A model for the complex between the helix destabilizing protein GP32 of bacteriophage T4 and single-stranded DNA

A model for the structure of the complex between the helix-destabilizing protein of bacteriophage T4, GP32, and single-stranded DNA is proposed. In this model the bases are arranged in a helix, that is characterized by a relatively large distance between successive bases, a substantial base tilt, in combination with a small rotation per base. This helix is further organized into a tertiary structure, possibly a superhelix, of which the corresponding protein shell corresponds to the relatively rigid and rod-like structure that is observed in hydrodynamic experiments. It is proposed that similar structural features apply to other single-stranded DNA binding proteins in complex with polynucleotides.     

A specific model for the conformation of single-stranded polynucleotides in complex with the helix-destabilizing protein GP32 of bacteriophage T4

The CD and absorption (OD) spectra of single-stranded nucleic acids in complex with the helix-destabilizing protein of either bacteriophage T4 (GP32) or bacteriophage fd (GP5) show similar and unusual features for all polynucleotides investigated. The change in the CD spectra between 310 and 240 nm is in all cases characterized by a considerable decrease in the positive band, while the negative band (if present) remains relatively intense. These changes are different from those due to temperature or solvent denaturation and, moreover, cannot be induced by the binding of simple oligopeptides. Absorption measurements show that all polynucleotides remain hypochromic in the complex. Both CD and OD spectra point to a specific and probably similar conformation in complex for all polynucleotides with substantial interactions between the bases. The spectral properties are almost temperature independent (0–40°C). Therefore, we conclude that the conformation must be regular and rigid. To investigate the relation between these optical properties and the specific polynucleotide structure, CD and OD spectra were calculated for an adenine hexamer over a wide range of the conformational parameters. It appears that the calculated CD intensity is not very sensitive to an increase in the axial increment and that many different conformations can give rise to more or less similar CD spectra. However, simulation of the very nonconservative experimental CD spectrum of the poly(rA)-GP32 complex requires that the conformation satisfies two criteria: (1) a considerable tilt of the bases (? – 10°) in combination with (2) a small rotation per base (?20°) and/or a position of the bases close to the helix axis (dx ? 0 Å). Such conformations can also explain the observed hyperchromism upon binding of GP32 to poly(rA)/(dA). Very similar structural characteristics also account for the optical properties of the complexes with GP5. These are discussed as an alternative to the structure suggested by Alma-Zeestraten for poly(dA) in the complex [N. C. M. Alma-Zeestraten (1982) Doctoral thesis Catholic University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands]. The secondary structure proposed in this work can be reconciled with the overall dimensions of the complex, assuming that the polynucleotide helix is further organized in a superhelix.     

Crystallization of a tryptic core of the single-stranded DNA binding protein of bacteriophage T4

A tryptic core (residues 22 to 253) of the single-stranded DNA binding protein, or gene 32 protein, of bacteriophage T4 has been crystallized in four different crystal forms. One of these forms appears suitable for high-resolution X-ray crystallographic studies. It is triclinic, space group PI, with $\text{a = 67.7}\text{A}\text{?}\text{, b = 67.8}\text{A}\text{?}\text{, c = 66.0}\text{A}\text{?}\text{, α = 101.6 °, β = 107.0 °, γ = 105.2 °}$. There appear to be three protein protomers in a near-rhombohedral packing in the unit cell.     

Mutations of bacteriophage T4 59 helicase loader defective in binding fork DNA and in interactions with T4 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein

