Functional competition within a membrane: Lipid recognition vs. transmembrane helix oligomerization

Binding of specific lipids to large, polytopic membrane proteins is well described, and it is clear that such lipids are crucial for protein stability and activity. In contrast, binding of defined lipid species to individual transmembrane helices and regulation of transmembrane helix monomer–oligomer equilibria by binding of distinct lipids is a concept, which has emerged only lately. Lipids bind to single-span membrane proteins, both in the juxta-membrane region as well as in the hydrophobic membrane core. While some interactions counteract transmembrane helix oligomerization, in other cases lipid binding appears to enhance oligomerization. As reversible oligomerization is involved in activation of many membrane proteins, binding of defined lipids to single-span transmembrane proteins might be a mechanism to regulate and/or fine-tune the protein activity. But how could lipid binding trigger the activity of a protein? How can binding of a single lipid molecule to a transmembrane helix affect the structure of a transmembrane helix oligomer, and consequently its signaling state? These questions are discussed in the present article based on recent results obtained with simple, single-span transmembrane proteins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Lipid–protein interactions.     

Lipid-protein interactions and the function of the Ca2+-ATPase of sarcoplasmic reticulum

Regardless of the nature of the protein constituents of membranes, the molecular arrangement of lipids interacting with them must satisfy hydrophobic, ionic, and steric requirements. Biological membranes have a great diversity of lipid constituents, and this diversity might have functional roles. It has been proposed, for example, that the hydrophobic regions of membrane proteins are stabilized in the membrane through interactions with lipids able to adopt configurations other than the bilayer structure. Progress in understanding at the molecular level how lipid-protein interactions control the properties of membrane proteins has been hindered by the lack of information concerning the structure of the hydrophobic regions of membrane proteins. Nevertheless, there are many examples in the literature describing how changes in the lipid environment affect physical and biochemical properties of membrane proteins. From these studies, discussed in this review, an overall picture of how lipids and proteins interact in membranes is beginning to emerge.     

Membrane contact probability: An essential and predictive character for the structural and functional studies of membrane proteins

One of the unique traits of membrane proteins is that a significant fraction of their hydrophobic amino acids is exposed to the hydrophobic core of lipid bilayers rather than being embedded in the protein interior, which is often not explicitly considered in the protein structure and function predictions. Here, we propose a characteristic and predictive quantity, the membrane contact probability (MCP), to describe the likelihood of the amino acids of a given sequence being in direct contact with the acyl chains of lipid molecules. We show that MCP is complementary to solvent accessibility in characterizing the outer surface of membrane proteins, and it can be predicted for any given sequence with a machine learning-based method by utilizing a training dataset extracted from MemProtMD, a database generated from molecular dynamics simulations for the membrane proteins with a known structure. As the first of many potential applications, we demonstrate that MCP can be used to systematically improve the prediction precision of the protein contact maps and structures.     

A lipidic-sponge phase screen for membrane protein crystallization

A major current deficit in structural biology is the lack of high-resolution structures of eukaryotic membrane proteins, many of which are key drug targets for the treatment of disease. Numerous eukaryotic membrane proteins require specific lipids for their stability and activity, and efforts to crystallize and solve the structures of membrane proteins that do not address the issue of lipids frequently end in failure rather than success. To help address this problem, we have developed a sparse matrix crystallization screen consisting of 48 lipidic-sponge phase conditions. Sponge phases form liquid lipid bilayer environments which are suitable for conventional hanging- and sitting-drop crystallization experiments. Using the sponge phase screen, we obtained crystals of several different membrane proteins from bacterial and eukaryotic sources. We also demonstrate how the screen may be manipulated by incorporating specific lipids such as cholesterol; this modification led to crystals being recovered from a bacterial photosynthetic core complex.     

