Prolactin and thyrotropin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in premenopausal women with fibrocystic disease of the breast

Plasma PRL, TSH, total and free T4, total and free T3, and 17 beta-estradiol were evaluated in 29 premenopausal women with well-documented fibrocystic disease of the breast and in 29 healthy matched controls. Plasma PRL and TSH dynamics after acute TRH injection (200 micrograms i.v.) were also determined. All hormonal measurements were performed in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Neither patients nor controls showed any thyroid function impairment. Basal plasma levels of the examined hormones were in the normal range in both groups. When considering data pertinent to PRL and TSH secretory patterns after TRH stimulation, no difference was recorded between patients and controls for TSH secretion, evaluated in terms of maximum peak, net (delta) and percent (delta %) increase above the baseline level and integrated area of response. On the contrary, the response of PRL was significantly higher in patients than controls (maximum peak at 20 min, mean +/- SE, 119.9 +/- 14.1 vs. 60.8 +/- 5.5 ng/ml, p less than 0.001; integrated area of response, 5,725 +/- 908 vs. 3,243 +/- 266 ng/ml/120 min, p less than 0.01). The results are compatible with the view that, in most patients with fibrocystic disease of the breast, there are abnormalities in the control of PRL secretion, which lead to enhanced release of the hormone after stimulation. In such cases the control of TSH appears to be operating normally.     

Serum prolactin levels in women with gross cystic breast disease.

Serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations at baseline and after TRH stimulation were determined in 15 healthy women and in 51 premenopausal patients suffering from Gross Cystic Breast Disease. All women were in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and patients were divided into three groups according to cyst type at presentation. Basal hormone levels were within the normal range in the control group and in the three cystic breast disease groups. The maximum PRL response to TRH stimulation was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with type I cysts (low Na+/K+ intracystic ratio and apocrine epithelium) than in patients with type II cysts (high Na+/K+ intracystic ratio and flattened epithelium), type III cysts (intermediate Na+/K+ intracystic ratio and mixed epithelium) and in normal women. Serum PRL concentrations corresponding to samples obtained 60 and 90 minutes after stimulation remained higher in the first group of patients. These results led us to consider the existence of an altered central regulation of PRL secretion in patients with type I cysts at presentation.     

Hormonal regulation of prolactin release by human prolactinoma cells cultured in serum-free conditions

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulates the prolactin (PRL) release from normal lactotrophs or tumoral cell line GH3. This effect is not observed in many patients with PRL-secreting tumors. We examined in vitro the PRL response to TRH on cultured human PRL-secreting tumor cells (n = 10) maintained on an extracellular matrix in a minimum medium (DME + insulin, transferrin, selenium). Addition of 10(-8) M TRH to 4 X 10(4) cells produced either no stimulation of PRL release (n = 6) or a mild PRL rise of 32 +/- (SE) 11% (n = 4) when measured 1, 2 and 24 h after TRH addition. When tumor cells were preincubated for 24 h with 5 X 10(-11) M bromocriptine, a 47 +/- 4% inhibition of PRL release was obtained. When TRH (10(-8) M) was added, 24 h after bromocriptine, it produced a 85 +/- 25% increase of PRL release (n = 8). This stimulation of PRL release was evident when measured 1 h after TRH addition and persisted for 48 h. The half maximal stimulatory effect of TRH was 2 X 10(-10) M and the maximal effect was achieved at 10(-9) M TRH. When tumor cells were pretreated with various concentrations of triiodothyronine (T3), the PRL release was inhibited by 50% with 5 X 10(-11) M T3 and by 80% with 10(-9) M T3. Successive addition of TRH (10(-8) M) was unable to stimulate PRL release at any concentration of T3. The addition of 10(-8) M estradiol for up to 16 days either stimulated or had no effect upon the PRL basal release according to the cases. In all cases tested (n = 4), preincubation of the tumor cells with estradiol (10(-8) M) modified the inhibition of PRL release induced by bromocriptine with a half-inhibitory concentration displaced from 3 X 10(-11) M (control) to 3 X 10(-10) M (estradiol). These data demonstrate that the absence of TRH effect observed in some human prolactinomas is not linked to the absence of TRH receptor in such tumor cells. TRH responsiveness is always restored in the presence of dopamine (DA) at appropriate concentration. This TRH/DA interaction seems specific while not observed under T3 inhibition of PRL. Furthermore, estrogens, while presenting a variable stimulatory effect upon basal PRL, antagonize the dopaminergic inhibition of PRL release.     

