Analysis of morphogenesis and keratinization in transfilter recombinants of feather-forming skin

The relationships between feather morphogenesis, histogenesis, and biochemical differentiation were examined by recombining backskin epidermis and dermis, from chick embryos (Hamburger-Hamilton stages 27-31), with an intervening Nucleopore filter (pore size of 0.4 micron). The filter inhibited normal feather morphogenesis and histogenesis of barb ridges, yet feather-like filaments, which were free of dermal cells, formed from the epidermal cells. Using indirect immunofluorescence, with antiserum against alpha- and beta-keratins, the biochemical differentiation of the feather-like filaments was compared to normal feathers. In the feather-like filaments resulting from tissues of stages 27-29, cells containing beta keratins were occasionally seen at the periphery of the filaments, yet cells containing alpha-keratins were inappropriately located throughout the filaments. In a few feather-like filaments on recombinants resulting from tissues of stages 29.5-31, cells positive for beta-keratins were found in the center of the filament, but again alpha-keratins were also found. Surrounding these cells there were several layers of cells, arranged circumferentially, resembling sheath cells. Some sheath-like cells contained beta-keratins. We conclude that although feather epidermal cells, which are separated from their dermis by a Nuclepore filter, can undergo limited morphogenesis and the production of alpha- and beta-keratins, normal feather morphogenesis, histogenesis, and biochemical differentiation require the intimate associations of epidermis and dermis.     

Region-specific deposition of dermal proteins between dermis and epidermis during induction of chick feather and scale rudiments

To begin to study the role of particular proteins in inductive tissue interactions, we have used density labelling techniques to determine whether any dermal proteins are found between embryonic chick dermis and epidermis at a stage when the dermis plays an important inductive role in epidermal differentiation. Epidermis will form feathers or scales depending on whether it interacts with dorsal or foot dermis, respectively, and the dermis can still influence epidermal differentiation when direct cell contact between the tissues is blocked by a membrane filter during culturing (Peterson & Grainger, 1985). In transfilter experiments, we detect a subset of dermal proteins within the filter between the tissues. Several of these dermal proteins are deposited in a region-specific manner, that is, they are only found associated with filters from either dorsal or foot dermis. We have previously shown that the expression of some of these proteins is specific to particular regions of dermis and is also associated with the inductive potential of the dermis (Peterson & Grainger, 1986). We detect only 17 dermal proteins which are transferred across the filter in these cultures and found in direct association with epidermis; of these 14 are common to both dorsal and foot dermis, and 3 are deposited in a region-specific manner. Our results lead us to hypothesize a significant function for certain dermal proteins in this inductive interaction either as part of the extracellular matrix or in direct association with epidermis.     

How and when the regional competence of chick epidermis is established: feathers vs. scutate and reticulate scales, a problem en route to a solution

Most of the chick body is covered with feathers, while the tarsometatarsus and the dorsal face of the digits form oblong overlapping scales (scuta) and the plantar face rounded nonoverlapping scales (reticula). Feathers and scuta are made of beta-keratins, while the epidermis of reticula and inter-appendage or apteria (nude regions) express a-keratins. These regional characteristics are determined in skin precursors and require an epidermal FGF-like signal to be expressed. Both the initiation of appendages, their outline and pattern depend on signals from the dermis, while their asymmetry and outgrowth depend on epidermal competence. For example, the plantar dermis of the central foot pad induces reticula in a plantar or feathers in an apteric epidermis, in a hexagonal pattern starting from the medial point. By manipulating Shh levels in the epidermis, the regional appendage type can be changed from scuta or reticula to feather, whereas the inhibition of Wnt7a, together with a downregulation of Shh gives rise to reticula and in extreme cases, apteria. During morphogenesis of plantar skin, the epidermal expression of En-1, acting as a repressor both of Wnt7a and Shh, is linked to the formation of reticula. Finally, in birds, the complex formation of feathers, which can be easily triggered, even in the extra-embryonic somatopleure, may result from a basic genetic program, whereas the simple formation of scales appears secondarily derived, as requiring a partial (scuta) or total (reticula) inhibition of epidermal outgrowth and beta-keratin gene expression, an inhibition lost for the scuta in the case of feathered feet breeds.     