Bacteriophage T4 gene 59 protein greatly stimulates the loading of the T4 gene 41 helicase in vitro and is required for recombination and recombination-dependent DNA replication in vivo. 59 protein binds preferentially to forked DNA and interacts directly with the T4 41 helicase and gene 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein. The helicase loader is an almost completely alpha-helical, two-domain protein, whose N-terminal domain has strong structural similarity to the DNA-binding domains of high mobility group proteins. We have previously speculated that this high mobility group-like region may bind the duplex ahead of the fork, with the C-terminal domain providing separate binding sites for the fork arms and at least part of the docking area for the helicase and 32 protein. Here, we characterize several mutants of 59 protein in an initial effort to test this model. We find that the I87A mutation, at the position where the fork arms would separate in the model, is defective in binding fork DNA. As a consequence, it is defective in stimulating both unwinding by the helicase and replication by the T4 system. 59 protein with a deletion of the two C-terminal residues, Lys(216) and Tyr(217), binds fork DNA normally. In contrast to the wild type, the deletion protein fails to promote binding of 32 protein on short fork DNA. However, it binds 32 protein in the absence of DNA. The deletion is also somewhat defective in stimulating unwinding of fork DNA by the helicase and replication by the T4 system. We suggest that the absence of the two terminal residues may alter the configuration of the lagging strand fork arm on the surface of the C-terminal domain, so that it is a poorer docking site for the helicase and 32 protein.     

Nucleotide-dependent binding of the gene 4 protein of bacteriophage T7 to single-stranded DNA

The gene 4 protein of bacteriophage T7 is a multifunctional enzyme that catalyzes (i) the hydrolysis of nucleoside 5'-triphosphates, (ii) the synthesis of tetraribonucleotide primers at specific recognition sequences on a DNA template, and (iii) the unwinding of duplex DNA. All three activities depend on binding of gene 4 protein to single-stranded DNA followed by unidirectional 5' to 3' translocation of the protein (Tabor, S., and Richardson, C. C. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 205-209). Binding of gene 4 protein to single-stranded DNA, assayed by retention of DNA-protein complexes on nitrocellulose filters, is random with regard to DNA sequence. Although gene 4 protein does not bind to duplex DNAs, the presence of a 240-nucleotide-long single-stranded tail on a 7200-base pair duplex DNA molecule is sufficient for gene 4 protein to cause retention of the DNA on a filter. The binding reaction requires, in addition to MgCl2, the presence of a nucleoside 5'-triphosphate, but binding is not dependent on hydrolysis; nucleoside 5'-diphosphate will substitute for nucleoside 5'-triphosphate. Of the eight common nucleoside triphosphates, dTTP promotes optimal binding. The half-life of the gene 4 protein-DNA complex depends on both the secondary structure of the DNA and on whether or not the nucleoside 5'-triphosphate cofactor can be hydrolyzed. Using the nonhydrolyzable nucleoside 5'-triphosphate analog, beta,gamma-methylene dTTP, the half-life of the gene 4 protein-DNA complex is greater than 80 min. In the presence of the hydrolyzable nucleoside 5'-triphosphate, dTTP, the half-life of the gene 4 protein-DNA complex using circular M13 DNA is at least 4 times longer than that observed using linear M13 DNA.     

Immunoprecipitation of SV40 replicating minichromosomes complexed with bacteriophage T4 gene 32 protein.

Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication is a useful model to study eukaryotic cell DNA replication because it encodes only one replication protein and its genome has a nucleoprotein structure ('minichromosome') indistinguishable from cellular chromatin. Late after infection SV40 replicating DNA molecules represent about 5% of total viral minichromosomes. Since gene 32 protein (P32) from bacteriophage T4 interacts with single-stranded DNA and SV40 replication complexes are expected to contain single-stranded regions at the replication forks, we asked whether P32 might be used to isolate replicating SV40 minichromosomes. When nuclear extracts from SV40 infected cells were treated sequentially with P32 and anti-P32 antibodies, pulse-labeled minichromosomes were selectively immunoprecipitated. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis confirmed that immunoprecipitated material corresponded to SV40 replicative intermediates. Protein analysis of the pelleted material revealed several proteins of viral and cellular origin. Among them, T antigen and histones were found to be complexed with at least other three proteins from cellular origin, to the replicative complexes. Additionally, anti-P32 antibodies were able to detect three cellular proteins of approximately 70, 32 and 13 kDa in western blots. These proteins could correspond to those found as part of an eukaryotic multisubunit single-stranded DNA binding protein. The use of P32 and anti-P32 antibodies thus allows the separation of replicating from mature SV40 minichromosomes and can constitute a novel method to enrich and to study replicative active chromatin.     