Prolactin release in polycystic ovarian syndrome

To evaluate the prevalence of hyperprolactinemia in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCO), 72 patients with oligo- or anovulation were studied. All of the patients had persisting elevated LH (greater than 25 mIU/ml), normal FSH, high LH/FSH ratio (greater than 2.5), and exaggerated LH responses to LHRH. Mean testosterone and androstenedione concentrations were appreciably increased in these patients. Out of 171 samples for prolactin (PRL) determination from these 72 patients, only 5 patients had a PRL value above 30 ng/ml during the first sampling. The next sampling from these same 5 women disclosed that they were transiently hyperprolactinemic because the next samples showed a normal PRL value. To further investigate the PRL secretory capacity 500 micrograms of TRH and 10 mg of metoclopramide (MCP) were administered to these 72 and 44 patients, respectively. The PRL response to MCP was significantly blunted in these patients compared to normal women while the PRL response to TRH in these patients was not indistinguishable from that in normal women. These results indicate that the true prevalence rate of hyperprolactinemia in PCO may be low rather than high and the association of hyperprolactinemia with PCO may be coincidental rather than a pathogenically related phenomenon.     

Catecholamines and pituitary function. VI. Effect of different dopamine doses on TRH-induced prolactin release in women with pathological hyperprolactinemia

The present study was designed to examine the effect of low-dose dopamine (DA) infusion rates (0.02 and 0.1 microgram/kg X min) on both basal and TRH-stimulated prolactin release in normal and hyperprolactinemic individuals. Sixteen normally menstruating women in the early follicular phase of a cycle and 23 hyperprolactinemic patients were studied. 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA was infused in 8 normal women and 15 patients with pathological hyperprolactinemia, while 8 normal controls and 8 patients received 0.02 microgram/kg X min DA TRH (200 micrograms, i.v.) was administered alone and at the 180th min of the 5-hour DA infusion in all controls and patients. A significant reduction in serum PRL levels, which was similar in normal women (-59.5 +/- 4.0%, mean +/- SE) and hyperprolactinemic patients (-48.2 +/- 5.5) was observed in response to 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA. In normal cycling women DA infusion significantly (P less than 0.02) reduced the PRL response to TRH with respect to the basal TRH test (delta PRL 45.0 +/- 7.0 vs. 77.9 +/- 15.4 ng/ml). On the contrary, the PRL response to TRH was significantly higher during 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA than in basal conditions in hyperprolactinemic patients, both in absolute (delta PRL 91.8 +/- 17.6 vs. 38.4 +/- 6.8, P less than 0.03) and per cent (198.5 +/- 67.6 vs. 32.1 +/- 7.5, P less than 0.02) values. A normal PRL response to TRH, arbitrarily defined as an increase greater than 100% of baseline, was restored in 11 out of 15 previously unresponsive hyperprolactinemic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Gonadotropin, prolactin and thyrotropin pituitary secretion after exogenous dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate administration in normal women.

The effect of exogenous dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHAS) on luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin (PRL) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) pituitary secretion was studied in 8 normal women during the early follicular phase. The plasma levels of these hormones were evaluated after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)/thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation performed after placebo or after 30 mg DHAS i.v. administration. The half-life of DHAS was also calculated on two subjects; two main components of decay were detected with half-times of 0.73-1.08 and 23.1-28.8 h. The results show an adequate response of all hormones to GnRH or TRH tests which was not significantly modified, in the case of LH, FSH and PRL, when performed in the presence of high levels of DHAS. However, the TSH response to TRH was significantly less suppressed (p less than 0.05) (39%) after DHAS administration than during repeated TRH stimulation without DHAS (51%). The data support the hypothesis that DHAS does not affect LH, FSH and PRL secretion, while TSH seemed to be partially influenced.     

