Different conformations of the kinase-on and kinase-off signaling states in the Aer HAMP domain

HAMP domains are sensory transduction modules that connect input and output domains in diverse signaling proteins from archaea, bacteria, and lower eukaryotes. Here, we employed in vivo disulfide cross-linking to explore the structure of the HAMP domain in the Escherichia coli aerotaxis receptor Aer. Using an Aer HAMP model based on the structure of Archaeoglobus fulgidus Af1503-HAMP, the closest residue pairs at the interface of the HAMP AS-1 and AS-2' helices were determined and then replaced with cysteines and cross-linked in vivo. Except for a unique discontinuity in AS-2, the data suggest that the Aer HAMP domain forms a parallel four-helix bundle that is similar to the structure of Af1503. The HAMP discontinuity was associated with a segment of AS-2 that was recently shown to interact with the Aer-PAS sensing domain. The four-helix HAMP bundle and its discontinuity were maintained in both the kinase-on and kinase-off states of Aer, although differences in the rates of disulfide formation also indicated the existence of different HAMP conformations in the kinase-on and kinase-off states. In particular, the kinase-on state was accompanied by significantly increased disulfide formation rates at the distal end of the HAMP four-helix bundle. This indicates that HAMP signaling may be associated with a tilting of the AS-1 and AS-2' helices, which may be the signal that is transmitted to the kinase control region of Aer.     

Genetic analysis of the HAMP domain of the Aer aerotaxis sensor localizes flavin adenine dinucleotide-binding determinants to the AS-2 helix

HAMP domains are signal transduction domains typically located between the membrane anchor and cytoplasmic signaling domain of the proteins in which they occur. The prototypical structure consists of two helical amphipathic sequences (AS-1 and AS-2) connected by a region of undetermined structure. The Escherichia coli aerotaxis receptor, Aer, has a HAMP domain and a PAS domain with a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor that senses the intracellular energy level. Previous studies reported mutations in the HAMP domain that abolished FAD binding to the PAS domain. In this study, using random and site-directed mutagenesis, we identified the distal helix, AS-2, as the component of the HAMP domain that stabilizes FAD binding. AS-2 in Aer is not amphipathic and is predicted to be buried. Mutations in the sequence coding for the contiguous proximal signaling domain altered signaling by Aer but did not affect FAD binding. The V264M residue replacement in this region resulted in an inverted response in which E. coli cells expressing the mutant Aer protein were repelled by oxygen. Bioinformatics analysis of aligned HAMP domains indicated that the proximal signaling domain is conserved in other HAMP domains that are not involved in chemotaxis or aerotaxis. Only one null mutation was found in the coding sequence for the HAMP AS-1 and connector regions, suggesting that these are not active signal transduction sites. We consider a model in which the signal from FAD is transmitted across a PAS-HAMP interface to AS-2 or the proximal signaling domain.     

Aer on the inside looking out: paradigm for a PAS-HAMP role in sensing oxygen, redox and energy

Aer, the Escherichia coli aerotaxis (oxygen-sensing) receptor, is representative of a small class of receptors that face the cytoplasm in bacteria. Instead of sensing oxygen directly, Aer detects redox changes in the electron transport system or cytoplasm when the bacteria enter or leave a hypoxic microniche. As a result, Aer sensing also enables bacteria to avoid environments where carbon deficiency, unfavourable reduction potential or other insults would limit energy production. An FAD-binding PAS domain is the sensor for Aer and a HAMP domain interacts with the PAS domain to form an input-output module for signal transduction. By analogy to the first solution structure of an isolated HAMP domain from Archaeoglobus, Aer HAMP is proposed to fold into a four-helix bundle that rotates between a signal-on and signal-off conformation. Aer is the first protein in which a PAS-HAMP input-output module has been investigated. The structure and signal transduction mechanism of Aer is providing important insights into signalling by PAS and HAMP domains.     

Conserved residues in the HAMP domain define a new family of proposed bipartite energy taxis receptors

HAMP domains, found in many bacterial signal transduction proteins, generally transmit an intramolecular signal between an extracellular sensory domain and an intracellular signaling domain. Studies of HAMP domains in proteins where both the input and output signals occur intracellularly are limited to those of the Aer energy taxis receptor of Escherichia coli, which has both a HAMP domain and a sensory PAS domain. Campylobacter jejuni has an energy taxis system consisting of the domains of Aer divided between two proteins, CetA (HAMP domain containing) and CetB (PAS domain containing). In this study, we found that the CetA HAMP domain differs significantly from that of Aer in the predicted secondary structure. Using similarity searches, we identified 55 pairs of HAMP/PAS proteins encoded by adjacent genes in a diverse group of microorganisms. We propose that these HAMP/PAS pairs form a new family of bipartite energy taxis receptors. Within these proteins, we identified nine residues in the HAMP domain and proximal signaling domain that are highly conserved, at least three of which are required for CetA function. Additionally, we demonstrated that CetA contributes to the invasion of human epithelial cells by C. jejuni, while CetB does not. This finding supports the hypothesis that members of HAMP/PAS pairs possess the capacity to act independently of each other in cellular traits other than energy taxis.     

