Magnesium is required for specific DNA binding of the CREB B-ZIP domain

We have examined binding of the CREB B-ZIP protein domain to double-stranded DNA containing a consensus CRE sequence (5′-TGACGTCA-3′), the related PAR, C/EBP and AP-1 sequences and the unrelated SP1 sequence. DNA binding was assayed in the presence or absence of MgCl₂ and/or KCl using two methods: circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The CD assay allows us to measure equilibrium binding in solution. Thermal denaturation in 150 mM KCl indicates that the CREB B-ZIP domain binds all the DNA sequences, with highest affinity for the CRE site, followed by the PAR (5′-TAACGTTA-3′), C/EBP (5′-TTGCGCAA-3′) and AP-1 (5′-TGAGTCA-3′) sites. The addition of 10 mM MgCl₂ diminished DNA binding to the CRE and PAR DNA sequences and abolished binding to the C/EBP and AP-1 DNA sequences, resulting in more sequence-specific DNA binding. Using ‘standard’ EMSA conditions (0.25× TBE), CREB bound all the DNA sequences examined. The CREB–CRE complex had an apparent K_d of ~300 pM, PAR of ~1 nM, C/EBP and AP-1 of ~3 nM and SP1 of ~30 nM. The addition of 10 mM MgCl₂ to the polyacrylamide gel dramatically altered sequence-specific DNA binding. CREB binding affinity for CRE DNA decreased 3-fold, but binding to the other DNA sequences decreased >1000-fold. In the EMSA, addition of 150 mM KCl to the gels had an effect similar to MgCl₂. The magnesium concentration needed to prevent non-specific electrostatic interactions between CREB and DNA in solution is in the physiological range and thus changes in magnesium concentration may be a cellular signal that regulates gene expression.     

The GCN4 bZIP targets noncognate gene regulatory sequences: quantitative investigation of binding at full and half sites

We previously reported that a basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) protein, a hybrid of the GCN4 basic region and C/EBP leucine zipper, not only recognizes cognate target sites AP-1 (5'-TGACTCA-3') and cAMP-response element (CRE) (5'-TGACGTCA-3') but also binds selectively to noncognate DNA sites: C/EBP (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein, 5'-TTGCGCAA), XRE1 (xenobiotic response element, 5'-TTGCGTGA), HRE (HIF response element, 5'-GCACGTAG), and E-box (5'-CACGTG). In this work, we used electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and circular dichroism (CD) for more extensive characterization of the binding of wt bZIP dimer to noncognate sites as well as full- and half-site derivatives, and we examined changes in flanking sequences. Quantitative EMSA titrations were used to measure dissociation constants of this hybrid, wt bZIP, to DNA duplexes: Full-site binding affinities gradually decrease from cognate sites AP-1 and CRE with Kd values of 13 and 12 nM, respectively, to noncognate sites with Kd values of 120 nM to low microM. DNA-binding selectivity at half sites is maintained; however, half-site binding affinities sharply decrease from the cognate half site (Kd = 84 nM) to noncognate half sites (all Kd values > 2 microM). CD shows that comparable levels of alpha-helical structure are induced in wt bZIP upon binding to cognate AP-1 or noncognate sites. Thus, noncognate sites may contribute to preorganization of stable protein structure before binding target DNA sites. This work demonstrates that the bZIP scaffold may be a powerful tool in the design of small, alpha-helical proteins with desired DNA recognition properties.     

Dual FRET assay for detecting receptor protein interaction with DNA

We present here a new assay that is based on the idea of the molecular beacon. This assay makes it possible to investigate two proteins interacting with DNA at two binding sites that are close to each other. The effectiveness of the test depends on the exclusive binding of three DNA fragments in the presence of two proteins, and the monitoring of the process depends upon observing the quenching of two independent fluorescence donors. As a model we used the components of the heterodimeric ecdysteroid receptor proteins ultraspiracle (Usp) and ecdysone receptor (EcR) from Drosophila melanogaster and a response element from the promoter of the hsp27 gene. The response element consists of two binding sites (half-sites) for the DNA binding domains (DBDs). We have shown that protein–protein interactions mediate cooperative binding of the ecdysteroid receptor DBDs to a hsp27_pal response element. The analysis of the microscopic dissociation constants obtained with the DMB led to the conclusion that there was increased affinity of UspDBD to the 5′ half-site in the presence of EcRDBD when the 3′ half-site was occupied, and increased affinity of EcRDBD to the 3′ half-site when the 5′ half-site was occupied.     