Avian scale development. XIII. Epidermal germinative cells are committed to appendage-specific differentiation and respond to patterned cues in the dermis.

The ability of the germinative cell population of scutate scale epidermis to continue to generate cells that undergo their appendage-specific differentiation (beta stratum formation), when associated with foreign dermis, was examined. Tissue recombination experiments were carried out which placed anterior metatarsal epidermis (scutate scale forming region) from normal 15-day chick embryos with either the anterior metatarsal dermis from 15-day scaleless (sc/sc) embryos or the dermis from the metatarsal footpad (reticulate scale forming region) of 15-day normal embryos. Neither of these dermal tissues are able to induce beta stratum formation in the simple ectodermal epithelium of the chorion, however, the footpad dermis develops an appendage-specific pattern during morphogenesis of the reticulate scales, while the sc/sc dermis does not. Morphological and immunohistological criteria were used to assess appendage-specific epidermal differentiation in these recombinants. The results show that the germinative cell population of the 15-day scutate scale epidermis is committed to generating suprabasal cells that follow their appendage-specific pathways of histogenesis and terminal differentiation. Of significance is the observation that the expression of this determined state occurred only when the epidermis differentiated in association with the footpad dermis, not when it was associated with the sc/sc dermis. The consistent positioning of the newly generated beta strata to the apical regions of individual reticulate-like appendages demonstrates that the dermal cues necessary for terminal epidermal differentiation are present in a reticulate scale pattern. The observation that beta stratum formation is completely missing in the determined scutate scale epidermis when associated with the sc/sc dermis adds to our understanding of the sc/sc defect. The present data support the conclusion of earlier studies that the anterior metatarsal dermis from 15-day sc/sc embryos lacks the ability to induce beta stratum formation in a foreign epithelium. In addition, these observations evoke the hypothesis that the sc/sc dermis either lacks the cues (generated during scutate and reticulate scale morphogenesis) necessary for terminal differentiation of the determined scutate scale epidermis or inhibits the generation of a beta stratum.     

Avian scale development. IX. Scale formation by scaleless (sc/sc) epidermis under the influence of normal scale dermis

Unlike normal scutate scales whose outer and inner epidermal surfaces elaborate β (β-keratins) and α (α-keratins) strata, respectively, the scaleless mutant's anterior metatarsal epidermis remains flat and elaborates only an α stratum. Reciprocal epidermal-dermal recombinations of presumptive scale tissues from normal and mutant embryos have demonstrated that the scaleless defect is expressed only by the epidermis. In fact, the scaleless anterior metatarsal epidermis is unable to undergo placode formation. More recently, it has been determined that the absence of epidermal placode morphogenesis into a definitive scale ridge actually results in the establishment of a scale dermis which is incapable of inducing the outer and inner epidermal surfaces of scutate scales. Can the initial genetic defect in the scaleless anterior metatarsal epidermis be overcome by replacing the defective dermis with a normal scutate scale dermis, i.e., a dermis with scale ridges already present? Or, are the genes involved in the production of a β stratum regulated by events directly associated with morphogenesis of the epidermal placode? In the present study, we combined scaleless anterior metatarsal epidermis (stages 36 to 42) with normal scutate scale dermis (stage 40, 41, or 42) old enough to have acquired its scutate scale-inducing ability. After 7 days of growth as chorioallantoic membrane grafts, we observed grossly and histologically, typical scutate scales in these recombinant grafts. Electron microscopic and electrophoretic analyses have verified that these recombinant scales are true scutate scales. The scaleless mutation, known to be expressed initially by the anterior metatarsal epidermis, can be overcome by exposing this epidermis to appropriate inductive cues, i.e., cues that direct the differentiation of the outer and inner epidermal surfaces of the scutate scales and the production of specific structural proteins. We have determined that the time between stages 38 and 39 is the critical period during which the normal scutate scale dermis acquires these inductive abilities.     

