On the nature of the RecBC and RecF pathways of conjugal recombination in Escherichia coli

The molecular mechanisms of the RecBC and RecF pathways for genetic recombination in E. coli were investigated by studying the kinetics of RecA protein function during conjugation. RecF recombination in recBC sbcB mutants is shown to be a much slower process than RecBC recombination in recBC+ sbcB+ strains, and is blocked by a mutation in lexA that prevents induction of RecA protein. Progress of the RecF pathway is greatly accelerated by a recAoc mutation which increases synthesis of RecA protein, but this does not restore recombination proficiency to a recBC sbcB lexA mutant. These results are interpreted to suggest that the RecF pathway directs integration of single-stranded Hfr DNA into the recipient chromosome whereas the RecBC pathway catalyses the exchange of largely double stranded DNA. This is consistent with the known stoichiometry of RecA protein catalysed heteroduplex DNA formation in vitro and with the delayed replication of RecF pathway recombinants which approximates to the time required for one round of DNA replication to generate homoduplex DNA. The regulation of the RecF pathway by lexA repressor is discussed in relation to the factors that govern the relative utilization of the two recombination pathways in wild-type cells.     

Identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA ligase IV: involvement in DNA double-strand break repair.

DNA ligases catalyse the joining of single and double-strand DNA breaks, which is an essential final step in DNA replication, recombination and repair. Mammalian cells have four DNA ligases, termed ligases I-IV. In contrast, other than a DNA ligase I homologue (encoded by CDC9), no other DNA ligases have hitherto been identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we report the identification and characterization of a novel gene, LIG4, which encodes a protein with strong homology to mammalian DNA ligase IV. Unlike CDC9, LIG4 is not essential for DNA replication, RAD52-dependent homologous recombination nor the repair of UV light-induced DNA damage. Instead, it encodes a crucial component of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) apparatus, which repairs DNA double-strand breaks that are generated by ionizing radiation or restriction enzyme digestion: a function which cannot be complemented by CDC9. Lig4p acts in the same DNA repair pathway as the DNA end-binding protein Ku. However, unlike Ku, it does not function in telomere length homeostasis. These findings indicate diversification of function between different eukaryotic DNA ligases. Furthermore, they provide insights into mechanisms of DNA repair and suggest that the NHEJ pathway is highly conserved throughout the eukaryotic kingdom.     

The RecE recombination pathway mediates recombination between partially homologous DNA sequences: structural analysis of recombination products

Escherichia coli generalized recombination, utilizing the RecA RecB recombination pathway, requires large stretches (70-200 bp) of complete DNA sequence homology. In contrast, we have found that the RecE pathway can promote recombination between DNA with only short stretches of homology. A plasmid containing 10 partially homologous direct repeats was linearized by digestion with specific restriction enzymes. After transformation, a RecE+ (sbcA) host was able to circularize the plasmid by recombination between partially homologous direct repeat sequences. Recombination occurred in regions of as little as 6 bp of perfect homology. Recombination was enhanced in the regions adjacent to restriction sites used to linearize the plasmid, consistent with a role of double-strand breaks in promoting recombination. A mechanism is proposed in which the 5' exonuclease, ExoVIII, produces 3' single-stranded ends from the linearized plasmid. These pair with other sequences of partial homology. Partial homologies in the sequences flanking the actual join serve to stabilize this recombination intermediate. Recombination is completed by a process of "copy and join." This recombination mechanism requires less homology to stabilize intermediates than the degree of homology needed for mechanisms involving strand invasion. Its role in nature may be to increase genomic diversity, for example, by enhancing recombination between bacteriophages and regions of the bacterial chromosome.     

Mechanisms of intermolecular homologous recombination in plants as studied with single- and double-stranded DNA molecules.

To elucidate the mechanism for intermolecular homologous recombination in plants we cotransformed Nicotiana tabacum cv Petit Havana SR1 protoplasts with constructs carrying different defective derivatives of the NPTII gene. The resulting kanamycin resistant clones were screened for possible recombination products by PCR, which proved to be a valuable technique for this analysis. Our results show that the double-stranded circular DNA molecules used in this study recombine predominantly via a pathway consistent with the single-strand annealing (SSA) model as proposed for extrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells. In the remaining cases recombination occurred via a single reciprocal recombination, gene conversion and possibly double reciprocal recombination. Since single-stranded DNA is considered to be an important intermediate in homologous recombination we also established the recombination ability of single-stranded DNA in intermolecular recombination. We found that single-stranded DNA enters in recombination processes more efficiently than the corresponding double-stranded DNA. This was also reflected in the recombination mechanisms that generated the functional NPTII gene. Recombination between a single-stranded DNA and the complementing DNA duplex occurred at similar rates via a single reciprocal recombination and the SSA pathway.     

