Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of RPA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its interaction with single-stranded DNA and SV40 T antigen

Replication protein A (RPA) is a three-subunit complex with multiple roles in DNA metabolism. DNA-binding domain A in the large subunit of human RPA (hRPA70A) binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and is responsible for the species-specific RPA–T antigen (T-ag) interaction required for Simian virus 40 replication. Although Saccharomyces cerevisiae RPA70A (scRPA70A) shares high sequence homology with hRPA70A, the two are not functionally equivalent. To elucidate the similarities and differences between these two homologous proteins, we determined the solution structure of scRPA70A, which closely resembled the structure of hRPA70A. The structure of ssDNA-bound scRPA70A, as simulated by residual dipolar coupling-based homology modeling, suggested that the positioning of the ssDNA is the same for scRPA70A and hRPA70A, although the conformational changes that occur in the two proteins upon ssDNA binding are not identical. NMR titrations of hRPA70A with T-ag showed that the T-ag binding surface is separate from the ssDNA-binding region and is more neutral than the corresponding part of scRPA70A. These differences might account for the species-specific nature of the hRPA70A–T-ag interaction. Our results provide insight into how these two homologous RPA proteins can exhibit functional differences, but still both retain their ability to bind ssDNA.     

A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways

Processing of DNA in replication, repair and recombination pathways in cells of all organisms requires the participation of at least one major single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein. This protein protects ssDNA from nucleolytic damage, prevents hairpin formation and blocks DNA reannealing until the processing pathway is successfully completed. Many ssDNA-binding proteins interact physically and functionally with a variety of other DNA processing proteins. These interactions are thought to temporally order and guide the parade of proteins that ‘trade places’ on the ssDNA, a model known as ‘hand-off’, as the processing pathway progresses. How this hand-off mechanism works remains poorly understood. Recent studies of the conserved eukaryotic ssDNA-binding protein replication protein A (RPA) suggest a novel mechanism by which proteins may trade places on ssDNA by binding to RPA and mediating conformation changes that alter the ssDNA-binding properties of RPA. This article reviews the structure and function of RPA, summarizes recent studies of RPA in DNA replication and other DNA processing pathways, and proposes a general model for the role of RPA in protein-mediated hand-off.     

Replication protein A as a major eukaryotic single-stranded DNA-binding protein and its role in DNA repair

Replication protein A (RPA) is a key regulator of eukaryotic DNA metabolism. RPA is a highly conserved heterotrimeric protein and contains multiple oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding folds. The major RPA function is binding to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates forming in DNA replication, repair, and recombination. Although binding ssDNA with high affinity, RPA can rapidly diffuse along ssDNA and destabilizes the DNA secondary structure. A highly dynamic RPA binding to ssDNA allows other proteins to access ssDNA and to displace RPA from the RPA–ssDNA complex. As has been shown recently, RPA in complex with ssDNA is posttranslationally modified in response to DNA damage. These modifications modulate the RPA interactions with its protein partners and control the DNA damage signaling pathways. The review considers up-to-date data on the RPA function as an active coordinator of ssDNA intermediate processing within DNA metabolic pathways, DNA repair in particular.     

Evidence for direct contact between the RPA3 subunit of the human replication protein A and single-stranded DNA

