Overcompensation and adaptive plasticity of apical dominance in Erysimum strictum (Brassicaceae) in response to simulated browsing and resource availability

In the cases where overcompensation has been observed in monocarpic herbs, overcompensation is associated with an apically dominant shoot architecture of intact plants, increased lateral branching following herbivory, and increased reproductive success as a consequence of damage. The compensatory continuum hypothesis expects overcompensation to be more prevalent in resource rich environments compared to poor environments. This is paradoxical since in resource rich conditions the intact plants should branch most vigorously and hence any further increase in branch number should lead to lower seed yield. An explanation could be that apical dominance is rather insensitive to changes in resource availability, and that overcompensation is possible in conditions where plants experience meristem limitation (due to apical dominance) in relation to available resources. We explored the branching patterns and fitness responses of tall wormseed mustard (Erysimum strictum) to simulated browsing, soil nutrients, and competition in common garden. Competition increased apical dominance and reduced plant fitness whereas fertilization had the reverse effects. Simulated browsing increased lateral branching and had little impact on plant fitness. Fitness overcompensation was observed only among plants grown in competition and in the absence of fertilization – the most resource poor treatment combination in the experiment. The results contradict both with the compensation continuum and the assumption that apical dominance shows no or very little plasticity in relation to growing conditions. Because directional selection gradients on branch number were invariantly positive irrespective of growing conditions, we propose that, in spite of phenotypic plasticity of apical dominance, the plants appear to be meristem rather than resource limited, and that meristem limitation is strongest in conditions where intact plants produce fewest lateral branches. Our results deviate from the compensation continuum because resource availability affected compensation ability more strongly through phenotypic plasticity of shoot architecture rather than via changes in resource availability per se.     

Effects of resource availability on tolerance of herbivory: a review and assessment of three opposing models

Although it is widely acknowledged that a plant's tolerance of herbivore damage depends on resource availability in the plant's environment, there is no consensus on whether higher resource levels lead to greater or to lower tolerance. The prevailing model, the compensatory continuum hypothesis (CCH), predicts that tolerance of herbivory should be greater in high-resource or low-competition conditions. The main rival hypothesis, the growth rate model (GRM), makes the opposite prediction: tolerance of herbivory should be greater in more stressful conditions. The tolerance predictions of a recently introduced model, the limiting resource model (LRM), are more flexible and depend on the type of resource and herbivore under consideration. We reviewed 48 studies (from 40 published articles) of plant tolerance of leaf damage in conditions differing in levels of light, inorganic nutrients, water stress, or competition. The results of 31%, 48%, and 95% of the studies were consistent with the predictions of the CCH, GRM, and LRM, respectively. Thus, by considering which resource is primarily affected by herbivory and which resource is limiting a plant's fitness, the LRM offers a substantial advance in predicting how tolerance will be affected by environmental differences in resource availability.     

Applying the limiting resource model to plant tolerance of apical meristem damage

Apical meristem damage (AMD) is a common result of herbivory. AMD can have dramatically variable effects on plant architecture and fitness, ranging from a total loss of reproductive capacity to overcompensation. We explored the influence of environmental stresses and meristem limitation on tolerance of AMD by applying the limiting resource model (LRM) of plant tolerance to 17 previously published studies and a new empirical study on Solidago altissima. In the S. altissima experiment, AMD released axillary meristems from apical dominance, and fertilizer addition enabled plants to take full advantage of the lateral branches. AMD caused a 58% reduction in seed production in nutrient-stressed plants but only a 6% reduction in seed production in fertilized plants. In 12 of the 18 studies reviewed, tolerance was greater in the high-resource (or low-competition) treatment; in two, tolerance was greater in the low-resource treatment; and in four, resource level did not affect tolerance of AMD. The results of 15 studies (83%) were consistent with LRM predictions. Overcompensation was observed in six studies, and it occurred only in the high-resource treatments in five of these studies, as would be expected from applying the LRM.     