Prolactin response to TRH in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

17 obese women were examined, 8 of which were diabetic and 9 affected only by essential obesity. These patients, all of whom had become obese during adult life and 8 control subjects were tested for IRI, GH and PRL levels in basal conditions and after infusion of TRH. In the obese and diabetic women fasting GH values were normal while IRI levels were higher than those of the control subjects. In all cases neither IRI nor GH variations during TRH stimulation test. There was no difference in the plasma levels of PRL between the 3 groups when examined in basal conditions. After TRH the hormone increased considerably in all the subjects. In the obese and diabetic obese women the incremental area did not present different values from those observed in the control subjects. In conclusion in insulin-independent diabetes, as in essential obesity, the pharmacological stimulus did not show any evident alteration of the specific hypofisary receptorial system that regulates the secretion of PRL and GH.     

Prolactin secretion in testicular cancer patients

The role of prolactin (PRL) in testicular function and in its disorders is still obscure. To draw some preliminary conclusions on the relation between the PRL and testis cancer, we assessed the PRL response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (THR) in 15 patients with testicular cancer (8 seminoma; 6 nonseminoma; 1 leydigioma), and in 11 healthy male subjects as controls. The results showed that 5/15 cancer patients gave no PRL response to TRH; 4 of them had a nonseminoma and the fifth a seminomatous testis carcinoma. Patients with nonseminoma had significantly lower mean peak values of PRL after TRH than controls or patients with seminoma. The biological significance of the altered PRL response to TRH in testicular carcinoma has still to be established.     

Oral thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) test in acromegaly

The effects of 40 mg oral and 200 microgram intravenous TRH were studied in patients with active acromegaly. Administration of oral TRH to each of 14 acromegalics resulted in more pronounced TSH response in all patients and more pronounced response of triiodothyronine in most of them (delta max TSh after oral TRh 36.4 +/- 10.0 (SEM) mU/l vs. delta max TSH after i.v. TRH 7.7 +/- 1.5 mU/l, P less than 0.05; delta max T3 after oral TRH 0.88 +/- 0.24 nmol/vs. delta max T3 after i.v. TRH 0.23 +/- 0.06 nmol/l, P less than 0.05). Oral TRH elicited unimpaired TSH response even in those acromegalics where the TSH response to i.v. TRH was absent or blunted. In contrast to TSH stimulation, oral TRH did not elicit positive paradoxical growth hormone response in any of 8 patients with absent stimulation after i.v. TRH. In 7 growth hormone responders to TRH stimulation the oral TRH-induced growth hormone response was insignificantly lower than that after i.v. TRH (delta max GH after oral TRH 65.4 +/- 28.1 microgram/l vs. delta max GH after i.v. TRH 87.7 +/- 25.6 microgram/l, P greater than 0.05). In 7 acromegalics 200 microgram i.v. TRH represented a stronger stimulus for prolactin release than 40 mg oral TRH (delta max PRL after i.v. TRH 19.6 +/- 3.22 microgram/, delta max PRL after oral TRH 11.1 +/- 2.02 microgram/, P less than 0.05). Conclusion: In acromegalics 40 mg oral TRH stimulation is useful in the evaluation of the function of pituitary thyrotrophs because it shows more pronounced effect than 200 microgram TRH intravenously. No advantage of oral TRH stimulation was seen in the assessment of prolactin stimulation and paradoxical growth hormone responses.     

Paradoxical growth hormone response following thyroid-stimulating hormone administration in the polycystic ovary syndrome

Growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) responses after TRH administration were studied in 31 women presenting with the clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic characteristics of the polycystic ovarian (PCO) syndrome; their results were compared with those of 20 normally menstruating women investigated during the early follicular phase of the cycle. Based on the GH responses two PCO subgroups were observed: (a) nonresponders (n = 16) who showed delta max GH responses (0.7 +/- 0.27 ng/ml, x +/- SE) similar to those of the normals (0.97 +/- 0.20 ng/ml), and (b) responders (n = 15), 48.4% of the PCO patients who showed a paradoxical increase in GH levels (delta max GH, 18.0 +/- 1.96 ng/ml) following thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) administration significantly higher than those observed either in nonresponder PCO patients or in normals. Furthermore, basal GH levels were found to be significantly higher in the responder PCO subgroup (5.65 +/- 0.75 ng/ml) compared to either nonresponders (1.58 +/- 0.21 ng/ml) or normals (1.8 +/- 0.18 ng/ml). However, no correlation was found between basal GH levels and delta max GH responses observed. Additionally, basal PRL and delta max PRL levels following TRH administration did not differ either between the two PCO subgroups or those observed in normal controls. delta 4A, T and E2 levels were similar between the two PCO subgroups. No correlation was found between the delta max GH responses to delta max PRL or the post-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone stimulation test delta max luteinizing hormone:follicle-stimulating hormone ratio observed or to steroid levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of triiodothyronine administration on the plasma TSH and prolactin responses to TRH in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary insufficiency.