Replication Protein A is a single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding protein that is highly conserved in eukaryotes and plays essential roles in many aspects of nucleic acid metabolism, including replication, recombination, DNA repair and telomere maintenance. It is a heterotrimeric complex consisting of three subunits: RPA1, RPA2 and RPA3. It possesses four DNA-binding domains (DBD), DBD-A, DBD-B and DBD-C in RPA1 and DBD-D in RPA2, and it binds ssDNA via a multistep pathway. Unlike the RPA1 and RPA2 subunits, no ssDNA-RPA3 interaction has as yet been observed although RPA3 contains a structural motif found in the other DBDs. We show here using 4-thiothymine residues as photoaffinity probe that RPA3 interacts directly with ssDNA on the 3′-side on a 31 nt ssDNA.The replication protein A (RPA) is a single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding protein that is highly conserved in eukaryotes (1–3). RPA is one of the key players in various essential processes of DNA metabolism including replication, recombination, DNA repair and telomere maintenance (1,2,4–9). The functions of this protein are based on its DNA-binding activity and specific protein–protein interactions. Its ssDNA binding properties depend on DNA length and nucleotide sequence (6,10–13). RPA is a heterotrimeric protein, composed of 70-, 32- and 14-kDa subunits, commonly referred to as RPA1, RPA2 and RPA3, respectively. There are four DNA-binding domains (DBD) located in RPA1 (DBD A, DBD B, DBD C and DBD F), one located in RPA2 (DBD D) and one belongs to RPA3 (DBD E). RPA interacts with ssDNA via four DBD: DBD A, DBD B, DBD C and DBD D (14).It is now accepted (11) that RPA binds to ssDNA in a sequential pathway with a defined polarity (15–17). RPA binds ssDNA with three different binding modes. First, binding initially involves an unstable recognition site of 8–10 nt with the high-affinity DBD A and DBD B domains on the 5′-side of the occluded ssDNA; it is designated ‘compact conformation’ or 8–10 nt binding mode. Second, this step is followed by the weaker binding of DBD C, on the 3′-side, leading to an intermediate or ‘elongated contracted’ (13–22 nt) binding mode (18–19). Finally binding of DBD D on the 3′-side forms a stable ‘elongated extended’ complex characterized by a 30 nt long occluded binding site (30 nt binding mode). Although RPA3 contains an Oligonucleotide-Binding (OB)-fold motif found in the other DBDs, there is presently no biochemical evidence that this subunit directly contacts DNA. Thus positioning of the RPA3 subunit relative to the other domains is still speculative (11,20). It has been clearly demonstrated that RPA3 is crucial for RPA function (1,2): RPA3 is involved in heterotrimer formation and is responsible for the polarity of binding to DNA (11,21,22). The scope of the data indicates that either RPA3 participates only in protein–protein interactions or that putative interaction of RPA3 with ssDNA is unstable and too transient to be detected by standard biochemical experiments. This latter possibility is likely if such interaction is provided by the 3′-side of the ssDNA, since it has been suggested that this region might be transiently accessible to the RPA DBD domains (23,24).In the past few years, thionucleobases have been extensively used as intrinsic photolabels to probe the structure in solution of folded molecules and to identify transient contacts within nucleic acids and/or between nucleic acids and proteins, in nucleoprotein assemblies (25). Thio residues such as 4-thiothymine and 6-thioguanine absorb light at wavelengths longer than 320 nm, and thus can be selectively photo-activated. Owing to the high photo-reactivity of their triplet state, they exhibit high photo-cross-linking ability towards nucleic acid bases as well as towards amino acid residues. Here we used a combination of approaches including gel retardation assays, chemical cross-linking and cross-linking with photoreactive ssDNA probes containing 4-thiothymine, introduced at a defined site in the sequence of the ssDNA, to study interactions present in human RPA (hRPA): ssDNA complexes. These studies coupled with the identification of cross-linked targets using specific antibodies revealed that in the elongated extended hRPA:ssDNA complex RPA3 closely contacts the 3′-end positioned nucleotide and yields a covalent adduct with zero-length photolabel.     

Diffusion of Human Replication Protein A along Single-Stranded DNA

Replication protein A (RPA) is a eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein that plays critical roles in most aspects of genome maintenance, including replication, recombination and repair. RPA binds ssDNA with high affinity, destabilizes DNA secondary structure and facilitates binding of other proteins to ssDNA. However, RPA must be removed from or redistributed along ssDNA during these processes. To probe the dynamics of RPA–DNA interactions, we combined ensemble and single-molecule fluorescence approaches to examine human RPA (hRPA) diffusion along ssDNA and find that an hRPA heterotrimer can diffuse rapidly along ssDNA. Diffusion of hRPA is functional in that it provides the mechanism by which hRPA can transiently disrupt DNA hairpins by diffusing in from ssDNA regions adjacent to the DNA hairpin. hRPA diffusion was also monitored by the fluctuations in fluorescence intensity of a Cy3 fluorophore attached to the end of ssDNA. Using a novel method to calibrate the Cy3 fluorescence intensity as a function of hRPA position on the ssDNA, we estimate a one-dimensional diffusion coefficient of hRPA on ssDNA of D₁ ~ 5000 nt² s^− 1 at 37 °C. Diffusion of hRPA while bound to ssDNA enables it to be readily repositioned to allow other proteins access to ssDNA.     

