Single Slice vs. Volumetric MR Assessment of Visceral Adipose Tissue: Reliability and Validity Among the Overweight and Obese

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with abnormal cardiovascular and metabolic profiles. Total VAT volume of the abdominal compartment by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold-standard measurement for VAT but is costly and time consuming. Prior studies suggest VAT area on a single slice MR image may serve as a surrogate for total VAT volume but it is unknown if this relationship is maintained in overweight and obese men and women. Untreated sleep apnea subjects enrolled into the Icelandic Sleep Apnea Cohort (ISAC) underwent abdominal MRI. VAT area and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) area at the L2-L3 and L4-L5 interspaces and total VAT and SAT volumes were determined by manual examination using image analysis software; 539 men and 129 women with mean ages of 54.1 and 58.8 years and mean BMI of 32.2 kg/m(2) and 33.7 kg/m(2), respectively, were studied. Mean total VAT volume was 40% smaller and mean total SAT was 25% larger among females compared with males. The correlation with VAT volume was significantly larger for L2-L3 VAT area (r = 0.96) compared to L4-L5 VAT area (r = 0.83). The difference in correlation coefficients was statistically significant (nonparametric bootstrap P < 0.001 with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference from 0.11 to 0.15. VAT area at L2-L3 was also significantly better correlated with VAT volume than traditional anthropometric variables. Linear regression analyses demonstrated that L2-L3 area alone was sufficient for predicting total VAT volume and that the nature of the linear association was maintained across all levels of obesity and in both genders.     

Visceral and subcutaneous adiposity measurements in adults: influence of measurement site

Objective: Excess abdominal adiposity is a known risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Computed tomography can be used to examine the visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) components of abdominal adiposity, but it is unresolved whether single‐slice or multi‐slice protocols are needed. Research Method and Procedures: Nine computed tomography scans were obtained in the lumbar spine region of 24 adults. The nine slices were obtained at three intervertebral positions (L2–L3, L3–L4, and L4–L5) and at 7 mm above and below these locations. Intra‐site and inter‐site differences in SAT, VAT, total adipose tissue, and the VAT/SAT ratio were examined using ANOVA and confidence intervals for pairwise differences between means. Results: Intervertebral SAT values increased from 103.1 ± 50.9 (standard deviation) cm² at L2–L3 to 153.3 ± 68.8 cm² at L4–L5, whereas the corresponding VAT values decreased from 164.3 ± 125.4 to 126.0 ± 82.7 cm². The VAT/SAT ratio was not constant, decreasing from 1.8 ± 1.4 to 0.9 ± 0.7. Repeated‐measures ANOVA indicated significant inter‐ and intra‐site differences (p ≤ 0.02) for SAT, VAT, and the VAT/SAT ratio at L3?L4 and L4?L5 (p < 0.001). Discussion: These differences show the limitation of using a single‐slice assessment of abdominal fat distribution, both for a subject and between subjects. Furthermore, the sizeable differences in the intra‐site scans indicate that precise repositioning is needed for longitudinal studies. In summary, our findings suggest that a multi‐site imaging protocol may provide a more complete assessment of abdominal fat stores and distribution than use of a single site.     

A Single mri Slice Does Not Accurately Predict Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Changes During Weight Loss

Earlier cross‐sectional studies found that a single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slice predicts total visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) volumes well. We sought to investigate the accuracy of trunk single slice imaging in estimating changes of total VAT and SAT volume in 123 overweight and obese subjects who were enrolled in a 24‐week CB‐1R inverse agonist clinical trial (weight change, ?7.7 ± 5.3 kg; SAT change, ?5.4 ± 4.9 l, VAT change, ?0.8 ± 1.0 l). VAT and SAT volumes at baseline and 24 weeks were derived from whole‐body MRI images. The VAT area 5–10 cm above L₄—L₅ (A_+5–10) (R² = 0.59–0.70, P < 0.001) best predicted changes in VAT volume but the strength of these correlations was significantly lower than those at baseline (R² = 0.85–0.90, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the L₄—L₅ slice poorly predicted VAT volume changes (R² = 0.24–0.29, P < 0.001). Studies will require 44–69% more subjects if (A_+5–10) is used and 243–320% more subjects if the L₄—L₅ slice is used for equivalent power of multislice total volume measurements of VAT changes. Similarly, single slice imaging predicts SAT loss less well than cross‐sectional SAT (R² = 0.31–0.49 vs. R² = 0.52–0.68, P < 0.05). Results were the same when examined in men and women separately. A single MRI slice 5–10 cm above L₄—L₅ is more powerful than the traditionally used L₄—L₅ slice in detecting VAT changes, but in general single slice imaging poorly predicts VAT and SAT changes during weight loss. For certain study designs, multislice imaging may be more cost‐effective than single slice imaging in detecting changes for VAT and SAT.     