The mechanisms of HAMP-mediated signaling in transmembrane receptors

HAMP domains mediate signal transduction in over 7500 enzyme-coupled receptors represented in all kingdoms of life. The HAMP domain of the putative archaeal receptor Af1503 has a parallel, dimeric, four-helical coiled coil structure, but with unusual core packing, related to canonical packing by concerted axial rotation of the helices. This has led to the gearbox model for signal transduction, whereby the alternate packing modes correspond to signaling states. Here we present structures of a series of Af1503 HAMP variants. We show that substitution of a conserved small side chain within the domain core (A291) for larger residues induces a gradual transition in packing mode, involving both changes in helix rotation and bundle shape, which are most prominent at the C-terminal, output end of the domain. These are correlated with activity and ligand response in vitro and in vivo by incorporating Af1503 HAMP into mycobacterial adenylyl cyclase assay systems.     

Delineating PAS‐HAMP interaction surfaces and signalling‐associated changes in the aerotaxis receptor Aer

The Escherichia coli aerotaxis receptor, Aer, monitors cellular oxygen and redox potential via FAD bound to a cytosolic PAS domain. Here, we show that Aer‐PAS controls aerotaxis through direct, lateral interactions with a HAMP domain. This contrasts with most chemoreceptors where signals propagate along the protein backbone from an N‐terminal sensor to HAMP. We mapped the interaction surfaces of the Aer PAS, HAMP and proximal signalling domains in the kinase‐off state by probing the solvent accessibility of 129 cysteine substitutions. Inaccessible PAS‐HAMP surfaces overlapped with a cluster of PAS kinase‐on lesions and with cysteine substitutions that crosslinked the PAS β ‐scaffold to the HAMP AS‐2 helix. A refined Aer PAS‐HAMP interaction model is presented. Compared to the kinase‐off state, the kinase‐on state increased the accessibility of HAMP residues (apparently relaxing PAS‐HAMP interactions), but decreased the accessibility of proximal signalling domain residues. These data are consistent with an alternating static‐dynamic model in which oxidized Aer‐PAS interacts directly with HAMP AS‐2, enforcing a static HAMP domain that in turn promotes a dynamic proximal signalling domain, resulting in a kinase‐off output. When PAS‐FAD is reduced, PAS interaction with HAMP is relaxed and a dynamic HAMP and static proximal signalling domain convey a kinase‐on output.     

Mechanism of regulation of receptor histidine kinases

Bacterial transmembrane receptors regulate an intracellular catalytic output in response to extracellular sensory input. To investigate the conformational changes that relay the regulatory signal, we have studied the HAMP domain, a ubiquitous intracellular module connecting input to output domains. HAMP forms a parallel, dimeric, four-helical coiled coil, and rational substitutions in our model domain (Af1503 HAMP) induce a transition in its interhelical packing, characterized by axial rotation of all four helices (the gearbox signaling model). We now illustrate how these conformational changes are propagated to a downstream domain by fusing Af1503 HAMP variants to the DHp domain of EnvZ, a bacterial histidine kinase. Structures of wild-type and mutant constructs are correlated with ligand response in vivo, clearly associating them with distinct signaling states. We propose that altered recognition of the catalytic domain by DHp, rather than a shift in position of the phospho-accepting histidine, forms the basis for regulation of kinase activity.     

Mutational Analysis of the Transmembrane Helix 2-HAMP Domain Connection in the Escherichia coli Aspartate Chemoreceptor Tar

Transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) of the Tar chemoreceptor undergoes an inward piston-like displacement of 1 to 3 Å upon binding aspartate. This signal is transmitted to the kinase-control module via the HAMP domain. Within Tar, the HAMP domain forms a parallel four-helix bundle consisting of a dimer of two amphipathic helices connected by a flexible linker. In the nuclear magnetic resonance structure of an archaeal HAMP domain, residues corresponding to the MLLT sequence between Arg-214 at the end of TM2 and Pro-219 of Tar are an N-terminal helical extension of AS1. We modified this region to test whether it behaves as a continuous helical connection between TM2 and HAMP. First, one to four Gly residues were inserted between Thr-218 and Pro-219. Second, the MLLT sequence was replaced with one to nine Gly residues. Third, the sequence was shortened or extended with residues compatible with helix formation. Cells expressing receptors in which the MLLT sequence was shortened to MLL or in which the MLLT sequence was replaced by four Gly residues performed good aspartate chemotaxis. Other mutant receptors supported diminished aspartate taxis. Most mutant receptors had biased signal outputs and/or abnormal patterns of adaptive methylation. We interpret these results to indicate that a strong, permanent helical connection between TM2 and the HAMP domain is not necessary for normal transmembrane signaling.The HAMP domain is a structural motif commonly found in histidine kinases (HKs), adenylate cyclases, methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), and phosphatases (2). In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica MCPs, the HAMP domain is located between a transmembrane-sensing module composed of ligand-binding and transmembrane regions and a kinase-control module composed of adaptation and kinase-activating regions (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (19). Therefore, HAMP domains are responsible for bidirectional signal transduction between these modules.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Domain architecture of the aspartate chemoreceptor. (A) The cartoon, based on a figure from Hazelbauer et al. (2008) (19), illustrates the architecture of the aspartate chemoreceptor. Protein structural domains are labeled on the left, and functional modules are labeled on the right. (B) Schematic of TM2 and the control cable region attached to a ribbon diagram of the solution NMR structure of the Af1503 HAMP domain four-helix bundle (22). TM2 is shown in purple within the membrane. The control cable of Tar_Ec consists of 5 amino acyl residues (Gly-Ile-Arg-Arg-Met) that connect TM2 and AS1 of HAMP. AS1 is shown in blue, AS2 is shown in red, and the 14-residue AS1-AS2 connector (CTR) is shown in black. The residue equivalent to Arg-214 in Tar_Ec is also highlighted in blue, the conserved Pro residue (Pro-219 in Tar_Ec) is highlighted in yellow, and residues equivalent to the MLLT sequence between TM2 and Pro-219 in Tar_Ec are highlighted in cyan.The determination of a high-resolution three-dimensional structure of a HAMP domain from an MCP remains elusive. However, a solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of a HAMP domain has been determined for the Af1503 protein of unknown function from the archaeal thermophile Archeoglobus fulgidus (22). The domain forms a parallel four-helix bundle, with two amphipathic helices, AS1 and AS2, being contributed by each subunit (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). In this structure, the helices pack in an unusual x-da configuration, commonly referred to as knobs-to-knobs packing, in which the large hydrophobic x residues stabilize both intrasubunit and intersubunit interactions.Evidence for the existence of a four-helix HAMP bundle within intact receptors comes from disulfide cross-linking experiments with Salmonella enterica Tar (Tar_Se) (41) and the E. coli Aer redox receptor (Aer_Ec) (44). In vivo genetic studies (1, 48) are also consistent with the existence of a four-helix bundle in the E. coli Tsr receptor (Tsr_Ec).Tar_Ec functions as the aspartate chemoreceptor in E. coli (39). Each monomer within the homodimeric (15, 29) receptor possess a periplasmic ligand-binding domain composed of four antiparallel α helices that form four-helix bundles (8). The transmembrane regions that flank this periplasmic domain (transmembrane helix 1 [TM1] and TM2) are extensions of the periplasmic helices PD1 and PD4 (27, 33, 37, 40). Aspartate binds at either of two rotationally symmetrical sites at the dimer interface. Each binding site contains residues from PD1 of one subunit and PD1′ and PD4′ of the other. Aspartate binding generates a small (∼1- to 3-Å) vertical displacement into the cytoplasm of one contiguous PD4-TM2 helix relative to the other (14).E. coli Tar (Tar_Ec) and other chemoreceptors normally activate the histidine protein kinase CheA (5), which is coupled to the receptors via the adapter protein CheW. CheA autophosphorylates, and the phosphoryl group is subsequently transferred to the response regulator CheY (21). CheY-P interacts with FliM within the flagellar motor to promote clockwise (CW) rotation of the flagella (36, 46). Counterclockwise (CCW) motor rotation allows the flagellar filaments to coalesce into a bundle that propels the cell in a run (38). CW rotation of one or more flagella disrupts the bundle and generates a tumble (43). Therefore, the relative activities of CheA and the CheY-P phosphatase, CheZ, establish the ratio of CheY to CheY-P within the cell and hence the frequency of tumbling (11, 21).The conformational changes induced by aspartate convert Tar_Ec from a stimulator of CheA activity into an inhibitor (6). The resulting drop in CheY-P activity, which is accelerated by CheZ, suppresses tumbling and lengthens the average run. Inhibition of CheA activity is reversed by covalent methylation of the cognate receptor (17). Methylation is facilitated by a transient decrease in the level of the active, phosphorylated form of the CheB methylesterase (26), which is another substrate for phosphotransfer from CheA (21). The well-studied properties of this system, and the possibility of monitoring several different in vivo parameters, make it amenable for examining signal transduction between TM2 and the adjoining HAMP domain.The apical region of AS1 in Tar_Ec is composed of the tetrapeptide Met-Leu-Leu-Thr, which connects residue Arg-214 at the end of TM2 with the conserved Pro-219 residue within AS1 of the HAMP domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). The corresponding sequence is Thr-Ile-Thr-Arg in the Af1503 HAMP domain. In the NMR structure of the isolated Af1503 HAMP, the corresponding four residues (Thr-Ile-Thr-Arg) comprise an unpaired helical extension of the N terminus of AS1 before Pro-283 (9, 22), but it is unclear how these residues may pack in an intact membrane-spanning protein. In the Af1503 HAMP, Pro-283 packs against residues Glu-311 and Ile-312, which form the N terminus of AS2. The residues at the equivalent positions in Tar_Ec are Glu-246 and Met-247 (Fig. ​(Fig.1B1B).We modified the length and residue composition of the region between Arg-214 and Pro-219 in Tar_Ec in different ways and monitored the ability of the mutant proteins to support chemotactic migration, to generate the clockwise flagellar rotation that reflects CheA activation, and to regulate adaptive methylation. The results support a model in which the structural tension exerted by TM2 on AS1 controls its signaling state, as proposed by Zhou et al. (48). In the context of that model, the results suggest that when the receptor is in the kinase-inhibiting state, the HAMP domain is in a stable four-helix bundle.     