Replication protein A interactions with DNA. 2. Characterization of double-stranded DNA-binding/helix-destabilization activities and the role of the zinc-finger domain in DNA interactions

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein that is composed of subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa. RPA is required for multiple processes in cellular DNA metabolism. RPA has been reported to (1) bind with high affinity to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), (2) bind specifically to certain double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) sequences, and (3) have DNA helix-destabilizing ("unwinding") activity. We have characterized both dsDNA binding and helix destabilization. The affinity of RPA for dsDNA was lower than that of ssDNA and precisely correlated with the melting temperature of the DNA fragment. The rates of helix destabilization and dsDNA binding were similar, and both were slow relative to the rate of binding ssDNA. We have previously mapped the regions required for ssDNA binding [Walther et al. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 3963-3973]. Here, we show that both helix-destabilization and dsDNA-binding activities map to the central DNA-binding domain of the 70-kDa subunit and that other domains of RPA are needed for optimal activity. We conclude that all types of RPA binding are manifestations of RPA ssDNA-binding activity and that dsDNA binding occurs when RPA destabilizes a region of dsDNA and binds to the resulting ssDNA. The 70-kDa subunit of all RPA homologues contains a highly conserved putative (C-X2-C-X13-C-X2-C) zinc finger. This motif directly interacts with DNA and contributes to dsDNA-binding/unwinding activity. Evidence is presented that a metal ion is required for the function of the zinc-finger motif.     

Structural insights into the unique single-stranded DNA-binding mode of Helicobacter pylori DprA

Natural transformation (NT) in bacteria is a complex process, including binding, uptake, transport and recombination of exogenous DNA into the chromosome, consequently generating genetic diversity and driving evolution. DNA processing protein A (DprA), which is distributed among virtually all bacterial species, is involved in binding to the internalized single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and promoting the loading of RecA on ssDNA during NTs. Here we present the structures of DNA_processg_A (DprA) domain of the Helicobacter pylori DprA (HpDprA) and its complex with an ssDNA at 2.20 and 1.80 Å resolutions, respectively. The complex structure revealed for the first time how the conserved DprA domain binds to ssDNA. Based on structural comparisons and binding assays, a unique ssDNA-binding mode is proposed: the dimer of HpDprA binds to ssDNA through two small, positively charged binding pockets of the DprA domains with classical Rossmann folds and the key residue Arg52 is re-oriented to ‘open’ the pocket in order to accommodate one of the bases of ssDNA, thus enabling HpDprA to grasp substrate with high affinity. This mode is consistent with the oligomeric composition of the complex as shown by electrophoretic mobility-shift assays and static light scattering measurements, but differs from the direct polymeric complex of Streptococcus pneumoniae DprA–ssDNA.     

Structure of the major single-stranded DNA-binding domain of replication protein A suggests a dynamic mechanism for DNA binding

Although structures of single-stranded (ss)DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) have been reported with and without ssDNA, the mechanism of ssDNA binding in eukarya remains speculative. Here we report a 2.5 Angstroms structure of the ssDNA-binding domain of human replication protein A (RPA) (eukaryotic SSB), for which we previously reported a structure in complex with ssDNA. A comparison of free and bound forms of RPA revealed that ssDNA binding is associated with a major reorientation between, and significant conformational changes within, the structural modules--OB-folds--which comprise the DNA-binding domain. Two OB-folds, whose tandem orientation was stabilized by the presence of DNA, adopted multiple orientations in its absence. Within the OB-folds, extended loops implicated in DNA binding significantly changed conformation in the absence of DNA. Analysis of intermolecular contacts suggested the possibility that other RPA molecules and/or other proteins could compete with DNA for the same binding site. Using this mechanism, protein-protein interactions can regulate, and/or be regulated by DNA binding. Combined with available biochemical data, this structure also suggested a dynamic model for the DNA-binding mechanism.     

Replication protein A interactions with DNA. III. Molecular basis of recognition of damaged DNA

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein (subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa) that is required for cellular DNA metabolism. RPA has been reported to interact specifically with damaged double-stranded DNA and to participate in multiple steps of nucleotide excision repair (NER) including the damage recognition step. We have examined the mechanism of RPA binding to both single-stranded and double-stranded DNA (ssDNA and dsDNA, respectively) containing damage. We show that the affinity of RPA for damaged dsDNA correlated with disruption of the double helix by the damaged bases and required RPAs ssDNA-binding activity. We conclude that RPA is recognizing single-stranded character caused by the damaged nucleotides. We also show that RPA binds specifically to damaged ssDNA. The specificity of binding varies with the type of damage with RPA having up to a 60-fold preference for a pyrimidine(6-4)pyrimidone photoproduct. We show that this specific binding was absolutely dependent on the zinc-finger domain in the C-terminus of the 70-kDa subunit. The affinity of RPA for damaged ssDNA was 5 orders of magnitude higher than that of the damage recognition protein XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein). These findings suggest that RPA probably binds to both damaged and undamaged strands in the NER excision complex. RPA binding may be important for efficient excision of damaged DNA in NER.     