Visceral fat, waist circumference, and BMI: impact of race/ethnicity

Objective: BMI and waist circumference are used to define risk from excess body fat. Limited data in women suggest that there may be racial/ethnic differences in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) at a given BMI or waist circumference. This study tested the hypothesis that racial/ethnic differences exist in both men and women in the relationship of anthropometric measures of body composition and computed tomography (CT)‐determined VAT or subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Methods and Procedures: Subjects included 66 African American, 72 Hispanic, and 47 white men and women, aged ≥ 45. Waist circumference and BMI were measured using standard methods. Total abdominal and L4L5 VAT and SAT were measured using CT. Results: Among both men and women, groups did not differ in waist circumference or BMI. White men had greater L4L5 VAT than African‐American men, and both white and Hispanic men had greater total VAT than African‐American men. Among women, Hispanics and whites had greater L4L5 VAT than African Americans, and Hispanics had greater total VAT than African Americans. The slope of the linear relationship between BMI or waist circumference and VAT was lower in African Americans than in Hispanics and/or whites. Discussion: Middle‐aged and older African‐American men and women had lower VAT despite similar BMI and waist circumference measurements. Altered relationships between anthropometric measures and VAT may have implications for defining metabolic risk in different populations. Different waist circumference or BMI cutoff points may be necessary to adequately reflect risk in different racial/ethnic groups.     

Associations of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with markers of cardiac and metabolic risk in obese adults

Objective : Visceral (VAT) and abdominal subcutaneous (SAT) adipose tissues contribute to obesity but may have different metabolic and atherosclerosis risk profiles. We sought to determine the associations of abdominal VAT and SAT mass with markers of cardiac and metabolic risk in a large, multiethnic, population‐based cohort of obese adults. Design and Methods : Among obese participants in the Dallas Heart Study, we examined the cross‐sectional associations of abdominal VAT and SAT mass, assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and indexed to body surface area (BSA), with circulating biomarkers of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and inflammation (n = 942); and with aortic plaque and liver fat by MRI and coronary calcium by computed tomography (n = 1200). Associations of VAT/BSA and SAT/BSA were examined after adjustment for age, sex, race, menopause, and body mass index. Results : In multivariable models, VAT significantly associated with the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR), lower adiponectin, smaller LDL and HDL particle size, larger VLDL size, and increased LDL and VLDL particle number (p < 0.001 for each). VAT also associated with prevalent diabetes, metabolic syndrome, hepatic steatosis, and aortic plaque (p < 0.001 for each). VAT independently associated with C‐reactive protein but not with any other inflammatory biomarkers tested. In contrast, SAT associated with leptin and inflammatory biomarkers, but not with dyslipidemia or atherosclerosis. Associations between SAT and HOMA‐IR were significant in univariable analyses but attenuated after multivariable adjustment. Conclusion : VAT associated with an adverse metabolic, dyslipidemic, and atherogenic obesity phenotype. In contrast, SAT demonstrated a more benign phenotype, characterized by modest associations with inflammatory biomarkers and leptin, but no independent association with dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, or atherosclerosis in obese individuals. These findings suggest that abdominal fat distribution defines distinct obesity sub‐phenotypes with heterogeneous metabolic and atherosclerosis risk.     