The Aer protein of Escherichia coli forms a homodimer independent of the signaling domain and flavin adenine dinucleotide binding

In vivo cross-linking between native cysteines in the Aer receptor of Escherichia coli showed dimer formation at the membrane anchor and in the putative HAMP domain. Dimers also formed in mutants that did not bind flavin adenine dinucleotide and in truncated peptides without a signaling domain and part of the HAMP domain.     

Structure of Sorting Nexin 11 (SNX11) Reveals a Novel Extended Phox Homology (PX) Domain Critical for Inhibition of SNX10-induced Vacuolation

Sorting nexins are phox homology (PX) domain-containing proteins involved in diverse intracellular endosomal trafficking pathways. The PX domain binds to certain phosphatidylinositols and is recruited to vesicles rich in these lipids. The structure of the PX domain is highly conserved, containing a three-stranded β-sheet, followed by three α-helices. Here, we report the crystal structures of truncated human SNX11 (sorting nexin 11). The structures reveal that SNX11 contains a novel PX domain, hereby named the extended PX (PXe) domain, with two additional α-helices at the C terminus. We demonstrate that these α-helices are indispensible for the in vitro functions of SNX11. We propose that this PXe domain is present in SNX10 and is responsible for the vacuolation activity of SNX10. Thus, this novel PXe domain constitutes a structurally and functionally important PX domain subfamily.     

Interactions between the PAS and HAMP domains of the Escherichia coli aerotaxis receptor Aer

The Escherichia coli energy-sensing Aer protein initiates aerotaxis towards environments supporting optimal cellular energy. The Aer sensor is an N-terminal, FAD-binding, PAS domain. The PAS domain is linked by an F1 region to a membrane anchor, and in the C-terminal half of Aer, a HAMP domain links the membrane anchor to the signaling domain. The F1 region, membrane anchor, and HAMP domain are required for FAD binding. Presumably, alterations in the redox potential of FAD induce conformational changes in the PAS domain that are transmitted to the HAMP and C-terminal signaling domains. In this study we used random mutagenesis and intragenic pseudoreversion analysis to examine functional interactions between the HAMP domain and the N-terminal half of Aer. Missense mutations in the HAMP domain clustered in the AS-2 alpha-helix and abolished FAD binding to Aer, as previously reported. Three amino acid replacements in the Aer-PAS domain, S28G, A65V, and A99V, restored FAD binding and aerotaxis to the HAMP mutants. These suppressors are predicted to surround a cleft in the PAS domain that may bind FAD. On the other hand, suppression of an Aer-C253R HAMP mutant was specific to an N34D substitution with a predicted location on the PAS surface, suggesting that residues C253 and N34 interact or are in close proximity. No suppressor mutations were identified in the F1 region or membrane anchor. We propose that functional interactions between the PAS domain and the HAMP AS-2 helix are required for FAD binding and aerotactic signaling by Aer.     

