Crescent mastopexy and augmentation

We have defined a group of patients with a lesser degree of moderate breast ptosis whose ptosis correction is not adequately improved by augmentation alone but requires some elevation of the nipple-areola complex. We have selected the crescent excision mastopexy to provide this additional needed lift. Experience with 26 patients employing this technique has helped to define the indications and limitations for this approach. It seems to adequately provide the additional needed lift when nipple descent has been no more than 1.5 to 2 cm below the inframammary crease. Complications such as scar widening (46 percent) were reviewed, but seemed to be well tolerated by the patients.     

Witch's chin: a progressive, three-step technique

Witch's chin is an unpleasant aesthetic defect characterized by ptosis of premental tissue and a deep submental fold, which may be exaggerated by hyperprojection of the mandible. These three elements determine the different degrees of deformity; therefore, the ideal treatment should be directed to one, two, or all three of them. Despite unanimity on the surgical approach of the defect, a large variety of techniques have been proposed by various authors. The need to use a technique suitable for different clinical pictures, characterized by a progressive surgical aggression, as usually performed in this practice, has led to standardize a technique to correct witch's chin, by means of three progressive steps, depending on the degree of deformity. The advantage of this procedure is that once a good result has been achieved, the subsequent steps may be omitted. The technique has been successfully performed in five patients, and the mean follow-up is 12 months. Figures from two representative cases are presented.     

A minimally invasive approach for correction of chin ptosis

Although ptosis of the tip of the chin is common and can be seen in persons of any age, it is frequently seen in older patients seeking facial rejuvenation. A variety of techniques have been described to correct ptosis of the chin. The authors describe a minimally invasive method that can be used correct chin ptosis. This technique uses a small intraoral incision to place a U-shaped Prolene suture that gathers the soft tissue of the chin and elevates it above the lower border of the mandibular symphysis. A retrospective review of 314 cases performed in conjunction with face lifts between January of 1994 and January of 2000 was performed to evaluate this technique. There were no significant complications, and long-term results have been very satisfactory and lasting.     

Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis: dermal bra technique

A new technique for reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy techniques is presented, which the authors call the dermal bra. The surgical steps are described point by point. A series of 36 patients underwent reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy by means of this technique from January of 1998 to April of 2001. Thirty-two patients were followed; 28 presented satisfactory results, including a good mammary appearance, invisible scar, good and stable breast projection, and lasting results. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity was unchanged in all 32 patients. The overall complication rate was 12.5 percent (one patient suffered purse-string suture exposure, and three had a cutaneous rend). The advantages and disadvantages of this technique are discussed.     

Guidelines in concentric mastopexy

The scope and technique of concentric mastopexy remain unclear and controversial. In our hands, the procedure has application for mild nipple ptosis, glandular ptosis, and areola asymmetry, as well as the tuberous breast. Early disappointment has changed to increasing satisfaction as we have gained confidence in predicting our results based on the identification of three simple principles of concentric mastopexy. The first and most important, which states Doutside less than or equal to Doriginal + (Doriginal - Dinside), requires that the outer concentric circle must be drawn not to exceed the original areola diameter by more than the original areola diameter exceeds the inner concentric circle diameter. The second principle, Doutside less than or equal to 2 X Dinside, recommends that the outer circle diameter be drawn not to exceed twice that of the inner circle, to prevent poor scarring or over flattening of the breast. The third principle, Dfinal = 1/2(Doutside + Dinside), allows prediction of the final areola size as the average of the diameters of the inner and outer concentric circles. These three principles allow excision of a maximum amount of areola and periareola skin without the side effect of poor scars, dilated areola, or misshapened breasts. Applying these three principles to concentric mastopexy with or without augmentation mammaplasty, one may confidently correct a wide variety of deformities, producing more symmetrical, attractive breasts with areolae of a predictable size.     

