The Pre-NH2-Terminal Domain of the Herpes Simplex Virus 1 DNA Polymerase Catalytic Subunit Is Required for Efficient Viral Replication

The catalytic subunit of herpes simplex virus 1 DNA polymerase (HSV-1 Pol) has been extensively studied; however, its full complement of functional domains has yet to be characterized. A crystal structure has revealed a previously uncharacterized pre-NH₂-terminal domain (residues 1 to 140) within HSV-1 Pol. Due to the conservation of the pre-NH₂-terminal domain within the herpesvirus Pol family and its location in the crystal structure, we hypothesized that this domain provides an important function during viral replication in the infected cell distinct from 5′-3′ polymerase activity. We identified three pre-NH₂-terminal Pol mutants that exhibited 5′-3′ polymerase activity indistinguishable from that of wild-type Pol in vitro: deletion mutants PolΔN43 and PolΔN52 that lack the extreme N-terminal 42 and 51 residues, respectively, and mutant PolA₆, in which a conserved motif at residues 44 to 49 was replaced with alanines. We constructed the corresponding pol mutant viruses and found that the polΔN43 mutant displayed replication kinetics similar to those of wild-type virus, while polΔN52 and polA₆ mutant virus infection resulted in an 8-fold defect in viral yield compared to that achieved with wild type and their respective rescued derivative viruses. Additionally, both polΔN52 and polA₆ viruses exhibited defects in viral DNA synthesis that correlated with the observed reduction in viral yield. These results strongly indicate that the conserved motif within the pre-NH₂-terminal domain is important for viral DNA synthesis and production of infectious virus and indicate a functional role for this domain.     

The Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Transactivator Zta Interacts with the Helicase-Primase Replication Proteins

The Epstein-Barr virus transactivator Zta triggers lytic gene expression and is essential for replication of the lytic origin, oriLyt. Previous analysis indicated that the Zta activation domain contributed a replication-specific function. We now show that the Zta activation domain interacts with components of the EBV helicase-primase complex. The three helicase-primase proteins BBLF4 (helicase), BSLF1 (primase), and BBLF2/3 (primase-associated factor) were expressed fused to the Myc epitope. When expression plasmids for BBLF4 or BBLF2/3 plus BSLF1 (primase subcomplex) were separately transfected, the proteins localized to the cytoplasm. Interaction between Zta and the components of the helicase-primase complex was tested by examining the ability of Zta to alter the intracellular localization of these proteins. Cotransfection of Zta with Myc-BBLF4 resulted in nuclear translocation of Myc-BBLF4; similarly, cotransfection of Zta with the primase subcomplex led to nuclear translocation of the Myc-BSLF1 and Myc-BBLF2/3 proteins. This relocalization provides evidence for an interaction between Zta and the helicase and Zta and the primase subcomplex. An affinity assay using glutathione S-transferase–Zta fusion proteins demonstrated that Myc-BBLF4 and Myc-BBLF2/3 plus BSLF1 bound to the Zta activation domain (amino acids 1 to 133). In the nuclear relocalization assay, the amino-terminal 25 amino acids of Zta were required for efficient interaction with the primase subcomplex but not for interaction with BBLF4. Evidence for interaction between oriLyt bound Zta and the helicase-primase complex was obtained in a superactivation assay using an oriLyt-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter. Zta activated expression from a CAT reporter containing the complete oriLyt region and regulated by the oriLyt BHLF1 promoter. Cotransfection of the helicase-primase proteins, one of which was fused to a heterologous activation domain, led to Zta-dependent superactivation of CAT expression. This assay also provided evidence for an interaction between the single-stranded DNA binding protein, BALF2, and the Zta-tethered helicase-primase complex. The helicase-primase interaction is consistent with a role for Zta in stabilizing the formation of an origin-bound replication complex.     