Structural and Functional Analyses of PAS Domain Interactions of the Clock Proteins Drosophila PERIOD and Mouse PERIOD2

PERIOD proteins are central components of the Drosophila and mammalian circadian clocks. The crystal structure of a Drosophila PERIOD (dPER) fragment comprising two PER-ARNT-SIM (PAS) domains (PAS-A and PAS-B) and two additional C-terminal α-helices (αE and αF) has revealed a homodimer mediated by intermolecular interactions of PAS-A with tryptophane 482 in PAS-B and helix αF. Here we present the crystal structure of a monomeric PAS domain fragment of dPER lacking the αF helix. Moreover, we have solved the crystal structure of a PAS domain fragment of the mouse PERIOD homologue mPER2. The mPER2 structure shows a different dimer interface than dPER, which is stabilized by interactions of the PAS-B β-sheet surface including tryptophane 419 (equivalent to Trp482_dPER). We have validated and quantitatively analysed the homodimer interactions of dPER and mPER2 by site-directed mutagenesis using analytical gel filtration, analytical ultracentrifugation, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Furthermore we show, by yeast-two-hybrid experiments, that the PAS-B β-sheet surface of dPER mediates interactions with TIMELESS (dTIM). Our study reveals quantitative and qualitative differences between the homodimeric PAS domain interactions of dPER and its mammalian homologue mPER2. In addition, we identify the PAS-B β-sheet surface as a versatile interaction site mediating mPER2 homodimerization in the mammalian system and dPER-dTIM heterodimer formation in the Drosophila system.     

Crystal Structure of the VgrG1 Actin Cross-linking Domain of the Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion System

Vibrio cholerae is the cause of the diarrheal disease cholera. V. cholerae produces RtxA, a large toxin of the MARTX family, which is targeted to the host cell cytosol, where its actin cross-linking domain (ACD) cross-links G-actin, leading to F-actin depolymerization, cytoskeleton rearrangements, and cell rounding. These effects on the cytoskeleton prevent phagocytosis and bacterial engulfment by macrophages, thus preventing V. cholerae clearance from the gut. The V. cholerae Type VI secretion-associated VgrG1 protein also contains a C-terminal ACD, which shares 61% identity with MARTX ACD and has been shown to covalently cross-link G-actin. Here, we purified the VgrG1 C-terminal domain and determined its crystal structure. The VgrG1 ACD exhibits a V-shaped three-dimensional structure, formed of 12 β-strands and nine α-helices. Its active site comprises five residues that are conserved in MARTX ACD toxin, within a conserved area of ∼10 Å radius. We showed that less than 100 ACD molecules are sufficient to depolymerize the actin filaments of a fibroblast cell in vivo. Mutagenesis studies confirmed that Glu-16 is critical for the F-actin depolymerization function. Co-crystals with divalent cations and ATP reveal the molecular mechanism of the MARTX/VgrG toxins and offer perspectives for their possible inhibition.     

Segmental Helical Motions and Dynamical Asymmetry Modulate Histidine Kinase Autophosphorylation

Histidine kinases (HKs) are dimeric receptors that participate in most adaptive responses to environmental changes in prokaryotes. Although it is well established that stimulus perception triggers autophosphorylation in many HKs, little is known on how the input signal propagates through the HAMP domain to control the transient interaction between the histidine-containing and ATP-binding domains during the catalytic reaction. Here we report crystal structures of the full cytoplasmic region of CpxA, a prototypical HK involved in Escherichia coli response to envelope stress. The structural ensemble, which includes the Michaelis complex, unveils HK activation as a highly dynamic process, in which HAMP modulates the segmental mobility of the central HK α-helices to promote a strong conformational and dynamical asymmetry that characterizes the kinase-active state. A mechanical model based on our structural and biochemical data provides insights into HAMP-mediated signal transduction, the autophosphorylation reaction mechanism, and the symmetry-dependent control of HK kinase/phosphatase functional states.     

Hemolytic Lectin CEL-III Heptamerizes via a Large Structural Transition from α-Helices to a β-Barrel during the Transmembrane Pore Formation Process

CEL-III is a hemolytic lectin isolated from the sea cucumber Cucumaria echinata. This lectin is composed of two carbohydrate-binding domains (domains 1 and 2) and one oligomerization domain (domain 3). After binding to the cell surface carbohydrate chains through domains 1 and 2, domain 3 self-associates to form transmembrane pores, leading to cell lysis or death, which resembles other pore-forming toxins of diverse organisms. To elucidate the pore formation mechanism of CEL-III, the crystal structure of the CEL-III oligomer was determined. The CEL-III oligomer has a heptameric structure with a long β-barrel as a transmembrane pore. This β-barrel is composed of 14 β-strands resulting from a large structural transition of α-helices accommodated in the interface between domains 1 and 2 and domain 3 in the monomeric structure, suggesting that the dissociation of these α-helices triggered their structural transition into a β-barrel. After heptamerization, domains 1 and 2 form a flat ring, in which all carbohydrate-binding sites remain bound to cell surface carbohydrate chains, stabilizing the transmembrane β-barrel in a position perpendicular to the plane of the lipid bilayer.     

