Switching from premixed insulin to glargine-based insulin regimen improves glycaemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes: a retrospective primary care-based analysis

Background

Inflammation contributes to cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes, which are often characterized by microvascular alterations. We investigated whether myeloid-related protein 8/14 complex (MRP8/14) secreted by transmigrating monocytes and granulocytes may represent a biomarker for microvascular alterations in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

Methods

MRP8/14 was measured in 43 patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Additionally, the inflammatory markers Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified. To detect microvascular alterations proteinuria and retinal vessel caliber were used as classical and novel marker, respectively. Proteinuria was quantified by protein-creatinine ratio (PCR); retinal vessel caliber was quantified after retina photography on digitalized retina pictures.

Results

MRP8/14 was positively associated with inflammation (r = 0.57), proteinuria (r = 0.40) and retinal arterial caliber (r = 0.48). Type 2 diabetic patients with MRP8/14 values above the median of 5.8 μg/ml demonstrated higher proteinuria and larger retinal artery caliber than patients with MRP8/14 values below the median (logPCR: -0.51 ± 0.52 versus -0.96 ± 0.46, P < 0.01; retinal artery lumen (μm): 178.3 ± 14.1 versus 162.7 ± 14.9 P < 0.01). Both groups did not differ with regard to metabolic factors and blood pressure. MRP8/14 was an independent predictor of retinal artery caliber in multivariate stepwise regression analysis (β = 0.607) and was positively associated with IL-6 (r = 0.57, P < 0.001) and TNF-α (r = 0.36, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

MRP8/14 – a marker for transendothelial migration – describes not only the state of inflammation in diabetic nephropathy, but additionally the degree of microvascular alterations in the glomerular and retinal bed. Therefore, MRP8/14 may be a potentially selective novel biomarker for microcirculatory defects in diabetic nephropathy.     

Effects of insulin therapy on liver fat content and hepatic insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes

We determined whether insulin therapy changes liver fat content (LFAT) or hepatic insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. Fourteen patients with type 2 diabetes (age 51+/-2 yr, body mass index 33.1+/-1.4 kg/m2) treated with metformin alone received additional basal insulin for 7 mo. Liver fat (proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy), fat distribution (MRI), fat-free and fat mass, and whole body and hepatic insulin sensitivity (6-h euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with infusion of [3-(3)H]glucose) were measured. The insulin dose averaged 75+/-10 IU/day (0.69+/-0.08 IU/kg, range 24-132 IU/day). Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c) decreased from 8.9+/-0.3 to 7.4+/-0.2% (P<0.001). Whole body insulin sensitivity increased from 2.21+/-0.38 to 3.08+/-0.40 mg/kg fat-free mass (FFM).min (P<0.05). This improvement could be attributed to enhanced suppression of hepatic glucose production (HGP) by insulin (HGP 1.04+/-0.28 vs. 0.21+/-0.19 mg/kg FFM.min, P<0.01). The percent suppression of HGP by insulin increased from 72+/-8 to 105+/-11% (P<0.01). LFAT decreased from 17+/-3 to 14+/-3% (P<0.05). The change in LFAT was significantly correlated with that in hepatic insulin sensitivity (r=0.56, P<0.05). Body weight increased by 3.0+/-1.1 kg (P<0.05). Of this, 83% was due to an increase in fat-free mass (P<0.01). Fat distribution and serum adiponectin concentrations remained unchanged while serum free fatty acids decreased significantly. Conclusions: insulin therapy improves hepatic insulin sensitivity and slightly but significantly reduces liver fat content, independent of serum adiponectin.     

Prevention of type 2 diabetes: the strategic approach for implementation

A growing need exists to deliver effective and affordable prevention programs and to take urgent action to address the major public health challenge that diabetes represents. Achieving prevention of type 2 diabetes requires moving through a series of steps from basic science discovery to widespread distribution of effective interventions. Understanding the cellular level influences on diabetes prevention will help target particular interventions to those who may be most responsive. Several randomized controlled trials conducted throughout the world have demonstrated that type 2 diabetes can be prevented or delayed. Subsequent real-world translation studies have provided important information necessary to reduce cost and increase access. Ultimately achieving a population impact in diabetes prevention requires widespread distribution of effective interventions, which is supported by policies that help achieve sustainability and reach. The use of a global stakeholder network can help to share experiences and build on partner knowledge gained.     