Evaluating rejuvenation of the forehead and brow: an algorithm for selecting the appropriate technique

The traditional reason for performing aesthetic surgery in the forehead and brow area has been to correct brow ptosis. However, there are several other conditions that may be improved by surgery in this area, including frown muscle imbalance, transverse forehead rhytids, and lateral brow laxity. Recently, a better understanding of the relevant anatomy and the evolving therapeutic modalities (including both open and closed techniques) have contributed to a renewed interest in aesthetic surgery in the forehead and brow area. One hundred consecutive patients were studied, each of whom underwent forehead rejuvenation for one of four indications-forehead rhytids, glabellar creases, lateral brow laxity, or brow ptosis. Thirty-eight percent of patients underwent open procedures, 30 percent underwent closed procedures, and 32 percent underwent limited procedures. Complications occurred in 4 percent of patients, including three patients who were dissatisfied with the surgery and one patient who required scar revision. Based on our findings, we formulated an algorithm that integrates the different indications and any concomitant procedures being performed. Our proposed treatment plan is based on this information. The algorithm may be used as a template when assessing a patient and adapting the recommended intervention to the individual patient.     

Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty

A method of breast reduction is presented that maintains the blood supply and innervation to the nipple and areola complex by means of an inferior pedicle, reduces the breast volume by removing tissue from the periphery of the breast, maintains breast shape with internal plication sutures, and limits the scar using a periareolar technique with a short inferior vertical-to-oblique extension. There were 167 breasts in 98 patients reduced in this fashion. The average resection volume was 632 g per breast, with an average follow-up of 7.6 months. The complication rate was similar to that observed using traditional inferior pedicle techniques with the inverted-T cutaneous scar. This technique has proven to be versatile, technically straightforward, and applicable to breasts of all sizes for both breast reduction and mastopexy. By combining the aesthetic advantage of less cutaneous scarring with the safety and familiarity of the inferiorly based pedicle, superior results in breast reduction can be obtained that are consistent, long-lasting, and satisfying for both patient and surgeon alike.     

Dual-pedicle dermoparenchymal mastopexy

Mastopexy for treatment of breast ptosis, with or without augmentation or reduction, is often followed by recurrent ptosis. A new mastopexy technique is described which appears to offer long-term correction. After conservative resection of excess skin, the breast parenchyma is elevated from the chest wall, and redundant caudal deepithelialized breast tissue is divided into two equal (or unequal) superiorly based pedicles. These are criss-crossed (as in folding of arms), overlapped, and secured to the pectoral fascia in a position cephalad to the nipple-areolar complex. This technique, dual-pedicle dermoparenchymal mastopexy (DPM), forms a cone of the breast tissue and provides a "cradle" of support. It permits insertion of a prosthesis if needed. Based, in part, on concepts of traditional and more recently described pedicled breast reductions, it enjoys the advantage of preserving skin attachment to underlying unresected breast parenchyma. In addition, it repositions ptotically displaced breast parenchyma into a cephalad position and fixes it (the "pexy") to the chest wall. A 10-year experience is presented with representative cases to illustrate the basic mastopexy and its use with augmentation or reduction.     

External mastopexy with imbrication following explantation

The external mastopexy with inferior pull invagination is indicated in patients with grade II ptosis or greater and breast parenchyma less than 200 cc. Based on our experience with nine patients, the advantage of this technique is better inferior support with projection to the breast secondary to the imbrication.     

Breast deformities and mastopexy

LEARNING OBJECTIONS: After reviewing this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Appreciate the diversity of approaches for the correction of breast deformities and mastopexy. 2. Review the salient literature. 3. Understand patient selection criteria and indications. SUMMARY: Breast deformities and mastopexy continue to challenge plastic surgeons. Deformities such as Poland syndrome, tuberous breast, gynecomastia, and other congenital conditions are uncommon; therefore, management experience is often limited. Various techniques have been described, with no general consensus regarding optimal management. Mastopexy has become more common and is performed both with and without augmentation mammaplasty. However, a variety of techniques are available, and a thorough understanding of the indications, patient selection criteria, and techniques is important to optimize outcomes. This article will review these and other conditions to provide a better understanding of the current available data and evidence for these operations.     