Lipid Sorting and Multivesicular Endosome Biogenesis

Intracellular organelles, including endosomes, show differences not only in protein but also in lipid composition. It is becoming clear from the work of many laboratories that the mechanisms necessary to achieve such lipid segregation can operate at very different levels, including the membrane biophysical properties, the interactions with other lipids and proteins, and the turnover rates or distribution of metabolic enzymes. In turn, lipids can directly influence the organelle membrane properties by changing biophysical parameters and by recruiting partner effector proteins involved in protein sorting and membrane dynamics. In this review, we will discuss how lipids are sorted in endosomal membranes and how they impact on endosome functions.It is now well established that membranes along the endocytic and secretory pathway show differences not only in protein but also in lipid composition. For example, lipid gradients exist along the biosynthetic pathway with increasing density of cholesterol and sphingolipids from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the plasma membrane (Maxfield and van Meer 2010). Also, phosphoinositides show distributions restricted to relatively well-characterized membrane territories (Di Paolo and De Camilli 2006). Given the facts that lipids are small and contain little structural information when compared with proteins, that they can diffuse rapidly within membranes, and that membranes are connected by membrane flow during transport, it is not always obvious how different lipids are segregated from each other.In this article, we will evoke different mechanisms that may contribute to the heterogeneous lipid composition of endocytic membranes, including physicochemical properties of the membrane, interactions with other proteins or lipids, and synthesis or degradation. In addition, it has also become apparent that peripheral membrane proteins often interact with membranes via diverse lipid-binding motifs, and thus that lipids directly contribute to the distribution of many peripheral membrane proteins. For example, phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI(3)P) is detected predominantly on early endosomes, where most characterized PI(3)P-binding proteins encoded by the human genome are found as well (Raiborg et al. 2013). We will also discuss how some lipids may regulate protein sorting and membrane transport within the endosomal system.     

Interactions between misfolded protein oligomers and membranes: A central topic in neurodegenerative diseases?

The deposition of amyloid material has been associated with many different diseases. Although these diseases are very diverse the amyloid material share many common features such as cross-β-sheet structure of the backbone of the proteins deposited. Another common feature of the aggregation process for a wide variety of proteins is the presence of prefibrillar oligomers. These oligomers are linked to the cytotoxicity occurring during the aggregation of proteins. These prefibrillar oligomers interact extensively with lipid membranes and in some cases leads to destabilization of lipid membranes. This interaction is however highly dependent on the nature of both the oligomer and the lipids. Anionic lipids are often required for interaction with the lipid membrane while increased exposure of hydrophobic patches from highly dynamic protein oligomers are structural determinants of cytotoxicity of the oligomers. To explore the oligomer lipid interaction in detail the interaction between oligomers of α-synuclein and the 4th fasciclin-1 domain of TGFBIp with lipid membranes will be examined here. For both proteins the dynamic species are the ones causing membrane destabilization and the membrane interaction is primarily seen when the lipid membranes contain anionic lipids. Hence the dynamic nature of oligomers with exposed hydrophobic patches alongside the presence of anionic lipids could be essential for the cytotoxicity observed for prefibrillar oligomers in general. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Lipid–protein interactions.     

Lipid-protein interactions

Intrinsic membrane proteins are solvated by a shell of lipid molecules interacting with the membrane-penetrating surface of the protein; these lipid molecules are referred to as annular lipids. Lipid molecules are also found bound between transmembrane α-helices; these are referred to as non-annular lipids. Annular lipid binding constants depend on fatty acyl chain length, but the dependence is less than expected from models based on distortion of the lipid bilayer alone. This suggests that hydrophobic matching between a membrane protein and the surrounding lipid bilayer involves some distortion of the transmembrane α-helical bundle found in most membrane proteins, explaining the importance of bilayer thickness for membrane protein function. Annular lipid binding constants also depend on the structure of the polar headgroup region of the lipid, and hotspots for binding anionic lipids have been detected on some membrane proteins; binding of anionic lipid molecules to these hotspots can be functionally important. Binding of anionic lipids to non-annular sites on membrane proteins such as the potassium channel KcsA can also be important for function. It is argued that the packing preferences of the membrane-spanning α-helices in a membrane protein result in a structure that matches nicely with that of the surrounding lipid bilayer, so that lipid and protein can meet without either having to change very much.     