Recombinational Repair of DNA Damage in Escherichia coli and Bacteriophage λ

Although homologous recombination and DNA repair phenomena in bacteria were initially extensively studied without regard to any relationship between the two, it is now appreciated that DNA repair and homologous recombination are related through DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, two-strand DNA damage, generated mostly during replication on a template DNA containing one-strand damage, is repaired by recombination with a homologous intact duplex, usually the sister chromosome. The two major types of two-strand DNA lesions are channeled into two distinct pathways of recombinational repair: daughter-strand gaps are closed by the RecF pathway, while disintegrated replication forks are reestablished by the RecBCD pathway. The phage λ recombination system is simpler in that its major reaction is to link two double-stranded DNA ends by using overlapping homologous sequences. The remarkable progress in understanding the mechanisms of recombinational repair in E. coli over the last decade is due to the in vitro characterization of the activities of individual recombination proteins. Putting our knowledge about recombinational repair in the broader context of DNA replication will guide future experimentation.     

Rad51 Paralog Complexes BCDX2 and CX3 Act at Different Stages in the BRCA1-BRCA2-Dependent Homologous Recombination Pathway

The Rad51 paralogs are required for homologous recombination (HR) and the maintenance of genomic stability. The molecular mechanisms by which the five vertebrate Rad51 paralogs regulate HR and genomic integrity remain unclear. The Rad51 paralogs associate with one another in two distinct complexes: Rad51B-Rad51C-Rad51D-XRCC2 (BCDX2) and Rad51C-XRCC3 (CX3). We find that the BCDX2 and CX3 complexes act at different stages of the HR pathway. In response to DNA damage, the BCDX2 complex acts downstream of BRCA2 recruitment but upstream of Rad51 recruitment. In contrast, the CX3 complex acts downstream of Rad51 recruitment but still has a marked impact on the measured frequency of homologous recombination. Both complexes are epistatic with BRCA2 and synthetically lethal with Rad52. We conclude that human Rad51 paralogs facilitate BRCA2-Rad51-dependent homologous recombination at different stages in the pathway and function independently of Rad52.     

Suppression of recA deficiency in plasmid recombination by bacteriophage lambda beta protein in RecBCD- ExoI- Escherichia coli cells.

Plasmid recombination, like other homologous recombination in Escherichia coli, requires RecA protein in most conditions. We have found that the plasmid recombination defect in a recA mutant can be efficiently suppressed by the beta protein of bacteriophage lambda. beta protein is required for homologous recombination of lambda chromosomes during lytic phage growth in a recA host and is known to have a strand-annealing activity resembling that of RecA protein. The bioluminescence recombination assay was used for genetic analysis of beta-protein-mediated plasmid recombination. Efficient suppression of the recA mutation by beta protein required the absence of the E. coli nucleases exonuclease I and RecBCD nuclease. These nucleases inhibit a RecA-mediated plasmid recombination pathway that is more efficient than the pathway functioning in wild-type cells. Like RecA-mediated plasmid recombination in RecBCD- ExoI- cells, beta-protein-mediated plasmid recombination depended on concurrent DNA replication and on the activity of the recQ gene. However, unlike RecA-mediated plasmid recombination, beta-protein-mediated recombination in RecBCD- ExoI- cells was independent of recF and recJ activities. We propose that inactivation of exonuclease I and RecBCD nuclease stabilizes a recombination intermediate that is involved in RecA- and beta-protein-catalyzed homologous pairing reactions. We suggest that the intermediate may be linear plasmid DNA with a protruding 3' end, since these nucleases are known to interfere with the synthesis of such linear forms. The different recF and recJ requirements for beta-protein-dependent and RecA-dependent recombinations imply that the mechanisms of formation or processing of the putative intermediate differ in the two cases.     