The specification of feather and scale protein synthesis in epidermal-dermal recombinations

Keratin proteins synthesized by dorsal or tarsometatarsal embryonic chick epidermis in heterotopic and heterospecific epidermal-dermal recombinants were analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and were compared to those produced by normal nondissociated dorsal and tarsometatarsal embryonic skin, as well as to those produced by control homotopic recombinants. Recombinant skins were grafted on the chick chorioallantoic membrane and grown for 8 or 11 days. Recombinants comprising dorsal feather-forming dermis formed feathers, irrespective of the origin of the epidermis. The electrophoretic band patterns of the keratins extracted from these feathers were of typical feather type. Conversely recombinants comprising tarsometatarsal scale-forming dermis formed scales, irrespective of the origin of the epidermis. The band patterns of the keratins extracted from the epidermis of these scales were of typical scale type. Heterospecific recombinants comprising chick dorsal feather-forming epidermis and mouse plantar dermis gave rise to six footpads arranged in a typical mouse pattern. In these recombinants, the chick epidermis produced keratins, the band pattern of which was of typical chick scale type. These results demonstrate that the dermis not only induces the formation of cutaneous appendages in confirmity with its regional origin, but also triggers off in the epidermis the biosynthesis of either of two different keratin types, in accordance with the regional type (feather, scale, or pad) of cutaneous appendages induced. The possible relationship between region-specific morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation is discussed in comparison with results obtained in other kinds of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions.     

Expression of Hex homeobox gene during skin development: Increase in epidermal cell proliferation by transfecting the Hex to the dermis

A number of homeobox genes have been found to be expressed in skin and its appendages, such as scale and feather, and appear to be candidates for the regulation of the development of these tissues. We report that the proline-rich divergent homeobox gene Hex is expressed during development of chick embryonic skin and its appendages (scale and feather). In situ hybridization analysis revealed that, during development of the skin, a transient expression of the Hex gene was observed. While the expression of Hex in the dermis was closely correlated with proliferation activity of epidermal basal cells, that in the epidermis was related to a suppression of epidermal differentiation. When dermal fibroblasts were transfected with Hex, stimulation of both DNA synthesis and proliferation of the epidermal cells followed by two-fold scale ridge elongation and increase in epidermal area was observed during culture of the skin, whereas epidemal keratinization was not affected. This is the first study to demonstrate that Hex is expressed during development of the skin and its appendages and that its expression in the dermal cells regulates epidermal cell proliferation through epithelial mesenchymal interaction.     

Origin of feathers: Feather beta (beta) keratins are expressed in discrete epidermal cell populations of embryonic scutate scales

The feathers of birds develop from embryonic epidermal lineages that differentiate during outgrowth of the feather germ. Independent cell populations also form an embryonic epidermis on scutate scales, which consists of peridermal layers, a subperiderm, and an alpha stratum. Using an antiserum (anti-FbetaK) developed to react specifically with the beta (beta) keratins of feathers, we find that the feather-type beta keratins are expressed in the subperiderm cells of embryonic scutate scales, as well as the barb ridge lineages of the feather. However, unlike the subperiderm of scales, which is lost at hatching, the cells of barb ridges, in conjunction with adjacent cell populations, give rise to the structural elements of the feather. The observation that an embryonic epidermis, consisting of peridermal and subperidermal layers, also characterizes alligator scales (Thompson, 2001. J Anat 198:265-282) suggests that the epidermal populations of the scales and feathers of avian embryos are homologous with those forming the embryonic epidermis of alligators. While the embryonic epidermal populations of archosaurian scales are discarded at hatching, those of the feather germ differentiate into the periderm, sheath, barb ridges, axial plates, barbules, and marginal plates of the embryonic feather filament. We propose that the development of the embryonic feather filament provides a model for the evolution of the first protofeather. Furthermore, we hypothesize that invagination of the epidermal lineages of the feather filament, namely the barb ridges, initiated the formation of the follicle, which then allowed continuous renewal of the feather epidermal lineages, and the evolution of diverse feather forms.     