The Carboxy-Terminal Segment of the Human Cytomegalovirus DNA Polymerase Accessory Subunit UL44 Is Crucial for Viral Replication

The amino-terminal 290 residues of UL44, the presumed processivity factor of human cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase, possess all of the established biochemical activities of the full-length protein, while the carboxy-terminal 143 residues contain a nuclear localization signal (NLS). We found that although the amino-terminal domain was sufficient for origin-dependent synthesis in a transient-transfection assay, the carboxy-terminal segment was crucial for virus replication and for the formation of DNA replication compartments in infected cells, even when this segment was replaced with a simian virus 40 NLS that ensured nuclear localization. Our results suggest a role for this segment in viral DNA synthesis.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) encodes a DNA polymerase which is composed of two subunits, UL54, the catalytic subunit, and UL44, an accessory protein (8, 12, 21). UL44 can be divided into two regions, a 290-residue amino (N)-terminal domain and a 143-residue carboxy (C)-terminal segment. The overall fold of the N-terminal domain is markedly similar to that of processivity factors such as herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) UL42 and eukaryotic proliferating cell nuclear antigen (6, 22, 41), which function to tether catalytic subunits to DNA to ensure long-chain DNA synthesis. In vitro, the N-terminal domain of UL44 is sufficient for all of the established biochemical activities of full-length UL44, including dimerization, binding to double-stranded DNA, interaction with UL54, and stimulation of long-chain DNA synthesis, consistent with a role as a processivity factor (4, 5, 8, 11, 23, 24, 39). In contrast, little is known about the functions of the C-terminal segment of UL44 other than its having been reported from transfection experiments to be important for downregulation of transactivation of a non-HCMV promoter (7) and to contain a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (3). Neither the importance of this NLS nor the role of the entire C-terminal segment has been investigated in HCMV-infected cells.We first examined whether the N-terminal domain is sufficient to support DNA synthesis from HCMV oriLyt in cells using a previously described cotransfection-replication assay (27, 28). A DpnI-resistant fragment, indicative of oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis, was detected in the presence of wild-type (WT) UL44 (pSI-UL44) (34) and in the presence of the UL44 N-terminal domain (pSI-UL44ΔC290), but not in the presence of UL44-F121A (6, 34), a mutant form previously shown not to support oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis (34) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). Thus, the N-terminal domain alone is sufficient to support oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis in a transient-transfection assay.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Effects of UL44 C-terminal truncations in various assays. (A) HFF cells were cotransfected with the pSP50 plasmid (containing the oriLyt DNA replication origin), a plasmid expressing WT or mutant UL44 (as indicated at the top of the panel), and plasmids expressing all of the other essential HCMV DNA replication proteins. At 5 days posttransfection, total DNA was extracted and cleaved with DpnI to digest unreplicated DNA and a Southern blot assay was performed to detect replicated pSP50. An arrow indicates DpnI-resistant, newly synthesized pSP50 fragments. (B) FLAG-tagged constructs analyzed in panel C are cartooned as horizontal bars. The names of the constructs are above the bars. The lengths of the constructs in amino acids are indicated by the scale at the bottom of the panel. The positions of residues required but not necessarily sufficient for features of the constructs are designated by shading, as indicated at the bottom of the panel. (C) Vero cells were transfected with plasmids expressing WT UL44 (parts a to c), FLAG-UL44 (parts d to f), FLAG-UL44-290stop (parts g to i), or FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (parts j to l). At 48 h posttransfection, cells were fixed and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to visualize the nucleus (blue) (parts a, d, g, and j) and by IF with anti-UL44 (part b) or anti-FLAG (parts e, h, and k) and a secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa 488 (green). Parts c, f, i, and l are merged from images in the left and middle columns. Magnification: ×1,000. (D) Replication kinetics of rescued viruses. Rescued derivatives of UL44 mutant viruses (UL44-290stop-R and UL44-290NLSstop-R) or WT AD169 viruses were used to infect HFF cells at an MOI of 1 PFU/cell. The supernatants from infected cells were collected every 24 h, and viral titers were determined by plaque assays on HFF cells.These results were somewhat unexpected, as the C-terminal segment contains a functional NLS identified in transfection assays (3). We therefore assayed the intracellular localization of WT and mutant UL44 following transient transfection using pcDNA3-derived expression plasmids. Since the anti-UL44 antibodies that we have tested do not recognize the N-terminal domain of UL44, we constructed UL44 genes to encode N-terminally FLAG-tagged full-length UL44 (FLAG-UL44) or a FLAG-tagged N-terminal domain, the latter by inserting three in-frame tandem stop codons after codon 290 (FLAG-UL44-290stop, Fig. ​Fig.1B).1B). We also constructed a mutant form encoding a FLAG-tagged N-terminal domain, followed by the simian virus 40 (SV40) T-antigen