A Conformational Change of the γ Subunit Indirectly Regulates the Activity of Cyanobacterial F1-ATPase

The central shaft of the catalytic core of ATP synthase, the γ subunit consists of a coiled-coil structure of N- and C-terminal α-helices, and a globular domain. The γ subunit of cyanobacterial and chloroplast ATP synthase has a unique 30–40-amino acid insertion within the globular domain. We recently prepared the insertion-removed α₃β₃γ complex of cyanobacterial ATP synthase (Sunamura, E., Konno, H., Imashimizu-Kobayashi, M., and Hisabori, T. (2010) Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 855–865). Although the insertion is thought to be located in the periphery of the complex and far from catalytic sites, the mutant complex shows a remarkable increase in ATP hydrolysis activity due to a reduced tendency to lapse into ADP inhibition. We postulated that removal of the insertion affects the activity via a conformational change of two central α-helices in γ. To examine this hypothesis, we prepared a mutant complex that can lock the relative position of two central α-helices to each other by way of a disulfide bond formation. The mutant obtained showed a significant change in ATP hydrolysis activity caused by this restriction. The highly active locked complex was insensitive to N-dimethyldodecylamine-N-oxide, suggesting that the complex is resistant to ADP inhibition. In addition, the lock affected ϵ inhibition. In contrast, the change in activity caused by removal of the γ insertion was independent from the conformational restriction of the central axis component. These results imply that the global conformational change of the γ subunit indirectly regulates complex activity by changing both ADP inhibition and ϵ inhibition.     

The S Helix Mediates Signal Transmission as a HAMP Domain Coiled-Coil Extension in the NarX Nitrate Sensor from Escherichia coli K-12