A study was carried out in 10 patients with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies to determine the response of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and prolactin (PRL) to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and their suppressibility by treatment with triiodothyronine (T3) given at a dose of 60 microgram/day for 1 week. In 3 patients the basal tsh values were normal and in 7 patients, 2 of whom had not received regular thyroid replacement therapy, they were elevated. The response of TSH to TRH was normal in 6 patients and exaggerated in 4 (of these, 1 patient had not received previous substitution therapy and 2 had received only irregular treatment). The basal and stimulated levels of TSH were markedly suppressed by the treatment with T3. The basal PRL levels were normal in 7 and slightly elevated in 3 patients. The response of PRL to TRH stimulation was exaggerated in 2, normal in 6 and absent in 2 patients. The basal PRL levels were not suppressible by T3 treatment but in 4 patients this treatment reduced the PRL response to TRH stimulation. From these findings the following conclusions are drawn: (1) T3 suppresses TSH at the pituitary level, and (2) the hyperreactivity of TSH to TRH and the low set point of suppressibility are probably due to a lack of TRH in the type of patients studied.     

No evidence for association between DRD3 and COMT with schizophrenia in a Malay population

Molecular components of the dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) may play an important role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between DRD3 Ser9Gly and cathechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT, SNP = rs165656) polymorphisms and schizophrenia but the results were inconclusive. We investigated this apparent association between Ser9Gly (A/G) polymorphism and an intronic SNP (dbSNP or rs165656) in 261 Malay patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and 216 controls, using PCR-RFLP. The genotype distribution of the polymorphism DRD3 Ser9Gly was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for patients (P = 0.1251) and out of HWE for controls (P = 0.0137). However, both healthy controls and schizophrenia patients were out of HWE for the polymorphism COMT rs165656. Based on allele and genotype frequencies in both groups, we found no significant association of DRD3 Ser9Gly polymorphisms and COMT (rs165656) with schizophrenia in Malays. Further studies should examine the association between other dopamine-related genes and the behavioral phenotypes of schizophrenia.     

Serum prolactin responses to TRH in recurrent breast cancer patients.

The response of serum prolactin (PRL) to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) was evaluated by radioimmunoassay in 6 normal women and 44 breast cancer cases. They were divided into the following 5 groups: group 1:6 normal women; group 2:10 preoperative patients with early breast cancer; group 3:13 preoperative patients with advanced cancer; group 4:13 postoperative patients with no recurrence of cancer for more than 2 years; group 5:8 postoperative patients with cancer recurrence. The maximum increment of serum PRL levels following the administration of TRH was significantly higher in groups 2, 3 and 5 than in groups 1 and 4. These results indicate that patients with recurrent breast cancer have a higher PRL response to TRH than those without recurrence of cancer.     

Catecholamines and pituitary function. III. Restoration of the prolactin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone by low-dose dopamine infusion in women with pathological hyperprolactinemia