Impact of Race/Ethnicity on the Relationship Between Visceral Fat and Inflammatory Biomarkers

The purpose of this study was to determine whether racial/ethnic differences exist in the relationship between visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and selected inflammatory biomarkers. Subjects included 136 African‐American, 133 Hispanic, and 100 white men and women, aged ≥45. Waist circumference and BMI were measured using standard methods. Total VAT, and VAT and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) at the L4L5 spinal level were measured using computed tomography. Interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), C‐reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen were measured from fasting blood samples. Results revealed that waist circumference and BMI were similar among groups but African Americans had significantly lower L4L5 VAT compared with Hispanics and whites. Despite lower VAT, African‐American men had similar concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers. On the other hand, African‐American women had higher CRP and IL‐6 than white women, and higher fibrinogen than both Hispanic and white women. After controlling for L4L5 VAT, L4L5 SAT, and age, African‐American women had higher concentrations of IL‐6 and fibrinogen. Stratified analyses for CRP indicated that L4L5 SAT was associated with CRP in African‐American and white women after controlling for L4L5 VAT and age, but that the reverse was not true. These data indicate that African Americans had lower VAT but similar or higher concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers. African‐American women consistently displayed greater inflammation compared with whites, even after controlling for VAT or SAT.     

Depot-specific hormonal characteristics of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue and their relation to the metabolic syndrome.

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) imaged by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with the metabolic syndrome features, being morphologically and functionally different from subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Insulin effect is lower and catecholamine effect higher in visceral adipose tissue, with its metabolites and its secretions draining through portal system, partially at least, to the liver. Thus, visceral cells transfer and release fatty acids more extensively, have increased glucocorticoid and reduced thiazolidinedione responses, produce more angiotensinogen, interleukin-6 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and secrete less leptin and adiponectin than SAT. Furthermore, there are regional differences in the intrinsic characteristics of the preadipocytes, with those of SAT presenting greater differentiation and fat cell gene expression but less apoptosis than that of VAT. All features contribute to the morbidity associated with increased VAT. To evaluate the relationship between VAT and components of the metabolic syndrome, 55 non-diabetic women, 11 lean (VAT < 68 cm 2) and 44 obese were studied. The obese with VAT within the normal range (VAT < or = 68 cm 2) had higher BMI, WHR, BP and resistance to FFA suppression during oGTT in comparison to the lean controls. The obese with VAT > 68 cm 2 compared to those with VAT < or = 68 cm 2 had similar body mass index (BMI) but significantly higher in vivo homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA IR ) results and triglycerides. By pooling all data, correlation analysis indicated that VAT contributes more to insulin resistance (HOMA IR ) than SAT does, but not when insulin-suppressed plasma free fatty acids during oral glucose tolerance test as an index of insulin resistance are taken into consideration.     

Lifestyle factors and 5-year abdominal fat accumulation in a minority cohort: the IRAS Family Study

The objective of this study was to examine whether lifestyle factors were associated with 5‐year change in abdominal fat measured by computed tomography (CT) in the Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis (IRAS) Family Study. We obtained abdominal CT scans at baseline and at 5 years, from African Americans (AA) (N = 339) and Hispanic Americans (N = 775), aged 18–81 years. Visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) adipose tissue was measured at the L4/L5 vertebral level. Physical activity was documented by self‐report of vigorous activity and a 1‐year recall instrument. Dietary intake was assessed at follow‐up using a semi‐quantitative food frequency questionnaire referencing the previous year. Generalized linear models, accounting for family structure, were used to assess the associations between percent change in fat accumulation and smoking, physical activity, total calories, polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, protein, and saturated fat intake, percent of calories from sweets, and soluble and insoluble fiber. Soluble fiber intake and participation in vigorous activity were inversely related to change in VAT, independent of change in BMI. For each 10 g increase in soluble fiber, rate of VAT accumulation decreased by 3.7% (P = 0.01). Soluble fiber was not associated with change in SAT (0.2%, P = 0.82). Moderately active participants had a 7.4% decrease in rate of VAT accumulation and a 3.6% decrease in rate of SAT accumulation versus less active participants (P = 0.003 and P = 0.01, respectively). Total energy expenditure was also inversely associated with accumulation of VAT. Soluble fiber intake and increased physical activity were related to decreased VAT accumulation over 5 years.     