Setting up and running molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins

Molecular dynamics simulations have become a popular and powerful technique to study lipids and membrane proteins. We present some general questions and issues that should be considered prior to embarking on molecular dynamics simulation studies of membrane proteins and review common simulation methods. We suggest a practical approach to setting up and running simulations of membrane proteins, and introduce two new (related) methods to embed a protein in a lipid bilayer. Both methods rely on placing lipids and the protein(s) on a widely spaced grid and then 'shrinking' the grid until the bilayer with the protein has the desired density, with lipids neatly packed around the protein. When starting from a grid based on a single lipid structure, or several potentially different lipid structures (method 1), the bilayer will start well-packed but requires more equilibration. When starting from a pre-equilibrated bilayer, either pure or mixed, most of the structure of the bilayer stays intact, reducing equilibration time (method 2). The main advantages of these methods are that they minimize equilibration time and can be almost completely automated, nearly eliminating one time consuming step in MD simulations of membrane proteins.     

More Than a Pore: The Interplay of Pore-Forming Proteins and Lipid Membranes

Pore-forming proteins (PFPs) punch holes in their target cell membrane to alter their permeability. Permeabilization of lipid membranes by PFPs has received special attention to study the basic molecular mechanisms of protein insertion into membranes and the development of biotechnological tools. PFPs act through a general multi-step mechanism that involves (i) membrane partitioning, (ii) insertion into the hydrophobic core of the bilayer, (iii) oligomerization, and (iv) pore formation. Interestingly, PFPs and membranes show a dynamic interplay. As PFPs are usually produced as soluble proteins, they require a large conformational change for membrane insertion. Moreover, membrane structure is modified upon PFPs insertion. In this context, the toroidal pore model has been proposed to describe a pore architecture in which not only protein molecules but also lipids are directly involved in the structure. Here, we discuss how PFPs and lipids cooperate and remodel each other to achieve pore formation, and explore new evidences of protein-lipid pore structures.     

Non-covalent binding of membrane lipids to membrane proteins

Polar lipids and membrane proteins are major components of biological membranes, both cell membranes and membranes of enveloped viruses. How these two classes of membrane components interact with each other to influence the function of biological membranes is a fundamental question that has attracted intense interest since the origins of the field of membrane studies. One of the most powerful ideas that driven the field is the likelihood that lipids bind to membrane proteins at specific sites, modulating protein structure and function. However only relatively recently has high resolution structure determination of membrane proteins progressed to the point of providing atomic level structure of lipid binding sites on membrane proteins. Analysis of X-ray diffraction, electron crystallography and NMR data over 100 specific lipid binding sites on membrane proteins. These data demonstrate tight lipid binding of both phospholipids and cholesterol to membrane proteins. Membrane lipids bind to membrane proteins by their headgroups, or by their acyl chains, or binding is mediated by the entire lipid molecule. When headgroups bind, binding is stabilized by polar interactions between lipid headgroups and the protein. When acyl chains bind, van der Waals effects dominate as the acyl chains adopt conformations that complement particular sites on the rough protein surface. No generally applicable motifs for binding have yet emerged. Previously published biochemical and biophysical data link this binding with function. This Article is Part of a Special Issue Entitled: Membrane Structure and Function: Relevance in the Cell's Physiology, Pathology and Therapy.     

Fixation methods for the study of lipid droplets by immunofluorescence microscopy.

The study of proteins associated with lipid droplets in adipocytes and many other cells is a rapidly developing area of inquiry. Although lipid droplets are easily visible by light microscopy, few standardized microscopy methods have been developed. Several methods of chemical fixation have recently been used to preserve cell structure before visualization of lipid droplets by light microscopy. We tested the most commonly used methods to compare the effects of the fixatives on cellular lipid content and lipid droplet structure. Cold methanol fixation has traditionally been used before visualization of cytoskeletal elements. We found this method unacceptable for study of lipid droplets because it extracted the majority of cellular phospholipids and promoted fusion of lipid droplets. Cold acetone fixation is similarly unacceptable because the total cellular lipids are extracted, causing collapse of the shell of lipid droplet-associated proteins. Fixation of cells with paraformaldehyde is the method of choice, because the cells retain their lipid content and lipid droplet structure is unaffected. As more lipid droplet-associated proteins are discovered and studied, it is critical to use appropriate methods to avoid studying artifacts.     

