m-xylene-responsive Pu-PnifH hybrid sigma54 promoters that overcome physiological control in Pseudomonas putida KT2442

The sequences surrounding the -12/-24 motif of the m-xylene-responsive sigma54 promoter Pu of the Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid pWW0 were replaced by various DNA segments of the same size recruited from PnifH sigma54 promoter variants known to have various degrees of efficacy and affinity for sigma54-RNA polymerase (RNAP). In order to have an accurate comparison of the output in vivo of each of the hybrids, the resulting promoters were recombined at the same location of the chromosome of P. putida KT2442 with a tailored vector system. The promoters included the upstream activation sequence (UAS) for the cognate regulator of the TOL system (XylR) fused to the -12/-24 region of the wild-type PnifH and its higher sigma54-RNAP affinity variants PnifH049 and PnifH319. As a control, the downstream region of the glnAp2 promoter (lacking integration host factor) was fused to the XylR UAS as well. When the induction patterns of the corresponding lacZ fusion strains were compared in vivo, we observed that promoters bearing the RNAP binding site of PnifH049 and PnifH319 were not silenced during exponential growth, as is distinctly the case for the wild-type Pu promoter or for the Pu-PnifH variant. Taken together, our results indicate that the promoter sequence(s) spanning the -12/-24 region of Pu dictates the coupling of promoter output to growth conditions.     

The role of the interdomain B linker in the activation of the XylR protein of Pseudomonas putida

In the presence of toluene and other structural analogues, the enhancer binding protein XylR activates the sigma54 promoter Pu of the TOL (toluene degradation) plasmid pWW0 of Pseudomonas putida. Introduction of amino acid changes Val-219Asp and Ala-220Pro, which enter a proline kink at the interdomain region (B linker) between the A (signal reception) module and the central portion of XylR, originated a protein with unforeseen properties. These included a minor ability to activate Pu in the absence of aromatic effectors, a much higher responsiveness to m-xylene and a significant response to a large collection of aromatic inducers. Such changes could not be attributed to variations in XylR expression levels or to the fortuitous creation of a novel promoter, but to a genuine change in the properties of the activator. Structural predictions suggested that the mutation entirely disrupted an otherwise probable coiled-coil structure. A second directed mutant within the same region consisting of a major replacement of amino acids A220-N221 by the peptide HHHR produced an even more exacerbated phenotype. These data support a model in which the linker B region influences the effector profile by modifying at a distance the operative shape of the effector pocket and fixing the protein in an intermediate step of the activation process.