Insulin requirement profiles and related factors of insulin pump therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion(CSII) is an effective therapy to control hyperglycemia in both patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.However,there is little data investigating the insulin dose setting during CSII therapy in type 2 diabetes to achieve optimal glycemic control and avoid the risk of hypoglycemia.Thus,this study is aimed to assess the dose characteristics of insulin requirement and explore the related clinical factors in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with CSII.A total of 327 patients(195 males) aged 52.9±12.5 years old were included in this study.Patients were treated with CSII to achieve the target fasting capillary blood glucose(4.4-7.0 mmol L ~(-1)) and 2-h postprandial capillary blood glucose(4.4-10.0 mmol L ~(-1)) by adjusting insulin infusion according to the seven-point capillary blood glucose profiles.Total daily insulin dose(TDD),total daily insulin dose per kilogram(TDD kg-1) and the ratio of total basal insulin dose(TBD) to TDD(%TBa) were calculated after patients achieved the glucose targets for at least 3 days via 1-2 weeks of CSII treatment.And insulin dose,insulin dosing patterns and the relevant clinical factors were analyzed.The mean ratio of basal/bolus insulin distribution of all patients was 40%:60%.Patients with central obesity needed more TDD(51.3±17.1 U versus 43.5±14.0 U,P0.05) and TDD kg ~(-1)(0.8±0.3 U kg ~(-1) versus 0.7±0.2 U kg ~(-1),P0.05) than those without central obesity.Pearson's correlation analysis demonstrated that TDD was positively correlated with body mass index(BMI),waist circumference(WC),baseline fasting plasma glucose(FPG),fasting C-peptide level,2 h-postprandial C-peptide level and time to achieve glycemic target(all P0.05);TDD kg ~(-1) was positively correlated with waist-to-hip ratio(WHR),baseline FPG,glycosylated hemoglobin Ale(HbAlc),fasting C-peptide level and time to achieve glycemic target,and negatively correlated with BMI(all P0.05).Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that BMI(β=1.796,P0.01),WC(β=0.109,P0.01),baseline FPG(β=1.459,P0.01) and HbAlc(β=0.930,P=0.021) were independently related to TDD.Gender(β=-0.107,P=0.003),WC(β=0.005,P=0.029),baseline FPG(β=0.025,P0.01) and HbAlc(β=0.016,β=0.007) were independently associated with TDD kg ~(-1).Gender(β=-0.015,P=0.048) and disease duration(β=0.134,P=0.029) were independently associated with %TBa.%TBa is around 40% in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with CSII when glycemic control is achieved.In addition to body weight or BMI,WC and glucose levels before CSII should be considered to set TDD.Patients with central obesity or poor glycemic control might need more TDD.Higher %TBa should be considered in female patients or patients with longer disease duration.     

Addition of basal insulin to oral antidiabetic agents: a goal-directed approach to type 2 diabetes therapy

The objective of this article is to review current findings in the published literature on the efficacy of insulin therapy in combination with oral antidiabetic agents, with a focus on practical information that might help to provide an evidence-based template for selecting how best to combine oral agents and basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Here we review the current oral agents used to treat type 2 diabetes, their mechanisms of action, and how they can be combined with insulin therapy to help patients achieve guideline-recommended glycemic goals. While practical advice exists for initiating a therapeutic regimen comprised of basal insulin and oral agent(s), direction as to appropriate therapy for individual patients with differing physiologic requirements is needed. Oral antidiabetic therapy in combination with insulin provides an effective therapeutic option for patients who are unable to achieve or maintain glycemic goals on oral therapy alone.     