Regional Intra‐Subject Variability in Abdominal Adiposity Limits Usefulness of Computed Tomography

Objective: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, the most accurate methods of abdominal fat measurement, have been applied using a number of protocols, ranging from single‐slice area determination to multiple‐slice volume calculation. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of single‐slice CT for abdominal fat area measurement by estimating the intra‐subject variability in abdominal fat areas and comparing the ranking of subjects across four contiguous abdominal levels. Research Methods and Procedures: Nineteen premenopausal women (age, 35.3 ± 1.4 years; mean ± SE) were studied. CT was used to measure intra‐abdominal fat (IAF) area, percentage of total intra‐abdominal area (%IAF), subcutaneous abdominal fat (SAF) area, and IAF/SAF at four adjacent cross‐sectional lumbar levels (L2–L4). Intra‐subject variability (percentage) was defined as SD/mean × 100. Total body fat was measured by DXA, which was further analyzed for central abdominal fat. Results: Mean body mass index was 24.9 ± 1.0 kg/m². The average (range) intra‐subject variability was 28% (8% to 61%) for IAF, 46% (19% to 124%) for %IAF, 26% (14% to 38%) for SAF area, and 19% (7% to 71%) for IAF/SAF. The pattern of this variability was not uniform between subjects, because their ranking by IAF area was markedly different at each CT level. Discussion: We demonstrated significant intra‐subject variability in CT‐measured adipose tissue areas across four predetermined sites. This resulted in a difference in the ordering of subjects by IAF at each of the four imaging sites, suggesting that the usefulness of single‐slice CT in the assessment of abdominal adiposity in premenopausal women may be limited, particularly when performed for the purpose of making comparisons between subjects based on abdominal fat area.     

Dual-energy X-ray performs as well as clinical computed tomography for the measurement of visceral fat

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with adverse health effects including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. We developed a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of visceral adipose tissue (DXA-VAT) as a low cost and low radiation alternative to computed tomography (CT). DXA-VAT was compared to VAT assessed using CT by an expert reader (E-VAT). In addition, the same CT slice was also read by a clinical radiographer (C-VAT) and a best-fit anthropomorphic and demographic VAT model (A-VAT) was developed. Whole body DXA, CT at L4-L5, and anthropometry were measured on 272 black and white South African women (age 29 ± 8 years, BMI 28 ± 7 kg/m(2), waist circumference (WC) 89 ± 16 cm). Approximately one-half of the dataset (n = 141) was randomly selected and used as a training set for the development of DXA-VAT and A-VAT, which were then used to estimate VAT on the remaining 131 women in a blinded fashion. DXA-VAT (r = 0.93, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 16 cm(2)) and C-VAT (r = 0.93, SEE = 16 cm(2)) were strongly correlated to E-VAT. These correlations with E-VAT were significantly stronger (P < 0.001) than the correlations of individual anthropometry measurements and the A-VAT model (WC + age, r = 0.79, SEE = 27 cm(2)). The inclusion of anthropometric and demographic measurements did not substantially improve the correlation between DXA-VAT and E-VAT. DXA-VAT performed as well as a clinical read of VAT from a CT scan and better than anthropomorphic and demographic models.     

Circulating levels of persistent organic pollutants in relation to visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue by abdominal MRI

Objective:

We and others have shown relationships between circulating levels of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and different measures of obesity in both cross‐sectional and prospective studies. Since viscerally located fat seems to be the most harmful type, we investigated whether plasma POP levels were more closely related to visceral adipose tissue (VAT) than to subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT).

Design and Methods:

Thousand hundred and sixteen subjects aged 70 years were investigated in the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study; 23 POPs were analyzed using high‐resolution gas chromatography/high‐resolution mass spectrometry. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging, measuring VAT and SAT, respectively, was performed in a representative subsample of 287 subjects.

Results:

The less chlorinated polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners (105 and 118), and the pesticides dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), and trans‐nonachlordane (TNC) were positively related to both VAT and SAT, whereas the more highly chlorinated PCBs (153, 156, 157, 169, 170, 180, 194, 206, and 209) were inversely related to both VAT and SAT. PCB189 was related to the VAT/SAT ratio in an inverted U‐shaped manner (P = 0.0008).

Conclusions:

In conclusion, the results were in accordance with our previous studies using waist circumference and fat mass as obesity measure. However, the novel finding that PCB189 was related to the VAT/SAT ratio deserves further investigation since exposure to this PCB congener, which has previously been linked to diabetes development, might thereby play a role in the distribution of abdominal adipose tissue.     