DNA binding site of the helix destabilizing protein gp32 from bacteriophage T4.

A helix destabilizing protein, the product of gene 32 (gp32) of bacteriophage T4, was subjected to limited proteolysis to produce three types of products with differing affinities for DNA. Previous work has suggested that the 18 amino acids at the N-terminus are required for tight binding to single-stranded DNA (Hosoda &; Moise, 1978). This paper reports the sequence of the N-terminal region and predicts the amino acid residues responsible for DNA binding.     

On the role of the single-stranded DNA binding protein of bacteriophage T4 in DNA metabolism. I. Isolation and genetic characterization of new mutations in gene 32 of bacteriophage T4

Summary The product of gene 32 of bacteriophage T4 is a single-stranded DNA binding protein involved in T4 DNA replication, recombination and repair. Functionally differentiated regions of the gene 32 protein have been described by protein chemistry. As a preliminary step in a genetic dissection of these functional domains, we have isolated a large number of missense mutants of gene 32. Mutant isolation was facilitated by directed mutagenesis and a mutant bacterial host which is unusually restrictive for missense mutations in gene 32. We have isolated over 100 mutants and identified 22 mutational sites. A physical map of these sites has been constructed and has shown that mutations are clustered within gene 32. The possible functional significance of this clustering is considered.     

The DNA binding domain of the gene 2.5 single-stranded DNA-binding protein of bacteriophage T7

Gene 2.5 of bacteriophage T7 encodes a single-stranded DNA-binding protein that is essential for viral survival. Its crystal structure reveals a conserved oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide binding fold predicted to interact with single-stranded DNA. However, there is no experimental evidence to support this hypothesis. Recently, we reported a genetic screen for lethal mutations in gene 2.5 that we are using to identify functional domains of the gene 2.5 protein. This screen uncovered a number of mutations that led to amino acid substitutions in the proposed DNA binding domain. Three variant proteins, gp2.5-Y158C, gp2.5-K152E, and gp2.5-Y111C/Y158C, exhibit a decrease in binding affinity for oligonucleotides. A fourth, gp2.5-K109I, exhibits an altered mode of binding single-stranded DNA. A carboxyl-terminal truncation of gene 2.5 protein, gp2.5-Delta26C, binds single-stranded DNA 10-fold more tightly than the wild-type protein. The three altered proteins defective in single-stranded DNA binding cannot mediate the annealing of homologous DNA, whereas gp2.5-Delta26C mediates the reaction more effectively than does wild-type. Gp2.5-K109I retains this annealing ability, albeit slightly less efficiently. With the exception of gp2.5-Delta26C, all variant proteins form dimers in solution and physically interact with T7 DNA polymerase.     

Mutations in a conserved motif inhibit single-stranded DNA binding and recombination mediator activities of bacteriophage T4 UvsY protein

The UvsY recombination mediator protein is critical for homologous recombination in bacteriophage T4. UvsY uses both protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions to mediate the assembly of the T4 UvsX recombinase onto single-stranded (ss) DNA, forming presynaptic filaments that initiate DNA strand exchange. UvsY helps UvsX compete with Gp32, the T4 ssDNA-binding protein, for binding sites on ssDNA, in part by destabilizing Gp32-ssDNA interactions, and in part by stabilizing UvsX-ssDNA interactions. The relative contributions of UvsY-ssDNA, UvsY-Gp32, UvsY-UvsX, and UvsY-UvsY interactions to these processes are only partially understood. The goal of this study was to isolate mutant forms of UvsY protein that are specifically defective in UvsY-ssDNA interactions, so that the contribution of this activity to recombination processes could be assessed independent of other factors. A conserved motif of UvsY found in other DNA-binding proteins was targeted for mutagenesis. Two missense mutants of UvsY were isolated in which ssDNA binding activity is compromised. These mutants retain self-association activity, and form stable associations with UvsX and Gp32 proteins in patterns similar to wild-type UvsY. Both mutants are partially, but not totally, defective in stimulating UvsX-catalyzed recombination functions including ssDNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis and DNA strand exchange. The data are consistent with a model in which UvsY plays bipartite roles in presynaptic filament assembly. Its protein-ssDNA interactions are suggested to moderate the destabilization of Gp32-ssDNA, whereas its protein-protein contacts induce a conformational change of the UvsX protein, giving UvsX a higher affinity for the ssDNA and allowing it to compete more effectively with Gp32 for binding sites.     

