced incrementally, the degradation of Ub₅-DHFR (where Ub is ubiquitin and DHFR is dihydrofolate reductase) decreased exactly in parallel. This direct proportionality implies that a specific number of ATPs is consumed in degrading a ubiquitinated protein. When the ubiquitinated DHFR was more tightly folded (upon addition of the ligand folate), the rate of ATP hydrolysis was unchanged, but the time to degrade a Ub₅-DHFR molecule (∼13 s) and the energy expenditure (50–80 ATPs/Ub₅-DHFR) both increased by 2-fold. With a mutation in the ATPase C terminus that reduced gate opening into the 20 S proteasome, the energy costs and time required for conjugate degradation also increased. Thus, different ubiquitin conjugates activate similarly the ATPase subunit cycle that drives proteolysis, but polypeptide structure determines the time required for degradation and thus the energy cost.