Effect of water availability on tolerance of leaf damage in tall morning glory,Ipomoea purpurea

Resource availability may limit plant tolerance of herbivory. To predict the effect of differential resource availability on plant tolerance, the limiting resource model (LRM) considers which resource limits plant fitness and which resource is mostly affected by herbivore damage. We tested the effect of experimental drought on tolerance of leaf damage in Ipomoea purpurea, which is naturally exposed to both leaf damage and summer drought. To seek mechanistic explanations, we also measured several morphological, allocation and gas exchange traits. In this case, LRM predicts that tolerance would be the same in both water treatments. Plants were assigned to a combination of two water treatments (control and low water) and two damage treatments (50% defoliation and undamaged). Plants showed tolerance of leaf damage, i.e., a similar number of fruits were produced by damaged and undamaged plants, only in control water. Whereas experimental drought affected all plant traits, leaf damage caused plants to show a greater leaf trichome density and reduced shoot biomass, but only in low water. It is suggested that the reduced fitness (number of fruits) of damaged plants in low water was mediated by the differential reduction of shoot biomass, because the number of fruits per shoot biomass was similar in damaged and undamaged plants. Alternative but less likely explanations include the opposing direction of functional responses to drought and defoliation, and resource costs of the damage-induced leaf trichome density. Our results somewhat challenge the LRM predictions, but further research including field experiments is needed to validate some of the preliminary conclusions drawn.     

Allometry and development in herbaceous plants: functional responses of meristem allocation to light and nutrient availability

We examined the relationship between meristem allocation and plant size for four annual plant species: Arabidopsis thaliana, Arenaria serphyllifolia, Brassica rapa, and Chaenorrhinum minus. Gradients of light and nutrient availability were used to obtain a range of plant sizes for each of these species. Relative allocation to reproductive, inactive, and growth meristems were used to measure reproductive effort, apical dominance, and branching intensity, respectively. We measured allocation to each of these three meristem fates at weekly intervals throughout development and at final developmental stage. At all developmental stages reproductive effort and branching intensity tended to increase with increasing plant size (i.e., due to increasing resource availability) and apical dominance tended to decrease with increasing plant size. We interpret these responses as a strategy for plants to maximize fitness across a range of environments. In addition, significant differences in meristem response among species may be important in defining the range of habitats in which a species can exist and may help explain patterns of species competition and coexistence in habitats with variable resource availability.     

Grazing tolerance of Gentianella amarella and other monocarpic herbs: why is tolerance highest at low damage levels?

Plants have adapted to compensate for the loss of vegetative biomass and reproductive potential caused by grazing. Shoot damage breaks down the correlative inhibition maintained by apical dominance. The consequent increased branching may lead to increased production of flowers and fruits in damaged plants, provided that enough resources, both in terms of meristems and nutrients, are available. In Gentianella amarella, the removal of the apex of the main stem (10% clipping) had no pronounced effect on branching and plant performance. In one of the two study populations, however, apically damaged plants produced more fruits than undamaged control plants. The plants also fully compensated for 50% removal of the main stem in terms of above-ground biomass, but their fruit production was reduced compared to control and apically damaged plants. After 75% clipping, fruit production was not significantly reduced compared to 50% clipping. Consequently, G. amarella showed highest tolerance in the presence of minor shoot damage. The pattern is qualitatively similar in some other monocarpic species (Gentianella campestris, Erysimum strictum and Rhinanthus minor). Multiple constraints as well as selective forces may shape these compensatory responses: (1) A lack of basal meristems may constrain tolerance of high damage levels. (2) Species with basal meristems may have a potential to tolerate major damage, but a shortage of resources or otherwise unfavourable growth conditions may constrain their compensatory ability. (3) It may be adaptive to have maximum tolerance of low and moderate damage levels if chemical defences reduce the risk of extensive shoot damage as well as the risk of repeated grazing. (4) The compensatory ability of monocarpic species may be affected by selective forces that favour fast vertical growth early in the season and unbranched architecture in undamaged conditions. Therefore, it is not the mere grazing history, but also other factors associated with growth conditions that are required to explain the variation in grazing tolerance.     

Ontogenetic contingency of tolerance mechanisms in response to apical damage

Background and Aims

Plants are able to tolerate tissue loss through vigorous branching which is often triggered by release from apical dominance and activation of lateral meristems. However, damage-induced branching might not be a mere physiological outcome of released apical dominance, but an adaptive response to environmental signals, such as damage timing and intensity. Here, branching responses to both factors were examined in the annual plant Medicago truncatula.