Inactivation of recG stimulates the RecF pathway during lesion-induced recombination in E. coli

Lesions that transiently block DNA synthesis generate replication intermediates with recombinogenic potential. In order to investigate the mechanisms involved in lesion-induced recombination, we developed an homologous recombination assay involving the transfer of genetic information from a plasmid donor molecule to the Escherichia coli chromosome. The replication blocking lesion used in the present assay is formed by covalent binding of the carcinogen N-2-acetylaminofluorene to the C8 position of guanine residues (G-AAF adducts). The frequency of recombination events was monitored as a function of the number of lesions present on the donor plasmid. These DNA adducts are found to trigger high levels of homologous recombination events in a dose-dependent manner. Formation of recombinants is entirely RecA-dependent, the RecF and RecBCD sub-pathways accounting for about 2/3 and 1/3, respectively. Inactivation of recG stimulates recombinant formation about five-fold. In a recG background, the RecF pathway is stimulated about four-fold, while the contribution of the RecBCD pathway remains constant. In addition, in the recG strain, a recombination pathway that accounts for about 30% of the recombinants and requires genes that belong to both RecF and RecBCD pathways is revealed.     

Replication and recombination factors contributing to recombination-dependent bypass of DNA lesions by template switch

Damage tolerance mechanisms mediating damage-bypass and gap-filling are crucial for genome integrity. A major damage tolerance pathway involves recombination and is referred to as template switch. Template switch intermediates were visualized by 2D gel electrophoresis in the proximity of replication forks as X-shaped structures involving sister chromatid junctions. The homologous recombination factor Rad51 is required for the formation/stabilization of these intermediates, but its mode of action remains to be investigated. By using a combination of genetic and physical approaches, we show that the homologous recombination factors Rad55 and Rad57, but not Rad59, are required for the formation of template switch intermediates. The replication-proficient but recombination-defective rfa1-t11 mutant is normal in triggering a checkpoint response following DNA damage but is impaired in X-structure formation. The Exo1 nuclease also has stimulatory roles in this process. The checkpoint kinase, Rad53, is required for X-molecule formation and phosphorylates Rad55 robustly in response to DNA damage. Although Rad55 phosphorylation is thought to activate recombinational repair under conditions of genotoxic stress, we find that Rad55 phosphomutants do not affect the efficiency of X-molecule formation. We also examined the DNA polymerase implicated in the DNA synthesis step of template switch. Deficiencies in translesion synthesis polymerases do not affect X-molecule formation, whereas DNA polymerase δ, required also for bulk DNA synthesis, plays an important role. Our data indicate that a subset of homologous recombination factors, together with DNA polymerase δ, promote the formation of template switch intermediates that are then preferentially dissolved by the action of the Sgs1 helicase in association with the Top3 topoisomerase rather than resolved by Holliday Junction nucleases. Our results allow us to propose the choreography through which different players contribute to template switch in response to DNA damage and to distinguish this process from other recombination-mediated processes promoting DNA repair.     

Genetic transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with single-stranded circular DNA vectors

We asked if single-stranded vector DNA molecules could be used to reintroduce cloned DNA sequences into a eukaryotic cell and cause genetic transformation typical of that observed using double-stranded DNA vectors. DNA was presented to Saccharomyces cerevisiae following a standard transformation protocol, genetic transformants were isolated, and the physical state of the transforming DNA sequence was determined. We found that single-stranded DNA molecules transformed yeast cells 10- to 30-fold more efficiently than double-stranded molecules of identical sequence. More cells were competent for transformation by the single-stranded molecules. Single-stranded circular (ssc) DNA molecules carrying the yeast 2 μ plasmid-replicator sequence were converted to autonomously replicating double-stranded circular (dsc) molecules, suggesting their efficient utilization as templates for DNA synthesis in the cell. Single-stranded DNA molecules carrying 2 μ plasmid non-replicator sequences recombined with the endogenous multicopy 2 μ plasmid DNA. This recombination yielded either the simple molecular adduct expected from homologous recombination (40% of the transformants examined) or aberrant recombination products carrying incomplete transforming DNA sequences, endogenous 2 μ plasmid DNA sequences, or both (60% of the transformants examined). These aberrant recombination products suggest the frequent use of a recombination pathway that trims one or both of the substrate DNA molecules. Similar aberrant recombination products were detected in 30% of the transformants in cotransformation experiments employing single-stranded and double-stranded DNA molecules, one carrying the 2 μ plasmid replicator sequence and the other the selectable genetic marker. We conclude that single-stranded DNA molecules are useful vectors for the genetic transformation of a eukaryotic cell. They offer the advantage of high transformation efficiency, and yield the same intracellular DNA species obtained upon transformation with double-stranded DNA molecules. In addition, single-stranded DNA molecules can participate in a recombination pathway that trims one or both DNA recombination substrates, a pathway not detected, at least at the same frequency, when transforming with double-stranded DNA molecules     