Previous studies in Rhesus monkeys have demonstrated that a dopamine (DA) infusion rate of 0.1 microgram/kg X min induces peripheral DA levels similar to those measured in hypophysial stalk blood and normalizes serum prolactin (PRL) levels in stalk-transected animals. We therefore examined the effect of such DA infusion rate on basal and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-stimulated PRL secretion in both normal cycling women and women with pathological hyperprolactinemia. 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA infusion fully normalized PRL serum levels in 8 normal cycling women whose endogenous catecholamine synthesis had been inhibited by alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT) pretreatment. Furthermore, DA significantly reduced, but did not abolish, the rise in serum PRL concentrations induced by both acute 500 mg AMPT administration and 200 micrograms intravenous TRH injection in normal women. A significant reduction in serum PRL levels in response to 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA, similar to that observed in normal cycling women when expressed as a percentage of baseline PRL, was documented in 13 amenorrheic patients with TRH-unresponsive pathological hyperprolactinemia. However, a marked rise was observed in the serum PRL of the same patients when TRH was administered during the course of a 0.1-microgram/kg X min DA infusion. The PRL response to TRH was significantly higher during DA than in basal conditions in hyperprolactinemic patients, irrespective of whether this was expressed as an absolute increase (delta PRL 94.4 +/- 14.2 vs. 17.8 +/- 14.1 ng/ml, p less than 0.002) or a percent increase (delta% PRL 155.4 +/- 18.9 vs. 17.9 +/- 7.1, p less than 0.0005), and there was a significant linear correlation between the PRL decrements induced by DA and the subsequent PRL responses to TRH. These data would seem to show that the 0.1-microgram/kg X min DA infusion rate reduces basal PRL secretion and blunts, but does not abolish, the PRL response to both TRH and acute AMPT administration. The strong reduction in PRL secretion and the restoration of the PRL response to TRH by 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA infusion in high majority of hyperprolactinemic patients, seem to indicate that both PRL hypersecretion and abnormal PRL response to TRH in women with pathological hyperprolactinemia are due to a relative DA deficiency at the DA receptor site of the pituitary lactotrophs.     

Cyclosporine A inhibits the secretion of certain anterior pituitary hormones in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

To clarify the effects of cyclosporine A (CsA) on the secretion of serum thyrotropin (TSH), prolactin (PRL), luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicular stimulating hormone (FSH), we performed TRH and LH-RH testing in 4 patients with the nephrotic syndrome before and after the administration of CsA, 6 mg/kg/day for 4 to 12 weeks. Prior to CsA all patients responded normally to TRH with respect to TSH and PRL secretion. Two patients showed normal response of LH and FSH to LH-RH stimulation while the response in 2 other patients, who were both menopausal, was exaggerated. By the third or fourth week of CsA administration the basal and peak TSH and PRL values declined significantly in all patients in response to TRH stimulation while those of LH and FSH showed only a modest decrease in response to LH-RH stimulation. Two to 4 weeks after the cessation of CsA the response of TSH, PRL and FSH returned to the pretreatment level. These observations suggest that: 1) CsA exerts an inhibitory effect on the secretion of at least TSH and PRL in humans, and 2) the effect of CsA on the pituitary may be partially reversible after the cessation of the therapy.     

The pituitary-thyroid axis in acromegaly

The pituitary-thyroid axis of 12 acromegalic patients was evaluated by measurement of the serum concentrations (total and free) of thyroxine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3) and reverse T3 (rT3) and thyrotropin (TSH), growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) before and after iv stimulation with thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH). Using an ultrasensitive method of TSH measurement (IRMA) basal serum TSH levels of the patients (0.76, 0.07-1.90 mIU/l) were found slightly, but significantly (P less than 0.01), lower than in 40 healthy controls (1.40, 0.41-2.50 mIU/l). The total T4 levels (TT4) were also reduced (84, 69-106 nmol/l vs 100, 72-156 nmol/l, P less than 0.01) and significantly correlated (P less than 0.02, R = 0.69) to the TSH response to TRH, suggesting a slight central hypothyroidism. The acromegalics had, however, normal serum levels of TT3 (1.79, 1.23-2.52 nmol/l vs 1.74, 0.78-2.84 nmol/l, P greater than 0.10), but significantly decreased levels of TrT3 (0.173, 0.077-0.430 nmol/l vs 0.368, 0.154-0.584 nmol/l, P less than 0.01) compared to the controls. The serum concentration of the free iodothyronines (FT4, FT3, FrT3) showed similar differences between acromegalics and normal controls. All the acromegalics showed a rise of serum TSH, GH and PRL after TRH. Positive correlation (P less than 0.05, R = 0.59) was found between the TSH and GH responses, but not between these two parameters and the PRL response to TRH. These findings may be explained by the existence of a central suppression of the TSH and GH secretion in acromegalic subjects, possibly exerted by somatostatin. Euthyroidism might be maintained by an increased extrathyroidal conversion of T4 to T3.     