Distribution and characterization of proteins associated with cornification in the epidermis of gecko lizard

The distribution and molecular weight of epidermal proteins of gecko lizards have been studied by ultrastructural, autoradiographic, and immunological methods. Setae of the climbing digital pads are cross-reactive to antibodies directed against a chick scutate scale beta-keratin but not against feather beta-keratin. Cross-reactivity for mammalian loricrin, sciellin, filaggrin, and transglutaminase are present in alpha-keratogenic layers of gecko epidermis. Alpha-keratins have a molecular weight in the range 40-58 kDa. Loricrin cross-reactive bands have molecular weights of 42, 50, and 58 kDa. Bands for filaggrin-like protein are found at 35 and 42 kDa, bands for sciellin are found at 40-45 and 50-55 kDa, and bands for transglutaminase are seen at 48-50 and 60 kDa. The specific role of these proteins remains to be elucidated. After injection of tritiated histidine, the tracer is incorporated into keratin and in setae. Tritiated proline labels the developing setae of the oberhautchen and beta layers, and proline-labeled proteins (beta-keratins) of 10-14, 16-18, 22-24 and 32-35 kDa are extracted from the epidermis. In whole epidermal extract (that includes the epidermis with corneous layer and the setae of digital pads), beta-keratins of low-molecular weight (10, 14-16, and 18-19 kDa) are prevalent over those at higher molecular weight (34 and 38 kDa). In contrast, in shed epidermis of body scales (made of corneous layer only while setae were not collected), higher molecular weight beta-keratins are present (25-27 and 30-34 kDa). This suggests that a proportion of the small beta-keratins present in the epidermis of geckos derive from the differentiating beta layer of scales and from the setae of digital pads. Neither small nor large beta-keratins of gecko epidermis cross-react with an antibody specifically directed against the feather beta-keratin of 10-12 kDa. This result shows that the 10 and 14-16 kDa beta-keratins of gecko (lepidosaurian) have a different composition than the 10-12 kDa beta-keratin of feather (archosaurian). It is suggested that the smaller beta-keratins in both lineages of sauropsids were selected during evolution in order to build elongated bundles of keratin filaments to make elongated cells. Larger beta-keratins in reptilian scales produce keratin aggregations with no orientation, used for mechanical protection.     

Epidermal-dermal tissue interactions between mutant and normal embryonic back skin: site of mutant gene activity determining abnormal feathering is in the epidermis.

The site of the scaleless gene's activity in the development of abnormal feathers was determined by reciprocally recombining epidermis and dermis between normal and scaleless chick embryos and culturing the recombinants for seven days on the chorioallantoic membrane. When recombined with a common dermal source, feather development is enhanced by scaleless high line as compared to scaleless low line epidermis. Against a common responding tissue, 7-day normal back epidermis, significant differences were not found in feather inducing ability between normal, scaleless high line and scaleless low line dermis. It was concluded that, in relation to abnormal feathering, these tissue interactions reveal that the site of the scaleless gene's activity is the epidermis. A model of tissue interaction in the development of normal and abnormal feathers is presented. According to the model, the focus of the scaleless mutation and the genes accumulated by selection for high or low feather numbers is the epidermis, the effect being that the reactivity of the epidermis to dermal stimuli is altered. Subsequently, the epidermis controls the morphogenetic organization of the dermis. The scaleless dermis is presumed to contain normal positional information for the determination of feather structure and pattern.     

Adaptation to the land: The skin of reptiles in comparison to that of amphibians and endotherm amniotes

The adaptation to land from amphibians to amniotes was accompanied by drastic changes of the integument, some of which might be reconstructed by studying the formation of the stratum corneum during embryogenesis. As the first amniotes were reptiles, the present review focuses on past and recent information on the evolution of reptilian epidermis and the stratum corneum. We aim to generalize the discussion on the evolution of the skin in amniotes. Corneous cell envelopes were absent in fish, and first appeared in adult amphibian epidermis. Stem reptiles evolved a multilayered stratum corneum based on a programmed cell death, intensified the production of matrix proteins (e.g., HRPs), corneous cell envelope proteins (e.g., loricrine-like, sciellin-like, and transglutaminase), and complex lipids to limit water loss. Other proteins were later produced in association to the soft or hairy epidermis in therapsids (e.g., involucrin, profilaggrin-filaggrin, trichohyalin, trichocytic keratins), or to the hard keratin of hairs, quills, horns, claws (e.g., tyrosine-rich, glycine-rich, sulphur-rich matrix proteins). In sauropsids special proteins associated to hard keratinization in scales (e.g., scale beta-keratins, cytokeratin associated proteins) or feathers (feather beta-keratins and HRPs) were originated. The temporal deposition of beta-keratin in lepidosaurian reptiles originated a vertical stratified epidermis and an intraepidermal shedding layer. The evolutions of the horny layer in Therapsids (mammals) and Saurospids (reptiles and birds) are discussed. The study of the molecules involved in the dermo-epidermal interactions in reptilian skin and the molecular biology of epidermal proteins are among the most urgent future areas of research in the biology of reptilian skin.     