"Zigzag" wavy-line periareolar incision

There is almost no mention of improvement in the aesthetics of areolar incisions in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature. The most visible area of the breast is the central mound; therefore, it behooves surgeons to make an areolar incision as inconspicuous as possible. Minimal incision breast operations and short-scar operations, such as mastopexy and vertical reduction mammaplasty, use a circumareolar incision. This circumareolar technique, which specifically avoids a purse-string support suture, is useful in all periareolar incisions. This method creates a scar that mimics the elusive, natural irregularity between the areola and periareolar skin. The goal is to have an irregular, random, wavy line that appears more natural. Between August of 1998 and August of 1999, 104 "zigzag" wavy-line procedures were performed. The complications seen in this series included delayed healing in four patients and hypertrophic scar in two patients. No scars were surgically revised. The results demonstrated a definite difference compared to a circular scar. The zigzag wavy-line technique complements the innovative methods that shorten scars while they create a more natural, lasting breast mound. For areolar incisions, good results are deceptively subtle, but unnatural results can be painfully obvious. The zigzag wavy-line incision subtly eludes the eye in diminishing the signs the patient has undergone an operation.     

Complete one-stage,immediate breast reconstruction with prosthetic material in patients with large or ptotic breasts

Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction is a relatively simple, quick procedure with no donor site morbidity. This report discusses immediate one-stage breast reconstruction using prostheses in 18 patients (19 breasts) who also required a contralateral reduction or mastopexy. In all cases, an inverted-T pattern was applied to both breasts. The mean age of the patients was 49 years (range, 32 to 62 years), and the mean size of the gel implant used was 330 ml (range, 120 to 550 ml); the implant was inserted in a total submuscular pocket in seven patients and subcutaneously in 11 patients. In two patients with multiple risk factors, the prosthesis extruded, and one patient required removal for a periprosthetic infection. In 10 patients with early stage disease (T1 or T2) with tumors more than 5 cm from the nipple-areola complex, the original areola (n = 3) or nipple-areola complex (n = 7) was retained as a full-thickness skin graft.The breast shape after submuscular prosthesis insertion is different than that of the contralateral breast after a mastopexy or reduction, and nipple-areola complex symmetry was difficult to obtain; thus, this technique was abandoned in favor of the subcutaneous position (using a modified Wise keyhole pattern with a de-epithelialized portion, which still allows two-layer closure).In the subgroup of patients with large breasts or marked ptosis, a single-stage breast reconstruction procedure can be performed with symmetrical incisions. The subcutaneous position allows for symmetrical shape and nipple-areola complex symmetry to be obtained. When the tumors are small and situated in the periphery of the breast, the nipple-areola complex may be retained as a full-thickness graft.     

Improving safety and aesthetic results in inverted T scar breast reduction

Breast reduction using an inverted T scar skin design and a variety of glandular pedicle types is widely practiced and is the standard by which more recent limited scar techniques are judged. The inverted T procedures are attractive because they are predictable and versatile and permit great control over both the extent of reduction and the breast-shaping process. Despite these advantages, common criticisms of inverted T scar techniques include breast shape abnormalities, areolar malposition, hypertrophic scars, and poor long-term projection. Preoperative markings influence both safety and aesthetics. A method of skin marking that is based on a displacement method to determine vertical limb splay angle is described. This design concept must be modified to address certain variants, such as macromastia presenting with normal nipple position or large-diameter areolae, moderately severe macromastia, and macromastia involving radiated breasts. Safety in breast reduction is improved by paying attention to patient positioning issues, using techniques that minimize blood loss, raising flaps of appropriate thickness in the correct plane, and performing resection by observing the principles that reduce the risk of compromise of nipple and areolar circulation. Aesthetic results are improved by analyzing vertical breast meridian lengths during final breast shaping, modifying areolar shape as necessary, and carefully tailoring the medial inframammary crease. The latter is also important for minimizing the potential for scar hypertrophy. The principles presented have been refined during the course of a 12-year experience with several hundred breast reduction procedures. They contribute to improved results in inverted T scar breast reduction when practiced consistently.     