Determination of protein-DNA binding constants and specificities from statistical analyses of single molecules: MutS-DNA interactions

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a powerful technique for examining the conformations of protein–DNA complexes and determining the stoichiometries and affinities of protein–protein complexes. We extend the capabilities of AFM to the determination of protein–DNA binding constants and specificities. The distribution of positions of the protein on the DNA fragments provides a direct measure of specificity and requires no knowledge of the absolute binding constants. The fractional occupancies of the protein at a given position in conjunction with the protein and DNA concentrations permit the determination of the absolute binding constants. We present the theoretical basis for this analysis and demonstrate its utility by characterizing the interaction of MutS with DNA fragments containing either no mismatch or a single mismatch. We show that MutS has significantly higher specificities for mismatches than was previously suggested from bulk studies and that the apparent low specificities are the result of high affinity binding to DNA ends. These results resolve the puzzle of the apparent low binding specificity of MutS with the expected high repair specificities. In conclusion, from a single set of AFM experiments, it is possible to determine the binding affinity, specificity and stoichiometry, as well as the conformational properties of the protein–DNA complexes.     

The GCN4 bZIP can bind to noncognate gene regulatory sequences

We show that a minimalist basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) hybrid, comprising the yeast GCN4 basic region and C/EBP leucine zipper, can target mammalian and other gene regulatory sequences naturally targeted by other bZIP and basic/helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. We previously reported that this hybrid, wt bZIP, is capable of sequence-specific, high-affinity binding of DNA comparable to that of native GCN4 to the cognate AP-1 and CRE DNA sites. In this work, we used DNase I footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift assay to show that wt bZIP can also specifically target noncognate gene regulatory sequences: C/EBP (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein, 5'-TTGCGCAA), XRE1 (Xenobiotic response element, 5'-TTGCGTGA), HRE (HIF response element, 5'-GCACGTAG), and the E-box (Enhancer box, 5'-CACGTG). Although wt bZIP still targets AP-1 with strongest affinity, both DNA-binding specificity and affinity are maintained with wt bZIP binding to noncognate gene regulatory sequences: the dissociation constant for wt bZIP in complex with AP-1 is 13 nM, while that for C/EBP is 120 nM, XRE1 240 nM, and E-box and HRE are in the microM range. These results demonstrate that the bZIP possesses the versatility to bind various sequences with varying affinities, illustrating the potential to fine-tune a designed protein's affinity for its DNA target. Thus, the bZIP scaffold may be a powerful tool in design of small, alpha-helical proteins with desired DNA recognition properties.     

Combining chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA footprinting: a novel method to analyze protein–DNA interactions in vivo

A variety of methods are available to analyze protein–DNA interactions in vivo. Two of the most prominent of these methods are chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and in vivo footprinting. Both of these procedures have specific limitations. For example, the ChIP assay fails to document where exactly a protein binds in vivo. The precipitation of a specific segment of DNA with antibodies directed against DNA-binding proteins does not necessarily indicate that the protein directly interacts with a sequence in the precipitate but could rather reflect protein–protein interactions. Furthermore, the results of in vivo footprinting studies are inconclusive if a DNA sequence is analyzed that is bound by a specific protein in only a certain fraction of cells. Finally, in vivo footprinting does not indicate which protein is bound at a specific site. We have developed a new procedure that combines the ChIP assay and DMS footprinting techniques. Using this method we show here that antibodies specific for USF1 and NF-E2 precipitate the murine β-globin promoter in MEL cells. DMS footprinting analysis of the DNA precipitated with NF-E2 antibodies revealed a protection over a partial NF-E2-binding site in the β-globin downstream promoter region. We believe that this novel method will generally benefit investigators interested in analyzing protein–DNA interactions in vivo.     

The affinity of different MBD proteins for a specific methylated locus depends on their intrinsic binding properties

The methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) family of proteins was defined based on sequence similarity in their DNA binding domains. In light of their high degree of conservation, it is of inherent interest to determine the genomic distribution of these proteins, and their associated co-repressor complexes. One potential determinant of specificity resides in differences in the intrinsic DNA binding properties of the various MBD proteins. In this report, we use a capillary electrophoretic mobility shift assay (CEMSA) with laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) and neutral capillaries to calculate MBD–DNA binding affinities. MBD proteins were assayed on pairs of methylated and unmethylated duplex oligos corresponding to the promoter regions of the BRCA1, MLH1, GSTP1 and p16^INK4a genes, and binding affinities for each case were calculated by Scatchard analyses. With the exception of mammalian MBD3 and Xenopus MBD3 LF, all the MBD proteins showed higher affinity for methylated DNA (in the nanomolar range) than for unmethylated DNA (in the micromolar range). Significant differences between MBD proteins in the affinity for methylated DNA were observed, ranging within two orders of magnitude. By mutational analysis of MBD3 and using CEMSA, we demonstrate the critical role of specific residues within the MBD in conferring selectivity for methylated DNA. Interestingly, the binding affinity of specific MBD proteins for methylated DNA fragments from naturally occurring sequences are affected by local methyl-CpG spacing.     

Role of ATP hydrolysis in the DNA translocase activity of the bovine papillomavirus (BPV-1) E1 helicase

The E1 protein of bovine papillomavirus type-1 is the viral replication initiator protein and replicative helicase. Here we show that the C-terminal ~300 amino acids of E1, that share homology with members of helicase superfamily 3 (SF3), can act as an autonomous helicase. E1 is monomeric in the absence of ATP but assembles into hexamers in the presence of ATP, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) or both. A 16 base sequence is the minimum for efficient hexamerization, although the complex protects ~30 bases from nuclease digestion, supporting the notion that the DNA is bound within the protein complex. In the absence of ATP, or in the presence of ADP or the non–hydrolysable ATP analogue AMP–PNP, the interaction with short ssDNA oligonucleotides is exceptionally tight (T_1/2 > 6 h). However, in the presence of ATP, the interaction with DNA is destabilized (T_1/2 ~60 s). These results suggest that during the ATP hydrolysis cycle an internal DNA-binding site oscillates from a high to a low-affinity state, while protein–protein interactions switch from low to high affinity. This reciprocal change in protein–protein and protein–DNA affinities could be part of a mechanism for tethering the protein to its substrate while unidirectional movement along DNA proceeds.     

Altered target site specificity variants of the I-PpoI His-Cys box homing endonuclease

We used a yeast one-hybrid assay to isolate and characterize variants of the eukaryotic homing endonuclease I-PpoI that were able to bind a mutant, cleavage-resistant I-PpoI target or ‘homing’ site DNA in vivo. Native I-PpoI recognizes and cleaves a semi-palindromic 15-bp target site with high specificity in vivo and in vitro. This target site is present in the 28S or equivalent large subunit rDNA genes of all eukaryotes. I-PpoI variants able to bind mutant target site DNA had from 1 to 8 amino acid substitutions in the DNA–protein interface. Biochemical characterization of these proteins revealed a wide range of site–binding affinities and site discrimination. One-third of variants were able to cleave target site DNA, but there was no systematic relationship between site-binding affinity and site cleavage. Computational modeling of several variants provided mechanistic insight into how amino acid substitutions that contact, or are adjacent to, specific target site DNA base pairs determine I-PpoI site-binding affinity and site discrimination, and may affect cleavage efficiency.     

An ultra‐high affinity protein–protein interface displaying sequence‐robustness

Protein–protein interactions are crucial in biology and play roles in for example, the immune system, signaling pathways, and enzyme regulation. Ultra‐high affinity interactions (K _d <0.1 nM) occur in these systems, however, structures and energetics behind stability of ultra‐high affinity protein–protein complexes are not well understood. Regulation of the starch debranching barley limit dextrinase (LD) and its endogenous cereal type inhibitor (LDI) exemplifies an ultra‐high affinity complex (K _d of 42 pM). In this study the LD–LDI complex is investigated to unveil how robust the ultra‐high affinity is to LDI sequence variation at the protein–protein interface and whether alternative sequences can retain the ultra‐high binding affinity. The interface of LD–LDI was engineered using computational protein redesign aiming at identifying LDI variants predicted to retain ultra‐high binding affinity. These variants present a very diverse set of mutations going beyond conservative and alanine substitutions typically used to probe interfaces. Surface plasmon resonance analysis of the LDI variants revealed that high affinity of LD–LDI requires interactions of several residues at the rim of the protein interface, unlike the classical hotspot arrangement where key residues are found at the center of the interface. Notably, substitution of interface residues in LDI, including amino acids with functional groups different from the wild‐type, could occur without loss of affinity. This demonstrates that ultra‐high binding affinity can be conferred without hotspot residues, thus making complexes more robust to mutational drift in evolution. The present mutational analysis also demonstrates how energetic coupling can emerge between residues at large distances at the interface.