Ubiquitination and deubiquitination: targeting of proteins for degradation by the proteasome

The post-translational modification of proteins by covalent attachment of ubiquitin targets these proteins for degradation by the proteasome. An astounding number of proteins are involved in ubiquitination and deubiquitination of proteins. The pathways are combinatorial, and selectivity of proteolysis will depend strongly on the exact combination of ubiquitinating and deubiquitinating enzymes present at any time. In addition to temporal control, it is likely that these modifications are also regulated spatially. In this review, we discuss the regulation of ubiquitination by enzymes of this pathway and highlight some of the outstanding problems in understanding this regulation.     

Autoregulation of the 26S proteasome by in situ ubiquitination

The 26S proteasome degrades ubiquitinated proteins, and proteasomal degradation controls various cellular events. Here we report that the human 26S proteasome is ubiquitinated, by which the ubiquitin receptors Adrm1 and S5a, the ATPase subunit Rpt5, and the deubiquitinating enzyme Uch37 are ubiquitinated in situ by proteasome-associating ubiquitination enzymes. Ubiquitination of these subunits significantly impairs the 26S proteasome''s ability to bind, deubiquitinate, and degrade ubiquitinated proteins. Moreover, ubiquitination of the 26S proteasome can be antagonized by proteasome-residing deubiquitinating enzymes, by the binding of polyubiquitin chains, and by certain cellular stress, indicating that proteasome ubiquitination is dynamic and regulated in cells. We propose that in situ ubiquitination of the 26S proteasome regulates its activity, which could function to adjust proteasomal activity in response to the alteration of cellular ubiquitination levels.     

Deubiquitinating enzymes in skeletal muscle atrophy—An essential role for USP19

The ubiquitin proteasome system is well recognized to be involved in mediating muscle atrophy in response to diverse catabolic conditions. To date, almost all of the genes that have been implicated are ubiquitin ligases. Although ubiquitination is modulated also by deubiquitinating enzymes, the roles of these enzymes in muscle wasting remains largely unexplored. In this article, the potential roles of deubiquitinating enzymes in regulating muscle size are discussed. This is followed by a review of the roles described for USP19, the deubiquitinating enzyme that has been most studied in muscle wasting. This enzyme is upregulated in muscle in many catabolic conditions and its inactivation leads to protection from muscle loss induced by stimuli that are common in many illnesses causing cachexia. It can regulate both protein synthesis and protein degradation as well as myogenesis, thereby modulating the key processes that control muscle mass. Roles for other deubiquitinating enzymes remain possible and to be explored.     

Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes

Attachment of ubiquitin to proteins is a crucial step in many cellular regulatory mechanisms and contributes to numerous biological processes, including embryonic development, the cell cycle, growth control, and prevention of neurodegeneration. In these diverse regulatory settings, the most widespread mechanism of ubiquitin action is probably in the context of protein degradation. Polyubiquitin attachment targets many intracellular proteins for degradation by the proteasome, and (mono)ubiquitination is often required for down-regulating plasma membrane proteins by targeting them to the vacuole (lysosome). Ubiquitin-protein conjugates are highly dynamic structures. While an array of enzymes directs the conjugation of ubiquitin to substrates, there are also dozens of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) that can reverse the process. Several lines of evidence indicate that DUBs are important regulators of the ubiquitin system. These enzymes are responsible for processing inactive ubiquitin precursors, proofreading ubiquitin-protein conjugates, removing ubiquitin from cellular adducts, and keeping the 26S proteasome free of inhibitory ubiquitin chains. The present review focuses on recent discoveries that have led to a better understanding the mechanisms and physiological roles of this diverse and still poorly understood group of enzymes. We also discuss briefly some of the proteases that act on ubiquitin-like protein (UBL) conjugates and compare them to DUBs.     

Uch2/Uch37 is the major deubiquitinating enzyme associated with the 26S proteasome in fission yeast

Conjugation of proteins to ubiquitin plays a central role for a number of cellular processes including endocytosis, DNA repair and degradation by the 26S proteasome. However, ubiquitination is reversible as a number of deubiquitinating enzymes mediate the disassembly of ubiquitin-protein conjugates. Some deubiquitinating enzymes are associated with the 26S proteasome contributing to and regulating the particle's activity. Here, we characterise fission yeast Uch2 and Ubp6, two proteasome associated deubiquitinating enzymes. The human orthologues of these enzymes are known as Uch37 and Usp14, respectively. We report that the subunit Uch2/Uch37 is the major deubiquitinating enzyme associated with the fission yeast 26S proteasome. In contrast, the activity of Ubp6 appears to play a more regulatory and/or structural role involving the proteasome subunits Mts1/Rpn9, Mts2/Rpt2 and Mts3/Rpn12, as Ubp6 becomes essential when activity of these subunits is compromised by conditional mutations. Finally, when the genes encoding Uch2/Uch37 and Ubp6 are disrupted, the cells are viable without showing obvious signs of impaired ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis, indicating that other deubiquitinating enzymes may remedy for the redundancy of these enzymes.     