Effectiveness of intensive insulin therapy by multiple daily injections and continuous subcutaneous infusion: a comparison study in type 2 diabetes with conventional insulin regimen failure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two intensified insulin regimens, i.e., pump delivery versus multiple daily injections in patients with type 2 diabetes not optimally controlled with conventional insulin therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventeen type 2 diabetes patients uncontrolled by two daily injections of regular plus NPH were randomly assigned in a cross-over fashion to either three daily injections of lispro plus NPH or pump device delivering lispro. HbA1c, 6 points capillary blood glucose, 24-hour continuous glucose monitoring system tracings and global satisfaction score were evaluated at the end of each 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased from 9.0+/-1.6% to 8.6+/-1.6% with multiple injections and 7.7+/-0.8% with pump device (p<0.03). Capillary blood glucose was lowered at all time-points with pump, but only at morning with multiple injections (p<0.01). Compared to conventional therapy, pump reduced hyperglycemic area under curve by 73% (p<0.01), but multiple injections by only 32% (p=0.08). Rate of hypoglycemia was not increased and patient's satisfaction was comparable with both intensive treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Pump therapy provides a better metabolic control than injection regimens, and seems to be safe and convenient in patients with type 2 diabetes who fail to respond to conventional insulin therapy.     

Effect of insulin therapy on plasma leptin and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: This study set out to define relationships between changes in plasma leptin and changes in body weight, plasma insulin and blood glucose control during a 12-month crossover study of once-daily Ultratard or twice-daily Insulatard insulin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fasting plasma leptin and insulin were measured during a multicentre cross-over study involving 60 subjects with type 2 diabetes (fasting glucose > 8 mM). After a 2-month run-in, there were two 6-month periods of treatment with Insulatard or Ultratard insulin. RESULTS: Mean plasma leptin increased significantly in both groups after insulin therapy was instigated (12.8 +/- 8.1 to 22.9 +/- 13.1 ng/ml in the Insulatard group; 12.1 +/- 7.2 to 19.2 +/- 12.3 ng/ml in the Ultratard group). Weight also increased significantly in both groups (82.4 +/- 14.3 kg to 88.8 +/- 14.3 kg and 82.2 +/- 15.3 kg to 85.3 +/- 15.2 kg respectively). The increase in plasma leptin correlated well with the increase in weight (R = 0.416, p = 0.001), and this correlation continued after the crossover point. Plasma leptin correlated with BMI throughout the study (R = 0.540, p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The sustained rise in body weight despite a substantial increase in plasma leptin suggests that either resistance to the hypothalamic action of leptin develops when insulin therapy is begun in type 2 diabetes, or that resetting of the set point for body weight occurs such that a larger body mass is tolerated for a given level of plasma leptin.     

Switching to basal-bolus insulin therapy is effective and safe in long-term type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled with other insulin regimens

AimTo assess in standard clinical practice the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of switching patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and poor or unstable blood glucose control to basal-bolus insulin therapy.Material and methodsThis was a prospective, single center study including 37 patients with T2DM (age 65 ± 8 years, 62.2% men, body mass index 28.8 ± 6.2 kg/m², diabetes duration 18 ± 8 years) with poor or unstable glycemic control, who were switched to a basal-bolus insulin regimen with glargine and rapid-acting insulin analogue at the discretion of their physicians. After a group-structured outpatient diabetes training program, patients were followed in a clinical practice setting for 6 months. Clinical and biochemical variables were collected before switching and at 3 and 6 months.ResultsAfter switching to basal-bolus therapy, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased from 9 ± 1.2% to 8.1 ± 1.2% (p < 0.001) at 3 months and to 8.0 ± 1.2% at 6 months (p < 0.001) without changing total daily insulin dose. The proportion of patients with HbA1c ≥ 9% decreased from 51% to 13.8% at 3 months and to 18.9% at 6 months respectively. There was a single episode of severe hypoglycemia. No changes were seen in body weight and quality of life. The size of LDL (low density lipoprotein) particles significantly increased at 3 and 6 months, while all other lipid parameters remained unchanged.ConclusionsOur study confirmed that basal-bolus insulin therapy is feasible, effective, and safe in patients with long-standing T2DM, and does not impair their quality of life.     

Management of progressive type 2 diabetes: role of insulin therapy

Insulin is an effective treatment for achieving tight glycemic control and improving clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes. While insulin therapy is required from the onset of diagnosis in type 1 disease, its role in type 2 diabetes requires consideration as to when to initiate and advance therapy. In this article, we review a case study that unfolds over 5 years and discuss the therapeutic decision points, initiation and advancement of insulin regimens, and analyze new data regarding the advantages and disadvantages of tight management of glucose levels.     