STN1 OB Fold Mutation Alters DNA Binding and Affects Selective Aspects of CST Function

Mammalian CST (CTC1-STN1-TEN1) participates in multiple aspects of telomere replication and genome-wide recovery from replication stress. CST resembles Replication Protein A (RPA) in that it binds ssDNA and STN1 and TEN1 are structurally similar to RPA2 and RPA3. Conservation between CTC1 and RPA1 is less apparent. Currently the mechanism underlying CST action is largely unknown. Here we address CST mechanism by using a DNA-binding mutant, (STN1 OB-fold mutant, STN1-OBM) to examine the relationship between DNA binding and CST function. In vivo, STN1-OBM affects resolution of endogenous replication stress and telomere duplex replication but telomeric C-strand fill-in and new origin firing after exogenous replication stress are unaffected. These selective effects indicate mechanistic differences in CST action during resolution of different replication problems. In vitro binding studies show that STN1 directly engages both short and long ssDNA oligonucleotides, however STN1-OBM preferentially destabilizes binding to short substrates. The finding that STN1-OBM affects binding to only certain substrates starts to explain the in vivo separation of function observed in STN1-OBM expressing cells. CST is expected to engage DNA substrates of varied length and structure as it acts to resolve different replication problems. Since STN1-OBM will alter CST binding to only some of these substrates, the mutant should affect resolution of only a subset of replication problems, as was observed in the STN1-OBM cells. The in vitro studies also provide insight into CST binding mechanism. Like RPA, CST likely contacts DNA via multiple OB folds. However, the importance of STN1 for binding short substrates indicates differences in the architecture of CST and RPA DNA-protein complexes. Based on our results, we propose a dynamic DNA binding model that provides a general mechanism for CST action at diverse forms of replication stress.     

Structural mechanism of RPA loading on DNA during activation of a simple pre-replication complex

We report that during activation of the simian virus 40 (SV40) pre-replication complex, SV40 T antigen (Tag) helicase actively loads replication protein A (RPA) on emerging single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). This novel loading process requires physical interaction of Tag origin DNA-binding domain (OBD) with the RPA high-affinity ssDNA-binding domains (RPA70AB). Heteronuclear NMR chemical shift mapping revealed that Tag-OBD binds to RPA70AB at a site distal from the ssDNA-binding sites and that RPA70AB, Tag-OBD, and an 8-nucleotide ssDNA form a stable ternary complex. Intact RPA and Tag also interact stably in the presence of an 8-mer, but Tag dissociates from the complex when RPA binds to longer oligonucleotides. Together, our results imply that an allosteric change in RPA quaternary structure completes the loading reaction. A mechanistic model is proposed in which the ternary complex is a key intermediate that directly couples origin DNA unwinding to RPA loading on emerging ssDNA.     

Helicase binding to DnaI exposes a cryptic DNA-binding site during helicase loading in Bacillus subtilis

The Bacillus subtilis DnaI, DnaB and DnaD proteins load the replicative ring helicase DnaC onto DNA during priming of DNA replication. Here we show that DnaI consists of a C-terminal domain (Cd) with ATPase and DNA-binding activities and an N-terminal domain (Nd) that interacts with the replicative ring helicase. A Zn²⁺-binding module mediates the interaction with the helicase and C67, C70 and H84 are involved in the coordination of the Zn²⁺. DnaI binds ATP and exhibits ATPase activity that is not stimulated by ssDNA, because the DNA-binding site on Cd is masked by Nd. The ATPase activity resides on the Cd domain and when detached from the Nd domain, it becomes sensitive to stimulation by ssDNA because its cryptic DNA-binding site is exposed. Therefore, Nd acts as a molecular ‘switch’ regulating access to the ssDNA binding site on Cd, in response to binding of the helicase. DnaI is sufficient to load the replicative helicase from a complex with six DnaI molecules, so there is no requirement for a dual helicase loader system.     

