A toolbox for generating single‐stranded DNA in optical tweezers experiments

Essential genomic transactions such as DNA‐damage repair and DNA replication take place on single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) or require specific single‐stranded/double‐stranded DNA (ssDNA/dsDNA) junctions (SDSJ). A significant challenge in single‐molecule studies of DNA–protein interactions using optical trapping is the design and generation of appropriate DNA templates. In contrast to dsDNA, only a limited toolbox is available for the generation of ssDNA constructs for optical tweezers experiments. Here, we present several kinds of DNA templates suitable for single‐molecule experiments requiring segments of ssDNA of several kilobases in length. These different biotinylated dsDNA templates can be tethered between optically trapped microspheres and can, by the subsequent use of force‐induced DNA melting, be converted into partial or complete ssDNA molecules. We systematically investigated the time scale and efficiency of force‐induced melting at different ionic strengths for DNA molecules of different sequences and lengths. Furthermore, we quantified the impact of microspheres of different sizes on the lifetime of ssDNA tethers in optical tweezers experiments. Together, these experiments provide deeper insights into the variables that impact the production of ssDNA for single molecules studies and represent a starting point for further optimization of DNA templates that permit the investigation of protein binding and kinetics on ssDNA. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 99:611–620, 2013.     

Surface shapes and surrounding environment analysis of single‐ and double‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins in protein‐DNA interface

Protein‐DNA bindings are critical to many biological processes. However, the structural mechanisms underlying these interactions are not fully understood. Here, we analyzed the residues shape (peak, flat, or valley) and the surrounding environment of double‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins (DSBs) and single‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins (SSBs) in protein‐DNA interfaces. In the results, we found that the interface shapes, hydrogen bonds, and the surrounding environment present significant differences between the two kinds of proteins. Built on the investigation results, we constructed a random forest (RF) classifier to distinguish DSBs and SSBs with satisfying performance. In conclusion, we present a novel methodology to characterize protein interfaces, which will deepen our understanding of the specificity of proteins binding to ssDNA (single‐stranded DNA) or dsDNA (double‐stranded DNA). Proteins 2016; 84:979–989. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase targets DNA at sites of RNA polymerase II stalling by interaction with Spt5

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates antibody gene diversification by creating U:G mismatches. However, AID is not specific for antibody genes; Off-target lesions can activate oncogenes or cause chromosome translocations. Despite its importance in these transactions little is known about how AID finds its targets. We performed an shRNA screen to identify factors required for class switch recombination (CSR) of antibody loci. We found that Spt5, a factor associated with stalled RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and single stranded DNA (ssDNA), is required for CSR. Spt5 interacts with AID, it facilitates association between AID and Pol II, and AID recruitment to its Ig and non-Ig targets. ChIP-seq experiments reveal that Spt5 colocalizes with AID and stalled Pol II. Further, Spt5 accumulation at sites of Pol II stalling is predictive of AID-induced mutation. We propose that AID is targeted to sites of Pol II stalling in part via its association with Spt5.     

A label‐free DNAzyme‐cleaving fluorescence method for the determination of trace Pb2+ based on catalysis of AuPd nanoalloy on the reduction of rhodamine 6G

The substrate chain of double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA) could be specifically cleaved by Pb²⁺ to release single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) that adsorbs onto the AuPd nanoalloy (AuPdNP) to form a stable AuPdNP–ssDNA complex, but the dsDNA can not protect AuPdNPs in large AuPdNP aggregates (AuPdNPA) under the action of NaCl. AuPdNP–ssDNA and large AuPdNPA could be separated by centrifugation. On increasing the concentration of Pb²⁺, the amount of released ssDNA increased; AuPdNP–ssDNA increased in the centrifugation solution exhibiting a catalytic effect on the slow reaction of rhodamine 6G (Rh6G) and NaH₂PO₂, which led to fluorescence quenching at 552 nm. The decrease in fluorescence intensity (ΔF) was linear to the concentration of Pb²⁺ within the range 0.33–8.00 nmol/L, with a detection limit of 0.21 nmol/L. The proposed method was applied to detect Pb²⁺ in water samples, with satisfactory results. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