The carboxyl-terminal domain of bacteriophage T7 single-stranded DNA-binding protein modulates DNA binding and interaction with T7 DNA polymerase

Gene 2.5 of bacteriophage T7 is an essential gene that encodes a single-stranded DNA-binding protein (gp2.5). Previous studies have demonstrated that the acidic carboxyl terminus of the protein is essential and that it mediates multiple protein-protein interactions. A screen for lethal mutations in gene 2.5 uncovered a variety of essential amino acids, among which was a single amino acid substitution, F232L, at the carboxyl-terminal residue. gp2.5-F232L exhibits a 3-fold increase in binding affinity for single-stranded DNA and a slightly lower affinity for T7 DNA polymerase when compared with wild type gp2.5. gp2.5-F232L stimulates the activity of T7 DNA polymerase and, in contrast to wild-type gp2.5, promotes strand displacement DNA synthesis by T7 DNA polymerase. A carboxyl-terminal truncation of gene 2.5 protein, gp2.5-Delta 26C, binds single-stranded DNA 40-fold more tightly than the wild-type protein and cannot physically interact with T7 DNA polymerase. gp2.5-Delta 26C is inhibitory for DNA synthesis catalyzed by T7 DNA polymerase on single-stranded DNA, and it does not stimulate strand displacement DNA synthesis at high concentration. The biochemical and genetic data support a model in which the carboxyl-terminal tail modulates DNA binding and mediates essential interactions with T7 DNA polymerase.     

Models for the binary complex of bacteriophage T4 gp59 helicase loading protein: gp32 single-stranded DNA-BINDING protein and ternary complex with pseudo-Y junction DNA

Bacteriophage T4 gp59 helicase assembly protein (gp59) is required for loading of gp41 replicative helicase onto DNA protected by gp32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein. The gp59 protein recognizes branched DNA structures found at replication and recombination sites. Binding of gp32 protein (full-length and deletion constructs) to gp59 protein measured by isothermal titration calorimetry demonstrates that the gp32 protein C-terminal A-domain is essential for protein-protein interaction in the absence of DNA. Sedimentation velocity experiments with gp59 protein and gp32ΔB protein (an N-terminal B-domain deletion) show that these proteins are monomers but form a 1:1 complex with a dissociation constant comparable with that determined by isothermal titration calorimetry. Small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) studies indicate that the gp59 protein is a prolate monomer, consistent with the crystal structure and hydrodynamic properties determined from sedimentation velocity experiments. SAXS experiments also demonstrate that gp32ΔB protein is a prolate monomer with an elongated A-domain protruding from the core. Fitting structures of gp59 protein and the gp32 core into the SAXS-derived molecular envelope supports a model for the gp59 protein-gp32ΔB protein complex. Our earlier work demonstrated that gp59 protein attracts full-length gp32 protein to pseudo-Y junctions. A model of the gp59 protein-DNA complex, modified to accommodate new SAXS data for the binary complex together with mutational analysis of gp59 protein, is presented in the accompanying article (Dolezal, D., Jones, C. E., Lai, X., Brister, J. R., Mueser, T. C., Nossal, N. G., and Hinton, D. M. (2012) J. Biol. Chem. 287, 18596-18607).     