Ethnic and sex differences in visceral,subcutaneous, and total body fat in children and adolescents

Objective: This study investigated ethnic and sex differences in the distribution of fat during childhood and adolescence. Design and Methods : A cross‐sectional sample (n = 382), aged 5–18 years, included African American males (n = 84), White males (n = 96), African American females (n = 118), and White females (n = 84). Measures for total body fat (TBF) mass and abdominal adipose tissue (total volume and L4‐L5 cross‐sectional area) for both subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) depots were assessed by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance image, respectively. Analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) were used to determine ethnic and sex differences in TBF (adjusted for age) and ethnic and sex differences in SAT and VAT (adjusted for both age and TBF). Results: Age‐adjusted TBF was greater in African Americans (P = 0.017) and females (P < 0.0001) compared with Whites and males, respectively. In age‐ and TBF‐adjusted ANCOVAs, no differences were found in the SAT. The VAT volume was, however, greater in Whites (P < 0.0001) and males (P < 0.0001) compared with African Americans and females, respectively. Similar patterns were observed in SAT and VAT area at L4‐L5. Conclusions: The demonstrated ethnic and sex differences are important confounders in the prevalence of obesity and in the assignment of disease risk in children and adolescents.     

Adipose tissue R2* signal is increased in subjects with obesity: A preliminary MRI study

Objective : Circulating and adipose tissue markers of iron overload are increased in subjects with obesity. The aim is to study iron signals in adipose tissue. Methods: Adipose tissue R2* values and hepatic iron concentration (HIC) were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 23 middle‐aged subjects with obesity and 20 subjects without obesity. Results: Subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) R2* were increased in subjects with obesity (P = 0.004 and P = 0.008) and correlated significantly and positively with HIC in all subjects. Strikingly, most of the associations of liver iron with metabolic parameters were replicated with SAT and VAT R2*. BMI, waist circumference, fat mass, HOMA value, and C‐reactive protein positively correlated with HIC and SAT and VAT R2*. BMI or percent fat mass (but not insulin resistance) contributed independently to 26.8‐34.8% of the variance in sex‐ and age‐adjusted SAT or VAT R2* (β > 0.40, P < 0.005). Within subjects with obesity, total cholesterol independently contributed to 14.8% of sex‐ and age‐adjusted VAT iron variance (β = 0.50, P = 0.025). Conclusions: Increased R2* in adipose tissue, which might indicate iron content, runs in parallel to liver iron stores of subjects with obesity. VAT iron seems also associated with serum cholesterol within subjects with obesity.     

Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity.

A number of methods exist for the estimation of abdominal obesity, ranging from waist-to-hip ratio to computed tomography (CT). Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was originally used to measure bone density and total body composition, recent improvements in software allow it to determine abdominal fat mass. Sixty-five men and women aged 18-72 yr participated in a series of studies to examine the validity and reliability of the DXA to accurately measure abdominal fat. Total body fat and abdominal regional fat were measured by DXA using a Lunar DPX-IQ. Multislice CT scans were performed between L1 and L4 vertebral bodies (region of interest) using a Picker PQ5000 CT scanner, and volumetric analyses were carried out on a Voxel Q workstation. Both abdominal total tissue mass (P = 0.02) and abdominal fat mass (P < 0.0001) in the L1-L4 region of interest were significantly lower as measured by DXA compared with multislice CT. However, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good concordance between DXA and CT for abdominal total tissue mass (i.e., limits of agreement = -1.56-2.54 kg) and fat mass (i.e., limits of agreement = -0.40-1.94 kg). DXA also showed excellent reliability among three different operators to determine total, fat, and lean body mass in the L1-L4 region of interest (intraclass correlations, R = 0.94, 0.97, and 0.89, respectively). In conclusion, the DXA L1-L4 region of interest compared with CT proved to be both reliable and accurate method to determine abdominal obesity.     