Prolactin dynamics in normoprolactinemic primary empty sella: correlation with intracranial pressure

Prolactin dynamic was investigated in 43 premenopausal patients with primary empty sella (PES) diagnosed by pneumoencephalography and CT scan. Only normoprolactinemic patients were included in this study. Basal PRL levels ranged from 4 to 25 ng/ml. PRL responses to TRH (200 micrograms i.v.) and metoclopramide (MCP, 10 mg p.o.) were not significantly different from those in normal subjects, although a trend toward higher responses was present in PES patients. The administration of nomifensine (NOM, 200 mg p.o.) induced a PRL decrease, which was not significantly different from that in normal subjects. However, a sequential stimulation with TRH plus MCP (1 h after TRH administration) induced an exaggerated PRL increase which was significantly different from that in normal subjects. The peak PRL responses after stimulation were not significantly correlated with estradiol levels or FSH/LH ratios in our patients. The influence of body weight was also excluded on the basis of the responses observed in 8 obese control subjects that were significantly lower than in PES patients. Moreover, in 19 patients we studied the intracranial pressure (ICP) through an indwelling catheter inserted into the lumbar subarachnoid space. ICP was normal in 5 patients and elevated in 14 patients. When we compared PRL dynamics in patients with normal or elevated ICP, a significant difference was noted between the percentage of PRL decrease after NOM, that was lower and delayed in patients with increased ICP, suggesting an influence of ICP on neuronal dopamine reuptake. In conclusion, an augmented PRL reserve is present in premenopausal patients with PES. A correlation can be found between ICP and the function of dopaminergic neurons controlling lactotroph cells.     

In vitro release of prolactin by thyrotropin-releasing hormone: influence of dopamine, thyroxine, and cycloheximide.

An acute incubation procedure, using explanted normal rat hemipituitaries pretreated with fresh plasma obtained from pituitary donor animals, was employed to further investigate the in vitro stimulation of prolactin (PRL release by thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH). Pretreatment with dopamine (0.1 microgram/ml) caused a 30-50% decrease in the amount of PRL released into incubation media; the inhibitory effect of dopamine was not reversed by treatment with 0.5-6.0 ng. TRH, although these TRH concentrations consistently stimulated PRL release from pituitaries not exposed to dopamine. Treatment with thyroxine (10(-6) to 10(-5) M) showed a competitive inhibition of thyrotropin release by TRH (0.5 ng), but was without effect on TRH-stimulated PRL release. Cycloheximide (100 microgram/ml) blocked a net increase in PRL levels. TRH, nevertheless, significantly increased PRL release in the presence of cycloheximide. The results indicate that neither dopamine nor thyroxine compete with TRH in causing PRL release, and that the TRH stimulation of PRL release is unrelated to ongoing levels of hormone synthesis.     

Evaluation of GnRH administration on the prolactin response to thyrotrophin-releasing hormone in normal women

To determine whether GnRH modifies prolactin (PRL) secretion in response to thyrotrophin-releasing hormone (TRH) in normal women, a group of eleven normal women, 23 to 40 years of age, was studied in the mid-follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. The PRL response to TRH was evaluated in serum under control conditions and after GnRH infusion. GnRH administration augmented basal PRL release and amplified TRH-induced PRL release. These results suggest that GnRH may be involved in PRL release, partly by increasing the sensitivity of the lactotrophs to TRH.     

The relationship between blood and cerebrospinal fluid prolactin in nonhuman primates

We studied the relationship between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of prolactin (PRL) in repeated and simultaneous samples of blood and CSF from chair-restrained rhesus monkeys. Following administration of thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH), each of 4 monkeys showed increased plasma and lumbar CSF PRL concentrations. Increases in CSF PRL concentrations were muted and delayed until 60 min after peak plasma concentrations were attained. In 3 other monkeys we compared PRL concentrations in simultaneous lateral ventricular and lumbar CSF samples. Although we found no difference in PRL concentrations under baseline conditions, a ventricular-lumbar PRL concentration gradient became apparent after TRH stimulation. These studies demonstrate that changes in plasma PRL concentrations are reflected in CSF concentrations. They suggest that a significant blood-CSF barrier exists for PRL and that PRL may enter the the CSF selectively via the ventricles.