PAT family proteins pervade lipid droplet cores

The PAT family proteins, named after perilipin, adipophilin, and the tail-interacting protein of 47 kDa (TIP47), are implicated in intracellular lipid metabolism. They associate with lipid droplets, but how is completely unclear. From immunofluorescence studies, they are reported to be restricted to the outer membrane monolayer enveloping the lipid droplet and not to enter the core. Recently, we found another kind of lipid droplet-associated protein, caveolin-1, inside lipid droplets. Using freeze-fracture immunocytochemistry and electron microscopy, we now describe the distributions of perilipin and caveolin-1 and of adipophilin and TIP47 in lipid droplets of adipocytes and macrophages. All of these lipid droplet-associated proteins pervade the lipid droplet core and hence are not restricted to the droplet surface. Moreover, lipid droplets are surprisingly heterogeneous with respect to their complements and their distribution of lipid droplet-associated proteins. Whereas caveolin-1 is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum and is transferred to the lipid droplet core by inundating lipids during droplet budding, the PAT proteins, which are synthesized on free ribosomes in the cytoplasm, evidently target to the lipid droplet after it has formed. How the polar lipid droplet-associated proteins are accommodated among the essentially hydrophobic neutral lipids of the lipid droplet core remains to be determined.     

Lipids and lipid domains in the peroxisomal membrane of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica

Biological membranes have unique and highly diverse compositions of their lipid constituents. At present, we have only partial understanding of how membrane lipids and lipid domains regulate the structural integrity and functionality of cellular organelles, maintain the unique molecular composition of each organellar membrane by orchestrating the intracellular trafficking of membrane-bound proteins and lipids, and control the steady-state levels of numerous signaling molecules generated in biological membranes. Similar to other organellar membranes, a single lipid bilayer enclosing the peroxisome, an organelle known for its essential role in lipid metabolism, has a unique lipid composition and organizes some of its lipid and protein components into distinctive assemblies. This review highlights recent advances in our knowledge of how lipids and lipid domains of the peroxisomal membrane regulate the processes of peroxisome assembly and maintenance in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. We critically evaluate the molecular mechanisms through which lipid constituents of the peroxisomal membrane control these multistep processes and outline directions for future research in this field.     

Three-dimensional structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and location of the major associated 43-kD cytoskeletal protein, determined at 22 A by low dose electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction to 12.5 A [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1989 Oct;109(4 Pt 1):1185]

The three-dimensional structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) from Torpedo californica, crystallized both before and after removal of associated proteins, most notably the main 43-kD cytoskeletal protein that interacts both with AChR and actin, is determined to a resolution of 22 A. This is the first structural analysis where the 43-kD protein has been removed from the sample before crystallization. Thus, it provides the most reliable assessment of what constitutes the structure of the minimal five subunit AChR complex, and, by comparison with the native membrane, of the location of the 43-kD cytoskeletal protein. Image reconstruction of two-dimensional crystals includes information from electron images of up to +/- 52 degrees tilted specimens of latticed AChR. Hybrid density maps that include x-ray diffraction perpendicular to the membrane to 12.5 A resolution were used and eliminate some of the distortions introduced in maps based only on electron microscopic analyses. Comparison of the difference Fourier density maps between AChR with its normal complement of associated proteins, and without them shows that the main density, assigned to the actin-binding 43-kD component is closely associated with the lipid bilayer as well as with the cytoplasmic domain of the AChR. It binds beside the AChR, not beneath it as suggested by others (C. Toyoshima and N. Unwin 1988. Nature [Lond.]. 336:237-240). There is good agreement between the volumes of density for structural components and expected volumes based on their molecular weight. Acetylcholine receptors aggregate in the absence of any cytoskeletal proteins, suggesting that the AChR alone is sufficient to encode and stabilize clustering, and perhaps to do so during synaptogenesis. The main 43-kD component may play a role in location and rate of association of AChR. We show that the disulfide bond that cross-links delta-delta chains of adjacent pentamers in about 80% of AChR, is not required to stabilize the lattice of AChR. Latticed tube structures are stable indefinitely. The lattices described here have 20% less volume of lipid than those originally obtained and characterized by J. Kistler and R. M. Stroud (1981. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:3678-3682), or those subsequently characterized by A. Brisson and P. N. T. Unwin (1984. J. Cell Biol. 99:1202-1211) and A. Brisson and P. N. T. Unwin (1985. Nature (Lond.). 315:474-477).     