Weight management in basal-bolus insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: The deep south diabetes program

Background: Weight gain is considered to be a standard clinical complication of insulin therapy. This complication bears heavily on patient populations at risk for obesity, such as those in the southeastern United States.Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the weight changes associated with intensive basal-bolus insulin therapy in the Deep South Diabetes Program. Effectiveness was assessed by evaluating the relationship between changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) and changes in body weight that occurred during therapy.Methods: The clinical setting was a safety-net, rural community health center for the uninsured and underinsured population in Hardin County, Tennessee. The patients were sick adults with significant, often disabling disease, typically on treatments that were ineffective or produced significant clinical toxicities. This study occurred during a period of retrenchment in the state health insurance program. In this retrospective observational study, information on body weight and A1C measurements was collected over a period of 4 years and analyzed using proprietary and customized database and analysis tools. All patients in the Deep South Diabetes Program who elected intensive basal-bolus insulin therapy and who sustained the treatment for up to 4 years were included in the study. Insulin glargine was used as the primary basal insulin, and insulin aspart was used as the primary bolus insulin. The correlations between net weight change and net A1C change, the duration of treatment, and the degree of reduction in A1C required to achieve normoglycemia and near-normoglycemia were analyzed. Glycemic variability and psychosocial variables were outside the scope of this study.Results: The mean weight for the study population did not change during intensive basal-bolus insulin therapy. When we examined the relationship between weight gain and decreases in A1C, no net weight gain for the patient population as a whole could be associated with lowering of A1C; 20% of the patients experienced no net weight change and 47% experienced a net weight change of <7.5 lb during the 4-year study. An investigation of weight loss with treatment duration showed that patients in treatment <1 year lost a mean of ~4 lb, whereas patients in treatment >2 years gained a mean of ~2 lb. Significant variations in weight among the patients were attributed to the all-inclusive nature of the study; patients with weight-sensitive conditions, including cancer, depression, and congestive heart failure, were not excluded from the study.Conclusions: Providers and patients worked together, using a treatment algorithm and shared medical visits, to create a culture in which normoglycemia was an expected outcome. Results of this study showed that weight gain was not an inescapable clinical complication of basal-bolus insulin therapy.     

Increased tissue kallikrein amidase activity in urine of patients with type 1 diabetes under insulin therapy, and in those with gestational diabetes mellitus not under insulin therapy

Human tissue kallikrein (hK1) is reduced in hypertension, cardiovascular and renal diseases. There is little information on the participation of hK1 in type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), type 2 DM, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the roles of insulin and hyperglycemia on urinary hK1 activity in type 1 DM and in GDM. Forty-three type 1 DM patients (5–35 years, disease duration ?5 years, receiving insulin, HbA_1c > 7.6%) were selected. Forty-three healthy individuals, paired according to gender and age, were used as controls. Thirty GDM patients (18–42 years, between the 24th and 37th week of pregnancy, recently diagnosed, not under insulin therapy) were also selected. Thirty healthy pregnant (18–42 years, between the 24th and 37th week of pregnancy) and 30 healthy non-pregnant women (18–42 years) were selected as controls. Random midstream urine was used. hK1 amidase activity was estimated with D-Val-Leu-Arg-Nan substrate. Creatinine was determined by Jaffe’s method. hK1 specific amidase activity was expressed as μM/(min mg creatinine) to correct for differences in urine flow rate. hK1 specific amidase activity was significantly higher in the urine of type 1 DM than in controls, and in the urine of GDM patients than in healthy pregnant women and healthy non-pregnant women, respectively. The data suggest that hyperglycemia, rather than insulin, is involved in the mechanism of increased hK1 specific amidase activity in both type 1 DM and GDM patients, respectively.     

Tetrahydrobiopterin increases insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease

Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH(4)) is an essential cofactor of nitric oxide synthase that improves endothelial function in diabetics, smokers, and patients with hypercholesterolemia. Insulin resistance has been suggested as a contributing factor in the development of endothelial dysfunction via an abnormal pteridine metabolism. We hypothesized that BH(4) would restore flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD, endothelial-dependent vasodilation), which may affect insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. Thirty-two subjects (12 type 2 diabetic subjects, 10 matched nondiabetic subjects, and 10 healthy unmatched subjects) underwent infusion of BH(4) or saline in a random crossover study. Insulin sensitivity index (S(I)) was measured by hyperinsulinemic isoglycemic clamp. FMD was measured using ultrasonography. BH(4) significantly increased S(I) in the type 2 diabetics [3.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.9 +/- 0.7 x 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1)/(microU/ml), P < 0.05], while having no effects in nondiabetics [8.9 +/- 1.1 vs. 9.0 +/- 0.9 x 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1)/(microU/ml), P = 0.92] or in healthy subjects [17.5 +/- 1.6 vs. 18 +/- 1.8 x 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1)/(microU/ml), P = 0.87]. BH(4) did not affect the relative changes in brachial artery diameter from baseline FMD (%) in type 2 diabetic subjects (2.3 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.0%, P = 0.42), nondiabetic subjects (5.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.9%, P = 0.32), or healthy subjects (11.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 11.0 +/- 1.0%, P = 0.48). In conclusion, BH(4) significantly increases insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients without any discernible improvement in endothelial function.     

Lipid-lowering therapy in people with type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The risk of cardiovascular disease is markedly increased in people with type 2 diabetes. There is abundant epidemiological and clinical trial evidence that lipid abnormalities play a major role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic vascular disease in diabetes. Although the benefits of lipid-lowering therapy are well established in people without diabetes, the evidence in people with diabetes is not as well established. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent population studies of lipid-lowering therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes that included people with diabetes and performed a separate subgroup analysis were reviewed. Lipid lowering with statins and fibrates is effective in improving cardiovascular disease outcomes in diabetes, and their effectiveness is similar to that in the non-diabetic population. This effect is well established in secondary prevention and is accumulating for primary prevention. SUMMARY: Individuals with diabetes require aggressive management of dyslipidaemia as part of an overall management strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Individuals with a previous cardiovascular disease event should be on lipid-lowering therapy, whereas in those who have not had a previous cardiovascular disease event, the decision to use lipid-lowering therapy should be based on lipid levels and the overall risk of a future event. The results of large studies that are currently in progress specifically in people with diabetes should resolve outstanding questions in relation to lipid-lowering therapy in diabetes.     

Optimal initiation of insulin in type 2 diabetes

Treatment goals for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes are often not achieved or are difficult to maintain as the disease progresses. Too often, insulin therapy is either delayed or is suboptimal. We discuss how the introduction of new insulin analogs may help overcome some of the barriers to insulin use. If combination therapy with oral agents does not achieve glycemic control, the addition of a once-daily intermediate- or long-acting insulin is a simple and highly effective strategy for initiating insulin. If glycemic control is still not achieved, a short- or rapid-acting insulin may be needed prior to meals (basal-prandial approach). A patient's baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) can guide whether glycemic control can be achieved with basal insulin or will require basal-prandial replacement. In addition to A1C, a patient's age, lifestyle, competence, personal preferences, and comorbidities can be used to help determine the choice of insulin therapy.     

Liver steatosis coexists with myocardial insulin resistance and coronary dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes

Nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) is a common comorbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes and links to the risk of coronary syndromes. The aim was to determine the manifestations of metabolic syndrome in different organs in patients with liver steatosis. We studied 55 type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease using positron emission tomography. Myocardial perfusion was measured with [15O]H2O and myocardial and skeletal muscle glucose uptake with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose during hyperinsulinemic euglycemia. Liver fat content was determined by magnetic resonance proton spectroscopy. Patients were divided on the basis of their median (8%) into two groups with low (4.6 +/- 2.0%) and high (17.4 +/- 8.0%) liver fat content. The groups were well matched for age, BMI, and fasting plasma glucose. In addition to insulin resistance at the whole body level (P = 0.012) and muscle (P = 0.002), the high liver fat group had lower insulin-stimulated myocardial glucose uptake (P = 0.040) and glucose extraction rate (P = 0.0006) compared with the low liver fat group. In multiple regression analysis, liver fat content was the most significant explanatory variable for myocardial insulin resistance. In addition, the high liver fat group had increased concentrations of high sensitivity C-reactive protein, soluble forms of E-selectin, vascular adhesion protein-1, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (P < 0.05) and lower coronary flow reserve (P = 0.02) compared with the low liver fat group. In conclusion, in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease, liver fat content is a novel independent indicator of myocardial insulin resistance and reduced coronary functional capacity. Further studies will reveal the effect of hepatic fat reduction on myocardial metabolism and coronary function.