Analysis of the human replication protein A:Rad52 complex: evidence for crosstalk between RPA32, RPA70, Rad52 and DNA

The eukaryotic single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), is essential for DNA replication, and plays important roles in DNA repair and DNA recombination. Rad52 and RPA, along with other members of the Rad52 epistasis group of genes, repair double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). Two repair pathways involve RPA and Rad52, homologous recombination and single-strand annealing. Two binding sites for Rad52 have been identified on RPA. They include the previously identified C-terminal domain (CTD) of RPA32 (residues 224-271) and the newly identified domain containing residues 169-326 of RPA70. A region on Rad52, which includes residues 218-303, binds RPA70 as well as RPA32. The N-terminal region of RPA32 does not appear to play a role in the formation of the RPA:Rad52 complex. It appears that the RPA32CTD can substitute for RPA70 in binding Rad52. Sequence homology between RPA32 and RPA70 was used to identify a putative Rad52-binding site on RPA70 that is located near DNA-binding domains A and B. Rad52 binding to RPA increases ssDNA affinity significantly. Mutations in DBD-D on RPA32 show that this domain is primarily responsible for the ssDNA binding enhancement. RPA binding to Rad52 inhibits the higher-order self-association of Rad52 rings. Implications for these results for the "hand-off" mechanism between protein-protein partners, including Rad51, in homologous recombination and single-strand annealing are discussed.     

Functional interactions among yeast Rad51 recombinase, Rad52 mediator, and replication protein A in DNA strand exchange

Rad51-catalyzed DNA strand exchange is greatly enhanced by the single-stranded (ss) DNA binding factor RPA if the latter is introduced after Rad51 has already nucleated onto the initiating ssDNA substrate. Paradoxically, co-addition of RPA with Rad51 to the ssDNA to mimic the in vivo situation diminishes the level of strand exchange, revealing competition between RPA and Rad51 for binding sites on ssDNA. Rad52 promotes strand exchange but only when there is a need for Rad51 to compete with RPA for loading onto ssDNA. Rad52 is multimeric, binds ssDNA, and targets Rad51 to ssDNA. Maximal restoration of pairing and strand exchange requires amounts of Rad52 substoichiometric to Rad51 and involves a stable, equimolar complex between Rad51 and Rad52. The Rad51-Rad52 complex efficiently utilizes a ssDNA template saturated with RPA for homologous pairing but does not appear to be more active than Rad51 when an RPA-free ssDNA template is used. Rad52 does not substitute for RPA in the pairing and strand exchange reaction nor does it lower the dependence of the reaction on Rad51 or RPA.     

Replication protein A complex in Thermococcus kodakarensis interacts with DNA polymerases and helps their effective strand synthesis

Replication protein A (RPA) is an essential component of DNA metabolic processes. RPA binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and interacts with multiple DNA-binding proteins. In this study, we showed that two DNA polymerases, PolB and PolD, from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis interact directly with RPA in vitro. RPA was expected to play a role in resolving the secondary structure, which may stop the DNA synthesis reaction, in the template ssDNA. Our in vitro DNA synthesis assay showed that the pausing was resolved by RPA for both PolB and PolD. These results supported the fact that RPA interacts with DNA polymerases as a member of the replisome and is involved in the normal progression of DNA replication forks.     

NMR study on the interaction between RPA and DNA decamer containing cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer in the presence of XPA: implication for damage verification and strand-specific dual incision in nucleotide excision repair

In mammalian cells, nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the major pathway for the removal of bulky DNA adducts. Many of the key NER proteins are members of the XP family (XPA, XPB, etc.), which was named on the basis of its association with the disorder xerodoma pigmentosum. Human replication protein A (RPA), the ubiquitous single-stranded DNA-binding protein, is another of the essential proteins for NER. RPA stimulates the interaction of XPA with damaged DNA by forming an RPA–XPA complex on damaged DNA sites. Binding of RPA to the undamaged DNA strand is most important during NER, because XPA, which directs the excision nucleases XPG and XPF, must bind to the damaged strand. In this study, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to assess the binding of the tandem high affinity DNA-binding domains, RPA-AB, and of the isolated domain RPA-A, to normal DNA and damaged DNA containing the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) lesion. Both RPA-A and RPA-AB were found to bind non- specifically to both strands of normal and CPD- containing DNA duplexes. There were no differences observed when binding to normal DNA duplex was examined in the presence of the minimal DNA-binding domain of XPA (XPA-MBD). However, there is a drastic difference for CPD-damaged DNA duplex as both RPA-A and RPA-AB bind specifically to the undamaged strand. The strand-specific binding of RPA and XPA to the damaged duplex DNA shows that RPA and XPA play crucial roles in damage verification and guiding cleavage of damaged DNA during NER.     