NLS (15-17), followed by three tandem stop codons (FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, Fig. ​Fig.1B).1B). Vero cells were transfected with each construct using Lipofectamine 2000, fixed with 4% formaldehyde at 48 h posttransfection, and assayed by indirect immunofluorescence (IF) using anti-UL44 (Virusys) or anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma). We observed mostly nuclear localization of WT UL44 or FLAG-UL44 with either diffuse or more localized intranuclear distribution (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts a to c and d to f, respectively) and some occasional perinuclear staining, which may be due to protein overexpression. In cells expressing FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, we observed mostly diffuse nuclear localization with little to no perinuclear staining (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts j to l). In cells expressing FLAG-UL44-290stop, we observed mostly cytoplasmic staining, but with some cells exhibiting some nuclear staining (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts g to i), which may explain the ability of truncated UL44 to support oriLyt-dependent DNA replication in a transient-transfection assay (Fig. ​(Fig.1A1A).We next investigated whether the C-terminal segment of UL44 is necessary for viral replication. We reasoned that we could investigate whether any requirement for this segment could be due to a requirement for an NLS by testing whether the SV40 NLS could substitute for the loss of the UL44 C terminus. We therefore constructed HCMV UL44 mutant viruses by introducing the UL44-290stop and UL44-290NLSstop mutations into a WT AD169 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) using two-step red-mediated recombination as previously described (35, 38). We also constructed the same mutants with a FLAG epitope at the N terminus of UL44 (BAC-FLAG-UL44-290stop and BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop) to monitor UL44 expression, and we constructed rescued derivatives of the mutant BACs by replacing the mutated sequences with WT UL44 sequences, as described previously (35). We introduced BACs into human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells using electroporation (35, 38). In several experiments using at least two independent clones for each mutant, cells electroporated with any of the mutant BACs did not exhibit any cytopathic effect (CPE) within 21 days. In contrast, within 7 to 10 days, cells electroporated with the WT AD169 BAC, a BAC expressing WT UL44 with an N-terminal FLAG tag [AD169-BACF44 (35)], or any of the rescued derivatives began displaying a CPE and yielded infectious virus. The rescued derivatives of the nontagged mutants displayed replication kinetics similar to those of the WT virus following infection at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 PFU/cell (Fig. ​(Fig.1D).1D). The rescued derivatives of the FLAG-tagged mutants also replicated to WT levels (data not shown). Thus, the replication defects of the mutants were due to the introduced mutations that result in truncated UL44 either with or without the SV40 NLS. We therefore conclude that the C-terminal segment of UL44 is required for viral replication.To investigate the stage of viral replication at which the UL44 C-terminal segment is important, we first assayed the subcellular localization of immediate-early proteins IE1 and IE2 and FLAG-UL44 in cells electroporated with BAC DNA expressing the FLAG-tagged WT or the two mutant UL44s using IF at 2 days postelectroporation. IE1/IE2 could be detected diffusely distributed in nuclei of cells electroporated with all three BACs (Fig. 2b, f, and j). In cells electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, FLAG-UL44 was localized largely within the nucleus (Fig. 2c and k, respectively). In contrast, in cells electroporated with BAC-FLAG-UL44-290stop, the FLAG epitope was mainly localized diffusely in the cytoplasm, with only a small amount diffusely distributed in the nucleus (Fig. ​(Fig.2g).2g). These data indicate that IE proteins expressed from mutant BACs are properly localized and suggest that without its C-terminal segment, which includes the NLS identified in transfection assays (3), UL44 cannot efficiently localize to the nucleus in HCMV-infected cells. However, addition of the SV40 NLS was sufficient to efficiently localize the N-terminal domain of UL44 to the nucleus. Thus, the requirement for the C-terminal segment of UL44 for viral replication is not due solely to its NLS.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Localization of IE1/IE2 and FLAG-UL44 proteins in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 (panels a to d), BAC-UL44-290stop (panels e to h), or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (panels i to l). At 48 h posttransfection, cells were fixed and probed with anti-IE1/2 (Virusys) or anti-FLAG (Sigma). Secondary antibodies coupled to fluorophores were used for visualization of IE1/2 (anti-mouse Alexa 594; panels b, f, and j) and FLAG (anti-rabbit Alexa 488; panels c, g, and k) antibodies. DAPI was used to counterstain the nucleus (panels a, e, and i). Panels d, h, and l are merged images of the panels in the other columns. Magnification: ×1,000.We next investigated if the block in viral replication due to the loss of the C-terminal segment could be attributed to a defect in viral DNA synthesis. Cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, and viral DNA accumulation was assayed by quantitative real-time PCR at various times postelectroporation (Fig. ​(Fig.3)3) as previously described (32, 35). In HFFs electroporated with AD169-BACF44, viral DNA began to accumulate above the input levels by 8 days postelectroporation and increased over time, with as much as a 350-fold increase over the input DNA level by 18 days postelectroporation. In contrast, levels of viral DNA in cells electroporated with BAC-UL44-290NLSstop did not increase above input levels, even by 18 days postelectroporation. These data are consistent with the notion that the UL44 C-terminal segment is required for viral DNA synthesis, although we caution that the assay did not detect DNA synthesis from AD169-BACF44 until day 8, when viral spread had likely occurred (see below).Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Quantification of viral DNA accumulation in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, and total DNA was harvested on the days postelectroporation indicated. Viral DNA accumulation was assessed by real-time PCR by assessing levels of the UL83 gene and normalizing to levels of the cellular β-actin gene (32). The data are presented as the fold increase in normalized viral DNA levels over the amount of input DNA (day 1).We also analyzed the localization patterns of UL44 and UL57, the viral single-stranded DNA binding protein, which is a marker for viral DNA replication compartments (1, 2, 18, 26, 29). At 8 days postelectroporation with AD169-BACF44, UL57 and FLAG-UL44 largely colocalized within a single large intranuclear structure that likely represents a fully formed replication compartment, with some cells containing multiple smaller globular structures within the nucleus that likely represent earlier stages of replication compartments (1, 2, 29) (Fig. 4a to d). Neighboring cells also stained for UL57 and FLAG-UL44, indicative of viral spread. In contrast, in cells electroporated with BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, UL57 (Fig. ​(Fig.4f)4f) was found in either punctate or small globular structures. This pattern of UL57 staining resembled that observed at very early stages of viral DNA synthesis in HCMV-infected cells, but the structures were larger and less numerous than those observed in HCMV-infected cells in the presence of a viral DNA polymerase inhibitor (2, 29). Staining for FLAG-UL44 was nuclear and largely diffuse, with some areas of more concentrated staining (Fig. ​(Fig.4g),4g), which could also be observed in some cells at day 2 postelectroporation (Fig. ​(Fig.3k).3k). This pattern of UL44 localization was generally similar to that observed in HCMV-infected cells at very early stages of infection or when HCMV DNA synthesis is blocked and also similar to the pattern in cells transfected with a UL84 null mutant BAC (2, 29, 33, 40). Importantly, little colocalization of UL57 and UL44 was observed, with areas of concentration of UL57 or UL44 occupying separate regions in the nuclei of these cells (Fig. ​(Fig.4h).4h). We are unaware of any other examples of this pattern of localization of these proteins in HCMV-infected cells and suggest that it may be a result of the loss of the UL44 C-terminal segment. These results indicate that this segment is important for efficient formation of viral DNA replication compartments, again consistent with a requirement for this portion of UL44 for viral DNA synthesis.Open in a separate windowFIG. 4.Localization of UL57 and FLAG-UL44 proteins in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 (panels a to d) or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (panels e to h). At 8 days posttransfection, cells were fixed and then stained with antibodies specific for UL57 (Virusys) or FLAG (Sigma), followed by a secondary antibody coupled to fluorophores to detect UL57 (anti-mouse Alexa 594; panels b and f) and FLAG (anti-rabbit Alexa 488; panels c and g) antibodies. DAPI stain was used to counterstain the nucleus (panels a and e). Panels d and h are merged images of the panels in the other columns. White arrows identify punctate UL57 staining. Yellow arrows identify areas of concentration of FLAG-UL44 staining. Magnification: ×1,000.Our results, taken together, argue for a role for the C-terminal segment of UL44 in HCMV-infected cells in efficient nuclear localization of UL44 and a role in viral DNA synthesis beyond its role in nuclear localization. It is possible that this segment interacts with host or viral proteins involved in DNA replication. Of the various proteins reported to interact with UL44 (10, 19, 30, 31, 35-37), interesting candidates include the host protein nucleolin, which has been shown to associate with UL44 and be important for viral DNA synthesis (35), and the viral UL112-113 proteins, which in transfection assays were shown to recruit UL44 to early sites of DNA replication (2, 29, 33). After this paper was submitted, Kim and Ahn reported that the C-terminal segment of UL44 is necessary for interaction with a UL112-113 protein and, similar to our findings, crucial for viral replication (19). However, contrary to our findings, they reported that this segment was not necessary for efficient nuclear localization of UL44 (19). It may well be that the C-terminal segment of UL44 also has some other role later in viral replication, perhaps in gene expression, as has been suggested (7, 13, 14).A virus with a deletion of the C-terminal 150 amino acids of the HSV-1 polymerase accessory subunit UL42 displays no obvious defect in replication (9). Thus, it appears that HSV-1 and HCMV exhibit different requirements for the C-terminal segments of their respective accessory proteins. This and many other differences between these functionally and structurally orthologous proteins (5, 6, 20, 24, 25) suggest considerable selection for different features during evolution.     