Methods

Branching patterns and allocation to reproductive traits were examined in response to variable clipping intensities and timings in M. truncatula plants from two populations that vary in the onset of reproduction. Phenotypic selection analysis was used to evaluate the strength and direction of selection on branching under the damage treatments.

Key Results

Plants of both populations exhibited an ontogenetic shift in tolerance mechanisms: while early damage induced greater meristem activation, late damage elicited investment in late-determined traits, including mean pod and seed biomass, and supported greater germination rates. Severe damage mostly elicited simultaneous development of multiple-order lateral branches, but this response was limited to early damage. Selection analyses revealed positive directional selection on branching in plants under early- compared with late- or no-damage treatments.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that damage-induced meristem activation is an adaptive response that could be modified according to the plant''s developmental stage, severity of tissue loss and their interaction, stressing the importance of considering these effects when studying plastic responses to apical damage.     

No evidence of a generalized potential ‘cost’ of apical dominance for species that have strong apical dominance

尚无证据表明顶端优势强的物种存在广义顶端优势潜在“成本”     

Fitness consequences of branching in Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae)

The reserve meristem hypothesis proposes that strong apical dominance suppresses lateral meristems and branches to escape from predictable damage (herbivory). This hypothesis was tested for Verbascum thapsus and its seed predator the weevil Gynmnetron tetrum by two mensurative experiments. The following predictions were made under this hypothesis: the proportion of individuals branched within a population will increase with increased damage, the main stalk of branched plants will be more damaged, and branching increases net seed production. Fifty populations of V. thapsus were extensively surveyed, and one pair of similar-sized individuals (branched vs. unbranched) were selected from each population to determine damage patterns and measure seed production. Two of the predictions of the reserve meristem hypothesis were clearly supported. The proportion of fruits damaged on the main stalk of branched plants was significantly greater than unbranched plants, and branched plants produced significantly more seeds. Hence, the reserve meristem hypothesis is supported as an adaptive interpretation of apical dominance in this species. This study is a potential example of overcompensation following granivory in the field.     

Interactive effects of clipping and nutrient availability on the compensatory growth of a grass species

Resource availability is an important factor affecting the capacity of compensatory growth after grazing. We performed a greenhouse experiment with Poa bulbosa, a small perennial grass of the Mediterranean and Central Asian grasslands, to test the importance of nutrient availability for compensatory growth after clipping. We also compared the results with predictions of the limited resource model (LRM). Plants were grown at low and high fertilization levels and subjected to a clipping treatment. Contrary to the LMR, we found that in Poa plants compensatory growth occurred under the high fertilization level, while it did not occur under the low level. The LMR predicts a higher tolerance for grazing in the stressful environment. Our plants showed a significant decrease in their relative growth rates (RGR) after clipping. Although the plants allocated a 32–188% greater fraction of the mass to lamina growth after clipping, this greater allocation to the leaves did not fully compensate for the initial reduction in leaf area ratio (LAR). A sensitivity analysis showed for the clipped plants under the high fertilization treatment, that changes in leaf allocation (f _lam) enabled the plants to compensate for a part of the potential loss caused by defoliation. Probably, the increased biomass allocation comes largely from the bulbs. We conclude that the inconsistency of the LRM with our results originates in the lack of compensatory mechanisms in the model. To better understand how environmental conditions affect tolerance to herbivory, the effects of compensatory growth should be taken into account.     

Tolerance of Gentianella campestris in relation to damage intensity: an interplay between apical dominance and herbivory

Meristem allocation models suggest that the patterns of compensatory regrowth responses following grazing vary, depending on (i) the number of latent meristems that escape from being damaged, and (ii) the activation sensitivity of the meristems in relation to the degree of damage. We examined the shape of compensatory responses in two late-flowering populations (59°20′N and 65°45′N) of the field gentian. Plants of equal initial sizes were randomly assigned to four treatment groups with 0, 10, 50 and 75% removal of the main stalk. The plants were clipped before flowering, and their performance was studied at the end of the growing season. The northern population showed a linear decrease in shoot biomass and fecundity with increasing biomass removal, while the response in the southern population was quadratic with maximum performance at the damage level of 50% clipping. This nonlinear shape depended upon the activation sensitivity of dormant meristems in relation to their position along the main stem. The highest plant performance was achieved by inflicting intermediate damage which induced regrowth from basally located meristems. In contrast, the topmost branches took over the dominance role of the main stem after minor apical damage (10% clipping). Consequently, the breakage of apical dominance is a necessary precondition of vigorous regrowth in this species. However, compensation in the field gentian is unlikely to be a mere incidental by-product of apical dominance. The ability to regrow from basally located meristems that escape from being damaged by grazing may well be a sign of adaptation to moderate levels of shoot damage. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Tolerance of an Expanding Subarctic Shrub,Betula glandulosa,to Simulated Caribou Browsing