Lipids in photosystem II: interactions with protein and cofactors

Photosystem II (PSII) is a homodimeric protein-cofactor complex embedded in the thylakoid membrane that catalyses light-driven charge separation accompanied by the oxidation of water during oxygenic photosynthesis. Biochemical analysis of the lipid content of PSII indicates a number of integral lipids, their composition being similar to the average lipid composition of the thylakoid membrane. The crystal structure of PSII at 3.0 A resolution allowed for the first time the assignment of 14 integral lipids within the protein scaffold, all of them being located at the interface of different protein subunits. The reaction centre subunits D1 and D2 are encircled by a belt of 11 lipids providing a flexible environment for the exchange of D1. Three lipids are located in the dimerization interface and mediate interactions between the PSII monomers. Several lipids are located close to the binding pocket of the mobile plastoquinone Q(B), forming part of a postulated diffusion pathway for plastoquinone. Furthermore two lipids were found, each ligating one antenna chlorophyll a. A detailed analysis of lipid-protein and lipid-cofactor interactions allows to derive some general principles of lipid binding pockets in PSII and to suggest possible functional properties of the various identified lipid molecules.     

Mechanisms of lipid-body formation

Most organisms transport or store neutral lipids as lipid bodies - lipid droplets that usually are bounded by specific proteins and (phospho)lipid. Neutral-lipid bodies vary considerably in their morphology and are associated with an extremely diverse range of proteins. However, the mechanisms by which they are generated in plants, animals and microorganisms appear to share many common features: lipid bodies probably arise from microdomains of the endoplasmic reticulum (or the plasma membrane in prokaryotes) that contain lipid-biosynthesis enzymes, and their synthesis and size appear to be controlled by specific protein components.     

Plasmodesmata viewed as specialised membrane adhesion sites

A significant amount of work has been expended to identify the elusive components of plasmodesmata (PD) to help understand their structure, as well as how proteins are targeted to them. This review focuses on the role that lipid membranes may play in defining PD both structurally and as subcellular targeting addresses. Parallels are drawn to findings in other areas of research which focus on the lateral segregation of membrane domains and the generation of three-dimensional organellar shapes from flat lipid bilayers. We conclude that consideration of the protein–lipid interactions in cell biological studies of PD components and PD-targeted proteins may yield new insights into some of the many open questions regarding these unique structures.     

How protein transmembrane segments sense the lipid environment

Integral membrane proteins have central roles in a vast number of vital cellular processes. A structural feature that most membrane proteins have in common is the presence of one or more alpha-helices with which they traverse the lipid bilayer. Because of the interaction with the surrounding lipids, the organization of these transmembrane helices will be sensitive to lipid properties like lateral packing, hydrophobic thickness, and headgroup charge. The helices may adapt to the lipids in different ways, which in turn can influence the structure and function of the intact membrane protein. In this review, we will focus on how the lipid environment influences two specific properties of transmembrane segments: their lateral association and their tilt with respect to the bilayer normal.     

Global Network Analysis of Lipid-Raft-Related Proteins Reveals Their Centrality in the Network and Their Roles in Multiple Biological Processes

Lipid rafts are specialized cholesterol-enriched microdomains in the cell membrane. They have been known as a platform for protein-protein interactions and to take part in multiple biological processes. Nevertheless, how lipid rafts influence protein properties at the proteomic level is still an open question for researchers using traditional biochemical approaches. Here, by annotating the lipid raft localization of proteins in human protein-protein interaction networks, we performed a systematic analysis of the function of proteins related to lipid rafts. Our results demonstrated that lipid raft proteins and their interactions were critical for the structure and stability of the whole network, and that the interactions between them were significantly enriched. Furthermore, for each protein in the network, we calculated its “lipid raft dependency (LRD),” which indicates how close it is topologically associated with lipid rafts, and we then uncovered the connection between LRD and protein functions. Proteins with high LRD tended to be essential for mammalian development, and malfunction of these proteins was inclined to cause human diseases. Coordinated with their neighbors, high-LRD proteins participated in multiple biological processes and targeted many pathways in diseases pathogenesis. High-LRD proteins were also found to have tissue specificity of expression. In summary, our network-based analysis denotes that lipid raft proteins have higher centrality in the network, and that lipid-raft-related proteins have multiple functions and are probably concerned with many biological processes in disease development.