Direct and Indirect Control of the Initiation of Meiotic Recombination by DNA Damage Checkpoint Mechanisms in Budding Yeast

Meiotic recombination plays an essential role in the proper segregation of chromosomes at meiosis I in many sexually reproducing organisms. Meiotic recombination is initiated by the scheduled formation of genome-wide DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The timing of DSB formation is strictly controlled because unscheduled DSB formation is detrimental to genome integrity. Here, we investigated the role of DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in the control of meiotic DSB formation using budding yeast. By using recombination defective mutants in which meiotic DSBs are not repaired, the effect of DNA damage checkpoint mutations on DSB formation was evaluated. The Tel1 (ATM) pathway mainly responds to unresected DSB ends, thus the sae2 mutant background in which DSB ends remain intact was employed. On the other hand, the Mec1 (ATR) pathway is primarily used when DSB ends are resected, thus the rad51 dmc1 double mutant background was employed in which highly resected DSBs accumulate. In order to separate the effect caused by unscheduled cell cycle progression, which is often associated with DNA damage checkpoint defects, we also employed the ndt80 mutation which permanently arrests the meiotic cell cycle at prophase I. In the absence of Tel1, DSB formation was reduced in larger chromosomes (IV, VII, II and XI) whereas no significant reduction was found in smaller chromosomes (III and VI). On the other hand, the absence of Rad17 (a critical component of the ATR pathway) lead to an increase in DSB formation (chromosomes VII and II were tested). We propose that, within prophase I, the Tel1 pathway facilitates DSB formation, especially in bigger chromosomes, while the Mec1 pathway negatively regulates DSB formation. We also identified prophase I exit, which is under the control of the DNA damage checkpoint machinery, to be a critical event associated with down-regulating meiotic DSB formation.     

Roles for λ Orf and Escherichia Coli Reco, Recr and Recf in λ Recombination

Bacteriophage λ lacking its Red recombination functions requires either its own gene product, Orf, or the product of Escherichia coli's recO, recR and recF genes (RecORF) for efficient recombination in recBC sbcB sbcC mutant cells (the RecF pathway). Phage crosses under conditions of a partial block to DNA replication have revealed the following: (1) In the presence of Orf, RecF pathway recombination is similar to λ Red recombination; (2) Orf is necessary for focusing recombination toward the right end of the chromosome as λ is conventionally drawn; (3) RecORF-mediated RecF pathway recombination is not focused toward the right end of the chromosome, which may indicate that RecORF travels along the DNA; (4) both Orf- and RecORF-mediated RecF pathway recombination are stimulated by DNA replication; and (5) low level recombination in the simultaneous absence of Orf and RecORF may occur by a break-copy mechanism that is not initiated by a double strand break. Models for the roles of Orf and RecO, RecR and RecF in recombination are presented.     

Loss of nonhomologous end joining confers camptothecin resistance in DT40 cells. Implications for the repair of topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage

DNA topoisomerase I (Top1) generates transient DNA single-strand breaks via the formation of cleavage complexes in which the enzyme is linked to the 3'-phosphate of the cleavage strand. The anticancer drug camptothecin (CPT) poisons Top1 by trapping cleavage complexes, thereby inducing Top1-linked single-strand breaks. Such DNA lesions are converted into DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) upon collision with replication forks, implying that DSB repair pathways could be involved in the processing/repair of Top1-mediated DNA damage. Here we report that Top1-mediated DNA damage is repaired primarily by homologous recombination, a major pathway of DSB repair. Unexpectedly, however, we found that nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), another DSB repair pathway, has no positive role in the relevant repair; notably, DT40 cell mutants lacking either of the NHEJ factors (namely, Ku70, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit, and DNA ligase IV) were resistant to killing by CPT. In addition, we showed that the absence of NHEJ alleviates the requirement of homologous recombination in the repair of CPT-induced DNA damage. Our results indicate that NHEJ can be a cytotoxic pathway in the presence of CPT, shedding new light on the molecular mechanisms for the formation and repair of Top1-mediated DNA damage in vertebrates. Thus, our data have significant implications for cancer chemotherapy involving Top1 inhibitors.     