Use of retinoic acid for the analysis of dermal-epidermal interactions in the tarsometatarsal skin of the chick embryo

Feet of chicks are normally covered with scales. Injection of retinoic acid into the amniotic cavity of 10-day chick embryos causes the formation of feathers on the foot scales. To elucidate whether retinoic acid affects primarily the epidermis or the dermis, heterotypic dermal-epidermal recombinants of tarsometatarsal skin were tested as to their morphogenetic capacity, when grafted to the chick chorioallantoic membrane. Recombinants involving treated epidermis and untreated dermis formed feathered scales, while the reverse recombinants of untreated epidermis and treated dermis led to the formation of scales only. Likewise the association of treated tarsometatarsal dermis with untreated epidermis from a non-appendage-forming region (the midventral apterium) resulted in the formation of scales only. These results show that retinoic acid affects primarily the epidermis. Further insight into the mechanism of dermal-epidermal interaction was gained by heterotopic recombinations of early (8.5- and 10-day) untreated tarsometatarsal dermis with epidermis from the midventral apterium. These recombinants formed scales, proving that tarsometatarsal dermis is endowed with scale-forming properties as early as 8.5 days of incubation. Finally, it is concluded that retinoic acid acts on the chick foot epidermal cells by temporarily inhibiting their scale placode-forming properties, allowing their latent feather placode-forming properties to be expressed.     

Epidermal-dermal tissue interactions between mutant foot skin and normal back skin: a comparison of the inductive capacities of scaleless low line and normal anterior foot dermis.

The inductive capacities of 9- to 16-day anterior foot dermis of scaleless low line and normal embryos were compared by recombining them with a common source of epidermis, i.e., 7-day normal back epidermis. Tissue recombinants were cultured as grafts to the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). Both normal and scaleless low line dermis of 12 to 13 days of incubation began to lose their ability to elicit feather production in 7-day normal back epidermis. Normal foot dermis began to elicit scale production at 12 to 13 days, whereas scaleless low line anterior foot dermis maintained feather production at a low level. It is inferred that without being associated with scale placode formation, scaleless low line anterior foot dermis does not acquire specific inductive capacities related to the production of an outer scale surface in the overlying epidermis. Feather placodes do not function as surrogates of scale placodes. The difference between normal and scaleless low line anterior foot dermis in terms of specific inductive capacities related to scale production is interpreted as a secondary effect of the action of the scaleless allele in interfering with scale placode formation in the scaleless low line anterior foot epidermis.     

The Expression of Beta ({beta}) Keratins in the Epidermal Appendages of Reptiles and Birds

The integuments of extant vertebrates display a variety of epidermalappendages whose patterns, morphology and terminal differentiation(epidermal keratins) depend upon interactions between ectodermal(epidermis) and mesodermal (dermis) tissues. In reptiles andbirds, appendage morphogenesis precedes terminal differentiation.Studies have demonstrated that appendage morphogenesis influencesthe expression of the appendage specific keratin genes. However,little is known about the nature of the structural genes expressedby the epidermal appendages of reptiles. How pattern formationand/or appendage morphogenesis influence terminal differentiationof reptilian appendages is not known. The epidermal appendages of reptiles and birds are characterizedby the presence of both alpha () and beta (ß) typekeratin proteins. Studies have focused on the genes of avianß keratins because they are the major structural proteinsof feathers. The occurrence of ß keratin proteinsin the scales and claws of both birds and reptiles and theirimmunological cross-reactivity suggest that the genes for reptilianß keratins may be homologous with those of birds.In bird appendages, the ß keratins are the productsof a large family of homologous genes. Specific members of thisgene family are expressed during the development of each appendage.Recent sequence analyses of feather ß keratins, fromdifferent orders of birds, demonstrate that there is more diversityat the DNA level than was implied by earlier protein sequencingstudies. Immunological techniques show that the same antibodies thatreact with the epidermal ß keratins of the chicken(Gallus domesticus) react with the epidermal ß keratinsof American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis). Furthermore,a peptide sequence (20 amino acids) from an alligator claw ßkeratin is similar to a highly conserved region of avian claw,scale, feather, and feather-like ß keratins. Theseobservations suggest that the ß keratin genes of avianepidermal appendages have homologues in the American alligator.Understanding the origin and evolution of the ß keratingene families in reptiles and birds will undoubtedly add toour understanding of the evolution of skin appendages such asscales and feathers.     