Homologous Recombinational Repair Factors Are Recruited and Loaded onto the Viral DNA Genome in Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Compartments

Homologous recombination is an important biological process that facilitates genome rearrangement and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The induction of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic replication induces ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)-dependent DNA damage checkpoint signaling, leading to the clustering of phosphorylated ATM and Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complexes to sites of viral genome synthesis in nuclei. Here we report that homologous recombinational repair (HRR) factors such as replication protein A (RPA), Rad51, and Rad52 as well as MRN complexes are recruited and loaded onto the newly synthesized viral genome in replication compartments. The 32-kDa subunit of RPA is extensively phosphorylated at sites in accordance with those with ATM. The hyperphosphorylation of RPA32 causes a change in RPA conformation, resulting in a switch from the catalysis of DNA replication to the participation in DNA repair. The levels of Rad51 and phosphorylated RPA were found to increase with the progression of viral productive replication, while that of Rad52 proved constant. Furthermore, biochemical fractionation revealed increases in levels of DNA-bound forms of these HRRs. Bromodeoxyuridine-labeled chromatin immunoprecipitation and PCR analyses confirmed the loading of RPA, Rad 51, Rad52, and Mre11 onto newly synthesized viral DNA, and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling analysis demonstrated DSBs in the EBV replication compartments. HRR factors might be recruited to repair DSBs on the viral genome in viral replication compartments. RNA interference knockdown of RPA32 and Rad51 prevented viral DNA synthesis remarkably, suggesting that homologous recombination and/or repair of viral DNA genome might occur, coupled with DNA replication to facilitate viral genome synthesis.Replication protein A (RPA), the eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, is a heterotrimeric complex composed of three tightly associated subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa (referred as to RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14, respectively) that is essential for DNA replication, recombination, and all major types of DNA repair (4). RPA participates in such diverse pathways through its ability to interact with DNA and numerous proteins involved in its processing. During DNA replication, RPA associates with ssDNA at forks and facilitates nascent-strand DNA synthesis by replicative DNA polymerases localized at replication foci during S phase. Under DNA-damaging conditions, RPA binds to ssDNA at damaged sites and interacts with repair and recombination components to process double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) and other lesions (6, 14, 21, 32, 38, 41).RPA undergoes both DNA damage-independent and -dependent phosphorylation on the N-terminal 33 residues of RPA32. Unstressed cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation occurs during the G₁/S-phase transition and in M phase, primarily at the conserved cyclin-CDK phosphorylation sites of Ser-23 and Ser-29 in the N terminus of the RPA32 subunit (13, 15). In contrast, stress-induced hyperphosphorylation of RPA is much more extensive. Nine potential phosphorylation sites within the N-terminal domain of RPA32, Ser-4, Ser-8, Ser-11/Ser-12/Ser-13, Thr-21, Ser-23, Ser-29, and Ser-33, in response to DNA-damaging agents, have been suggested (33, 54). Although this region of RPA32 is not required for the ssDNA-binding activity of RPA (5, 22), a phosphorylation-induced subtle conformation change in RPA, resulting from altered intersubunit interactions, regulates the interaction of RPA with both interacting proteins and DNA (30). The hyperphosphorylated form of RPA32 is unable to localize to replication centers in normal cells, while binding to DNA damage foci is unaffected (46). Therefore, RPA phosphorylation following damage is thought to both prevent RPA from