In the nitrate-responsive, homodimeric NarX sensor, two cytoplasmic membrane α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain. The HAMP domain, a four-helix parallel coiled-coil built from two α-helices (HD1 and HD2), immediately follows the second transmembrane helix. Previous computational studies identified a likely coiled-coil-forming α-helix, the signaling helix (S helix), in a range of signaling proteins, including eucaryal receptor guanylyl cyclases, but its function remains obscure. In NarX, the HAMP HD2 and S-helix regions overlap and apparently form a continuous coiled-coil marked by a heptad repeat stutter discontinuity at the distal boundary of HD2. Similar composite HD2-S-helix elements are present in other sensors, such as Sln1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We constructed deletions and missense substitutions in the NarX S helix. Most caused constitutive signaling phenotypes. However, strongly impaired induction phenotypes were conferred by heptad deletions within the S-helix conserved core and also by deletions that remove the heptad stutter. The latter observation illuminates a key element of the dynamic bundle hypothesis for signaling across the heptad stutter adjacent to the HAMP domain in methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (Q. Zhou, P. Ames, and J. S. Parkinson, Mol. Microbiol. 73:801-814, 2009). Sequence comparisons identified other examples of heptad stutters between a HAMP domain and a contiguous coiled-coil-like heptad repeat sequence in conventional sensors, such as CpxA, EnvZ, PhoQ, and QseC; other S-helix-containing sensors, such as BarA and TorS; and the Neurospora crassa Nik-1 (Os-1) sensor that contains a tandem array of alternating HAMP and HAMP-like elements. Therefore, stutter elements may be broadly important for HAMP function.Transmembrane signaling in homodimeric bacterial sensors initiates upon signal ligand binding to the extracytoplasmic domain. In methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), the resulting conformational change causes a displacement of one transmembrane α-helix (TM α-helix) relative to the other. This motion is conducted by the HAMP domain to control output domain activity (reviewed in references 33 and 39).Certain sensors of two-component regulatory systems share topological organization with MCPs. For example, the paralogous nitrate sensors NarX and NarQ contain an amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module similar to those in MCPs, in which a pair of TM α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (24) (reviewed in references 32 and 62). The second TM α-helix connects to the HAMP domain. Hybrid proteins in which the NarX transmembrane signaling module regulates the kinase control modules of the MCPs Tar, DifA, and FrzCD demonstrate that NarX and MCPs share a mechanism for transmembrane signaling (73, 74, 81, 82).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.NarX modular structure. Linear representation of the NarX protein sequence, from the amino (N) to carboxyl (C) termini, drawn to scale. The four modules are indicated at the top of the figure and shown in bold typeface, whereas domains within each module are labeled with standard (lightface) typeface. The nomenclature for modules follows that devised by Swain and Falke (67) for MCPs. Overlap between the HAMP domain HD2 and S-helix elements is indicated in gray. The three conserved Cys residues within the central module (62) are indicated. TM1 and TM2 denote the two transmembrane helices. Helices H1 to H4 of the periplasmic domain (24), and the transmitter domain H, N, D, G (79), and X (41) boxes, are labeled. The HPK 7 family of transmitter sequences, including NarX, have no F box and an unconventional G box (79). The scale bar at the bottom of the figure shows the number of aminoacyl residues.The HAMP domain functions as a signal conversion module in a variety of homodimeric proteins, including histidine protein kinases, adenylyl cyclases, MCPs, and certain phosphatases (12, 20, 77). This roughly 50-residue domain consists of a pair of amphiphilic α-helices, termed HD1 and HD2 (formerly AS1 and AS2) (67), joined by a connector (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Results from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, Cys and disulfide scanning, and mutational analysis converge on a model in which the HD1 and HD2 α-helices form a four-helix parallel coiled-coil (7, 20, 30, 42, 67, 75, 84). The mechanisms through which HAMP domains mediate signal conduction remain to be established (30, 42, 67, 84) (for commentary, see references 43, 49, and 50).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.HAMP domain extensions. (A) Sequences from representative MCPs (E. coli Tsr and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium Tar) and S-helix-containing sensors (E. coli NarX, NarQ, and BarA, and S. cerevisiae Sln1p). The HAMP domain, S-helix element, and the initial sequence of the MCP adaptation region are indicated. Flanking numbers denote positions of the terminal residues within the overall sequence. Sequential heptad repeats are indicated in alternating bold and standard (lightface) typeface. Numbering for heptad repeats in the methylation region and S-helix sequences has been described previously (4, 8). Numbers within the HD1 and HD2 helices indicate interactions within the HAMP domain (42). Residues at heptad positions a and d are enclosed within boxes, residues at the stutter position a/d are enclosed within a thickly outlined box, and residues in the S-helix ERT signature are in bold typeface. (B) NarX mutational alterations. Deletions are depicted as boxes, and missense substitutions are shown above the sequence. Many of these deletions were reported previously (10) and are presented here for comparison. The phenotypes conferred by the alterations are indicated as follows: impaired induction, black box; constitutive and elevated basal, light gray box; reversed response, dark gray box; wild-type, white box; null, striped box.Coiled-coils result from packing of two or more α-helices (27). The primary sequence of coiled-coils exhibits a characteristic heptad repeat pattern, denoted as a-b-c-d-e-f-g (52, 61), in which positions a and d are usually occupied by nonpolar residues (reviewed in references 1, 47, and 80). For example, the coiled-coil nature of the HAMP domain can be seen in the heptad repeat patterns within the HD1 and HD2 sequences (Fig. ​(Fig.2A2A).Coiled-coil elements adjacent to the HAMP domain have been identified in several sensors, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sln1p (69) and Escherichia coli NarX (60). Recently, this element was defined as a specific type of dimeric parallel coiled-coil, termed the signaling helix (S helix), present in a wide range of signaling proteins (8). Sequence comparisons delimit a roughly 40-residue element with a conserved heptad repeat pattern (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Based on mutational analyses of Sln1p and other proteins, the S helix is suggested to function as a switch that prevents constitutive activation of adjacent output domains (8).The term “signaling helix” previously was used to define the α4-TM2 extended helix in MCPs (23, 33). Here, we use the term S helix to denote the element described by Anantharaman et al. (8).The NarX and NarQ sensors encompass four distinct modules (Fig. ​(Fig.1):1): the amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module, the signal conversion module (including the HAMP domain and S-helix element), the central module of unknown function, and the carboxyl-terminal transmitter module (62). The S-helix element presumably functions together with the HAMP domain in conducting ligand-responsive motions from the transmembrane signaling module to the central module, ultimately regulating transmitter module activity.Regulatory output by two-component sensors reflects opposing transmitter activities (reviewed in reference 55). Positive function results from transmitter autokinase activity; the resulting phosphosensor serves as a substrate for response regulator autophosphorylation. Negative function results from transmitter phosphatase activity, which accelerates phosphoresponse regulator autodephosphorylation (reviewed in references 64 and 65). We envision a homogeneous two-state model for NarX (17), in which the equilibrium between these mutually exclusive conformations is modulated by ligand-responsive signaling.Previous work from our laboratory concerned the NarX and other HAMP domains (9, 10, 26, 77) and separately identified a conserved sequence in NarX and NarQ sensors, the Y box, that roughly corresponds to the S helix (62). Therefore, we were interested to explore the NarX S helix and to test some of the predictions made for its function. Results show that the S helix is critical for signal conduction and suggest that it functions as an extension of the HAMP HD2 α-helix in a subset of sensors exemplified by Sln1p and NarX. Moreover, a stutter discontinuity in the heptad repeat pattern was found to be essential for the NarX response to signal and to be conserved in several distinct classes of HAMP-containing sensors.     