Densification of the shrub layer has been reported in many subarctic regions, raising questions about the implication for large herbivores and their resources. Shrubs can tolerate browsing and their level of tolerance could be affected by browsing and soils productivity, eventually modifying resource availability for the caribou. Our objective was to assess the compensatory growth potential of a subarctic shrub, Betula glandulosa Michx., in relation with caribou browsing and nutriment availability for the plants. We used a simulated browsing (0, 25 and 75% of available shoots) and nitrogen-fertilisation (0 and 10 g m⁻²) experiment to test two main hypotheses linking tolerance to resource availability, the Compensatory Continuum Hypothesis and the Growth Rate Hypothesis as well as the predictions from the Limiting Resource Model. We seek to explicitly integrate the relative browsing pressure in our predictions since the amount of tissues removed could affect the capacity of long-lived plants to compensate. Birches fully compensated for moderate browsing with an overall leaf biomass similar to unbrowsed birches but undercompensated under heavy browsing pressure. The main mechanism explaining compensation appears to be the conversion of short shoots into long shoots. The leaf area increased under heavy browsing pressure but only led to undercompensation. Fertilisation for two consecutive years did not influence the response of birch, thus we conclude that our results support the LRM hypothesis of equal tolerance under both high and low nitrogen availability. Our results highlight that the potential for compensatory growth in dwarf birch is surpassed under heavy browsing pressure independently of the fertilisation regime. In the context of the worldwide decline in caribou herds, the reduction in browsing pressure could act synergistically with global climate change to promote the current shrub expansion reported in subarctic regions.     

A comprehensive test of the ‘limiting resources’ framework applied to plant tolerance to apical meristem damage

Tolerance to apical meristem damage (AMD) is a form of plant defense against herbivory. Theoretical models come to different conclusions about the effects of inorganic soil nutrient levels on tolerance to AMD, and different plants have shown different relationships between these variables. To assign some order to these disparate patterns and to resolve conflicts among the models, the ‘limiting resources model’ (LRM) was developed. However, we believe that the LRM is actually comprised of several different models, which we describe. Our study marks the first comprehensive and simultaneous test of the entire LRM framework, treating it explicitly as separate models, which also evaluates the models’ underlying assumptions. We studied tolerance to AMD in laboratory‐reared natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana from three different regions of Europe, spanning a wide latitudinal gradient. We show that, in different populations of this species, basic responses to nutrients and damage are best described by different models, which are based on different assumptions and make different predictions. This demonstrates the need for complexity in our explanations, and suggests that no one existing model can account for all relationships between tolerance to AMD and nutrients. Our results also demonstrate that fruit production can provide a misleading approximation of fitness in A. thaliana, contrary to the common assumption in the literature.     

Interactions between herbivory and resource availability on grazing tolerance of Leymus chinensis

Herbivory and resource interact to influence plant regrowth following grazing, but few detailed investigations on grazing tolerance at population levels are available. We conducted two pot experiments along a simulated grazing gradient (0%, 25%, 50% and 75% of shoot removal) at three water or nutrient levels to determine the interaction of resource and herbivory on Leymus chinensis, a perennial, dominant species in the eastern Eurasian steppes. Interactions between water availability and clipping intensity on the relative height growth rate (RHGR) and bud number were significant. Significant interactions between nutrient and clipping on RHGR, total biomass and specific leaf area (SLA) were also found. Total biomass and bud number, showing a unimodal curve along the clipping gradient in resource-rich environments, were highest at light clipping level, suggesting that this species has the plastic compensatory responses from under- to overcompensation. Interactions between herbivory and water or nutrient were opposite to each other. The “cooperative” interactions between water and herbivory magnified the difference in grazing tolerance of L. chinensis between high and low water treatments. The “antagonistic” interactions between nutrient and herbivory, on the other hand, were reflected in the lower tolerance to heavy clipping in the high nutrient than low nutrient treatments. Results partly support the limiting resource model (LRM). A modified and simplified graphic model of the LRM was proposed based on our results. The new LRM clearly demonstrated that “cooperative” interactions between varying water levels and clipping intensities aggravate the detrimental impacts of herbivores on plant growth and reproduction, whereas “antagonistic” interactions between nutrient and grazing alleviate the negative effects of herbivores. Biomass compensation and density compensation were identified as main mechanisms of herbivory tolerance in this clonal species.     