DNA Repair Mechanisms and the Bypass of DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA repair mechanisms are critical for maintaining the integrity of genomic DNA, and their loss is associated with cancer predisposition syndromes. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have played a central role in elucidating the highly conserved mechanisms that promote eukaryotic genome stability. This review will focus on repair mechanisms that involve excision of a single strand from duplex DNA with the intact, complementary strand serving as a template to fill the resulting gap. These mechanisms are of two general types: those that remove damage from DNA and those that repair errors made during DNA synthesis. The major DNA-damage repair pathways are base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair, which, in the most simple terms, are distinguished by the extent of single-strand DNA removed together with the lesion. Mistakes made by DNA polymerases are corrected by the mismatch repair pathway, which also corrects mismatches generated when single strands of non-identical duplexes are exchanged during homologous recombination. In addition to the true repair pathways, the postreplication repair pathway allows lesions or structural aberrations that block replicative DNA polymerases to be tolerated. There are two bypass mechanisms: an error-free mechanism that involves a switch to an undamaged template for synthesis past the lesion and an error-prone mechanism that utilizes specialized translesion synthesis DNA polymerases to directly synthesize DNA across the lesion. A high level of functional redundancy exists among the pathways that deal with lesions, which minimizes the detrimental effects of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage.     

Quantitation of a simian virus 40 nonhomologous recombination pathway.

We describe an infectious-center in situ plaque hybridization procedure which quantitates simian virus 40 (SV40) nonhomologous recombination in terms of the number of recombinant-producing cells in the DNA transfected cell population. Using this assay to measure the efficiency of recombination with SV40 DNA in permissive monkey BSC-1 cells, we found that: (i) over a range of DNA concentrations, polyomavirus DNA (which is partially homologous to SV40 DNA) cannot be distinguished from nonhomologous phi X174 RF1 DNA with respect to its ability to recombine with SV40 DNA; (ii) at defined DNA concentrations, polyomavirus and phi X174 RF1 DNA compete with each other for recombination with SV40 DNA; (iii) virtually all segments of the phi X174 genome recombine, apparently at random, with SV40 DNA; (iv) the frequency of recombinant-producing cells, among the successfully transfected (virion-producing) cells, depends upon the input SV40 DNA concentration in the transfection solution; and (v) replication-defective SV40 mutant DNAs compete with wild-type SV40 DNA for recombination with phi X174 RF1 DNA. From these observations, we conclude that the efficiency of recombination with SV40, in the system under study, is unaffected by nucleotide sequence homology and that a limiting stage in the recombination pathway occurs before SV40 DNA replication. Comparison of the dependency of recombination on initial SV40 DNA concentration with the dependency on initial phi X174 RF1 DNA concentration indicates that SV40 DNA sequences are a controlling factor in the nonhomologous recombination pathway.     