Expression of the ubiquitin proteasome system in neonatal rat gonocytes and spermatogonia: role in gonocyte differentiation

The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) consists of a cascade of enzymatic reactions leading to the ubiquitination of proteins, with consequent degradation or altered functions of the proteins. Alterations in UPS genes have been associated with male infertility, suggesting the role of UPS in spermatogenesis. In the present study, we questioned whether UPS is involved in extensive remodeling and functional changes occurring during the differentiation of neonatal testicular gonocytes to spermatogonia, a step critical for the establishment of the spermatogonial stem cell population. We found that addition of the proteasome inhibitor lactacystin to isolated gonocytes inhibited their retinoic acid-induced differentiation in a dose-dependent manner, blocking the induction of the spermatogonial gene markers Stra8 and Dazl. We then compared the UPS gene expression profiles of Postnatal Day (PND) 3 gonocytes and PND8 spermatogonia, using gene expression arrays and quantitative real-time PCR analyses. We identified 205 UPS genes, including 91 genes expressed at relatively high levels. From those, 28 genes were differentially expressed between gonocytes and spermatogonia. While ubiquitin-activating enzymes and ligases showed higher expression in gonocytes, most ubiquitin conjugating and deubiquitinating enzymes were expressed at higher levels in spermatogonia. Concomitant with the induction of spermatogonial gene markers, retinoic acid altered the expression of many UPS genes, suggesting that the UPS is remodeled during gonocyte differentiation. In conclusion, these studies identified novel ubiquitin-related genes in gonocytes and spermatogonia and revealed that proteasome function is involved in gonocyte differentiation. Considering the multiple roles of the UPS, it will be important to determine which UPS genes direct substrates to the proteasome and which are involved in proteasome-independent functions in gonocytes and to identify their target proteins.     

The Catalytically Inactive Mutation of the Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme CDC34 Affects its Stability and Cell Proliferation

The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) plays important roles in the regulation of protein stability, localization, and activity. A myriad of studies have focused on the functions of ubiquitin ligases E3s and deubiquitinating enzymes DUBs due to their specificity in the recognition of downstream substrates. However, the roles of the most ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes E2s are not completely understood except that they transport the activated ubiquitin and form E2–E3 protein complexes. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme CDC34 can promote the degradation of downstream targets through the UPS whereas its non-catalytic functions are still elusive. Here, we find that mutation of the catalytically active cysteine to serine (C93S) results in the reduced ubiquitination, increased stability, and attenuated degradation rate of CDC34. Through semi-quantitative proteomics, we identify the CDC34-interacting proteins and discover that the wild-type and mutant proteins have many differentially interacted proteins. Detailed examination finds that some of them are involved in the regulation of gene expression, cell growth, and cell proliferation. Cell proliferation assay reveals that both the wild-type and C93S proteins affect the proliferation of a cancer cell line. Database analyses show that CDC34 mRNA is highly expressed in multiple cancers, which is correlated with the reduced patient survival rate. This work may help to elucidate the enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions of this protein and might provide additional insights for drug discovery targeting E2s.     

A Conserved Deubiquitinating Enzyme Uses Intrinsically Disordered Regions to Scaffold Multiple Protein Interaction Sites