Photoaffinity labeling of T4 bacteriophage 32 protein

With a view toward the determination of nucleic acid binding domains and sites on nucleic acid helix-destabilizing (single strand-specific) proteins (HDPs), we have studied the interactions of the copolymer polynucleotide photoaffinity label, poly(adenylic, 8-azidoadenylic acid), (poly(A,8-N3A] with the T4 bacteriophage HDP, 32 protein. Poly(A,8-N3A) quenched the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of 32 protein in a manner similar to that observed with other polynucleotides, and the effect could be reversed by addition of sufficient NaCl. The binding affinity and site size of this noncovalent interaction of poly(A,8-N3A) with 32 protein are similar to the values obtained for poly(A) and this protein. When [3H]poly(A,8-N3A)/32 protein mixtures were irradiated at 254 nm, fluorescence quenching was not reversed by NaCl, suggesting that the label was covalently bound to the protein. Mixtures of photolabel and protein subjected to short periods of irradiation (generally 1 min, 2000 erg mm-2) formed high molecular weight complexes, which when electrophoresed on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels were radioactive and stained with Coomassie Blue R. Under the same conditions, [3H]poly(A) failed to label 32 protein. The radioactivity of [3H]poly(A,8-N3A)-labeled complexes subjected to micrococcal nuclease after irradiation was seen to migrate just behind the free 32 protein monomer on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, indicating that portions of the photolabel not in direct contact with protein were accessible to this enzyme. By several criteria, we conclude that 32 protein was photolabeled specifically at its single-stranded nucleic acid binding site. Single-stranded nucleic acids with affinities for protein greater than that of poly(A,8-N3A) effectively inhibited photolabeling. The [NaCl] dependence of photolabeling monitored on SDS gels paralleled the NaCl reversal of (noncovalent) poly(A,8-N3A)-32 protein binding. Photolabeling reached a plateau after 1-2 min. The formation of high molecular weight complexes with increasing [poly(A,8-N3A)] paralleled the disappearance of free protein on SDS gels, and reached a saturation level of about 75% labeling. Several chromatographic procedures appear to be useful for the separation of the photolabeled complexes from free protein and photolabel. Limited trypsin hydrolysis of photolabeled 32 protein indicated that all the label was within the central ("III") portion of the protein. This approach should have general applicability to the identification of nucleic acid binding sites on helix-destabilizing proteins.     

Recognition of chemically damaged DNA by the gene 32 protein from bacteriophage T4

We have used fluorescence spectroscopy to investigate the binding of gene 32 protein from bacteriophage T4 to DNA which has been chemically modified with carcinogens or antitumor drugs. This protein exhibits a high specificity for single-stranded nucleic acids and binds more efficiently to DNA modified either with cis-diaminodichloroplatinum(II) or with aminofluorene derivatives than to native DNA. This increased affinity is related to the formation of locally unpaired regions which are strong binding sites for the single-strand binding protein. In contrast, gene 32 protein has the same affinity for native DNA, DNA containing methylated purines and DNA that has reacted with trans-diaminodichloroplatinum(II) or with chlorodiethylenetriaminoplatinum(II) chloride. These types of damage do not induce a sufficient structural change to allow gene 32 protein binding. Depurination of DNA does not create binding sites for the T4 gene 32 protein but nicked apurinic sites are strong ligands for the protein. This T4 single-strand binding protein does not exhibit a significantly increased affinity for nicked DNA as compared with native DNA. These results are discussed with respect to the recognition of DNA damage by proteins involved in DNA repair and to the possible role of single-strand binding proteins in DNA repair mechanisms.     

Single molecule force spectroscopy of salt-dependent bacteriophage T7 gene 2.5 protein binding to single-stranded DNA

The gene 2.5 protein (gp2.5) encoded by bacteriophage T7 binds preferentially to single-stranded DNA. This property is essential for its role in DNA replication and recombination in the phage-infected cell. gp2.5 lowers the phage lambda DNA melting force as measured by single molecule force spectroscopy. T7 gp2.5-Delta26C, lacking 26 acidic C-terminal residues, also reduces the melting force but at considerably lower concentrations. The equilibrium binding constants of these proteins to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as a function of salt concentration have been determined, and we found for example that gp2.5 binds with an affinity of (3.5 +/- 0.6) x 10(5) m(-1) in a 50 mm Na(+) solution, whereas the truncated protein binds to ssDNA with a much higher affinity of (7.8 +/- 0.9) x 10(7) m(-1) under the same solution conditions. T7 gp2.5-Delta26C binding to single-stranded DNA also exhibits a stronger salt dependence than the full-length protein. The data are consistent with a model in which a dimeric gp2.5 must dissociate prior to binding to ssDNA, a dissociation that consists of a weak non-electrostatic and a strong electrostatic component.     