Branching responses in Silphium integrifolium (Asteraceae) following mechanical or gall damage to apical meristems and neighbor removal

Branching in plants increases plant access to light and provides pathways for regrowth following damage or loss of the apical meristem. We conducted two experiments in an eastern Kansas tallgrass prairie to determine how apical meristem loss (by clipping), apical meristem damage (by insect galling), and increased light availability affected growth, reproduction, and branching in Silphium integrifolium (Asteraceae). The first experiment compared clipping with galling. Clipping increased axillary shoot numbers, while galling increased axillary shoot lengths, reflecting different allocation responses among damage types and inhibition of branching by galls. However, total capitulum production was less in all gall/clip treatments than in intact shoots. The second experiment compared clipping with mowing the surrounding vegetation to increase light availability. Mowing increased total leaf, total capitulum, and axillary shoot length and axillary capitulum production in clipped and unclipped plants and in large vs. small shoots. The presence of the neighboring canopy, not of an intact apical meristem, was therefore the stronger limitation on leaf and capitulum production. These experiments suggest that damage and light competition affected both branching frequency and the partitioning of resources among shoots, branches, and leaves. Because Silphium's growth form is widespread, similar responses may occur in other grassland forbs.     

Herbivory and plant tolerance: experimental tests of alternative hypotheses involving non‐substitutable resources

A mechanistic understanding of the highly variable effects of herbivores on plant production in different ecosystems remains a major challenge. To explain these patterns, the compensatory continuum hypothesis (CCH) predicts plants to compensate for defoliation when resources are abundant, whereas the growth rate hypothesis (GRH) makes the opposite claim of high herbivory tolerance under resource‐poor conditions. The limiting resource model (LRM) tries to reconcile this dichotomy by incorporating the indirect effects of herbivores on plant resources and predicts that the potential for plant compensation is dependent upon whether, and how, herbivory influences limiting resources. Although extensively evaluated in laboratory monocultures, it remains uncertain whether these models can also explain the response of heterogeneous and multi‐species natural plant communities to defoliation. Here we investigate community‐wide plant response to defoliation and report data from a field experiment in the arid and primarily water‐limited Trans‐Himalayan grazing ecosystem in northern India involving clipping, irrigation and nutrient‐feedback with herbivore dung. Without nutrient‐feedback, plants compensated for defoliation in absence of irrigation but failed to compensate under irrigation. Whereas, in the presence of nutrient‐feedback plants compensated for defoliation when irrigated. This divergent pattern is not consistent with the CCH and GRH, and is only partially explained by the LRM. Instead, these pluralistic results are consistent with the hypothesis that herbivory may alter the relative strengths of water and nutrient limitation since irrigation increased root:shoot ratio in absence of fertilization in unclipped plots, but not in the corresponding clipped plots. So, herbivory appears to increase relative strength of nutrient‐limitation for plants that otherwise seem to be primarily water‐limited. Extending the LRM framework to include herbivore‐mediated transitions between water and nutrient‐limitation may clarify the underlying mechanisms that modulate herbivory‐tolerance under different environmental conditions.     