In the canonical view of protein function, it is generally accepted that the three-dimensional structure of a protein determines its function. However, the past decade has seen a dramatic growth in the identification of proteins with extensive intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which are conformationally plastic and do not appear to adopt single three-dimensional structures. One current paradigm for IDR function is that disorder enables IDRs to adopt multiple conformations, expanding the ability of a protein to interact with a wide variety of disparate proteins. The capacity for many interactions is an important feature of proteins that occupy the hubs of protein networks, in particular protein-modifying enzymes that usually have a broad spectrum of substrates. One such protein modification is ubiquitination, where ubiquitin is attached to proteins through ubiquitin ligases (E3s) and removed through deubiquitinating enzymes. Numerous proteomic studies have found that thousands of proteins are dynamically regulated by cycles of ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Thus, how these enzymes target their wide array of substrates is of considerable importance for understanding the function of the cell''s diverse ubiquitination networks. Here, we characterize a yeast deubiquitinating enzyme, Ubp10, that possesses IDRs flanking its catalytic protease domain. We show that Ubp10 possesses multiple, distinct binding modules within its IDRs that are necessary and sufficient for directing protein interactions important for Ubp10''s known roles in gene silencing and ribosome biogenesis. The human homolog of Ubp10, USP36, also has IDRs flanking its catalytic domain, and these IDRs similarly contain binding modules important for protein interactions. This work highlights the significant protein interaction scaffolding abilities of IDRs in the regulation of dynamic protein ubiquitination.     

The emerging role of deubiquitination in nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) protects genome stability by eliminating DNA helix distorting lesions, such as those induced by UV radiation. The addition and removal of ubiquitin, namely, ubiquitination and deubiquitination, have recently been demonstrated as general mechanisms to regulate protein functions. Accumulating evidence shows that several NER factors are subjected to extensive regulation by ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Thus, the balance between E3 ligases and deubiquitinating enzyme activities can dynamically alter the ubiquitin landscape at DNA damage sites, thereby regulating NER efficiency. Current knowledge about XPC ubiquitination by different ubiquitin E3 ligases highlights the importance of ubiquitin linkage types in regulating XPC binding and release from damaged DNA. Here, we discuss the emerging roles of deubiquitinating enzymes and their ubiquitin linkage specificities in NER.     

Ubiquitin-specific protease 25 functions in Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated degradation

Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) discards abnormal proteins synthesized in the ER. Through coordinated actions of ERAD components, misfolded/anomalous proteins are recognized, ubiquitinated, extracted from the ER and ultimately delivered to the proteasome for degradation. It is not well understood how ubiquitination of ERAD substrates is regulated. Here, we present evidence that the deubiquitinating enzyme Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 25 (USP25) is involved in ERAD. Our data support a model where USP25 counteracts ubiquitination of ERAD substrates by the ubiquitin ligase HRD1, rescuing them from degradation by the proteasome.     

Ubiquitin Transfer from the E2 Perspective: Why is UbcH5 So Promiscuous?

Protein ubiquitination is a regulatory process that influences nearly every aspect of eukaryotic cell biology. Pathways that range from cell-cycle progression and differentiation to DNA repair to vesicle budding all rely on regulated modification of target proteins by ubiquitin. Target proteins can be tagged by a single molecule of ubiquitin or modified by ubiquitin polymers that can vary in length and linkage specificity, and these variations influence how ubiquitination signals are interpreted. Surprisingly, little is understood regarding mechanisms of protein ubiquitination and how poly-ubiquitin chains are synthesized. Simple models to explain ubiquitin transfer have dominated the literature, but recent work suggests basic assumptions as to how proteins assemble to facilitate protein ubiquitination and poly-ubiquitin chain synthesis should be re-examined. This is particularly necessary for understanding the roles played by E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, a central protein component in all ubiquitin transfer reactions. In particular, UbcH5, a canonical E2 protein that is active in a broad number of in vitro ubiquitin transfer reactions, is capable of binding ubiquitin non-covalently on a surface distinct from its active site. This unique property allows activated UbcH5~Ub complexes to self-assemble and has a profound influence on poly-ubiquitin chain synthesis.     

Deubiquitinating enzymes: their diversity and emerging roles

A growing number of important regulatory proteins within cells are modified by conjugation of ubiquitin, a well-conserved 76-amino-acid polypeptide. The ubiquitinated proteins are targeted to proteasome for degradation or alternative metabolic fates, such as triggering of plasma membrane endocytosis and trafficking to vacuoles or lysosomes. Deubiquitination, reversal of this modification, is being recognized as an important regulatory step. Deubiquitinating enzymes are cysteine proteases that specifically cleave off ubiquitin from ubiquitin-conjugated protein substrates as well as from its precursor proteins. Genome sequencing projects have identified more than 90 deubiquitinating enzymes, making them the largest family of enzymes in the ubiquitin system. This review will concentrate on recent important findings as well as new insights into the diversity and emerging roles of deubiquitinating enzymes in the ubiquitin-dependent pathway.     