Reduction mammaplasty with the "owl" incision and no undermining

Reduction mammaplasty has traditionally been done using the Wise pattern of incision. Because of the box-like effect in breast shape, the lack of projection, and the long scars associated with the inverted T incision, two techniques have emerged as alternatives: the vertical reduction of Lassus/Lejour and the "round block" periareolar technique popularized by Benelli. Each of these techniques has its pros and cons.The "owl" incision combines the features of the large periareolar reduction (Benelli's) and the vertical reduction (Lassus/Lejour); the horizontal inframammary scar is either made very short or completely eliminated. Volume reduction is done through a heart-shaped parenchymal resection, leaving the nipple-areolar complex over a supero-central pedicle. Maintenance of the central parenchyma behind the nipple-areolar complex and mobilization of the vertical pillars toward the center of the breast give excellent projection and diminish the lateral fullness. Enlargement of the periareolar skin resection diminishes the length and pleating of the vertical scar; conversely, inclusion of the vertical component to the periareolar technique eliminates the pleating effect of the periareolar incision. The short horizontal excision eliminates any resultant "dog ears" in the new inframammary fold. Thus, the discrepancy in the length of scars is better distributed. There is no skin or parenchymal undermining, so drains are not needed. Excellent results are obtained immediately on the operating table, and large volumes of glandular resection and correction of severe ptosis can be accomplished without compromising vascularity of either the nipple-areolar complex or the skin flaps.Ninety-four patients in a 7-year period were operated upon using this technique. Seventy-two had bilateral reductions up to 1900 gm per breast, 12 had unilateral reduction for symmetry following breast reconstruction, and 10 were patients with severe ptosis. Complications were rare and of a minor nature. No conversion to free grafts was done, even in the larger resections. One case required minor revision under local anesthesia, one case required bilateral re-reduction, and another case required unilateral re-reduction for continued growth of breast tissue. Almost 90 percent of the patients underwent procedures as outpatients.The owl-type incision and the supero-central pedicle flap are elements of a reduction mammaplasty technique that provides excellent projection and shape with minimal visible scars. It takes advantage of the positive features of the periareolar and vertical reduction techniques and minimizes their negative features. The new design of parenchymal resection improves the vascularity of the residual flaps. Additionally, it may better preserve the sensation to the nipple-areolar complex and lactation is not compromised.     

Endoscopic brow lift: a retrospective review of 628 consecutive cases over 5 years

Since its introduction in 1992, endoscopic brow lift has gained tremendous recognition because it has been promoted as a novel technique to correct brow ptosis as well as glabella rhytids in a minimally invasive manner with fewer complications than the classic coronal brow lift method. In this retrospective study, 628 endoscopic brow lift procedures performed over a 5-year period (1997-2001) at Manhattan Eye Ear and Throat Hospital were reviewed. The number of endoscopic brow lift procedures performed at this institution has declined 70 percent. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the causes of this striking trend by soliciting the opinions of 21 New York plastic surgeons on their current brow ptosis management. The response rate was 84 percent (21 of 25 surgeons contacted). Currently, 25 percent of the interviewed plastic surgeons perform endoscopic brow lift regularly, 50 percent of the plastic surgeons perform endoscopic brow lift occasionally, and 25 percent of the participants no longer perform endoscopic brow lift. While most patients (70 percent) were satisfied with their results, only 50 percent of the plastic surgeons were pleased with the long-term results (after more than 2 years of follow-up). Observed postsurgical complications of endoscopic brow lift included alopecia, hairline changes, infected hardware, brow asymmetry requiring surgical revision, prolonged forehead/brow paresthesia, frontal branch nerve paralysis, and scalp dysesthesia. These complications were similar to those resulting from open brow lifts. Seventy-one percent of the surveyed New York plastic surgeons routinely administered botulinum toxin type A (Botox) within 6 months of the endoscopic brow lift procedure. Possible explanations for the decline in the overall number of endoscopic brow lift procedures include the following: (1) the selection criteria for the ideal endoscopic brow lift patients are currently more limited; (2) other techniques equal or surpass endoscopic brow lift in effectiveness and predictability; and (3) endoscopic brow lift is ineffective in the majority of patients. There is no single superior surgical procedure for brow ptosis management available at this time.     