RADX interacts with single‐stranded DNA to promote replication fork stability

Single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) regions form as an intermediate in many DNA‐associated transactions. Multiple cellular proteins interact with ssDNA via the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide‐binding (OB) fold domain. The heterotrimeric, multi‐OB fold domain‐containing Replication Protein A (RPA) complex has an essential genome maintenance role, protecting ssDNA regions from nucleolytic degradation and providing a recruitment platform for proteins involved in responses to replication stress and DNA damage. Here, we identify the uncharacterized protein RADX (CXorf57) as an ssDNA‐binding factor in human cells. RADX binds ssDNA via an N‐terminal OB fold cluster, which mediates its recruitment to sites of replication stress. Deregulation of RADX expression and ssDNA binding leads to enhanced replication fork stalling and degradation, and we provide evidence that a balanced interplay between RADX and RPA ssDNA‐binding activities is critical for avoiding these defects. Our findings establish RADX as an important component of cellular pathways that promote DNA replication integrity under basal and stressful conditions by means of multiple ssDNA‐binding proteins.     

Proteomic Analysis of DNA Synthesis on a Structured DNA Template in Human Cellular Extracts: Interplay Between NHEJ and Replication‐Associated Proteins

It is established that short inverted repeats trigger base substitution mutagenesis in human cells. However, how the replication machinery deals with structured DNA is unknown. It has been previously reported that in human cell‐free extracts, DNA primer extension using a structured single‐stranded template is transiently blocked at DNA hairpins. Here, the proteomic analysis of proteins bound to the DNA template is reported and evidence that the DNA‐PK complex (DNA‐PKcs and the Ku heterodimer) recognizes, and is activated by, structured single‐stranded DNA is provided. Hijacking the DNA‐PK complex by double‐stranded oligonucleotides results in a large removal of the pausing sites and an elevated DNA extension efficiency. Conversely, DNA‐PKcs inhibition results in its stabilization on the template, along with other proteins acting downstream in the Non‐Homologous End‐Joining (NHEJ) pathway, especially the XRCC4‐DNA ligase 4 complex and the cofactor PAXX. Retention of NHEJ factors to the DNA in the absence of DNA‐PKcs activity correlates with additional halts of primer extension, suggesting that these proteins hinder the progression of the DNA synthesis at these sites. Overall these results raise the possibility that, upon binding to hairpins formed onto ssDNA during fork progression, the DNA‐PK complex interferes with replication fork dynamics in vivo.     

Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single‐stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends

Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinases are activated by DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs). Mec1/ATR recruitment to DSBs requires the formation of RPA‐coated single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA), which arises from 5′–3′ nucleolytic degradation (resection) of DNA ends. Here, we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 regulates resection of the DSB ends. The lack of Mec1 accelerates resection and reduces the loading to DSBs of the checkpoint protein Rad9, which is known to inhibit ssDNA generation. Extensive resection is instead inhibited by the Mec1‐ad mutant variant that increases the recruitment near the DSB of Rad9, which in turn blocks DSB resection by both Rad53‐dependent and Rad53‐independent mechanisms. The mec1‐ad resection defect leads to prolonged persistence at DSBs of the MRX complex that causes unscheduled Tel1 activation, which in turn impairs checkpoint switch off. Thus, Mec1 regulates the generation of ssDNA at DSBs, and this control is important to coordinate Mec1 and Tel1 signaling activities at these breaks.     

Rtt105 functions as a chaperone for replication protein A to preserve genome stability

Generation of single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) is required for the template strand formation during DNA replication. Replication Protein A (RPA) is an ssDNA‐binding protein essential for protecting ssDNA at replication forks in eukaryotic cells. While significant progress has been made in characterizing the role of the RPA–ssDNA complex, how RPA is loaded at replication forks remains poorly explored. Here, we show that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein regulator of Ty1 transposition 105 (Rtt105) binds RPA and helps load it at replication forks. Cells lacking Rtt105 exhibit a dramatic reduction in RPA loading at replication forks, compromised DNA synthesis under replication stress, and increased genome instability. Mechanistically, we show that Rtt105 mediates the RPA–importin interaction and also promotes RPA binding to ssDNA directly in vitro, but is not present in the final RPA–ssDNA complex. Single‐molecule studies reveal that Rtt105 affects the binding mode of RPA to ssDNA. These results support a model in which Rtt105 functions as an RPA chaperone that escorts RPA to the nucleus and facilitates its loading onto ssDNA at replication forks.     