APICAL DOMINANCE AND FORM IN WOODY PLANTS: A REAPPRAISAL

The form of woody plants is commonly interpreted in terms of apical dominance. Trees with the decurrent or deliquescent branching habit are said to have weak apical dominance, whereas excurrent branching is associated with strong apical dominance. A close examination of many decurrent species such as the oaks, hickories, and maples reveals that almost all of the lateral buds on the current year's twigs are completely inhibited. This complete inhibition of lateral buds by definition and common usage of the term is an expression of strong apical dominance. In trees possessing the excurrent branching habit, such as most conifers and some angiosperms, many of the lateral buds on the current year's twigs elongate to varying degrees. This is usually interpreted as an expression of weak apical dominance. The relationship between bud inhibition and form in woody perennials is much more complex than bud inhibition in herbaceous plants because of the time sequence in the formation and release of lateral buds. For example, it is only after a period of rest or dormancy in the decurrent forms that one or more of the uppermost lateral buds are released, and these may outgrow the currently elongating terminal shoot resulting in forking. Conversely, in the excurrent forms, it seems that the initial expression of weak apical dominance enables the terminal leader to outgrow the currently elongating lateral branches so that it exerts complete control over their subsequent growth and development in later years. An examination of the levels of diffusible auxin at different points along the twigs of excurrent and decurrent species indicates that the balance of growth factors at any given locus, and not the absolute quantity of auxin, exerts primary control over bud inhibition and shoot elongation.     

Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants

Research on plant tolerance to herbivory has been so far largely focussed on herbaceous plants partly due to the implicit assumption that woody plants are inherently lower in their compensatory potential as compared to herbs. However, tolerance to herbivory should be an important part of resistance of woody plants because their apparency to herbivory is high due to a large size and long life span, and their defence systems cannot completely exclude herbivory. Moreover, the longer life span, more complex modularity and higher sectorality of woody plants as compared to herbs imply that compensatory responses in woody plants may take several years to develop, and that consequences of herbivore damage to individual modules may profoundly differ from whole-plant responses. Therefore, short-term studies using branches or ramets as experimental units are likely to underestimate the tolerance of woody plants to herbivory. In addition, defoliation by insects (the most common type of herbivory experienced by woody plants) is less likely to release apical dominance and trigger biomass compensation than mammalian grazing on herbaceous plants. We conclude, therefore, that the seemingly different recovery potentials exhibited by woody and herbaceous plants are more likely to be the consequences of differences between the two types of plants in modular architecture, longevity and the type of herbivory they commonly experience rather than indications of inherent differences in compensatory ability. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Plant architecture, sectoriality and plant tolerance to herbivores

The evolution of tolerance is one potential plant response to selection imposed by herbivores. Plant architecture, and in turn, sectoriality may influence a plant's ability to tolerate tissue loss. However, each may either constrain or facilitate a plant's ability to compensate following herbivore attack depending on the plant part damaged and the identity of the damaging herbivore.Plants are limited in their ability to respond to localized damage by chewing insects because carbon does not flow freely from damaged to undamaged plant parts, particularly between branches. Thus, defoliation of individual branches invariably results in decreased growth and reproduction of those branches. Within branches, carbon flow via vascular connections between orthostichies may ameliorate the effects of damage restricted within an orthostichy. Local induction of secondary chemicals to spread damage by folivores throughout a plant's canopy, redistribution of resources within and between IPU's, and delaying reproductive activity until resources have been pooled may all alleviate the constraints on response of plants to grazing.In contrast to the effects of damage by grazers, the metameric construction of plants typically ensures points of regrowth from dormant buds when apical meristems are destroyed either by vertebrate browsers or galling insects. Sectoriality constrains the ability of sap-sucking insects to tap the entire resource base of a plant, thus having a positive effect on plant fitness. However, both the site and timing of attack mitigate the degree of limitation imposed by sectoriality. During peak periods of assimilation, photosynthate flow is mainly over short distances (between sources and sinks within the canopy), and thus sap-sucking insects have a small resource base to draw upon. In contrast, when sucking insects tap into vascular elements in which the flow is from roots to leaves and vice versa, resource availability to the insect (and in turn, potential resource loss from the plant) are only limited by the resources present in those vascular elements.Studies of specific traits in species which demonstrate differential tolerance would greatly add to our understanding of herbivore impacts on plant growth and reproduction. In particular, intraspecific variation in tolerance has been documented for individuals within and among populations with different grazing histories. A number of traits related to sectoriality and architecture probably contribute to such variation in tolerance, and because they are easily manipulated and easily quantified, represent potentially profitable avenues of research. These traits include distribution of leaves and buds, ability to release secondary meristems from dormancy, and the timing of resource movement both before and subsequent to damage.