The characterization of a complex of three bacteriophage T4 recombination proteins, uvsX protein, uvsY protein, and gene 32 protein, on single-stranded DNA

Three recombination proteins of bacteriophage T4, uvsX, uvsY, and gene 32 proteins, were examined for the formation of a complex with short single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) molecules containing either 24 or 69 nucleotides. Gel-shift assays revealed that either the uvsX or uvsY protein, when present alone, formed a stable complex only with the 69-mer, while the gene 32 protein bound stably to both ssDNAs. However, a characteristic stable complex formed on the 24-mer when both the uvsX and uvsY proteins were present, and the uvsY protein bound to this DNA in the presence of the gene 32 protein. Isolation of the complexes by centrifugation through a glycerol gradient revealed their protein constituents and showed that the uvsX protein-uvsY protein-24-mer ssDNA complex formed even in the presence of excess gene 32 protein. The possible biological significance of these protein-DNA complexes is discussed.     

A Raman spectroscopic study of the interaction between nucleotides and the DNA binding protein gp32 of bacteriophage T4

Raman spectra of the bacteriophage T4 denaturing protein gp32, its complex with the polynucleotides poly(rA), poly(dA), poly(dT), poly(rU), and poly(rC), and with the oligonucleotides (dA)₈ and (dA)₂, were recorded and interpreted. According to an analysis of the gp32 spectra with the reference intensity profiles of Alix and co-workers [M. Berjot, L. Marx, and A. J. P. Alix (1985) J. Ramanspectrosc., submitted; A. J. P. Alix, M. Berjot, and J. Marx (1985) in Spectroscopy of Biological Molecules, A. J. P. Alix, L. Bernard, and M. Manfait, Eds., pp. 149–154], 1 gp32 contains ≈ 45% helix, ≈ 40% β-sheet, and 15% undefined structure. Aggregation of gp32 at concentrations higher than 40 mg/mL leads to a coordination of the phenolic OH groups of 4–6 tyrosines and of all the sulfhydryl (SH) groups present in the protein with the COO^? groups of protein. The latter coordination persists even at concentrations as low as 1 mg/mL. In polynucleotide–protein complexes the nucleotide shields the 4–6 tyrosine residues from coordination by the COO^? groups even at high protein concentration. The presence of the nucleotide causes no shielding of the SH groups. With Raman difference spectroscopy it is shown that binding of the protein to a single-stranded nucleotide involves both tyrosine and trytophan residues. A change in the secondary structure of the protein upon binding is observed. In the complex, gp32 contains more β-sheet structure than when uncomplexed. A comparison of the spectra of complexed poly(rA) and poly(dA) with the spectra of their solution conformations at 15°C reveals that in both polynucleotides the phosphodiester vibration changes upon complex formation in the same way as upon a transition from a regular to a more disordered conformation. Distortion of the phosphate–sugar–base conformation occurs upon complex formation, so that the spectra of poly(rA) and poly(dA) are more alike in the complex than they are in the free polynucleotides. The decrease in intensity of the Raman bands at 1304 cm^?1 in poly(rA), at 1230 cm^?1 in poly(rU), and at 1240 and 1378 cm^?1 of poly(dT) may be indicative of increased stacking interactions in the complex. No influence of the nucleotide chain length upon the Raman spectrum of gp32² in the complex was detected. Both the nucleotide lines and the protein lines in the spectrum of a complex are identical in poly(dA) and (dA)₈.