Molecular mechanisms of DNA damage and repair: progress in plants

Despite stable genomes of all living organisms, they are subject to damage by chemical and physical agents in the environment (e.g., UV and ionizing. radiations, chemical mutagens, fungal and bacterial toxins, etc.) and by free radicals or alkylating agents endogenously generated in metabolism. DNA is also damaged because of errors during its replication. The DNA lesions produced by these damaging agents could be altered base, missing base, mismatch base, deletion or insertion, linked pyrimidines, strand breaks, intra- and inter-strand cross-links. These DNA lesions could be genotoxic or cytotoxic to the cell. Plants are most affected by the UV-B radiation of sunlight, which penetrates and damages their genome by inducing oxidative damage (pyrimidine hydrates) and cross-links (both DNA protein and DNA-DNA) that are responsible for retarding the growth and development. The DNA lesions can be removed by repair, replaced by recombination, or retained, leading to genome instability or mutations or carcinogenesis or cell death. Mostly organisms respond to genome damage by activating a DNA damage response pathway that regulates cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair pathways. To prevent the harmful effect of DNA damage and maintain the genome integrity, all organisms have developed various strategies to either reverse, excise, or tolerate the persistence of DNA damage products by generating a network of DNA repair mechanisms. A variety of different DNA repair pathways have been reported that include direct reversal, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, photoreactivation, bypass, double-strand break repair pathway, and mismatch repair pathway. The direct reversal and photoreactivation require single protein, all the rest of the repair mechanisms utilize multiple proteins to remove or repair the lesions. The base excision repair pathway eliminates single damaged base, while nucleotide excision repair excises a patch of 25- to 32-nucleotide-long oligomer, including the damage. The double-strand break repair utilizes either homologous recombination or nonhomologous endjoining. In plant the latter pathway is more error prone than in other eukaryotes, which could be an important driving force in plant genome evolution. The Arabidopsis genome data indicated that the DNA repair is highly conserved between plants and mammals than within the animal kingdom, perhaps reflecting common factors such as DNA methylation. This review describes all the possible mechanisms of DNA damage and repair in general and an up to date progress in plants. In addition, various types of DNA damage products, free radical production, lipid peroxidation, role of ozone, dessication damage of plant seed, DNA integrity in pollen, and the role of DNA helicases in damage and repair and the repair genes in Arabidopsis genome are also covered in this review.     

The Hyper-Gene Conversion Hpr5-1 Mutation of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Is an Allele of the Srs2/Radh Gene

The HPR5 gene has been defined by the mutation hpr5-1 that results in an increased rate of gene conversion. This mutation suppresses the UV sensitive phenotype of rad18 mutations in hpr5-1 rad18 double mutants by channeling the aborted repair events into a recombination repair pathway. The HPR5 gene has been cloned and is shown to be allelic to the SRS2/RADH gene, a putative DNA helicase. The HPR5 gene, which is nonessential, is tightly linked to the ARG3 locus chromosome X. The hpr5-1 allele contains missense mutation in the putative ATP binding domain. A comparison of the recombination properties of the hpr5-1 allele and the null allele suggests that recombination events in hpr5 defective strains can be generated by several mechanisms. We propose that the HPR5 gene functions in the RAD6 repair pathway.     

Neddylation inhibits CtIP-mediated resection and regulates DNA double strand break repair pathway choice

DNA double strand breaks are the most cytotoxic lesions that can occur on the DNA. They can be repaired by different mechanisms and optimal survival requires a tight control between them. Here we uncover protein deneddylation as a major controller of repair pathway choice. Neddylation inhibition changes the normal repair profile toward an increase on homologous recombination. Indeed, RNF111/UBE2M-mediated neddylation acts as an inhibitor of BRCA1 and CtIP-mediated DNA end resection, a key process in repair pathway choice. By controlling the length of ssDNA produced during DNA resection, protein neddylation not only affects the choice between NHEJ and homologous recombination but also controls the balance between different recombination subpathways. Thus, protein neddylation status has a great impact in the way cells respond to DNA breaks.     

Hybrid joint formation in human V(D)J recombination requires nonhomologous DNA end joining

In V(D)J recombination, the RAG proteins bind at a pair of signal sequences adjacent to the V, D, or J coding regions and cleave the DNA, resulting in two signal ends and two hairpinned coding ends. The two coding ends are joined to form a coding joint, and the two signal ends are joined to form a signal joint; this joining is done by the nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) pathway. A recombinational alternative in which a signal end is recombined with a coding end can also occur in a small percentage of the V(D)J recombination events in murine and human cells, and these are called hybrids (or hybrid joints). Two mechanisms have been proposed for the formation of these hybrids. One mechanism is via NHEJ, after initial cutting by RAGs. The second mechanism does not rely on NHEJ, but rather invokes that the RAGs can catalyze joining of the signal to the hairpinned coding end, by using the 3'OH of the signal end as a nucleophile to attack the phosphodiester bonds of the hairpinned coding end. In the present study, we addressed the question of which type of hybrid joining occurs in a physiological environment, where standard V(D)J recombination presumably occurs and normal RAG proteins are endogenously expressed. We find that all hybrids in vivo require DNA ligase IV in human cells, which is the final component of the NHEJ pathway. Hence, hybrid joints rely on NHEJ rather than on the RAG complex for joining.