Analysis of corneal development with monoclonal antibodies. II. Tissue autonomy in cornea-skin recombinants

Developmental autonomy of corneal epithelial and stromal components was assessed by their subsequent differentiation after recombination with feather-forming thigh dermis and epidermis, respectively. Work by others has shown that feather-forming dermis exhibits strong inductive ability when used in such epithelial-mesenchymal recombinations. After culture of the recombinants on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of host embryos, differentiation as "cornea" was assessed immunohistochemically using the anti-corneal stromal matrix and anti-corneal epithelial antibodies described previously (Zak and Linsenmayer, Dev. Biol. 99, 373-381, 1983). Feather initiation and outgrowth and keratin synthesis served as markers for differentiation as skin. It has been found that corneal epithelia from 5-day embryos, when grown in association with feather-forming dermis from the thigh, will participate in feather formation. In such recombinants, when the corneal epithelium became incorporated into feathers it failed to express the corneal epithelial antigen, but in regions of the recombinant where feathers did not form, de novo expression of the antigen was sometimes detected. The limited liability of the epithelium is not present in corneal epithelia taken from embryos a day or two older. When such epithelia were used for making the recombinants, no feathers were formed and the corneal epithelial antigen was extensively produced. Thus epithelial determination occurs long before the epithelium would begin to overtly differentiate and express the epithelial antigen in vivo (about 12 days of development). In reciprocal recombinations of corneal stromas with feather-forming epidermis, the stromas proceeded to express the corneal stromal matrix specific antigen de novo after culture on the CAM. They did not, however, redirect differentiation of the epidermis which never expressed the corneal epithelial antigen and in some cases went on to keratinize. These results indicate that development of both the corneal epithelial and stromal components becomes autonomous at least several days before these tissues overtly differentiate. This suggests that the component tissues of the cornea may not interact in a manner typical of those of other organs which, in general, are thought to require continual interaction of their epithelial and mesenchymal components for normal development.     

Avian skin development and the evolutionary origin of feathers

The discovery of several dinosaurs with filamentous integumentary appendages of different morphologies has stimulated models for the evolutionary origin of feathers. In order to understand these models, knowledge of the development of the avian integument must be put into an evolutionary context. Thus, we present a review of avian scale and feather development, which summarizes the morphogenetic events involved, as well as the expression of the beta (beta) keratin multigene family that characterizes the epidermal appendages of reptiles and birds. First we review information on the evolution of the ectodermal epidermis and its beta (beta) keratins. Then we examine the morphogenesis of scutate scales and feathers including studies in which the extraembryonic ectoderm of the chorion is used to examine dermal induction. We also present studies on the scaleless (sc) mutant, and, because of the recent discovery of "four-winged" dinosaurs, we review earlier studies of a chicken strain, Silkie, that expresses ptilopody (pti), "feathered feet." We conclude that the ability of the ectodermal epidermis to generate discrete cell populations capable of forming functional structural elements consisting of specific members of the beta keratin multigene family was a plesiomorphic feature of the archosaurian ancestor of crocodilians and birds. Evidence suggests that the discrete epidermal lineages that make up the embryonic feather filament of extant birds are homologous with similar embryonic lineages of the developing scutate scales of birds and the scales of alligators. We believe that the early expression of conserved signaling modules in the embryonic skin of the avian ancestor led to the early morphogenesis of the embryonic feather filament, with its periderm, sheath, and barb ridge lineages forming the first protofeather. Invagination of the epidermis of the protofeather led to formation of the follicle providing for feather renewal and diversification. The observations that scale formation in birds involves an inhibition of feather formation coupled with observations on the feathered feet of the scaleless (High-line) and Silkie strains support the view that the ancestor of modern birds may have had feathered hind limbs similar to those recently discovered in nonavian dromaeosaurids. And finally, our recent observation on the bristles of the wild turkey beard raises the possibility that similar integumentary appendages may have adorned nonavian dinosaurs, and thus all filamentous integumentary appendages may not be homologous to modern feathers.     