The intrinsically disordered linker of E. coli SSB is critical for the release from single‐stranded DNA

The Escherichia coli single stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) is crucial for DNA replication, recombination and repair. Within each process, it has two seemingly disparate roles: it stabilizes single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates generated during DNA processing and, forms complexes with a group of proteins known as the SSB‐interactome. Key to both roles is the C‐terminal, one‐third of the protein, in particular the intrinsically disordered linker (IDL). Previously, they have shown using a series of linker deletion mutants that the IDL links both ssDNA and target protein binding by mediating interactions with the oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide binding fold in the target. In this study, they examine the role of the linker region in SSB function in a variety of DNA metabolic processes in vitro. Using the same linker mutants, the results show that in addition to association reactions (either DNA or protein), the IDL is critical for the release of SSB from DNA. This release can be under conditions of ssDNA competition or active displacement by a DNA helicase or recombinase. Consistent with their previous work these results indicate that SSB linker mutants are defective for SSB–SSB interactions, and when the IDL is removed a terminal SSB–DNA complex results. Formation of this complex inhibits downstream processing of DNA by helicases such as RecG or PriA as well as recombination, mediated by RecA. A model, based on the evidence herein, is presented to explain how the IDL acts in SSB function.     

Initiation of DNA damage responses through XPG‐related nucleases

Lesion‐specific enzymes repair different forms of DNA damage, yet all lesions elicit the same checkpoint response. The common intermediate required to mount a checkpoint response is thought to be single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA), coated by replication protein A (RPA) and containing a primer‐template junction. To identify factors important for initiating the checkpoint response, we screened for genes that, when overexpressed, could amplify a checkpoint signal to a weak allele of chk1 in fission yeast. We identified Ast1, a novel member of the XPG‐related family of endo/exonucleases. Ast1 promotes checkpoint activation caused by the absence of the other XPG‐related nucleases, Exo1 and Rad2, the homologue of Fen1. Each nuclease is recruited to DSBs, and promotes the formation of ssDNA for checkpoint activation and recombinational repair. For Rad2 and Exo1, this is independent of their S‐phase role in Okazaki fragment processing. This XPG‐related pathway is distinct from MRN‐dependent responses, and each enzyme is critical for damage resistance in MRN mutants. Thus, multiple nucleases collaborate to initiate DNA damage responses, highlighting the importance of these responses to cellular fitness.     

Differences in the enzymatic efficiency of human and bony fish AID are mediated by a single residue in the C terminus modulating single-stranded DNA binding

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) mediates antibody diversification by deaminating deoxycytidines to deoxyuridine within immunoglobulin genes. However, it also generates genome-wide DNA lesions, leading to transformation. Though the biochemical properties of AID have been described, its 3-dimensional structure has not been determined. Hence, to investigate the relationship between the primary structure and biochemical characteristics of AID, we compared the properties of human and bony fish AID, since these are most divergent in amino acid sequence. We show that AIDs of various species have different catalytic rates that are thermosensitive and optimal at native physiological temperatures. Zebrafish AID is severalfold more catalytically robust than human AID, while catfish AID is least active. This disparity is mediated by a single amino acid difference in the C terminus. Using functional assays supported by models of AID core and surface structure, we show that this residue modulates activity by affecting ssDNA binding. Furthermore, the cold-adapted catalytic rates of fish AID result from increased ssDNA binding affinity at lower temperatures. Our work suggests that AID may generate DNA damage with variable efficiencies in different organisms, identifies residues critical in regulating AID activity, and provides insights into the evolution of the APOBEC family of enzymes.     

5′‐Single‐stranded/duplex DNA junctions are loading sites for E. coli UvrD translocase

Escherichia coli UvrD is a 3′–5′ superfamily 1A helicase/translocase involved in a variety of DNA metabolic processes. UvrD can function either as a helicase or only as an single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) translocase. The switch between these activities is controlled in vitro by the UvrD oligomeric state; a monomer has ssDNA translocase activity, whereas at least a dimer is needed for helicase activity. Although a 3′‐ssDNA partial duplex provides a high‐affinity site for a UvrD monomer, here we show that a monomer also binds with specificity to DNA junctions possessing a 5′‐ssDNA flanking region and can initiate translocation from this site. Thus, a 5′‐ss–duplex DNA junction can serve as a high‐affinity loading site for the monomeric UvrD translocase, whereas a 3′‐ss–duplex DNA junction inhibits both translocase and helicase activity of the UvrD monomer. Furthermore, the 2B subdomain of UvrD is important for this junction specificity. This highlights a separation of helicase and translocase function for UvrD and suggests that a monomeric UvrD translocase can be loaded at a 5′‐ssDNA junction when translocation activity alone is needed.