Assessment of Abdominal Fat Compartments Using DXA in Premenopausal Women From Anorexia Nervosa to Morbid Obesity

Objective: To test a newly developed dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) method for abdominal fat depot quantification in subjects with anorexia nervosa (AN), normal weight, and obesity using CT as a gold standard. Design and Methods: 135 premenopausal women (overweight/obese: n = 89, normal‐weight: n = 27, AN: n = 19); abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and total adipose tissue (TAT) areas determined on CT and DXA. Results: There were strong correlations between DXA and CT measurements of abdominal fat compartments in all groups with the strongest correlation coefficients in the normal‐weight and overweight/obese groups. Correlations of DXA and CT VAT measurements were strongest in the obese group and weakest in the AN group. DXA abdominal fat depots were higher in all groups compared to CT, with the largest % mean difference in the AN group and smallest in the obese group. Conclusion: A new DXA technique is able to assess abdominal fat compartments including VAT in premenopausal women across a large weight spectrum. However, DXA measurements of abdominal fat were higher than CT, and this percent bias was most pronounced in the AN subjects and decreased with increasing weight, suggesting that this technique may be more useful in obese individuals.     

Subdivisions of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue and insulin resistance

Whereas truncal (central) adiposity is strongly associated with the insulin resistant metabolic syndrome, it is uncertain whether this is accounted for principally by visceral adiposity (VAT). Several recent studies find as strong or stronger association between subcutaneous abdominal adiposity (SAT) and insulin resistance. To reexamine the issue of truncal adipose tissue depots, we performed cross-sectional abdominal computed tomography, and we undertook the novel approach of partitioning SAT into the plane superficial to the fascia within subcutaneous adipose tissue (superficial SAT) and that below this fascia (deep SAT), as well as measurement of VAT. Among 47 lean and obese glucose-tolerant men and women, insulin-stimulated glucose utilization, measured by euglycemic clamp, was strongly correlated with both VAT and deep SAT (r = -0.61 and -0.64, respectively; both P < 0.001), but not with superficial SAT (r = -0.29, not significant). Also, VAT and deep SAT followed a highly congruent pattern of associations with glucose and insulin area under the curve (75-g oral glucose tolerance test), mean arterial blood pressure, apoprotein-B, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride. Superficial SAT had markedly weaker association with all these parameters and instead followed the pattern observed for thigh subcutaneous adiposity. We conclude that there are two functionally distinct compartments of adipose tissue within abdominal subcutaneous fat and that the deep SAT has a strong relation to insulin resistance.     

Measurements of total and regional body composition in preschool children: A comparison of MRI,DXA, and anthropometric data

Objective:

There are clear sex differences in the distribution of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in adults, with males having more VAT and less SAT than females. This study assessed whether these differences between the sexes were already present in preschool children. It also evaluated which measures of body composition were most appropriate for assessing abdominal obesity in this age group.

Design and Methods:

One‐hundred and five children (57 boys and 48 girls) participated in the study. Body composition was measured using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). Weight, height, and waist circumference (WC) were also recorded. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the entire abdomen using sixteen 10‐mm‐thick T₁‐weighted slices was performed in a subgroup of 48 children (30 boys and 18 girls); SAT and VAT volumes were measured using semiautomated segmentation.

Results:

Boys had significantly more VAT than girls (0.17 versus 0.10 l, P < 0.001). Results showed that VAT correlated significantly with all measurements of anthropometry (P < 0.01) after adjusting for SAT and for total fat mass measured with DXA. The mean limits of agreement between DXA and MRI regarding truncal FM were calculated to be ?11.4 (range ?17.8 to ?3.6), using a Bland–Altman plot.

Conclusion:

Sex differences in adipose tissue distribution are apparent at an early age. MRI is the best method with which to study abdominal fat distribution in young children.

     

Subcutaneous Abdominal Adipose Tissue Subcompartments: Potential Role in Rosiglitazone Effects