On the origin of feathers

The appearance of feathers defines the appearance of birds. A number of changes defined, preceded or accompanied the event. The changes were hierarchical in nature and included revolutions in genomic organization (i.e., HOX and the feather keratin genes), protein sequence and shape, the large scale organization of proteins into filaments, and in the geometry of the cells and their roles in the follicle. Changes at each of these levels differ or produced different products than found in its analog in reptiles. They are essentially unique to birds and produced an evolutionary novelty. I used analysis of extant structure and information on development to reconstruct key events in the evolution of feathers. The ancestral reptilian epidermal structure, while probably a scale or tubercles, is still unidentified. The structural genes of feather proteins (φ-keratin) are tandem repeats probably assembled from pre-existing exons. They are unlike the alpha-keratin of vertebrate soft epidermis. Amino-acid composition, shape, and behavior of feather keratins are unique among vertebrates. The 3-dimensional organization of the follicle and the developmental processes are also unique. Although we lack a complete understanding of the appearance and early role of feathers, they are clearly the results of novel events.     

The epidermis of scales in gecko lizards contains multiple forms of beta-keratins including basic glycine-proline-serine-rich proteins

The epidermis of scales of gecko lizards comprises alpha- and beta-keratins. Using bidimensional electrophoresis and immunoblotting, we have characterized keratins of corneous layers of scales in geckos, especially beta-keratins in digit pad lamellae. In the latter, the formation of thin bristles (setae) allow for the adhesion and climbing vertical or inverted surfaces. alpha-Keratins of 55-66 kDa remain in the acidic and neutral range of pI, while beta-keratins of 13-18 kDa show a broader variation of pI (4-10). Some protein spots for beta-keratins correspond to previously sequenced, basic glycine-proline-serine-rich beta-keratins of 169-191 amino acids. The predicted secondary structure shows that a large part of the molecule has a random-coiled conformation, small alpha helix regions, and a central region with 2-3 strands (beta-folding). The latter, termed core-box, shows homology with feather-scale-claw keratins of birds and is involved in the formation of beta-keratin filaments. Immunolocalization of beta-keratins indicates that these proteins are mainly present in the beta-layer and oberhautchen layer, including setae. The sequenced proteins of setae form bundles of keratins that determine their elongation. This process resembles that of feather-keratin on the elongation of barbule cells in feathers. It is suggested that small proteins rich in glycine, serine, and proline evolved in reptiles and birds to reinforce the mechanical resistance of the cytokeratin cytoskeleton initially present in the epidermis of scales and feathers.     

Transfilter analysis of the inductive influence of proventricular mesenchyme on stomach epithelial differentiation of chick embryos

Summary To clarify the precise conditions under which chick embryonic proventricular mesenchyme can induce proventricular epithelial differentiation, transfilter experiments were carried out. Six-day proventricular epithelium formed glands and expressed pepsinogen when a Nucleopore filter with a pore size of more than 0.6 m, but not 0.2 m, was inserted between the epithelium and the proventricular mesenchyme. The larger the pore size of the filter, the more elongated the glands and the more pepsinogen was induced in the explants. The quail nuclear marker and scanning electron microscopy were used to examine penetration of mesenchymal cells through the Nuclepore filter. The filter of more than 0.2 m pore size allowed cell processes of mesenchymal cells to pass through. However, only the filter with a pore size of more than 0.6 m allowed actual migration of mesenchymal cells through the filter, and the larger the pore size of the filter, the more mesenchymal cells passed through. Under the same conditions 6-day and 4.5-day gizzard epithelium formed glands and expressed pepsinogen. These results indicate that a flow of diffusible substances through a Nuclepore filter and even direct contact of a few short cell processes of mesenchymal cells with epithelial cells are not sufficient for induction, and that direct contact of mesenchymal cell processes and/or mesenchymal cells with epithelial cells over a considerably wide area may be prerequisite for the induction.