Neighboring flaps and cartilage grafts for correction of serious secondary nasal deformities

When the secondary nasal deformity is so serious that it presents loss of the soft structures, often its correction requires a neighboring flap besides the cartilage auto-grafts. In such serious cases, which are fortunately infrequent, the surgeon must resort to reconstructive techniques that typically provide very good results. Such is the case with the midforehead Indian flap, which rotated 180 degrees, allows reconstruction of the columella in the same surgical stage. In the same manner, Denonvilliers' flap may be employed to restore contour of the nasal ala, since its scar sequel is very acceptable, and Dieffenbach's flap may be used to reconstruct the columella. The flap of labial mucosa (which other authors have employed to correct septal perforations) is rotated 90 degrees to appose with another similar contralateral flap and is used to correct the seriously retracted columella. In this paper we present some cases that demanded the application of these techniques.     

Augmentation mammaplasty by means of the transrectus route

A new operative technique has been developed for augmentation mammaplasty. Through an inframammary incision, the anterior rectus sheath is entered, and the pocket is dissected in an entirely submuscular plane. We have performed this procedure in 112 patients to date. Complications have been few. The capsular contracture rate in 90 patients followed for greater than 1 year is 7 percent. The inframammary crease can be lowered using this technique, making mastopexy unnecessary in most patients with moderate ptosis.     

Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy

Gynecomastia is a benign enlargement of the male breast due to a physiological or pathological factor that interferes with the balance between estrogens and androgens in the serum. Gynecomastia itself requires no treatment unless the persistent enlargement of the male breast is a source of embarrassment and/or distress for the adolescent or adult man. The indications for the surgical treatment of gynecomastia are founded on two main objectives: (1) the restoration of male chest shape and (2) diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast lesions. The diagnostic evaluation begins with an adequate history and a thorough breast examination helped by laboratory tests and instrumental research. Several approaches for surgical treatment have been described in the literature. Some problems arise in patients who have significant enlargement and ptosis of the breast that will require skin reduction and in some patients requiring nipple-areola complex reduction. The authors believe that the complete circumareolar technique with purse-string suture creates the best aesthetic results, with fewer complications, in patients with moderate and severe ptotic glandular breast enlargements that have skin redundancy combined with areolar enlargement. From 1995 through 1999, a total of 10 male patients with moderate to severe gynecomastia were treated surgically using a complete circumareolar approach. All patients achieved a good aesthetic contour of the chest. Only two patients required a revision of the circumareolar scar to correct postoperative enlargement.     

A new technique for brachioplasty

A new technique for brachioplasty is proposed, aiming at correction of ptosis without excision. It is based on rolling a deepithelialized flap around from the rear and sliding it underneath the inside frontal skin of the arm, recreating the roundness of the arm and a firmer consistency. This technique has been utilized in 12 patients so far, with a follow-up ranging from 8 months to 4 years. No postoperative edema were observed, but one case of hyperesthesia appeared for a period of 2 months. The main preoccupation is scar sequelae, which must limit the intervention to patients clearly aware of the possibility of healing complications.