Abdominal visceral tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), comprised of superficial‐SAT (sSAT) and deep‐SAT (dSAT), are metabolically distinct. The antidiabetic agents thiazolidinediones (TZDs), in addition to their insulin‐sensitizing effects, redistribute SAT suggesting that TZD action involves adipose tissue depot‐specific regulation. We investigated the expression of proteins key to adipocyte metabolism on differentiated first passage (P1) preadipocytes treated with rosiglitazone, to establish a role for the diverse depots of abdominal adipose tissue in the insulin‐sensitizing effects of TZDs. Adipocytes and preadipocytes were isolated from sSAT, dSAT, and VAT samples obtained from eight normal subjects. Preadipocytes (P1) left untreated (U) or treated with a classic differentiation cocktail (DI) including rosiglitazone (DIR) for 9 days were evaluated for strata‐specific differences in differentiation including peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐γ (PPAR‐γ) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) expression, insulin sensitivity via adiponectin and glucose transport‐4 (GLUT4), glucocorticoid metabolism with 11β‐hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type‐1 (11βHSD1), and alterations in the adipokine leptin. While depot‐specific differences were absent with the classic differentiation cocktail, with rosiglitazone sSAT had the most potent response followed by dSAT, whereas VAT was resistant to differentiation. With rosiglitazone, universal strata effects were observed for PPAR‐γ, LPL, and leptin, with VAT in all cases expressing significantly lower basal expression levels. Clear dSAT‐specific changes were observed with decreased intracellular GLUT4. Specific sSAT alterations included decreased 11βHSD1 whereas secreted adiponectin was potently upregulated in sSAT with respect to dSAT and VAT. Overall, the subcompartments of SAT, sSAT, and dSAT, appear to participate in the metabolic changes that arise with rosiglitazone administration.     

Measurement Site and the Association Between Visceral and Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue With Metabolic Risk in Women

The associations between visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT) and metabolic risk may be influenced by measurement site. The aim of this study was to compare the strength of the associations between VAT and ASAT, as assessed by a cross‐sectional image (area) or total volume, and prevalent metabolic syndrome (MetS). We also examined the association between changes in abdominal AT area and volume with concomitant changes in metabolic risk. Abdominal AT volume and areas were derived using ～35 continuous computed tomography (CT) images from T10–T11 to L5–S1 in overweight or obese postmenopausal women before (n = 67) and after (n = 39) a 6‐month exercise intervention. At baseline, measurement site did not influence the inter‐relationship between ASAT area and total volume, and between ASAT and MetS. Conversely, VAT areas at L1–L2 and L2–L3 were stronger correlates of VAT volume at baseline (L1–L2 (r = 0.94), L2–L3 (r = 0.95), L4–L5 (r = 0.89)) and changes therein (L1–L2 (r = 0.77), L2–L3 (r = 0.75), L4–L5 (r = 0.55)) as compared to L4–L5, but were not significantly better predictors of MetS as compared to L4–L5 or the total volume (L2–L3: odds ratio (OR) = 2.68 (1.6–4.4), L1–L2: OR = 1.88 (1.2–3.0), L4–L5: OR = 2.56 (1.6–4.1), volume: OR = 2.07 (1.1–3.8)). Changes in VAT and ASAT were not associated with changes in MetS (P > 0.10). Although measurement site has an impact on the prediction of VAT volume, this does not translate into an improved prediction for the MetS. Thus, there is not enough evidence to support changing the current research practice of assessing VAT volume or at L4–L5 for the prediction of metabolic risk.     

Breast Volume is an Independent Predictor of Visceral and Ectopic Fat in Premenopausal Women

It is suggested that a large breast size among women may predict type 2 diabetes risk independent of BMI and waist circumference (WC). The purpose of this study was to determine the independent associations of breast volume with cardiometabolic risk factors and regional fat distribution. A total of 92 overweight or obese premenopausal women (age = 39.9 ± 6.8 years) underwent full‐body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of breast volume, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal and lower‐body subcutaneous AT (SAT), and intermuscular AT (IMAT), a 2‐h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and fasting phlebotomy for assessment of triglyceride, total, high‐density lipoprotein–, and low‐density lipoprotein–cholesterol levels. Breast volume was not associated with any of the cardiometabolic risk factors assessed (P > 0.05). However, VAT was consistently associated with a number of cardiometabolic risk factors (OGTT glucose, OGTT insulin, and triglyceride levels) after controlling for age, BMI, WC, breast volume, and the other AT depots. In univariate models, breast volume was positively associated with VAT, IMAT, and abdominal and lower‐body SAT (P < 0.05). After controlling for age, BMI, and WC level, breast volume remained positively associated with VAT and IMAT (P < 0.05), such that women with the highest breast volume had ～1.1 and 1.3 kg more VAT and IMAT, respectively, but no more abdominal or lower‐body SAT, by comparison to women with the smallest breast volume. Thus, the previously documented association between breast size and type 2 diabetes risk may be in part explained by excess VAT and/or IMAT deposition.