HAMP domain-mediated signal transduction probed with a mycobacterial adenylyl cyclase as a reporter

HAMP domains, ～55 amino acid motifs first identified in histidine kinases, adenylyl cyclases, methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, and phosphatases, operate as signal mediators in two-component signal transduction proteins. A bioinformatics study identified a coevolving signal-accepting network of 10 amino acids in membrane-delimited HAMP proteins. To probe the functionality of this network we used a HAMP containing mycobacterial adenylyl cyclase, Rv3645, as a reporter enzyme in which the membrane anchor was substituted by the Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor for serine (Tsr receptor) and the HAMP domain alternately with that from the protein Af1503 of the archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus or the Tsr receptor. In a construct with the Tsr-HAMP, cyclase activity was inhibited by serine, whereas in a construct with the HAMP domain from A. fulgidus, enzyme activity was not responsive to serine. Amino acids of the signal-accepting network were mutually swapped between both HAMP domains, and serine signaling was examined. The data biochemically tentatively established the functionality of the signal-accepting network. Based on a two-state gearbox model of rotation in HAMP domain-mediated signal propagation, we characterized the interaction between permanent and transient core residues in a coiled coil HAMP structure. The data are compatible with HAMP rotation in signal propagation but do not exclude alternative models for HAMP signaling. Finally, we present data indicating that the connector, which links the α-helices of HAMP domains, plays an important structural role in HAMP function.     

Crystal structure determination and site-directed mutagenesis of the Pyrococcus abyssi aCBF5-aNOP10 complex reveal crucial roles of the C-terminal domains of both proteins in H/ACA sRNP activity

In archaeal rRNAs, the isomerization of uridine into pseudouridine (Ψ) is achieved by the H/ACA sRNPs and the minimal set of proteins required for RNA:Ψ-synthase activity is the aCBF5–aNOP10 protein pair. The crystal structure of the aCBF5–aNOP10 heterodimer from Pyrococcus abyssi was solved at 2.1 Å resolution. In this structure, protein aNOP10 has an extended shape, with a zinc-binding motif at the N-terminus and an α-helix at the C-terminus. Both motifs contact the aCBF5 catalytic domain. Although less efficiently as does the full-length aNOP10, the aNOP10 C-terminal domain binds aCBF5 and stimulates the RNA-guided activity. We show that the C-terminal domain of aCBF5 (the PUA domain), which is wrapped by an N-terminal extension of aCBF5, plays a crucial role for aCBF5 binding to the guide sRNA. Addition of this domain in trans partially complement particles assembled with an aCBF5ΔPUA truncated protein. In the crystal structure, the aCBF5–aNOP10 complex forms two kinds of heterotetramers with parallel and perpendicular orientations of the aNOP10 terminal α-helices, respectively. By gel filtration assay, we showed that aNOP10 can dimerize in solution. As both residues Y41 and L48 were needed for dimerization, the dimerization likely takes place by interaction of parallel α-helices.     

Organization of the aerotaxis receptor aer in the membrane of Escherichia coli

The Aer receptor guides Escherichia coli to specific oxygen and energy-generating niches. The input sensor in Aer is a flavin adenine dinucleotide-binding PAS domain, which is separated from a HAMP/signaling output domain by two membrane-spanning segments that flank a short (four-amino-acid) periplasmic loop. In this study, we determined the overall membrane organization of Aer by introducing combinations of residues that allowed us to differentiate intradimeric collisions from interdimeric collisions. Collisions between proximal residues in the membrane anchor were exclusively intra- or interdimeric but, with one exception, not both. Cross-linking profiles were consistent, with a rigid rather than flexible periplasmic loop and a tilted TM2 helix that crossed TM2' at residue V197C, near the center of the lipid bilayer. The periplasmic loop formed a stable neighborhood that (i) included a maximum of three Aer dimers, (ii) did not swap neighbors over time, and (iii) appeared to be constrained by interactions in the cytosolic signaling domain.