Gettin' down with ubiquitin: turning off cell-surface receptors, transporters and channels

G-protein-coupled receptors and transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are modified with ubiquitin in response to ligand biding. In most cases, the proteasome does not recognize these ubiquitinated proteins. Instead, ubiquitination serves to trigger internalization and degradation of plasma membrane proteins in the lysosome-like vacuole. A number of mammalian receptors and at least one ion channel undergo ubiquitination at the plasma membrane, and this modification is required for their downregulation. Some of these cell-surface proteins appear to be degraded by both the proteasome and lysosomal proteases. Recent evidence indicates that other proteins required for receptor internalization might also be regulated by ubiquitination, suggesting that ubiquitin plays diverse roles in regulating plasma membrane protein activity.     

线性泛素化修饰研究进展

蛋白质泛素化修饰过程在调节各种细胞生物学功能的过程中发挥了非常重要的作用,如细胞周期进程、DNA损伤修复、信号转导和各种蛋白质膜定位等。泛素化修饰可分为多聚泛素化修饰和单泛素化修饰。多聚泛素化修饰系统可以通过对底物连接不同类型的多泛素化链调节蛋白质的功能。多聚泛素化修饰中已知7种泛素链连接方式均为泛素内赖氨酸连接方式。近几年发现了第8种类型的泛素链连接形式即线性泛素化,其泛素链的连接方式是由泛素甲硫氨酸的氨基基团与另一泛素甘氨酸的羧基基团相连形成泛素链标记。目前研究表明线性泛素化修饰在先天性免疫和炎症反应等多个过程中发挥着非常重要的作用。募集线性泛素链的泛素连接酶E3被称为LUBAC复合体,其组成底物以及其活性调控机制和功能所知甚少。本文综述了募集线性泛素化链的泛素连接酶、去泛素化酶、底物等活性调控机制及其在先天性免疫等多个领域中的功能,分析了后续研究方向,以期为相关研究提供参考。     

Deubiquitinating enzymes as cellular regulators

Modification of proteins by the covalent attachment of ubiquitin is a key regulatory mechanism of many cellular processes including protein degradation by the 26S proteasome. Deubiquitination, reversal of this modification, must also regulate the fate and function of ubiquitin-conjugated proteins. Deubiquitinating enzymes catalyze the removal of ubiquitin from ubiquitin-conjugated substrate proteins as well as from its precursor proteins. Deubiquitinating enzymes occupy the largest family of enzymes in the ubiquitin system, implying their diverse function in regulation of the ubiquitin-mediated pathways. Here we explore the diversity of deubiquitinating enzymes and their emerging roles as cellular regulators.     

O-GlcNAc修饰对蛋白质泛素化降解途径的影响

O-GlcNAc修饰是一种特殊的糖基化修饰,几乎参与生物体内所有细胞过程的调控。该修饰与泛素化作为两种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰形式,都与2型糖尿病、神经退行性疾病、癌症等疾病密切相关。O-GlcNAc修饰对蛋白质泛素化降解途径的影响主要体现在4个方面:(1)O-GlcNAc修饰能够抑制26S蛋白酶体的ATPase活性;(2)O-GlcNAc修饰会减少某些底物蛋白的泛素化降解;(3)O-GlcNAc修饰泛素化相关酶并调节其功能;(4)某些蛋白质(包括调控因子)发生O-GlcNAc修饰后间接影响蛋白质泛素化。     

Regulatory functions of ubiquitin in diverse DNA damage responses

In recent years there has been intense investigation and rapid progress in our understanding of the cellular responses to various types of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage that ensure genetic stability. These studies have identified numerous roles for ubiquitylation, the post-translational modification of proteins with single ubiquitin or poly-ubiquitin chains. Initially discovered for its role in targeting proteins for degradation in the proteasome, ubiquitylation functions in a variety of regulatory roles to co-ordinate the recruitment and activity of a large number of protein complexes required for recovery from DNA damage. This includes the identification of essential DNA damage response genes that encode proteins directly involved in the ubiquitylation process itself, proteins that are targets for ubiquitylation, proteins that contain ubiquitin binding domains, as well as proteins involved in the de-ubiquitylation process. This review will focus on the regulatory functions of ubiquitylation in three distinct DNA damage responses that involve ubiquitin modification of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in DNA damage tolerance, the core histone H2A and its variant H2AX in double strand break repair (DSBR) and the Fanconi anaemia (FA) proteins FANCD2 and FANCI in cross link repair.