catalyzing DNA replication and potentially serve as a marker to recruit repair factors to sites of DNA damage. RPA localizes to nuclear foci where DNA repair is occurring after DNA damage and is essential for multiple DNA repair pathways, participating in damage recognition, excision, and resynthesis reactions (4, 56).Mammalian cells can repair DSBs by homologous recombination (HR) or by nonhomologous end joining. HR is an accurate repair process, the first step of which is the resection of the 5′ ends of the DSB to generate 3′ ssDNA overhangs. This reaction is carried out by the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex, which not only functions as a damage sensor upstream of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)/ATM-Rad3-related (ATR) activation but also plays a role in DSB repair (4). RPA and members of the RAD52 epistasis group of gene products, such as Rad51, Rad52, and Rad54, bind to the resulting 3′ ssDNA strands and form a helical, nucleoprotein filament that facilitates the invasion of a damaged DNA strand into the homologous double-stranded DNA partner. The human Rad51 protein is a structural and functional homolog of the Escherichia coli RecA protein, which promotes homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro. Both Rad51 and Rad52 bind specifically to the terminal regions of tailed duplex DNA, the substrate thought to initiate recombination in vivo. Furthermore, nucleoprotein filaments of Rad51, formed on tailed DNA, catalyze strand invasion of homologous duplex DNA in a reaction that is stimulated by Rad52 and RPA (3).Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus that infects B lymphocytes, inducing their continuous proliferation. In B-lymphoblastoid cell lines, there is no production of virus particles, which is termed latent infection (52). Reactivation from latency is characterized by the expression of lytic genes, and one of the first detectable changes is the expression of the BZLF1 immediate-early gene product, which trans-activates viral promoters (16), leading to an ordered cascade of viral early and late gene expression. This lytic EBV DNA replication occurs in discrete sites in nuclei, called replication compartments, in which seven viral replication proteins are assembled (44). The viral genome is amplified several hundredfold by the viral replication machinery and is thought to generate highly branched replication intermediates through HR coupled with viral DNA replication (48). With the progression of lytic replication, the replication compartments become larger and appeared to fuse to form large globular structures that eventually filled the nucleus at late stages of infection (8, 45).We previously isolated latently EBV-infected Tet-BZLF1/B95-8 cells in which the exogenous BZLF1 protein is conditionally expressed under the control of a tetracycline-regulated promoter, leading to a highly efficient induction of lytic replication (28). Using this system, we have demonstrated that the induction of the EBV lytic program results in the inhibition of replication of cellular DNA in spite of the replication of viral DNA (28) and elicits a cellular DNA damage response, with the activation of the ATM-Chk2-p53 DNA damage transduction pathway (29). The DNA damage sensor MRN complex and phosphorylated ATM are recruited and retained in viral replication compartments (29).Here we report that RPA32 is extensively phosphorylated after EBV lytic replication is induced, with the phosphorylation sites in accordance with those for ATM. Phosphorylated RPA, Rad51, and Rad52, which are involved in HR repair (HRR), are recruited and retained in viral replication compartments as well as the MRN complex. Furthermore, DSBs could be demonstrated to occur during viral genome synthesis in the EBV replication compartments. HRR factors might be recruited to repair DSBs on the viral genome in viral replication compartments. RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of RPA32 and Rad51 prevented viral DNA synthesis remarkably, suggesting that HR and/or repair of viral DNA genome might occur, coupled with DNA replication, to facilitate viral genome synthesis.     

Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Nonstructural Protein 2C Interacts with Beclin1, Modulating Virus Replication

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), the causative agent of foot-and-mouth disease, is an Apthovirus within the Picornaviridae family. Replication of the virus occurs in association with replication complexes that are formed by host cell membrane rearrangements. The largest viral protein in the replication complex, 2C, is thought to have multiple roles during virus replication. However, studies examining the function of FMDV 2C have been rather limited. To better understand the role of 2C in the process of virus replication, we used a yeast two-hybrid approach to identify host proteins that interact with 2C. We report here that cellular Beclin1 is a specific host binding partner for 2C. Beclin1 is a regulator of the autophagy pathway, a metabolic pathway required for efficient FMDV replication. The 2C-Beclin1 interaction was further confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation and confocal microscopy to actually occur in FMDV-infected cells. Overexpression of either Beclin1 or Bcl-2, another important autophagy factor, strongly affects virus yield in cell culture. The fusion of lysosomes to autophagosomes containing viral proteins is not seen during FMDV infection, a process that is stimulated by Beclin1; however, in FMDV-infected cells overexpressing Beclin1 this fusion occurs, suggesting that 2C would bind to Beclin1 to prevent the fusion of lysosomes to autophagosomes, allowing for virus survival. Using reverse genetics, we demonstrate here that modifications to the amino acids in 2C that are critical for interaction with Beclin1 are also critical for virus growth. These results suggest that interaction between FMDV 2C and host protein Beclin1 could be essential for virus replication.     

Hsp90 Interacts Specifically with Viral RNA and Differentially Regulates Replication Initiation of Bamboo mosaic virus and Associated Satellite RNA

Host factors play crucial roles in the replication of plus-strand RNA viruses. In this report, a heat shock protein 90 homologue of Nicotiana benthamiana, NbHsp90, was identified in association with partially purified replicase complexes from BaMV-infected tissue, and shown to specifically interact with the 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR) of BaMV genomic RNA, but not with the 3′ UTR of BaMV-associated satellite RNA (satBaMV RNA) or that of genomic RNA of other viruses, such as Potato virus X (PVX) or Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). Mutational analyses revealed that the interaction occurs between the middle domain of NbHsp90 and domain E of the BaMV 3′ UTR. The knockdown or inhibition of NbHsp90 suppressed BaMV infectivity, but not that of satBaMV RNA, PVX, or CMV in N. benthamiana. Time-course analysis further revealed that the inhibitory effect of 17-AAG is significant only during the immediate early stages of BaMV replication. Moreover, yeast two-hybrid and GST pull-down assays demonstrated the existence of an interaction between NbHsp90 and the BaMV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. These results reveal a novel role for NbHsp90 in the selective enhancement of BaMV replication, most likely through direct interaction with the 3′ UTR of BaMV RNA during the initiation of BaMV RNA replication.     

The Second-Largest Subunit of the Mouse DNA Polymerase α-Primase Complex Facilitates Both Production and Nuclear Translocation of the Catalytic Subunit of DNA Polymerase α

DNA polymerase α-primase is a replication enzyme necessary for DNA replication in all eukaryotes examined so far. Mouse DNA polymerase α is made up of four subunits, the largest of which is the catalytic subunit with a molecular mass of 180 kDa (p180). This subunit exists as a tight complex with the second-largest subunit (p68), whose physiological role has remained unclear up until now. We set out to characterize these subunits individually or in combination by using a cDNA expression system in cultured mammalian cells. Coexpression of p68 markedly increased the protein level of p180, with the result that ectopically generated DNA polymerase activity was dramatically increased. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that while either singly expressed p180 or p68 was localized in the cytoplasm, cotransfection of both subunits resulted in colocalization in the nucleus. We identified a putative nuclear localization signal for p180 (residues 1419 to 1437) and found that interaction with p68 is essential for p180 to translocate into the nucleus. These results indicate that association of p180 with p68 is important for both protein synthesis of p180 and translocation into the nucleus, implying that p68 plays a pivotal role in the newly synthesized DNA polymerase α complex.