Replication protein A interactions with DNA. 1. Functions of the DNA-binding and zinc-finger domains of the 70-kDa subunit

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a multiple subunit single-stranded DNA-binding protein that is required for multiple processes in cellular DNA metabolism. This complex, composed of subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa, binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with high affinity and participates in multiple protein-protein interactions. The 70-kDa subunit of RPA is known to be composed of multiple domains: an N-terminal domain that participates in protein interactions, a central DNA-binding domain (composed of two copies of a ssDNA-binding motif), a putative (C-X2-C-X13-C-X2-C) zinc finger, and a C-terminal intersubunit interaction domain. A series of mutant forms of RPA were used to elucidate the roles of these domains in RPA function. The central DNA-binding domain was necessary and sufficient for interactions with ssDNA; however, adjacent sequences, including the zinc-finger domain and part of the N-terminal domain, were needed for optimal ssDNA-binding activity. The role of aromatic residues in RPA-DNA interactions was examined. Mutation of any one of the four aromatic residues shown to interact with ssDNA had minimal effects on RPA activity, indicating that individually these residues are not critical for RPA activity. Mutation of the zinc-finger domain altered the structure of the RPA complex, reduced ssDNA-binding activity, and eliminated activity in DNA replication.     

Rtt105 functions as a chaperone for replication protein A to preserve genome stability

Generation of single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) is required for the template strand formation during DNA replication. Replication Protein A (RPA) is an ssDNA‐binding protein essential for protecting ssDNA at replication forks in eukaryotic cells. While significant progress has been made in characterizing the role of the RPA–ssDNA complex, how RPA is loaded at replication forks remains poorly explored. Here, we show that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein regulator of Ty1 transposition 105 (Rtt105) binds RPA and helps load it at replication forks. Cells lacking Rtt105 exhibit a dramatic reduction in RPA loading at replication forks, compromised DNA synthesis under replication stress, and increased genome instability. Mechanistically, we show that Rtt105 mediates the RPA–importin interaction and also promotes RPA binding to ssDNA directly in vitro, but is not present in the final RPA–ssDNA complex. Single‐molecule studies reveal that Rtt105 affects the binding mode of RPA to ssDNA. These results support a model in which Rtt105 functions as an RPA chaperone that escorts RPA to the nucleus and facilitates its loading onto ssDNA at replication forks.     

The role for zinc in replication protein A

Heterotrimeric human single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), is a central player in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. The C terminus of the largest subunit, RPA70, contains a putative zinc-binding motif and is implicated in complex formation with two smaller subunits, RPA14 and RPA32. The C-terminal domain of RPA70 (RPA70-CTD) was characterized using proteolysis and x-ray fluorescence emission spectroscopy. The proteolytic core of this domain comprised amino acids 432-616. X-ray fluorescence spectra revealed that RPA70-CTD possesses a coordinated Zn(II). The trimeric complex of RPA70-CTD, the ssDNA-binding domain of RPA32 (amino acids 43-171), and RPA14 had strong DNA binding activity. When properly coordinated with zinc, the trimer's affinity to ssDNA was only 3-10-fold less than that of the ssDNA-binding domain in the middle of RPA70. However, the DNA-binding activity of the trimer was dramatically reduced in the presence of chelating agents. Our data indicate that (i) Zn(II) is essential to stabilize the tertiary structure of RPA70-CTD; (ii) RPA70-CTD possesses DNA-binding activity, which is modulated by Zn(II); and (iii) ssDNA binding by the trimer is a synergistic effect generated by the RPA70-CTD and RPA32.     

Physical interaction between replication protein A and Rad51 promotes exchange on single-stranded DNA

Replication protein A (RPA) is displaced from single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) by Rad51 during the initiation of homologous recombination. Interactions between these proteins have been reported, but the functional significance of the direct RPA-Rad51 interaction has yet to be elucidated. We have identified and characterized the interaction between DNA-binding domain A of RPA (RPA70A) and the N-terminal domain of Rad51 (Rad51N). NMR chemical shift mapping showed that Rad51N binds to the ssDNA-binding site of RPA70A, suggesting a competitive mechanism for the displacement of RPA from ssDNA by Rad51. A structure of the RPA70A-Rad51N complex was generated by experimentally guided modeling and then used to design mutations that disrupt the binding interface. Functional ATP hydrolysis assays were performed for wild-type Rad51 and a mutant defective in binding RPA. Rates of RPA displacement for the mutant were significantly below those of wild-type Rad51, suggesting that a direct RPA-Rad51 interaction is involved in displacing RPA in the initiation stage of genetic recombination.